Cited by 105Parasitic Diseases Research and TreatmentResearch on Leishmaniasis StudiesVector-Borne Animal Diseases

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 24 of the 25 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Natural Vectors of Dirofilariasis in Rural and Urban Areas of the Tuscan Region, Central Italy

Cancrini, G., Magi, M., Gabrielli, S., Arispici, M., Tolari, F., Dell’Omodarme, M., Prati, M. C.·2006·Journal of Medical Entomology

Abstract

Entomological investigations by means of dog- and human-baited traps were carried out in summers 2000–2002 in urban and rural areas of the Tuscan region in central Italy. The aim of the study was to define the mosquito species involved in the transmission of Dirofilaria nematodes and to assess the risk that their presence might represent for animal and human health. Nocturnal fieldwork on host-seeking activity and feeding preferences was followed by microscopic identification of the mosquito species attracted and by molecular identification of Dirofilaria parasites in mosquitoes. In total, 3,611 mosquito females belonging to 12 species, largely represented by Culex pipiens L. and Aedes caspius (Pallas), were caught. Some females of each species collected fed on the dogs, indicating their possible role as an intermediate host, but filarial DNA was found only in Cx. pipiens, Anopheles maculipennis s.l. (Meigen), and Coquillettidia richiardii (Ficalbi). In rural environments, the DNA evidence indicated the presence of infective larvae of Dirofilaria immitis, whereas in urban areas, infective larvae of Dirofilaria repens were present. The role of Cx. pipiens as a vector for heartworm disease and subcutaneous infections in natural and artificial environments was confirmed, whereas Ae. caspius seemed refractory to the infection. The different role of the collected species is discussed. The vector competence of An. maculipennis and Cq. richiardii needs further investigation, because the importance of these species poorly represented, and the role of species such as Aedes albopictus (Skuse), characterized by a dominant diurnal activity pattern, has to be evaluated.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/jmedent/43.3.574

Cites

24 of 24 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 25 references

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Cancrini G. Kramer L. . 2001. Insect vectors of Dirofilaria spp, pp. 63–82. In Simon F. Genchi C. [eds.], Heartworm infection in humans and animals. Ediciones Universidad Salamanca, Spain.
  2. Cancrini G. Della Torre A. Coluzzi M. . 1992. Different probabilities of transmission of Dirofilaria immitis and D. repens by Culex pipiens, p. 90. In Proceedings of 6th European Multicolloquium of Parasitology.
  3. Genchi C. Solari Basano F. Marrone R. V. Petruschke G. . 1998. Canine and feline heartworm in Europe with special emphasis on Italy, pp. 75–82. In Symposium ’98, 1–3 May 1998. American Heartworm Society, Batavia, IL.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Cancrini, G., Magi, M., Gabrielli, S., Arispici, M., Tolari, F., Dell’Omodarme, M., & Prati, M. C.
Affiliations
  • Sapienza University of Rome (IT)
  • University of Pisa (IT)
  • Scuola Normale Superiore (IT)
Venue
Journal of Medical Entomology
Published
2006-05-01
Volume
43
Issue
3
Pages
574-579
ISSN
  • 0022-2585 (ISSN-L)
  • 1938-2928
OpenAlex
W2213160558
Cited by
105
References
25
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 5
FWCI
2.87
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Medical Entomology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • BioOne Complete (BioOne) (submittedVersion)
  • CINECA IRIS Institutial research information system (University of Pisa) (submittedVersion)
  • IRIS Research product catalog (Sapienza University of Rome) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Ministero della Salute
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Parasitic Diseases Research and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Research on Leishmaniasis Studies
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Virology › Vector-Borne Animal Diseases
Keywords
dirofilariasis, mosquito vectors, Dirofilaria immitis, Dirofilaria repens, Culex pipiens, Aedes caspius, Anopheles maculipennis, Coquillettidia richardii, vector competence, heartworm disease, infective larvae, Aedes albopictus
MeSH terms
Aedes, Animals, Culex, Dirofilaria, Dirofilariasis, Dogs, Female, Humans, Insect Control, Insect Vectors, Italy, Pheromones, Rural Population, Urban Population, DNA, Helminth

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review