Cited by 113Schizophrenia research and treatmentVisual perception and processing mechanismsMental Health and Psychiatry

Perception Measurement in Clinical Trials of Schizophrenia: Promising Paradigms From CNTRICS

Open access
Green, M. F., Butler, P. D., Chen, Y., Geyer, M. A., Silverstein, S., Wynn, J. K., Yoon, J. H., Zemon, V.·2009·Schizophrenia Bulletin

Abstract

The third meeting of the Cognitive Neuroscience Treatment Research to Improve Cognition in Schizophrenia (CNTRICS) focused on selecting promising measures for each of the cognitive constructs selected in the first CNTRICS meeting. In the domain of perception, the 2 constructs of interest were gain control and visual integration. CNTRICS received 5 task nominations for gain control and three task nominations for visual integration. The breakout group for perception evaluated the degree to which each of these tasks met prespecified criteria. For gain control, the breakout group for perception believed that 2 of the tasks (prepulse inhibition of startle and mismatch negativity) were already mature and in the process of being incorporated into multisite clinical trials. However, the breakout group recommended that steady-state visual-evoked potentials be combined with contrast sensitivity to magnocellular vs parvocellular biased stimuli and that this combined task and the contrast-contrast effect task be recommended for translation for use in clinical trial contexts in schizophrenia research. For visual integration, the breakout group recommended the Contour Integration and Coherent Motion tasks for translation for use in clinical trials. This manuscript describes the ways in which each of these tasks met the criteria used by the breakout group to evaluate and recommend tasks for further development.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/schbul/sbn156

Cites

174 of 174 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. [1]CNTRICS Cognitive Neuroscience Approaches to Treatment Development of Impaired Cognition in Schizophrenia Proceedings of the First Meeting of the CNTRICS Initiative Biological Psychiatry 2008 64 1 78 PMC2577821 18466880
  2. [52]DeValois RL DeValois KK Spatial Vision New York, NY Oxford University Press 1990
  3. [156]Silverstein SM Hatashita-Wong M Schenkel LS Wilkniss S Kovacs I Feher A Smith T Goicochea C Uhlhaas P Carpiniello K Savitz A Reduced top-down influences in contour detection in schizophrenia Cognitive Neuropsychiatry 2006 11 112 32 16537237
  4. [159]Julesz B Foundation of cylopean perception Chicago University of Chicago Press 1971

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Green, M. F., Butler, P. D., Chen, Y., Geyer, M. A., Silverstein, S., Wynn, J. K., Yoon, J. H., & Zemon, V.
Affiliations
  • University of California, Los Angeles (US)
  • Nathan Kline Institute for Psychiatric Research (US)
  • Harvard University (US)
  • University of California San Diego (US)
  • University of California, Davis (US)
  • Yeshiva University (US)
Corresponding author
Green, M. F.
Venue
Schizophrenia Bulletin
Published
2009-01-01
Volume
35
Issue
1
Pages
163-181
ISSN
  • 0586-7614 (ISSN-L)
  • 1745-1701
OpenAlex
W2104383152
Cited by
113
References
174
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 16 · 2012: 7
FWCI
0.98
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Schizophrenia Bulletin (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs
  • Amgen
  • Bristol-Myers Squibb
  • Eli Lilly and Company
  • AstraZeneca
  • Sanofi
  • Dainippon Sumitomo Pharma
  • Astellas Pharma
  • Otsuka Pharmaceutical
  • H. Lundbeck A/S
  • National Institute of Mental Health (MH 52885, MH 61824, R01MH066374, R01MH052885, MH 43292, MH66374, R01MH061824)
  • National Institute on Drug Abuse (DA 02925, R01DA002925)
  • NIH Clinical Center
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Visual perception and processing mechanisms
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Mental Health and Psychiatry
Keywords
schizophrenia, perception
MeSH terms
Animals, Clinical Trials as Topic, Evoked Potentials, Visual, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Perceptual Disorders, Psychometrics, Schizophrenia, Reflex, Startle, Visual Perception

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review