Cited by 100

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 10 of the 10 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Targeted deletion of miR-132/-212 impairs memory and alters the hippocampal transcriptome

Hansen, Katelin F., Sakamoto, Kensuke, Aten, Sydney, Price, Kaiden H., Loeser, Jacob, Hesse, Andrea M., Page, Chloe E., Pelz, Carl, Arthur, J. Simon C., Impey, Soren, Obrietan, Karl·2016·Learning & Memory

Abstract

miR-132 and miR-212 are structurally related microRNAs that have been found to exert powerful modulatory effects within the central nervous system (CNS). Notably, these microRNAs are tandomly processed from the same noncoding transcript, and share a common seed sequence: thus it has been difficult to assess the distinct contribution of each microRNA to gene expression within the CNS. Here, we employed a combination of conditional knockout and transgenic mouse models to examine the contribution of the miR-132/-212 gene locus to learning and memory, and then to assess the distinct effects that each microRNA has on hippocampal gene expression. Using a conditional deletion approach, we show that miR-132/-212 double-knockout mice exhibit significant cognitive deficits in spatial memory, recognition memory, and in tests of novel object recognition. Next, we utilized transgenic miR-132 and miR-212 overexpression mouse lines and the miR-132/-212 double-knockout line to explore the distinct effects of these two miRNAs on the transcriptional profile of the hippocampus. Illumina sequencing revealed that miR-132/-212 deletion increased the expression of 1138 genes; Venn analysis showed that 96 of these genes were also downregulated in mice overexpressing miR-132. Of the 58 genes that were decreased in animals overexpressing miR-212, only four of them were also increased in the knockout line. Functional gene ontology analysis of downregulated genes revealed significant enrichment of genes related to synaptic transmission, neuronal proliferation, and morphogenesis, processes known for their roles in learning, and memory formation. These data, coupled with previous studies, firmly establish a role for the miR-132/-212 gene locus as a key regulator of cognitive capacity. Further, although miR-132 and miR-212 share a seed sequence, these data indicate that these miRNAs do not exhibit strongly overlapping mRNA targeting profiles, thus indicating that these two genes may function in a complex, nonredundant manner to shape the transcriptional profile of the CNS. The dysregulation of miR-132/-212 expression could contribute to signaling mechanisms that are involved in an array of cognitive disorders.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1101/lm.039578.115

Cites

10 of 10 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 10 references

Research works printed but not linked: 86

  1. 10.1128/MCB.00316-10 · DOI · Paper page
  2. 10.1083/jcb.200311141 · DOI
  3. 10.1186/gb-2010-11-10-r106 · DOI · Paper page
  4. 10.1126/science.1321498 · DOI · Paper page
  5. 10.1093/nar/gkm995 · DOI
  6. 10.1038/nprot.2006.205 · DOI
  7. 10.1016/j.biocel.2009.09.016 · DOI
  8. 10.1371/journal.pone.0094839 · DOI · Paper page
  9. 10.1016/j.mcn.2008.07.017 · DOI
  10. 10.1186/1750-1326-4-52 · DOI
  11. 10.1073/pnas.1017576108 · DOI · Paper page
  12. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.23-08-03547.2003 · DOI
  13. 10.1073/pnas.0801689105 · DOI
  14. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4815-07.2008 · DOI · Paper page
  15. 10.1210/me.2013-1332 · DOI
  16. 10.1186/2040-2392-5-14 · DOI
  17. 10.1016/S0168-0102(97)00050-3 · DOI
  18. 10.1126/science.1109020 · DOI · Paper page
  19. 10.1042/BJ20120578 · DOI
  20. 10.1046/j.0953-816x.2001.01531.x · DOI
  21. 10.1371/journal.pone.0015497 · DOI
  22. 10.1007/s00429-012-0431-4 · DOI · Paper page
  23. 10.1038/srep06930 · DOI
  24. 10.1016/j.bbr.2015.03.032 · DOI · Paper page
  25. 10.1038/nature09202 · DOI
  26. 10.1038/nprot.2008.211 · DOI · Paper page
  27. 10.1038/nn.2615 · DOI · Paper page
  28. 10.1038/2830 · DOI
  29. 10.1016/j.mcn.2009.10.005 · DOI · Paper page
  30. 10.1016/j.nbd.2007.11.001 · DOI · Paper page
  31. 10.1186/1750-1326-9-57 · DOI
  32. 10.1073/pnas.2333854100 · DOI
  33. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3178-07.2007 · DOI
  34. 10.1016/j.schres.2010.07.002 · DOI · Paper page
  35. 10.1371/journal.pone.0018472 · DOI
  36. 10.1093/eurheartj/ehu344 · DOI
  37. 10.1371/journal.pone.0024682 · DOI
  38. 10.1016/S0960-9822(02)00809-6 · DOI · Paper page
  39. 10.1371/journal.pone.0015182 · DOI · Paper page
  40. 10.1126/science.1178178 · DOI · Paper page
  41. 10.1007/s13238-014-0022-7 · DOI
  42. 10.1038/nature03315 · DOI · Paper page
  43. 10.1038/nn.2891 · DOI · Paper page
  44. 10.1073/pnas.1318445111 · DOI
  45. 10.1097/WNR.0b013e3280148e8b · DOI · Paper page
  46. 10.1073/pnas.1015691107 · DOI · Paper page
  47. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1910-13.2014 · DOI
  48. 10.1126/science.274.5293.1678 · DOI · Paper page
  49. 10.1038/nn.2909 · DOI · Paper page
  50. 10.1073/pnas.1113793109 · DOI · Paper page
  51. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2911-11.2012 · DOI
  52. 10.1016/j.neuropharm.2004.10.017 · DOI
  53. 10.1016/S0166-4328(01)00470-3 · DOI
  54. 10.1017/S1461145708009036 · DOI
  55. 10.1002/hipo.20646 · DOI
  56. 10.1016/j.ymeth.2010.08.009 · DOI
  57. 10.1038/nprot.2007.153 · DOI
  58. 10.1007/978-1-4939-2291-8_13 · DOI
  59. 10.1038/sj.emboj.7600447 · DOI
  60. 10.1101/lm.1094208 · DOI
  61. 10.1371/journal.pone.0062509 · DOI · Paper page
  62. 10.1111/j.1460-9568.1996.tb01548.x · DOI
  63. 10.1016/j.euroneuro.2012.07.014 · DOI
  64. 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2012.08220.x · DOI
  65. 10.1007/s00429-011-0376-z · DOI
  66. 2013, Plasma microRNA biomarkers for detection of mild cognitive impairment: biomarker validation study, Aging (Albany NY), 5, 925
  67. 10.1016/0092-8674(93)90376-2 · DOI
  68. 10.1038/362318a0 · DOI
  69. 10.1038/5007 · DOI
  70. 10.1093/nar/gkp870 · DOI
  71. 10.1038/nprot.2007.390 · DOI · Paper page
  72. 10.1016/j.mcn.2005.07.016 · DOI
  73. 10.1016/j.fob.2014.01.004 · DOI
  74. 10.1016/j.biocel.2011.10.015 · DOI
  75. 10.1038/nn.2920 · DOI · Paper page
  76. 10.1371/journal.pone.0074907 · DOI · Paper page
  77. 10.3389/fncel.2014.00412 · DOI
  78. 10.1101/lm.1220309 · DOI
  79. 10.1073/pnas.0508448102 · DOI · Paper page
  80. 2010, miR-212 is downregulated and suppresses methyl-CpG-binding protein MeCP2 in human gastric cancer, Int J Cancer, 127, 1106, 10.1002/ijc.25126 · DOI
  81. 10.1093/nar/gks151 · DOI
  82. 10.1007/s00401-010-0756-0 · DOI · Paper page
  83. 10.1002/hipo.22123 · DOI
  84. 10.1073/pnas.0803072105 · DOI · Paper page
  85. Wehner JM , Radcliffe RA . 2004. Cued and contextual fear conditioning in mice. Curr Protoc Neurosci Chapter 8: Unit 8.5C. · DOI
  86. 10.1007/978-94-007-5590-1_13 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 100

Metadata

Authors
Hansen, K. F., Sakamoto, K., Aten, S., Price, K. H., Loeser, J., Hesse, A. M., Page, C. E., Pelz, C., Arthur, J. S. C., Impey, S., & Obrietan, K.
Venue
Learning & Memory
Published
2016-01-15
Volume
23
Issue
2
Pages
61-71
ISSN
1549-5485
Cited by
100
References
10
Language
en
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (F31-MH096460, NS066345, NS091302, NS045758, MH103361)
  • National Science Foundation (1354612)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review