Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 6,073

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

N4ITK: Improved N3 Bias Correction

Open access
Tustison, Nicholas J, Avants, Brian B, Cook, Philip A, Yuanjie Zheng, Egan, Alexander, Yushkevich, Paul A, Gee, James C·2010·IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging

Abstract

A variant of the popular nonparametric nonuniform intensity normalization (N3) algorithm is proposed for bias field correction. Given the superb performance of N3 and its public availability, it has been the subject of several evaluation studies. These studies have demonstrated the importance of certain parameters associated with the B-spline least-squares fitting. We propose the substitution of a recently developed fast and robust B-spline approximation routine and a modified hierarchical optimization scheme for improved bias field correction over the original N3 algorithm. Similar to the N3 algorithm, we also make the source code, testing, and technical documentation of our contribution, which we denote as "N4ITK," available to the public through the Insight Toolkit of the National Institutes of Health. Performance assessment is demonstrated using simulated data from the publicly available Brainweb database, hyperpolarized (3)He lung image data, and 9.4T postmortem hippocampus data.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/tmi.2010.2046908

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Research works printed but not linked: 28

  1. 10.1007/11812715_10 · DOI
  2. ibanez, 2005, The ITK Software Guide
  3. tustison, 2009, N4ITK: Nick's N3 ITK implementation for MRI bias field correction, Insight J
  4. riesenfeld, 1975, Applications of B-Spline Approximation to Geometric Problems of Computer-Aided Design
  5. 10.1093/imamat/10.2.134 · DOI · Paper page
  6. 10.1016/0021-9045(72)90080-9 · DOI · Paper page
  7. 10.1016/0010-4485(94)00018-9 · DOI · Paper page
  8. 10.1109/34.88568 · DOI · Paper page
  9. 10.1073/pnas.52.4.947 · DOI · Paper page
  10. 10.1109/TMI.2005.861015 · doi:10.1109/tmi.2005.861015
  11. 10.1002/jmri.20104 · doi:10.1002/jmri.20104
  12. 10.1016/j.ejrad.2004.08.002 · DOI
  13. 10.1109/TMI.2006.891486 · DOI · Paper page
  14. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.10.026 · DOI
  15. 10.1007/s10334-003-0028-2 · DOI
  16. 10.1006/nimg.2001.0756 · DOI
  17. 10.1109/2945.620490 · DOI · Paper page
  18. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.06.039 · DOI
  19. 10.1155/IJBI/2006/49515 · DOI
  20. tustison, 2005, <formula formulatype="inline"> <tex notation="tex">${n}$</tex></formula>-d <formula formulatype="inline"> <tex notation="tex">${c}^{k}$</tex></formula> b-spline scattered data approximation, Insight J, 1
  21. 10.1016/j.media.2005.09.004 · DOI
  22. hjelle, 0, Approximation of scattered data with multilevel B-splines
  23. 10.1016/j.media.2007.03.001 · DOI
  24. 10.1117/12.467069 · DOI
  25. 10.1109/42.712135 · DOI · Paper page
  26. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2008.08.042 · DOI
  27. 10.1109/TMI.2006.883453 · DOI · Paper page
  28. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.03.052 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Tustison, N. J., Avants, B. B., Cook, P. A., Zheng, Y., Egan, A., Yushkevich, P. A., & Gee, J. C.
Venue
IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging
Published
2010-06
Volume
29
Issue
6
Pages
1310-1320
ISSN
  • 0278-0062 (ISSN-L)
  • 1558-254X
OpenAlex
W2117340355
Cited by
6,073
References
1
FWCI
26.17
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.