Cited by 204Neuroendocrine regulation and behaviorNeuropeptides and Animal PhysiologyPrimate Behavior and Ecology

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 113 of the 114 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; 1 of the 130 sources its claims cite were checked for support.

Comparative Perspectives on Oxytocin and Vasopressin Receptor Research in Rodents and Primates: Translational Implications

Open access
Freeman, Sara M., Young, Larry J.·2016·Journal of Neuroendocrinology

Abstract

In the last several decades, sophisticated experimental techniques have been used to determine the neurobiology of the oxytocin and vasopressin systems in rodents. Using a suite of methodologies, including electrophysiology, site‐specific selective pharmacology, receptor autoradiography, in vivo microdialysis, and genetic and optogenetic manipulations, we have gained unprecedented knowledge about how these neuropeptides engage neural circuits to regulate behaviour, particularly social behaviour. Based on this foundation of information from rodent studies, we have started generating new hypotheses and frameworks about how the oxytocin and vasopressin systems could be acting in humans to influence social cognition. However, despite the recent inundation of publications using intranasal oxytocin in humans, we still know very little about the neurophysiology of the oxytocin system in primates more broadly. Furthermore, the design and analysis of these human studies have remained largely uninformed of the potential neurobiological mechanisms underlying their findings. Although the methods available for studying the oxytocin and vasopressin systems in humans are incredibly limited as a result of practical and ethical considerations, there is great potential to fill the gaps in our knowledge by developing better nonhuman primate models of social functioning. Behavioural pharmacology and receptor autoradiography have been used to study the oxytocin and vasopressin systems in nonhuman primates, and there is now great potential to broaden our understanding of the neurobiology of these systems. In this review, we discuss comparative findings in receptor distributions in rodents and primates, with perspectives on the functionality of conserved regions of expression in these distinct mammalian clades. We also identify specific ways that established technologies can be used to answer basic research questions in primates. Finally, we highlight areas of future research in nonhuman primates that are experimentally poised to yield critical insights into the anatomy, physiology and behavioural effects of the oxytocin system, given its remarkable translational potential.

Overview

AI snapshot

Written from the paper’s full text.

TL;DR

This review compares oxytocin/vasopressin receptor distributions in rodents and primates, arguing that rodent OXTR is olfactory-centric while primate OXTR is enriched in visual-attention and cholinergic circuits. It concludes that nonhuman primates, guided by selective receptor mapping and pharmacology, can provide mechanistic translational insights that current human intranasal oxytocin studies cannot.

Key findings

  • Rodent OXTR expression is concentrated in olfactory pathways (olfactory bulb, accessory olfactory nucleus, medial amygdala, central amygdala, bed nucleus of stria terminalis, piriform cortex) plus lateral septum, hippocampus, NAcc, and prefrontal cortex; primate OXTR overlaps visual processing, gaze, and attention regions (superior colliculus, pulvinar, primary visual cortex, oculomotor nucleus, nucleus prepositus) and cholinergic regions including the nucleus basalis of Meynert in all four species investigated and the pedunculopontine tegmental nucleus in rhesus macaques.
  • Species differences are marked: prairie voles have dense NAcc OXTR that is low to absent in meadow and montane voles; marmosets have dense NAcc OXTR; titi monkeys lack NAcc OXTR but have AVPR1a in NAcc and dense OXTR in the dentate gyrus; rhesus macaques show sparse OXTR relative to AVPR1a, with densest OXTR in the NBM and superficial grey layer of the superior colliculus.
  • Translational/clinical links include that IN-OT acutely increases gaze to the eye region in autistic populations, three rhesus studies found IN-OT impacts social visual attention and looking behaviours, IN-OT alters neural responses to emotional faces in macaques, and OXTR SNP rs2254298 has been linked to smaller amygdala volume.
  • Pharmacological findings: 125I-OVTA and 125I-LVA lose binding selectivity in primate tissue; an optimised competitive binding autoradiography method mapped OXTR in rhesus and titi monkeys; selective antagonists include ALS-II-69, SR49059, and L-368,899, but radiolabelled L-368,899 showed minimal brain uptake and appeared to accumulate in ventricles rather than neural tissue on PET.

Methods

  • Design: narrative comparative review of oxytocin and vasopressin receptor research in rodents and primates, with translational implications.
  • Data/sample: literature on rodent species (including mice, rats, hamsters, guinea pigs, California and deer mice, tuco-tucos, singing mice, naked and Cape mole-rats, prairie, pine, montane, and meadow voles) and primates (common marmoset, rhesus macaque, coppery titi monkey, human), drawing on receptor autoradiography, behavioural pharmacology, electrophysiology, microdialysis, and genetic/optogenetic manipulations.
  • Main analysis: qualitative synthesis of receptor distributions and pharmacological findings; no meta-analysis or new primary quantitative dataset is reported.

Limitations

  • The paper states that primate OXTR mapping has lagged because 125I-OVTA and 125I-LVA lose binding selectivity in primate tissue; human OT system methods are “incredibly limited” by practical and ethical considerations; human IN-OT studies are often underpowered with modest effect sizes; and invasive NHP brain manipulations face ethical, cost, and animal welfare constraints.
  • The paper states that species differences in receptor distribution mean NHP central OXTR may or may not predict human OXTR, and that IN-OT effects may be mediated by AVPR1a or peripheral OXTR, complicating interpretation.
  • Evident from the text: as a narrative review, it relies on selected literature and some unpublished or ongoing observations, without a systematic search or quantitative synthesis.

Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/jne.12382

Cites

113 of 113 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

73 Not checked yet · 21 Own interpretation · 13 No basis given · 3 Own result · 1 Supported

Verify all 129 references — free account

Show all 81 claims

  • It may state two separate claims as one. 27
  • Probably not a substantial claim. 4
30 of 30
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Nonhuman primate models of social functioning can yield knowledge that translates to human oxytocin and vasopressin neurobiology.

    “there is great potential to fill the gaps in our knowledge by developing better nonhuman primate models of social functioning.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Conserved oxytocin receptor expression regions across primates have comparable functional roles relevant to social behaviour.

    “with perspectives on the functionality of conserved regions of expression in these distinct mammalian clades.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    A tool must not interact with other behaviourally relevant neurochemical systems to isolate OT function.

    “Although MC4R agonists show promise for eliciting OT-mediated behaviours, they also interact with other behaviourally relevant neurochemical systems (23) and thus are not useful tools for isolating OT function.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Targeting the OT system can improve social cognition in psychiatric disorders such as ASD and schizophrenia.

    “These advancements have remarkable implications not only for basic behavioural neurobiology and social neuroscience in NHP, but also for honing pharmacological therapies that may improve social cognition in psychiatric disorders, such as ASD and schizophrenia.”
4 of 4

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 114 references

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. PutnamP ZimmermanP GothardK.Oxytocin injected into the nucleus basalis of Meynert of monkeys enhanced basic social behaviors and modulated neural activity in the basolateral nuclei of the amygdala. Gordon Research Conference. New Frontiers in Amygdala Research: From Rodent to Man.2015. Easton MA.
  2. Hubel DH, 1995, Eye, Brain, and Vision

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 204

Metadata

Authors
Freeman, S. M., & Young, L. J.
Affiliations
  • University of California, Davis (US)
  • Emory University (US)
Corresponding author
Freeman, Sara M.
Venue
Journal of Neuroendocrinology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2016-04
Volume
28
Issue
4
ISSN
  • 0953-8194 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2826
OpenAlex
W2288695197
Cited by
196
References
114
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 32 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 30 · 2017: 22 · 2016: 16
FWCI
4.23
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Neuroendocrinology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institutes of Health (MH090776, 1P50MH100023)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Endocrine and Autonomic Systems › Neuroendocrine regulation and behavior
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuropeptides and Animal Physiology
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Primate Behavior and Ecology
Keywords
oxytocin, vasopressin, oxytocin receptor, vasopressin receptor, non-human primates, rodents, social behavior, social cognition, translational research, receptor distribution, intranasal oxytocin, behavioral pharmacology, receptor autoradiography, optogenetics, comparative neurobiology
MeSH terms
Animals, Species Specificity, Receptors, Vasopressin, Receptors, Oxytocin, Translational Research, Biomedical

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-10-08, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).

A second model labelled each claim on 2026-10-08 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).

Cited sources are checked with a language model’s help (gpt-6-sol).

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review