Cited by 280Neuroendocrine regulation and behaviorStress Responses and CortisolNeurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 234 of the 235 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; none of the 183 sources its claims cite is checked for support yet.

Neural mechanisms of social homeostasis

Open access
Matthews, Gillian A., Tye, Kay M.·2019·Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences

Abstract

Social connections are vital to survival throughout the animal kingdom and are dynamic across the life span. There are debilitating consequences of social isolation and loneliness, and social support is increasingly a primary consideration in health care, disease prevention, and recovery. Considering social connection as an “innate need,” it is hypothesized that evolutionarily conserved neural systems underlie the maintenance of social connections: alerting the individual to their absence and coordinating effector mechanisms to restore social contact. This is reminiscent of a homeostatic system designed to maintain social connection. Here, we explore the identity of neural systems regulating “social homeostasis.” We review findings from rodent studies evaluating the rapid response to social deficit (in the form of acute social isolation) and propose that parallel, overlapping circuits are engaged to adapt to the vulnerabilities of isolation and restore social connection. By considering the neural systems regulating other homeostatic needs, such as energy and fluid balance, we discuss the potential attributes of social homeostatic circuitry. We reason that uncovering the identity of these circuits/mechanisms will facilitate our understanding of how loneliness perpetuates long‐term disease states, which we speculate may result from sustained recruitment of social homeostatic circuits.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/nyas.14016

Cites

234 of 234 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

0 of 183 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged

Show all 69 claims

  • It may state two separate claims as one. 44
  • Probably not a substantial claim. 18
56 of 56
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    Social connection is an innate need.

    “Considering social connection as an “innate need,””
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Social connections are vital for survival across the animal kingdom and change over the lifespan.

    “Social connections are vital to survival throughout the animal kingdom and are dynamic across the lifespan.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Across the animal kingdom, social isolation can threaten survival because isolated individuals lack protection, foraging help, offspring care support, play, and mating opportunities.

    “Across the animal kingdom, social isolation can threaten survival—individuals lack protection from predators, assistance foraging, support raising offspring, opportunities for social play, and mating prospects.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    For many social species, social interactions are inherently rewarding and this is a major driver of social contact.

    “For many social species, the inherently rewarding nature of social interactions is a major driving force for social contact.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Prairie voles are socially monogamous and form an enduring, selective bond with a partner after mating.

    “Alternatively, prairie voles are socially monogamous and form an enduring, selective bond with their partner following mating.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Oxytocin neurons project both to the posterior pituitary and to distinct brain targets where they modulate neuronal activity.

    “Oxytocin neurons project not only to the posterior pituitary where they release oxytocin into the bloodstream but also to distinct targets within the brain for direct modulation of neuronal activity.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    A social homeostatic system has a control center with a set point for social contact.

    “Specifically, a change in environmental conditions and/or need state (e.g., hunger and thirst) may require a shift in the “set point” for social contact in the control center (Figs. 1b and 3).”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Initial social contact does not necessarily guarantee a rewarding social experience.

    “However, an important consideration for social behavior is that (unlike food detection) initial social contact does not necessarily guarantee a rewarding social experience.”
8 of 8

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.

  • Seven-day isolation exceeds the review's definition of acute

    Minor

    The review defines acute isolation as lasting under one week, but later includes mice isolated for seven days in its discussion of acute isolation. Seven days is a full week, not under one week.

1 of 1

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 235 references

1 of the 235 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. United Nations, 2017, United Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division (2017), Household Size & Composition
  2. Schjelderup‐Ebbe T., 1922, Beiträge zur Sozialpsychologie des Haushuhns. [Observation on the social psychology of domestic fowls.], Z. Für Psychol. Physiol. Sinnesorgane Abt 1 Z. Für Psychol., 88, 225

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–200 of 280

Metadata

Authors
Matthews, G. A., & Tye, K. M.
Affiliations
  • Massachusetts Institute of Technology (US)
  • Salk Institute for Biological Studies (US)
Corresponding author
Tye, Kay M.
Venue
Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2019-03-15
Volume
1457
Issue
1
Pages
5-25
ISSN
  • 0077-8923 (ISSN-L)
  • 1749-6632
OpenAlex
W2921413914
Cited by
273
References
235
Citations by year
2026: 32 · 2025: 45 · 2024: 40 · 2023: 72 · 2022: 29 · 2021: 33 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 5
FWCI
3.22
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • Esther A. and Joseph Klingenstein Fund
  • Alfred P. Sloan Foundation
  • New York Stem Cell Foundation
  • Charles A. King Trust (Postdoctoral Research Fellowship)
  • National Institute on Aging (RF1‐AG047661‐01)
  • JPB Foundation
  • McKnight Foundation
  • National Institute of Mental Health (R01‐MH102441‐01, R01‐MH115920)
  • National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (R01‐AA023305‐01)
  • NIH Office of the Director (New Innovator)
  • National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (DP2‐DK‐102256‐01)
  • National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health (Pioneer Award DP1‐AT009925)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Endocrine and Autonomic Systems › Neuroendocrine regulation and behavior
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Behavioral Neuroscience › Stress Responses and Cortisol
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
Keywords
social homeostasis, social isolation, loneliness, social connectedness, neural circuits, homeostatic regulation, social support, energy homeostasis, fluid balance, rodent models, disease susceptibility
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Psychological, Animals, Behavior, Animal, Arvicolinae, Glucocorticoids, Homeostasis, Humans, Hypothalamo-Hypophyseal System, Hypothalamus, Loneliness, Models, Neurological, Motivation, Oxytocin, Pituitary-Adrenal System, Receptors, Opioid, Social Behavior, Social Isolation, Social Support, Mice, Rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-10-07, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).

A second model labelled each claim on 2026-10-07 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review