Cited by 150Regulation of Appetite and ObesityNeurotransmitter Receptor Influence on BehaviorNeural and Behavioral Psychology Studies

Aerobic exercise reduces neuronal responses in food reward brain regions

Evero, Nero, Hackett, Laura C., Clark, Robert D., Phelan, Suzanne, Hagobian, Todd A.·2012·Journal of Applied Physiology

Abstract

Acute exercise suppresses ad libitum energy intake, but little is known about the effects of exercise on food reward brain regions. After an overnight fast, 30 (17 men, 13 women), healthy, habitually active (age = 22.2 ± 0.7 yr, body mass index = 23.6 ± 0.4 kg/m 2, V̇o 2peak = 44.2 ± 1.5 ml·kg−1·min−1) individuals completed 60 min of exercise on a cycle ergometer or 60 min of rest (no-exercise) in a counterbalanced, crossover fashion. After each condition, blood oxygen level-dependent responses to high-energy food, low-energy food, and control visual cues, were measured by functional magnetic resonance imaging. Exercise, compared with no-exercise, significantly ( P < 0.005) reduced the neuronal response to food (high and low food) cues vs. control cues in the insula (−0.37 ± 0.13 vs. +0.07 ± 0.18%), putamen (−0.39 ± 0.10 vs. −0.10 ± 0.09%), and rolandic operculum (−0.37 ± 0.17 vs. 0.17 ± 0.12%). Exercise alone significantly ( P < 0.005) reduced the neuronal response to high food vs. control and low food vs. control cues in the inferior orbitofrontal cortex (−0.94 ± 0.33%), insula (−0.37 ± 0.13%), and putamen (−0.41 ± 0.10%). No-exercise alone significantly ( P < 0.005) reduced the neuronal response to high vs. control and low vs. control cues in the middle (−0.47 ± 0.15%) and inferior occipital gyrus (−1.00 ± 0.23%). Exercise reduced neuronal responses in brain regions consistent with reduced pleasure of food, reduced incentive motivation to eat, and reduced anticipation and consumption of food. Reduced neuronal response in these food reward brain regions after exercise is in line with the paradigm that acute exercise suppresses subsequent energy intake.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1152/japplphysiol.01365.2011

Cites

65 of 65 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • 60 min of exercise among habitual exercisers reduced activation in the putamen and peri-insular brain regions to high-energy food cues.

    “In a similar study using a crossover design (85), 60 min of exercise among habitual exercisers reduced activation in the putamen and peri-insular brain regions to high-energy food cues.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Evero, N., Hackett, L. C., Clark, R. D., Phelan, S., & Hagobian, T. A.
Affiliations
California Polytechnic State University (US)
Corresponding author
Hagobian, Todd A.
Venue
Journal of Applied Physiology
Published
2012-05-01
Volume
112
Issue
9
Pages
1612-1619
ISSN
  • 0161-7567 (ISSN-L)
  • 8750-7587
  • 1522-1601
OpenAlex
W1971433552
Cited by
150
References
65
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 29 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 16 · 2012: 4
FWCI
5.67
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Applied Physiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Endocrine and Autonomic Systems › Regulation of Appetite and Obesity
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
Keywords
aerobic exercise, food reward, food cues, neural responses, energy intake, insula, putamen, rolandic operculum, food anticipation, incentive motivation
MeSH terms
Attention, Bicycling, Brain, Brain Mapping, California, Energy Intake, Cues, Eating, Female, Food, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Oxygen, Photic Stimulation, Reward, Time Factors, Visual Pathways, Visual Perception, Exercise, Down-Regulation, Cross-Over Studies, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review