Cited by 678Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology ResearchGenetic factors in colorectal cancerBRCA gene mutations in cancer

Prospective Risk of Pancreatic Cancer in Familial Pancreatic Cancer Kindreds

Klein, Alison P., Brune, Kieran A., Petersen, Gloria M., Goggins, Michael, Tersmette, Anne C., Offerhaus, G. Johan A., Griffin, Constance, Cameron, John L. +3 more·2004·Cancer Research

Abstract

Individuals with a family history of pancreatic cancer have an increased risk of developing pancreatic cancer. Quantification of this risk provides a rational basis for cancer risk counseling and for screening for early pancreatic cancer. In a prospective registry-based study, we estimated the risk of pancreatic cancer in individuals with a family history of pancreatic cancer. Standardized incidence ratios were calculated by comparing the number of incident pancreatic cancers observed with those expected using Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) rates. Familial pancreatic cancer (FPC) kindreds were defined as kindreds having at least one pair of first-degree relatives with pancreatic cancer, and sporadic pancreatic cancer (SPC) kindreds as families without such an affected pair. Nineteen incident pancreatic cancers developed among 5,179 individuals from 838 kindreds (at baseline, 370 FPC kindreds and 468 SPC kindreds). Of these 5,179 individuals, 3,957 had at least one first-degree relative with pancreatic cancer and contributed 10,538 person-years of follow-up. In this group, the observed-to-expected rate of pancreatic cancer was significantly elevated in members of FPC kindreds [9.0; 95% confidence interval (CI), 4.5–16.1], but not in the SPC kindreds (1.8; 95% CI., 0.22–6.4). This risk in FPC kindreds was elevated in individuals with three (32.0; 95% CI, 10.2–74.7), two (6.4; CI, 1.8–16.4), or one (4.6; CI, 0.5–16.4) first-degree relative(s) with pancreatic cancer. Risk was not increased among 369 spouses and other genetically unrelated relatives. Risk was higher in smokers than in nonsmokers. Individuals with a strong family history of pancreatic cancer have a significantly increased risk of developing pancreatic cancer.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1158/0008-5472.can-03-3823

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In the familial cancer setting, defining high-risk and very high-risk groups has been done by counting the number of FDRs affected by PDAC, with 2 affected FDRs defining an HRG and 3 FDRs defining a vHRG.

    “in the familial cancer setting, this has been done by counting the number of FDRs affected by PDAC, with 2 affected FDRs defining an HRG and 3 FDRs defining a vHRG.69”
  • The ENDPAC score further risk-stratifies NOD into below-average-risk, modest-risk group, and vHRG based on age, rapidity of rise of glucose, and change in weight in the 12 months before NOD date.

    “The ENDPAC score further risk-stratifies NOD into below-average-risk, modest-risk group, and vHRG based on age, rapidity of rise of glucose, and change in weight in the 12 months before NOD date.68”
  • New-onset diabetes cohort with an ENDPAC score of ≥3 falls in the very high-risk category.

    “New-onset diabetes cohort with an ENDPAC score of ≥3 falls in this category.68”
  • Subjects with NOD and ENDPAC score of >0 fall in the intermediate high-risk category.

    “Subjects with NOD and Enriching New-onset Diabetes for Pancreatic Cancer (ENDPAC) score of >0 fall in this category.68”
  • For sporadic pancreatic cancer, there is currently only one HRG and that is glycemically defined NOD.

    “For sporadic pancreatic cancer, there is currently only one HRG and that is glycemically defined NOD.68,71”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Klein, A. P., Brune, K. A., Petersen, G. M., Goggins, M., Tersmette, A. C., Offerhaus, G. J. A., Griffin, C., Cameron, J. L., Yeo, C. J., Kern, S., & Hruban, R. H.
Affiliations
  • National Institutes of Health (US)
  • 2Departments of Pathology,
  • Mayo Clinic (US)
  • Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam (NL)
  • Johns Hopkins University (US)
Venue
Cancer Research
Published
2004-04-01
Volume
64
Issue
7
Pages
2634-2638
ISSN
  • 0008-5472 (ISSN-L)
  • 1538-7445
OpenAlex
W2158834319
Cited by
678
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 32 · 2023: 29 · 2022: 60 · 2021: 47 · 2020: 43 · 2019: 36 · 2018: 31 · 2017: 43 · 2016: 39 · 2015: 36 · 2014: 32 · 2013: 19 · 2012: 39
FWCI
10.95
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Cancer Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Pure Amsterdam UMC (publishedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
Funders
National Cancer Institute (P50CA102701, R01CA097075, P50CA062924, CA 62924)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Genetic factors in colorectal cancer
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › BRCA gene mutations in cancer
Keywords
pancreatic cancer, familial pancreatic cancer, hereditary cancer predisposition, first-degree relatives, cancer risk assessment, standardized incidence ratio, cancer risk counseling, pancreatic cancer screening, smoking, genetic susceptibility
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Pancreatic Neoplasms, Prospective Studies, Risk Factors, Incidence, SEER Program, Genetic Predisposition to Disease

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review