The DOI matches its Crossref record, with a small difference in title or year; 74 of the 74 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; none of the 41 sources its claims cite is checked for support yet.
Long-Term Coffee Consumption and Risk of Cardiovascular Disease: A Systematic Review and a Dose–Response Meta-Analysis of Prospective Cohort Studies
Open accessAbstract
Background—: Considerable controversy exists on the association between coffee consumption and cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk. A meta-analysis was performed to assess the dose–response relationship of long-term coffee consumption with CVD risk. Methods and Results—: PubMed and EMBASE were searched for prospective cohort studies of the relationship between coffee consumption and CVD risk, which included coronary heart disease, stroke, heart failure, and CVD mortality. Thirty-six studies were included with 1 279 804 participants and 36 352 CVD cases. A nonlinear relationship of coffee consumption with CVD risk was identified ( P for heterogeneity=0.09, P for trend <0.001, P for nonlinearity <0.001). Compared with the lowest category of coffee consumption (median, 0 cups per day), the relative risk of CVD was 0.95 (95% confidence interval, 0.87–1.03) for the highest category (median, 5 cups per day) category, 0.85 (95% confidence interval, 0.80–0.90) for the second highest category (median, 3.5 cups per day), and 0.89 (95% confidence interval, 0.84–0.94) for the third highest category (median, 1.5 cups per day). Looking at separate outcomes, coffee consumption was nonlinearly associated with both coronary heart disease ( P for heterogeneity=0.001, P for trend <0.001, P for nonlinearity <0.001) and stroke ( P for heterogeneity=0.07, P for trend <0.001, P for nonlinearity <0.001; P for trend differences >0.05) risks. Conclusions—: A nonlinear association between coffee consumption and CVD risk was observed in this meta-analysis. Moderate coffee consumption was inversely significantly associated with CVD risk, with the lowest CVD risk at 3 to 5 cups per day, and heavy coffee consumption was not associated with elevated CVD risk.
Overview
AI snapshot
Written from the paper’s full text.
TL;DR
This systematic review and dose–response meta-analysis found a non-linear, U-shaped association between long-term coffee consumption and cardiovascular disease risk, with the lowest risk at 3 to 5 cups/day. Moderate coffee consumption was inversely associated with CVD, CHD, and stroke, while heavy consumption was not associated with elevated CVD risk.
Key findings
- Compared with the lowest coffee consumption category (median 0 cups/day), pooled relative risks for CVD were 0.89 (95% CI, 0.84–0.94) for the third highest category (median 1.5 cups/day), 0.85 (95% CI, 0.80–0.90) for the second highest category (median 3.5 cups/day), and 0.95 (95% CI, 0.87–1.03) for the highest category (median 5 cups/day).
- In the dose–response spline model, RRs versus no coffee consumption were 0.95 (0.93–0.97) at 1 cup/day, 0.92 (0.88–0.95) at 2 cups/day, 0.89 (0.85–0.93) at 3 cups/day, 0.88 (0.83–0.93) at 4 cups/day, 0.89 (0.83–0.95) at 5 cups/day, 0.91 (0.84–0.99) at 6 cups/day, and 0.93 (0.85–1.03) at 7 cups/day.
- Non-linear associations with significant trends were found for both CHD and stroke; heterogeneity was stronger for CHD (P for heterogeneity = 0.001) than for stroke (P for heterogeneity = 0.07).
- Stratified analyses found no significant interactions between categorized coffee consumption and baseline hypertension/MI, smoking status, publication year, NOS quality score, dietary assessment method, outcome, country, sex, or coffee type (all P for interactions > 0.05). Egger tests did not suggest publication bias.
Methods
- Systematic review and dose–response meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies, following the MOOSE protocol; PubMed and EMBASE were searched from January 1966 to March 2013.
- The abstract reports 36 included studies with 1,279,804 participants and 36,352 CVD cases; the Results and Discussion report approximately 1,283,685 participants and 47,779 CVD cases, including 28,347 CHD, 12,030 stroke, and 7,402 other CVD cases. The main analysis included 35 studies, and 29 studies were included in the dose–response analysis.
- Analyses used semi-parametric and parametric methods, random- or fixed-effects models, generalized least squares, and restricted cubic splines with 3 knots; stratified analyses and Egger’s regression symmetry test were also performed.
Limitations
- The paper states that, given the observational nature of included studies, residual confounding cannot be excluded and a causal relationship cannot be established; residual confounding by smoking may have biased heavy coffee consumption upward.
- The paper states that coffee brewing methods were not assessed, so results may not apply to unfiltered coffee (e.g., French press, Scandinavian boiled, or Turkish/Greek coffee).
- The paper states that none of the included cohorts assessed CYP1A2 genotype, so genotype-stratified analysis was not possible. Evident from the text: participant and CVD case counts differ between the abstract and the Results/Discussion sections.
Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
39 Own result · 23 Not checked yet · 17 Own interpretation · 14 Own method · 8 No basis given · 1 Sources not found
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“the imputed correlation coefficient between the risks of stroke and CHD within the same cohort (0 < ρ ≤ 1) did not have an effect on the relative risk of CVD for each category of coffee consumption.”
§ Long-Term Coffee Consumption and Risk of Cardiovascular Disease: A Systematic Review and a Dose-Response Meta-Analysis of Prospective Cohort Studies > Results > Coffee consumption and risk of CVD
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“0.90 (95% CI, 0.84 to 0.97; P for heterogeneity = 0.02; I2 = 40.3%) for the second highest category”
§ Long-Term Coffee Consumption and Risk of Cardiovascular Disease: A Systematic Review and a Dose-Response Meta-Analysis of Prospective Cohort Studies > Results > Stratified analyses
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“0.85 (95% CI, 0.80 to 0.90) for the second highest (median: 3.5 cups/d; mean: 3 cups/d)”
- Also stated in: § Methods and Results · plain
“0.85 (0.80 to 0.90) for the second highest (median: 3.5 cups/d)”
§ Long-Term Coffee Consumption and Risk of Cardiovascular Disease: A Systematic Review and a Dose-Response Meta-Analysis of Prospective Cohort Studies > Results > Coffee consumption and risk of CVD
plaincorrelationaln = 36,352- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Also stated in: § Methods and Results · plain
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“the RR of CVD was 0.96 (95% CI, 0.65 to 1.42) for age < 65 years”
§ Long-Term Coffee Consumption and Risk of Cardiovascular Disease: A Systematic Review and a Dose-Response Meta-Analysis of Prospective Cohort Studies > Results > Stratified analyses
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [27] Klatsky AL Friedman GD Armstrong MA Coffee use prior to myocardial infarction restudied: Heavier intake may increase the risk Am J Epidemiol 1990 132 479 488 2389752 source
- Not checked yetcites [28] Lindsted KD Kuzma JW Anderson JL Coffee consumption and cause-specific mortality. Association with age at death and compression of mortality J Clin Epidemiol 1992 45 733 742 1619453 source
- Not checked yetcites [29] Bidel S Hu G Qiao Q Jousilahti P Antikainen R Tuomilehto J Coffee consumption and risk of total and cardiovascular mortality among patients with type 2 diabetes Diabetologia 2006 49 2618 2626 17019600 source
- Not checked yetcites [30] Greenberg JA Dunbar CC Schnoll R Kokolis R Kokolis S Kassotis J Caffeinated beverage intake and the risk of heart disease mortality in the elderly: A prospective analysis AmJ Clin Nutr 2007 85 392 398 17284734 source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“No interactions between categorized coffee consumption and stratification variables in relation to CVD risk were observed (all P for interactions >0.05)”
§ Long-Term Coffee Consumption and Risk of Cardiovascular Disease: A Systematic Review and a Dose-Response Meta-Analysis of Prospective Cohort Studies > Results > Stratified analyses
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“0.80 (95% CI, 0.75 to 0.86; P for heterogeneity = 0.37; I2 = 6.5%) for the second category”
§ Long-Term Coffee Consumption and Risk of Cardiovascular Disease: A Systematic Review and a Dose-Response Meta-Analysis of Prospective Cohort Studies > Results > Stratified analyses
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“the RRs of CHD were 0.89 (95% CI, 0.85 to 0.94; P for heterogeneity = 0.83; I2 = 0.0%) for the third highest category”
§ Long-Term Coffee Consumption and Risk of Cardiovascular Disease: A Systematic Review and a Dose-Response Meta-Analysis of Prospective Cohort Studies > Results > Stratified analyses
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“0.95 (95% CI, 0.87 to 1.03) for the highest (median: 5 cups/d; mean: 5.5 cups/d) category of coffee consumption”
- Also stated in: § Methods and Results · plain
“0.95 (95% CI, 0.87 to 1.03) for the highest (median: 5 cups/d) category”
§ Long-Term Coffee Consumption and Risk of Cardiovascular Disease: A Systematic Review and a Dose-Response Meta-Analysis of Prospective Cohort Studies > Results > Coffee consumption and risk of CVD
plainn = 36,352- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Also stated in: § Methods and Results · plain
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“0.92 (95% CI, 0.88 to 0.95) for 2 cups/d”
§ Long-Term Coffee Consumption and Risk of Cardiovascular Disease: A Systematic Review and a Dose-Response Meta-Analysis of Prospective Cohort Studies > Results > Dose-response analysis of coffee consumption with risk of CVD
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“0.89 (95% CI, 0.85 to 0.93) for 3 cups/d”
§ Long-Term Coffee Consumption and Risk of Cardiovascular Disease: A Systematic Review and a Dose-Response Meta-Analysis of Prospective Cohort Studies > Results > Dose-response analysis of coffee consumption with risk of CVD
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- It may state two separate claims as one. 32
- Probably not a substantial claim. 20
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“we observed a non-linear association between coffee consumption and risk of CVD (P for non-linearity < 0.001) with a significant trend (P for trend <0.001) and limited heterogeneity in study results (P for heterogeneity = 0.09)”
- Also stated in: § Methods and Results · plain
“A non-linear relationship of coffee consumption with CVD risk was identified (P for heterogeneity = 0.09, P for trend < 0.001, P for non-linearity < 0.001).”
- Also stated in: § Conclusions · plain
“A non-linear association between coffee consumption with CVD risk was observed in this meta-analysis.”
§ Long-Term Coffee Consumption and Risk of Cardiovascular Disease: A Systematic Review and a Dose-Response Meta-Analysis of Prospective Cohort Studies > Results > Dose-response analysis of coffee consumption with risk of CVD
plaincorrelationaln = 36,352 ·- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Also stated in: § Methods and Results · plain
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Thirty-six studies remained in the meta-analysis (Figure 1).”
§ Long-Term Coffee Consumption and Risk of Cardiovascular Disease: A Systematic Review and a Dose-Response Meta-Analysis of Prospective Cohort Studies > Results > Characteristics of studies
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The included studies comprised approximately 1,283,685 study participants and 47,779 CVD cases, including 28,347 CHD cases, 12,030 stroke cases and 7,402 other CVD cases.”
§ Long-Term Coffee Consumption and Risk of Cardiovascular Disease: A Systematic Review and a Dose-Response Meta-Analysis of Prospective Cohort Studies > Results > Characteristics of studies
plainn = 47,779- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Our results remained largely unchanged and non-linear curves were found with including either CHD or stroke as the outcome”
§ Long-Term Coffee Consumption and Risk of Cardiovascular Disease: A Systematic Review and a Dose-Response Meta-Analysis of Prospective Cohort Studies > Results > Sensitivity analysis
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Since the vast majority of our participants were Caucasians, the allele frequency was expected to be consistent across various cohorts.”
§ Long-Term Coffee Consumption and Risk of Cardiovascular Disease: A Systematic Review and a Dose-Response Meta-Analysis of Prospective Cohort Studies > DISCUSSION
hedged- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“After adjustment for smoking and other covariates, heavy coffee was consumption was not significantly associated with CVD and the inverse association between moderate consumption and CVD became stronger.”
§ Long-Term Coffee Consumption and Risk of Cardiovascular Disease: A Systematic Review and a Dose-Response Meta-Analysis of Prospective Cohort Studies > DISCUSSION
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“One author (M. D.) assessed study eligibility and extracted the data, the other author (A. S.) independently double-checked the available data.”
§ Long-Term Coffee Consumption and Risk of Cardiovascular Disease: A Systematic Review and a Dose-Response Meta-Analysis of Prospective Cohort Studies > INTRODUCTION > Data extraction and quality assessment
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“We assessed the potential for publication bias using Egger's regression symmetry test.25”
§ Long-Term Coffee Consumption and Risk of Cardiovascular Disease: A Systematic Review and a Dose-Response Meta-Analysis of Prospective Cohort Studies > INTRODUCTION > Data Synthesis and Analysis
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [25] Egger M Davey Smith G Schneider M Minder C Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test BMJ 1997 315 629 634 9310563 PMC2127453 source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Sensitivity analysis was conducted by imputing different ρ (0 < ρ ≤ 1) to evaluate the robustness of the effect estimates.”
§ Long-Term Coffee Consumption and Risk of Cardiovascular Disease: A Systematic Review and a Dose-Response Meta-Analysis of Prospective Cohort Studies > INTRODUCTION > Data Synthesis and Analysis
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“The Newcastle-Ottawa quality assessment scale (NOS) 22was used to evaluate the quality of the included studies.”
§ Long-Term Coffee Consumption and Risk of Cardiovascular Disease: A Systematic Review and a Dose-Response Meta-Analysis of Prospective Cohort Studies > INTRODUCTION > Data extraction and quality assessment
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites [22] Wells GA SB O'Connell D Peterson J Welch V Losos M Tugwell P The newcastle-ottawa scale (nos) for assessing the quality of nonrandomized studies in meta-analysis 2011 www.ohri.ca/programs/clinical_epidemiology/oxford.asp
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Not matched
In the paper
“one recent meta-analysis paper showed that heavy coffee consumption was not associated with risk of CVD mortality.20”
§ Long-Term Coffee Consumption and Risk of Cardiovascular Disease: A Systematic Review and a Dose-Response Meta-Analysis of Prospective Cohort Studies > INTRODUCTION
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [20] Malerba S Turati F Galeone C Pelucchi C Verga F La Vecchia C Tavani A A meta-analysis of prospective studies of coffee consumption and mortality for all causes, cancers and cardiovascular diseases Eur J Epidemiol 2013 28 527 39 doi: 10.1007/s10654-013-9834-7. Epub 2013 Aug 11 23934579 source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
In the paper
“We followed the Meta-Analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology21 protocol throughout the design, implementation, analysis, and reporting of our meta-analysis.”
§ Long-Term Coffee Consumption and Risk of Cardiovascular Disease: A Systematic Review and a Dose-Response Meta-Analysis of Prospective Cohort Studies > INTRODUCTION > Methods
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [21] Stroup DF Berlin JA Morton SC Olkin I Williamson GD Rennie D Moher D Becker BJ Sipe TA Thacker SB Meta-analysis of observational studies in epidemiology: A proposal for reporting. Meta-analysis of observational studies in epidemiology (moose) group JAMA 2000 283 2008 2012 10789670 source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“We searched the PubMed and EMBASE databases for prospective studies that had evaluated the association between coffee consumption and risk of CVD between January 1966 and March 2013.”
§ Long-Term Coffee Consumption and Risk of Cardiovascular Disease: A Systematic Review and a Dose-Response Meta-Analysis of Prospective Cohort Studies > INTRODUCTION > Search strategy and selection criteria
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The scores of the NOS quality assessment ranged from 3 to 8, and 31 studies had scores of 5 or higher.”
§ Long-Term Coffee Consumption and Risk of Cardiovascular Disease: A Systematic Review and a Dose-Response Meta-Analysis of Prospective Cohort Studies > Results > Characteristics of studies
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Possible reasons for this discrepancy include a relatively small size, lack of updated dietary assessment, and subgroup analysis.”
§ Long-Term Coffee Consumption and Risk of Cardiovascular Disease: A Systematic Review and a Dose-Response Meta-Analysis of Prospective Cohort Studies > DISCUSSION
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [32] Liu J Sui X Lavie CJ Hebert JR Earnest CP Zhang J Blair SN Association of coffee consumption with all-cause and cardiovascular disease mortality Mayo Clin Proc 2013 88 1066 74 doi: 10.1016/j.mayocp.2013.06.020. Epub 2013 Aug 15 23953850 PMC3835155 source
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Recently, a genome-wide association study (GWAS) found a highly significant association between a variant on CYP1A2 and coffee intake48.”
§ Long-Term Coffee Consumption and Risk of Cardiovascular Disease: A Systematic Review and a Dose-Response Meta-Analysis of Prospective Cohort Studies > DISCUSSION
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [48] Cornelis MC Monda KL Yu K Paynter N Azzato EM Bennett SN Berndt SI Boerwinkle E Chanock S Chatterjee N Couper D Curhan G Heiss G Hu FB Hunter DJ Jacobs K Jensen MK Kraft P Landi MT Nettleton JA Purdue MP Rajaraman P Rimm EB Rose LM Rothman N Silverman D Stolzenberg-Solomon R Subar A Yeager M Chasman DI van Dam RM Caporaso NE Genome-wide meta-analysis identifies regions on 7p21 (ahr) and 15q24 (cyp1a2) as determinants of habitual caffeine consumption PLoS Genet 2011 7 e1002033 21490707 PMC3071630 source
boostedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“First, the consumption of decaffeinated coffee was much lower than caffeinated coffee, diminishing the power to detect any association.”
§ Long-Term Coffee Consumption and Risk of Cardiovascular Disease: A Systematic Review and a Dose-Response Meta-Analysis of Prospective Cohort Studies > DISCUSSION
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“It has been shown that drinking boiled coffee increases serum cholesterol, an important risk factor for CVD5.”
§ Long-Term Coffee Consumption and Risk of Cardiovascular Disease: A Systematic Review and a Dose-Response Meta-Analysis of Prospective Cohort Studies > DISCUSSION
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [5] Bak AA Grobbee DE The effect on serum cholesterol levels of coffee brewed by filtering or boiling N Engl J Med 1989 321 1432 1437 2811958 source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“However, this analysis was based on a case-control study conducted in Costa Rico and the results have not been replicated in prospective cohort studies yet.”
§ Long-Term Coffee Consumption and Risk of Cardiovascular Disease: A Systematic Review and a Dose-Response Meta-Analysis of Prospective Cohort Studies > DISCUSSION
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [47] Cornelis MC El-Sohemy A Kabagambe EK Campos H Coffee, cyp1a2 genotype, and risk of myocardial infarction JAMA 2006 295 1135 1141 16522833 source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“A study by Cornelis MC et al.47 showed that CYP1A2 genotype was an effect modifier between coffee consumption and risk of myocardial infarction: coffee consumption was related to higher risk of myocardial infarction for the slow caffeine metabolizer, and was not related to myocardial infarction for the fast caffeine metabolizer.”
§ Long-Term Coffee Consumption and Risk of Cardiovascular Disease: A Systematic Review and a Dose-Response Meta-Analysis of Prospective Cohort Studies > DISCUSSION
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [47] Cornelis MC El-Sohemy A Kabagambe EK Campos H Coffee, cyp1a2 genotype, and risk of myocardial infarction JAMA 2006 295 1135 1141 16522833 source
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Results from case crossover studies suggest that coffee consumption transiently increases risk of nonfatal myocardial infarction, ischemic stroke onset, and sudden cardiac death.44–46”
§ Long-Term Coffee Consumption and Risk of Cardiovascular Disease: A Systematic Review and a Dose-Response Meta-Analysis of Prospective Cohort Studies > DISCUSSION
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [44] Baylin A Hernandez-Diaz S Kabagambe EK Siles X Campos H Transient exposure to coffee as a trigger of a first nonfatal myocardial infarction Epidemiology 2006 17 506 511 16837823 source
- Not checked yetcites [45] Selb Semerl J Selb K Coffee and alcohol consumption as triggering factors for sudden cardiac death: Case-crossover study Croat Med J 2004 45 775 780 15578815
- Not checked yetcites [46] Mostofsky E Schlaug G Mukamal KJ Rosamond WD Mittleman MA Coffee and acute ischemic stroke onset: The stroke onset study Neurology 2010 75 1583 1588 20881275 PMC3120108 source
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“a previous meta-analysis summarizing 21 prospective cohort studies31 found no association between moderate coffee consumption and CHD risk in the overall population.”
§ Long-Term Coffee Consumption and Risk of Cardiovascular Disease: A Systematic Review and a Dose-Response Meta-Analysis of Prospective Cohort Studies > DISCUSSION
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [31] Wu JN Ho SC Zhou C Ling WH Chen WQ Wang CL Chen YM Coffee consumption and risk of coronary heart diseases: A meta-analysis of 21 prospective cohort studies Int JCardiol 2009 137 216 225 18707777 source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Second, smoking is likely to be an important confounder for the association between coffee consumption and CVD risk, and could bias the relative risks upwards.”
§ Long-Term Coffee Consumption and Risk of Cardiovascular Disease: A Systematic Review and a Dose-Response Meta-Analysis of Prospective Cohort Studies > DISCUSSION
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Long-term heavy coffee consumption has been associated with a slightly elevated risk of hypertension,40 and a higher level of plasma homocysteine.41, 42”
§ Long-Term Coffee Consumption and Risk of Cardiovascular Disease: A Systematic Review and a Dose-Response Meta-Analysis of Prospective Cohort Studies > DISCUSSION
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [40] Zhang Z Hu G Caballero B Appel L Chen L Habitual coffee consumption and risk of hypertension: A systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective observational studies Am JClin Nutr 2011 93 1212 1219 21450934 source
- Not checked yetcites [41] Verhoef P Pasman WJ Van Vliet T Urgert R Katan MB Contribution of caffeine to the homocysteine-raising effect of coffee: A randomized controlled trial in humans Am J Clin Nutr 2002 76 1244 1248 12450889 source
- Not checked yetcites [42] Olthof MR Hollman PC Zock PL Katan MB Consumption of high doses of chlorogenic acid, present in coffee, or of black tea increases plasma total homocysteine concentrations in humans Am J Clin Nutr 2001 73 532 538 11237928 source
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“However, short-term metabolic studies have shown that caffeine can acutely increase blood pressure by antagonizing the adenosine A1 and A2A receptor,35–37 and could also acutely adversely affect arterial stiffness and endothelium dependent vasodilation.38, 39”
§ Long-Term Coffee Consumption and Risk of Cardiovascular Disease: A Systematic Review and a Dose-Response Meta-Analysis of Prospective Cohort Studies > DISCUSSION
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [35] Nurminen ML Niittynen L Korpela R Vapaatalo H Coffee, caffeine and blood pressure: A critical review Eur J Clin Nutr 1999 53 831 839 10556993 source
- Not checked yetcites [36] Mesas AE Leon-Munoz LM Rodriguez-Artalejo F Lopez-Garcia E The effect of coffee on blood pressure and cardiovascular disease in hypertensive individuals: A systematic review and meta-analysis Am J Clin Nutr 2011 94 1113 1126 21880846 source
- Not checked yetcites [37] Fredholm BB Battig K Holmen J Nehlig A Zvartau EE Actions of caffeine in the brain with special reference to factors that contribute to its widespread use Pharmacol Rev 1999 51 83 133 10049999 source
- Not checked yetcites [38] Karatzis E Papaioannou TG Aznaouridis K Karatzi K Stamatelopoulos K Zampelas A Papamichael C Lekakis J Mavrikakis M. Acute effects of caffeine on blood pressure and wave reflections in healthy subjects: Should we consider monitoring central blood pressure? Int JCardiol 2005 98 425 430 15708175 source
- Not checked yetcites [39] Papamichael CM Aznaouridis KA Karatzis EN Karatzi KN Stamatelopoulos KS Vamvakou G Lekakis JP Mavrikakis ME Effect of coffee on endothelial function in healthy subjects: The role of caffeine Clin Sci (Lond) 2005 109 55 60 15799717 source
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“However, none of the included cohorts assessed the genotypes and thus we were unable to conduct such a stratified analysis.”
§ Long-Term Coffee Consumption and Risk of Cardiovascular Disease: A Systematic Review and a Dose-Response Meta-Analysis of Prospective Cohort Studies > DISCUSSION
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“First, coffee brewing methods have changed over time and nowadays the filter method has become more popular, effectively replacing unfiltered forms of coffee such as boiled coffee that was more widely consumed by participants in earlier studies.”
§ Long-Term Coffee Consumption and Risk of Cardiovascular Disease: A Systematic Review and a Dose-Response Meta-Analysis of Prospective Cohort Studies > DISCUSSION
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Since the true association between coffee consumption and CVD risk is likely to be modest and nonlinear, the differences in coffee assessments and covariate adjustments may result in changes the magnitude and even the direction of the associations and thus lead to different conclusions.”
§ Long-Term Coffee Consumption and Risk of Cardiovascular Disease: A Systematic Review and a Dose-Response Meta-Analysis of Prospective Cohort Studies > DISCUSSION
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“One possible reason is that the previous meta-analysis included 7 studies without adjustment for confounders, which might have biased the relative risks upwards because of confounding by factors such as smoking.”
§ Long-Term Coffee Consumption and Risk of Cardiovascular Disease: A Systematic Review and a Dose-Response Meta-Analysis of Prospective Cohort Studies > DISCUSSION
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [31] Wu JN Ho SC Zhou C Ling WH Chen WQ Wang CL Chen YM Coffee consumption and risk of coronary heart diseases: A meta-analysis of 21 prospective cohort studies Int JCardiol 2009 137 216 225 18707777 source
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“First, individuals with hypertension or other conditions related to CVD risk might have changed their coffee consumption before baseline. Thus, baseline disease, especially hypertension, as a confounder could result in reverse causation.”
§ Long-Term Coffee Consumption and Risk of Cardiovascular Disease: A Systematic Review and a Dose-Response Meta-Analysis of Prospective Cohort Studies > DISCUSSION
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The non-linear U-shaped between coffee consumption and CVD risk might also be true based on plausible biological mechanisms.”
§ Long-Term Coffee Consumption and Risk of Cardiovascular Disease: A Systematic Review and a Dose-Response Meta-Analysis of Prospective Cohort Studies > DISCUSSION
hedgedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Coffee consumption has been associated with higher insulin sensitivity, a lower risk of type 2 diabetes, and lower concentrations of inflammatory markers such as C-reactive protein and E-selectin.33, 34”
§ Long-Term Coffee Consumption and Risk of Cardiovascular Disease: A Systematic Review and a Dose-Response Meta-Analysis of Prospective Cohort Studies > DISCUSSION
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [33] van Dam RM Hu FB Coffee consumption and risk of type 2 diabetes: A systematic review JAMA 2005 294 97 104 15998896 source
- Not checked yetcites [34] Williams CJ Fargnoli JL Hwang JJ van Dam RM Blackburn GL Hu FB Mantzoros CS Coffee consumption is associated with higher plasma adiponectin concentrations in women with or without type 2 diabetes: A prospective cohort study Diabetes Care 2008 31 504 507 18070989 PMC2737446 source
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“A recent cohort study by Liu et al32 found that 4 cups per day of coffee consumption was associated with increased mortality, but the association was only significant for participants under 55 years old.”
§ Long-Term Coffee Consumption and Risk of Cardiovascular Disease: A Systematic Review and a Dose-Response Meta-Analysis of Prospective Cohort Studies > DISCUSSION
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [32] Liu J Sui X Lavie CJ Hebert JR Earnest CP Zhang J Blair SN Association of coffee consumption with all-cause and cardiovascular disease mortality Mayo Clin Proc 2013 88 1066 74 doi: 10.1016/j.mayocp.2013.06.020. Epub 2013 Aug 15 23953850 PMC3835155 source
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Case-control studies, which are prone to recall bias and selection bias, tended to show a positive association, whereas cohort studies generally showed a null association.10”
§ Long-Term Coffee Consumption and Risk of Cardiovascular Disease: A Systematic Review and a Dose-Response Meta-Analysis of Prospective Cohort Studies > DISCUSSION
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [10] Greenland S A meta-analysis of coffee, myocardial infarction, and coronary death Epidemiology 1993 4 366 374 8347748 source
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Second, in earlier studies, the sample size was typically small; the measurement of baseline characteristics was typically crude; statistical control of confounders such as diet was inadequate; and the average NOS study quality score was lower.”
§ Long-Term Coffee Consumption and Risk of Cardiovascular Disease: A Systematic Review and a Dose-Response Meta-Analysis of Prospective Cohort Studies > DISCUSSION
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The non-linear U-shaped between coffee consumption and risk of CVD might be due to a combination of beneficial and detrimental effects: for moderate coffee consumption, beneficial effects may be greater than adverse effects; whereas for heavy consumption, detrimental effect may counterbalance beneficial effects.”
§ Long-Term Coffee Consumption and Risk of Cardiovascular Disease: A Systematic Review and a Dose-Response Meta-Analysis of Prospective Cohort Studies > DISCUSSION
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“However, since higher coffee consumption was generally associated with a less healthy lifestyle such as a higher prevalence of cigarette smoking, less physical activity, and a less healthy diet, the observed association between moderate coffee consumption and a lower CVD risk is unlikely to be explained by these confounders.”
§ Long-Term Coffee Consumption and Risk of Cardiovascular Disease: A Systematic Review and a Dose-Response Meta-Analysis of Prospective Cohort Studies > DISCUSSION
hedged- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In addition, residual confounding by smoking may have biased the association for heavy coffee consumption upward, which may explain our finding that adjustment for smoking and other covariates actually strengthened the inverse association.”
§ Long-Term Coffee Consumption and Risk of Cardiovascular Disease: A Systematic Review and a Dose-Response Meta-Analysis of Prospective Cohort Studies > DISCUSSION
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Third, we used both semi-parametric and parametric methods, and both analyses indicated a U-shaped relationship between coffee consumption and CVD risk.”
§ Long-Term Coffee Consumption and Risk of Cardiovascular Disease: A Systematic Review and a Dose-Response Meta-Analysis of Prospective Cohort Studies > DISCUSSION
hedgedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“However, given coffee consumption habits in the studied populations most consumed coffee is likely to have been filtered coffee.”
§ Long-Term Coffee Consumption and Risk of Cardiovascular Disease: A Systematic Review and a Dose-Response Meta-Analysis of Prospective Cohort Studies > DISCUSSION
hedged- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Finally, we conducted stratified analyses according to disease endpoints, geographic locations of the studies, type of coffee, and baseline characteristics of the study populations. The subgroup results are highly consistent and robust.”
§ Long-Term Coffee Consumption and Risk of Cardiovascular Disease: A Systematic Review and a Dose-Response Meta-Analysis of Prospective Cohort Studies > DISCUSSION
boosted- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“First, our meta-analysis included 35 cohort studies and 1,283,685 participants, which provided sufficient power to detect modest associations.”
§ Long-Term Coffee Consumption and Risk of Cardiovascular Disease: A Systematic Review and a Dose-Response Meta-Analysis of Prospective Cohort Studies > DISCUSSION
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Second, because of the prospective design of all included studies, differential misclassification of coffee consumption due to recall bias was minimized and the likelihood of selection bias is reduced.”
§ Long-Term Coffee Consumption and Risk of Cardiovascular Disease: A Systematic Review and a Dose-Response Meta-Analysis of Prospective Cohort Studies > DISCUSSION
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper relies on this without support.
Coffee is one of the most widely consumed beverages around the world.
“Coffee is one of the most widely consumed beverages around the world; thus, investigating whether or not coffee consumption is associated with chronic disease risk has important public health implications.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The shape of the association between coffee consumption and cardiovascular disease risk remains uncertain.
“These meta-analyses did not support an association between coffee consumption and a higher CVD risk, but the shape of the association remains uncertain.”
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Compared with the lowest category of coffee consumption (median zero cups per day), the RRs of CHD were 0.89 (95 % CI = 0.85-0.94)for the first category (median 1.5 cups per day), 0.90 (95 % CI = 0.84-0.97)for the second category (median 3.5 cups per day) and 0.93 (95 % CI = 0.84-1.02)for the third category of coffee consumption (median five cups per day).”
From Scientific Opinion on the safety of caffeine (2015) · cites this paper as Ding et al., 2014
In the citing paper
“Coffee consumption was inversely associated with the risk of CVD up to eight cups per day.No association was observed between coffee consumption and CHD risk at higher intake.”
From Scientific Opinion on the safety of caffeine (2015) · cites this paper as Ding et al., 2014
In the citing paper
“In the dose-response analysis, coffee consumption was inversely associated with the risk of CVD up to six cups per day.”
From Scientific Opinion on the safety of caffeine (2015) · cites this paper as Ding et al. (2014)
In the citing paper
“No association was observed between coffee consumption of higher intakes and the risk of stroke.”
From Scientific Opinion on the safety of caffeine (2015) · cites this paper as Ding et al. (2014)
In the citing paper
“Coffee consumption up to about four cups per day was inversely associated with the risk of stroke.”
From Scientific Opinion on the safety of caffeine (2015) · cites this paper as Ding et al. (2014)
In the citing paper
“No association was observed between coffee consumption and CVD risk at higher intake.”
From Scientific Opinion on the safety of caffeine (2015) · cites this paper as Ding et al. (2014)
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.
Rated major: it would touch a result — a value a result rests on, reported and recomputed p-values on opposite sides of the significance level, two passages that conflict with no sign which is right, or a cited work retracted before this paper was published.
In the paper
§ Long-Term Coffee Consumption and Risk of Cardiovascular Disease: A Systematic Review and a Dose-Response Meta-Analysis of Prospective Cohort Studies > Abstract > Methods and Results
“Thirty-six studies were included with 1,279,804 participants and 36,352 CVD cases.”
§ Long-Term Coffee Consumption and Risk of Cardiovascular Disease: A Systematic Review and a Dose-Response Meta-Analysis of Prospective Cohort Studies > Results > Characteristics of studies
“The included studies comprised approximately 1,283,685 study participants and 47,779 CVD cases”
Citations
Cites
Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test
Egger, M., Smith, G. D., Schneider, M., & Minder, C. (1997) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.315.7109.629 · Cited by 56,722 · cited 1×
“We assessed the potential for publication bias using the Egger regression symmetry test.(25) All analyses were conducted with STATA version 11.”
Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology<SUBTITLE>A Proposal for Reporting</SUBTITLE>
Stroup, D. F. (2000) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.283.15.2008 · Cited by 20,623
(2014) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 17,633
Fredholm, B. B., Bättig, K., Holmén, J., Nehlig, A., & Zvartau, E. E. (1999) · Pharmacological Reviews · doi:10.1016/s0031-6997(24)01396-6 · Cited by 2,624
Methods for Trend Estimation from Summarized Dose-Response Data, with Applications to Meta-Analysis
Greenland, S., & Longnecker, M. P. (1992) · American Journal of Epidemiology · doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a116237 · Cited by 2,353 · cited 1×
“For the parametric method, a dose–response meta-analysis was performed.(24) The number of cases and participants in each coffee consumption category was extracted to estimate the covariance of the RR in each study.”
Robust variance estimation in meta‐regression with dependent effect size estimates
Hedges, L. V., Tipton, E., & Johnson, M. C. (2010) · Research Synthesis Methods · doi:10.1002/jrsm.5 · Cited by 2,086
Effects of Caffeine on Plasma Renin Activity, Catecholamines and Blood Pressure
Robertson, D., Frölich, J. C., Carr, R. K., Watson, J. T., Hollifield, J. W., Shand, D. G., & Oates, J. A. (1978) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm197801262980403 · Cited by 757 · cited 1×
“Short-term metabolic studies found that caffeine ingestion acutely induces cardiac arrhythmias and increases plasma renin activity, catecholamine concentrations, and blood pressure.(2,3) In the 1980s, cross-sectional studies found a positive association between coffee consumption and serum total cholesterol concentrat…”
Coffee Consumption and Risk of Type 2 Diabetes: A Systematic Review
van Dam, R. M., & Hu, F. B. (2005) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.294.1.97 · Cited by 662
Self-citationA Longitudinal Study of Coronary Heart Disease
Paul, O., Lepper, M. H., Phelan, W. H., DUPERTUIS, G. W., Macmillan, A., McKean, H. E., & Park, H.-B. (1963) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/01.cir.28.1.20 · Cited by 610 · cited 1×
“The relationship between coffee consumption and risk of coronary heart disease was first studied in the 1960s, given that the prevalences of both coffee drinking and coronary heart disease (CHD) were high in Western countries.(1) Short-term metabolic studies found that caffeine ingestion acutely induces cardiac arrhyt…”
Association of Coffee Drinking with Total and Cause-Specific Mortality
Freedman, N. D., Park, Y., Abnet, C. C., Hollenbeck, A. R., & Sinha, R. R. (2012) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa1112010 · Cited by 597
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 201–300 of 564
Amano, Y., Honda, H., Nukada, Y., Ikeda, N., Yamane, M., Nakano, K., Kameyama, A., & Morita, O. (2019) · Pharmaceuticals · doi:10.3390/ph12030110 · Cited by 26
“Some cohort studies reported that habitual drinkers of coffee have a low risk of high blood pressure [4], cardiovascular disease [5], and late-life cognitive impairment [6].”
Interpreting Coronary Artery Disease Risk Through Gene–Environment Interactions in Gene Regulation
Findley, A. S., Richards, A. L., Petrini, C., Alazizi, A., Doman, E. R., Shanku, A. G., Davis, G. O., Hauff, N., Sorokin, Y., Wen, X., et al. (2019) · Genetics · doi:10.1534/genetics.119.302419 · Cited by 24
Impact of coffee intake on human aging: Epidemiology and cellular mechanisms
Lopes, C. R., & Cunha, R. A. (2024) · Ageing Research Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.arr.2024.102581 · Cited by 26
Coffee and blood pressure: exciting news!
Borghi, C. (2022) · Blood Pressure · doi:10.1080/08037051.2022.2136621 · Cited by 24
“Coffee and cardiovascular diseases: What evidence Many observational cohort studies have analysed the relationship between coffee consumption and the incidence of cardiovascular events, reporting results that consistently suggest that an incremental consumption of up to 5 cups of filtered coffee per day is not associa…”
BackgroundCoffee Consumption and Cardiovascular Health
Chrysant, S. G. (2015) · The American Journal of Cardiology · doi:10.1016/j.amjcard.2015.05.057 · Cited by 24
Caffeine Consumption in a Group of Adolescents from South East Poland—A Cross Sectional Study
Błaszczyk-Bębenek, E., Jagielski, P., & Schlegel-Zawadzka, M. (2021) · Nutrients · doi:10.3390/nu13062084 · Cited by 22
“It was also shown to reduce the risk of neurological and cardiovascular diseases [3].”
BackgroundOliveira, R. D., Araújo, L. F., de Figueiredo, R. C., Goulart, A. C., Schmidt, M. I., Barreto, S. M., & Ribeiro, A. L. P. (2017) · Nutrients · doi:10.3390/nu9070741 · Cited by 23
“However, recent studies indicate a predominantly beneficial effect—especially when coffee is consumed moderately and for a long period of time [6].”
BackgroundTakahashi, K., & Ishigami, A. (2017) · Aging · doi:10.18632/aging.101287 · Cited by 23
Reprint of: Cardiovascular Disease Prevention by Diet Modification
Yu, E., Malik, V., & Hu, F. B. (2018) · Journal of the American College of Cardiology · doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2018.10.019 · Cited by 27
“Regular consumption of coffee has been consistently associated with lower risk of CVD, with the greatest risk reduction occurring at around 3 to 5 cups per day conferring an 11% lower risk (43).”
Self-citationThe impact of dietary interventions on cardiometabolic health
Gjermeni, E., Fiebiger, R., Bundalian, L., Garten, A., Schöneberg, T., Duc, D. L., & Blüher, M. (2025) · Cardiovascular Diabetology · doi:10.1186/s12933-025-02766-w · Cited by 27
“While early case–control studies suggested a positive association between coffee consumption and CHD risk, later prospective studies and meta-analyses have generally found no definitive association [121].”
Abe, S. K., Saito, E., Sawada, N., Tsugane, S., Ito, H. M., Lin, Y., Tamakoshi, A., Sado, J., Kitamura, Y. T., Sugawara, Y., et al. (2019) · Preventive Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.ypmed.2019.04.002 · Cited by 22
Liao, M., Gao, X., Yu, X., Zeng, Y., Li, S., Naicker, N., Joseph, T., Cao, W., Liu, Y., Zhu, S., et al. (2020) · British Journal Of Nutrition · doi:10.1017/s0007114520001075 · Cited by 22
“the median was estimated using themidpoint of the lower and upper limits and we considered that the highest/lowest category had the same intake or concentration range as the adjacent category when the highest/lowest category was open-ended(26,27).”
MethodLu, X., Zhu, X., Li, G., Wu, L., Shao, L., Fan, Y., Pan, C., Wu, Y., Borné, Y., & Ke, C. (2024) · The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism · doi:10.1210/clinem/dgae552 · Cited by 22
Decaffeinated coffee and its benefits on health: focus on systemic disorders
Colombo, R., & Papetti, A. (2020) · Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition · doi:10.1080/10408398.2020.1779175 · Cited by 24
Shu, X., Shu, X., Cai, H., et al. (2021) · Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention · doi:10.1158/1055-9965.epi-20-1633 · Cited by 21
Association between espresso coffee and serum total cholesterol: the Tromsø Study 2015–2016
Svatun, Å. L., Løchen, M., Thelle, D. S., & Wilsgaard, T. (2022) · Open Heart · doi:10.1136/openhrt-2021-001946 · Cited by 21
Senftinger, J., Nikorowitsch, J., Borof, K., Ojeda, F., Aarabi, G., Beikler, T., Mayer, C., Behrendt, C., Walther, C., Zyriax, B., et al. (2023) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-023-31857-5 · Cited by 22
Yu, Z., Parker, L., & Dummer, T. (2017) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-017-06529-w · Cited by 22
Azad, B. J., Heshmati, J., Daneshzad, E., & Palmowski, A. (2020) · Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition · doi:10.1080/10408398.2020.1750343 · Cited by 23
Lara-Guzmán, O. J., Medina, S., Álvarez, R., Oger, C., Durand, T., Galano, J., Zuluaga, N., Gil‐Izquierdo, Á., & Muñoz-Durango, K. (2020) · Free Radical Biology and Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2020.07.020 · Cited by 24
Hu, S., Song, J., Jiang, H., Wei, B., & Wang, H. (2025) · Frontiers in Nutrition · doi:10.3389/fnut.2025.1591799 · Cited by 21
Popiołek-Kalisz, J., Błaszczak, P., & Fornal, E. (2022) · Nutrients · doi:10.3390/nu14214586 · Cited by 20
“On the other hand, patients are often discouraged from drinking coffee, which is also a good source of flavonols, due to its potential negative impact on BP values, even though the recent studies do not confirm this [20].”
ResultTrends of caffeine intake from food and beverage among Chinese adults: 2004–2018
Ye, C., Xiao, X., Sui, H., Yang, D., Yong, L., & Song, Y. (2023) · Food and Chemical Toxicology · doi:10.1016/j.fct.2023.113629 · Cited by 20
Coffee Drinking and Associated Factors in an Elderly Population in Spain
Collado, L. T., de la Hera, M. G., Navarrete‐Muñoz, E. M., Gabucio, L. M. C., González‐Palacios, S., & Vioqué, J. (2018) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph15081661 · Cited by 19
“Current evidence suggests an inverse association between coffee consumption and the risk of some chronic diseases, such as hypertension [2,5,24,27,28] or even metabolic syndrome [29].”
BackgroundDocument of recommendations of the SEA 2018. Lifestyle in cardiovascular prevention
Pérez‐Jiménez, F., Pascual, V., Meco, J. F., Pérez‐Martínez, P., Delgado‐Lista, J., Doménech, M., Estruch, R., Leon‐Acuña, A., López‐Miranda, J., Sánchez-Ramos, A., et al. (2018) · Clínica e Investigación en Arteriosclerosis (English Edition) · doi:10.1016/j.artere.2018.11.001 · Cited by 21
Metabolomic Changes after Coffee Consumption: New Paths on the Block
Favari, C., Righetti, L., Tassotti, M., Gethings, L. A., Martini, D., Rosi, A., Antonini, M., Rubert, J., Manach, C., Dei, A., et al. (2020) · Molecular Nutrition & Food Research · doi:10.1002/mnfr.202000875 · Cited by 20
Coffee’s Impact on Health and Well-Being
Emadi, R. C., & Kamangar, F. (2025) · Nutrients · doi:10.3390/nu17152558 · Cited by 33
“Cardiovascular disease: A meta-analysis of 36 prospective human studies [26], which included nearly 1.3 million participants, found that cardiovascular disease risk was lowest among those who consumed 3–5 cups of coffee per day, corresponding to approximately 300 to 500 mg of caffeine per day, with…”
InfluentialNehlig, A., & Cunha, R. A. (2020) · Nutrients · doi:10.3390/nu12103141 · Cited by 19
Berretta, M., Micek, A., Lafranconi, A., Rossetti, S., Francia, R. D., Paoli, P. D., Rossi, P., & Facchini, G. (2018) · Oncotarget · doi:10.18632/oncotarget.24829 · Cited by 19
Role of the Aryl Hydrocarbon Receptor (AhR) in Mediating the Effects of Coffee in the Colon
Chapkin, R. S., Davidson, L. A., Park, H., Jin, U., Fan, Y., Cheng, Y., Hensel, M. E., Landrock, K. K., Allred, C. D., Menon, R., et al. (2021) · Molecular Nutrition & Food Research · doi:10.1002/mnfr.202100539 · Cited by 19
Akomolafe, S. F. (2017) · Journal of Food Biochemistry · doi:10.1111/jfbc.12401 · Cited by 19
Coffee and cardiovascular disease
Dewland, T. A., van Dam, R. M., & Marcus, G. M. (2025) · European Heart Journal · doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehaf421 · Cited by 18
Self-citationLee, D. B., Song, H. J., Paek, Y., et al. (2021) · Nutrients · doi:10.3390/nu14010087 · Cited by 18
“However, since the absorption of calcium in the intestine is estrogen-dependent, it can have different effects in postmenopausal women [29].”
BackgroundDoepker, C. L., Movva, N., Cohen, S. S., & Wikoff, D. S. (2022) · Food and Chemical Toxicology · doi:10.1016/j.fct.2022.113472 · Cited by 18
Zhou, H., Nie, J., Cao, Y., Diao, L., Zhang, X., Li, J., Chen, S., Zhang, X., Chen, G., Zhang, Z., et al. (2024) · BMC Public Health · doi:10.1186/s12889-024-18515-9 · Cited by 19
Elhadad, M. A., Karavasiloglou, N., Wulaningsih, W., Tsilidis, K. K., Tzoulaki, I., Patel, C. J., & Rohrmann, S. (2020) · Nutrients · doi:10.3390/nu12051470 · Cited by 17
“Furthermore, Mendelian randomization studies have shown no causal effect of coffee consumption on CVD or all-cause mortality; U-shaped associations were reported in observational studies [35,36].”
BackgroundInfluentialGebeyehu, G. M., Feleke, D. G., Molla, M. D., & Admasu, T. D. (2020) · Heliyon · doi:10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e04886 · Cited by 18
“The effect of long-term coffee consumption on lipid profile and its associated effect on the risks of CVD and other chronic metabolic disorders remains controversial (Malerba et al., 2013, Rebello and van Dam, 2013; Ding et al., 2014, Rodríguez-Artalejo and L opez-García, 2018).”
BackgroundCoffee: A Selected Overview of Beneficial or Harmful Effects on the Cardiovascular System?
Whayne, T. F. (2014) · Current Vascular Pharmacology · doi:10.2174/1570161112666141002121429 · Cited by 18
“performed an extensive and recent meta-analysis of coffee consumption over a long term.[26] They interpreted their meta-analysis as suggesting a nonlinear relationship between CV risk and the consumption of coffee.”
BackgroundWong, T. H. T., Sui, Z., Rangan, A., & Louie, J. C. Y. (2017) · European Journal of Nutrition · doi:10.1007/s00394-017-1488-x · Cited by 18
“Habitual coffee consumption has been associated with lower risk of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) [1, 2], cardiovascular diseases (CVD) [3], and all-cause mortality [4] in epidemiological studies.”
BackgroundCoffee, type 2 diabetes and pancreatic islet function – A mini-review
Costabile, A., Sarnsamak, K., & Hauge-Evans, A. C. (2018) · Journal of Functional Foods · doi:10.1016/j.jff.2018.04.011 · Cited by 18
Hao, W., Sung, L., Chen, C., Hong, H.-J., Liu, J., & Chen, J.-J. (2019) · The American Journal of Chinese Medicine · doi:10.1142/s0192415x19500162 · Cited by 17
The Relationship Between Caffeine Intake and Dry Eye Disease
Magnø, M. S., Utheim, T. P., Morthen, M. K., Snieder, H., Jansonius, N. M., Hammond, C. J., & Vehof, J. (2022) · Cornea · doi:10.1097/ico.0000000000002979 · Cited by 20
Gonçalinho, G. H. F., Nascimento, J. R. D. O., Mioto, B. M., Amato, R. V., Moretti, M. A., Strunz, C. M. C., César, L. A. M., & Mansur, A. D. P. (2022) · Journal of Clinical Medicine · doi:10.3390/jcm11112985 · Cited by 22
“Coffee is one of the most consumed beverages globally and moderate consumption (3 to 5 cups) is associated with cardiovascular protection [14,15].”
BackgroundStarling-Soares, B., Pereira, M., & Renke, G. (2023) · Nutrients · doi:10.3390/nu15245031 · Cited by 27
“…has demonstrated to be helpful in reducing the risk of cardiovascular diseases, the risk of gallstone formation, the risk of Parkinson’s disease development, the risk of depression and suicide, and the risk of cognitive decline, as well as being an adjuvant for headache treatment [63–68] (Table 3).”
BackgroundGene-Coffee Interactions and Health
Cornelis, M. C. (2014) · Current Nutrition Reports · doi:10.1007/s13668-014-0087-1 · Cited by 17
Effects of Aging and Diet on Cardioprotection and Cardiometabolic Risk Markers
Corina, A., Abrudan, M. B., Nikolic, D., Cătoi, A. F., Chianetta, R., Castellino, G., Citarrella, R., Stoian, A. P., Pérez‐Martínez, P., & Rizzo, M. (2019) · Current Pharmaceutical Design · doi:10.2174/1381612825666191105111232 · Cited by 19
Liu, Y.-T., Tantoh, D. M., Wang, L., Nfor, O. N., Hsu, S., Ho, C., Lung, C.-C., Chang, H., & Liaw, Y. (2020) · Nutrients · doi:10.3390/nu12051301 · Cited by 17
Nwabuo, C. C., Betoko, A. S., Reis, J. P., Moreira, H. T., Vasconcellos, H. D. D., Güallar, E., Cox, C., Sidney, S. S., Ambale‐Venkatesh, B., Lewis, C. E., et al. (2020) · ESC Heart Failure · doi:10.1002/ehf2.12684 · Cited by 18
Tallis, J. A., James, R. S., Cox, V. M., & Duncan, M. J. (2016) · The journal of nutrition health & aging · doi:10.1007/s12603-016-0832-9 · Cited by 17
“Although caffeine may increase blood pressure in non-habitual users, recent evidence demonstrated that heavy coffee consumption is not associated with an increased risk of coronary heart disease and that moderate consumption may actually negate this risk (13, 19).”
Coffee consumption in aged mice increases energy production and decreases hepatic mTOR levels
Takahashi, K., Yanai, S., Shimokado, K., & Ishigami, A. (2017) · Nutrition · doi:10.1016/j.nut.2016.12.021 · Cited by 17
“, a decreased risk of hepatocarcinoma [1] nd cardiovascular disease [2] and a reduced incidence of mild cognitive impairment (MCI ) [3].”
BackgroundCaffeine consumption and cardiovascular health
van Dam, R. M., & Hu, F. B. (2022) · Nature Reviews Cardiology · doi:10.1038/s41569-022-00719-4 · Cited by 18
Self-citationde Lavallaz, J. D. F., Mézier, J., Mertz, L., Mannhart, D., Serban, T., Knecht, S., Abid, Q., Nguyen, T. T., Kühne, M., Sticherling, C., et al. (2022) · Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology · doi:10.1007/s10840-022-01421-8 · Cited by 19
Abbel, D., Åsvold, B. O., Kolberg, M., Selbæk, G., Noordam, R., & Skjellegrind, H. K. (2023) · Nutrients · doi:10.3390/nu15112469 · Cited by 16
“Lastly, coffee consumption has been associated with reduced risk of several diseases, including Parkinson’s disease [44,45], diabetes [46,47], and cardiovascular disease [26,48].”
BackgroundFernández-Cardero, Á., Sierra-Cinos, J. L., Bravo, L., & Sarriá, B. (2024) · Nutrients · doi:10.3390/nu16172848 · Cited by 21
Mena, P. R., Tassotti, M., Martini, D., Rosi, A., Brighenti, F., & Rio, D. D. (2017) · Trials · doi:10.1186/s13063-017-2271-2 · Cited by 17
“Similarly, the non-linear U-shaped curve linking coffee consumption and cardiovascular disease (CVD) might be due to a combination of beneficial and detrimental effects [4, 14].”
BackgroundHabitual coffee consumption and risk of falls in 2 European cohorts of older adults
Machado‐Fragua, M. D., Struijk, E. A., Ballesteros, J.-M., Ortolá, R., Rodríguez‐Artalejo, F., & López‐García, E. (2018) · American Journal of Clinical Nutrition · doi:10.1093/ajcn/nqy369 · Cited by 19
Han, J., Shon, J., Hwang, J., & Park, Y. J. (2020) · Nutrients · doi:10.3390/nu12020493 · Cited by 16
The relationship of coffee consumption and CVD risk factors in elderly patients with T2DM
ghavami, H. S., Khoshtinat, M., Sadeghi-Farah, S., Kalimani, A. B., Ferrie, S., & Faraji, H. (2021) · BMC Cardiovascular Disorders · doi:10.1186/s12872-021-02058-7 · Cited by 19
Cardiovascular symptoms affect the patterns of habitual coffee consumption
Hyppönen, E., & Zhou, A. (2021) · American Journal of Clinical Nutrition · doi:10.1093/ajcn/nqab014 · Cited by 19
Coffee Consumption and the Risk of All-Cause and Cause-Specific Mortality in the Korean Population
Kim, S.-A., Tan, L., & Shin, S. (2021) · Journal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics · doi:10.1016/j.jand.2021.03.014 · Cited by 16
Acute effect of coffee drinking on dynamic cerebral autoregulation
Sasaki, H., Hirasawa, A., Washio, T., & Ogoh, S. (2016) · European Journal of Applied Physiology · doi:10.1007/s00421-016-3345-7 · Cited by 16
“In addition, some epidemiological studies indicate the existence of a U-shaped relationship between coffee consumption and both cardiovascular events and mortality (Ding et al. 2014).”
BackgroundCaffeine Consumption and Cardiovascular Risks: Little Cause for Concern
Wilson, P. W. F., & Bloom, H. L. (2016) · Journal of the American Heart Association · doi:10.1161/jaha.115.003089 · Cited by 16
“The authors concluded that coffee consumption was associated with both coronary heart disease and stroke; the lowest CVD risk occurred at 3–5 cups per day, and heavy coffee consumption was not associated with increased CVD risk.(11) A companion study by the same authors investigated mortality in 3 large prospective co…”
BackgroundSchaefer, S. M., Kaiser, A., Behrendt, I., Eichner, G., & Fasshauer, M. (2022) · British Journal Of Nutrition · doi:10.1017/s000711452200040x · Cited by 24
“type 2 diabetes mellitus(15), obesity(16), CVD(17), as well as liver and endometrial cancer(18).”
BackgroundEffect of Coffee on Lipopolysaccharide-Induced Immortalized Human Oral Keratinocytes
Song, J., Kim, B., Kim, O., Yang, Y., Liu, D., Fu, W., Ma, G., Kim, Y., & Kim, Y. (2022) · Foods · doi:10.3390/foods11152199 · Cited by 15
“Recent epidemiological evidence suggests that coffee consumption decreases the risk of cardiovascular disease [4], mortality [5], chronic liver disease [6], type 2 diabetes [7], Parkinson’s disease [8], and some specific cancers [9–11].”
BackgroundCoffee intake and risk of diabetic nephropathy: a Mendelian randomization study
Fang, J., Song, K., Zhang, D., Liang, Y., Zhao, H., Jin, J., & He, Q. (2023) · Frontiers in Endocrinology · doi:10.3389/fendo.2023.1169933 · Cited by 15
Liu, Y., Miao, M.-Y., Wang, J., Tang, Q., Han, W.-W., Jia, Y., Tao, H.-W., Zheng, Y., van Dam, R. M., Qin, L., et al. (2023) · Nutrients · doi:10.3390/nu15183910 · Cited by 18
“An Inverse relationship of coffee consumption with risk of CVD has been widely reported in previous prospective studies conducted in the general population [8].”
Self-citationBeverages – a scoping review for Nordic Nutrition Recommendations 2023
Sonestedt, E., & Lukic, M. (2024) · Food & Nutrition Research · doi:10.29219/fnr.v68.10458 · Cited by 16
Targeted proteomic analysis of habitual coffee consumption
Cornelis, M. C., Gustafsson, S., Ärnlöv, J., Elmståhl, S., Söderberg, S., Sundström, J., Michaëlsson, K., Lind, L., & Ingelsson, E. (2017) · Journal of Internal Medicine · doi:10.1111/joim.12703 · Cited by 15
Bebidas cafeínadas energizantes: efectos neurológicos y cardiovasculares
Universidad, C. E. S., Manrique, C., Hoyos, C. L. A., Universidad, C. E. S., Pareja, D. A. G., & Universidad, C. E. S. (2018) · IATREIA · doi:10.17533/udea.iatreia.v31n1a06 · Cited by 18
Kinetic and Dynamic Description of Caffeine
Alsabri, S. G., Mari, W., Younes, S., Alsadawi, M. A., & Oroszi, T. L. (2017) · Journal of Caffeine and Adenosine Research · doi:10.1089/jcr.2017.0011 · Cited by 67
Coffee Drinking and Adverse Physical Outcomes in the Aging Adult Population: A Systematic Review
Mazeaud, S., Castellana, F., Coelho‐Júnior, H. J., Panza, F., Rondanelli, M., Fassio, F., Pergola, G. D., Zupo, R., & Sardone, R. (2022) · Metabolites · doi:10.3390/metabo12070654 · Cited by 15
“Improvements in a wide variety of health outcomes due to exposure to coffee consumption have already been described in the literature, including lower mortality, weight, cancer, diabetes, or patterns of markers of inflammation and insulin resistance [14,19–22], often showing a dose-dependent relationship [23].”
BackgroundAssociation between coffee consumption and risk of renal cell carcinoma: a meta‐analysis
Wijarnpreecha, K., Thongprayoon, C., Thamcharoen, N., Panjawatanan, P., & Cheungpasitporn, W. (2017) · Internal Medicine Journal · doi:10.1111/imj.13621 · Cited by 16
Foods, dietary patterns, and risk of vascular dementia: a systematic review
Griffiths, A., Matu, J., Tang, E. Y. H., Gregory, S., Anderson, E. L., Fairley, A., Townsend, R., Stevenson, E., Stephan, B. C. M., Siervo, M., et al. (2024) · Nutrition & Metabolism · doi:10.1186/s12986-024-00880-2 · Cited by 16
A universal plasma metabolites-derived signature predicts cardiovascular disease risk in MAFLD
Li, Z., Gong, R., Chu, H., Zeng, J., Chen, C., Xu, S., Hu, L., Gao, W., Li, Z., Yuan, H., et al. (2024) · Atherosclerosis · doi:10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2024.117526 · Cited by 15
Österreichischer Blutdruckkonsens 2019
Hypertensiologie, Ö. G. F., Weber, T., Atherosklerosegesellschaft, Ö., Gesellschaft, Ö. D., Angiologie, Ö. G. F. I., Nephrologie, Ö. G. F., Gesellschaft, Ö. K., Neurologie, Ö. G. F., Schlaganfall-Gesellschaft, Ö., Allgemeinmedizin, Ö. G. F., et al. (2019) · Wiener klinische Wochenschrift · doi:10.1007/s00508-019-01565-0 · Cited by 15
Verlinden, V. J. A., Maksimovic, A., Mirza, S. S., Ikram, M. A., Jong, J. C. K., Hofman, A., Franco, O. H., Tiemeier, H. W., & van der Geest, J. N. (2015) · European Journal of Clinical Nutrition · doi:10.1038/ejcn.2015.120 · Cited by 14
Wang, Y., Liu, Y., Liu, L., Hong, L., & Chen, H. Q. (2023) · Cardiology Research and Practice · doi:10.1155/2023/5586403 · Cited by 19
Thorpe, H. H. A., Fontanillas, P., Pham, B. K., Meredith, J. J., Jennings, M. V., Courchesne‐Krak, N. S., Vilar‐Ribó, L., Bianchi, S. B., Mutz, J., Aslibekyan, S. W., et al. (2024) · Neuropsychopharmacology · doi:10.1038/s41386-024-01870-x · Cited by 13
Hepatitis B virus infection and decreased risk of stroke: a meta-analysis
Wang, Y., Xiong, J., Chen, X., Niu, M., Chen, X., Guan, Y., Zheng, K., & Xu, K. (2017) · Oncotarget · doi:10.18632/oncotarget.19609 · Cited by 13
Coffee consumption and risk of hearing impairment in men and women
Machado‐Fragua, M. D., Struijk, E. A., Yévenes‐Briones, H., Caballero, F. F., Rodríguez‐Artalejo, F., & López‐García, E. (2020) · Clinical Nutrition · doi:10.1016/j.clnu.2020.11.022 · Cited by 13
da Costa, M. S., Pontes, K. S. D. S., Guedes, M. R., Silva, M. I. B., & Klein, M. R. S. T. (2023) · Clinical Nutrition · doi:10.1016/j.clnu.2023.08.004 · Cited by 14
Documento de consenso SEA/SEMERGEN 2019. Recomendaciones dietéticas en la prevención cardiovascular
Pascual, V., Pérez‐Martínez, P., Fernández, J. M., Solà, R., Pallarés‐Carratalá, V., Secin, A. A. R., Jiménez, F. P., & Ros, E. (2019) · Medicina de Familia SEMERGEN · doi:10.1016/j.semerg.2019.02.015 · Cited by 13
Wong, T. H. T., Burlutsky, G., Gopinath, B., Flood, V. M., Mitchell, P. L. R., & Louie, J. C. Y. (2022) · Journal of Nutritional Science · doi:10.1017/jns.2022.78 · Cited by 12
“The null findings in this regard also implied that the inverse associations between coffee consumption and T2DM((41)) and CVD incidence((42)) were not due to improvements in biomarkers, thereby strengthening the argument that residual confounding could be behind these results((43)).”
BackgroundChlorogenic Acid and Caffeine in Coffee Restore Insulin Signaling in Pancreatic Beta Cells.
Ihara, Y., Asahara, S., Inoue, H., Seike, M., Ando, M., Kabutoya, H., Kimura-Koyanagi, M., & Kido, Y. (2023) · PubMed Central · doi:10.24546/0100480554 · Cited by 12
Pietzner, M., Köhrle, J., Lehmphul, I., Budde, K., Kastenmüller, G., Brabant, G., Völzke, H., Artati, A., Adamski, J., Völker, U., et al. (2019) · Thyroid® · doi:10.1089/thy.2018.0549 · Cited by 13
“Indeed, a systemic and organ-specific improvement of the detoxification capacity might explain the reduced cancer risk associated with coffee consumption, as well as the significant inverse association between moderate coffee drinking and CVD risk (62).”
BackgroundManolis, A. S., Manolis, T. A., Apostolopoulos, E. J., Melita, H., & Manolis, A. S. (2021) · Current Medicinal Chemistry · doi:10.2174/0929867328666210708091709 · Cited by 12
Caffeine ingestion alters central hemodynamics following aerobic exercise in middle-aged men
Harber, M. P., McCurry, A., Carlini, N., Kistler, B., & Fleenor, B. S. (2021) · European Journal of Applied Physiology · doi:10.1007/s00421-020-04521-3 · Cited by 11
From cup to clock: exploring coffee's role in slowing down biological aging
Chen, X., Yin, X., Gao, Y., Chen, X., Ye, N., & He, X. (2024) · Food & Function · doi:10.1039/d3fo04177h · Cited by 13
Caffeine: a potential mechanism for anti-obesity
Wang, M., Guo, W. Y., & Chen, J. (2024) · Purinergic Signalling · doi:10.1007/s11302-024-10022-1 · Cited by 13
“While 400 mg/day of caffeine is considered safe for the average person [41], previous research demonstrated that the long-term consumption of 400–600 mg/day of caffeine can prevent CVD and significantly reduce the risk of cardiovascular mortality [42–44].”
Coffee and Cardiovascular Health: A Review of Literature
Farraj, A., Akeredolu, T., Wijeyesekera, A., & Mills, C. E. (2024) · Nutrients · doi:10.3390/nu16244257 · Cited by 15
Curioni, C. C., da Silva, A. C. F., Pereira, A. D. S., & Mocellin, M. C. (2022) · Integrated science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-85357-0_5 · Cited by 13
Tang, L., Yang, L., Chen, W., Li, C., Zeng, Y., Yang, H., Hu, Y., Qu, Y., Song, H., Zeng, X., et al. (2022) · Chinese Medical Journal · doi:10.1097/cm9.0000000000002234 · Cited by 11
Sun, Y., Liu, B., Snetselaar, L. G., Wallace, R. B., Shadyab, A. H., Chen, G., Shikany, J. M., Manson, J. E., & Bao, W. (2022) · Journal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics · doi:10.1016/j.jand.2022.12.007 · Cited by 11
Simon, T. G., Trejo, M. E. P., Zeb, I., Wood, A. C., McClelland, R. L., Chung, R. T., & Budoff, M. J. (2017) · Metabolism · doi:10.1016/j.metabol.2017.06.007 · Cited by 11
Coffee consumption and risk of aortic valve stenosis: A prospective study
Larsson, S. C., Wolk, A., Håkansson, N., & Bäck, M. (2018) · Nutrition Metabolism and Cardiovascular Diseases · doi:10.1016/j.numecd.2018.01.016 · Cited by 11
Notara, V., Panagiotakos, D. B., Kouvari, M., Tzanoglou, D., Kouli, G., Mantas, Y., Kogias, Y., Stravopodis, P., Papanagnou, G., Zombolos, S., et al. (2015) · International Journal of Food Sciences and Nutrition · doi:10.3109/09637486.2015.1077795 · Cited by 11
“…no association between CVD and coffee intake (Loomba et al., 2014; Malerba et al., 2013) or a cardioprotective role of moderate coffee consumption through a dose–response relation (Crippa et al., 2014; Ding et al., 2014b; Larsson & Orsini, 2011; Mostofsky et al., 2012; Panagiotakos et al., 2003).”
BackgroundDietary management of dyslipidemia
Chopra, A. K. (2023) · Indian Heart Journal · doi:10.1016/j.ihj.2023.12.005 · Cited by 13
Copp, K. L., Steffen, L. M., Yi, S.-Y. Y., Lutsey, P. L., Rebholz, C. M., & Rooney, M. R. (2024) · European Journal of Preventive Cardiology · doi:10.1093/eurjpc/zwae251 · Cited by 11
Wang, B., Ma, T., Yang, L., He, S., Li, J., & Sun, X. (2024) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-024-71426-y · Cited by 11
Caffeine plays a prevention role in stress-induced depression by modulating gut-brain axis function
Wu, W., Wang, J., Chen, J., Xie, J., Ke Cheng, X. U., Ren, Y., Zhong, Q., He, F., Wang, Y., & Xie, P. (2025) · European Journal of Pharmacology · doi:10.1016/j.ejphar.2025.177721 · Cited by 10
Metadata
- Authors
- Ding, M., Bhupathiraju, S. N., Satija, A., van Dam, R. M., & Hu, F. B.
- Affiliations
- Brigham and Women's Hospital (US)
- From the Departments of Nutrition (M.D., S.N.B., A.S., R.M.v.D., F.B.H.) and Epidemiology (F.B.H.), Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, MA; Saw Swee Hock School of Public Health and Department of Medicine, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore and National University Health System, Singapore (R.M.v.D.); and Channing Division of Network Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA (F.B.H.).
- Venue
- Circulation
- Published
- 2014-02-11
- Volume
- 129
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 643-659
- ISSN
- 0009-7322 (ISSN-L)
- 1524-4539
- PMC
- PMC3945962
- OpenAlex
- W2137201442
- Cited by
- 565
- References
- 74
- Citations by year
- 2026: 29 · 2025: 49 · 2024: 64 · 2023: 45 · 2022: 56 · 2021: 43 · 2020: 54 · 2019: 34 · 2018: 51 · 2017: 51 · 2016: 41 · 2015: 30 · 2014: 17
- FWCI
- 21.82
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- Circulation (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- National University of Singapore (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (HL60712, R01HL060712)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology (medical) › Coffee research and impacts
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Nutritional Studies and Diet
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Alcohol Consumption and Health Effects
- Keywords
- coffee consumption, cardiovascular risk, coronary artery disease, stroke, heart failure, cardiovascular mortality, dose-response relationship, nonlinear relationship
- MeSH terms
- Cardiovascular Diseases, Coffee, Coronary Disease, Heart Failure, Humans, Prospective Studies, Risk Factors, Nonlinear Dynamics, Stroke
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-10-10, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).
A second model labelled each claim on 2026-10-10 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review