The DOI matches its Crossref record, with a small difference in title or year; 74 of the 74 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; none of the 41 sources its claims cite is checked for support yet.
Long-Term Coffee Consumption and Risk of Cardiovascular Disease: A Systematic Review and a Dose–Response Meta-Analysis of Prospective Cohort Studies
Open accessAbstract
Background—: Considerable controversy exists on the association between coffee consumption and cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk. A meta-analysis was performed to assess the dose–response relationship of long-term coffee consumption with CVD risk. Methods and Results—: PubMed and EMBASE were searched for prospective cohort studies of the relationship between coffee consumption and CVD risk, which included coronary heart disease, stroke, heart failure, and CVD mortality. Thirty-six studies were included with 1 279 804 participants and 36 352 CVD cases. A nonlinear relationship of coffee consumption with CVD risk was identified ( P for heterogeneity=0.09, P for trend <0.001, P for nonlinearity <0.001). Compared with the lowest category of coffee consumption (median, 0 cups per day), the relative risk of CVD was 0.95 (95% confidence interval, 0.87–1.03) for the highest category (median, 5 cups per day) category, 0.85 (95% confidence interval, 0.80–0.90) for the second highest category (median, 3.5 cups per day), and 0.89 (95% confidence interval, 0.84–0.94) for the third highest category (median, 1.5 cups per day). Looking at separate outcomes, coffee consumption was nonlinearly associated with both coronary heart disease ( P for heterogeneity=0.001, P for trend <0.001, P for nonlinearity <0.001) and stroke ( P for heterogeneity=0.07, P for trend <0.001, P for nonlinearity <0.001; P for trend differences >0.05) risks. Conclusions—: A nonlinear association between coffee consumption and CVD risk was observed in this meta-analysis. Moderate coffee consumption was inversely significantly associated with CVD risk, with the lowest CVD risk at 3 to 5 cups per day, and heavy coffee consumption was not associated with elevated CVD risk.
Overview
AI snapshot
Written from the paper’s full text.
TL;DR
This systematic review and dose–response meta-analysis found a non-linear, U-shaped association between long-term coffee consumption and cardiovascular disease risk, with the lowest risk at 3 to 5 cups/day. Moderate coffee consumption was inversely associated with CVD, CHD, and stroke, while heavy consumption was not associated with elevated CVD risk.
Key findings
- Compared with the lowest coffee consumption category (median 0 cups/day), pooled relative risks for CVD were 0.89 (95% CI, 0.84–0.94) for the third highest category (median 1.5 cups/day), 0.85 (95% CI, 0.80–0.90) for the second highest category (median 3.5 cups/day), and 0.95 (95% CI, 0.87–1.03) for the highest category (median 5 cups/day).
- In the dose–response spline model, RRs versus no coffee consumption were 0.95 (0.93–0.97) at 1 cup/day, 0.92 (0.88–0.95) at 2 cups/day, 0.89 (0.85–0.93) at 3 cups/day, 0.88 (0.83–0.93) at 4 cups/day, 0.89 (0.83–0.95) at 5 cups/day, 0.91 (0.84–0.99) at 6 cups/day, and 0.93 (0.85–1.03) at 7 cups/day.
- Non-linear associations with significant trends were found for both CHD and stroke; heterogeneity was stronger for CHD (P for heterogeneity = 0.001) than for stroke (P for heterogeneity = 0.07).
- Stratified analyses found no significant interactions between categorized coffee consumption and baseline hypertension/MI, smoking status, publication year, NOS quality score, dietary assessment method, outcome, country, sex, or coffee type (all P for interactions > 0.05). Egger tests did not suggest publication bias.
Methods
- Systematic review and dose–response meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies, following the MOOSE protocol; PubMed and EMBASE were searched from January 1966 to March 2013.
- The abstract reports 36 included studies with 1,279,804 participants and 36,352 CVD cases; the Results and Discussion report approximately 1,283,685 participants and 47,779 CVD cases, including 28,347 CHD, 12,030 stroke, and 7,402 other CVD cases. The main analysis included 35 studies, and 29 studies were included in the dose–response analysis.
- Analyses used semi-parametric and parametric methods, random- or fixed-effects models, generalized least squares, and restricted cubic splines with 3 knots; stratified analyses and Egger’s regression symmetry test were also performed.
Limitations
- The paper states that, given the observational nature of included studies, residual confounding cannot be excluded and a causal relationship cannot be established; residual confounding by smoking may have biased heavy coffee consumption upward.
- The paper states that coffee brewing methods were not assessed, so results may not apply to unfiltered coffee (e.g., French press, Scandinavian boiled, or Turkish/Greek coffee).
- The paper states that none of the included cohorts assessed CYP1A2 genotype, so genotype-stratified analysis was not possible. Evident from the text: participant and CVD case counts differ between the abstract and the Results/Discussion sections.
Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
39 Own result · 23 Not checked yet · 17 Own interpretation · 14 Own method · 8 No basis given · 1 Sources not found
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“the imputed correlation coefficient between the risks of stroke and CHD within the same cohort (0 < ρ ≤ 1) did not have an effect on the relative risk of CVD for each category of coffee consumption.”
§ Long-Term Coffee Consumption and Risk of Cardiovascular Disease: A Systematic Review and a Dose-Response Meta-Analysis of Prospective Cohort Studies > Results > Coffee consumption and risk of CVD
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“0.90 (95% CI, 0.84 to 0.97; P for heterogeneity = 0.02; I2 = 40.3%) for the second highest category”
§ Long-Term Coffee Consumption and Risk of Cardiovascular Disease: A Systematic Review and a Dose-Response Meta-Analysis of Prospective Cohort Studies > Results > Stratified analyses
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“0.85 (95% CI, 0.80 to 0.90) for the second highest (median: 3.5 cups/d; mean: 3 cups/d)”
- Also stated in: § Methods and Results · plain
“0.85 (0.80 to 0.90) for the second highest (median: 3.5 cups/d)”
§ Long-Term Coffee Consumption and Risk of Cardiovascular Disease: A Systematic Review and a Dose-Response Meta-Analysis of Prospective Cohort Studies > Results > Coffee consumption and risk of CVD
plaincorrelationaln = 36,352- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Also stated in: § Methods and Results · plain
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“the RR of CVD was 0.96 (95% CI, 0.65 to 1.42) for age < 65 years”
§ Long-Term Coffee Consumption and Risk of Cardiovascular Disease: A Systematic Review and a Dose-Response Meta-Analysis of Prospective Cohort Studies > Results > Stratified analyses
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [27] Klatsky AL Friedman GD Armstrong MA Coffee use prior to myocardial infarction restudied: Heavier intake may increase the risk Am J Epidemiol 1990 132 479 488 2389752 source
- Not checked yetcites [28] Lindsted KD Kuzma JW Anderson JL Coffee consumption and cause-specific mortality. Association with age at death and compression of mortality J Clin Epidemiol 1992 45 733 742 1619453 source
- Not checked yetcites [29] Bidel S Hu G Qiao Q Jousilahti P Antikainen R Tuomilehto J Coffee consumption and risk of total and cardiovascular mortality among patients with type 2 diabetes Diabetologia 2006 49 2618 2626 17019600 source
- Not checked yetcites [30] Greenberg JA Dunbar CC Schnoll R Kokolis R Kokolis S Kassotis J Caffeinated beverage intake and the risk of heart disease mortality in the elderly: A prospective analysis AmJ Clin Nutr 2007 85 392 398 17284734 source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“No interactions between categorized coffee consumption and stratification variables in relation to CVD risk were observed (all P for interactions >0.05)”
§ Long-Term Coffee Consumption and Risk of Cardiovascular Disease: A Systematic Review and a Dose-Response Meta-Analysis of Prospective Cohort Studies > Results > Stratified analyses
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“0.80 (95% CI, 0.75 to 0.86; P for heterogeneity = 0.37; I2 = 6.5%) for the second category”
§ Long-Term Coffee Consumption and Risk of Cardiovascular Disease: A Systematic Review and a Dose-Response Meta-Analysis of Prospective Cohort Studies > Results > Stratified analyses
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“the RRs of CHD were 0.89 (95% CI, 0.85 to 0.94; P for heterogeneity = 0.83; I2 = 0.0%) for the third highest category”
§ Long-Term Coffee Consumption and Risk of Cardiovascular Disease: A Systematic Review and a Dose-Response Meta-Analysis of Prospective Cohort Studies > Results > Stratified analyses
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“0.95 (95% CI, 0.87 to 1.03) for the highest (median: 5 cups/d; mean: 5.5 cups/d) category of coffee consumption”
- Also stated in: § Methods and Results · plain
“0.95 (95% CI, 0.87 to 1.03) for the highest (median: 5 cups/d) category”
§ Long-Term Coffee Consumption and Risk of Cardiovascular Disease: A Systematic Review and a Dose-Response Meta-Analysis of Prospective Cohort Studies > Results > Coffee consumption and risk of CVD
plainn = 36,352- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Also stated in: § Methods and Results · plain
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“0.92 (95% CI, 0.88 to 0.95) for 2 cups/d”
§ Long-Term Coffee Consumption and Risk of Cardiovascular Disease: A Systematic Review and a Dose-Response Meta-Analysis of Prospective Cohort Studies > Results > Dose-response analysis of coffee consumption with risk of CVD
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“0.89 (95% CI, 0.85 to 0.93) for 3 cups/d”
§ Long-Term Coffee Consumption and Risk of Cardiovascular Disease: A Systematic Review and a Dose-Response Meta-Analysis of Prospective Cohort Studies > Results > Dose-response analysis of coffee consumption with risk of CVD
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- It may state two separate claims as one. 32
- Probably not a substantial claim. 20
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“we observed a non-linear association between coffee consumption and risk of CVD (P for non-linearity < 0.001) with a significant trend (P for trend <0.001) and limited heterogeneity in study results (P for heterogeneity = 0.09)”
- Also stated in: § Methods and Results · plain
“A non-linear relationship of coffee consumption with CVD risk was identified (P for heterogeneity = 0.09, P for trend < 0.001, P for non-linearity < 0.001).”
- Also stated in: § Conclusions · plain
“A non-linear association between coffee consumption with CVD risk was observed in this meta-analysis.”
§ Long-Term Coffee Consumption and Risk of Cardiovascular Disease: A Systematic Review and a Dose-Response Meta-Analysis of Prospective Cohort Studies > Results > Dose-response analysis of coffee consumption with risk of CVD
plaincorrelationaln = 36,352 ·- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Also stated in: § Methods and Results · plain
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Thirty-six studies remained in the meta-analysis (Figure 1).”
§ Long-Term Coffee Consumption and Risk of Cardiovascular Disease: A Systematic Review and a Dose-Response Meta-Analysis of Prospective Cohort Studies > Results > Characteristics of studies
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The included studies comprised approximately 1,283,685 study participants and 47,779 CVD cases, including 28,347 CHD cases, 12,030 stroke cases and 7,402 other CVD cases.”
§ Long-Term Coffee Consumption and Risk of Cardiovascular Disease: A Systematic Review and a Dose-Response Meta-Analysis of Prospective Cohort Studies > Results > Characteristics of studies
plainn = 47,779- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Our results remained largely unchanged and non-linear curves were found with including either CHD or stroke as the outcome”
§ Long-Term Coffee Consumption and Risk of Cardiovascular Disease: A Systematic Review and a Dose-Response Meta-Analysis of Prospective Cohort Studies > Results > Sensitivity analysis
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Since the vast majority of our participants were Caucasians, the allele frequency was expected to be consistent across various cohorts.”
§ Long-Term Coffee Consumption and Risk of Cardiovascular Disease: A Systematic Review and a Dose-Response Meta-Analysis of Prospective Cohort Studies > DISCUSSION
hedged- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“After adjustment for smoking and other covariates, heavy coffee was consumption was not significantly associated with CVD and the inverse association between moderate consumption and CVD became stronger.”
§ Long-Term Coffee Consumption and Risk of Cardiovascular Disease: A Systematic Review and a Dose-Response Meta-Analysis of Prospective Cohort Studies > DISCUSSION
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“One author (M. D.) assessed study eligibility and extracted the data, the other author (A. S.) independently double-checked the available data.”
§ Long-Term Coffee Consumption and Risk of Cardiovascular Disease: A Systematic Review and a Dose-Response Meta-Analysis of Prospective Cohort Studies > INTRODUCTION > Data extraction and quality assessment
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“We assessed the potential for publication bias using Egger's regression symmetry test.25”
§ Long-Term Coffee Consumption and Risk of Cardiovascular Disease: A Systematic Review and a Dose-Response Meta-Analysis of Prospective Cohort Studies > INTRODUCTION > Data Synthesis and Analysis
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [25] Egger M Davey Smith G Schneider M Minder C Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test BMJ 1997 315 629 634 9310563 PMC2127453 source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Sensitivity analysis was conducted by imputing different ρ (0 < ρ ≤ 1) to evaluate the robustness of the effect estimates.”
§ Long-Term Coffee Consumption and Risk of Cardiovascular Disease: A Systematic Review and a Dose-Response Meta-Analysis of Prospective Cohort Studies > INTRODUCTION > Data Synthesis and Analysis
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“The Newcastle-Ottawa quality assessment scale (NOS) 22was used to evaluate the quality of the included studies.”
§ Long-Term Coffee Consumption and Risk of Cardiovascular Disease: A Systematic Review and a Dose-Response Meta-Analysis of Prospective Cohort Studies > INTRODUCTION > Data extraction and quality assessment
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites [22] Wells GA SB O'Connell D Peterson J Welch V Losos M Tugwell P The newcastle-ottawa scale (nos) for assessing the quality of nonrandomized studies in meta-analysis 2011 www.ohri.ca/programs/clinical_epidemiology/oxford.asp
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Not matched
In the paper
“one recent meta-analysis paper showed that heavy coffee consumption was not associated with risk of CVD mortality.20”
§ Long-Term Coffee Consumption and Risk of Cardiovascular Disease: A Systematic Review and a Dose-Response Meta-Analysis of Prospective Cohort Studies > INTRODUCTION
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [20] Malerba S Turati F Galeone C Pelucchi C Verga F La Vecchia C Tavani A A meta-analysis of prospective studies of coffee consumption and mortality for all causes, cancers and cardiovascular diseases Eur J Epidemiol 2013 28 527 39 doi: 10.1007/s10654-013-9834-7. Epub 2013 Aug 11 23934579 source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
In the paper
“We followed the Meta-Analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology21 protocol throughout the design, implementation, analysis, and reporting of our meta-analysis.”
§ Long-Term Coffee Consumption and Risk of Cardiovascular Disease: A Systematic Review and a Dose-Response Meta-Analysis of Prospective Cohort Studies > INTRODUCTION > Methods
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [21] Stroup DF Berlin JA Morton SC Olkin I Williamson GD Rennie D Moher D Becker BJ Sipe TA Thacker SB Meta-analysis of observational studies in epidemiology: A proposal for reporting. Meta-analysis of observational studies in epidemiology (moose) group JAMA 2000 283 2008 2012 10789670 source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“We searched the PubMed and EMBASE databases for prospective studies that had evaluated the association between coffee consumption and risk of CVD between January 1966 and March 2013.”
§ Long-Term Coffee Consumption and Risk of Cardiovascular Disease: A Systematic Review and a Dose-Response Meta-Analysis of Prospective Cohort Studies > INTRODUCTION > Search strategy and selection criteria
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The scores of the NOS quality assessment ranged from 3 to 8, and 31 studies had scores of 5 or higher.”
§ Long-Term Coffee Consumption and Risk of Cardiovascular Disease: A Systematic Review and a Dose-Response Meta-Analysis of Prospective Cohort Studies > Results > Characteristics of studies
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Possible reasons for this discrepancy include a relatively small size, lack of updated dietary assessment, and subgroup analysis.”
§ Long-Term Coffee Consumption and Risk of Cardiovascular Disease: A Systematic Review and a Dose-Response Meta-Analysis of Prospective Cohort Studies > DISCUSSION
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [32] Liu J Sui X Lavie CJ Hebert JR Earnest CP Zhang J Blair SN Association of coffee consumption with all-cause and cardiovascular disease mortality Mayo Clin Proc 2013 88 1066 74 doi: 10.1016/j.mayocp.2013.06.020. Epub 2013 Aug 15 23953850 PMC3835155 source
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Recently, a genome-wide association study (GWAS) found a highly significant association between a variant on CYP1A2 and coffee intake48.”
§ Long-Term Coffee Consumption and Risk of Cardiovascular Disease: A Systematic Review and a Dose-Response Meta-Analysis of Prospective Cohort Studies > DISCUSSION
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [48] Cornelis MC Monda KL Yu K Paynter N Azzato EM Bennett SN Berndt SI Boerwinkle E Chanock S Chatterjee N Couper D Curhan G Heiss G Hu FB Hunter DJ Jacobs K Jensen MK Kraft P Landi MT Nettleton JA Purdue MP Rajaraman P Rimm EB Rose LM Rothman N Silverman D Stolzenberg-Solomon R Subar A Yeager M Chasman DI van Dam RM Caporaso NE Genome-wide meta-analysis identifies regions on 7p21 (ahr) and 15q24 (cyp1a2) as determinants of habitual caffeine consumption PLoS Genet 2011 7 e1002033 21490707 PMC3071630 source
boostedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“First, the consumption of decaffeinated coffee was much lower than caffeinated coffee, diminishing the power to detect any association.”
§ Long-Term Coffee Consumption and Risk of Cardiovascular Disease: A Systematic Review and a Dose-Response Meta-Analysis of Prospective Cohort Studies > DISCUSSION
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“It has been shown that drinking boiled coffee increases serum cholesterol, an important risk factor for CVD5.”
§ Long-Term Coffee Consumption and Risk of Cardiovascular Disease: A Systematic Review and a Dose-Response Meta-Analysis of Prospective Cohort Studies > DISCUSSION
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [5] Bak AA Grobbee DE The effect on serum cholesterol levels of coffee brewed by filtering or boiling N Engl J Med 1989 321 1432 1437 2811958 source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“However, this analysis was based on a case-control study conducted in Costa Rico and the results have not been replicated in prospective cohort studies yet.”
§ Long-Term Coffee Consumption and Risk of Cardiovascular Disease: A Systematic Review and a Dose-Response Meta-Analysis of Prospective Cohort Studies > DISCUSSION
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [47] Cornelis MC El-Sohemy A Kabagambe EK Campos H Coffee, cyp1a2 genotype, and risk of myocardial infarction JAMA 2006 295 1135 1141 16522833 source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“A study by Cornelis MC et al.47 showed that CYP1A2 genotype was an effect modifier between coffee consumption and risk of myocardial infarction: coffee consumption was related to higher risk of myocardial infarction for the slow caffeine metabolizer, and was not related to myocardial infarction for the fast caffeine metabolizer.”
§ Long-Term Coffee Consumption and Risk of Cardiovascular Disease: A Systematic Review and a Dose-Response Meta-Analysis of Prospective Cohort Studies > DISCUSSION
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [47] Cornelis MC El-Sohemy A Kabagambe EK Campos H Coffee, cyp1a2 genotype, and risk of myocardial infarction JAMA 2006 295 1135 1141 16522833 source
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Results from case crossover studies suggest that coffee consumption transiently increases risk of nonfatal myocardial infarction, ischemic stroke onset, and sudden cardiac death.44–46”
§ Long-Term Coffee Consumption and Risk of Cardiovascular Disease: A Systematic Review and a Dose-Response Meta-Analysis of Prospective Cohort Studies > DISCUSSION
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [44] Baylin A Hernandez-Diaz S Kabagambe EK Siles X Campos H Transient exposure to coffee as a trigger of a first nonfatal myocardial infarction Epidemiology 2006 17 506 511 16837823 source
- Not checked yetcites [45] Selb Semerl J Selb K Coffee and alcohol consumption as triggering factors for sudden cardiac death: Case-crossover study Croat Med J 2004 45 775 780 15578815
- Not checked yetcites [46] Mostofsky E Schlaug G Mukamal KJ Rosamond WD Mittleman MA Coffee and acute ischemic stroke onset: The stroke onset study Neurology 2010 75 1583 1588 20881275 PMC3120108 source
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“a previous meta-analysis summarizing 21 prospective cohort studies31 found no association between moderate coffee consumption and CHD risk in the overall population.”
§ Long-Term Coffee Consumption and Risk of Cardiovascular Disease: A Systematic Review and a Dose-Response Meta-Analysis of Prospective Cohort Studies > DISCUSSION
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [31] Wu JN Ho SC Zhou C Ling WH Chen WQ Wang CL Chen YM Coffee consumption and risk of coronary heart diseases: A meta-analysis of 21 prospective cohort studies Int JCardiol 2009 137 216 225 18707777 source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Second, smoking is likely to be an important confounder for the association between coffee consumption and CVD risk, and could bias the relative risks upwards.”
§ Long-Term Coffee Consumption and Risk of Cardiovascular Disease: A Systematic Review and a Dose-Response Meta-Analysis of Prospective Cohort Studies > DISCUSSION
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Long-term heavy coffee consumption has been associated with a slightly elevated risk of hypertension,40 and a higher level of plasma homocysteine.41, 42”
§ Long-Term Coffee Consumption and Risk of Cardiovascular Disease: A Systematic Review and a Dose-Response Meta-Analysis of Prospective Cohort Studies > DISCUSSION
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [40] Zhang Z Hu G Caballero B Appel L Chen L Habitual coffee consumption and risk of hypertension: A systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective observational studies Am JClin Nutr 2011 93 1212 1219 21450934 source
- Not checked yetcites [41] Verhoef P Pasman WJ Van Vliet T Urgert R Katan MB Contribution of caffeine to the homocysteine-raising effect of coffee: A randomized controlled trial in humans Am J Clin Nutr 2002 76 1244 1248 12450889 source
- Not checked yetcites [42] Olthof MR Hollman PC Zock PL Katan MB Consumption of high doses of chlorogenic acid, present in coffee, or of black tea increases plasma total homocysteine concentrations in humans Am J Clin Nutr 2001 73 532 538 11237928 source
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“However, short-term metabolic studies have shown that caffeine can acutely increase blood pressure by antagonizing the adenosine A1 and A2A receptor,35–37 and could also acutely adversely affect arterial stiffness and endothelium dependent vasodilation.38, 39”
§ Long-Term Coffee Consumption and Risk of Cardiovascular Disease: A Systematic Review and a Dose-Response Meta-Analysis of Prospective Cohort Studies > DISCUSSION
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [35] Nurminen ML Niittynen L Korpela R Vapaatalo H Coffee, caffeine and blood pressure: A critical review Eur J Clin Nutr 1999 53 831 839 10556993 source
- Not checked yetcites [36] Mesas AE Leon-Munoz LM Rodriguez-Artalejo F Lopez-Garcia E The effect of coffee on blood pressure and cardiovascular disease in hypertensive individuals: A systematic review and meta-analysis Am J Clin Nutr 2011 94 1113 1126 21880846 source
- Not checked yetcites [37] Fredholm BB Battig K Holmen J Nehlig A Zvartau EE Actions of caffeine in the brain with special reference to factors that contribute to its widespread use Pharmacol Rev 1999 51 83 133 10049999 source
- Not checked yetcites [38] Karatzis E Papaioannou TG Aznaouridis K Karatzi K Stamatelopoulos K Zampelas A Papamichael C Lekakis J Mavrikakis M. Acute effects of caffeine on blood pressure and wave reflections in healthy subjects: Should we consider monitoring central blood pressure? Int JCardiol 2005 98 425 430 15708175 source
- Not checked yetcites [39] Papamichael CM Aznaouridis KA Karatzis EN Karatzi KN Stamatelopoulos KS Vamvakou G Lekakis JP Mavrikakis ME Effect of coffee on endothelial function in healthy subjects: The role of caffeine Clin Sci (Lond) 2005 109 55 60 15799717 source
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“However, none of the included cohorts assessed the genotypes and thus we were unable to conduct such a stratified analysis.”
§ Long-Term Coffee Consumption and Risk of Cardiovascular Disease: A Systematic Review and a Dose-Response Meta-Analysis of Prospective Cohort Studies > DISCUSSION
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“First, coffee brewing methods have changed over time and nowadays the filter method has become more popular, effectively replacing unfiltered forms of coffee such as boiled coffee that was more widely consumed by participants in earlier studies.”
§ Long-Term Coffee Consumption and Risk of Cardiovascular Disease: A Systematic Review and a Dose-Response Meta-Analysis of Prospective Cohort Studies > DISCUSSION
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Since the true association between coffee consumption and CVD risk is likely to be modest and nonlinear, the differences in coffee assessments and covariate adjustments may result in changes the magnitude and even the direction of the associations and thus lead to different conclusions.”
§ Long-Term Coffee Consumption and Risk of Cardiovascular Disease: A Systematic Review and a Dose-Response Meta-Analysis of Prospective Cohort Studies > DISCUSSION
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“One possible reason is that the previous meta-analysis included 7 studies without adjustment for confounders, which might have biased the relative risks upwards because of confounding by factors such as smoking.”
§ Long-Term Coffee Consumption and Risk of Cardiovascular Disease: A Systematic Review and a Dose-Response Meta-Analysis of Prospective Cohort Studies > DISCUSSION
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [31] Wu JN Ho SC Zhou C Ling WH Chen WQ Wang CL Chen YM Coffee consumption and risk of coronary heart diseases: A meta-analysis of 21 prospective cohort studies Int JCardiol 2009 137 216 225 18707777 source
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“First, individuals with hypertension or other conditions related to CVD risk might have changed their coffee consumption before baseline. Thus, baseline disease, especially hypertension, as a confounder could result in reverse causation.”
§ Long-Term Coffee Consumption and Risk of Cardiovascular Disease: A Systematic Review and a Dose-Response Meta-Analysis of Prospective Cohort Studies > DISCUSSION
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The non-linear U-shaped between coffee consumption and CVD risk might also be true based on plausible biological mechanisms.”
§ Long-Term Coffee Consumption and Risk of Cardiovascular Disease: A Systematic Review and a Dose-Response Meta-Analysis of Prospective Cohort Studies > DISCUSSION
hedgedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Coffee consumption has been associated with higher insulin sensitivity, a lower risk of type 2 diabetes, and lower concentrations of inflammatory markers such as C-reactive protein and E-selectin.33, 34”
§ Long-Term Coffee Consumption and Risk of Cardiovascular Disease: A Systematic Review and a Dose-Response Meta-Analysis of Prospective Cohort Studies > DISCUSSION
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [33] van Dam RM Hu FB Coffee consumption and risk of type 2 diabetes: A systematic review JAMA 2005 294 97 104 15998896 source
- Not checked yetcites [34] Williams CJ Fargnoli JL Hwang JJ van Dam RM Blackburn GL Hu FB Mantzoros CS Coffee consumption is associated with higher plasma adiponectin concentrations in women with or without type 2 diabetes: A prospective cohort study Diabetes Care 2008 31 504 507 18070989 PMC2737446 source
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“A recent cohort study by Liu et al32 found that 4 cups per day of coffee consumption was associated with increased mortality, but the association was only significant for participants under 55 years old.”
§ Long-Term Coffee Consumption and Risk of Cardiovascular Disease: A Systematic Review and a Dose-Response Meta-Analysis of Prospective Cohort Studies > DISCUSSION
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [32] Liu J Sui X Lavie CJ Hebert JR Earnest CP Zhang J Blair SN Association of coffee consumption with all-cause and cardiovascular disease mortality Mayo Clin Proc 2013 88 1066 74 doi: 10.1016/j.mayocp.2013.06.020. Epub 2013 Aug 15 23953850 PMC3835155 source
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Case-control studies, which are prone to recall bias and selection bias, tended to show a positive association, whereas cohort studies generally showed a null association.10”
§ Long-Term Coffee Consumption and Risk of Cardiovascular Disease: A Systematic Review and a Dose-Response Meta-Analysis of Prospective Cohort Studies > DISCUSSION
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [10] Greenland S A meta-analysis of coffee, myocardial infarction, and coronary death Epidemiology 1993 4 366 374 8347748 source
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Second, in earlier studies, the sample size was typically small; the measurement of baseline characteristics was typically crude; statistical control of confounders such as diet was inadequate; and the average NOS study quality score was lower.”
§ Long-Term Coffee Consumption and Risk of Cardiovascular Disease: A Systematic Review and a Dose-Response Meta-Analysis of Prospective Cohort Studies > DISCUSSION
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The non-linear U-shaped between coffee consumption and risk of CVD might be due to a combination of beneficial and detrimental effects: for moderate coffee consumption, beneficial effects may be greater than adverse effects; whereas for heavy consumption, detrimental effect may counterbalance beneficial effects.”
§ Long-Term Coffee Consumption and Risk of Cardiovascular Disease: A Systematic Review and a Dose-Response Meta-Analysis of Prospective Cohort Studies > DISCUSSION
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“However, since higher coffee consumption was generally associated with a less healthy lifestyle such as a higher prevalence of cigarette smoking, less physical activity, and a less healthy diet, the observed association between moderate coffee consumption and a lower CVD risk is unlikely to be explained by these confounders.”
§ Long-Term Coffee Consumption and Risk of Cardiovascular Disease: A Systematic Review and a Dose-Response Meta-Analysis of Prospective Cohort Studies > DISCUSSION
hedged- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In addition, residual confounding by smoking may have biased the association for heavy coffee consumption upward, which may explain our finding that adjustment for smoking and other covariates actually strengthened the inverse association.”
§ Long-Term Coffee Consumption and Risk of Cardiovascular Disease: A Systematic Review and a Dose-Response Meta-Analysis of Prospective Cohort Studies > DISCUSSION
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Third, we used both semi-parametric and parametric methods, and both analyses indicated a U-shaped relationship between coffee consumption and CVD risk.”
§ Long-Term Coffee Consumption and Risk of Cardiovascular Disease: A Systematic Review and a Dose-Response Meta-Analysis of Prospective Cohort Studies > DISCUSSION
hedgedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“However, given coffee consumption habits in the studied populations most consumed coffee is likely to have been filtered coffee.”
§ Long-Term Coffee Consumption and Risk of Cardiovascular Disease: A Systematic Review and a Dose-Response Meta-Analysis of Prospective Cohort Studies > DISCUSSION
hedged- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Finally, we conducted stratified analyses according to disease endpoints, geographic locations of the studies, type of coffee, and baseline characteristics of the study populations. The subgroup results are highly consistent and robust.”
§ Long-Term Coffee Consumption and Risk of Cardiovascular Disease: A Systematic Review and a Dose-Response Meta-Analysis of Prospective Cohort Studies > DISCUSSION
boosted- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“First, our meta-analysis included 35 cohort studies and 1,283,685 participants, which provided sufficient power to detect modest associations.”
§ Long-Term Coffee Consumption and Risk of Cardiovascular Disease: A Systematic Review and a Dose-Response Meta-Analysis of Prospective Cohort Studies > DISCUSSION
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Second, because of the prospective design of all included studies, differential misclassification of coffee consumption due to recall bias was minimized and the likelihood of selection bias is reduced.”
§ Long-Term Coffee Consumption and Risk of Cardiovascular Disease: A Systematic Review and a Dose-Response Meta-Analysis of Prospective Cohort Studies > DISCUSSION
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper relies on this without support.
Coffee is one of the most widely consumed beverages around the world.
“Coffee is one of the most widely consumed beverages around the world; thus, investigating whether or not coffee consumption is associated with chronic disease risk has important public health implications.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The shape of the association between coffee consumption and cardiovascular disease risk remains uncertain.
“These meta-analyses did not support an association between coffee consumption and a higher CVD risk, but the shape of the association remains uncertain.”
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Compared with the lowest category of coffee consumption (median zero cups per day), the RRs of CHD were 0.89 (95 % CI = 0.85-0.94)for the first category (median 1.5 cups per day), 0.90 (95 % CI = 0.84-0.97)for the second category (median 3.5 cups per day) and 0.93 (95 % CI = 0.84-1.02)for the third category of coffee consumption (median five cups per day).”
From Scientific Opinion on the safety of caffeine (2015) · cites this paper as Ding et al., 2014
In the citing paper
“Coffee consumption was inversely associated with the risk of CVD up to eight cups per day.No association was observed between coffee consumption and CHD risk at higher intake.”
From Scientific Opinion on the safety of caffeine (2015) · cites this paper as Ding et al., 2014
In the citing paper
“In the dose-response analysis, coffee consumption was inversely associated with the risk of CVD up to six cups per day.”
From Scientific Opinion on the safety of caffeine (2015) · cites this paper as Ding et al. (2014)
In the citing paper
“No association was observed between coffee consumption of higher intakes and the risk of stroke.”
From Scientific Opinion on the safety of caffeine (2015) · cites this paper as Ding et al. (2014)
In the citing paper
“Coffee consumption up to about four cups per day was inversely associated with the risk of stroke.”
From Scientific Opinion on the safety of caffeine (2015) · cites this paper as Ding et al. (2014)
In the citing paper
“No association was observed between coffee consumption and CVD risk at higher intake.”
From Scientific Opinion on the safety of caffeine (2015) · cites this paper as Ding et al. (2014)
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.
Rated major: it would touch a result — a value a result rests on, reported and recomputed p-values on opposite sides of the significance level, two passages that conflict with no sign which is right, or a cited work retracted before this paper was published.
In the paper
§ Long-Term Coffee Consumption and Risk of Cardiovascular Disease: A Systematic Review and a Dose-Response Meta-Analysis of Prospective Cohort Studies > Abstract > Methods and Results
“Thirty-six studies were included with 1,279,804 participants and 36,352 CVD cases.”
§ Long-Term Coffee Consumption and Risk of Cardiovascular Disease: A Systematic Review and a Dose-Response Meta-Analysis of Prospective Cohort Studies > Results > Characteristics of studies
“The included studies comprised approximately 1,283,685 study participants and 47,779 CVD cases”
Citations
Cites
Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test
Egger, M., Smith, G. D., Schneider, M., & Minder, C. (1997) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.315.7109.629 · Cited by 56,722 · cited 1×
“We assessed the potential for publication bias using the Egger regression symmetry test.(25) All analyses were conducted with STATA version 11.”
Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology<SUBTITLE>A Proposal for Reporting</SUBTITLE>
Stroup, D. F. (2000) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.283.15.2008 · Cited by 20,623
(2014) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 17,633
Fredholm, B. B., Bättig, K., Holmén, J., Nehlig, A., & Zvartau, E. E. (1999) · Pharmacological Reviews · doi:10.1016/s0031-6997(24)01396-6 · Cited by 2,624
Methods for Trend Estimation from Summarized Dose-Response Data, with Applications to Meta-Analysis
Greenland, S., & Longnecker, M. P. (1992) · American Journal of Epidemiology · doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a116237 · Cited by 2,353 · cited 1×
“For the parametric method, a dose–response meta-analysis was performed.(24) The number of cases and participants in each coffee consumption category was extracted to estimate the covariance of the RR in each study.”
Robust variance estimation in meta‐regression with dependent effect size estimates
Hedges, L. V., Tipton, E., & Johnson, M. C. (2010) · Research Synthesis Methods · doi:10.1002/jrsm.5 · Cited by 2,086
Effects of Caffeine on Plasma Renin Activity, Catecholamines and Blood Pressure
Robertson, D., Frölich, J. C., Carr, R. K., Watson, J. T., Hollifield, J. W., Shand, D. G., & Oates, J. A. (1978) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm197801262980403 · Cited by 757 · cited 1×
“Short-term metabolic studies found that caffeine ingestion acutely induces cardiac arrhythmias and increases plasma renin activity, catecholamine concentrations, and blood pressure.(2,3) In the 1980s, cross-sectional studies found a positive association between coffee consumption and serum total cholesterol concentrat…”
Coffee Consumption and Risk of Type 2 Diabetes: A Systematic Review
van Dam, R. M., & Hu, F. B. (2005) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.294.1.97 · Cited by 662
Self-citationA Longitudinal Study of Coronary Heart Disease
Paul, O., Lepper, M. H., Phelan, W. H., DUPERTUIS, G. W., Macmillan, A., McKean, H. E., & Park, H.-B. (1963) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/01.cir.28.1.20 · Cited by 610 · cited 1×
“The relationship between coffee consumption and risk of coronary heart disease was first studied in the 1960s, given that the prevalences of both coffee drinking and coronary heart disease (CHD) were high in Western countries.(1) Short-term metabolic studies found that caffeine ingestion acutely induces cardiac arrhyt…”
Association of Coffee Drinking with Total and Cause-Specific Mortality
Freedman, N. D., Park, Y., Abnet, C. C., Hollenbeck, A. R., & Sinha, R. R. (2012) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa1112010 · Cited by 597
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 401–500 of 564
Moderate coffee intake and cardiovascular health; no grounds for concern
Tzoulaki, I. (2018) · Nutrition Metabolism and Cardiovascular Diseases · doi:10.1016/j.numecd.2018.05.007 · Cited by 3
Lifestyle Modification: Diet, Exercise, Sports and Other Issues
Owens, D. S. (2014) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-4471-4956-9_12 · Cited by 3
Oxidation of olive oil fortified with quercetin, caffeic acid, tyrosol and hydroxytyrosol
Etherton, A. K., & Omaye, S. T. (2015) · Nutrition & Food Science · doi:10.1108/nfs-09-2014-0083 · Cited by 3
Levels of caffeine and its metabolites among U.S. smokers and nonsmokers
Jain, R. B. (2015) · Environmental Toxicology and Pharmacology · doi:10.1016/j.etap.2015.02.002 · Cited by 3
Neues aus der Schlaganfallmedizin
Diener, H., Frank, B., Hajjar, K., & Weimar, C. (2014) · Der Nervenarzt · doi:10.1007/s00115-014-4036-4 · Cited by 3
More Evidence That Caffeine Consumption Appears to Be Safe in Patients With Heart Failure
Kelly, J. P., & Granger, C. B. (2016) · JAMA Internal Medicine · doi:10.1001/jamainternmed.2016.6381 · Cited by 3
The effect of diet, lifestyle and psychological factors in the prognosis of ischemic heart failure
Σαλούρου, Μ., Archontakis, S., Sideris, S. K., Parissis, I., Siasos, G., Oikonomou, E. K., Mourouzis, K., Sideris, K., Stefanadis, C., & Tousoulis, D. M. (2019) · Metabolism Open · doi:10.1016/j.metop.2019.03.001 · Cited by 3
“Authors suggest that coffee consumption and cardiovascular prognosis follows a J-shape curvewith small andmoderate consumption being beneficial and excessive consumption becoming detrimental [22,25].”
BackgroundCoffee: Health effects and various disease treatments
Vo, T. S., Vo, T. T. B. C., & Vo, T. T. T. N. (2022) · Food and Health · doi:10.3153/fh22032 · Cited by 3
“Recently, several researches have indicated a significantly reduced risk of cardiovascular disease and type 2 diabetes in coffee drinkers (Ding et al., 2014).”
BackgroundLi, J., Choudhury, T., Zhang, M., Chen, L., Wen, J., Liu, W., & Chen, P. (2021) · medRxiv · doi:10.1101/2021.03.08.21253114 · Cited by 3
Golzarand, M., Estaki, S., Mirmiran, P., & Azizi, F. (2024) · Nutrition & Metabolism · doi:10.1186/s12986-024-00798-9 · Cited by 2
“…0.73–0.85, I 2 = 40%, n = 10) for every three-servings/day increase in whole grain intake [28], 0.89 (95% CI: 0.84–0.94, n = 35) for every 1.5 cup/day coffee drink [29], and 0.81 (95% CI: 0.70–0.92, I 2 = 73%, n = 3) for the highest category of walnut intake compared with the lowest category [30].”
BackgroundInfluentialDaneshzad, E., Noormohammadi, Z., Basirat, V., Qorbani, M., Bellissimo, N., & Azadbakht, L. (2025) · Journal of Diabetes & Metabolic Disorders · doi:10.1007/s40200-025-01592-x · Cited by 2
“Apart from water, tea is one of the most commonly consumed beverages and has a variety of health benefits and disease-preventing effects [ 9, 10].”
Jia, Q., Zha, Z., Li, S., Zhang, Y., Ke, L., & Liu, S. (2025) · Food Science & Nutrition · doi:10.1002/fsn3.70439 · Cited by 2
Hizar, S. A. K., Mamat, H., Pindi, W., Julmohammad, N. B., Amin, S. F. M., Awang, M. A., Roslan, J., Zaini, M. A. A., Putra, N. R., Jaziri, A. A., et al. (2025) · Sci · doi:10.3390/sci7040139 · Cited by 2
Al-Garni, A. M., Abudasser, A. M., Alqahtani, R. A., Almousa, M., Alshahrani, O. M. O., Alshabab, S. Q. A., Algahtany, A. M., Alshafea, Y. S., Alshehri, M. K., Alqahtani, Y. M., et al. (2025) · Journal of Family Medicine and Primary Care · doi:10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_249_25 · Cited by 2
“[13,14] The Health, Alcohol and Psychosocial factors In Eastern Europe study (HAPIEE) study found that consuming three to four coffee cups per day was associated with reduced mortality in a group of women and men.”
Caffeine as a cardiovascular protective agent: a comprehensive review of mechanisms and outcomes
Awashra, A., AbuBaha, M., Mahafdah, B., Sarama, A., Alattar, D., Abubaha, B., Abu-Khazneh, O., Emara, A., Milhem, A., Elgendy, M. S., et al. (2026) · European journal of medical research · doi:10.1186/s40001-026-04089-2 · Cited by 2
Caffeine and Cardiovascular Outcomes: Current Evidence and Clinical Perspectives
Neshat, N., Frishman, W. H., & Aronow, W. S. (2026) · Cardiology in Review · doi:10.1097/crd.0000000000001252 · Cited by 2
Indian spices and Caffeine treatment for Obesity and Cardiovascular disease
Martins, I. J. (2017) · Annals of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism · doi:10.29328/journal.acem.1001005 · Cited by 2
“Caffeine and its metabolism is critical to cardiovascular disease [50-52] with Indian spice intake (mg/day) now important with relevance to”
BackgroundBochenek, H., Krga, I., Sergi, D., Kouvari, M., Zec, M. M., & Naumovski, N. (2022) · Reviews in Cardiovascular Medicine · doi:10.31083/j.rcm2301041 · Cited by 2
Yaghoobian, R., Sharifi, M. N., Rezaee, M., Vahidi, H., Salehi, N., & Hosseini, K. (2023) · Critical Pathways in Cardiology A Journal of Evidence-Based Medicine · doi:10.1097/hpc.0000000000000322 · Cited by 2
Is Coffee and Tea a Threat or Ally to Cardiovascular Health?
Mendpara, V. A., Garg, S., Shah, P., Bhavsar, J., Anamika, F., Patel, M. A., Munjal, R. S., Gupta, V., Garg, N., & Jain, R. (2023) · Cureus · doi:10.7759/cureus.49991 · Cited by 3
“Recent studies illustrate a non-dose response relationship between caffeine intake and cardiovascular risk [61].”
BackgroundEldakhakhny, B. M., Enani, S. M., Jambi, H., Ajabnoor, G., Al-Ahmadi, J., Al-Raddadi, R. M., Alsheikh, L., Abdulaal, W. H., Gad, H., Borai, A., et al. (2023) · Biomedicines · doi:10.3390/biomedicines11123242 · Cited by 3
“Several studies reported that coffee consumption may exert beneficial metabolic effects, and long-term coffee consumption has been associated with a decreased risk of type 2 diabetes [101,102] and cardiovascular disease [103].”
Enjoy or quit: impact of coffee on cardiac and metabolic health
Güneş, Y., & Aktaş, G. (2024) · Cardiology Plus · doi:10.1097/cp9.0000000000000092 · Cited by 2
“…coffee also contains more than one hundred bioactive compounds apart from caffeine, such as phenolic compounds, chlorogenic acids, tannin, thiamin, spermidine, quinides, trigonelline, lig-nins, and minerals like potassium and magnesium, which may also contribute to its effects on the body [1–4] .”
InfluentialChmurzyńska, A. (2024) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-443-13868-3.00053-3 · Cited by 2
The cardiovascular effects of coffee consumption: An overview
Surma, S., & Lip, G. Y. H. (2024) · Coffee in Health and Disease Prevention · doi:10.1016/b978-0-443-13868-3.00014-4 · Cited by 2
Pharmacokinetics of primary atractyligenin metabolites after coffee consumption
Lang, R., Haas, M., Danzer, B., Somoza, V., & Skurk, T. (2025) · The Journal of Nutritional Biochemistry · doi:10.1016/j.jnutbio.2025.109869 · Cited by 2
Ma, T., Yang, L., Wu, M., Wang, B., Li, J., Yang, J., & Sun, X. (2025) · Diabetology & Metabolic Syndrome · doi:10.1186/s13098-025-01807-4 · Cited by 3
“In the general population, some studies have found that the type and amount of coffee and tea consumed is significantly associated with the risk of cardiovascular disease [4–6].”
Schlaganfall – Lifestyle und Umwelt
Gerischer, L. M., Flöel, A., & Endres, M. (2015) · Der Nervenarzt · doi:10.1007/s00115-014-4250-0 · Cited by 2
Coffee: friend or foe for diabetes risk?
Hitman, G. A. (2014) · Diabetic Medicine · doi:10.1111/dme.12505 · Cited by 2
Documento de consenso SEA/SEMERGEN 2019. Recomendaciones dietéticas en la prevención cardiovascular
Pascual, V., Pérez‐Martínez, P., Fernández, J. M., Solà, R., Pallarés‐Carratalá, V., Secin, A. A. R., Jiménez, F. P., & Ros, E. (2019) · Clínica e Investigación en Arteriosclerosis · doi:10.1016/j.arteri.2019.02.004 · Cited by 3
Song, J., Li, H., & Fang, X. (2023) · Frontiers in Nutrition · doi:10.3389/fnut.2023.1286430 · Cited by 3
Coffee Consumption and Its Impact on Health
Guercio, V. (2022) · Nutrition and health · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-82515-7_27 · Cited by 2
Lifestyle Modification: Diet, Exercise, Sports, and Other Issues
Owens, D. S. (2018) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-92423-6_12 · Cited by 2
EL-Masry, E. M., & Abou-Donia, M. B. (2015) · doi:10.1002/9781118683484.ch27 · Cited by 2
Kouli, G.-M., Panagiotakos, D. B., Georgousopoulou, E. N., Mellor, D. D., Chrysohoou, C. A., Zana, A., Tsigos, C., Tousoulis, D. M., Stefanadis, C., & Pitsavos, C. E. (2017) · European Journal of Nutrition · doi:10.1007/s00394-017-1487-y · Cited by 2
García, S., Monserrat-Mesquida, M., Argelich, E., Ugarriza, L., Salas‐Salvadó, J., Bautista-Castaño, I., Vioqué, J., Zomeño, M. D., Corella, D., Pintó, X., et al. (2024) · doi:10.32920/26520559 · Cited by 2
PhD, L. S. S., & MD, S. N. K. (2022) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9781394323128.ch15 · Cited by 2
Coffee and the Brain: A Comprehensive Review of Its Neurological and Psychiatric Effects
Pareek, V., Shah, S., Sharma, B., Kumar, S., & Sharma, L. K. (2024) · Journal of The Indian Academy of Geriatrics · doi:10.4103/jiag.jiag_53_23 · Cited by 1
Comprehensive Evidence-Based Health Maintenance
Schattner, A. (2024) · The American Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.amjmed.2024.03.038 · Cited by 1
Lahr, P., Carling, C., Nauer, J., McGrath, R., & Grier, J. W. (2024) · Hearts · doi:10.3390/hearts5030020 · Cited by 1
“Dietary intake such as spicy food, sodium, red meat, and high caffeine consumption are associated with an increased cardiovascular disease risk profile [14–17].”
Ekawati, W., Heriansyah, T., Kamarlis, R. K., Purnawarman, A., Sofyan, H., & Enitan, S. S. (2024) · Narra J · doi:10.52225/narra.v4i2.794 · Cited by 1
“Its pathogenesis involves several important inflammatory components [1-3], including various interrelated cell types such as macrophages, endothelial cells, vascular smooth muscle cells, and S ho r t C o mm un i ca ti on immune cells [4].”
BackgroundMachado, F., Coimbra, M. A., & Coreta-Gomes, F. M. (2024) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-443-13868-3.00077-6 · Cited by 1
Investigation on some quality parameters of probiotic UF-Iranian white cheese containing caffeine
Jooyandeh, H., & Behbahani, B. A. (2025) · Journal of Agriculture and Food Research · doi:10.1016/j.jafr.2025.101805 · Cited by 1
Doche, É., Leclercq, B., Sulowski, C., Magoncia, E., Tardivel, C., Svilar, L., Sarlon-Bartoli, G., Martin, J., Bartoli, M. A., Rossillon, A., et al. (2025) · International Journal of Molecular Sciences · doi:10.3390/ijms26147018 · Cited by 1
“Therefore, in line with recent observational studies [26,28,29], based on molecular data in humans, we support the beneficial role of coffee in promoting carotid plaque stability.”
Lewek, J., Bielecka-Dabrowa, A. M., & Banach, M. (2025) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-93459-9_19 · Cited by 1
Immune modulation in response to coffee intake: a pilot study
Bleffgen, M., Lang, R., Rogal, K., Somoza, V., & Skurk, T. (2026) · European Journal of Nutrition · doi:10.1007/s00394-026-03913-z · Cited by 2
Varpaei, H. A., Reeves, M. J., Robbins, L. B., Mowbray, F., Deka, P., & Quan, S. F. (2026) · SLEEP Advances · doi:10.1093/sleepadvances/zpag031 · Cited by 1
“Similarly, large observational meta-analyses of long-term coffee consumption reported that moderate i ntake (roughly 3–5 cups/day) is inversely associated with CVD risk (relative risks ∼ 0.85) compared to no consumption [39].”
InfluentialShaban, E. E., Elmelliti, H., Shaban, A., Shaban, A., Elkandow, A., Abdelrahim, M. G., & Zaki, H. A. (2026) · BMC Cardiovascular Disorders · doi:10.1186/s12872-026-05693-0 · Cited by 1
Lee, S., Cho, W., Cho, N.-H., & Shin, C. (2015) · 대한지역사회영양학회지 · doi:10.5720/kjcn.2015.20.4.301 · Cited by 1
“이외에도 커피섭취는 심혈관질환[46] 및 당뇨 병위험도를 낮추며[10-12], 알츠하이머 질환 위험을 낮추 는[13, 14] 등의 효과가 있는 것으로 보고 되었다.”
Quantitative Measurement of Caffeine by Optical Methods
Xu, W., & Chang, Y. (2016) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-800634-4.00081-0 · Cited by 1
Role of Phytochemicals in Eliciting Longevity Genes
Kalaiselvi, P., & Velusamy, P. (2018) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-981-13-1699-9_17 · Cited by 1
Nutrition Versus Statins in Primary Prevention: Where do we Stand Now?
Zabetakis, I., Lordan, R., & Τσούπρας, Α. (2019) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-813792-5.00009-4 · Cited by 1
New Therapeutic Approaches and Biomarkers for Increased Healthspan
Guest, P. C. (2021) · Advances in experimental medicine and biology · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-55035-6_1 · Cited by 1
Schokolade, Alkohol und Kaffee
Walter, T., Grüttner, J., Borggrefe, M., & Swoboda, S. (2015) · Der Kardiologe · doi:10.1007/s12181-015-0660-x · Cited by 1
Effect of caffeine and coffee diets on calcium signalling in rat hippocampal neurons
Shkryl, V. M., Turytska, T., Yavorsky, V. A., Lyashenko, V. P., Lukashov, S. М., & Lukyanetz, E. A. (2021) · Fìzìologìčnij žurnal · doi:10.15407/fz67.04.037 · Cited by 1
Krause, R., & Löllgen, H. (2017) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-662-54475-4_20 · Cited by 1
Una revisión de las terapias no farmacológicas y farmacológicas para tratar la hipertensión arterial
López, A. A. P., Pérez, F. P., & Chávez‐Mendoza, A. (2022) · Cardiovascular and Metabolic Science · doi:10.35366/105188 · Cited by 1
Pascual, V., Díaz-Díaz, J. L., Núñez-Cortés, J. M., & Pérez‐Martínez, P. (2022) · Clínica e Investigación en Arteriosclerosis · doi:10.1016/j.arteri.2022.09.002 · Cited by 3
Roles of Coffee and Its Components in Liver Diseases
Pak, E. S., Park, S., Yoon, H., Kim, S., & Kwon, Y. (2023) · Drug Targets and Therapeutics · doi:10.58502/dtt.23.0012 · Cited by 1
García, S., Monserrat-Mesquida, M., Argelich, E., Ugarriza, L., Salas‐Salvadó, J., Bautista-Castaño, I., Vioqué, J., Zomeño, M. D., Corella, D., Pintó, X., et al. (2024) · Nutrients · doi:10.3390/nu16050730 · Cited by 1
García, M. R., Vitelli‐Storelli, F., Toledo, E., Álvarez‐Álvarez, L., Martínez‐González, M. Á., Corella, D., Salas‐Salvadó, J., Zomeño, M. D., Martínez, J. A., Alonso‐Gómez, Á. M., et al. (2025) · Nutrition · doi:10.1016/j.nut.2025.112919 · Cited by 2
Caffeine Effects on Arterial Stiffness: To Drink or Not to Drink?
Karatzi, K., Papaioannou, T. G., Ψαλτοπούλου, Θ., et al. (2018) · Mayo Clinic Proceedings · doi:10.1016/j.mayocp.2018.06.008 · Cited by 1
Os significados da “Sinfonia do café”: uma releitura da canção de Humberto Teixeira
de Vasconcelos, F. D. A. G. (2019) · História Ciências Saúde-Manguinhos · doi:10.1590/s0104-59702019000100009 · Cited by 1
Author's reply: Caffeinated beverages and cardiovascular disease
Voskoboinik, A., & Kistler, P. M. (2019) · Trends in Cardiovascular Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.tcm.2019.07.007 · Cited by 1
Coffee Roasters and Their Occupational Lung Disease: A Literature Review
Rim, K.-T. (2019) · Toxicology and Environmental Health Sciences · doi:10.1007/s13530-019-0403-7 · Cited by 1
Cui, R., Iso, H., Eshak, E. S., Maruyama, K., Ishihara, J., Takachi, R., Sawada, N., Tsugane, S., & for the JPHC Study Group (2021) · British Journal Of Nutrition · doi:10.1017/s0007114521002737 · Cited by 1
“In addition, the major sources of nonalcoholic beverages in the present study were the green tea and coffee, which were associated with reduced risks of diabetes(31,32) and CVD(24,33).”
BackgroundCommon Risk Factors and Prevention
Brainin, M., Teuschl, Y., & Matz, K. (2019) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108659574.008 · Cited by 1
Editorial commentary: Plant-based diets: More than meets the eye
Ros, E. (2018) · Trends in Cardiovascular Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.tcm.2018.04.008 · Cited by 1
Life-course approaches to investigate adverse effects of caffeine
Ley, S. H. (2019) · American Journal of Clinical Nutrition · doi:10.1093/ajcn/nqz051 · Cited by 1
Mendelian randomization analysis with pleiotropy-robust log-linear model for binary outcomesPreprint
Li, M., Huang, T., & Jia, J. (2023) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/2023.06.03.543587 · Cited by 1
Thorpe, H. H. A., Fontanillas, P., Pham, B. K., Meredith, J. J., Jennings, M. V., Courchesne‐Krak, N. S., Vilar‐Ribó, L., Bianchi, S. B., Mutz, J., Elson, S. L., et al. (2023) · medRxiv · doi:10.1101/2023.09.09.23295284 · Cited by 1
A Multi-state Non-Markov Framework to Estimate Progression of Chronic DiseasePreprint
Ding, M., Chen, H., & Lin, F. (2024) · medRxiv · doi:10.1101/2024.02.15.24302901 · Cited by 1
Self-citationGarcía, S., Monserrat-Mesquida, M., Argelich, E., Ugarriza, L., Salas‐Salvadó, J., Bautista-Castaño, I., Vioqué, J., Zomeño, M. D., Corella, D., Pintó, X., et al. (2024) · doi:10.32920/26520559.v1 · Cited by 1
Nonlinear Polyphase Image Rate Conversion
Franzen, O., & Schröder, H. (2002) · doi:10.5281/zenodo.38010
Kaffee erhöht das Schlaganfallrisiko nicht
Diener, H.-C. (2014) · MMW - Fortschritte der Medizin · doi:10.1007/s15006-014-3017-7
Habitual Chocolate Consumption and 24‐Hour Blood Pressure Control in Older Adults with Hypertension
ARBELAEZ, E. O., Guallar‐Castillón, P., Graciani, A., Banegas, J. R., Rodríguez‐Artalejo, F., & López‐García, E. (2015) · Journal of the American Geriatrics Society · doi:10.1111/jgs.13855
von Wolff, M., & Stute, P. (2018) · Gynäkologische Endokrinologie · doi:10.1007/s10304-018-0185-z
de Cardiologia, P., & Paulo, S. (2015)
Römmler, A. (2016) · Journal für Kardiologie (Krause & Pachernegg GmbH)
Epidemiology of Gait and Daily Functioning : The role of the nervous system
Verlinden, V. J. A. (2015) · EUR Research Repository (Erasmus University Rotterdam)
Obesity and the Risk for Type 2 Diabetes
Bray, G. A. (2017) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-802928-2.00030-8
Interaktionen von Leber und Herz
Kälsch, J., Kälsch, H., & Gerken, G. (2017) · Die Gastroenterologie · doi:10.1007/s11377-017-0193-x
“So konnte in einer großen amerikanischen Metaanalyse gezeigt werden, dass 3–5 Tassen Kaffee pro Tag das Risiko einer kardiovaskulärenErkrankung erniedrigen [32].”
BackgroundCaffeine in Beverages: Cardiovascular Effects
Mattioli, A. V., Puviani, M. B., & Farinetti, A. (2019) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-815864-7.00008-8
Integrative Approach in Cardiovascular Disease
Dhindsa, D. S., Shen, J., Sandesara, P. B., & Sperling, L. S. (2020) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-30892-6_17
Kaffee erhöht nicht das Schlaganfallrisiko
Vogel, U. &. (2014) · InFo Neurologie + Psychiatrie · doi:10.1007/s15005-014-0812-8
Rouwet, E. V., & Hofstra, L. (2020) · Bohn Stafleu van Loghum eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-90-368-2324-1_5
Ortolá, R., Carballo‐Casla, A., García‐Esquinas, E., López‐García, E., Banegas, J. R., & Rodríguez‐Artalejo, F. (2020) · Journal of Nutrition · doi:10.1093/jn/nxaa126
“Although decaffeinated coffee has also shown beneficial associations with all-cause and cardiovascular mortality, type 2 diabetes, and some cancers, the magnitude of these associations seems to be generally lower than that observed for regular coffee (2, 15, 30–33); besides, its beneficial effect on CVD and Parkinson’…”
BackgroundFarah, F., Hazari, M. A. H., Arifuddin, M. S., & Tahreem, S. A. (2020) · Annals of Medical Physiology · doi:10.23921/amp.2020v4i1.94611
“Even among researchers and health care providers there is no consensus regarding effect on the cardiovascular system (CVS); studies carried out to assess the long term effects of tea and coffee consumption reported equivocal results [1,2,3,4,5,6].”
ResultPrevention of Stroke by Modification of Additional Vascular and Lifestyle Risk Factors
Towfighi, A., & Saver, J. L. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781316286234.018 · Cited by 1
The effect of coffee drinking on frequency of selected chronic diseases
Pelechová, N., Rimárová, K., & Diabelková, J. (2020) · Hygiena · doi:10.21101/hygiena.a1765
Genetic and lifestyle risks of cardiovascular disease
Said, M. A. (2021) · University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology) · doi:10.33612/diss.157192207
Herzig, Z. (2021) · doi:10.32388/wgn181
“[18][17] Case-control studies allow for recall/reporting bias and show a significant relationship between cardiovascular disease and coffee,[32] contrary to prospective studies.[33] If case controls are deemed reliable, then they also show a linear relationship between CPD and cardiovascular disease.”
ResultSchlaganfallprävention durch Lifestyle-Modifikation
Nave, A. H., & Endres, M. (2021) · DMW - Deutsche Medizinische Wochenschrift · doi:10.1055/a-1221-6985
“[27] Ding M, Bhupathiraju SN, Satija A et al.”
Background¿Podemos saborear un buen café sin remordimientos?
Carou, M. C. V., Moratalla, M., & Comas-Basté, O. (2021) · doi:10.64628/aao.wevesrcvv
JPEN Journal Club 66. Mendelian randomization
Koretz, R. L. (2021) · Journal of Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition · doi:10.1002/jpen.2299
Shirai, Y., Imai, T., Sezaki, A., MIYAMOTO, K., Kawase, F., Abe, C., Sanada, M., Inden, A., Kato, T., Sugihara, N., et al. (2021) · Research Square · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-993390/v1
Rouwet, E. V., & Hofstra, L. (2022) · Bohn Stafleu van Loghum eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-90-368-2761-4_5
Metadata
- Authors
- Ding, M., Bhupathiraju, S. N., Satija, A., van Dam, R. M., & Hu, F. B.
- Affiliations
- Brigham and Women's Hospital (US)
- From the Departments of Nutrition (M.D., S.N.B., A.S., R.M.v.D., F.B.H.) and Epidemiology (F.B.H.), Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, MA; Saw Swee Hock School of Public Health and Department of Medicine, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore and National University Health System, Singapore (R.M.v.D.); and Channing Division of Network Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA (F.B.H.).
- Venue
- Circulation
- Published
- 2014-02-11
- Volume
- 129
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 643-659
- ISSN
- 0009-7322 (ISSN-L)
- 1524-4539
- PMC
- PMC3945962
- OpenAlex
- W2137201442
- Cited by
- 565
- References
- 74
- Citations by year
- 2026: 29 · 2025: 49 · 2024: 64 · 2023: 45 · 2022: 56 · 2021: 43 · 2020: 54 · 2019: 34 · 2018: 51 · 2017: 51 · 2016: 41 · 2015: 30 · 2014: 17
- FWCI
- 21.82
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- Circulation (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- National University of Singapore (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (HL60712, R01HL060712)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology (medical) › Coffee research and impacts
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Nutritional Studies and Diet
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Alcohol Consumption and Health Effects
- Keywords
- coffee consumption, cardiovascular risk, coronary artery disease, stroke, heart failure, cardiovascular mortality, dose-response relationship, nonlinear relationship
- MeSH terms
- Cardiovascular Diseases, Coffee, Coronary Disease, Heart Failure, Humans, Prospective Studies, Risk Factors, Nonlinear Dynamics, Stroke
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-10-10, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).
A second model labelled each claim on 2026-10-10 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review