The DOI matches its Crossref record, with a small difference in title or year; 74 of the 74 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; none of the 41 sources its claims cite is checked for support yet.
Long-Term Coffee Consumption and Risk of Cardiovascular Disease: A Systematic Review and a Dose–Response Meta-Analysis of Prospective Cohort Studies
Open accessAbstract
Background—: Considerable controversy exists on the association between coffee consumption and cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk. A meta-analysis was performed to assess the dose–response relationship of long-term coffee consumption with CVD risk. Methods and Results—: PubMed and EMBASE were searched for prospective cohort studies of the relationship between coffee consumption and CVD risk, which included coronary heart disease, stroke, heart failure, and CVD mortality. Thirty-six studies were included with 1 279 804 participants and 36 352 CVD cases. A nonlinear relationship of coffee consumption with CVD risk was identified ( P for heterogeneity=0.09, P for trend <0.001, P for nonlinearity <0.001). Compared with the lowest category of coffee consumption (median, 0 cups per day), the relative risk of CVD was 0.95 (95% confidence interval, 0.87–1.03) for the highest category (median, 5 cups per day) category, 0.85 (95% confidence interval, 0.80–0.90) for the second highest category (median, 3.5 cups per day), and 0.89 (95% confidence interval, 0.84–0.94) for the third highest category (median, 1.5 cups per day). Looking at separate outcomes, coffee consumption was nonlinearly associated with both coronary heart disease ( P for heterogeneity=0.001, P for trend <0.001, P for nonlinearity <0.001) and stroke ( P for heterogeneity=0.07, P for trend <0.001, P for nonlinearity <0.001; P for trend differences >0.05) risks. Conclusions—: A nonlinear association between coffee consumption and CVD risk was observed in this meta-analysis. Moderate coffee consumption was inversely significantly associated with CVD risk, with the lowest CVD risk at 3 to 5 cups per day, and heavy coffee consumption was not associated with elevated CVD risk.
Overview
AI snapshot
Written from the paper’s full text.
TL;DR
This systematic review and dose–response meta-analysis found a non-linear, U-shaped association between long-term coffee consumption and cardiovascular disease risk, with the lowest risk at 3 to 5 cups/day. Moderate coffee consumption was inversely associated with CVD, CHD, and stroke, while heavy consumption was not associated with elevated CVD risk.
Key findings
- Compared with the lowest coffee consumption category (median 0 cups/day), pooled relative risks for CVD were 0.89 (95% CI, 0.84–0.94) for the third highest category (median 1.5 cups/day), 0.85 (95% CI, 0.80–0.90) for the second highest category (median 3.5 cups/day), and 0.95 (95% CI, 0.87–1.03) for the highest category (median 5 cups/day).
- In the dose–response spline model, RRs versus no coffee consumption were 0.95 (0.93–0.97) at 1 cup/day, 0.92 (0.88–0.95) at 2 cups/day, 0.89 (0.85–0.93) at 3 cups/day, 0.88 (0.83–0.93) at 4 cups/day, 0.89 (0.83–0.95) at 5 cups/day, 0.91 (0.84–0.99) at 6 cups/day, and 0.93 (0.85–1.03) at 7 cups/day.
- Non-linear associations with significant trends were found for both CHD and stroke; heterogeneity was stronger for CHD (P for heterogeneity = 0.001) than for stroke (P for heterogeneity = 0.07).
- Stratified analyses found no significant interactions between categorized coffee consumption and baseline hypertension/MI, smoking status, publication year, NOS quality score, dietary assessment method, outcome, country, sex, or coffee type (all P for interactions > 0.05). Egger tests did not suggest publication bias.
Methods
- Systematic review and dose–response meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies, following the MOOSE protocol; PubMed and EMBASE were searched from January 1966 to March 2013.
- The abstract reports 36 included studies with 1,279,804 participants and 36,352 CVD cases; the Results and Discussion report approximately 1,283,685 participants and 47,779 CVD cases, including 28,347 CHD, 12,030 stroke, and 7,402 other CVD cases. The main analysis included 35 studies, and 29 studies were included in the dose–response analysis.
- Analyses used semi-parametric and parametric methods, random- or fixed-effects models, generalized least squares, and restricted cubic splines with 3 knots; stratified analyses and Egger’s regression symmetry test were also performed.
Limitations
- The paper states that, given the observational nature of included studies, residual confounding cannot be excluded and a causal relationship cannot be established; residual confounding by smoking may have biased heavy coffee consumption upward.
- The paper states that coffee brewing methods were not assessed, so results may not apply to unfiltered coffee (e.g., French press, Scandinavian boiled, or Turkish/Greek coffee).
- The paper states that none of the included cohorts assessed CYP1A2 genotype, so genotype-stratified analysis was not possible. Evident from the text: participant and CVD case counts differ between the abstract and the Results/Discussion sections.
Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
0 of 41 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“the imputed correlation coefficient between the risks of stroke and CHD within the same cohort (0 < ρ ≤ 1) did not have an effect on the relative risk of CVD for each category of coffee consumption.”
§ Long-Term Coffee Consumption and Risk of Cardiovascular Disease: A Systematic Review and a Dose-Response Meta-Analysis of Prospective Cohort Studies > Results > Coffee consumption and risk of CVD
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesA result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“0.90 (95% CI, 0.84 to 0.97; P for heterogeneity = 0.02; I2 = 40.3%) for the second highest category”
§ Long-Term Coffee Consumption and Risk of Cardiovascular Disease: A Systematic Review and a Dose-Response Meta-Analysis of Prospective Cohort Studies > Results > Stratified analyses
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesA result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“0.85 (95% CI, 0.80 to 0.90) for the second highest (median: 3.5 cups/d; mean: 3 cups/d)”
- Also stated in: § Methods and Results · plain
“0.85 (0.80 to 0.90) for the second highest (median: 3.5 cups/d)”
§ Long-Term Coffee Consumption and Risk of Cardiovascular Disease: A Systematic Review and a Dose-Response Meta-Analysis of Prospective Cohort Studies > Results > Coffee consumption and risk of CVD
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passes- Also stated in: § Methods and Results · plain
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“the RR of CVD was 0.96 (95% CI, 0.65 to 1.42) for age < 65 years”
§ Long-Term Coffee Consumption and Risk of Cardiovascular Disease: A Systematic Review and a Dose-Response Meta-Analysis of Prospective Cohort Studies > Results > Stratified analyses
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [27] Klatsky AL Friedman GD Armstrong MA Coffee use prior to myocardial infarction restudied: Heavier intake may increase the risk Am J Epidemiol 1990 132 479 488 2389752 source
- Not checked yetcites [28] Lindsted KD Kuzma JW Anderson JL Coffee consumption and cause-specific mortality. Association with age at death and compression of mortality J Clin Epidemiol 1992 45 733 742 1619453 source
- Not checked yetcites [29] Bidel S Hu G Qiao Q Jousilahti P Antikainen R Tuomilehto J Coffee consumption and risk of total and cardiovascular mortality among patients with type 2 diabetes Diabetologia 2006 49 2618 2626 17019600 source
- Not checked yetcites [30] Greenberg JA Dunbar CC Schnoll R Kokolis R Kokolis S Kassotis J Caffeinated beverage intake and the risk of heart disease mortality in the elderly: A prospective analysis AmJ Clin Nutr 2007 85 392 398 17284734 source
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesA result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“No interactions between categorized coffee consumption and stratification variables in relation to CVD risk were observed (all P for interactions >0.05)”
§ Long-Term Coffee Consumption and Risk of Cardiovascular Disease: A Systematic Review and a Dose-Response Meta-Analysis of Prospective Cohort Studies > Results > Stratified analyses
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesA result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“0.80 (95% CI, 0.75 to 0.86; P for heterogeneity = 0.37; I2 = 6.5%) for the second category”
§ Long-Term Coffee Consumption and Risk of Cardiovascular Disease: A Systematic Review and a Dose-Response Meta-Analysis of Prospective Cohort Studies > Results > Stratified analyses
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesA result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“the RRs of CHD were 0.89 (95% CI, 0.85 to 0.94; P for heterogeneity = 0.83; I2 = 0.0%) for the third highest category”
§ Long-Term Coffee Consumption and Risk of Cardiovascular Disease: A Systematic Review and a Dose-Response Meta-Analysis of Prospective Cohort Studies > Results > Stratified analyses
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesA result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“0.95 (95% CI, 0.87 to 1.03) for the highest (median: 5 cups/d; mean: 5.5 cups/d) category of coffee consumption”
- Also stated in: § Methods and Results · plain
“0.95 (95% CI, 0.87 to 1.03) for the highest (median: 5 cups/d) category”
§ Long-Term Coffee Consumption and Risk of Cardiovascular Disease: A Systematic Review and a Dose-Response Meta-Analysis of Prospective Cohort Studies > Results > Coffee consumption and risk of CVD
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passes- Also stated in: § Methods and Results · plain
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“0.92 (95% CI, 0.88 to 0.95) for 2 cups/d”
§ Long-Term Coffee Consumption and Risk of Cardiovascular Disease: A Systematic Review and a Dose-Response Meta-Analysis of Prospective Cohort Studies > Results > Dose-response analysis of coffee consumption with risk of CVD
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesA result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“0.89 (95% CI, 0.85 to 0.93) for 3 cups/d”
§ Long-Term Coffee Consumption and Risk of Cardiovascular Disease: A Systematic Review and a Dose-Response Meta-Analysis of Prospective Cohort Studies > Results > Dose-response analysis of coffee consumption with risk of CVD
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passes
- It may state two separate claims as one. 32
- Probably not a substantial claim. 20
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“we observed a non-linear association between coffee consumption and risk of CVD (P for non-linearity < 0.001) with a significant trend (P for trend <0.001) and limited heterogeneity in study results (P for heterogeneity = 0.09)”
- Also stated in: § Methods and Results · plain
“A non-linear relationship of coffee consumption with CVD risk was identified (P for heterogeneity = 0.09, P for trend < 0.001, P for non-linearity < 0.001).”
- Also stated in: § Conclusions · plain
“A non-linear association between coffee consumption with CVD risk was observed in this meta-analysis.”
§ Long-Term Coffee Consumption and Risk of Cardiovascular Disease: A Systematic Review and a Dose-Response Meta-Analysis of Prospective Cohort Studies > Results > Dose-response analysis of coffee consumption with risk of CVD
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
- Also stated in: § Methods and Results · plain
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Thirty-six studies remained in the meta-analysis (Figure 1).”
§ Long-Term Coffee Consumption and Risk of Cardiovascular Disease: A Systematic Review and a Dose-Response Meta-Analysis of Prospective Cohort Studies > Results > Characteristics of studies
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The included studies comprised approximately 1,283,685 study participants and 47,779 CVD cases, including 28,347 CHD cases, 12,030 stroke cases and 7,402 other CVD cases.”
§ Long-Term Coffee Consumption and Risk of Cardiovascular Disease: A Systematic Review and a Dose-Response Meta-Analysis of Prospective Cohort Studies > Results > Characteristics of studies
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedn = 47,779Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Our results remained largely unchanged and non-linear curves were found with including either CHD or stroke as the outcome”
§ Long-Term Coffee Consumption and Risk of Cardiovascular Disease: A Systematic Review and a Dose-Response Meta-Analysis of Prospective Cohort Studies > Results > Sensitivity analysis
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Since the vast majority of our participants were Caucasians, the allele frequency was expected to be consistent across various cohorts.”
§ Long-Term Coffee Consumption and Risk of Cardiovascular Disease: A Systematic Review and a Dose-Response Meta-Analysis of Prospective Cohort Studies > DISCUSSION
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“After adjustment for smoking and other covariates, heavy coffee was consumption was not significantly associated with CVD and the inverse association between moderate consumption and CVD became stronger.”
§ Long-Term Coffee Consumption and Risk of Cardiovascular Disease: A Systematic Review and a Dose-Response Meta-Analysis of Prospective Cohort Studies > DISCUSSION
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“One author (M. D.) assessed study eligibility and extracted the data, the other author (A. S.) independently double-checked the available data.”
§ Long-Term Coffee Consumption and Risk of Cardiovascular Disease: A Systematic Review and a Dose-Response Meta-Analysis of Prospective Cohort Studies > INTRODUCTION > Data extraction and quality assessment
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“We assessed the potential for publication bias using Egger's regression symmetry test.25”
§ Long-Term Coffee Consumption and Risk of Cardiovascular Disease: A Systematic Review and a Dose-Response Meta-Analysis of Prospective Cohort Studies > INTRODUCTION > Data Synthesis and Analysis
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [25] Egger M Davey Smith G Schneider M Minder C Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test BMJ 1997 315 629 634 9310563 PMC2127453 source
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Sensitivity analysis was conducted by imputing different ρ (0 < ρ ≤ 1) to evaluate the robustness of the effect estimates.”
§ Long-Term Coffee Consumption and Risk of Cardiovascular Disease: A Systematic Review and a Dose-Response Meta-Analysis of Prospective Cohort Studies > INTRODUCTION > Data Synthesis and Analysis
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“The Newcastle-Ottawa quality assessment scale (NOS) 22was used to evaluate the quality of the included studies.”
§ Long-Term Coffee Consumption and Risk of Cardiovascular Disease: A Systematic Review and a Dose-Response Meta-Analysis of Prospective Cohort Studies > INTRODUCTION > Data extraction and quality assessment
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites [22] Wells GA SB O'Connell D Peterson J Welch V Losos M Tugwell P The newcastle-ottawa scale (nos) for assessing the quality of nonrandomized studies in meta-analysis 2011 www.ohri.ca/programs/clinical_epidemiology/oxford.asp
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Not matched
In the paper
“one recent meta-analysis paper showed that heavy coffee consumption was not associated with risk of CVD mortality.20”
§ Long-Term Coffee Consumption and Risk of Cardiovascular Disease: A Systematic Review and a Dose-Response Meta-Analysis of Prospective Cohort Studies > INTRODUCTION
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [20] Malerba S Turati F Galeone C Pelucchi C Verga F La Vecchia C Tavani A A meta-analysis of prospective studies of coffee consumption and mortality for all causes, cancers and cardiovascular diseases Eur J Epidemiol 2013 28 527 39 doi: 10.1007/s10654-013-9834-7. Epub 2013 Aug 11 23934579 source
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim.
In the paper
“We followed the Meta-Analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology21 protocol throughout the design, implementation, analysis, and reporting of our meta-analysis.”
§ Long-Term Coffee Consumption and Risk of Cardiovascular Disease: A Systematic Review and a Dose-Response Meta-Analysis of Prospective Cohort Studies > INTRODUCTION > Methods
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [21] Stroup DF Berlin JA Morton SC Olkin I Williamson GD Rennie D Moher D Becker BJ Sipe TA Thacker SB Meta-analysis of observational studies in epidemiology: A proposal for reporting. Meta-analysis of observational studies in epidemiology (moose) group JAMA 2000 283 2008 2012 10789670 source
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“We searched the PubMed and EMBASE databases for prospective studies that had evaluated the association between coffee consumption and risk of CVD between January 1966 and March 2013.”
§ Long-Term Coffee Consumption and Risk of Cardiovascular Disease: A Systematic Review and a Dose-Response Meta-Analysis of Prospective Cohort Studies > INTRODUCTION > Search strategy and selection criteria
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The scores of the NOS quality assessment ranged from 3 to 8, and 31 studies had scores of 5 or higher.”
§ Long-Term Coffee Consumption and Risk of Cardiovascular Disease: A Systematic Review and a Dose-Response Meta-Analysis of Prospective Cohort Studies > Results > Characteristics of studies
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Possible reasons for this discrepancy include a relatively small size, lack of updated dietary assessment, and subgroup analysis.”
§ Long-Term Coffee Consumption and Risk of Cardiovascular Disease: A Systematic Review and a Dose-Response Meta-Analysis of Prospective Cohort Studies > DISCUSSION
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [32] Liu J Sui X Lavie CJ Hebert JR Earnest CP Zhang J Blair SN Association of coffee consumption with all-cause and cardiovascular disease mortality Mayo Clin Proc 2013 88 1066 74 doi: 10.1016/j.mayocp.2013.06.020. Epub 2013 Aug 15 23953850 PMC3835155 source
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:conditional· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Recently, a genome-wide association study (GWAS) found a highly significant association between a variant on CYP1A2 and coffee intake48.”
§ Long-Term Coffee Consumption and Risk of Cardiovascular Disease: A Systematic Review and a Dose-Response Meta-Analysis of Prospective Cohort Studies > DISCUSSION
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [48] Cornelis MC Monda KL Yu K Paynter N Azzato EM Bennett SN Berndt SI Boerwinkle E Chanock S Chatterjee N Couper D Curhan G Heiss G Hu FB Hunter DJ Jacobs K Jensen MK Kraft P Landi MT Nettleton JA Purdue MP Rajaraman P Rimm EB Rose LM Rothman N Silverman D Stolzenberg-Solomon R Subar A Yeager M Chasman DI van Dam RM Caporaso NE Genome-wide meta-analysis identifies regions on 7p21 (ahr) and 15q24 (cyp1a2) as determinants of habitual caffeine consumption PLoS Genet 2011 7 e1002033 21490707 PMC3071630 source
Strength:boosted· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“First, the consumption of decaffeinated coffee was much lower than caffeinated coffee, diminishing the power to detect any association.”
§ Long-Term Coffee Consumption and Risk of Cardiovascular Disease: A Systematic Review and a Dose-Response Meta-Analysis of Prospective Cohort Studies > DISCUSSION
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“It has been shown that drinking boiled coffee increases serum cholesterol, an important risk factor for CVD5.”
§ Long-Term Coffee Consumption and Risk of Cardiovascular Disease: A Systematic Review and a Dose-Response Meta-Analysis of Prospective Cohort Studies > DISCUSSION
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [5] Bak AA Grobbee DE The effect on serum cholesterol levels of coffee brewed by filtering or boiling N Engl J Med 1989 321 1432 1437 2811958 source
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“However, this analysis was based on a case-control study conducted in Costa Rico and the results have not been replicated in prospective cohort studies yet.”
§ Long-Term Coffee Consumption and Risk of Cardiovascular Disease: A Systematic Review and a Dose-Response Meta-Analysis of Prospective Cohort Studies > DISCUSSION
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [47] Cornelis MC El-Sohemy A Kabagambe EK Campos H Coffee, cyp1a2 genotype, and risk of myocardial infarction JAMA 2006 295 1135 1141 16522833 source
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“A study by Cornelis MC et al.47 showed that CYP1A2 genotype was an effect modifier between coffee consumption and risk of myocardial infarction: coffee consumption was related to higher risk of myocardial infarction for the slow caffeine metabolizer, and was not related to myocardial infarction for the fast caffeine metabolizer.”
§ Long-Term Coffee Consumption and Risk of Cardiovascular Disease: A Systematic Review and a Dose-Response Meta-Analysis of Prospective Cohort Studies > DISCUSSION
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [47] Cornelis MC El-Sohemy A Kabagambe EK Campos H Coffee, cyp1a2 genotype, and risk of myocardial infarction JAMA 2006 295 1135 1141 16522833 source
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Results from case crossover studies suggest that coffee consumption transiently increases risk of nonfatal myocardial infarction, ischemic stroke onset, and sudden cardiac death.44–46”
§ Long-Term Coffee Consumption and Risk of Cardiovascular Disease: A Systematic Review and a Dose-Response Meta-Analysis of Prospective Cohort Studies > DISCUSSION
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [44] Baylin A Hernandez-Diaz S Kabagambe EK Siles X Campos H Transient exposure to coffee as a trigger of a first nonfatal myocardial infarction Epidemiology 2006 17 506 511 16837823 source
- Not checked yetcites [45] Selb Semerl J Selb K Coffee and alcohol consumption as triggering factors for sudden cardiac death: Case-crossover study Croat Med J 2004 45 775 780 15578815
- Not checked yetcites [46] Mostofsky E Schlaug G Mukamal KJ Rosamond WD Mittleman MA Coffee and acute ischemic stroke onset: The stroke onset study Neurology 2010 75 1583 1588 20881275 PMC3120108 source
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“a previous meta-analysis summarizing 21 prospective cohort studies31 found no association between moderate coffee consumption and CHD risk in the overall population.”
§ Long-Term Coffee Consumption and Risk of Cardiovascular Disease: A Systematic Review and a Dose-Response Meta-Analysis of Prospective Cohort Studies > DISCUSSION
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [31] Wu JN Ho SC Zhou C Ling WH Chen WQ Wang CL Chen YM Coffee consumption and risk of coronary heart diseases: A meta-analysis of 21 prospective cohort studies Int JCardiol 2009 137 216 225 18707777 source
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Second, smoking is likely to be an important confounder for the association between coffee consumption and CVD risk, and could bias the relative risks upwards.”
§ Long-Term Coffee Consumption and Risk of Cardiovascular Disease: A Systematic Review and a Dose-Response Meta-Analysis of Prospective Cohort Studies > DISCUSSION
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Long-term heavy coffee consumption has been associated with a slightly elevated risk of hypertension,40 and a higher level of plasma homocysteine.41, 42”
§ Long-Term Coffee Consumption and Risk of Cardiovascular Disease: A Systematic Review and a Dose-Response Meta-Analysis of Prospective Cohort Studies > DISCUSSION
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [40] Zhang Z Hu G Caballero B Appel L Chen L Habitual coffee consumption and risk of hypertension: A systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective observational studies Am JClin Nutr 2011 93 1212 1219 21450934 source
- Not checked yetcites [41] Verhoef P Pasman WJ Van Vliet T Urgert R Katan MB Contribution of caffeine to the homocysteine-raising effect of coffee: A randomized controlled trial in humans Am J Clin Nutr 2002 76 1244 1248 12450889 source
- Not checked yetcites [42] Olthof MR Hollman PC Zock PL Katan MB Consumption of high doses of chlorogenic acid, present in coffee, or of black tea increases plasma total homocysteine concentrations in humans Am J Clin Nutr 2001 73 532 538 11237928 source
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“However, short-term metabolic studies have shown that caffeine can acutely increase blood pressure by antagonizing the adenosine A1 and A2A receptor,35–37 and could also acutely adversely affect arterial stiffness and endothelium dependent vasodilation.38, 39”
§ Long-Term Coffee Consumption and Risk of Cardiovascular Disease: A Systematic Review and a Dose-Response Meta-Analysis of Prospective Cohort Studies > DISCUSSION
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [35] Nurminen ML Niittynen L Korpela R Vapaatalo H Coffee, caffeine and blood pressure: A critical review Eur J Clin Nutr 1999 53 831 839 10556993 source
- Not checked yetcites [36] Mesas AE Leon-Munoz LM Rodriguez-Artalejo F Lopez-Garcia E The effect of coffee on blood pressure and cardiovascular disease in hypertensive individuals: A systematic review and meta-analysis Am J Clin Nutr 2011 94 1113 1126 21880846 source
- Not checked yetcites [37] Fredholm BB Battig K Holmen J Nehlig A Zvartau EE Actions of caffeine in the brain with special reference to factors that contribute to its widespread use Pharmacol Rev 1999 51 83 133 10049999 source
- Not checked yetcites [38] Karatzis E Papaioannou TG Aznaouridis K Karatzi K Stamatelopoulos K Zampelas A Papamichael C Lekakis J Mavrikakis M. Acute effects of caffeine on blood pressure and wave reflections in healthy subjects: Should we consider monitoring central blood pressure? Int JCardiol 2005 98 425 430 15708175 source
- Not checked yetcites [39] Papamichael CM Aznaouridis KA Karatzis EN Karatzi KN Stamatelopoulos KS Vamvakou G Lekakis JP Mavrikakis ME Effect of coffee on endothelial function in healthy subjects: The role of caffeine Clin Sci (Lond) 2005 109 55 60 15799717 source
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“However, none of the included cohorts assessed the genotypes and thus we were unable to conduct such a stratified analysis.”
§ Long-Term Coffee Consumption and Risk of Cardiovascular Disease: A Systematic Review and a Dose-Response Meta-Analysis of Prospective Cohort Studies > DISCUSSION
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“First, coffee brewing methods have changed over time and nowadays the filter method has become more popular, effectively replacing unfiltered forms of coffee such as boiled coffee that was more widely consumed by participants in earlier studies.”
§ Long-Term Coffee Consumption and Risk of Cardiovascular Disease: A Systematic Review and a Dose-Response Meta-Analysis of Prospective Cohort Studies > DISCUSSION
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Since the true association between coffee consumption and CVD risk is likely to be modest and nonlinear, the differences in coffee assessments and covariate adjustments may result in changes the magnitude and even the direction of the associations and thus lead to different conclusions.”
§ Long-Term Coffee Consumption and Risk of Cardiovascular Disease: A Systematic Review and a Dose-Response Meta-Analysis of Prospective Cohort Studies > DISCUSSION
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“One possible reason is that the previous meta-analysis included 7 studies without adjustment for confounders, which might have biased the relative risks upwards because of confounding by factors such as smoking.”
§ Long-Term Coffee Consumption and Risk of Cardiovascular Disease: A Systematic Review and a Dose-Response Meta-Analysis of Prospective Cohort Studies > DISCUSSION
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [31] Wu JN Ho SC Zhou C Ling WH Chen WQ Wang CL Chen YM Coffee consumption and risk of coronary heart diseases: A meta-analysis of 21 prospective cohort studies Int JCardiol 2009 137 216 225 18707777 source
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:conditional· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“First, individuals with hypertension or other conditions related to CVD risk might have changed their coffee consumption before baseline. Thus, baseline disease, especially hypertension, as a confounder could result in reverse causation.”
§ Long-Term Coffee Consumption and Risk of Cardiovascular Disease: A Systematic Review and a Dose-Response Meta-Analysis of Prospective Cohort Studies > DISCUSSION
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The non-linear U-shaped between coffee consumption and CVD risk might also be true based on plausible biological mechanisms.”
§ Long-Term Coffee Consumption and Risk of Cardiovascular Disease: A Systematic Review and a Dose-Response Meta-Analysis of Prospective Cohort Studies > DISCUSSION
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Coffee consumption has been associated with higher insulin sensitivity, a lower risk of type 2 diabetes, and lower concentrations of inflammatory markers such as C-reactive protein and E-selectin.33, 34”
§ Long-Term Coffee Consumption and Risk of Cardiovascular Disease: A Systematic Review and a Dose-Response Meta-Analysis of Prospective Cohort Studies > DISCUSSION
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [33] van Dam RM Hu FB Coffee consumption and risk of type 2 diabetes: A systematic review JAMA 2005 294 97 104 15998896 source
- Not checked yetcites [34] Williams CJ Fargnoli JL Hwang JJ van Dam RM Blackburn GL Hu FB Mantzoros CS Coffee consumption is associated with higher plasma adiponectin concentrations in women with or without type 2 diabetes: A prospective cohort study Diabetes Care 2008 31 504 507 18070989 PMC2737446 source
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“A recent cohort study by Liu et al32 found that 4 cups per day of coffee consumption was associated with increased mortality, but the association was only significant for participants under 55 years old.”
§ Long-Term Coffee Consumption and Risk of Cardiovascular Disease: A Systematic Review and a Dose-Response Meta-Analysis of Prospective Cohort Studies > DISCUSSION
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [32] Liu J Sui X Lavie CJ Hebert JR Earnest CP Zhang J Blair SN Association of coffee consumption with all-cause and cardiovascular disease mortality Mayo Clin Proc 2013 88 1066 74 doi: 10.1016/j.mayocp.2013.06.020. Epub 2013 Aug 15 23953850 PMC3835155 source
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Case-control studies, which are prone to recall bias and selection bias, tended to show a positive association, whereas cohort studies generally showed a null association.10”
§ Long-Term Coffee Consumption and Risk of Cardiovascular Disease: A Systematic Review and a Dose-Response Meta-Analysis of Prospective Cohort Studies > DISCUSSION
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [10] Greenland S A meta-analysis of coffee, myocardial infarction, and coronary death Epidemiology 1993 4 366 374 8347748 source
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Second, in earlier studies, the sample size was typically small; the measurement of baseline characteristics was typically crude; statistical control of confounders such as diet was inadequate; and the average NOS study quality score was lower.”
§ Long-Term Coffee Consumption and Risk of Cardiovascular Disease: A Systematic Review and a Dose-Response Meta-Analysis of Prospective Cohort Studies > DISCUSSION
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The non-linear U-shaped between coffee consumption and risk of CVD might be due to a combination of beneficial and detrimental effects: for moderate coffee consumption, beneficial effects may be greater than adverse effects; whereas for heavy consumption, detrimental effect may counterbalance beneficial effects.”
§ Long-Term Coffee Consumption and Risk of Cardiovascular Disease: A Systematic Review and a Dose-Response Meta-Analysis of Prospective Cohort Studies > DISCUSSION
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“However, since higher coffee consumption was generally associated with a less healthy lifestyle such as a higher prevalence of cigarette smoking, less physical activity, and a less healthy diet, the observed association between moderate coffee consumption and a lower CVD risk is unlikely to be explained by these confounders.”
§ Long-Term Coffee Consumption and Risk of Cardiovascular Disease: A Systematic Review and a Dose-Response Meta-Analysis of Prospective Cohort Studies > DISCUSSION
Load-bearingStrength:hedged· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In addition, residual confounding by smoking may have biased the association for heavy coffee consumption upward, which may explain our finding that adjustment for smoking and other covariates actually strengthened the inverse association.”
§ Long-Term Coffee Consumption and Risk of Cardiovascular Disease: A Systematic Review and a Dose-Response Meta-Analysis of Prospective Cohort Studies > DISCUSSION
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:conditional· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Third, we used both semi-parametric and parametric methods, and both analyses indicated a U-shaped relationship between coffee consumption and CVD risk.”
§ Long-Term Coffee Consumption and Risk of Cardiovascular Disease: A Systematic Review and a Dose-Response Meta-Analysis of Prospective Cohort Studies > DISCUSSION
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“However, given coffee consumption habits in the studied populations most consumed coffee is likely to have been filtered coffee.”
§ Long-Term Coffee Consumption and Risk of Cardiovascular Disease: A Systematic Review and a Dose-Response Meta-Analysis of Prospective Cohort Studies > DISCUSSION
Load-bearingStrength:hedged· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Finally, we conducted stratified analyses according to disease endpoints, geographic locations of the studies, type of coffee, and baseline characteristics of the study populations. The subgroup results are highly consistent and robust.”
§ Long-Term Coffee Consumption and Risk of Cardiovascular Disease: A Systematic Review and a Dose-Response Meta-Analysis of Prospective Cohort Studies > DISCUSSION
Load-bearingStrength:boosted· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“First, our meta-analysis included 35 cohort studies and 1,283,685 participants, which provided sufficient power to detect modest associations.”
§ Long-Term Coffee Consumption and Risk of Cardiovascular Disease: A Systematic Review and a Dose-Response Meta-Analysis of Prospective Cohort Studies > DISCUSSION
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Second, because of the prospective design of all included studies, differential misclassification of coffee consumption due to recall bias was minimized and the likelihood of selection bias is reduced.”
§ Long-Term Coffee Consumption and Risk of Cardiovascular Disease: A Systematic Review and a Dose-Response Meta-Analysis of Prospective Cohort Studies > DISCUSSION
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
The paper relies on this without support.
Coffee is one of the most widely consumed beverages around the world.
“Coffee is one of the most widely consumed beverages around the world; thus, investigating whether or not coffee consumption is associated with chronic disease risk has important public health implications.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The shape of the association between coffee consumption and cardiovascular disease risk remains uncertain.
“These meta-analyses did not support an association between coffee consumption and a higher CVD risk, but the shape of the association remains uncertain.”
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Compared with the lowest category of coffee consumption (median zero cups per day), the RRs of CHD were 0.89 (95 % CI = 0.85-0.94)for the first category (median 1.5 cups per day), 0.90 (95 % CI = 0.84-0.97)for the second category (median 3.5 cups per day) and 0.93 (95 % CI = 0.84-1.02)for the third category of coffee consumption (median five cups per day).”
From Scientific Opinion on the safety of caffeine (2015) · cites this paper as Ding et al., 2014
In the citing paper
“Coffee consumption was inversely associated with the risk of CVD up to eight cups per day.No association was observed between coffee consumption and CHD risk at higher intake.”
From Scientific Opinion on the safety of caffeine (2015) · cites this paper as Ding et al., 2014
In the citing paper
“In the dose-response analysis, coffee consumption was inversely associated with the risk of CVD up to six cups per day.”
From Scientific Opinion on the safety of caffeine (2015) · cites this paper as Ding et al. (2014)
In the citing paper
“No association was observed between coffee consumption of higher intakes and the risk of stroke.”
From Scientific Opinion on the safety of caffeine (2015) · cites this paper as Ding et al. (2014)
In the citing paper
“Coffee consumption up to about four cups per day was inversely associated with the risk of stroke.”
From Scientific Opinion on the safety of caffeine (2015) · cites this paper as Ding et al. (2014)
In the citing paper
“No association was observed between coffee consumption and CVD risk at higher intake.”
From Scientific Opinion on the safety of caffeine (2015) · cites this paper as Ding et al. (2014)
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.
Participant totals differ between abstract and results
MajorThe abstract reports 1,279,804 participants in 36 studies, whereas the Results reports approximately 1,283,685 participants in the same number of studies.
“Thirty-six studies were included with 1,279,804 participants and 36,352 CVD cases.”
“The included studies comprised approximately 1,283,685 study participants and 47,779 CVD cases”
Citations
Cites
Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test
Egger, M., Smith, G. D., Schneider, M., & Minder, C. (1997) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.315.7109.629 · Cited by 56,722 · cited 1×
“We assessed the potential for publication bias using the Egger regression symmetry test.(25) All analyses were conducted with STATA version 11.”
Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology<SUBTITLE>A Proposal for Reporting</SUBTITLE>
Stroup, D. F. (2000) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.283.15.2008 · Cited by 20,623
(2014) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 17,633
Fredholm, B. B., Bättig, K., Holmén, J., Nehlig, A., & Zvartau, E. E. (1999) · Pharmacological Reviews · doi:10.1016/s0031-6997(24)01396-6 · Cited by 2,624
Methods for Trend Estimation from Summarized Dose-Response Data, with Applications to Meta-Analysis
Greenland, S., & Longnecker, M. P. (1992) · American Journal of Epidemiology · doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a116237 · Cited by 2,353 · cited 1×
“For the parametric method, a dose–response meta-analysis was performed.(24) The number of cases and participants in each coffee consumption category was extracted to estimate the covariance of the RR in each study.”
Robust variance estimation in meta‐regression with dependent effect size estimates
Hedges, L. V., Tipton, E., & Johnson, M. C. (2010) · Research Synthesis Methods · doi:10.1002/jrsm.5 · Cited by 2,086
Effects of Caffeine on Plasma Renin Activity, Catecholamines and Blood Pressure
Robertson, D., Frölich, J. C., Carr, R. K., Watson, J. T., Hollifield, J. W., Shand, D. G., & Oates, J. A. (1978) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm197801262980403 · Cited by 757 · cited 1×
“Short-term metabolic studies found that caffeine ingestion acutely induces cardiac arrhythmias and increases plasma renin activity, catecholamine concentrations, and blood pressure.(2,3) In the 1980s, cross-sectional studies found a positive association between coffee consumption and serum total cholesterol concentrat…”
Coffee Consumption and Risk of Type 2 Diabetes: A Systematic Review
van Dam, R. M., & Hu, F. B. (2005) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.294.1.97 · Cited by 662
Self-citationA Longitudinal Study of Coronary Heart Disease
Paul, O., Lepper, M. H., Phelan, W. H., DUPERTUIS, G. W., Macmillan, A., McKean, H. E., & Park, H.-B. (1963) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/01.cir.28.1.20 · Cited by 610 · cited 1×
“The relationship between coffee consumption and risk of coronary heart disease was first studied in the 1960s, given that the prevalences of both coffee drinking and coronary heart disease (CHD) were high in Western countries.(1) Short-term metabolic studies found that caffeine ingestion acutely induces cardiac arrhyt…”
Association of Coffee Drinking with Total and Cause-Specific Mortality
Freedman, N. D., Park, Y., Abnet, C. C., Hollenbeck, A. R., & Sinha, R. R. (2012) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa1112010 · Cited by 597
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
2018 ESC/ESH Guidelines for the management of arterial hypertension
Williams, B., Mancia, G., Spiering, W., Agabiti Rosei, E., Azizi, M., Burnier, M., Clement, D. L., Coca, A., de Simone, G., Dominiczak, A., et al. (2018) · European Heart Journal · doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehy339 · Cited by 10,286
Williams, B., Mancia, G., Spiering, W., Agabiti Rosei, E., Azizi, M., Burnier, M., Clement, D. L., Coca, A., de Simone, G., Dominiczak, A., et al. (2018) · Journal of Hypertension · doi:10.1097/hjh.0000000000001940 · Cited by 2,885
Mozaffarian, D. (2016) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/circulationaha.115.018585 · Cited by 2,216
Coffee consumption and health: umbrella review of meta-analyses of multiple health outcomes
Poole, R., Kennedy, O. J., Roderick, P., Fallowfield, J. A., Hayes, P. C., & Parkes, J. (2017) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.j5024 · Cited by 835
Mendelian randomization for cardiovascular diseases: Principles and applications
Larsson, S. C., Butterworth, A. S., & Burgess, S. (2023) · European Heart Journal · doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehad736 · Cited by 735
“82 It should be noted that MR analyses have assumed a linear relationship be-tween coffee consumption and CVD, and results might therefore have been attenuated to the null if the relationship is non-linear as suggested by observational studies (lowest CVD risk at three to five cups per day).”
InfluentialScientific Opinion on the safety of caffeine
EFSA Panel on Dietetic Products, N. A. A. (. (2015) · EFSA Journal · doi:10.2903/j.efsa.2015.4102 · Cited by 613
Coffee, Caffeine, and Health Outcomes: An Umbrella Review
Grosso, G., Godos, J., Galvano, F., & Giovannucci, E. L. (2017) · Annual Review of Nutrition · doi:10.1146/annurev-nutr-071816-064941 · Cited by 531
van Dam, R. M., Hu, F. B., & Willett, W. C. (2020) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmra1816604 · Cited by 508
Self-citationThe 2015 Dutch food-based dietary guidelines
Kromhout, D., Spaaij, C. J. K., de Goede, J., & Weggemans, R. M. (2016) · European Journal of Clinical Nutrition · doi:10.1038/ejcn.2016.52 · Cited by 416
Cardiovascular Disease Prevention by Diet Modification
Yu, E., Malik, V., & Hu, F. B. (2018) · Journal of the American College of Cardiology · doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2018.02.085 · Cited by 378
“Regular consumption of coffee has been consistently associated with lower risk of CVD, with the greatest risk reduction occurring at around 3–5 cups per day conferring an 11% lower risk (43).”
BackgroundSelf-citationNutrition and Cardiovascular Health
Casas, R. M., Castro‐Barquero, S., Estruch, R., & Sacanella, E. (2018) · International Journal of Molecular Sciences · doi:10.3390/ijms19123988 · Cited by 370
“A meta-analysis [223], including 14 prospective cohort studies with 1,279,804 participants and 36,352 CVD cases, showed that moderate consumption of coffee (three to five cups/day) was associated with a lower CVD risk compared with non-consumers.”
Dose–Response Relationship Between Physical Activity and Risk of Heart Failure: A Meta-Analysis
Pandey, A., Garg, S., Khunger, M., Darden, D., Ayers, C., Kumbhani, D. J., Mayo, H. G., de Lemos, J. A., & Berry, J. D. (2015) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/circulationaha.115.015853 · Cited by 272
Pandey, A., Salahuddin, U., Garg, S., Ayers, C., Kulinski, J., Anand, V., Mayo, H., Kumbhani, D. J., de Lemos, J., & Berry, J. D. (2016) · JAMA Cardiology · doi:10.1001/jamacardio.2016.1567 · Cited by 272
Long‐Term Cardiovascular Risk After Radiotherapy in Women With Breast Cancer
Cheng, Y., Nie, X., Ji, C., Lin, X., Liu, L., Chen, X., Yao, H., & Wu, S. (2017) · Journal of the American Heart Association · doi:10.1161/jaha.117.005633 · Cited by 270
Neuroprotective Effects of Coffee Bioactive Compounds: A Review
Socała, K., Szopa, A., Serefko, A., Poleszak, E., & Właź, P. (2020) · International Journal of Molecular Sciences · doi:10.3390/ijms22010107 · Cited by 271
Carlström, M., & Larsson, S. C. (2018) · Nutrition Reviews · doi:10.1093/nutrit/nuy014 · Cited by 248
“However, the overall evidence from epidemiological studies indicates nonlinear relationships between coffee consumption and risk of total cardiovascular disease, coronary heart disease, and stroke.(64) In a meta-analysis of 36 prospective cohort studies with almost 1.”
BackgroundCaffeine Consumption through Coffee: Content in the Beverage, Metabolism, Health Benefits and Risks
DePaula, J., & Farah, A. (2019) · Beverages · doi:10.3390/beverages5020037 · Cited by 258
Cafestol and Kahweol: A Review on Their Bioactivities and Pharmacological Properties
Ren, Y., Wang, C., Xu, J., & Wang, S. (2019) · International Journal of Molecular Sciences · doi:10.3390/ijms20174238 · Cited by 232
“Statistics show that moderate consumption of coffee (3 to 5 cups/day) reduces the risk of cardiovascular disease [2].”
BackgroundEffects of coffee/caffeine on brain health and disease: What should I tell my patients?
Nehlig, A. (2015) · Practical Neurology · doi:10.1136/practneurol-2015-001162 · Cited by 206
Ding, M., Satija, A., Bhupathiraju, S. N., Hu, Y., Sun, Q., Han, J., López‐García, E., Willett, W. C., van Dam, R. M., & Hu, F. B. (2015) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/circulationaha.115.017341 · Cited by 204
“Coffee consumption has been inversely associated with risks of type 2 diabetes mellitus,(1) liver cancer,(2) endometrial cancer,(3) lethal prostate cancer,(4) basal cell carcinoma of the skin,(5) and neurologic diseases,(6) as well as with risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD) when consumed in moderation.(7)”
BackgroundSelf-citationThe Impact of Coffee on Health
Nieber, K. (2017) · Planta Medica · doi:10.1055/s-0043-115007 · Cited by 203
“Interestingly, a meta-analysis published in 2014 [28] concluded that moderate coffee consumption (3–5 cups/day) was associated with a lower CVD risk, and heavy coffee consumption (≥ 6 cups/day) was neither associated with a higher nor a lower risk of CVD.”
BackgroundZhang, Y., Yang, H., Li, S., Li, W., & Wang, Y. (2021) · PLoS Medicine · doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1003830 · Cited by 196
“In the spline models, we adjusted for sex, age, ethnicity, education, income, body mass index (BMI), physical activity, alcohol status, smoking status, diet pattern, consumption of sugar-sweetened beverages, HDL, LDL, history of cancer, history of diabetes, history of CAD, and hypertension; PLOS Medicine | https://doi…”
BackgroundInfluentialCrippa, A., Discacciati, A., Larsson, S. C., Wolk, A., & Orsini, N. (2014) · American Journal of Epidemiology · doi:10.1093/aje/kwu194 · Cited by 191
Nordestgaard, A. T., Thomsen, M., & Nordestgaard, B. G. (2015) · International Journal of Epidemiology · doi:10.1093/ije/dyv083 · Cited by 189
Coffee consumption and disease correlations
Gökcen, B. B., & Şanlıer, N. (2017) · Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition · doi:10.1080/10408398.2017.1369391 · Cited by 197
“As a result of a meta-analysis by Ding et al. (2013), 3–5 cups/day (moderate) consumption was related to lower risk of cardiovascular disease and 6 cups/day B. B.”
BackgroundMonteiro, J., Alves, M. G., Oliveira, P. F., & Silva, B. M. (2016) · Molecules · doi:10.3390/molecules21080974 · Cited by 195
“Moreover, epidemiologic studies have provided evidence of the cardioprotective actions of methylxanthine-containing beverages, in reducing the risk of coronary heart disease and stroke [263–265].”
BackgroundAssociation of Coffee Drinking With Mortality by Genetic Variation in Caffeine Metabolism
Loftfield, E., Cornelis, M. C., Caporaso, N. E., Yu, K. F., Sinha, R. R., & Freedman, N. D. (2018) · JAMA Internal Medicine · doi:10.1001/jamainternmed.2018.2425 · Cited by 178
Natural Products to Counteract the Epidemic of Cardiovascular and Metabolic Disorders
Waltenberger, B., Mocan, A., Šmejkal, K., Heiß, E. H., & Atanasov, A. G. (2016) · Molecules · doi:10.3390/molecules21060807 · Cited by 180
Consumers’ Perceptions of Coffee Health Benefits and Motives for Coffee Consumption and Purchasing
Samoggia, A., & Riedel, B. (2019) · Nutrients · doi:10.3390/nu11030653 · Cited by 179
Grosso, G., Micek, A., Godos, J., Sciacca, S., Pająk, A., Martínez‐González, M. Á., Giovannucci, E. L., & Galvano, F. (2016) · European Journal of Epidemiology · doi:10.1007/s10654-016-0202-2 · Cited by 175
Man, A. W. C., Li, H., & Xia, N. (2020) · Oxidative Medicine and Cellular Longevity · doi:10.1155/2020/1496462 · Cited by 182
Coffee and tea on cardiovascular disease (CVD) prevention
Chieng, D., & Kistler, P. M. (2021) · Trends in Cardiovascular Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.tcm.2021.08.004 · Cited by 172
Loftfield, E., Freedman, N. D., Dodd, K. W., Vogtmann, E., Xiao, Q., Sinha, R. R., & Graubard, B. I. (2016) · Journal of Nutrition · doi:10.3945/jn.116.233940 · Cited by 161
Kim, Y., Je, Y., & Giovannucci, E. L. (2019) · European Journal of Epidemiology · doi:10.1007/s10654-019-00524-3 · Cited by 163
Atheroprotective effects of (poly)phenols: a focus on cell cholesterol metabolism
Zanotti, I., Dall’Asta, M., Mena, P. R., Mele, L., Bruni, R., Ray, S., & Rio, D. D. (2014) · Food & Function · doi:10.1039/c4fo00670d · Cited by 160
Barrea, L., Pugliese, G., Frías-Toral, E., Ghoch, M. E., Castellucci, B., Chapela, S. P., Carignano, M. D. L. A., Laudisio, D., Savastano, S., Colao, A., et al. (2021) · Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition · doi:10.1080/10408398.2021.1963207 · Cited by 170
Acidity and Antioxidant Activity of Cold Brew Coffee
Rao, N. Z., & Fuller, M. (2018) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-018-34392-w · Cited by 144
Relationship of Daily Step Counts to All-Cause Mortality and Cardiovascular Events
Stens, N. A., Bakker, E. A., Mañas, A., Buffart, L. M., Ortega, F. B., Lee, D.-C., Thompson, P. D., Thijssen, D. H. J., & Eijsvogels, T. M. H. (2023) · Journal of the American College of Cardiology · doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2023.07.029 · Cited by 148
Loftfield, E., Freedman, N. D., Graubard, B. I., Guertin, K. A., Black, A., Huang, W., Shebl, F. M., Mayne, S. T., & Sinha, R. R. (2015) · American Journal of Epidemiology · doi:10.1093/aje/kwv146 · Cited by 124
“The association between coffee and risk of coronary heart disease continues to be debated (4) because of inconsistent results derived by varying study designs (33, 34), as well as small experimental studies showing that acute intake of coffee and caffeine can increase blood pressure (35) and adversely affect endotheli…”
BackgroundZhou, A., & Hyppönen, E. (2018) · American Journal of Clinical Nutrition · doi:10.1093/ajcn/nqy297 · Cited by 125
“2014 (6), adjustments vary between studies.”
BackgroundResultInfluentialThe Medicinal Chemistry of Caffeine
Faudone, G., Arifi, S., & Merk, D. (2021) · Journal of Medicinal Chemistry · doi:10.1021/acs.jmedchem.1c00261 · Cited by 133
Vinke, P. C., Corpeleijn, E., Dekker, L. H., Jacobs, D. R., Navis, G. J., & Kromhout, D. (2018) · European Journal of Clinical Nutrition · doi:10.1038/s41430-018-0205-z · Cited by 118
“2 diabetes.(36,37) Combined with the methodological constraint that most dietary assessment 265”
BackgroundLiu, D., Li, Z., Shen, D., Zhang, P., Song, W.-Q., Zhang, W., Huang, Q., Chen, P., Zhang, X., & Mao, C. (2022) · Annals of Internal Medicine · doi:10.7326/m21-2977 · Cited by 120
“The current findings were consistent with findings from previous meta-analyses of observational studies (2, 3, 22) that moderate coffee consumption was associated with a U-shaped low risk for all-cause mortality.”
ResultUnderstanding the Links Between Cardiovascular Disease and Parkinson's Disease
Potashkin, J., Huang, X., Becker, C., Chen, H., Foltynie, T., & Marras, C. (2019) · Movement Disorders · doi:10.1002/mds.27836 · Cited by 121
(2022) · PubMed Central · doi:10.6515/acs.202205_38(3).20220321a · Cited by 117
Natural Bioactive Compounds Useful in Clinical Management of Metabolic Syndrome
Noce, A., Lauro, M. D., Daniele, F. D., Zaitseva, A. P., Marrone, G., Borboni, P., & Daniele, N. D. (2021) · Nutrients · doi:10.3390/nu13020630 · Cited by 120
“Furthermore, caffeine has been associated with a dose-dependent reduction in glucose absorption [114,161,162].”
BackgroundLebeau, P. F., Byun, J. H., Platko, K., Saliba, P., Sguazzin, M. A., MacDonald, M. E., Paré, G., Steinberg, G. R., Janssen, L. J., Igdoura, S. A., et al. (2022) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-022-28240-9 · Cited by 113
Coffee for Cardioprotection and Longevity
O’Keefe, J. H., DiNicolantonio, J. J., & Lavie, C. J. (2018) · Progress in Cardiovascular Diseases · doi:10.1016/j.pcad.2018.02.002 · Cited by 106
The Potential of Spent Coffee Grounds in Functional Food Development
Bevilacqua, E., Cruzat, V. F., Singh, I., Rose’Meyer, R. B., Panchal, S. K., & Brown, L. (2023) · Nutrients · doi:10.3390/nu15040994 · Cited by 121
“In addition, a meta-analysis showed those who consume three to five cups of caffeinated coffee a day have lower incidence of coronary artery disease, stroke and death due to cardiovascular causes [130].”
BackgroundSurma, S., Sahebkar, A., & Banach, M. (2022) · Pharmacological Research · doi:10.1016/j.phrs.2022.106596 · Cited by 99
Grosso, G., Micek, A., Godos, J., Pająk, A., Sciacca, S., Bes‐Rastrollo, M., Galvano, F., & Martínez‐González, M. Á. (2017) · Nutrients · doi:10.3390/nu9080890 · Cited by 102
“cardiovascular disease (CVD), including coronary heart disease and stroke [5], and mortality [6] suggesting that moderate consumption is key for its beneficial effects.”
BackgroundRodríguez‐Artalejo, F., & López‐García, E. (2017) · Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry · doi:10.1021/acs.jafc.7b04506 · Cited by 99
Shin, S., Lee, J. E., Loftfield, E., Shu, X., Abe, S. K., Rahman, M. S., Saito, E., Islam, M. R., Tsugane, S., Sawada, N., et al. (2021) · International Journal of Epidemiology · doi:10.1093/ije/dyab161 · Cited by 98
Pharmacological potential of methylxanthines: Retrospective analysis and future expectations
Monteiro, J., Alves, M. G., Oliveira, P. F., & Silva, B. M. (2018) · Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition · doi:10.1080/10408398.2018.1461607 · Cited by 104
“It seems that caffeine may not be the only responsible for the effects produced by coffee, since both caffeinated and decaffeinated coffee were associated with reduced diabetes risk (Ding et al. 2014a; Pereira, Parker, and Folsom 2006; van Dam et al. 2006).”
BackgroundInfluentialHow coffee affects metabolic syndrome and its components
Başpınar, B., Eskici, G., & Özçelik, A. Ö. (2017) · Food & Function · doi:10.1039/c7fo00388a · Cited by 90
A Clinician’s Guide for Trending Cardiovascular Nutrition Controversies
Freeman, A. M., Morris, P. B., Aspry, K. E., Gordon, N. F., Barnard, N. D., Esselstyn, C. B., Ros, E., Devries, S. R., O’Keefe, J. H., Miller, M. J., et al. (2018) · Journal of the American College of Cardiology · doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2018.05.030 · Cited by 93
“Overall, large analyses indicate that coffee intake is correlated with a doseresponse protective benefit: habitual consumption of coffee is associated with lower risks of all-cause mortality and CVD mortality (69,70), but not with an increased risk of arrhythmias, hypertension, or hyperlipidemia.”
BackgroundAkomolafe, S. F., Akinyemi, A. J., Ogunsuyi, O. B., Oyeleye, S. I., Oboh, G., Adeoyo, O. O., & Allismith, Y. R. (2017) · NeuroToxicology · doi:10.1016/j.neuro.2017.04.008 · Cited by 89
Chieng, D., Cánovas, R., Segan, L. A., Sugumar, H., Voskoboinik, A., Prabhu, S., Ling, L., Lee, G., Morton, J. B., Kaye, D. M., et al. (2022) · European Journal of Preventive Cardiology · doi:10.1093/eurjpc/zwac189 · Cited by 89
Lifestyle and clinical determinants of skin autofluorescence in a population‐based cohort study
van Waateringe, R. P., Slagter, S. N., van der Klauw, M. M., van Vliet‐Ostaptchouk, J. V., Graaff, R., Paterson, A. D., Lutgers, H. L., & Wolffenbuttel, B. H. R. (2016) · European Journal of Clinical Investigation · doi:10.1111/eci.12627 · Cited by 90
Bartella, L., Donna, L. D., Napoli, A., Siciliano, C., Sindona, G., & Mazzotti, F. (2018) · Food Chemistry · doi:10.1016/j.foodchem.2018.11.072 · Cited by 88
Zimmermann-Viehoff, F., Thayer, J., Koenig, J., Herrmann, C., Weber, C. S., & Deter, H.-C. (2016) · Nutritional Neuroscience · doi:10.1179/1476830515y.0000000018 · Cited by 87
Leptin and Nutrition in Gestational Diabetes
Pérez‐Pérez, A., Vilariño‐García, T., Guadix, P., Dueñas, J. L., & Sánchez‐Margalet, V. (2020) · Nutrients · doi:10.3390/nu12071970 · Cited by 95
Associations of Coffee Drinking with Systemic Immune and Inflammatory Markers
Loftfield, E., Shiels, M. S., Graubard, B. I., Katki, H. A., Chaturvedi, A. K., Trabert, B. L., Pinto, L. A., Kemp, T. J., Shebl, F. M., Mayne, S. T., et al. (2015) · Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention · doi:10.1158/1055-9965.epi-15-0038-t · Cited by 84
“In contrast, themore recent epidemiologic evidence suggests inverse associations with cardiovascular disease (41), total and cardiovascular disease mortality (2–4) as well as type II diabetes (10), Parkinson's disease (42), chronic liver disease (11), and certain cancers (5, 6, 8).”
BackgroundResultCoffee consumption and risk of fractures: A systematic review and dose–response meta-analysis
Lee, D. R., Lee, J., Rota, M., Lee, J., Ahn, H. S., Park, S. M., & Shin, D. (2014) · Bone · doi:10.1016/j.bone.2014.02.007 · Cited by 83
“M aa tt a [2 3] 20 12 1 1 0 1 2 1 1 0 7”
Nordestgaard, A. T., & Nordestgaard, B. G. (2016) · International Journal of Epidemiology · doi:10.1093/ije/dyw325 · Cited by 84
Nia, N. A., Foroughi, M. M., & Jahani, S. (2020) · Talanta · doi:10.1016/j.talanta.2020.121563 · Cited by 78
Association Between Coffee Intake After Diagnosis of Colorectal Cancer and Reduced Mortality
Hu, Y., Ding, M., Yuan, C., Wu, K., Smith-Warner, S. A., Hu, F. B., Chan, A. T., Meyerhardt, J. A., Ogino, S., Fuchs, C. S., et al. (2018) · Gastroenterology · doi:10.1053/j.gastro.2017.11.010 · Cited by 75
Coffee consumption and risk of hypertension: a dose–response meta-analysis of prospective studies
D’Elia, L., Fata, E. L., Galletti, F., Scalfi, L., & Strazzullo, P. (2017) · European Journal of Nutrition · doi:10.1007/s00394-017-1591-z · Cited by 78
“These results are in keeping with the evidence of a statistical inverse association between regular coffee consumption and risk of cardiovascular disease [6, 7].”
ResultVallejo, R. M., Schulz, C., van de Locht, K., Oluwagbemigun, K., Alexy, U., & Nöthlings, U. (2022) · Journal of Nutrition · doi:10.1093/jn/nxac094 · Cited by 74
“associated with lower risk of stroke and dementia (34), and an inverse association between CVD risk and moderate coffee consumption has been reported in a meta-analysis of 36 studies (35).”
BackgroundCoffee and Endothelial Function: A Coffee Paradox?
Higashi, Y. (2019) · Nutrients · doi:10.3390/nu11092104 · Cited by 75
Coffee consumption and risk of hypertension: A prospective analysis in the cohort study
Miranda, A. M., Goulart, A. C., Benseñor, I. M., Lotufo, P. A., & Marchioni, D. M. L. (2020) · Clinical Nutrition · doi:10.1016/j.clnu.2020.05.052 · Cited by 80
Li, J.-W., Xu, C., Ye, F., Wang, Y., & Xiao, Y.-B. (2014) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0102276 · Cited by 71
“If P for linearity is less than 0.05, we first got the estimating values directly from the cubic spine estimation, and then used semi-parametric methods described by Frank [9].”
InfluentialXiao, Q., Sinha, R. R., Graubard, B. I., & Freedman, N. D. (2014) · Hepatology · doi:10.1002/hep.27367 · Cited by 70
Mills, C. E., Flury, A., Marmet, C., Poquet, L., Rimoldi, S. F., Sartori, C. S., Rexhaj, E., Brenner, R., Allemann, Y., Zimmermann, D., et al. (2016) · Clinical Nutrition · doi:10.1016/j.clnu.2016.11.013 · Cited by 69
Spence, J. D. (2018) · Stroke and Vascular Neurology · doi:10.1136/svn-2017-000130 · Cited by 74
“44 As both decaffeinated and regular coffee appear to have equal benefit with regard to reduction of cardiovascular disase and diabetes, 45 46 it seems likely that benefits of coffee are from bioflavonoids.”
BackgroundKwok, M. K., Leung, G. M., & Schooling, C. M. (2016) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/srep36500 · Cited by 70
Gaeini, Z., Bahadoran, Z., Mirmiran, P., & Azizi, F. (2019) · Nutrition & Metabolism · doi:10.1186/s12986-019-0355-6 · Cited by 76
Tverdal, A., Selmer, R. M., Cohen, J. M., & Thelle, D. S. (2020) · European Journal of Preventive Cardiology · doi:10.1177/2047487320914443 · Cited by 68
Miranda, A. M., Steluti, J., Fisberg, R. M., & Marchioni, D. M. L. (2017) · Nutrients · doi:10.3390/nu9030276 · Cited by 67
Top 10 dietary strategies for atherosclerotic cardiovascular risk reduction
Sikand, G., & Severson, T. (2020) · American Journal of Preventive Cardiology · doi:10.1016/j.ajpc.2020.100106 · Cited by 73
Hjartåker, A., Knudsen, M. D., Tretli, S., & Weiderpass, E. (2014) · European Journal of Nutrition · doi:10.1007/s00394-014-0741-9 · Cited by 66
Nutraceuticals and blood pressure control: a European Society of Hypertension position document
Borghi, C., Tsioufis, K. P., Agabiti‐Rosei, E., Burnier, M., Cicero, A. F. G., Clement, D. L., Coca, A., Desideri, G., Grassi, G. M., Lović, D. B., et al. (2020) · Journal of Hypertension · doi:10.1097/hjh.0000000000002353 · Cited by 67
“5 cups/day, and not higher for heavier drinkers [45].”
BackgroundMaso, M. D., Boffetta, P., Negri, E., Vecchia, C. L., & Bravi, F. (2020) · Advances in Nutrition · doi:10.1093/advances/nmaa177 · Cited by 64
“Comparable nonlinear associations between coffee consumption and CVD incidence/mortality in the US population were reported in previous dose–response meta-analyses (37, 38, 42) where no further risk reduction was observed for 1172 Di Maso et al.”
BackgroundResultWittenbecher, C., Cuadrat, R. R. C., Johnston, L., Eichelmann, F., Jäger, S., Kuxhaus, O., Prada, M., Fabiola Del Greco, M., Hicks, A. A., Hoffman, P., et al. (2022) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-022-28496-1 · Cited by 63
Self-citationChen, Y., Zhang, Y., Zhang, M., Yang, H., & Wang, Y. (2022) · BMC Medicine · doi:10.1186/s12916-022-02636-2 · Cited by 60
Tea consumption and attenuation of biological aging: a longitudinal analysis from two cohort studies
Xiang, Y., Xu, H., Chen, H., Tang, D., Huang, Z., Zhang, Y., Wang, Z., Wang, Z., Yangla, Han, M., et al. (2023) · The Lancet Regional Health - Western Pacific · doi:10.1016/j.lanwpc.2023.100955 · Cited by 67
“58 Possible mechanisms might involve the hormesis of bioactive substances in tea, which is characterized by low-dose stimulation and high-dose inhibition.”
BackgroundLarsson, S. C., Drca, N., Jensen‐Urstad, M., & Wolk, A. (2015) · BMC Medicine · doi:10.1186/s12916-015-0447-8 · Cited by 60
“Moderate coffee consumption has been associated with reduced risk of type 2 diabetes [2], coronary heart disease [3], stroke [3, 4], and mortality from all causes and cardiovascular disease [5].”
Hu, E. A., Selvin, E., Grams, M. E., Steffen, L. M., Coresh, J., & Rebholz, C. M. (2018) · American Journal of Kidney Diseases · doi:10.1053/j.ajkd.2018.01.030 · Cited by 61
“Coffee consumption has been shown to be protective against multiple chronic conditions such as diabetes (3, 4), coronary heart disease (5), cancer (6, 7), and all-cause mortality (8– 11).”
BackgroundIacoviello, L., Bonaccio, M., Cairella, G., Catani, M. V., Costanzo, S., D’Elia, L., Giacco, R., Rendina, D., Sabino, P., Savini, I., et al. (2018) · Nutrition Metabolism and Cardiovascular Diseases · doi:10.1016/j.numecd.2017.12.010 · Cited by 60
Shahinfar, H., Jayedi, A., Khan, T. A., & Shab‐Bidar, S. (2021) · Nutrition Metabolism and Cardiovascular Diseases · doi:10.1016/j.numecd.2021.05.014 · Cited by 58
Kajikawa, M., Maruhashi, T., Hidaka, T., Nakano, Y., Kurisu, S., Matsumoto, T., Iwamoto, Y., Kishimoto, S., Matsui, S., Aibara, Y., et al. (2018) · European Journal of Nutrition · doi:10.1007/s00394-018-1611-7 · Cited by 57
Epigenome-wide association meta-analysis of DNA methylation with coffee and tea consumption
Karabegović, I., Portilla-Fernández, E., Li, Y., Ma, J., Maas, S. C. E., Sun, D., Hu, E. A., Kühnel, B., Zhang, Y., Ambatipudi, S., et al. (2021) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-021-22752-6 · Cited by 57
Coffee consumption and cardiometabolic health: a comprehensive review of the evidence
Ungvari, Z. I., & Kunutsor, S. K. (2024) · GeroScience · doi:10.1007/s11357-024-01262-5 · Cited by 69
“In stratified analyses, the results were similar across age, sex, smoking status, geographical location, and coffee subtype (caffeinated and decaf-feinated) [89].”
BackgroundResultInfluentialGan, Y., Wu, J., Zhang, S., Li, L., Cao, S., Mkandawire, N., Ji, K., Herath, C., Gao, C., Xu, H. W., et al. (2016) · Oncotarget · doi:10.18632/oncotarget.8627 · Cited by 55
“One potential interpretation of this finding was that coffee brewing methods had changed over time, and currently, the filter method is more popular, effectively replacing unfiltered forms of coffee, such as boiled coffee, which were more widely consumed by participants in earlier studies [39].”
Association of coffee consumption and chronic kidney disease: A meta-analysis
Wijarnpreecha, K., Thongprayoon, C., Thamcharoen, N., Panjawatanan, P., & Cheungpasitporn, W. (2016) · International Journal of Clinical Practice · doi:10.1111/ijcp.12919 · Cited by 54
The emerging role of sorting nexins in cardiovascular diseases
Yang, J., Villar, V. A. M., Rozyyev, S., Jose, P. A., & Zeng, C. (2019) · Clinical Science · doi:10.1042/cs20190034 · Cited by 55
Watanabe, T., Kobayashi, S., Yamaguchi, T. F., Hibi, M., Fukuhara, I., & Osaki, N. (2019) · Nutrients · doi:10.3390/nu11071617 · Cited by 61
Contributions of Interactions Between Lifestyle and Genetics on Coronary Artery Disease Risk
Said, M. A., van de Vegte, Y. J., Zafar, M., van der Ende, M. Y., Raja, G. K., Verweij, N., & van der Harst, P. (2019) · Current Cardiology Reports · doi:10.1007/s11886-019-1177-x · Cited by 54
The impact of coffee consumption on blood pressure, cardiovascular disease and diabetes mellitus
Chrysant, S. G. (2017) · Expert Review of Cardiovascular Therapy · doi:10.1080/14779072.2017.1287563 · Cited by 54
“11) Ding [16] Rev-Meta 1,279,804 20–83 5 2–32 CVD, death 0.”
BackgroundA framework for the meta‐analysis of Bland–Altman studies based on a limits of agreement approach
Tipton, E., & Shuster, J. J. (2017) · Statistics in Medicine · doi:10.1002/sim.7352 · Cited by 59
Metadata
- Authors
- Ding, M., Bhupathiraju, S. N., Satija, A., van Dam, R. M., & Hu, F. B.
- Affiliations
- Brigham and Women's Hospital (US)
- From the Departments of Nutrition (M.D., S.N.B., A.S., R.M.v.D., F.B.H.) and Epidemiology (F.B.H.), Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, MA; Saw Swee Hock School of Public Health and Department of Medicine, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore and National University Health System, Singapore (R.M.v.D.); and Channing Division of Network Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA (F.B.H.).
- Venue
- Circulation
- Published
- 2014-02-11
- Volume
- 129
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 643-659
- ISSN
- 0009-7322 (ISSN-L)
- 1524-4539
- PMC
- PMC3945962
- OpenAlex
- W2137201442
- Cited by
- 565
- References
- 74
- Citations by year
- 2026: 29 · 2025: 49 · 2024: 64 · 2023: 45 · 2022: 56 · 2021: 43 · 2020: 54 · 2019: 34 · 2018: 51 · 2017: 51 · 2016: 41 · 2015: 30 · 2014: 17
- FWCI
- 21.82
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- Circulation (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- National University of Singapore (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (HL60712, R01HL060712)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology (medical) › Coffee research and impacts
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Nutritional Studies and Diet
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Alcohol Consumption and Health Effects
- Keywords
- coffee consumption, cardiovascular risk, coronary artery disease, stroke, heart failure, cardiovascular mortality, dose-response relationship, nonlinear relationship
- MeSH terms
- Cardiovascular Diseases, Coffee, Coronary Disease, Heart Failure, Humans, Prospective Studies, Risk Factors, Nonlinear Dynamics, Stroke
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-10-10, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).
A second model labelled each claim on 2026-10-10 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review