CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 102Diabetes Management and ResearchElectrochemical sensors and biosensorsNeuroscience and Neural Engineering

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 58 of the 60 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Biomechanics of the Sensor-Tissue Interface—Effects of Motion, Pressure, and Design on Sensor Performance and Foreign Body Response—Part II: Examples and Application

Open access
Helton, Kristen L., Ratner, Buddy D., Wisniewski, Natalie A.·2011·Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology
DOI 10.1177/193229681100500318PMC PMC3192630
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

This article is the second part of a two-part review in which we explore the biomechanics of the sensor-tissue interface as an important aspect of continuous glucose sensor biocompatibility. Part I, featured in this issue of Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology, describes a theoretical framework of how biomechanical factors such as motion and pressure (typically micromotion and micropressure) affect tissue physiology around a sensor and in turn, impact sensor performance. Here in Part II, a literature review is presented that summarizes examples of motion or pressure affecting sensor performance. Data are presented that show how both acute and chronic forces can impact continuous glucose monitor signals. Also presented are potential strategies for countering the ill effects of motion and pressure on glucose sensors. Improved engineering and optimized chemical biocompatibility have advanced sensor design and function, but we believe that mechanical biocompatibility, a rarely considered factor, must also be optimized in order to achieve an accurate, long-term, implantable sensor.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/193229681100500318

Cites

58 of 58 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 7

  1. Breton MD, 2011, Diabetes Technol Ther., 13, 176
  2. Renard EM, Farret A, Place J, Cobelli C, Kovatchev BP, Breton MD. Closed-loop insulin delivery using subcutaneous infusion and glucose sensing, and equipped with a dedicated safety supervision algorithm, improves safety of glucose control in type 1 diabetes. Proceedings of the 46th Annual Meeting of the European Association for the Study of Diabetes; 2010 Sep 20–24; Stockholm, Sweden.
  3. Von Recum A, 1990, New aspects of biocompatibility: Motion at the interface
  4. 10.1046/j.1467-2494.2000.00037.x · DOI · Paper page
  5. Wu JZ, 2006, Biomedical Mater Eng., 16, 53
  6. Marshall AJ, 2004, Polym Prepr., 45, 100
  7. 10.2337/diacare.23.2.208 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 102

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Helton, K. L., Ratner, B. D., & Wisniewski, N. A.
Affiliations
  • University of Washington (US)
  • Profusa (United States) (US)
Corresponding author
Wisniewski, Natalie A.
ORCID
Ratner, Buddy D.
Venue
Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology
Publisher
SAGE Publications
Published
2011-05
Volume
5
Issue
3
Pages
647-656
ISSN
1932-2968 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1177/193229681100500318
PMC
PMC3192630
OpenAlex
W2092619316
Cited by
102
References
60
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 4
Type
conference abstract
Language
en
Open access
Licence
journals.sagepub.com/page/policies/text-and-data-mining-license (tdm)
Locations
  • Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Analytical Chemistry › Electrochemical sensors and biosensors
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neural Engineering
Keywords
continuous glucose monitoring, micromotion, foreign body reaction, implantable glucose sensor, sensor design
MeSH terms
Animals, Biocompatible Materials, Biomechanical Phenomena, Blood Glucose, Diabetes Mellitus, Dogs, Equipment Design, Glucose, Humans, Motion, Pressure, Self Care, Swine, Blood Glucose Self-Monitoring, Reproducibility of Results, Porosity, Rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review