The DOI matches its Crossref record; 63 of the 89 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; 5 of the 48 sources its claims cite were checked for support.
Taking the Load Off a Learner's Mind: Instructional Design for Complex Learning
Open accessAbstract
Complex learning aims at the integration of knowledge, skills, and attitudes; the coordination of qualitatively different constituent skills; and the transfer of what is learned to daily life or work settings. Recent instructional theories stress authentic learning tasks as the driving force for learning; but due to the complexity of those tasks, learning may be hampered by the limited processing capacity of the human mind. In this article we present a framework for scaffolding practice and just-in-time information presentation, aiming to control cognitive load effectively. We briefly describe a design model for complex learning consistent with cognitive load theory. Theoretical and practical implications of the presented framework are discussed.
Overview
AI snapshot
Written from the paper’s full text.
TL;DR
This conceptual article argues that authentic whole-task learning can overwhelm working memory, so instruction should manage cognitive load through scaffolding and timely information. It proposes simple-to-complex task classes, alternative task formats, and just-in-time supportive and procedural information within a four-component design model.
Key findings
- Whole-task sequencing should start with the simplest authentic versions of a task and move through task classes of increasing complexity; simpler classes impose lower intrinsic load and should fall within learners’ proximal development.
- Within a task class, support should fade from worked-out examples to completion, goal-free, or reverse tasks, and finally to conventional problems; these alternatives reduce extraneous load compared with conventional problem solving.
- Supportive information for nonrecurrent aspects should be presented before a task class and elaborated, while procedural information for recurrent aspects should be presented during practice and integrated with the task environment to avoid split attention.
- The 4C/ID model consists of learning tasks, supportive information, procedural information, and part-task practice; part-task practice is reserved for recurrent aspects requiring high automaticity after they have been introduced in whole tasks.
Methods
- Conceptual/theoretical paper, not an empirical study; no sample, data collection, or statistical analysis is reported.
- Synthesizes cognitive load theory and instructional design literature to derive guidelines and a design model for complex learning.
- Uses narrative argument and illustrative examples, such as a literature-search task and a table of task types, rather than original quantitative results.
Limitations
- The authors state the overview is incomplete and note that they are unaware of empirical research relating process-oriented support to cognitive load.
- The authors state the framework focuses on reducing intrinsic and extraneous load as a means to free processing resources, and that explicit methods to increase germane load may be needed; they also note that cognitive load theory alone is insufficient for a full instructional design model.
- Evident from the text: no original empirical test, effect sizes, or new data are presented, so the claims rest on prior studies and conceptual consistency.
Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
43 Own interpretation · 16 No full text of the sources · 9 No basis given · 5 Sources not found · 5 Not checked yet · 2 Supported · 2 Partly supported · 1 Supported so far · accuracy not yet measured
The sources with a verdict support this claim; the rest weren’t checked yet, have no full text we could read, or their verdicts aren’t rated yet.
In the paper
“Indeed, many experiments supported the counterintuitive prediction that studying worked-out examples facilitates schema construction and transfer performance more than actually solving the equivalent problems does (van Gerven, Paas, van Merriënboer, & Schmidt, 2002; also see Sweller et al., 1998, for an overview).”
§ Taking the Load Off a Learner's Mind: Instructional Design for Complex Learning > Types of Learning Tasks
What the sources say
- Supportedcites van Gerven, Paas, van Merriënboer, & Schmidt, 2002 source
Section 4 states that worked examples are more likely than conventional problems to support schema construction and that numerous studies found superior performance and transfer. The Discussion says this paper's own experiment did not find a significant performance advantage, but the cited claim concerns the broader experimental literature the paper reports. (LLM, conf=0.90)
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Sweller et al., 1998 source
boosteddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Supported
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“Simultaneously performing the tasks and studying the information would almost certainly cause cognitive overload (Kester et al., 2001;Marcus, Cooper, & Sweller, 1996).”
§ Taking the Load Off a Learner's Mind: Instructional Design for Complex Learning > Supportive Information
What the sources say
- Partly supportedcites Kester et al., 2001 sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
Section 2 recommends presenting supportive information before task clusters, and section 2.1 explains that working-memory capacity is limited. These passages support separating study of supportive information from task performance, but they do not say that doing both simultaneously would almost certainly cause cognitive overload. The Discussion (section 6) calls the preferred timing an assumption needing further support. (LLM, conf=0.82)
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Marcus, Cooper, & Sweller, 1996 source
boosteddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Rests on an assumption: The human mind has limited processing capacity.
- Partly supported
Every source the paper cites for this claim was checked and supports it.
In the paper
“The second is called procedural information and is best presented precisely when it is needed during task performance; it pertains to the how-to instructions for the application of rules (Kester, Kirschner, van Merriënboer, & Baumer, 2001).”
§ Taking the Load Off a Learner's Mind: Instructional Design for Complex Learning > JUST-IN-TIME INFORMATION PRESENTATION
What the sources say
- Supportedcites Kester, Kirschner, van Merriënboer, & Baumer, 2001 source
Section 2.1 states that prerequisite information is best presented during practice, when learners need it. Section 4.2.5 includes procedures for operating the system among that prerequisite information, supporting the citing sentence’s description of procedural how-to information. (LLM, conf=0.90)
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Supported
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“For subsequent task classes, only new (additional) supportive information should be presented-extending the set of interacting elements (Pollock et al., 2002).”
§ Taking the Load Off a Learner's Mind: Instructional Design for Complex Learning > Supportive Information
What the sources say
- Partly supportedcites Pollock et al., 2002 sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The paper describes a progression from isolated elements to learning their interactions in a second phase (Abstract; Results and Discussion). But it says that the second phase presented all the information needed for understanding, not only new or additional information. It does not prescribe this rule for subsequent task classes. (LLM, conf=0.84)
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Partly supported
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Such embedded support is clearly more effective than nonintegrated support (i.e., the parent running alongside and shouting”
§ Taking the Load Off a Learner's Mind: Instructional Design for Complex Learning > SCAFFOLDING WHOLE-TASK PRACTICE
boosteddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Rests on an assumption: Excessive or insufficient support can hamper the learning process.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“We conclude that CLT offers useful guidelines for decreasing intrinsic and extraneous cognitive load, so that sufficient processing capacity is left for genuine learning.”
§ Taking the Load Off a Learner's Mind: Instructional Design for Complex Learning > Abstract
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Rests on an assumption: The human mind has limited processing capacity.
In the paper
“Since then, there has been accumulating evidence that both part-task approaches to sequencing and instructional design models driven by separate objectives do not work well for complex performances that require the integration of skills, knowledge, and attitudes and the extensive coordination of constituent skills in new problem situations (see van Merriënboer, 1997, for a complete discussion).”
§ Taking the Load Off a Learner's Mind: Instructional Design for Complex Learning > Simple-to-Complex Sequencing
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites van Merriënboer, 1997
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“For novice learners, learning and performing conventional tasks are different and incompatible processes.”
§ Taking the Load Off a Learner's Mind: Instructional Design for Complex Learning > Types of Learning Tasks
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“But Naylor and Briggs (1963) already indicated in the early 1960s that they are not very suitable for learning complex tasks requiring much coordination between their distinct parts or constituent skills.”
§ Taking the Load Off a Learner's Mind: Instructional Design for Complex Learning > Simple-to-Complex Sequencing
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Naylor and Briggs (1963) source
hedged- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Each new task class contains learning tasks that are in the zone of proximal development of the learners (Vygotsky, 1934(Vygotsky, /1987)).”
§ Taking the Load Off a Learner's Mind: Instructional Design for Complex Learning > Simple-to-Complex Sequencing
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Vygotsky, 1934/1987
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Not matched
- It may state two separate claims as one. 13
- Probably not a substantial claim. 17
Every source the paper cites for this claim was checked and supports it.
In the paper
“Less elements and interactions between elements need to be processed simultaneously in working memory when performing the tasks in simpler task classes; for more complex task classes, the number of elements and interactions between elements increases (cf.Pollock, Chandler, & Sweller, 2002).”
§ Taking the Load Off a Learner's Mind: Instructional Design for Complex Learning > Simple-to-Complex Sequencing
What the sources say
- Supportedcites Pollock, Chandler, & Sweller, 2002 source
The Results and Discussion passage says complex material involves more interacting elements than working memory can process simultaneously unless they are incorporated into a schema. The passage on sources of cognitive load also describes a continuum from few elements with low interactivity to many elements with high interactivity, supporting the simpler-versus-more-complex comparison. (LLM, conf=0.92)
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Rests on an assumption: The human mind has limited processing capacity.
- Supported
A claim is checked only against the cited paper’s full text, never its abstract, and none is available for its sources.
In the paper
“CLT emphasizes the need to integrate support for novice learners with the task environment fully; otherwise, split-attention effects increase extraneous cognitive load because learners have to integrate information mentally from the task environment with the given support (Chandler & Sweller, 1992;Sweller & Chandler, 1994).”
§ Taking the Load Off a Learner's Mind: Instructional Design for Complex Learning > SCAFFOLDING WHOLE-TASK PRACTICE
What the sources say
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Rests on an assumption: The human mind has limited processing capacity.
In the paper
“There is overwhelming evidence that such conventional tasks are exceptionally expensive in terms of working memory capacity.They cause high-extraneous cognitive load due to the use of weak problem-solving methods (e.g., means-ends analysis), which bear little relation to schema construction processes that are concerned with learning to recognize problem states and their associated actions (Sweller”
§ Taking the Load Off a Learner's Mind: Instructional Design for Complex Learning > Types of Learning Tasks
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Sweller, 1988 source
boosteddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Rests on an assumption: The human mind has limited processing capacity.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“For information with a high-intrinsic complexity, it seems advisable to present the information before the learners start on the learning tasks.”
§ Taking the Load Off a Learner's Mind: Instructional Design for Complex Learning > JUST-IN-TIME INFORMATION PRESENTATION
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Rests on an assumption: The human mind has limited processing capacity.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Part-task approaches to sequencing are highly effective to prevent cognitive overload because the load associated with a part of the task is lower than the load associated with the whole task.”
§ Taking the Load Off a Learner's Mind: Instructional Design for Complex Learning > Simple-to-Complex Sequencing
boosteddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
- Rests on an assumption: The human mind has limited processing capacity.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“This necessary information must be active in working memory when performing the task to guide or influence behavior.”
§ Taking the Load Off a Learner's Mind: Instructional Design for Complex Learning > JUST-IN-TIME INFORMATION PRESENTATION
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
- Rests on an assumption: The human mind has limited processing capacity.
A claim is checked only against the cited paper’s full text, never its abstract, and none is available for its sources.
In the paper
“Goal-free tasks present the learner with a highly aspecific goal, which eliminates the need for means-ends search and so decreases extraneous cognitive load (Paas, Camp, & Rikers, 2001; also see Sweller et al., 1998, for an overview).”
§ Taking the Load Off a Learner's Mind: Instructional Design for Complex Learning > Types of Learning Tasks
What the sources say
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Whole-task approaches attend to the coordination and integration of constituent skills from the very beginning, and they stress that learners quickly develop a holistic vision of the whole task that is gradually embellished during the training.”
§ Taking the Load Off a Learner's Mind: Instructional Design for Complex Learning > Simple-to-Complex Sequencing
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Recent instructional theories stress authentic learning tasks as the driving force for learning; but due to the complexity of those tasks, learning may be hampered by the limited processing capacity of the human mind.”
- Also stated in: § Abstract · plain
“Recent instructional theories tend to focus on authentic learning tasks that are based on real-life tasks as the driving force for learning (Merrill, 2002;Reigeluth, 1999a;van Merriënboer & Kirschner, 2001).”
§ Taking the Load Off a Learner's Mind: Instructional Design for Complex Learning > Abstract
What the sources say
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
- Also stated in: § Abstract · plain
In the paper
“Fading is also important because the positive effects found for worked-out examples may reverse as learners acquire more expertise: If the necessary schemas for solving a problem are already available, analyzing a redundant worked-out example and integrating it with previously acquired schemas in working memory may impose higher cognitive load than problem solving (see Kalyuga, Ayres, Chandler, &”
§ Taking the Load Off a Learner's Mind: Instructional Design for Complex Learning > Types of Learning Tasks
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Kalyuga, Ayres, Chandler, & Sweller, 2003 source
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“it is critical to prevent split-attention effects when presenting this information.”
§ Taking the Load Off a Learner's Mind: Instructional Design for Complex Learning > Procedural Information
boosted- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The supportive information is presented in a just-in-time fashion to work on the nonrecurrent aspects of learning tasks within the same task class”
§ Taking the Load Off a Learner's Mind: Instructional Design for Complex Learning > A DESIGN MODEL FOR COMPLEX LEARNING
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The learning tasks within the same task class are equivalent in the sense that they may be performed on the basis of the same general knowledge (i.e., mental models and cognitive strategies that allow one to perform a version of the task with a particular complexity).”
§ Taking the Load Off a Learner's Mind: Instructional Design for Complex Learning > A DESIGN MODEL FOR COMPLEX LEARNING
hedged- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The procedural information, in contrast, is presented just in time to perform the consistent, recurrent aspects of the learning tasks”
§ Taking the Load Off a Learner's Mind: Instructional Design for Complex Learning > A DESIGN MODEL FOR COMPLEX LEARNING
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Supportive information may be helpful in performing the nonrecurrent aspects of learning tasks.”
§ Taking the Load Off a Learner's Mind: Instructional Design for Complex Learning > Procedural Information
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“each task class starts with one or more learning tasks with a high level of embedded support (e.g., worked-out examples), continues with learning tasks with a lower level of support (e.g., completion, goal-free, or reverse tasks), and ends with conventional tasks without support.”
§ Taking the Load Off a Learner's Mind: Instructional Design for Complex Learning > A DESIGN MODEL FOR COMPLEX LEARNING
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“It preferably takes the form of direct, step-by-step, or how-to instruction and is quickly faded away for subsequent learning tasks.”
§ Taking the Load Off a Learner's Mind: Instructional Design for Complex Learning > A DESIGN MODEL FOR COMPLEX LEARNING
hedged- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“For each subsequent task class, additional supportive information is presented to enable the learners to perform the more complex version of the whole task.”
§ Taking the Load Off a Learner's Mind: Instructional Design for Complex Learning > A DESIGN MODEL FOR COMPLEX LEARNING
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“These learning tasks will typically be performed by the learners in a simulated or real task environment and, ideally, confront them with all constituent skills that make up the whole complex skill.”
§ Taking the Load Off a Learner's Mind: Instructional Design for Complex Learning > A DESIGN MODEL FOR COMPLEX LEARNING
hedged- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“the cognitive load imposed by instructional designs should be the preeminent consideration when determining design structures.”
§ Taking the Load Off a Learner's Mind: Instructional Design for Complex Learning > DISCUSSION
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Rests on an assumption: Limited working memory is the most central aspect of human cognitive architecture.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“For those aspects, additional part-task practice may be provided-such as children drilling multiplication tables or musicians practicing musical scales.”
§ Taking the Load Off a Learner's Mind: Instructional Design for Complex Learning > A DESIGN MODEL FOR COMPLEX LEARNING
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
In the paper
“when learners have enough expertise, procedural information will become redundant and should thus be removed to decrease extraneous cognitive load (Kalyuga et al.,1998).”
§ Taking the Load Off a Learner's Mind: Instructional Design for Complex Learning > Procedural Information
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Kalyuga et al.,1998 source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Elaboration of the procedural information beforehand has no added value whatsoever; therefore, it is preferably presented precisely when learners need it.”
§ Taking the Load Off a Learner's Mind: Instructional Design for Complex Learning > Procedural Information
boosted- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The supportive information for each subsequent task class is an addition to or an embellishment of previous information-allowing learners to do things they could not do before.”
§ Taking the Load Off a Learner's Mind: Instructional Design for Complex Learning > Supportive Information
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“This process of induction is important for constructing new knowledge and, especially, for adapting existing schemas to make them more appropriate to the given experiences (Holland, Holyoak, Nisbett, & Thagard, 1986).”
§ Taking the Load Off a Learner's Mind: Instructional Design for Complex Learning > Supportive Information
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Holland, Holyoak, Nisbett, & Thagard, 1986
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“This four-component instructional design model (referred to hereafter as the 4C/ID model) presupposes that well-designed learning environments for complex learning always consist of four components: (a) learning tasks, (b) supportive information, (c) procedural information, and (d) part-task practice.”
§ Taking the Load Off a Learner's Mind: Instructional Design for Complex Learning > A DESIGN MODEL FOR COMPLEX LEARNING
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“This is repeated for each subsequent task class, yielding a saw-tooth pattern of support throughout the whole training program.”
§ Taking the Load Off a Learner's Mind: Instructional Design for Complex Learning > A DESIGN MODEL FOR COMPLEX LEARNING
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
None of the sources cited for this claim could be matched to a paper in Crossref, so there is nothing to check it against.
In the paper
“They are highly domain specific and allow only for the same use of the same knowledge for performing recurrent aspects of tasks.”
§ Taking the Load Off a Learner's Mind: Instructional Design for Complex Learning > Procedural Information
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Anderson, 1993
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Not matchedcites Anderson, 1996
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Not matchedcites Newell, 1991
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
The authors state this as an assumption.
Authentic learning tasks help learners integrate knowledge, skills, and attitudes; coordinate constituent skills; and transfer what is learned to daily life or work settings.
“The general assumption is that such tasks help learners to integrate the knowledge, skills, and attitudes necessary for effective task performance; give them the opportunity to learn to coordinate constituent skills that make up complex task performance; and eventually enable them to transfer what is learned to their daily life or work settings.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The human mind has limited processing capacity.
“due to the complexity of those tasks, learning may be hampered by the limited processing capacity of the human mind.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Excessive or insufficient support can hamper the learning process.
“Because excessive or insufficient support can hamper the learning process, it is critical to determine the right type and amount of support and to fade at the appropriate time and rate.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Recent instructional theories tend to focus on real-life tasks as the driving force for learning.
“This article started from the observation that recent instructional theories tend to focus on real-life tasks as the driving force for learning.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Limited working memory is the most central aspect of human cognitive architecture.
“limited working memory is no doubt the most central aspect of human cognitive architecture.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Real-life tasks are typically associated with a very high cognitive load.
“Such tasks are typically associated with a very high-cognitive load”
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Certain authors have suggested, for example, that the learner's cognitive load is reduced with the aid of scaffolding and that this thus allows the learner to perform parts of a task that he or she would otherwise not be able to perform”
From Scaffolding in Teacher–Student Interaction: A Decade of Research (2010) · cites this paper as Van Merriënboer et al. 2003
In the citing paper
“For the automation of schemas, compilation and strengthening are the most relevant cognitive processes (Anderson 2000;Van Merriënboer 1997;Van Merriënboer et al. 2003).”
From Interactivity in Video-based Models (2007) · cites this paper as Van Merriënboer et al. 2003
In the citing paper
“To construct adequate schemas two types of cognitive processes are important; elaboration and induction (Van Merriënboer 1997;Van Merriënboer et al. 2003).”
From Interactivity in Video-based Models (2007) · cites this paper as Van Merriënboer et al. 2003
Citations
Cites
The magical number seven, plus or minus two: Some limits on our capacity for processing information.
Miller, G. A. (1994) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.101.2.343 · Cited by 17,559
Cognitive Load During Problem Solving: Effects on Learning
Sweller, J. (1988) · Cognitive Science · doi:10.1016/0364-0213(88)90023-7 · Cited by 11,048
Axten, N., Newell, A., & Simon, H. A. (1973) · Contemporary Sociology A Journal of Reviews · doi:10.2307/2063712 · Cited by 6,886
Newell, A. (1972) · Cited by 6,222
Cognitive Architecture and Instructional Design
Sweller, J., van Merrienboer, J. J. G., & Paas, F. G. W. C. (1998) · Educational Psychology Review · doi:10.1023/a:1022193728205 · Cited by 6,023
(1991) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.28-5376 · Cited by 4,218
(1987) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 2,399
Induction: Processes of Inference, Learning, and Discovery
Holland, J. H., Holyoak, K. J., Nisbett, R. E., Thagard, P. R., & Smoliar, S. W. (1987) · IEEE Expert · doi:10.1109/mex.1987.4307100 · Cited by 2,305
Instructional Design Theories and Models
(1983) · doi:10.4324/9780203824283 · Cited by 2,192 · cited 1×
“Instructional theories developed in the 1960s and 1970s (see Reigeluth, 1983) typically advocated the use of part-task approaches to avoid early exposure to tasks that are too complex.”
BackgroundPaas, F. G. W. C. (1992) · Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-0663.84.4.429 · Cited by 2,150
Research works printed but not linked: 7
- [13]13. Jonassen, D. H. (1999). Designing constructivist learning environments. In C. M. Reigeluth (Ed.), Instructional design theories and models: A new paradigm of instructional theory (Vol. 2, pp. 371-396).
- [22]22. Miller, G. A. (1956). The magical number seven plus or minus two. Psycho- logical Review, 63, 81-96.
- [34]34. Reigeluth, C. M. (1999b). The elaboration theory: Guidance for scope and sequence decisions. In C. M. Reigeluth (Ed.), Instructional design theo- ries and models: A new paradigm of instructional theory (Vol. 2, pp. 425-453).
- [37]37. Romiszowski, A. (1997). Web-based distance learning and teaching: Revo- lutionary invention or reaction to necessity? In B. Khan (Ed.), Web-based instruction (pp. 25-37). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology Publications.
- [38]38. Rosenshine, B. V., & Meister, C. (1992). The use of scaffolds for teaching less structured cognitive tasks. Educational Leadership, 49(7), 26-33.
- [39]39. Scandura, J. M. (1983). Instructional strategies based on the structural learn- ing theory. In C. M. Reigeluth (Ed.), Instructional design theories and models (pp. 213-246). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
- [40]40. Schank, R. C., Berman, T. R., & MacPerson, K. A. (1999). Learning by do- ing. In C. M. Reigeluth (Ed.), Instructional design theories and models: A new paradigm of instructional theory (Vol. 2, pp. 161-181).
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Cognitive Architecture and Instructional Design: 20 Years Later
Sweller, J., van Merriënboer, J. J. G., & Paas, F. (2019) · Educational Psychology Review · doi:10.1007/s10648-019-09465-5 · Cited by 2,337
Self-citationCognitive Load Theory and Complex Learning: Recent Developments and Future Directions
van Merriënboer, J. J. G., & Sweller, J. (2005) · Educational Psychology Review · doi:10.1007/s10648-005-3951-0 · Cited by 2,206
“Complex learning aims at the integration of knowledge, skills, and attitudes; the coordination of qualitatively different constituent skills; and the transfer of what is learned to daily life or work settings (van Merriënboer et al., 2003).”
BackgroundKalyuga, S., Ayres, P., Chandler, P., & Sweller, J. (2003) · Educational Psychologist · doi:10.1207/s15326985ep3801_4 · Cited by 1,927
Scaffolding in Teacher–Student Interaction: A Decade of Research
van de Pol, J., Volman, M., & Beishuizen, J. (2010) · Educational Psychology Review · doi:10.1007/s10648-010-9127-6 · Cited by 1,873
“1 This chapter is based on: Van de Pol, J., Volman, M., & Beishuizen, J. (2010).”
InfluentialCognitive load theory in health professional education: design principles and strategies
Van Merriënboer, J. J. G., & Sweller, J. (2010) · Medical Education · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2923.2009.03498.x · Cited by 1,511
Self-citationCognitive load theory, educational research, and instructional design: some food for thought
de Jong, T. (2010) · Instructional Science · doi:10.1007/s11251-009-9110-0 · Cited by 1,180
Paas, F., Renkl, A., & Sweller, J. (2004) · Instructional Science · doi:10.1023/b:truc.0000021806.17516.d0 · Cited by 1,054
“Salden, Paas, Broers and Van Merriënboer provide a procedure for the dynamic selection of tasks based on performance, mental effort or mental efficiency.”
BackgroundInfluentialExpertise Reversal Effect and Its Implications for Learner-Tailored Instruction
Kalyuga, S. (2007) · Educational Psychology Review · doi:10.1007/s10648-007-9054-3 · Cited by 1,056
Bell, B. S., & Kozlowski, S. W. J. (2008) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.93.2.296 · Cited by 710
“The scales, which were adapted from Horvath, Scheu, and DeShon (2001), treat state mastery, performance-prove, and performance-avoid orientations as separate constructs, to ensure distinction from the VandeWalle (1997) trait measures of goal orientation.”
Nahum-Shani, I., Hekler, E. B., & Spruijt-Metz, D. (2015) · Health Psychology · doi:10.1037/hea0000306 · Cited by 568
Renkl, A., & Atkinson, R. K. (2003) · Educational Psychologist · doi:10.1207/s15326985ep3801_3 · Cited by 540
A Cognitive Load Approach to Collaborative Learning: United Brains for Complex Tasks
Kirschner, F., Paas, F., & Kirschner, P. A. (2009) · Educational Psychology Review · doi:10.1007/s10648-008-9095-2 · Cited by 547
Self-citationThree worlds of CSCL: Can we support CSCL?
van den Berg, E., Blijleven, P. J., Koertshuis, E., & Tebbe, N. M. (2002) · University of Twente Research Information · Cited by 498
User‐centered design for psychosocial intervention development and implementation.
Lyon, A. R., & Koerner, K. (2016) · Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice · doi:10.1111/cpsp.12154 · Cited by 478
Sweller, J. (2004) · Instructional Science · doi:10.1023/b:truc.0000021808.72598.4d · Cited by 470
Classification of learning outcomes: evidence from the computer games literature
O’Neil, H. F., Wainess, R., & Baker, E. L. (2005) · The Curriculum Journal · doi:10.1080/09585170500384529 · Cited by 472
“With respect to scaffolding, while there are a number of definitions (e.g. van Merrienboer et al., 2002, 2003; Chalmers, 2003), what they all have in common is that scaffolding is an instructional method that provides support during learning by reducing cognitive load.”
BackgroundWhy Minimally Guided Teaching Techniques Do Not Work: A Reply to Commentaries
SWELLER, J., KIRSCHNER, P. A., & CLARK, R. E. (2007) · Educational Psychologist · doi:10.1080/00461520701263426 · Cited by 434
Self-citationLee, S. J., Srinivasan, S., Trail-Constant, T., Lewis, D., & Lopez, S. (2011) · The Internet and Higher Education · doi:10.1016/j.iheduc.2011.04.001 · Cited by 425
Paas, F., Tuovinen, J. E., van Merriënboer, J. J. G., & Aubteen Darabi, A. (2005) · Educational Technology Research and Development · doi:10.1007/bf02504795 · Cited by 401
Research on cognitive load theory and its design implications for e-learning
van Merriënboer, J. J. G., & Ayres, P. (2005) · Educational Technology Research and Development · doi:10.1007/bf02504793 · Cited by 428
Self-citationBarzilai, S., & Blau, I. (2013) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2013.08.003 · Cited by 419
Applying learning theories and instructional design models for effective instruction
Khalil, M. K., & Elkhider, I. A. (2016) · Advances in Physiology Education · doi:10.1152/advan.00138.2015 · Cited by 372
“The 4C/ID model (45, 46) mainly deals with complex learning and has four components.”
MethodStudying the effect of AI Code Generators on Supporting Novice Learners in Introductory Programming
Kazemitabaar, M., Chow, J., Ma, C. K. T., Ericson, B. J., Weintrop, D., & Grossman, T. (2023) · Proceedings of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3544548.3580919 · Cited by 366
“Several approaches have been developed to reduce this cognitive load in introductory programming, such as the use of worked examples and similar practice problems [72, 84], or mixed-up code (Parsons) problems [64], where learners are given mixed up fragments that must be placed in the correct order to solve a problem.”
Tyler-Smith, K. (2006) · Journal of online learning and teaching · Cited by 336
van Merriënboer, J. J. G., Kester, L., & Paas, F. (2006) · Applied Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1002/acp.1250 · Cited by 320
Self-citationFinding and fixing errors in worked examples: Can this foster learning outcomes?
Große, C. S., & Renkl, A. (2007) · Learning and Instruction · doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2007.09.008 · Cited by 342
Emotion, cognitive load and learning outcomes during simulation training
Fraser, K. L., Ma, I. W. Y., Teteris, E., Baxter, H., Wright, B. J., & McLaughlin, K. (2012) · Medical Education · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2923.2012.04355.x · Cited by 341
Cognitive Load Theory for the Design of Medical Simulations
Fraser, K. L., Ayres, P., & Sweller, J. (2015) · Simulation in Healthcare: The Journal of the Society for Simulation in Healthcare · doi:10.1097/sih.0000000000000097 · Cited by 306
“By reducing tasks into manageable chunks and practicing each chunk until it is effectively stored in long-term memory, a large amount of information can eventually be manipulated in working memory in the form of these chunks.(51) This concept is applied routinely in healthcare training when students are instructed in…”
BackgroundCognitive Load and Classroom Teaching: The Double-Edged Sword of Automaticity
Feldon, D. F. (2007) · Educational Psychologist · doi:10.1080/00461520701416173 · Cited by 334
Mayer, R. E., Fennell, S., Farmer, L., & Campbell, J. (2004) · Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-0663.96.2.389 · Cited by 298
Butcher, K. R. (2014) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139547369.010 · Cited by 331
How Fading Worked Solution Steps Works – A Cognitive Load Perspective
Renkl, A., Atkinson, R. K., & Große, C. S. (2004) · Instructional Science · doi:10.1023/b:truc.0000021815.74806.f6 · Cited by 272
Gerjets, P., Scheiter, K., & Catrambone, R. (2004) · Instructional Science · doi:10.1023/b:truc.0000021809.10236.71 · Cited by 251
“However, the assumption that intrinsic cognitive load cannot be manipulated is not uncontroversial (cf. van Merriënboer, Kirschner, & Kester, 2003).”
BackgroundResultInfluentialRethinking the Boundaries of Cognitive Load Theory in Complex Learning
Kalyuga, S., & Singh, A.-M. (2016) · Educational Psychology Review · doi:10.1007/s10648-015-9352-0 · Cited by 241
Clarke, T., Ayres, P., & Sweller, J. (2005) · Educational Technology Research and Development · doi:10.1007/bf02504794 · Cited by 227
“van Merriënboer et al. (2003) have argued that”
BackgroundResultInfluentialHow to Optimize Learning From Animated Models: A Review of Guidelines Based on Cognitive Load
Wouters, P., Paas, F., & van Merriënboer, J. J. G. (2008) · Review of Educational Research · doi:10.3102/0034654308320320 · Cited by 224
“Whole tasks with increasing complexity can be constructed by varying these conditions—for instance, learners have to conduct a search in several databases with many search terms that have to be connected with and and or operators (van Merriënboer et al., 2003).”
BackgroundSelf-citationBlomberg, G., Sherin, M. G., Renkl, A., Glogger‐Frey, I., & Seidel, T. (2013) · Instructional Science · doi:10.1007/s11251-013-9281-6 · Cited by 257
Measuring Knowledge to Optimize Cognitive Load Factors During Instruction.
Kalyuga, S., & Sweller, J. (2004) · Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-0663.96.3.558 · Cited by 219
Optimizing cognitive load for learning from computer-based science simulations.
Lee, H., Plass, J. L., & Homer, B. D. (2006) · Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-0663.98.4.902 · Cited by 227
Impact of reducing intrinsic cognitive load on learning in a mathematical domain
Ayres, P. (2006) · Applied Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1002/acp.1245 · Cited by 212
The worked-example effect: Not an artefact of lousy control conditions
Schwonke, R., Renkl, A., Krieg, C., Wittwer, J., Aleven, V. A. W. M. M., & Salden, R. (2008) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2008.12.011 · Cited by 215
The promised land of blended learning: Quizzes as a moderator
Spanjers, I. A. E., Könings, K. D., Leppink, J., Verstegen, D. M. L., de Jong, N., Czabanowska, K., & van Merriënboer, J. J. G. (2015) · Educational Research Review · doi:10.1016/j.edurev.2015.05.001 · Cited by 236
Self-citationNoh, J., & Lee, J. (2020) · Educational Technology Research and Development · doi:10.1007/s11423-019-09708-w · Cited by 207
“The four-component instructional design (4C/ID) model distinguishes complex tasks from simple tasks (Van Merriënboer and Kirschner 2012; Van Merriënboer et al. 2003).”
MethodCognitive Load Theory: Historical Development and Relation to Other Theories
Moreno, R., & Park, B. (2010) · Cognitive Load Theory · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511844744.003 · Cited by 204
Chatbot-assisted dynamic assessment (CA-DA) for L2 vocabulary learning and diagnosis
Jeon, J. (2023) · Computer Assisted Language Learning · doi:10.1080/09588221.2021.1987272 · Cited by 202
An Integrative Theory of Motivation, Volition, and Performance
Keller, J. M. (2008) · Cited by 186
Choi, I., & Lee, K. (2008) · Educational Technology Research and Development · doi:10.1007/s11423-008-9089-2 · Cited by 187
Agustian, H. Y., & Seery, M. K. (2017) · Chemistry Education Research and Practice · doi:10.1039/c7rp00140a · Cited by 181
Gerjets, P., Scheiter, K., & Catrambone, R. (2006) · Learning and Instruction · doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2006.02.007 · Cited by 178
The worked example effect, the generation effect, and element interactivity.
Chen, O., Kalyuga, S., & Sweller, J. (2015) · Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1037/edu0000018 · Cited by 167
Wikis to support the “collaborative” part of collaborative learning
Lárusson, J. A., & Alterman, R. (2009) · International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning · doi:10.1007/s11412-009-9076-6 · Cited by 166
“In education, scaffolding refers to the support, " devices, " and/or " strategies " offered that guide students in carrying out their learning activity so as to maximize the educational " profit " (Collins 2006; van Merriënboer et al. 2003; Ward and Tiessen 1997).”
BackgroundPrior Knowledge Principle in Multimedia Learning
Kalyuga, S. (2005) · The Cambridge Handbook of Multimedia Learning · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511816819.022 · Cited by 166
Five Common but Questionable Principles of Multimedia Learning
Clark, R. E., & Feldon, D. F. (2005) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511816819.007 · Cited by 162
Eysink, T. H. S., de Jong, T., Berthold, K., Kolloffel, B., Opfermann, M., & Wouters, P. (2009) · American Educational Research Journal · doi:10.3102/0002831209340235 · Cited by 158
Artino, A. R. (2008) · Cited by 155
van Merriënboer, J. J. G., & Kester, L. (2014) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139547369.007 · Cited by 162
Self-citationvan Merriënboer, J. J. G., & Sluijsmans, D. M. A. (2009) · Educational Psychology Review · doi:10.1007/s10648-008-9092-5 · Cited by 156
“Keywords Cognitive load theory A tendency in modern education is to use rich learning tasks, which are based on real-life situations from daily or professional life, as a basis for complex learning (van Merriënboer 2007; van Merriënboer and Kester 2007; van Merriënboer et al. 2003).”
BackgroundBelland, B., Glazewski, K., & Richardson, J. (2008) · Educational Technology Research and Development · doi:10.1007/s11423-007-9074-1 · Cited by 160
Ge, X., Chen, C., & Davis, K. A. (2005) · Journal of Educational Computing Research · doi:10.2190/5f6j-hhvf-2u2b-8t3g · Cited by 147
“…engaging learners in ill-structured problem solving is insufficient, appropriate instructional scaffolds or support should be provided and embedded in the learning environment to guide learners during their work on complex, ill-structured learning tasks (van Merriënboer, Kirschner, & Kester, 2003).”
BackgroundWu, J., Guo, R., Wang, Z., & Zeng, R. (2019) · Interactive Learning Environments · doi:10.1080/10494820.2019.1587469 · Cited by 147
Interactivity in Video-based Models
Wouters, P., Tabbers, H. K., & Paas, F. (2007) · Educational Psychology Review · doi:10.1007/s10648-007-9045-4 · Cited by 145
“For the automation of schemas, compilation and strengthening are the most relevant cognitive processes (Anderson 2000; Van Merriënboer 1997; Van Merriënboer et al. 2003).”
MethodInfluentialKirschner, P. A., Martens, R. L., & Strijbos, J.-W. (2004) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/1-4020-7921-4_1 · Cited by 142
Self-citationWhen online reviews meet virtual reality: Effects on consumer hotel booking
Zeng, G., Cao, X., Lin, Z., & Xiao, S. H. (2020) · Annals of Tourism Research · doi:10.1016/j.annals.2020.102860 · Cited by 150
Effects of segmenting, signalling, and weeding on learning from educational video
Ibrahim, M. M., Antonenko, P., Greenwood, C., & Wheeler, D. (2011) · Learning Media and Technology · doi:10.1080/17439884.2011.585993 · Cited by 169
Theorising hybrid lifelong learning
Nørgård, R. T. (2021) · British Journal of Educational Technology · doi:10.1111/bjet.13121 · Cited by 184
Austin, K. A. (2009) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2009.06.017 · Cited by 148
Winberg, M., & Berg, C. A. R. (2007) · Journal of Research in Science Teaching · doi:10.1002/tea.20217 · Cited by 138
Fletcher, J. D., & Tobias, S. (2005) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511816819.008 · Cited by 183
Towards a personalized task selection model with shared instructional control
Corbalan, G., Kester, L., & van Merriënboer, J. J. G. (2006) · Instructional Science · doi:10.1007/s11251-005-5774-2 · Cited by 134
Self-citationJohnson, A. M., Özoğul, G., & Martin Reisslein, B. (2014) · Journal of Computer Assisted Learning · doi:10.1111/jcal.12078 · Cited by 129
Elander, J., Harrington, K., Norton, L., Robinson, H. J., & Reddy, P. S. (2005) · Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/02602930500262379 · Cited by 134
Learning to Troubleshoot: A New Theory-Based Design Architecture
Jonassen, D. H., & Hung, W. (2006) · Educational Psychology Review · doi:10.1007/s10648-006-9001-8 · Cited by 126
Schema Acquisition and Sources of Cognitive Load
Kalyuga, S. (2010) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511844744.005 · Cited by 133
The Expertise Reversal Principle in Multimedia Learning
Kalyuga, S. (2014) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139547369.028 · Cited by 134
Solving parsons problems versus fixing and writing code
Ericson, B. J., Margulieux, L. E., & Rick, J. (2017) · Proceedings of the 17th Koli Calling International Conference on Computing Education Research · doi:10.1145/3141880.3141895 · Cited by 121
Thrive or overload? The effect of task complexity on novices’ simulation‐based learning
Haji, F. A., Cheung, J. J. H., Woods, N. N., Regehr, G., de Ribaupierre, S., & Dubrowski, A. (2016) · Medical Education · doi:10.1111/medu.13086 · Cited by 131
Training Older Adults To Use New Technology
Hickman, J. M., Rogers, W. A., & Fisk, A. D. (2007) · The Journals of Gerontology Series B · doi:10.1093/geronb/62.special_issue_1.77 · Cited by 126
Kester, L., Kirschner, P. A., & van Merriënboer, J. J. G. (2005) · British Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1348/000709904x19254 · Cited by 115
Self-citationEnhancing Cognitive Function Using Perceptual-Cognitive Training
Parsons, B., Magill, T., Boucher, A., Zhang, M., Zogbo, K., Bérubé, S., Scheffer, O., Beauregard, M., & Faubert, J. (2014) · Clinical EEG and Neuroscience · doi:10.1177/1550059414563746 · Cited by 130
“It is important to note that in any learning paradigm, overloading should be maintained within a range to ensure it falls within the zone of proximal development.(12) Speed thresholds ensure an appropriate level of overload.”
BackgroundKhalil, M. K., PAAS, F. G. W. C., Johnson, T. E., & Payer, A. F. (2005) · The Anatomical Record Part B The New Anatomist · doi:10.1002/ar.b.20077 · Cited by 119
When worked examples don't work: Is cognitive load theory at an Impasse?
Moreno, R. (2006) · Learning and Instruction · doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2006.02.006 · Cited by 126
Song, H. S., Kalet, A. L., & Plass, J. L. (2015) · Journal of Computer Assisted Learning · doi:10.1111/jcal.12117 · Cited by 115
Performance Effects Related to the Sequence of Integration of Healthcare Technologies
Angst, C. M., Devaraj, S., Queenan, C., & Greenwood, B. N. (2011) · Production and Operations Management · doi:10.1111/j.1937-5956.2011.01218.x · Cited by 103
To Scroll or Not to Scroll: Scrolling, Working Memory Capacity, and Comprehending Complex Texts
Sanchez, C. A., & Wiley, J. (2009) · Human Factors The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society · doi:10.1177/0018720809352788 · Cited by 106
“…memory for the text (e.g., representing the information and its location), this requirement could place a load on the reader that would reduce comprehension (Mayer & Moreno, 2003; Paas, Renkl, & Sweller, 2003; Sweller, Chandler, Tierney, & Cooper, 1990; van Merriënboer, Kirschner, & Kester, 2003).”
BackgroundThe Cognitive Load of Geographic Information
Bunch, R. L., & Lloyd, R. E. (2006) · The Professional Geographer · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9272.2006.00527.x · Cited by 104
(2013) · Task-based language teaching · doi:10.1075/tblt · Cited by 102
Dynamic task selection: Effects of feedback and learner control on efficiency and motivation
Corbalan, G., Kester, L., & van Merriënboer, J. J. G. (2008) · Learning and Instruction · doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2008.07.002 · Cited by 109
Self-citationDesigning instruction for complex learning: 4C/ID in higher education
Frèrejean, J., van Merriënboer, J. J. G., Kirschner, P. A., Roex, A., Aertgeerts, B., & Marcellis, M. (2019) · European Journal of Education · doi:10.1111/ejed.12363 · Cited by 104
“(For a more extensive description of the model, see van Merriënboer, 1997; van Merriënboer et al., 2003; or van Merriënboer & Kirschner, 2018).”
BackgroundSelf-citationLearning from failure: a meta-analysis of the empirical studies
Darabi, A., Arrington, T. L., & Sayilir, E. (2018) · Educational Technology Research and Development · doi:10.1007/s11423-018-9579-9 · Cited by 99
“…decades, instructional designers have been concentrating on facilitating learners’ achievement of learning objectives through formulating design of instruction to minimize the learners’ cognitive load caused by confusion and misunderstanding (e.g., Dick et al. 2014; van Merriënboer et al. 2003).”
BackgroundA Framework for Learning in the Chemistry Laboratory
Seery, M. K., Agustian, H. Y., & Zhang, X. (2018) · Israel Journal of Chemistry · doi:10.1002/ijch.201800093 · Cited by 116
Rate or Trade? Identifying Winning Ideas in Open Idea Sourcing
Blohm, I., Riedl, C., Füller, J., & Leimeister, J. M. (2016) · Information Systems Research · doi:10.1287/isre.2015.0605 · Cited by 98
“The working memory processes all conscious cognitive tasks and can handle only a limited number of information elements (Van Merrienboer et al. 2003).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialAssessment of learners' organised knowledge structures in adaptive learning environments
Kalyuga, S. (2006) · Applied Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1002/acp.1249 · Cited by 96
Ten Steps to Complex Learning: A New Approach to Instruction and Instructional Design
Kirschner, P. A., & van Merriënboer, J. J. G. (2008) · Sage eBooks · doi:10.4135/9781412964012.n26 · Cited by 102
Self-citationFacilitating Flexible Problem Solving: A Cognitive Load Perspective
Kalyuga, S., Renkl, A., & PAAS, F. G. W. C. (2010) · Educational Psychology Review · doi:10.1007/s10648-010-9132-9 · Cited by 92
“Therefore, it is essential to select appropriate levels of instructional guidance or support for complex task performance that is dynamically tailored to learning situations and cognitive characteristics of learners (van Merriënboer et al. 2003).”
BackgroundLearning programming via worked-examples: Relation of learning styles to cognitive load
Abdul-Rahman, S.-S., & du Boulay, B. (2013) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2013.09.007 · Cited by 99
Improving course evaluations to improve instruction and complex learning in higher education
Frick, T. W., Chadha, R., Watson, C., & Zlatkovska, E. (2009) · Educational Technology Research and Development · doi:10.1007/s11423-009-9131-z · Cited by 89
Kalyuga, S. (2009) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2008.12.019 · Cited by 95
Can we support CSCL? Educational, social and technological affordances for learning
Kirschner, P. A. (2002) · DSpace (Open University in the Netherlands) · Cited by 92
Self-citationKicken, W., Brand‐Gruwel, S., & van Merriënboer, J. J. G. (2008) · Journal of Vocational Education and Training · doi:10.1080/13636820802305561 · Cited by 92
Self-citationLaker, L. F., Froehle, C. M., Windeler, J. B., & Lindsell, C. J. (2017) · Production and Operations Management · doi:10.1111/poms.12777 · Cited by 87
Metadata
- Authors
- van Merrienboer, J. J. G., Kirschner, P. A., & Kester, L.
- Affiliations
- Open University of the Netherlands (NL)
- ORCID
- Kirschner, Paul A.
- Venue
- Educational Psychologist
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2003-01-01
- Volume
- 38
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 5-13
- ISSN
- 0046-1520 (ISSN-L)
- 1532-6985
- OpenAlex
- W2127791224
- Semantic Scholar
- 5672feb8343dabd71bddf54a434d641ca7a5b7b8
- Cited by
- 857
- References
- 89
- Citations by year
- 2026: 28 · 2025: 51 · 2024: 27 · 2023: 33 · 2022: 36 · 2021: 36 · 2020: 44 · 2019: 43 · 2018: 41 · 2017: 28 · 2016: 45 · 2015: 48 · 2014: 44 · 2013: 43 · 2012: 42
- FWCI
- 39.13
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Educational Psychologist (publishedVersion)
- Utrecht University Repository (Utrecht University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Visual and Cognitive Learning Processes
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Educational Strategies and Epistemologies
- Keywords
- complex learning, cognitive load theory, scaffolding, instructional design, authentic learning tasks, transfer of learning, design model
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-10-11, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).
A second model labelled each claim on 2026-10-11 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).
Cited sources are checked with a language model’s help (gpt-6-sol).
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
