The DOI matches its Crossref record; 65 of the 65 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; none of the 77 sources its claims cite is checked for support yet.
Dose-Dependent Effects of Endotoxin on Neurobehavioral Functions in Humans
Open accessAbstract
Clinical and experimental evidence document that inflammation and increased peripheral cytokine levels are associated with depression-like symptoms and neuropsychological disturbances in humans. However, it remains unclear whether and to what extent cognitive functions like memory and attention are affected by and related to the dose of the inflammatory stimulus. Thus, in a cross-over, double-blind, experimental approach, healthy male volunteers were administered with either placebo or bacterial lipopolysaccharide (LPS) at doses of 0.4 (n = 18) or 0.8 ng/kg of body weight (n = 16). Pro- and anti-inflammatory cytokines, norephinephrine and cortisol concentrations were analyzed before and 1, 1.75, 3, 4, 6, and 24 h after injection. In addition, changes in mood and anxiety levels were determined together with working memory (n-back task) and long term memory performance (recall of emotional and neutral pictures of the International Affective Picture System). Endotoxin administration caused a profound transient physiological response with dose-related elevations in body temperature and heart rate, increases in plasma interleukin (IL)-6, IL-10, tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α and IL-1 receptor antagonist (IL-1ra), salivary and plasma cortisol, and plasma norepinephrine. These changes were accompanied by dose-related decreased mood and increased anxiety levels. LPS administration did not affect accuracy in working memory performance but improved reaction time in the high-dose LPS condition compared to the control conditon. In contrast, long-term memory performance was impaired selectively for emotional stimuli after administration of the lower but not of the higher dose of LPS. These data suggest the existence of at least two counter-acting mechanisms, one promoting and one inhibiting cognitive performance during acute systemic inflammation.
Overview
AI snapshot
Written from the paper’s full text.
TL;DR
In a double-blind, crossover human endotoxemia study, LPS at 0.4 or 0.8 ng/kg induced transient inflammatory, neuroendocrine, and mood/anxiety changes in healthy men. Working memory accuracy was unaffected while high-dose LPS improved reaction time, and low-dose LPS selectively impaired long-term memory for emotional pictures.
Key findings
- Endotoxin increased body temperature and heart rate in both dose groups without significant differences between doses, and increased plasma IL-6, TNF-α, IL-10, IL-1ra, plasma/salivary cortisol, and norepinephrine; TNF-α, IL-10, and IL-1ra showed dose-related differences, while IL-6 did not.
- Positive mood, calmness, and alertness decreased 3 h after endotoxin in both groups, and state anxiety increased; the positive-mood decrease was larger in the high-dose group (−6.00 vs. −2.06 at 3 h).
- Working memory accuracy was unaffected (F = 0.20, p > 0.05; low-dose: 15.9 ± 5.4 vs. 15.2 ± 5.0), but reaction time improved by 27.6 ms in the high-dose group (504.9 ± 71.5 ms vs. 532.5 ± 59.3 ms; t = 3.21, p < 0.01).
- Long-term memory for emotional stimuli was impaired after low-dose LPS (6.4 ± 2.4 vs. 7.8 ± 2.4; t = 2.88, p < 0.05) but not after high-dose LPS (8.5 ± 1.8 vs. 8.5 ± 1.3); neutral memory was not significantly affected in either group, with a trend toward impairment after high-dose LPS (5.9 ± 2.0 vs. 6.8 ± 1.7; t = 2.09, p = 0.10).
Methods
- Placebo-controlled, double-blind, crossover study in 34 healthy male volunteers randomized to low-dose LPS (0.4 ng/kg, n = 18) or high-dose LPS (0.8 ng/kg, n = 16); each participant received LPS and saline on separate days 10–14 days apart.
- Blood and saliva were sampled before and 1, 1.75, 3, 4, 6, and 24 h after injection; cytokines were measured by multiplex bead-based assays, and cortisol/norepinephrine by ELISA. Mood/anxiety were assessed with MDBF and STAI at baseline, 3 h, and 6 h; working memory used a 2-back task, and long-term memory used IAPS picture acquisition before 3 h and recall 24 h later.
- Analyses used repeated-measures ANOVA with Bonferroni post hoc tests, paired/unpaired t-tests, and Pearson correlations with Bonferroni correction; p < 0.05 was considered significant.
Limitations
- Stated: the exact nature of possible compensatory mechanisms and whether the compensatory effect on memory performance is paralleled by or due to increased attention need future studies; effects on consolidation and retrieval remain unknown.
- Evident: the sample was restricted to healthy young male volunteers (n = 34; age ranges 19–33 years), so findings may not generalize to women, older adults, or clinical populations.
- Evident: mechanistic interpretations rely on peripheral cytokine, hormone, and behavioral measures without direct neural measures in this study.
Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
0 of 77 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In general, subjects recognized emotional stimuli better compared to stimuli with neutral content indicated by a pronounced emotionality effect (F = 26.26, p<0.001, emotionality×treatment×group ANOVA) (Fig. 7).”
§ Dose-Dependent Effects of Endotoxin on Neurobehavioral Functions in Humans > Results > Memory
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesA result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In contrast, long term-memory for emotional but not for neutral stimuli was significantly impaired by the administration of low-dose LPS, whereas in the high-dose LPS condition memory remained unaffected.”
- Also stated in: § Discussion · plain
“Administration of low-dose LPS 3 h before acquisition impaired memory performance for emotional but not for neutral stimuli.”
§ Dose-Dependent Effects of Endotoxin on Neurobehavioral Functions in Humans > Discussion
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passes- Also stated in: § Discussion · plain
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In addition, higher LPS concentration (0.8 ng/kg) further increased TNF-α, IL-10 and IL-1ra plasma concentrations, but not plasma levels of IL-6, cortisol, or norepinephrine.”
§ Dose-Dependent Effects of Endotoxin on Neurobehavioral Functions in Humans > Discussion
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesA result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“LPS administration did not affect accuracy in working memory, however induced a significant improvement in reaction time in the high-dose LPS condition.”
- Also stated in: § Discussion · plain
“We did not find any effect on accuracy in the n-back test, reflected by the number of correct responses minus the number of false reactions, neither in the low- nor high-dose LPS condition.”
§ Dose-Dependent Effects of Endotoxin on Neurobehavioral Functions in Humans > Discussion
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passes- Also stated in: § Discussion · plain
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Self-reported positive mood (low-dose: F = 6.21, p = 0.01; high-dose: F = 25.97, p<0.001), calmness (low-dose: F = 6.42, p<0.01; high-dose: F = 5.52, p<0.01), and alertness (low-dose: F = 5.07, p<0.01; high-dose: F = 7.09, p<0.01), were significantly decreased 3 h after endotoxin injection in both groups.”
§ Dose-Dependent Effects of Endotoxin on Neurobehavioral Functions in Humans > Results > Mood & Anxiety
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesA result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Both, low-dose and high-dose LPS treatment significantly increased body temperature (Fig. 2A; low-dose: F = 13.18, p<0.001; high-dose: F = 14.11, p<0.001) and heart rate (Fig. 2B; low-dose: F = 10.49, p<0.001, high-dose: F = 9.12, p<0.001) without significant differences between LPS doses.”
§ Dose-Dependent Effects of Endotoxin on Neurobehavioral Functions in Humans > Results > Body temperature and heart rate
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesA result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Both, low-dose and high-dose LPS treatment significantly increased body temperature (Fig. 2A; low-dose: F = 13.18, p<0.001; high-dose: F = 14.11, p<0.001) and heart rate (Fig. 2B; low-dose: F = 10.49, p<0.001, high-dose: F = 9.12, p<0.001) without significant differences between LPS doses.”
§ Dose-Dependent Effects of Endotoxin on Neurobehavioral Functions in Humans > Results > Body temperature and heart rate
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesA result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Self-reported positive mood (low-dose: F = 6.21, p = 0.01; high-dose: F = 25.97, p<0.001), calmness (low-dose: F = 6.42, p<0.01; high-dose: F = 5.52, p<0.01), and alertness (low-dose: F = 5.07, p<0.01; high-dose: F = 7.09, p<0.01), were significantly decreased 3 h after endotoxin injection in both groups.”
§ Dose-Dependent Effects of Endotoxin on Neurobehavioral Functions in Humans > Results > Mood & Anxiety
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesA result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In the low-dose group mood changes were negatively correlated with the changes in plasma cortisol (r = −.739, p<0.005) and saliva cortisol (r = −.652, p<0.01), which was also seen in the high-dose group but failed to reach statistical significance after alpha correction.”
§ Dose-Dependent Effects of Endotoxin on Neurobehavioral Functions in Humans > Results > Correlation analyses
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesA result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The rise of free cortisol in saliva was significantly higher in the high-dose group than in the low-dose group (F = 2.27, p<0.05).”
§ Dose-Dependent Effects of Endotoxin on Neurobehavioral Functions in Humans > Results > Neuroendocrine measures
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passes
- It may state two separate claims as one. 17
- The quote only partly states this claim. 10
- Probably not a substantial claim. 30
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Moreover, ANOVA did not reveal significant treatment×group, emotionality×group, or treatment×emotionality effects, however showed a significant treatment×emotionality×group interaction effect (F = 6.14, p<0.05) indicating a specific effect depending on the quality of memory content and the employed dose of LPS.”
§ Dose-Dependent Effects of Endotoxin on Neurobehavioral Functions in Humans > Results > Memory
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Endotoxin administration induced significant increases in plasma concentrations of the pro-inflammatory cytokines IL-6 (low-dose: F = 31.11, p<0.001, high-dose: F = 17.74, p<0.001) and TNF-α (low-dose: F = 12.05, p<0.001, high-dose: F = 21.26, p<0.001) with most pronounced increases 1.75 h after LPS injection (Fig. 3).”
§ Dose-Dependent Effects of Endotoxin on Neurobehavioral Functions in Humans > Results > Cytokine levels
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesThe quote only partly states this claim.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Endotoxin administration induced significant increases in plasma concentrations of the pro-inflammatory cytokines IL-6 (low-dose: F = 31.11, p<0.001, high-dose: F = 17.74, p<0.001) and TNF-α (low-dose: F = 12.05, p<0.001, high-dose: F = 21.26, p<0.001) with most pronounced increases 1.75 h after LPS injection (Fig. 3).”
§ Dose-Dependent Effects of Endotoxin on Neurobehavioral Functions in Humans > Results > Cytokine levels
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesThe quote only partly states this claim.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In contrast, a higher dose of LPS did not significantly affect memory performance neither for emotional (8.5±1.8 vs. 8.5±1.3) nor for neutral stimuli (5.9±2.0 vs. 6.8±1.7; F = 1.29, p>0.05), although there was a trend towards decreased memory performance for neutral stimuli after high-dose LPS treatment (t = 2.09, p = 0.10).”
§ Dose-Dependent Effects of Endotoxin on Neurobehavioral Functions in Humans > Results > Memory
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✗ Asserted: fails✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The authors may not put it forward as true. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The anti-inflammatory cytokine IL-10 was significantly increased in both endotoxin groups (low-dose: F = 25.47, p<0.001; high-dose: F = 12.80, p<0.001) with significantly more pronounced elevations in the high-dose group 3 h post injection (F = 5.02, p<0.001; Fig. 3C).”
§ Dose-Dependent Effects of Endotoxin on Neurobehavioral Functions in Humans > Results > Cytokine levels
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesThe quote only partly states this claim.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Endotoxin administration induced significant increases in plasma concentrations of the pro-inflammatory cytokines IL-6 (low-dose: F = 31.11, p<0.001, high-dose: F = 17.74, p<0.001) and TNF-α (low-dose: F = 12.05, p<0.001, high-dose: F = 21.26, p<0.001) with most pronounced increases 1.75 h after LPS injection (Fig. 3).”
§ Dose-Dependent Effects of Endotoxin on Neurobehavioral Functions in Humans > Results > Cytokine levels
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✗ Asserted: fails✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The authors may not put it forward as true. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The quote only partly states this claim.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The most pronounced differences in cytokine levels between the two groups were observed for IL-1 receptor antagonist (IL-1ra) (F = 15.59, p<0.001, low-dose vs. high-dose; F = 33.45, p<0.001, high-dose vs. control; F = 21.01, p<.001, low-dose vs. control; Fig. 3D).”
§ Dose-Dependent Effects of Endotoxin on Neurobehavioral Functions in Humans > Results > Cytokine levels
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesThe quote only partly states this claim.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In contrast, a higher dose of LPS did not significantly affect memory performance neither for emotional (8.5±1.8 vs. 8.5±1.3) nor for neutral stimuli (5.9±2.0 vs. 6.8±1.7; F = 1.29, p>0.05), although there was a trend towards decreased memory performance for neutral stimuli after high-dose LPS treatment (t = 2.09, p = 0.10).”
§ Dose-Dependent Effects of Endotoxin on Neurobehavioral Functions in Humans > Results > Memory
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✗ Asserted: fails✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The authors may not put it forward as true. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“We observed significant, mainly dose-dependent, increases in body temperature, heart rate, levels of pro- (IL-6, TNF-α) and anti-inflammatory (IL-10, IL-1ra) cytokines, cortisol, and norepinephrine.”
§ Dose-Dependent Effects of Endotoxin on Neurobehavioral Functions in Humans > Discussion
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Endotoxin administration induced significant increases in plasma concentrations of the pro-inflammatory cytokines IL-6 (low-dose: F = 31.11, p<0.001, high-dose: F = 17.74, p<0.001) and TNF-α (low-dose: F = 12.05, p<0.001, high-dose: F = 21.26, p<0.001) with most pronounced increases 1.75 h after LPS injection (Fig. 3).”
§ Dose-Dependent Effects of Endotoxin on Neurobehavioral Functions in Humans > Results > Cytokine levels
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The quote only partly states this claim.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The anti-inflammatory cytokine IL-10 was significantly increased in both endotoxin groups (low-dose: F = 25.47, p<0.001; high-dose: F = 12.80, p<0.001) with significantly more pronounced elevations in the high-dose group 3 h post injection (F = 5.02, p<0.001; Fig. 3C).”
§ Dose-Dependent Effects of Endotoxin on Neurobehavioral Functions in Humans > Results > Cytokine levels
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesThe quote only partly states this claim.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The most pronounced differences in cytokine levels between the two groups were observed for IL-1 receptor antagonist (IL-1ra) (F = 15.59, p<0.001, low-dose vs. high-dose; F = 33.45, p<0.001, high-dose vs. control; F = 21.01, p<.001, low-dose vs. control; Fig. 3D).”
§ Dose-Dependent Effects of Endotoxin on Neurobehavioral Functions in Humans > Results > Cytokine levels
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesThe quote only partly states this claim.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“We also observed a pronounced and dose-dependent impact of LPS on self-reported mood with increased anxiety levels and impaired calmness and alertness.”
§ Dose-Dependent Effects of Endotoxin on Neurobehavioral Functions in Humans > Discussion
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“State anxiety significantly increased after endotoxin administration in both groups (low-dose: F = 4.13, p<0.05; high-dose: F = 6.47, p<0.01).”
§ Dose-Dependent Effects of Endotoxin on Neurobehavioral Functions in Humans > Results > Mood & Anxiety
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesThe quote only partly states this claim.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The data in the current study show an association between cortisol and mood parameters at a lower grade of inflammation in contrast to a more pronounced inflammatory effect where mood parameters are predominantly associated to IL-6 levels.”
§ Dose-Dependent Effects of Endotoxin on Neurobehavioral Functions in Humans > Discussion
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“The n-back task is a common and well-established continuous performance test for measurements of working memory performance [33], [34].”
§ Dose-Dependent Effects of Endotoxin on Neurobehavioral Functions in Humans > Materials and Methods > Memory tests
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [33] WK Kirchner, 1958, Age differences in short-term retention of rapidly changing information., J Exp Psychol source
- Not checked yetcites [34] AM Owen, 2005, N-back working memory paradigm: a meta-analysis of normative functional neuroimaging studies., Human Brain Mapping source
Strength:boosted· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“The multidimensional mood questionnaire (Multidimensionaler Befindlichkeitsfragebogen, MDBF), which is a well-established and -validated scale in German language.”
§ Dose-Dependent Effects of Endotoxin on Neurobehavioral Functions in Humans > Materials and Methods > Mood and Anxiety Questionnaires
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [29] V Pollock, 1979, Profile of Mood States: the factors and their physiological correlates., J Nerv Ment Dis source
- Not checked yetcites [30] R Steyer, 1997, Der Mehrdimensionale Befindlichkeitsfragebogen (MDBF)
Strength:boosted· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The alpha level was adjusted according to the respective number of comparisons (Bonferroni correction).”
§ Dose-Dependent Effects of Endotoxin on Neurobehavioral Functions in Humans > Materials and Methods > Statistics
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Behavioral changes induced by immune activation include symptoms such as psychomotor slowing, social withdrawal, anhedonia, depressed mood, and disturbed sleep architecture, collectively termed “sickness behavior” [4], [5], [6].”
§ Dose-Dependent Effects of Endotoxin on Neurobehavioral Functions in Humans > Introduction
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [4] R Dantzer, 2001, Cytokine-induced sickness behavior: where do we stand?, Brain, Behavior, and Immunity source
- Not checked yetcites [5] J Mullington, 2000, Dose-dependent effects of endotoxin on human sleep., American Journal of Physiology - Regulatory, Integrative and Comperative Physiology source
- Not checked yetcites [6] AV Turnbull, 1995, Regulation of the HPA axis by cytokines., Brain, Behavior, and Immunity source
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In this placebo-controlled, double-blind, crossover study, participants were randomly allocated to two different groups:”
§ Dose-Dependent Effects of Endotoxin on Neurobehavioral Functions in Humans > Materials and Methods > Experimental design
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In this placebo-controlled, double-blind, crossover study, participants were randomly allocated to two different groups:”
§ Dose-Dependent Effects of Endotoxin on Neurobehavioral Functions in Humans > Materials and Methods > Experimental design
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The quote only partly states this claim.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The groups did not differ in age, years of education or body weight, nor in any of the physical or psychological screening parameters, and there was no detectable influence of these parameters on any of the outcome measures.”
§ Dose-Dependent Effects of Endotoxin on Neurobehavioral Functions in Humans > Materials and Methods > Subjects
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“The State Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI, state version), a widely used scale to quantify anxiety in health research [31], [32].”
§ Dose-Dependent Effects of Endotoxin on Neurobehavioral Functions in Humans > Materials and Methods > Mood and Anxiety Questionnaires
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [31] P Keedwell, 1996, What do anxiety scales measure?, Acta Psychiatr Scand source
- Not checked yetcites [32] CD Spielberger, 1983, Manual for the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (Form Y)
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Subjects and investigators where blinded with respect to the study condition.”
§ Dose-Dependent Effects of Endotoxin on Neurobehavioral Functions in Humans > Materials and Methods > Subjects
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“Whereas 50% of pictures had neutral contents and were reported to elicit medium levels of valence and low levels of arousal, 50% of pictures consisted of highly emotional pictures known to elicit high arousal and low valence values [35].”
§ Dose-Dependent Effects of Endotoxin on Neurobehavioral Functions in Humans > Materials and Methods > Memory tests
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [35] PJ Lang, 1999, International affective picture system (IAPS): Technical manual and affective ratings
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“These conflicting results might be either due to the different experimentally induced grades of inflammation or the neuropsychological tools (Digit Span Forward, Backward Test by Wechsler) employed in these studies to assess working memory performance.”
§ Dose-Dependent Effects of Endotoxin on Neurobehavioral Functions in Humans > Discussion
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“The alterations in cytokines and cortisol levels observed in this study resemble those reported in other studies employing comparable amounts (0.4 ng/kg) of intravenously administered LPS [36].”
§ Dose-Dependent Effects of Endotoxin on Neurobehavioral Functions in Humans > Discussion
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [36] M Bahador, 2007, From therapy to experimental model: a hundred years of endotoxin administration to human subjects., Journal of Endotoxin Research source
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“These data suggest the existence of at least two counter-acting mechanisms, one promoting and one inhibiting cognitive performance during acute systemic inflammation.”
§ Dose-Dependent Effects of Endotoxin on Neurobehavioral Functions in Humans > Abstract
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Studies in experimental animals together with clinical observations in humans suggest a cytokine-mediated modulation of memory functions as a consequence of acute peripheral inflammatory processes [3], [37].”
§ Dose-Dependent Effects of Endotoxin on Neurobehavioral Functions in Humans > Discussion
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [3] R Yirmiya, 2011, Immune modulation of learning, memory, neural plasticity and neurogenesis., Brain Behav Immun source
- Not checked yetcites [37] JS Kullmann, 2011, Effects of an Acute Inflammation on Memory Performance, Mood and Brain Activity., Zeitschrift für Medizinische Psychologie source
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:conditional· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Associations between circulating IL-6 levels and negative mood have been reported previously [28], [62] and IL-6 frequently has been discussed as a potential modulator of mood during sickness behavior and even depression and other neuropsychological diseases [2], [3], [9].”
§ Dose-Dependent Effects of Endotoxin on Neurobehavioral Functions in Humans > Discussion
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [28] A Reichenberg, 2001, Cytokine-associated emotional and cognitive disturbances in humans., Archives of General Psychiatry source
- Not checked yetcites [62] CE Wright, 2005, Acute inflammation and negative mood: mediation by cytokine activation., Brain, Behavior, and Immunity source
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In addition, greater effects on mood and anxiety than after low-dose stimulation, together with reduced reaction time in the working memory test also might indicate an elevated stress reaction and an “alarmed state” of the organism probably going along with increased attention.”
§ Dose-Dependent Effects of Endotoxin on Neurobehavioral Functions in Humans > Discussion
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:conditional· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Associations between circulating IL-6 levels and negative mood have been reported previously [28], [62] and IL-6 frequently has been discussed as a potential modulator of mood during sickness behavior and even depression and other neuropsychological diseases [2], [3], [9].”
§ Dose-Dependent Effects of Endotoxin on Neurobehavioral Functions in Humans > Discussion
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [2] N DellaGioia, 2010, A critical review of human endotoxin administration as an experimental paradigm of depression., Neurosci Biobehav Rev source
- Not checked yetcites [3] R Yirmiya, 2011, Immune modulation of learning, memory, neural plasticity and neurogenesis., Brain Behav Immun source
- Not checked yetcites [9] RC Drexhage, 2010, The mononuclear phagocyte system and its cytokine inflammatory networks in schizophrenia and bipolar disorder., Expert Review of Neurotherapeutics source
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:conditional· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The abrogation of this impairment in the high-dose LPS group might either reflect a balanced state between cytokine induced increased neural excitability and the counter-acting regulatory mechanisms, or might be due to increased stress exposure:”
§ Dose-Dependent Effects of Endotoxin on Neurobehavioral Functions in Humans > Discussion
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:conditional· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“These authors suggest that slow genomic effects of cortisol enhance PFC functioning [48].”
§ Dose-Dependent Effects of Endotoxin on Neurobehavioral Functions in Humans > Discussion
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [48] MJ Henckens, 2011, Time-dependent corticosteroid modulation of prefrontal working memory processing., Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America source
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✗ Asserted: fails✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The authors may not put it forward as true. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“Of interest for the current experiments is a recent functional magnetic resonance (fMRI) study reporting that several hours after cortisol intake DLPFC activity during an n-back task was enhanced with a similar trend being observed at the behavioral level.”
§ Dose-Dependent Effects of Endotoxin on Neurobehavioral Functions in Humans > Discussion
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [48] MJ Henckens, 2011, Time-dependent corticosteroid modulation of prefrontal working memory processing., Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America source
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“This hypothesis is supported by recent work in rodents, which demonstrated enhanced neural activity in the amygdala after peripheral LPS-administration [59], [60].”
§ Dose-Dependent Effects of Endotoxin on Neurobehavioral Functions in Humans > Discussion
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [59] R Doenlen, 2011, Electrical activity in rat cortico-limbic structures after single or repeated administration of lipopolysaccharide or staphylococcal enterotoxin B., Proceedings: Biological sciences, The Royal Society
- Not checked yetcites [60] H Engler, 2011, Acute amygdaloid response to systemic inflammation., Brain, Behavior and Immunity source
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“In humans experimental or pharmacological stress studies have reported inconsistent effects with impairments as well as enhancements being reported [42], [46], [47].”
§ Dose-Dependent Effects of Endotoxin on Neurobehavioral Functions in Humans > Discussion
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [42] D Schoofs, 2008, Psychosocial stress induces working memory impairments in an n-back paradigm., Psychoneuroendocrinology source
- Not checked yetcites [46] S Cornelisse, 2011, Implications of psychosocial stress on memory formation in a typical male versus female student sample., Psychoneuroendocrinology source
- Not checked yetcites [47] D Schoofs, 2009, Cold pressor stress impairs performance on working memory tasks requiring executive functions in healthy young men., Behavioral Neuroscience source
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Animal data suggest detrimental effects of acute systemic inflammation on long term memory [3], [19], [21], 22,23.”
§ Dose-Dependent Effects of Endotoxin on Neurobehavioral Functions in Humans > Discussion
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [3] R Yirmiya, 2011, Immune modulation of learning, memory, neural plasticity and neurogenesis., Brain Behav Immun source
- Not checked yetcites [19] M Gibertini, 1995, Legionella pneumophila-induced visual learning impairment reversed by anti-interleukin-1 beta., Proc Soc Exp Biol Med source
- Not checked yetcites [21] CR Pugh, 1998, Selective effects of peripheral lipopolysaccharide administration on contextual and auditory-cue fear conditioning., Brain, Behavior, and Immunity source
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:conditional· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“Studies in rodents and monkeys have established that acute stress rapidly impairs dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) functioning via noradrenergic and dopaminergic mechanisms [44].”
§ Dose-Dependent Effects of Endotoxin on Neurobehavioral Functions in Humans > Discussion
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [44] AF Arnsten, 2009, Stress signalling pathways that impair prefrontal cortex structure and function., Nature Reviews Neuroscience source
Strength:boosted· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Behavioral and pharmacological studies in humans showed enhanced long-term memory consolidation for emotional stimuli after stress or glucocorticoid (GC) treatment directly before or after encoding, while impairing the consolidation of neutral material [56], [57], [58].”
§ Dose-Dependent Effects of Endotoxin on Neurobehavioral Functions in Humans > Discussion
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [56] L Cahill, 2003, Enhanced human memory consolidation with post-learning stress: interaction with the degree of arousal at encoding., Learning and Memory source
- Not checked yetcites [57] S Kuhlmann, 2006, Arousal and cortisol interact in modulating memory consolidation in healthy young men., Behav Neurosci source
- Not checked yetcites [58] JD Payne, 2007, Stress administered prior to encoding impairs neutral but enhances emotional long-term episodic memories., Learning and Memory source
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“In line with this conclusion are recent findings in rodents showing that acute stress enhanced working memory via an enhancement of glutamatergic neurotransmission [49].”
§ Dose-Dependent Effects of Endotoxin on Neurobehavioral Functions in Humans > Discussion
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [49] EY Yuen, 2009, Acute stress enhances glutamatergic transmission in prefrontal cortex and facilitates working memory., Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America source
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“However, administration of 0.8 ng/kg LPS significantly improved the reaction time, possibly indicating a positive effect of the peripheral inflammation on alertness and response speed rather than on memory performance.”
§ Dose-Dependent Effects of Endotoxin on Neurobehavioral Functions in Humans > Discussion
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“This study demonstrates that sub-septic systemic inflammation in humans along with the release of pro- and anti-inflammatory cytokines does dose-dependently affect neurobehavioral functions in humans reflecting an adaptive response as a consequence of a refined immune-to-brain communication.”
§ Dose-Dependent Effects of Endotoxin on Neurobehavioral Functions in Humans > Discussion
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
- Rests on an assumption: The human endotoxemia model with LPS in healthy subjects is a valid model for studying neurobehavioral effects of systemic inflammation.
In the paper
“However this effect appears to be rather short lived [45].”
§ Dose-Dependent Effects of Endotoxin on Neurobehavioral Functions in Humans > Discussion
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [45] DM Diamond, 2007, The temporal dynamics model of emotional memory processing: a synthesis on the neurobiological basis of stress-induced amnesia, flashbulb and traumatic memories, and the Yerkes-Dodson law., Neural Plasticity source
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“Although the reasons for this discrepancy remain unclear, it underlines the basic independency of these two processes and might fortify the view on sickness behavior as an adaptive response rather than a simple impairment by the inflammatory challenge [4].”
§ Dose-Dependent Effects of Endotoxin on Neurobehavioral Functions in Humans > Discussion
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [4] R Dantzer, 2001, Cytokine-induced sickness behavior: where do we stand?, Brain, Behavior, and Immunity source
Load-bearingStrength:hedged· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“A possible explanation for this phenomenon was given by Yirmiya and Goshen, who proposed a model of adaptive down-regulation of neural excitability to prevent potentially dangerous hyper-excitability and proneness to errors by the “price” of impairments of learning and memory [3].”
§ Dose-Dependent Effects of Endotoxin on Neurobehavioral Functions in Humans > Discussion
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [3] R Yirmiya, 2011, Immune modulation of learning, memory, neural plasticity and neurogenesis., Brain Behav Immun source
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“HPA system activation with increased levels of cortisol and corticotropin releasing hormone have also been suggested to play a role in depressive symptoms and in mediating inflammatory effects on mood and anxiety [6], [28], [37], [63].”
§ Dose-Dependent Effects of Endotoxin on Neurobehavioral Functions in Humans > Discussion
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [6] AV Turnbull, 1995, Regulation of the HPA axis by cytokines., Brain, Behavior, and Immunity source
- Not checked yetcites [28] A Reichenberg, 2001, Cytokine-associated emotional and cognitive disturbances in humans., Archives of General Psychiatry source
- Not checked yetcites [37] JS Kullmann, 2011, Effects of an Acute Inflammation on Memory Performance, Mood and Brain Activity., Zeitschrift für Medizinische Psychologie source
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:conditional· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
The paper relies on this without support.
Data on dose-dependent effects of LPS-induced inflammation on neural responses are completely lacking.
“Since data on dose dependent effects of LPS-induced inflammation on neural responses are completely lacking, one can only hypothesize about the underlying neurobiological mechanisms responsible for these differential effects.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Two classes of soluble factors (cytokines and stress hormones) are most often discussed to modulate cognitive functions during an inflammatory reaction.
“Two classes of soluble factors are most often discussed to modulate cognitive functions during an inflammatory reaction: cytokines and stress hormones.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The human endotoxemia model with LPS in healthy subjects is a valid model for studying neurobehavioral effects of systemic inflammation.
“We employed a human endotoxemia model in healthy subjects and analyzed the effects on circulating cytokines, neuroendocrine parameters as well as mood and memory performance by either administering lower (0.4 ng/kg) or higher (0.8 ng/kg) doses of LPS.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Correlations between cytokine or cortisol levels and mood reflect causal mediation.
“Our results confirm earlier observations which suggested both circulating cytokines as well as cortisol to be involved in mediating the effects on emotions [28].”
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Endotoxin results in a robust but short-term inflammatory response that ranges from 40 to 190 pg/mL (up to a 38000% increase) two hours after injection depending on the bacterial strain and dose (Andreasen et al., 2008; Grigoleit et al., 2011).”
From The role of inflammation in core features of depression: Insights from paradigms using exogenously-induced inflammation. (2018) · cites this paper as Grigoleit et al., 2011
In the citing paper
“Additionally, the effects of endotoxin on mood and anxiety appear to manifest in a dose-dependent manner, with higher doses associated with degradations in mood and increases in anxiety (Grigoleit et al., 2011).”
From The role of inflammation in core features of depression: Insights from paradigms using exogenously-induced inflammation. (2018) · cites this paper as Grigoleit et al., 2011
In the citing paper
“there was no significant effect of low-dose endotoxin on n-back task performance”
From The role of inflammation in core features of depression: Insights from paradigms using exogenously-induced inflammation. (2018) · cites this paper as Grigoleit et al., 2011
In the citing paper
“the only published study examining the role of inflammation in performance on behavioral tasks of updating found that moderate inflammation facilitated (rather than slowed) updating speed (Grigoleit et al., 2011)”
From The role of inflammation in core features of depression: Insights from paradigms using exogenously-induced inflammation. (2018) · cites this paper as Grigoleit et al., 2011
In the citing paper
“This stress response was associated with increased anxiety and depressed mood.”
From Signalling cognition: The gut microbiota and hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis (2023) · cites this paper as [371]
In the citing paper
“In healthy adults, the experimental administration of LPS in a randomized control trial (RCT) caused a transient physiological stress response, with dose-related increases in cortisol, noradrenaline, body temperature, pulse rate, and cytokines (371).”
From Signalling cognition: The gut microbiota and hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis (2023) · cites this paper as [371]
In the citing paper
“Alterations in cognition occurred both in the short- and long-term, confirming mechanisms for both the promotion and inhibition of cognitive performance during acute inflammatory stress.”
From Signalling cognition: The gut microbiota and hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis (2023) · cites this paper as [371]
In the citing paper
“Parenteral administration of LPS to humans in nanogram quantities (0.4 ng/kg body weight) increases plasma concentration of pro-inflammatory cytokines IL-6 and TNFa and the anti-inflammatory cytokines IL-10 and IL-1 receptor antagonist, along with salivary and plasma cortisol and plasma norepinephrine.”
From The Gut Microbiome and the Brain (2014) · cites this paper as [27]
In the citing paper
“These changes are accompanied by depressed mood, increased anxiety, and impaired long-term memory for emotional stimuli.27”
From The Gut Microbiome and the Brain (2014) · cites this paper as [27]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.
Treatment is classified as a between-subjects factor in a crossover study
MinorThe statistical methods classify LPS versus placebo as a between-subjects factor, but the study design says every participant received both treatments. Treatment is therefore a within-subject factor in the described design.
“‘treatment’ as between-subjects factor (LPS/placebo)”
“Every participant received the higher or lower dose of LPS during one and saline during the other test session in a balanced, randomized manner.”
Stimulus emotionality is classified as a between-subjects factor
MinorThe long-term memory analysis calls stimulus quality a between-subjects factor, although each subject was tested with both emotional and neutral pictures.
“treatment and stimulus-quality (emotionality) as between-subject factors”
“24 h after the administration of LPS or placebo, respectively, participants were presented a second sequence of 40 pictures containing 20 of those they were presented the day before and 20 new ones of similar content, again with 50% of emotional and 50% of neutral content, respectively.”
Citations
Cites
(1970) · Cited by 24,983
Polazzi, E., Mengoni, I., Caprini, M., Peña‐Altamira, E., Kurtys, E., & Monti, B. (2012) · Neurosignals · doi:10.1159/000337115 · Cited by 9,023
Glutamate neurotoxicity and diseases of the nervous system
Choi, D. W. (1988) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/0896-6273(88)90162-6 · Cited by 8,184
Inflammation and Its Discontents: The Role of Cytokines in the Pathophysiology of Major Depression
Miller, A. H., Maletic, V., & Raison, C. L. (2009) · Biological Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/j.biopsych.2008.11.029 · Cited by 3,848
Tracey, K. J. (2002) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature01321 · Cited by 3,728
N-back working memory paradigm: a meta-analysis of normative functional neuroimaging studies.
Owen, A. M., McMillan, K. M., Laird, A. R., & Bullmore, E. (2005) · Human Brain Mapping · doi:10.1002/hbm.20131 · Cited by 3,560
Stress signalling pathways that impair prefrontal cortex structure and function
Arnsten, A. F. T. (2009) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn2648 · Cited by 3,299
Cytokines sing the blues: inflammation and the pathogenesis of depression
Raison, C. L., Capuron, L., & Miller, A. H. (2006) · Trends in Immunology · doi:10.1016/j.it.2005.11.006 · Cited by 3,009
International Affective Picture System (IAPS) : Technical Manual and Affective Ratings
Lang, P. J. (1995) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 2,870
Cognitive neuroscience of emotional memory
LaBar, K. S., & Cabeza, R. (2006) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn1825 · Cited by 1,834 · cited 1×
“Under placebo conditions, we observed improved memory performance for emotionally arousing compared to neutral stimuli, confirming earlier observations [50].”
Result
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 201–241 of 241
Karley, D., Nayak, K. K., & Kolla, V. (2024) · CRC Press eBooks · doi:10.1201/9781003160663-17 · Cited by 1
Uric Acid: A Biomarker and Pathogenic Factor of Affective Disorders and Neurodegenerative Diseases
Chu, T., Liu, G., Liu, J., Wu, Y., & Fang, W. (2024) · Current Pharmaceutical Design · doi:10.2174/0113816128333916241003180018 · Cited by 1
Between care and contagion: Insights from the endotoxin model into the social facets of sickness
Flasbeck, V., Engler, H., Marková, V., Schedlowski, M., & Brüne, M. (2025) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2025.106486 · Cited by 1
Self-citationBerlot, R., Asan, L., Nicholson, T. R., Stanton, B. R., Pollak, T. A., & Edwards, M. J. (2025) · European Journal of Neurology · doi:10.1111/ene.70459 · Cited by 1
Inflammatory models of depression in rodents and humans
Markov, D., Zozulya, S. A., & Dolotov, O. V. (2026) · Frontiers in Psychiatry · doi:10.3389/fpsyt.2026.1687579 · Cited by 5
Yirmiya, D., Rimmerman, N., & Reshef, R. (2015) · Cited by 1
Le microbiote intestinal gouverne-t-il notre cerveau ?
Fond, G. B. (2018) · Annales Médico-psychologiques revue psychiatrique · doi:10.1016/j.amp.2018.08.017 · Cited by 1
Danka, M. N., Steptoe, A., & Iob, E. (2025) · Psychoneuroendocrinology · doi:10.1101/2024.04.14.24305797 · Cited by 1
Cognotoxemia: endotoxemia and gender predict changes in working memory performance in healthy adults
McDonnell, S., Graham‐Engeland, J. E., Sliwinski, M. J., Engeland, C. G., & Knight, E. L. (2024) · Frontiers in Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnins.2024.1453325 · Cited by 1
The Effect of Female Pheromone on the Functional State of Young Men
Литвинова, Н. А., Владимировна, Б. А., & Юрьевна, З. К. (2019) · Бюллетень Восточно-Сибирского научного центра Сибирского отделения Российской академии медицинских наук · doi:10.29413/abs.2019-4.1.8 · Cited by 1
Role of Interferon-Gamma and Leucine-Rich Repeat Kinase 2 in Stress-Related Pathology
Litteljohn, D. (2016) · Carleton University's Institutional Repository (MacOdrum Library, Carleton University) · doi:10.22215/etd/2016-11660
Pathophysiologie von Enzephalopathien
Hansen, H.-C. (2013) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-36915-5_8
Ritz, N. L. (2014) · UNM’s Digital Repository (University of New Mexico)
Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews
Poon, D. C.-H., Ho, J. Y. S., Chiu, K., & Chang, R. C. (2013)
Metabolic-Inflammation Aspects of Depression and Cardiovascular Disease
Rosenblat, J. D., Kakar, R., & McIntyre, R. S. (2016) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-32480-7_14
Physical health and metabolic dysfunction in bipolar disorder
Rosenblat, J. D., Cha, D. S., Mansur, R. B., & McIntyre, R. S. (2016) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9781107477278.021
Fond, G. B., Boukouaci, W., Chevalier, G., Regnault, A., Eberl, G., Hamdani, N., Dickerson, F., Macgregor, A., Boyer, L., Dargél, A., et al. (2014)
Inflammation and subjective health : the role of sickness behaviour
Lodin, K. (2018) · Figshare
Qi, C., Ma, X. Z., Chen, H. C., Wang, Q. J., Gao, L., Yin, J., & Jing, Y. (2018) · Neuropsychiatry · doi:10.4172/neuropsychiatry.1000376
Translational behavioral research using common marmosets in the psychiatric field
Enomoto, T., & Ikeda, K. (2019) · Folia Pharmacologica Japonica · doi:10.1254/fpj.153.28
Unique Neurophysiological Vulnerability of Visual Attention Networks to Acute InflammationPreprint
Balter, L. J. T., Bosch, J. A., Aldred, S., Drayson, M. T., Zanten, J. V., Higgs, S., Raymond, J. E., & Mazaheri, A. (2019) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/599159
The Microbiome and Brain Health
Norling, S. L. (2020) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-30730-1_25
Chemokines as Potential Biomarkers for PTSD in Military Population
Zhang, L., Hu, X., Li, X., & Ursano, R. J. (2021) · IntechOpen eBooks · doi:10.5772/intechopen.96133
Lin, P., Li, Q., Shi, Y., Li, D., Guo, X., Dong, K., Chen, Q., Lou, X., Li, Z., Li, P., et al. (2021) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.3912535
Filho, A. C., Lós, D. B., Soares, M. V.-R., Jucá, P. M., de Queiroz, T., da Silva, F. E. R., Saraiva, K., Silva, A. D. A., Azul, F. V. C. S., Leal, L. K. A. M., et al. (2022) · Research Square · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-1671211/v1
Nunes, F. D. D. (2022) · Digital Library of Theses and Dissertations (Universidade de São Paulo) · doi:10.11606/t.22.2022.tde-18082022-102408
Filho, A. J. M. C., Lós, D. B., Soares, M. L., Jucá, P. M., de Queiroz, T., Rodrigues, F. E., Saraiva, K., Silva, A. K., Azul, F. V. C. S., Leal, L. K. A. M., et al. (2022) · Research Square · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-1671211/v2
赵, 君. (2022) · Advances in Clinical Medicine · doi:10.12677/acm.2022.12121607
Altering the Gut Microbiome for Cognitive Benefit
Wright, G. M., Huynh, K., Schneider, M., & Gareau, M. G. (2024) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-323-99971-7.00011-4
Associaçao entre microbiota intestinal e transtorno depressivo maior: uma revisão da literatura
Bochi, G. V., & Quincozes, J. A. V. (2021) · Revista Ciência & Humanização do Hospital de Clínicas de Passo Fundo · doi:10.29327/2185320.1.2-10
Schrock, J. M., Sugiyama, L. S., & Snodgrass, J. J. (2024) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780197544754.013.12 · Cited by 1
Tomé-Fernández, M., Berbegal-Bernabeu, M., Sánchez‐SanSegundo, M., Hurtado-Sánchez, J. A., Tuells, J., & Zaragoza-Martí, A. (2025) · Anales del Sistema Sanitario de Navarra · doi:10.23938/assn.1113 · Cited by 1
Khan, A., Ronan, P. J., & Rahman, S. (2025) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.5229259
Hussein, W., Alshammari, M. D., Alheibshy, F., Alsadiq, A. A., Almubalea, R. S., Alanazi, F. K., & Almarshdi, M. F. (2025) · Asian Journal of Pharmaceutical Research and Health Care · doi:10.4103/ajprhc.ajprhc_138_25
Value-based cognitive control moderates the relation of inflammation with depression in adolescents
Yuan, J. P., Miller, J. G., Joachimsthaler, J., Uy, J. P., Ho, T. C., & Gotlib, I. H. (2025) · Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience · doi:10.1093/scan/nsaf121
Mutovina, A., Sapronova, A., Ayriyants, K. A., Ryabushkina, Y. A., Khantakova, J. N., Mezhevalova, P., Ritter, P., & Bondar, N. P. (2025) · International Journal of Molecular Sciences · doi:10.3390/ijms262412007
Cefepime Alleviates Comorbid Pain and Depression Induced by Lipopolysaccharide in Female Mice
Khan, A., Ronan, P. J., & Rahman, S. (2026) · Brain Sciences · doi:10.3390/brainsci16030306
Exposition aux endotoxines : influence de l'alimentation et rôle dans le vieillissement cognitif
André, P. (2020) · theses.fr (ABES) · doi:10.70675/ea1360c2zd962z46f5zaabfzcbc15c0efc25
Zandasrar, F., & Alimohammadi, S. (2026) · International Journal of Peptide Research and Therapeutics · doi:10.1007/s10989-026-10824-4
Saillart, E., Jacobs, K., Claes, S. J., & Vergaelen, E. (2026) · Brain Behavior & Immunity - Health · doi:10.1016/j.bbih.2026.101334
Pathophysiologie von Enzephalopathien
Hansen, H. C. (2026) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-662-72532-0_8
Metadata
- Authors
- Grigoleit, J.-S., Kullmann, J. S., Wolf, O. T., Hammes, F., Wegner, A., Jablonowski, S., Engler, H., Gizewski, E., Oberbeck, R., & Schedlowski, M.
- Affiliations
- University of Duisburg-Essen (DE)
- Essen University Hospital (DE)
- Ruhr University Bochum (DE)
- Corresponding author
- Schedlowski, Manfred
- Venue
- PLoS ONE
- Publisher
- Public Library of Science (PLoS)
- Published
- 2011-12-02
- Volume
- 6
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- e28330
- ISSN
- 1932-6203 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC3229570
- OpenAlex
- W1964505086
- Semantic Scholar
- 5d51a0d850bd026e5fc5937456b7b1ad6e711819
- Cited by
- 241
- References
- 65
- Citations by year
- 2026: 8 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 21 · 2019: 23 · 2018: 21 · 2017: 19 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 23 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 15 · 2012: 7
- FWCI
- 3.06
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Locations
- PLoS ONE (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Funders
- United States Pharmacopeia
- Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (/14-1)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Biological Psychiatry › Tryptophan and brain disorders
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Behavioral Neuroscience › Stress Responses and Cortisol
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms
- Keywords
- endotoxin, lipopolysaccharide, acute systemic inflammation, dose-response relationship, working memory, long-term memory, emotional memory, anxiety, mood, cytokines, interleukin-6, cortisol, norepinephrine, neurobehavioral effects
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Attention, Behavior, Body Temperature, Body Weight, Dose-Response Relationship, Drug, Double-Blind Method, Endotoxins, Heart Rate, Humans, Inflammation, Lipopolysaccharides, Male, Memory, Models, Neurological, Placebos, Tumor Necrosis Factor-alpha, Interleukin-6, Body Mass Index, Interleukin-10, Cross-Over Studies, Interleukin 1 Receptor Antagonist Protein
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-10-06, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).
A second model labelled each claim on 2026-10-06 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review