Cited by 241Tryptophan and brain disordersStress Responses and CortisolNeuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 65 of the 65 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; none of the 77 sources its claims cite is checked for support yet.

Dose-Dependent Effects of Endotoxin on Neurobehavioral Functions in Humans

Open access

Abstract

Clinical and experimental evidence document that inflammation and increased peripheral cytokine levels are associated with depression-like symptoms and neuropsychological disturbances in humans. However, it remains unclear whether and to what extent cognitive functions like memory and attention are affected by and related to the dose of the inflammatory stimulus. Thus, in a cross-over, double-blind, experimental approach, healthy male volunteers were administered with either placebo or bacterial lipopolysaccharide (LPS) at doses of 0.4 (n = 18) or 0.8 ng/kg of body weight (n = 16). Pro- and anti-inflammatory cytokines, norephinephrine and cortisol concentrations were analyzed before and 1, 1.75, 3, 4, 6, and 24 h after injection. In addition, changes in mood and anxiety levels were determined together with working memory (n-back task) and long term memory performance (recall of emotional and neutral pictures of the International Affective Picture System). Endotoxin administration caused a profound transient physiological response with dose-related elevations in body temperature and heart rate, increases in plasma interleukin (IL)-6, IL-10, tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α and IL-1 receptor antagonist (IL-1ra), salivary and plasma cortisol, and plasma norepinephrine. These changes were accompanied by dose-related decreased mood and increased anxiety levels. LPS administration did not affect accuracy in working memory performance but improved reaction time in the high-dose LPS condition compared to the control conditon. In contrast, long-term memory performance was impaired selectively for emotional stimuli after administration of the lower but not of the higher dose of LPS. These data suggest the existence of at least two counter-acting mechanisms, one promoting and one inhibiting cognitive performance during acute systemic inflammation.

Overview

AI snapshot

Written from the paper’s full text.

TL;DR

In a double-blind, crossover human endotoxemia study, LPS at 0.4 or 0.8 ng/kg induced transient inflammatory, neuroendocrine, and mood/anxiety changes in healthy men. Working memory accuracy was unaffected while high-dose LPS improved reaction time, and low-dose LPS selectively impaired long-term memory for emotional pictures.

Key findings

  • Endotoxin increased body temperature and heart rate in both dose groups without significant differences between doses, and increased plasma IL-6, TNF-α, IL-10, IL-1ra, plasma/salivary cortisol, and norepinephrine; TNF-α, IL-10, and IL-1ra showed dose-related differences, while IL-6 did not.
  • Positive mood, calmness, and alertness decreased 3 h after endotoxin in both groups, and state anxiety increased; the positive-mood decrease was larger in the high-dose group (−6.00 vs. −2.06 at 3 h).
  • Working memory accuracy was unaffected (F = 0.20, p > 0.05; low-dose: 15.9 ± 5.4 vs. 15.2 ± 5.0), but reaction time improved by 27.6 ms in the high-dose group (504.9 ± 71.5 ms vs. 532.5 ± 59.3 ms; t = 3.21, p < 0.01).
  • Long-term memory for emotional stimuli was impaired after low-dose LPS (6.4 ± 2.4 vs. 7.8 ± 2.4; t = 2.88, p < 0.05) but not after high-dose LPS (8.5 ± 1.8 vs. 8.5 ± 1.3); neutral memory was not significantly affected in either group, with a trend toward impairment after high-dose LPS (5.9 ± 2.0 vs. 6.8 ± 1.7; t = 2.09, p = 0.10).

Methods

  • Placebo-controlled, double-blind, crossover study in 34 healthy male volunteers randomized to low-dose LPS (0.4 ng/kg, n = 18) or high-dose LPS (0.8 ng/kg, n = 16); each participant received LPS and saline on separate days 10–14 days apart.
  • Blood and saliva were sampled before and 1, 1.75, 3, 4, 6, and 24 h after injection; cytokines were measured by multiplex bead-based assays, and cortisol/norepinephrine by ELISA. Mood/anxiety were assessed with MDBF and STAI at baseline, 3 h, and 6 h; working memory used a 2-back task, and long-term memory used IAPS picture acquisition before 3 h and recall 24 h later.
  • Analyses used repeated-measures ANOVA with Bonferroni post hoc tests, paired/unpaired t-tests, and Pearson correlations with Bonferroni correction; p < 0.05 was considered significant.

Limitations

  • Stated: the exact nature of possible compensatory mechanisms and whether the compensatory effect on memory performance is paralleled by or due to increased attention need future studies; effects on consolidation and retrieval remain unknown.
  • Evident: the sample was restricted to healthy young male volunteers (n = 34; age ranges 19–33 years), so findings may not generalize to women, older adults, or clinical populations.
  • Evident: mechanistic interpretations rely on peripheral cytokine, hormone, and behavioral measures without direct neural measures in this study.

Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1371/journal.pone.0028330

Cites

65 of 65 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

0 of 77 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged

Show all 75 claims

  • It may state two separate claims as one. 17
  • The quote only partly states this claim. 10
  • Probably not a substantial claim. 30
47 of 47
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Data on dose-dependent effects of LPS-induced inflammation on neural responses are completely lacking.

    “Since data on dose dependent effects of LPS-induced inflammation on neural responses are completely lacking, one can only hypothesize about the underlying neurobiological mechanisms responsible for these differential effects.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Two classes of soluble factors (cytokines and stress hormones) are most often discussed to modulate cognitive functions during an inflammatory reaction.

    “Two classes of soluble factors are most often discussed to modulate cognitive functions during an inflammatory reaction: cytokines and stress hormones.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The human endotoxemia model with LPS in healthy subjects is a valid model for studying neurobehavioral effects of systemic inflammation.

    “We employed a human endotoxemia model in healthy subjects and analyzed the effects on circulating cytokines, neuroendocrine parameters as well as mood and memory performance by either administering lower (0.4 ng/kg) or higher (0.8 ng/kg) doses of LPS.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Correlations between cytokine or cortisol levels and mood reflect causal mediation.

    “Our results confirm earlier observations which suggested both circulating cytokines as well as cortisol to be involved in mediating the effects on emotions [28].”
4 of 4

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.

  • Treatment is classified as a between-subjects factor in a crossover study

    Minor

    The statistical methods classify LPS versus placebo as a between-subjects factor, but the study design says every participant received both treatments. Treatment is therefore a within-subject factor in the described design.

  • Stimulus emotionality is classified as a between-subjects factor

    Minor

    The long-term memory analysis calls stimulus quality a between-subjects factor, although each subject was tested with both emotional and neutral pictures.

2 of 2

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 65 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 201–241 of 241

Metadata

Authors
Grigoleit, J.-S., Kullmann, J. S., Wolf, O. T., Hammes, F., Wegner, A., Jablonowski, S., Engler, H., Gizewski, E., Oberbeck, R., & Schedlowski, M.
Affiliations
  • University of Duisburg-Essen (DE)
  • Essen University Hospital (DE)
  • Ruhr University Bochum (DE)
Corresponding author
Schedlowski, Manfred
Venue
PLoS ONE
Published
2011-12-02
Volume
6
Issue
12
Pages
e28330
ISSN
1932-6203 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1964505086
Cited by
241
References
65
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 21 · 2019: 23 · 2018: 21 · 2017: 19 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 23 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 15 · 2012: 7
FWCI
3.06
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • PLoS ONE (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • United States Pharmacopeia
  • Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (/14-1)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Biological Psychiatry › Tryptophan and brain disorders
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Behavioral Neuroscience › Stress Responses and Cortisol
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms
Keywords
endotoxin, lipopolysaccharide, acute systemic inflammation, dose-response relationship, working memory, long-term memory, emotional memory, anxiety, mood, cytokines, interleukin-6, cortisol, norepinephrine, neurobehavioral effects
MeSH terms
Adult, Attention, Behavior, Body Temperature, Body Weight, Dose-Response Relationship, Drug, Double-Blind Method, Endotoxins, Heart Rate, Humans, Inflammation, Lipopolysaccharides, Male, Memory, Models, Neurological, Placebos, Tumor Necrosis Factor-alpha, Interleukin-6, Body Mass Index, Interleukin-10, Cross-Over Studies, Interleukin 1 Receptor Antagonist Protein

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-10-06, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).

A second model labelled each claim on 2026-10-06 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review