Cited by 420Antifungal resistance and susceptibilityBacterial biofilms and quorum sensingInfection Control in Healthcare

Biofilm-Forming Capability of Highly Virulent, Multidrug-Resistant Candida auris

Open access
Sherry, Leighann, Ramage, Gordon, Kean, Ryan, Borman, Andrew, Johnson, Elizabeth M., Richardson, Malcolm D., Rautemaa-Richardson, Riina·2017·Emerging Infectious Diseases

Abstract

The emerging multidrug-resistant yeast pathogen Candida auris has attracted considerable attention as a source of healthcare-associated infections. We report that this highly virulent yeast has the capacity to form antifungal resistant biofilms sensitive to the disinfectant chlorhexidine in vitro.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3201/eid2302.161320

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Aggregating strains demonstrate higher biofilm-forming capacity.

    “Aggregation seems to play an important role in C. auris biofilm formation, since aggregating strains demonstrated higher biofilm-forming capacity, which was associated with distinct transcriptomic profiles compared to the non-aggregative strains (13, 23, 25, 57).”

    From Ume6-dependent pathways of morphogenesis and biofilm formation in <i>Candida auris</i> (2024) · cites this paper as [13]

    In The Study (page not provided), the two nonaggregative C. auris strains had biofilm biomass 2.4 and 1.5 times less than C. albicans, while the two aggregative strains had biomass 3.0 and 3.1 times less. The measured aggregative strains therefore formed less biofilm, not more, than the nonaggregative strains. (LLM, conf=0.90)

    Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Clinical features of C. auris infections include biofilm persistence on abiotic surfaces and skin, immune evasion, and antifungal drug resistance.

    “The clinical features of these infections include biofilm persistence on abiotic surfaces and skin, immune evasion, and antifungal drug resistance (7–12).”

    From Dual function of <i>Candida auris</i> mannosyltransferase, MNT5, in biofilm community protection from antifungal therapy and the host (2025) · cites this paper as [11]

    The Conclusions (page not provided) state that C. auris adheres to polymeric surfaces, forms biofilms, and resists antifungal agents, supporting the abiotic-surface and drug-resistance portions of the claim. The paper discusses disinfecting skin but does not establish biofilm persistence on skin or describe immune evasion. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Aggregative phenotype affects the virulence, antifungal susceptibility, and biofilm formation of C. auris.

    “Emerging evidence shows that aggregative phenotype affects the virulence, antifungal susceptibility, and biofilm formation of C. auris (11, 14, 15).”

    From Cell aggregation mediated by <i>ACE2</i> deletion in <i>Candida auris</i> modulates fungal colonization and host immune responses in the skin (2024) · cites this paper as [15]

    The Study reports different biofilm biomass among aggregative and nonaggregative C. auris strains and suggests enhanced virulence for the nonaggregative phenotype in a larval model. Its antifungal testing says the strains had mostly similar sensitivity profiles, with some strain-specific exceptions; it does not establish a general effect of aggregative phenotype on antifungal susceptibility. Page numbers are unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.83)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 10

  1. [1]Satoh K, Makimura K, Hasumi Y, Nishiyama Y, Uchida K, Yamaguchi H. Candida auris sp. nov., a novel ascomycetous yeast isolated from the external ear canal of an inpatient in a Japanese hospital. Microbiol Immunol. 2009; 53: 41– 4. 10.1111/j.1348-0421.2008.00083.x 19161556 · DOI · Paper page
  2. [2]Kathuria S, Singh PK, Sharma C, Prakash A, Masih A, Kumar A, et al. Multidrug-resistant Candida auris misidentified as Candida haemulonii: characterization by matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-time of flight mass spectrometry and DNA sequencing and its antifungal susceptibility profile variability by Vitek 2, CLSI broth microdilution, and Etest method. J Clin Microbiol. 2015; 53: 1823– 30. 10.1128/JCM.00367-15 25809970 PMC4432077 · DOI
  3. [5]Calvo B, Melo AS, Perozo-Mena A, Hernandez M, Francisco EC, Hagen F, et al. First report of Candida auris in America: Clinical and microbiological aspects of 18 episodes of candidemia. J Infect. 2016; 73: 369– 74. 10.1016/j.jinf.2016.07.008 27452195 · DOI
  4. [6]Kumar D, Banerjee T, Pratap CB, Tilak R. Itraconazole-resistant Candida auris with phospholipase, proteinase and hemolysin activity from a case of vulvovaginitis. J Infect Dev Ctries. 2015; 9: 435– 7. 10.3855/jidc.4582 25881537 · DOI
  5. [7]Oh BJ, Shin JH, Kim MN, Sung H, Lee K, Joo MY, et al. Biofilm formation and genotyping of Candida haemulonii, Candida pseudohaemulonii, and a proposed new species (Candida auris) isolates from Korea. Med Mycol. 2011; 49: 98– 102. 10.3109/13693786.2010.493563 20560864 · DOI
  6. [9]Borman AM, Szekely A, Johnson EM. Comparative pathogenicity of United Kingdom isolates of the emerging pathogen Candida auris and other key pathogenic Candida species. mSphere. 2016;1:pii:e00189-16. PMC4990711 27547827
  7. [11]Ramage G, Vande Walle K, Wickes BL, López-Ribot JL. Standardized method for in vitro antifungal susceptibility testing of Candida albicans biofilms. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2001; 45: 2475– 9. 10.1128/AAC.45.9.2475-2479.2001 11502517 PMC90680 · DOI · Paper page
  8. [12]Sherry L, Rajendran R, Lappin DF, Borghi E, Perdoni F, Falleni M, et al. Biofilms formed by Candida albicans bloodstream isolates display phenotypic and transcriptional heterogeneity that are associated with resistance and pathogenicity. BMC Microbiol. 2014; 14: 182. 10.1186/1471-2180-14-182 24996549 PMC4105547 · DOI
  9. [14]Pierce CG, Uppuluri P, Tristan AR, Wormley FL Jr, Mowat E, Ramage G, et al. A simple and reproducible 96-well plate-based method for the formation of fungal biofilms and its application to antifungal susceptibility testing. Nat Protoc. 2008; 3: 1494– 500. 10.1038/nprot.2008.141 18772877 PMC2741160 · DOI · Paper page
  10. [15]Rajendran R, Sherry L, Deshpande A, Johnson EM, Hanson MF, Williams C, et al. A prospective surveillance study of candidaemia: epidemiology, risk factors, antifungal treatment and outcome in hospitalized patients. Front Microbiol. 2016; 7: 915. 10.3389/fmicb.2016.00915 27379047 PMC4910670 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sherry, L., Ramage, G., Kean, R., Borman, A., Johnson, E. M., Richardson, M. D., & Rautemaa-Richardson, R.
Venue
Emerging Infectious Diseases
Published
2017-02
Volume
23
Issue
2
Pages
328-331
ISSN
  • 1080-6040 (ISSN-L)
  • 1080-6059
OpenAlex
W2572527541
Cited by
420
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 38 · 2025: 45 · 2024: 54 · 2023: 55 · 2022: 38 · 2021: 41 · 2020: 55 · 2019: 39 · 2018: 23 · 2017: 29
FWCI
30.73
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Emerging infectious diseases (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • ENLIGHTEN (Jurnal Bimbingan dan Konseling Islam) (acceptedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
  • Research Explorer (The University of Manchester) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
University of Glasgow
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Antifungal resistance and susceptibility
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Bacterial biofilms and quorum sensing
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Infection Control in Healthcare
Keywords
Candida auris, biofilm formation, multidrug resistance, antifungal resistance, chlorhexidine, disinfectant susceptibility, virulence, nosocomial infections, pathogenic yeasts
MeSH terms
Animals, Antifungal Agents, Candida, Candidiasis, Larva, Microbial Sensitivity Tests, Moths, Virulence, Biofilms, Drug Resistance, Multiple, Fungal

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review