Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 833

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The US National Comorbidity Survey Replication (NCS‐R): design and field procedures

Open access
Kessler, Ronald C., Berglund, Patricia, Chiu, Wai Tat, Demler, Olga, Heeringa, Steven, Hiripi, Eva, Jin, Robert, Pennell, Beth‐Ellen, Walters, Ellen E., Zaslavsky, Alan, Zheng, Hui·2004·International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research

Abstract

The National Comorbidity Survey Replication (NCS‐R) is a survey of the prevalence and correlates of mental disorders in the US that was carried out between February 2001 and April 2003. Interviews were administered face‐to‐face in the homes of respondents, who were selected from a nationally representative multi‐stage clustered area probability sample of households. A total of 9,282 interviews were completed in the main survey and an additional 554 short non‐response interviews were completed with initial non‐respondents. This paper describes the main features of the NCS‐R design and field procedures, including information on fieldwork organization and procedures, sample design, weighting and considerations in the use of design‐based versus model‐based estimation. Empirical information is presented on non‐response bias, design effect, and the trade‐off between bias and efficiency in minimizing total mean‐squared error of estimates by trimming weights. Copyright © 2004 Whurr Publishers Ltd.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/mpr.167

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Research works printed but not linked: 11

  1. 10.1080/01621459.1983.10478006 · DOI · Paper page
  2. Groves R, Survey Methodology
  3. Gurin G, 1960, Americans View Their Mental Health: A Nationwide Interview
  4. Kish L, 1974, Inferences from complex samples, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, 36, 1
  5. Kish L, 1965, Survey Sampling
  6. Tourangeau R, 1998, Computer Assisted Survey Information Collection, 431
  7. 10.1126/science.280.5365.867 · DOI · Paper page
  8. Turner CF, 1982, Survey Measurement of Drug Use: Methodological Studies
  9. Veroff J, 1981, The Inner American: A Self Portrait from 1957 to 1976
  10. Wolter KM, 1985, Introduction to Variance Estimation
  11. 10.1198/016214501753208889 · doi:10.1198/016214501753208889

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Kessler, R. C., Berglund, P., Chiu, W. T., Demler, O., Heeringa, S., Hiripi, E., Jin, R., Pennell, B., Walters, E. E., Zaslavsky, A., & Zheng, H.
Venue
International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2004-06
Volume
13
Issue
2
Pages
69-92
ISSN
  • 1049-8931 (ISSN-L)
  • 1557-0657
OpenAlex
W2033377029
Cited by
833
References
2
FWCI
98.78
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.