Cited by 128Bipolar Disorder and TreatmentNeural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesTreatment of Major Depression

Specifying the Neuropsychology of Affective Disorders: Clinical, Demographic and Neurobiological Factors

Beblo, Thomas, Sinnamon, Grant, Baune, Bernhard T.·2011·Neuropsychology Review

Abstract

Neuropsychological research in patients with affective disorders shows heterogeneous results with regard to the severity and profile of cognitive impairments. In this paper we hypothesize that the investigation of clinical (subtypes, comorbidity, traumatization, personality, severity, diurnal swings, course, duration, age of onset, biased processing, rumination, motivation, experience of failure, sleep, suicidal tendencies, computer attitudes), demographic (age, education, gender) and neurobiological factors (structural and functional brain changes, glucocorticoids, medication, ECT) that are related to cognitive performance has specified the understanding of severity and profile of neuropsychological impairments. We reviewed the literature pertaining to clinical, demographic and neurobiological factors following Pubmed and PsychInfo databases using different combinations of general key-terms including "Affective Disorder," "Depression," "Mania," "Neuropsychological," "Neurobiological," "Moderator," and "Review" as well as more specific demographic, clinical and neurobiological search terms. Findings from the literature show that the consideration of these factors has improved knowledge about the severity of neuropsychological impairments in patients with affective disorders whereas the neuropsychological profile is still poorly understood. Despite limited understanding, however, the existent results provide promising suggestions for the development of treatment programs.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s11065-011-9171-0

Cites

219 of 219 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Beblo, T., Sinnamon, G., & Baune, B. T.
Affiliations
  • Evangelisches Krankenhaus Bielefeld (DE)
  • The University of Adelaide (AU)
Corresponding author
Beblo, Thomas
Venue
Neuropsychology Review
Published
2011-06-10
Volume
21
Issue
4
Pages
337-359
ISSN
  • 1040-7308 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-6660
OpenAlex
W2012053067
Cited by
128
References
219
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 17 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 10
FWCI
1.17
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Neuropsychology Review (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • ResearchOnline - JCU (James Cook University) (submittedVersion)
  • Adelaide Research & Scholarship (AR&S) (University of Adelaide) (submittedVersion)
  • PUB – Publications at Bielefeld University (Bielefeld University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Bipolar Disorder and Treatment
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Treatment of Major Depression
Keywords
mood disorders, neuropsychological deficits, cognitive impairment, depression, mania, comorbidities, trauma, personality, disease severity, diurnal variation, sleep, suicidality, rumination, motivation, glucocorticoids, electroconvulsive therapy, medication effects, demographic factors, age of onset, treatment development
MeSH terms
Bipolar Disorder, Brain, Cognition Disorders, Depressive Disorder, Humans, Neurobiology, Neuropsychological Tests, Neuropsychology, Comorbidity, Mood Disorders

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review