Cited by 342Mindfulness and Compassion InterventionsStress and Burnout ResearchHealthcare professionals’ stress and burnout

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 94 of the 94 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; 4 of the 108 sources its claims cite were checked for support.

The Effectiveness of Mindfulness-Based Stress Reduction on the Psychological Functioning of Healthcare Professionals: a Systematic Review

Open access

Abstract

Burnout and occupational stress are frequently experienced by healthcare professionals (HCPs). Mindfulness-based stress reduction (MBSR) has been found to improve the psychological health outcomes of HCPs. To date, systematic reviews and meta-analyses have primarily focused upon empirical investigations into the reduction of stress amongst HCPs using MBSR and are limited to empirical studies published before December 2019. This systematic review aimed to update the current evidence base and broaden our understanding of the effectiveness of MBSR on improving the psychological functioning of HCPs. Three electronic databases (Medline, Psych Info and Web of Science) were searched without time frame restrictions. Quantitative studies included randomised controlled trials, clinical controlled trials, pre-post designs and studies with up to a 12-month follow-up period. All studies included in the review employed a MBSR programme, standardised measures of psychological functioning and qualified HCPs as participants. Using PRISMA guidelines thirty studies were included in the review. The reviewed literature suggested that MBSR was effective in reducing HCPs experiences of anxiety, depression and stress. MBSR was also found to be effective in increasing HCP levels of mindfulness and self-compassion. However, MBSR did not appear as effective in reducing burnout or improving resilience amongst HCPs. Abbreviated MBSR programmes were found to be as effective as the traditional 8-week MBSR programmes. MBSR is an effective intervention which can help improve the psychological functioning of HCPs. Recommendations include improving the overall quality of the studies by employing more robust controlled designs with randomisation, increased sample sizes with heterogeneous samples, and making active comparisons between interventions used.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s12671-020-01500-9

Cites

94 of 94 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

59 Not checked yet · 38 Own result · 23 Own interpretation · 19 Own method · 3 No basis given · 1 Supported · 1 Supported so far · 1 Partly supported · accuracy not yet measured

Verify all 104 references — free account

Show all 59 claims

  • It may state two separate claims as one. 60
  • Probably not a substantial claim. 36
  • The quote only partly states this claim. 3
86 of 86
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Students and in-training healthcare professionals experience different stressors from qualified healthcare professionals.

    “Students and in-training HCPs were excluded due to this population arguably having differing stressors to qualified HCPs (e.g., exam conditions, deadlines for assignments and managing academic and clinical demands).”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Shorter MBSR programmes cost significantly less to deliver.

    “Furthermore, shorter MBSR programmes cost significantly less to deliver, which is an important factor in the current climate where healthcare organisations are under constant pressure to make financial savings.”
2 of 2

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.

1 of 1

Citations

Cites

Show all 94 references

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Farber, B. A. (1983). Introduction: A critical perspective on burnout. In B. A. Farber (Ed.), Stress and burnout in the human services professions (pp. 1–20). New York, NY: Pergamon.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Kriakous, S. A., Elliott, K. A., Lamers, C., & Owen, R.
Affiliations
  • Bangor University (GB)
  • Ysbyty Gwynedd Hospital NHS Trust (GB)
Corresponding author
Kriakous, Sarah Angela
Venue
Mindfulness
Published
2020-09-24
Volume
12
Issue
1
Pages
1-28
ISSN
  • 1868-8527 (ISSN-L)
  • 1868-8535
OpenAlex
W3088381375
Cited by
342
References
94
Citations by year
2026: 56 · 2025: 80 · 2024: 77 · 2023: 53 · 2022: 50 · 2021: 22 · 2020: 3
FWCI
2.51
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Mindfulness (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Stress and Burnout Research
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Healthcare professionals’ stress and burnout
Keywords
mindfulness-based stress reduction, healthcare workers, burnout, occupational stress, anxiety, depression, self-compassion, resilience, psychological functioning

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-09-28, under version 3 of the claim definition (prompt extract-v3).

A second model labelled each claim on 2026-09-28 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).

Cited sources are checked with a language model’s help (gpt-6-sol).

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review