The DOI matches its Crossref record; 205 of the 206 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; none of the 167 sources its claims cite is checked for support yet.
Non-viral delivery systems for CRISPR/Cas9-based genome editing: Challenges and opportunities
Open accessAbstract
In recent years, CRISPR (clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeat)/Cas (CRISPR-associated) genome editing systems have become one of the most robust platforms in basic biomedical research and therapeutic applications. To date, efficient in vivo delivery of the CRISPR/Cas9 system to the targeted cells remains a challenge. Although viral vectors have been widely used in the delivery of the CRISPR/Cas9 system in vitro and in vivo, their fundamental shortcomings, such as the risk of carcinogenesis, limited insertion size, immune responses and difficulty in large-scale production, severely limit their further applications. Alternative non-viral delivery systems for CRISPR/Cas9 are urgently needed. With the rapid development of non-viral vectors, lipid- or polymer-based nanocarriers have shown great potential for CRISPR/Cas9 delivery. In this review, we analyze the pros and cons of delivering CRISPR/Cas9 systems in the form of plasmid, mRNA, or protein and then discuss the limitations and challenges of CRISPR/Cas9-based genome editing. Furthermore, current non-viral vectors that have been applied for CRISPR/Cas9 delivery in vitro and in vivo are outlined in details. Finally, critical obstacles for non-viral delivery of CRISPR/Cas9 system are highlighted and promising strategies to overcome these barriers are proposed.
Overview
AI snapshot
Written from the paper’s full text.
TL;DR
This review argues that efficient in vivo delivery remains a major hurdle for CRISPR/Cas9 genome editing and that non-viral vectors are promising alternatives to viral vectors despite lower delivery efficiency. It surveys plasmid, mRNA, and protein delivery formats, then outlines non-viral vector examples and extracellular/intracellular barriers to clinical translation.
Key findings
- Non-viral vectors may offer low immunogenicity, absence of endogenous virus recombination, less limitation on large genetic payloads, and ease of large-scale production, but relatively low gene delivery efficiency and transgene expression remain major barriers.
- The review compares three CRISPR/Cas9 delivery formats: plasmid DNA is simple and stable but large (>7 kb total plasmid) and requires nuclear entry; mRNA gives quick, transient expression but has poor stability and possible low efficiency; Cas9/sgRNA ribonucleoprotein gives the swiftest, most transient editing but is difficult to deliver due to Cas9 size (~160 kD) and charge.
- Reported non-viral delivery examples include up to 30% editing in HeLa, HEK-293T, and Raw 264.7 cells with arginine-modified gold nanoparticles; 37% reduction in EGFP expression in CHO cells over 4 days with ZIFs; ~39% editing in AGS cells with GO-PEG-PEI; ~20% Cas9-mediated genome modification in cochlear hair cells after Cas9:sgRNA injection; >6% hepatocyte correction in a hereditary tyrosinemia mouse model; and >97% (mice) or >90% (rats) reduction in serum TTR protein levels with LNP-INT01, with editing persisting at least 12 months.
- The paper highlights barriers including encapsulation difficulty, physiological instability, host immune responses, insufficient targeted accumulation, phagocytic/RES clearance, cellular uptake, endosomal/lysosomal degradation, cytoplasmic mobility, and nuclear import.
Methods
- Design: narrative review of non-viral delivery systems for CRISPR/Cas9-based genome editing, focusing on challenges and opportunities rather than presenting new primary data.
- Data/sample: published literature and selected in vitro and in vivo studies on CRISPR/Cas9 delivery using plasmid, mRNA, or protein formats and non-viral vectors.
- Main analysis: thematic synthesis of delivery formats, non-viral vector examples, disease applications, and extracellular/intracellular delivery barriers, with proposed strategies to overcome them.
Limitations
- The paper states that non-viral vectors face two main in vivo limitations: serum stability of polyplexes after systemic administration and relatively low transfection efficiency in targeted tissues. It also states that non-viral vectors applied in CRISPR/Cas9 delivery remain very few and that cationic lipid-based vectors, though among the most effective to date, are mainly limited to local administration.
- The paper states multiple delivery obstacles: effective encapsulation due to large size and charge properties of Cas9 protein, mRNA, and donor DNA; instability under physiological conditions; host immune responses; insufficient accumulation in target tissues; phagocytic clearance and RES blockage; cellular uptake; endosomal/lysosomal degradation; and cytoplasmic mobility/nuclear import.
- Evident from the text: this is a narrative review with selected examples rather than a systematic review or meta-analysis, so it does not provide quantitative pooled estimates or comprehensive comparative efficacy across all non-viral systems.
Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
0 of 167 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged
In the paper
“This approach allows for robust DNA knock-in in both dividing and non-dividing cells in vitro and in vivo [87].”
§ Non-viral delivery systems for CRISPR/Cas9-based genome editing: challenges and opportunities > 2. Limitations and challenges of CRISPR/Cas9-based genome editing
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [87] Suzuki, 2016, In vivo genome editing via CRISPR/Cas9 mediated homology-independent targeted integration, Nature source
Strength:boosted· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIn the paper
“More importantly, the editing levels can persist for at least 12 months, despite the transient nature of the delivery system and the editing components.”
§ Non-viral delivery systems for CRISPR/Cas9-based genome editing: challenges and opportunities > 4. Current non-viral delivery vectors for CRISPR/Cas9 delivery > 4.2 Non-viral vectors in vivo
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [116] Jonathan, 2018, A single administration of CRISPR/Cas9 lipid nanoparticles achieves robust and persistent in vivo genome editing, Cell Rep. source
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIn the paper
“In another study, Miller et al. reported a non-viral vector based on zwitterionic amino lipids to deliver Cas9 mRNA and sgRNAs. In contrast to transient therapies, they showed permanent editing of LoxP gene in genetically engineered mice containing a homozygous Rosa26 promoter Lox-Stop-Lox tdTomato (tdTO) cassette after intravenous administration [105].”
§ Non-viral delivery systems for CRISPR/Cas9-based genome editing: challenges and opportunities > 4. Current non-viral delivery vectors for CRISPR/Cas9 delivery > 4.2 Non-viral vectors in vivo
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [105] Miller, 2017, Non-Viral CRISPR/Cas gene editing in vitro and in vivo enabled by synthetic nanoparticle co-delivery of Cas9 mRNA and sgRNA, Angew Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. source
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIn the paper
“Jiang et al. developed lipid-like nanoparticles for targeted delivery of Cas9 mRNA and sgRNA to the liver. This system achieved disruption of HBV DNA and the proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (pcsk9) gene in vivo [104].”
§ Non-viral delivery systems for CRISPR/Cas9-based genome editing: challenges and opportunities > 4. Current non-viral delivery vectors for CRISPR/Cas9 delivery > 4.2 Non-viral vectors in vivo
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [104] Jiang, 2017, A non-viral CRISPR/Cas9 delivery system for therapeutically targeting HBV DNA and pcsk9 in vivo, Cell Res. source
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIn the paper
“Zuris et al. injected Cas9:sgRNA complexes targeting GFP gene into the cochlea of transgenic Atoh1-GFP mice. This system resulted in ~20% Cas9-mediated genome modification in hair cells [69].”
§ Non-viral delivery systems for CRISPR/Cas9-based genome editing: challenges and opportunities > 4. Current non-viral delivery vectors for CRISPR/Cas9 delivery > 4.2 Non-viral vectors in vivo
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [69] Lehrman, 1999, Virus treatment questioned after gene therapy death, Nature source
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIn the paper
“Self-assembled DNA nanoclews were constructed for CRISPR/Cas9-based genome editing system delivery. After being loaded with CRISPR RNPs, these nanoclews enabled efficient target disruption of EGFP gene in vitro and in U2OS.EGFP xenograft tumor models in vivo after intratumoral injection [103].”
§ Non-viral delivery systems for CRISPR/Cas9-based genome editing: challenges and opportunities > 4. Current non-viral delivery vectors for CRISPR/Cas9 delivery > 4.2 Non-viral vectors in vivo
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [103] Sun, 2015, Self-assembled DNA nanoclews for the efficient delivery of CRISPR-Cas9 for genome editing, Angew Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. source
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIn the paper
“Additionally, unlike viral delivery systems, the synthetic nature of LNP-INT01 allowed for multi-dosing regimens to obtain cumulative editing efficacy without significant changes in cytokine levels or body weight.”
§ Non-viral delivery systems for CRISPR/Cas9-based genome editing: challenges and opportunities > 4. Current non-viral delivery vectors for CRISPR/Cas9 delivery > 4.2 Non-viral vectors in vivo
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [116] Jonathan, 2018, A single administration of CRISPR/Cas9 lipid nanoparticles achieves robust and persistent in vivo genome editing, Cell Rep. source
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIn the paper
“With this approach, they edited AAVS1 gene and PTEN gene and achieved effective gene editing efficiency up to 30% in HeLa, HEK-293T and Raw 264.7 cell lines (Fig. 2A) [97].”
§ Non-viral delivery systems for CRISPR/Cas9-based genome editing: challenges and opportunities > 4. Current non-viral delivery vectors for CRISPR/Cas9 delivery > 4.1 Non-viral vectors in vitro and ex vivo
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [97] Mout, 2017, Direct cytosolic delivery of CRISPR/Cas9-ribonucleoprotein for efficient gene editing, ACS Nano source
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIn the paper
“After loading with CRISPR/Cas9 targeting polo-like kinase 1 (plk1) gene, LHNPs effectively inhibited U87MG tumor growth [119].”
§ Non-viral delivery systems for CRISPR/Cas9-based genome editing: challenges and opportunities > 4. Current non-viral delivery vectors for CRISPR/Cas9 delivery > 4.2 Non-viral vectors in vivo
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [119] Chen, 2017, Targeted delivery of CRISPR/Cas9-mediated cancer gene therapy via liposome-templated hydrogel nanoparticlesaptation repertoires, Adv. Funct. Mater. source
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIn the paper
“In a recent study, graphene oxide-poly(ethylene glycol)-polyethylenimine (GO-PEG-PEI) nanocarrier mediated efficient CRISPR RNPs delivery via physisorption and π-stacking interaction. This strategy induced efficient genome editing in AGS cells with an efficiency of ~39% (Fig. 2D) [102].”
§ Non-viral delivery systems for CRISPR/Cas9-based genome editing: challenges and opportunities > 4. Current non-viral delivery vectors for CRISPR/Cas9 delivery > 4.1 Non-viral vectors in vitro and ex vivo
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [102] Yue, 2018, Graphene oxide-mediated Cas9/sgRNA delivery for efficient genome editing, Nanoscale source
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passes
- It may state two separate claims as one. 39
- The quote only partly states this claim. 1
- Probably not a substantial claim. 19
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“However, the desired recombination efficacy often occurs infrequently, which presents enormous challenges for robust applications [61, 82–84].”
§ Non-viral delivery systems for CRISPR/Cas9-based genome editing: challenges and opportunities > 2. Limitations and challenges of CRISPR/Cas9-based genome editing
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [61] Wang, 2013, One-step generation of mice carrying mutations in multiple genes by CRISPR/Cas-mediated genome engineering, Cell source
- Not checked yetcites [82] Chu, 2015, Increasing the efficiency of homology-directed repair for CRISPR-Cas9-induced precise gene editing in mammalian cells, Nat. Biotechnol. source
- Not checked yetcites [83] Yu, 2015, Small molecules enhance CRISPR genome editing in pluripotent stem cells, Cell Stem Cell source
- Not checked yetcites [84] Yang, 2013, One-step generation of mice carrying reporter and conditional alleles by CRISPR/Cas-mediated genome engineering, Cell source
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Although inhibiting the NHEJ pathway with gene silencing or chemical inhibitors can partially increase the efficiency of HDR pathway, the gene repair efficacy still needs to be further improved for disease therapy [82, 85].”
§ Non-viral delivery systems for CRISPR/Cas9-based genome editing: challenges and opportunities > 2. Limitations and challenges of CRISPR/Cas9-based genome editing
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [82] Chu, 2015, Increasing the efficiency of homology-directed repair for CRISPR-Cas9-induced precise gene editing in mammalian cells, Nat. Biotechnol. source
- Not checked yetcites [85] Maruyama, 2015, Increasing the efficiency of precise genome editing with CRISPR-Cas9 by inhibition of nonhomologous end joining, Nat. Biotechnol. source
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:conditional· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“This system induced higher targeted gene disruption efficacy than that of Lipofectamine 3000 in vitro. After intraperitoneal administration, they also showed effective disruption of targeted MTH1 gene and significantly inhibited the progression of ovarian tumor in vivo (Fig. 4A) [117].”
§ Non-viral delivery systems for CRISPR/Cas9-based genome editing: challenges and opportunities > 4. Current non-viral delivery vectors for CRISPR/Cas9 delivery > 4.2 Non-viral vectors in vivo
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [117] Li, 2017, Artificial vrus delivers CRISPR-Cas9 system for genome editing of cells in mice, ACS Nano source
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“This delivery system enabled effective knock-outs of target gene (Plk-1) and inhibited the growth of melanoma both in vitro and in vivo (Fig. 4B) [118].”
§ Non-viral delivery systems for CRISPR/Cas9-based genome editing: challenges and opportunities > 4. Current non-viral delivery vectors for CRISPR/Cas9 delivery > 4.2 Non-viral vectors in vivo
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [118] Wang, 2018, Thermo-triggered release of CRISPR-Cas9 system by lipid-encapsulated gold nanoparticles for tumor therapy, Angew Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. source
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“All these results demonstrated that this system substantially reduced progressive hearing loss in Beethoven mouse model (Fig. 3B) [113].”
§ Non-viral delivery systems for CRISPR/Cas9-based genome editing: challenges and opportunities > 4. Current non-viral delivery vectors for CRISPR/Cas9 delivery > 4.2 Non-viral vectors in vivo
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [113] Gao, 2018, Treatment of autosomal dominant hearing loss by in vivo delivery of genome editing agents, Nature source
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesThe quote only partly states this claim.
In the paper
“After being injected into the hindlimb muscle of mdx mice simultaneously with cardiotoxin (CTX), this system efficiently corrected the DNA mutation that causes DMD in mice with reduced off-target effect and reduced muscle fibrosis in mdx mice (Fig. 3A) [110].”
§ Non-viral delivery systems for CRISPR/Cas9-based genome editing: challenges and opportunities > 4. Current non-viral delivery vectors for CRISPR/Cas9 delivery > 4.2 Non-viral vectors in vivo
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [110] Lee, 2017, Nanoparticle delivery of Cas9 ribonucleoprotein and donor DNA in vivo induces homology-directed DNA repair, Nat. Biomed. Eng. source
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Ramakrishna et al. developed cell-penetrating peptide (CPP)-conjugated recombinant Cas9 protein and CPP-complexed guide RNAs for gene disruptions of CCR5 locus in human cell lines, including HEK293T, HeLa, NCCIT (a human pluripotent embryonal carcinoma cell line), human dermal fibroblasts and human embryonic stem cells.”
- Also stated in: § 4.1 Non-viral vectors in vitro and ex vivo · plain
“This system led to efficient disruptions of CCR5 gene with minimal off-target mutations [96].”
§ Non-viral delivery systems for CRISPR/Cas9-based genome editing: challenges and opportunities > 4. Current non-viral delivery vectors for CRISPR/Cas9 delivery > 4.1 Non-viral vectors in vitro and ex vivo
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [96] Ramakrishna, 2014, Gene disruption by cell-penetrating peptide-mediated delivery of Cas9 protein and guide RNA, Genome Res. source
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
- Also stated in: § 4.1 Non-viral vectors in vitro and ex vivo · plain
In the paper
“With a single intravenous administration, this system enabled significant editing of the TTR gene in the liver of mice or rats, and resulted in a dramatic reduction (>97% for mice, >90% for rats) in serum TTR protein levels.”
§ Non-viral delivery systems for CRISPR/Cas9-based genome editing: challenges and opportunities > 4. Current non-viral delivery vectors for CRISPR/Cas9 delivery > 4.2 Non-viral vectors in vivo
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [116] Jonathan, 2018, A single administration of CRISPR/Cas9 lipid nanoparticles achieves robust and persistent in vivo genome editing, Cell Rep. source
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Yin et al. combined lipid nanoparticle-mediated delivery of Cas9 mRNA with AAV encoding sgRNAs and donor templates to repair FAH gene in a mouse model of human hereditary tyrosinemia. The efficiency of correction was >6% of hepatocytes after a single application and the treatment rescued disease symptoms such as weight loss and liver damage [112].”
§ Non-viral delivery systems for CRISPR/Cas9-based genome editing: challenges and opportunities > 4. Current non-viral delivery vectors for CRISPR/Cas9 delivery > 4.2 Non-viral vectors in vivo
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [112] Yin, 2016, Therapeutic genome editing by combined viral and non-viral delivery of CRISPR system components in vivo, Nat. Biotechnol. source
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“However, with the rapid development of novel biomaterials in recent years, efficient delivery of gene payloads to pass the multiple barriers under physiological conditions and promote transgene expression can be achieved.”
§ Non-viral delivery systems for CRISPR/Cas9-based genome editing: challenges and opportunities > 1. Introduction
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Nevertheless, with the rapid development of various synthetic vectors, non-viral vectors are very likely to provide unique advantages over viral vectors in these fields.”
§ Non-viral delivery systems for CRISPR/Cas9-based genome editing: challenges and opportunities > 4. Current non-viral delivery vectors for CRISPR/Cas9 delivery > 4.2 Non-viral vectors in vivo
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✗ Checkable: fails✓ Load-bearing: passes✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“It also offers the most transient functionality of genome editing cassette with reduced off-target effects and toxicity.”
§ Non-viral delivery systems for CRISPR/Cas9-based genome editing: challenges and opportunities > 3. Modes of CRISPR/Cas9 delivery
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“As an alternative, non-viral vectors may offer tantalizing possibility in CRISPR/Cas9 delivery with respect to their low immunogenicity, absence of endogenous virus recombination, less limitation in delivering larger genetic payloads and ease of large-scale production [73–75].”
§ Non-viral delivery systems for CRISPR/Cas9-based genome editing: challenges and opportunities > 1. Introduction
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [73] Pack, 2005, Design and development of polymers for gene delivery, Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. source
- Not checked yetcites [74] Li, 2007, Non-viral is superior to viral gene delivery, J. Control Release source
- Not checked yetcites [75] Li, 2015, Challenges in CRISPR/CAS9 delivery: potential roles of nonviral vectors, Hum. Gene Ther. source
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Although viral vectors have been widely used in the delivery of the CRISPR/Cas9 system in vitro and in vivo, their fundamental shortcomings, such as the risk of carcinogenesis, limited insertion size, immune responses and difficulty in large-scale production, severely limit their further applications.”
- Also stated in: § 1. Introduction · plain
“Similarly, although highly efficient, the intrinsic drawbacks associated with viral vectors, including the risk of carcinogenesis, limitation of insertion size, immune responses and difficulty in large-scale production, severely limited their applications [69–72].”
§ Non-viral delivery systems for CRISPR/Cas9-based genome editing: challenges and opportunities > Abstract
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [69] Lehrman, 1999, Virus treatment questioned after gene therapy death, Nature source
- Not checked yetcites [70] Gore, 2003, Adverse effects of gene therapy: gene therapy can cause leukaemia: no shock, mild horror but a probe, Gene Ther. source
- Not checked yetcites [71] Donahue, 1992, Helper virus induced T cell lymphoma in nonhuman primates after retroviral mediated gene transfer, J. Exp. Med. source
- Not checked yetcites [72] Sun, 2003, Immune responses to adeno-associated virus and its recombinant vectors, Gene Ther. source
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
- Also stated in: § 1. Introduction · plain
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Furthermore, CRISPR/Cas9 system holds tremendous promise for gene therapy [46–51]. It can correct causal mutations in the original genome and rescue the disease phenotypes of monogenic disorders permanently, which currently represents the most translatable field in CRISPR/Cas9-mediated disease therapy.”
§ Non-viral delivery systems for CRISPR/Cas9-based genome editing: challenges and opportunities > 1. Introduction
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [46] Yin, 2014, Genome editing with Cas9 in adult mice corrects a disease mutation and phenotype, Nat. Biotechnol. source
- Not checked yetcites [47] Wu, 2013, Correction of a genetic disease in mouse via use of CRISPR-Cas9, Cell Stem Cell source
- Not checked yetcites [48] Lin, 2014, The CRISPR/Cas9 system facilitates clearance of the intrahepatic HBV templates in vivo, Mol. Ther. Nucleic Acids source
- Not checked yetcites [49] Dever, 2016, CRISPR/Cas9 β-globin gene targeting in human haematopoietic stem cells, Nature source
- Not checked yetcites [50] Gaj, 2017, In vivo genome editing improves motor function and extends survival in a mouse model of ALS, Sci. Adv. source
- Not checked yetcites [51] Bengtsson, 2017, Muscle-specific CRISPR/Cas9 dystrophin gene editing ameliorates pathophysiology in a mouse model for Duchenne muscular dystrophy, Nat. Commun. source
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“However, due to the multiple functions of epigenetics, safety is a big concern that needs special attention when applying these strategies.”
§ Non-viral delivery systems for CRISPR/Cas9-based genome editing: challenges and opportunities > 4. Current non-viral delivery vectors for CRISPR/Cas9 delivery > 4.2 Non-viral vectors in vivo
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The second obstacle for plasmid-based expression is the requirement of nuclear entry for DNA transcription, which partially decreases the genome editing efficiency and also induces the delay in therapeutic efficacy.”
§ Non-viral delivery systems for CRISPR/Cas9-based genome editing: challenges and opportunities > 3. Modes of CRISPR/Cas9 delivery
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Furthermore, Cas9 mRNA delivery provides transient expression of Cas9 protein, which may be helpful for decreasing the off-target editing events.”
§ Non-viral delivery systems for CRISPR/Cas9-based genome editing: challenges and opportunities > 3. Modes of CRISPR/Cas9 delivery
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:conditional· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Like RNPs, Cas9 mRNA administration results in quick onset of genome editing, as Cas9 mRNA bypasses the requirement of nuclear entry for transcription.”
§ Non-viral delivery systems for CRISPR/Cas9-based genome editing: challenges and opportunities > 3. Modes of CRISPR/Cas9 delivery
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Monogenic diseases can tolerate a low initial gene editing efficiency due to the selective advantages of the corrected cells, while cancer treatment requires relatively high editing efficiency to ensure effective therapy, because the unedited cancer cells possess selective advantages and proliferate quickly.”
§ Non-viral delivery systems for CRISPR/Cas9-based genome editing: challenges and opportunities > 4. Current non-viral delivery vectors for CRISPR/Cas9 delivery > 4.2 Non-viral vectors in vivo
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“In addition, the plasmid-based expression often leads to a longer duration of Cas9 protein, which may result in higher off-target effects and strong immune responses [95].”
§ Non-viral delivery systems for CRISPR/Cas9-based genome editing: challenges and opportunities > 3. Modes of CRISPR/Cas9 delivery
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [95] Hughes, 2009, Immunogenicity of intrathecal plasmid gene delivery: cytokine release and effects on transgene expression, J. Gene Med. source
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:conditional· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Generally, CRISPR/Cas9 systems delivered by viral or no-viral vectors are more likely to work well in vitro and ex vivo owing to the direct interaction with cells.”
§ Non-viral delivery systems for CRISPR/Cas9-based genome editing: challenges and opportunities > 4. Current non-viral delivery vectors for CRISPR/Cas9 delivery > 4.1 Non-viral vectors in vitro and ex vivo
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:conditional· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“dCas9-KRAB system, recruiting a diverse array of histone modifiers that reversibly suppresses gene expression through the formation of heterochromatin, significantly reduced the expression of a series of endogenous genes in the genome [125, 128].”
§ Non-viral delivery systems for CRISPR/Cas9-based genome editing: challenges and opportunities > 4. Current non-viral delivery vectors for CRISPR/Cas9 delivery > 4.2 Non-viral vectors in vivo
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [125] Thakore, 2015, Highly specific epigenome editing by CRISPR-Cas9 repressors for silencing of distal regulatory elements, Nat. Methods source
- Not checked yetcites [128] Thakore, 2016, Editing the epigenome: technologies for programmable transcription and epigenetic modulation, Nat. Methods source
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In recent years, CRISPR/Cas9 systems have been widely applied in manipulating mouse zygotes and cultured cells ex vivo and in vitro.”
§ Non-viral delivery systems for CRISPR/Cas9-based genome editing: challenges and opportunities > 4. Current non-viral delivery vectors for CRISPR/Cas9 delivery > 4.1 Non-viral vectors in vitro and ex vivo
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Generally, the particles should be nano-sized and the junction of endothelial cells has a great influence on the extravasation of these particles.”
§ Non-viral delivery systems for CRISPR/Cas9-based genome editing: challenges and opportunities > 5. Critical obstacles for non-viral delivery of CRISPR/Cas9 system
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“The molecular weight of the commonly used Cas9 protein from streptococcus pyogenes is about 160 KD, larger than that of the most proteins [89].”
§ Non-viral delivery systems for CRISPR/Cas9-based genome editing: challenges and opportunities > 5. Critical obstacles for non-viral delivery of CRISPR/Cas9 system
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [89] Subburaj, 2016, Site-directed mutagenesis in Petunia x hybrida protoplast system using direct delivery of purified recombinant Cas9 ribonucleoproteins, Plant Cell Rep. source
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Following systemic administration, the elements of CRISPR/Cas9 system should remain stable before reaching its target site. Then the elements need to be effectively taken up by the targeted cell types and escape from endo-lysosome system to avoid degradation.”
§ Non-viral delivery systems for CRISPR/Cas9-based genome editing: challenges and opportunities > 5. Critical obstacles for non-viral delivery of CRISPR/Cas9 system
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“This issue is very important for targeted gene editing efficacy as well as the off-target probability in other tissues.”
§ Non-viral delivery systems for CRISPR/Cas9-based genome editing: challenges and opportunities > 5. Critical obstacles for non-viral delivery of CRISPR/Cas9 system
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“There are two main limitations of non-viral vectors-mediated CRISPR/Cas9 delivery in vivo. The first one is the serum stability of polyplexes after systemic administration [73]. The second one is the relatively low transfection efficiency in the targeted tissues after administration in vivo [76, 77].”
§ Non-viral delivery systems for CRISPR/Cas9-based genome editing: challenges and opportunities > 4. Current non-viral delivery vectors for CRISPR/Cas9 delivery > 4.2 Non-viral vectors in vivo
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [73] Pack, 2005, Design and development of polymers for gene delivery, Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. source
- Not checked yetcites [76] Mintzer, 2009, Nonviral vectors for gene delivery, Chem. Rev. source
- Not checked yetcites [77] Davis, 2002, Non-viral gene delivery systems, Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. source
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Meanwhile, native Cas9 protein is positively charged, while the conventional proteins are negatively charged [88, 97, 103, 139].”
§ Non-viral delivery systems for CRISPR/Cas9-based genome editing: challenges and opportunities > 5. Critical obstacles for non-viral delivery of CRISPR/Cas9 system
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [88] Zuris, 2015, Cationic lipid-mediated delivery of proteins enables efficient protein-based genome editing in vitro and in vivo, Nat. Biotechnol. source
- Not checked yetcites [97] Mout, 2017, Direct cytosolic delivery of CRISPR/Cas9-ribonucleoprotein for efficient gene editing, ACS Nano source
- Not checked yetcites [103] Sun, 2015, Self-assembled DNA nanoclews for the efficient delivery of CRISPR-Cas9 for genome editing, Angew Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. source
- Not checked yetcites [139] Jinek, 2014, Structures of Cas9 endonucleases reveal RNA-mediated conformational activation, Science source
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“However, the effects of either siRNA or chemical inhibitor are transient and are limited to the mother cell that takes the drug. If the cell divides, these drugs will lose activity in the daughter cells.”
§ Non-viral delivery systems for CRISPR/Cas9-based genome editing: challenges and opportunities > 4. Current non-viral delivery vectors for CRISPR/Cas9 delivery > 4.2 Non-viral vectors in vivo
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“These issues are not just for non-viral vectors-mediated CRISPR/Cas9 delivery, but for non-viral vectors-mediated gene delivery in general.”
§ Non-viral delivery systems for CRISPR/Cas9-based genome editing: challenges and opportunities > 4. Current non-viral delivery vectors for CRISPR/Cas9 delivery > 4.2 Non-viral vectors in vivo
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“On the one hand, protein, plasmid and RNA are vulnerable to proteases and nucleases in the blood. They can degrade quickly in naked form in systemic circulation.”
§ Non-viral delivery systems for CRISPR/Cas9-based genome editing: challenges and opportunities > 5. Critical obstacles for non-viral delivery of CRISPR/Cas9 system
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Although the newly discovered Cas9 form from Staphylococcus aureus strain (SaCas9) is about 1 kb shorter than SpCas9, the overall genetic size is still too large for application [94, 140].”
§ Non-viral delivery systems for CRISPR/Cas9-based genome editing: challenges and opportunities > 5. Critical obstacles for non-viral delivery of CRISPR/Cas9 system
What the sources say
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“PEGylation, the most commonly used strategy to reduce the opsonization and minimize the clearance by RES, may also be applicable for non-viral vectors-mediated CRISPR/Cas9 delivery [144, 145].”
§ Non-viral delivery systems for CRISPR/Cas9-based genome editing: challenges and opportunities > 5. Critical obstacles for non-viral delivery of CRISPR/Cas9 system
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [144] Ogris, 1999, PEGylated DNA/transferrin-PEI complexes: reduced interaction with blood components, extended circulation in blood and potential for systemic gene delivery, Gene Ther. source
- Not checked yetcites [145] Malam, 2011, Current trends in the application of nanoparticles in drug delivery, Curr. Med. Chem. source
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:conditional· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“In the past decades, there have been extensive efforts on facilitating particles accumulation in the targeted tissues for non-viral delivery vectors-mediated gene therapy [155, 156].”
§ Non-viral delivery systems for CRISPR/Cas9-based genome editing: challenges and opportunities > 5. Critical obstacles for non-viral delivery of CRISPR/Cas9 system
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [155] Liu, 2017, Tumor associated macrophage-targeted microRNA delivery with dual-responsive polypeptide nanovectors for anti-cancer therapy, Biomaterials source
- Not checked yetcites [156] Li, 2017, Targeted Co-delivery of PTX and TR3 siRNA by PTP peptide modified dendrimer for the treatment of pancreatic cancer, Small
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Additionally, surface decorating active targeting ligands on the vectors should be another effective method to promote targeted accumulation via receptor-mediated recognition.”
§ Non-viral delivery systems for CRISPR/Cas9-based genome editing: challenges and opportunities > 5. Critical obstacles for non-viral delivery of CRISPR/Cas9 system
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:conditional· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✗ Checkable: fails✗ Load-bearing: fails✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
- The authors state this as an assumption: Strategies for facilitating particle accumulation in targeted tissues for non-viral delivery vectors-mediated gene therapy can also be applied to non-viral vectors-mediated CRISPR/Cas9 genome editing.
In the paper
“Liu et al. fabricated pH-responsive poly(D,L-lactic-co-glycolic acid) (PLGA) nanoparticles encapsulating ammonium bicarbonate (NH4HCO3) to trigger antigen release from endo-lysosomes. NH4HCO3 interacted with protons in endo-lysosomes, then produced CO2 and NH3 to disrupt the endo-lysosomes and promote antigen release into the cytosol [183].”
§ Non-viral delivery systems for CRISPR/Cas9-based genome editing: challenges and opportunities > 5. Critical obstacles for non-viral delivery of CRISPR/Cas9 system
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [183] Liu, 2015, pH-responsive poly(D,L-lactic-co-glycolic acid) nanoparticles with rapid antigen release behavior promote immune response, ACS Nano source
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“One underlying mechanism is these peptides undergo a structural transformation from a random coil to an α-helical conformation in lower pH environments, thus promoting endosomal fusion.”
§ Non-viral delivery systems for CRISPR/Cas9-based genome editing: challenges and opportunities > 5. Critical obstacles for non-viral delivery of CRISPR/Cas9 system
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“For CRISPR/Cas9-based plasmids, they need to overcome more barriers than that of CRISPR RNPs and mRNA. They have to enter the nucleus for transcription and traffic back to the cytosol for translation.”
§ Non-viral delivery systems for CRISPR/Cas9-based genome editing: challenges and opportunities > 5. Critical obstacles for non-viral delivery of CRISPR/Cas9 system
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Due to the threshold for rapid renal excretion being about 5.5 nm, the hydrodynamic diameters of the prepared nanoparticles need to be larger than this size [168–170].”
§ Non-viral delivery systems for CRISPR/Cas9-based genome editing: challenges and opportunities > 5. Critical obstacles for non-viral delivery of CRISPR/Cas9 system
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [168] Choi, 2007, Renal clearance of quantum dots, Nat. Biotechnol. source
- Not checked yetcites [169] Longmire, 2008, Clearance properties of nano-sized particles and molecules as imaging agents: considerations and caveats, Nanomedicine (Lond) source
- Not checked yetcites [170] Choi, 2010, Design considerations for tumour-targeted nanoparticles, Nat. Nanotechnol. source
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The fifth encountered obstacle is the phagocytic clearance, blockage of RES in targeted tissues especially in liver and spleen, and the negatively charged components of extracellular matrix.”
§ Non-viral delivery systems for CRISPR/Cas9-based genome editing: challenges and opportunities > 5. Critical obstacles for non-viral delivery of CRISPR/Cas9 system
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Nanoparticles smaller than 9 nm can passively diffuse through nuclear pore complexes (NPCs), while larger ones requiring the assistance of import proteins (e.g., importins) to actively shuttle them into the nucleus [73].”
§ Non-viral delivery systems for CRISPR/Cas9-based genome editing: challenges and opportunities > 5. Critical obstacles for non-viral delivery of CRISPR/Cas9 system
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [73] Pack, 2005, Design and development of polymers for gene delivery, Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. source
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Some studies have shown that hyperthermia can increase the membrane permeability of compounds and enhance cellular uptake. But the temperature and duration of this approach need to be carefully controlled.”
§ Non-viral delivery systems for CRISPR/Cas9-based genome editing: challenges and opportunities > 5. Critical obstacles for non-viral delivery of CRISPR/Cas9 system
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“To balance the effect of penetration and renal excretion, environmental stimuli-responsive size changeable tactics would be a possible compromising solution.”
§ Non-viral delivery systems for CRISPR/Cas9-based genome editing: challenges and opportunities > 5. Critical obstacles for non-viral delivery of CRISPR/Cas9 system
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“It seems like that the cationic lipid-based vectors were one of the most effective delivery approaches for CRISPR/Cas9 system to date. But it is mainly limited to local administration.”
§ Non-viral delivery systems for CRISPR/Cas9-based genome editing: challenges and opportunities > 6. Perspectives
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear? Based: unclearIt may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Meanwhile, different cell types or targeted genes can also affect the efficiency of the CRISPR/Cas9 system [93, 199].”
§ Non-viral delivery systems for CRISPR/Cas9-based genome editing: challenges and opportunities > 6. Perspectives
What the sources say
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“NLSs can be recognized by importin α, the nuclear import receptor, and trigger the subsequent transportation from the cytosol to the nucleus [198].”
§ Non-viral delivery systems for CRISPR/Cas9-based genome editing: challenges and opportunities > 5. Critical obstacles for non-viral delivery of CRISPR/Cas9 system
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [198] Fontes, 2000, Structural basis of recognition of monopartite and bipartite nuclear localization sequences by mammalian importin-α, J. Mol. Biol. source
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Next, the efficiency will also need to be improved for in vivo application, especially in correcting majority of genetic disorders.”
§ Non-viral delivery systems for CRISPR/Cas9-based genome editing: challenges and opportunities > 6. Perspectives
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✗ Checkable: fails✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Moreover, unlike commonly delivery approaches for siRNA or protein, whose action site is in the cytosol, CRISPR/Cas9 systems must be delivered to the nucleus to initiate genome editing in the chromosome.”
§ Non-viral delivery systems for CRISPR/Cas9-based genome editing: challenges and opportunities > 6. Perspectives
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“For the former off-target effects, tissue-specific promoters in CRISPR/Cas9-based plasmid have been introduced into the system to partially solve this problem.”
§ Non-viral delivery systems for CRISPR/Cas9-based genome editing: challenges and opportunities > 6. Perspectives
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:conditional· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Most NLSs are characterized by short basic and cationic peptide sequences.”
§ Non-viral delivery systems for CRISPR/Cas9-based genome editing: challenges and opportunities > 5. Critical obstacles for non-viral delivery of CRISPR/Cas9 system
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“However, the specificity of this technology will need to be further improved to decrease the potential off-target probability for increasing safety.”
§ Non-viral delivery systems for CRISPR/Cas9-based genome editing: challenges and opportunities > 6. Perspectives
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✗ Checkable: fails✓ Load-bearing: passes✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Meanwhile, targeted delivery of CRISPR/Cas9 system by tissue-specific AAV type or non-viral vectors could be another effective solution to this issue.”
§ Non-viral delivery systems for CRISPR/Cas9-based genome editing: challenges and opportunities > 6. Perspectives
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:conditional· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The latter would particularly benefit from non-viral vectors.”
§ Non-viral delivery systems for CRISPR/Cas9-based genome editing: challenges and opportunities > 6. Perspectives
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In addition, proper selection of the targeting site, rational design of sgRNA and using paired Cas9 nickases could be effective approaches to alleviate the latter off-target effects.”
§ Non-viral delivery systems for CRISPR/Cas9-based genome editing: challenges and opportunities > 6. Perspectives
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“These issues may be resolved by enhancing activity and delivery efficiency of the CRISPR-Cas9 system.”
§ Non-viral delivery systems for CRISPR/Cas9-based genome editing: challenges and opportunities > 6. Perspectives
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✗ Checkable: fails✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence.
The authors state this as an assumption.
Strategies for facilitating particle accumulation in targeted tissues for non-viral delivery vectors-mediated gene therapy can also be applied to non-viral vectors-mediated CRISPR/Cas9 genome editing.
“We assume that these strategies can also be applied to non-viral vectors-mediated CRISPR/Cas9 genome editing.”
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Firstly, genome editing components must reach the cell nucleus to achieve therapeutic effects. Thus, extracellular and intracellular barriers need to be overcome, including avoiding enzymatic degradation in the blood, circumventing clearance by the reticuloendothelial system (RES), penetrating cell membranes, escaping endosome entrapment, and infiltrating nuclear membranes.”
From RNA delivery biomaterials for the treatment of genetic and rare diseases (2019) · cites this paper as [208]
In the citing paper
“Secondly, the complexity and large molecular weight of these components are significant challenges for delivery materials.”
From RNA delivery biomaterials for the treatment of genetic and rare diseases (2019) · cites this paper as [208]
In the citing paper
“Thirdly, genome editing components should be delivered to target tissues and edit specific sequences in a controllable manner to prevent off-target events and immune responses.”
From RNA delivery biomaterials for the treatment of genetic and rare diseases (2019) · cites this paper as [208]
In the citing paper
“These materials are similar to those used for mRNA delivery.[202, 205, 207–211]”
From RNA delivery biomaterials for the treatment of genetic and rare diseases (2019) · cites this paper as [208]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.
Zuris study is cited as an unrelated reference
MinorThe text attributes the cochlear genome-editing result to Zuris et al. and cites reference 69, but reference 69 lists Lehrman's article about a gene-therapy death. The bibliography lists the Zuris et al. delivery study as reference 88.
“Zuris et al. injected Cas9:sgRNA complexes targeting GFP gene into the cochlea of transgenic Atoh1-GFP mice. This system resulted in ~20% Cas9-mediated genome modification in hair cells [69].”
“69. Lehrman S Virus treatment questioned after gene therapy death Nature 401 1999 517 518 10524611”
Citations
Cites
1 retracted
Items 201–205 of 205
Nuclear proteins as gene-transfer vectors
Haberland, A., & Böttger, M. (2005) · Biotechnology and Applied Biochemistry · doi:10.1042/ba20050063 · Cited by 24
Castillo (2016) · doi:10.25100/cm.v47i4.2856 · Cited by 18
Physiopathologie du syndrome métabolique
Jullien, D. (2008) · Annales de Dermatologie et de Vénéréologie · doi:10.1016/s0151-9638(08)70542-8 · Cited by 15
Deng, H., Zhao, X., He, D., Guo, W., Yang, K., Dong, A., & Liang, X.-J. (2016) · Chemical Communications · doi:10.1039/c6cc01996j · Cited by 9
Gene editing using CRISPR-Cas9 for the treatment of lung cancer.
Castillo, A. (2016) · PubMed · Cited by 9
Flagged first, then by citations
1 of the 206 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Fang, J., Islam, W., & Maeda, H. (2020) · Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.addr.2020.06.005 · Cited by 757
Emerging blood–brain-barrier-crossing nanotechnology for brain cancer theranostics
Tang, W., Fan, W., Lau, J., Deng, L., Shen, Z., & Chen, X. S. (2019) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/c8cs00805a · Cited by 610
Self-citationRecent advancements in liposome technology
Filipczak, N., Pan, J., Yalamarty, S. S. K., & Torchilin, V. P. (2020) · Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.addr.2020.06.022 · Cited by 611
Wei, T., Cheng, Q., Min, Y.-L., Olson, E. N., & Siegwart, D. J. (2020) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-020-17029-3 · Cited by 615
Base editing: advances and therapeutic opportunities
Porto, E. M., Komor, A. C., Slaymaker, I. M., & Yeo, G. W.-M. (2020) · Nature Reviews Drug Discovery · doi:10.1038/s41573-020-0084-6 · Cited by 495
Metadata
- Authors
- Li, L., Hu, S., & Chen, X.
- Affiliations
- National Institutes of Health (US)
- Central South University (CN)
- Corresponding author
- Hu, Shuo
- Chen, Xiaoyuan
- Venue
- Biomaterials
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2018-07
- Volume
- 171
- Pages
- 207-218
- ISSN
- 0142-9612 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC5944364
- OpenAlex
- W2802060782
- Cited by
- 415
- References
- 206
- Citations by year
- 2026: 31 · 2025: 48 · 2024: 59 · 2023: 64 · 2022: 57 · 2021: 71 · 2020: 43 · 2019: 34 · 2018: 8
- FWCI
- 3.83
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Biomaterials (acceptedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- Funders
- National Natural Science Foundation of China (81771873)
- National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering
- National Institutes of Health
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA Interference and Gene Delivery
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › CRISPR and Genetic Engineering
- Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Biomaterials › Nanoparticle-Based Drug Delivery
- Keywords
- CRISPR/Cas9, genome editing, non-viral delivery, gene delivery vectors, lipid nanoparticles, polymeric nanoparticles, plasmid DNA delivery, mRNA delivery, protein delivery, in vivo delivery, CRISPR therapeutics
- MeSH terms
- Gene Editing, CRISPR-Associated Protein 9, Disease, Viruses, Gene Transfer Techniques, CRISPR-Cas Systems
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-10-10, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).
A second model labelled each claim on 2026-10-10 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review