The DOI matches its Crossref record; 205 of the 206 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; none of the 167 sources its claims cite is checked for support yet.
Non-viral delivery systems for CRISPR/Cas9-based genome editing: Challenges and opportunities
Open accessAbstract
In recent years, CRISPR (clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeat)/Cas (CRISPR-associated) genome editing systems have become one of the most robust platforms in basic biomedical research and therapeutic applications. To date, efficient in vivo delivery of the CRISPR/Cas9 system to the targeted cells remains a challenge. Although viral vectors have been widely used in the delivery of the CRISPR/Cas9 system in vitro and in vivo, their fundamental shortcomings, such as the risk of carcinogenesis, limited insertion size, immune responses and difficulty in large-scale production, severely limit their further applications. Alternative non-viral delivery systems for CRISPR/Cas9 are urgently needed. With the rapid development of non-viral vectors, lipid- or polymer-based nanocarriers have shown great potential for CRISPR/Cas9 delivery. In this review, we analyze the pros and cons of delivering CRISPR/Cas9 systems in the form of plasmid, mRNA, or protein and then discuss the limitations and challenges of CRISPR/Cas9-based genome editing. Furthermore, current non-viral vectors that have been applied for CRISPR/Cas9 delivery in vitro and in vivo are outlined in details. Finally, critical obstacles for non-viral delivery of CRISPR/Cas9 system are highlighted and promising strategies to overcome these barriers are proposed.
Overview
AI snapshot
Written from the paper’s full text.
TL;DR
This review argues that efficient in vivo delivery remains a major hurdle for CRISPR/Cas9 genome editing and that non-viral vectors are promising alternatives to viral vectors despite lower delivery efficiency. It surveys plasmid, mRNA, and protein delivery formats, then outlines non-viral vector examples and extracellular/intracellular barriers to clinical translation.
Key findings
- Non-viral vectors may offer low immunogenicity, absence of endogenous virus recombination, less limitation on large genetic payloads, and ease of large-scale production, but relatively low gene delivery efficiency and transgene expression remain major barriers.
- The review compares three CRISPR/Cas9 delivery formats: plasmid DNA is simple and stable but large (>7 kb total plasmid) and requires nuclear entry; mRNA gives quick, transient expression but has poor stability and possible low efficiency; Cas9/sgRNA ribonucleoprotein gives the swiftest, most transient editing but is difficult to deliver due to Cas9 size (~160 kD) and charge.
- Reported non-viral delivery examples include up to 30% editing in HeLa, HEK-293T, and Raw 264.7 cells with arginine-modified gold nanoparticles; 37% reduction in EGFP expression in CHO cells over 4 days with ZIFs; ~39% editing in AGS cells with GO-PEG-PEI; ~20% Cas9-mediated genome modification in cochlear hair cells after Cas9:sgRNA injection; >6% hepatocyte correction in a hereditary tyrosinemia mouse model; and >97% (mice) or >90% (rats) reduction in serum TTR protein levels with LNP-INT01, with editing persisting at least 12 months.
- The paper highlights barriers including encapsulation difficulty, physiological instability, host immune responses, insufficient targeted accumulation, phagocytic/RES clearance, cellular uptake, endosomal/lysosomal degradation, cytoplasmic mobility, and nuclear import.
Methods
- Design: narrative review of non-viral delivery systems for CRISPR/Cas9-based genome editing, focusing on challenges and opportunities rather than presenting new primary data.
- Data/sample: published literature and selected in vitro and in vivo studies on CRISPR/Cas9 delivery using plasmid, mRNA, or protein formats and non-viral vectors.
- Main analysis: thematic synthesis of delivery formats, non-viral vector examples, disease applications, and extracellular/intracellular delivery barriers, with proposed strategies to overcome them.
Limitations
- The paper states that non-viral vectors face two main in vivo limitations: serum stability of polyplexes after systemic administration and relatively low transfection efficiency in targeted tissues. It also states that non-viral vectors applied in CRISPR/Cas9 delivery remain very few and that cationic lipid-based vectors, though among the most effective to date, are mainly limited to local administration.
- The paper states multiple delivery obstacles: effective encapsulation due to large size and charge properties of Cas9 protein, mRNA, and donor DNA; instability under physiological conditions; host immune responses; insufficient accumulation in target tissues; phagocytic clearance and RES blockage; cellular uptake; endosomal/lysosomal degradation; and cytoplasmic mobility/nuclear import.
- Evident from the text: this is a narrative review with selected examples rather than a systematic review or meta-analysis, so it does not provide quantitative pooled estimates or comprehensive comparative efficacy across all non-viral systems.
Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
82 Not checked yet · 43 Own interpretation · 26 No basis given
In the paper
“This approach allows for robust DNA knock-in in both dividing and non-dividing cells in vitro and in vivo [87].”
§ Non-viral delivery systems for CRISPR/Cas9-based genome editing: challenges and opportunities > 2. Limitations and challenges of CRISPR/Cas9-based genome editing
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [87] Suzuki, 2016, In vivo genome editing via CRISPR/Cas9 mediated homology-independent targeted integration, Nature source
boosteddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“More importantly, the editing levels can persist for at least 12 months, despite the transient nature of the delivery system and the editing components.”
§ Non-viral delivery systems for CRISPR/Cas9-based genome editing: challenges and opportunities > 4. Current non-viral delivery vectors for CRISPR/Cas9 delivery > 4.2 Non-viral vectors in vivo
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [116] Jonathan, 2018, A single administration of CRISPR/Cas9 lipid nanoparticles achieves robust and persistent in vivo genome editing, Cell Rep. source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“In another study, Miller et al. reported a non-viral vector based on zwitterionic amino lipids to deliver Cas9 mRNA and sgRNAs. In contrast to transient therapies, they showed permanent editing of LoxP gene in genetically engineered mice containing a homozygous Rosa26 promoter Lox-Stop-Lox tdTomato (tdTO) cassette after intravenous administration [105].”
§ Non-viral delivery systems for CRISPR/Cas9-based genome editing: challenges and opportunities > 4. Current non-viral delivery vectors for CRISPR/Cas9 delivery > 4.2 Non-viral vectors in vivo
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [105] Miller, 2017, Non-Viral CRISPR/Cas gene editing in vitro and in vivo enabled by synthetic nanoparticle co-delivery of Cas9 mRNA and sgRNA, Angew Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Jiang et al. developed lipid-like nanoparticles for targeted delivery of Cas9 mRNA and sgRNA to the liver. This system achieved disruption of HBV DNA and the proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (pcsk9) gene in vivo [104].”
§ Non-viral delivery systems for CRISPR/Cas9-based genome editing: challenges and opportunities > 4. Current non-viral delivery vectors for CRISPR/Cas9 delivery > 4.2 Non-viral vectors in vivo
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [104] Jiang, 2017, A non-viral CRISPR/Cas9 delivery system for therapeutically targeting HBV DNA and pcsk9 in vivo, Cell Res. source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Zuris et al. injected Cas9:sgRNA complexes targeting GFP gene into the cochlea of transgenic Atoh1-GFP mice. This system resulted in ~20% Cas9-mediated genome modification in hair cells [69].”
§ Non-viral delivery systems for CRISPR/Cas9-based genome editing: challenges and opportunities > 4. Current non-viral delivery vectors for CRISPR/Cas9 delivery > 4.2 Non-viral vectors in vivo
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [69] Lehrman, 1999, Virus treatment questioned after gene therapy death, Nature source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Self-assembled DNA nanoclews were constructed for CRISPR/Cas9-based genome editing system delivery. After being loaded with CRISPR RNPs, these nanoclews enabled efficient target disruption of EGFP gene in vitro and in U2OS.EGFP xenograft tumor models in vivo after intratumoral injection [103].”
§ Non-viral delivery systems for CRISPR/Cas9-based genome editing: challenges and opportunities > 4. Current non-viral delivery vectors for CRISPR/Cas9 delivery > 4.2 Non-viral vectors in vivo
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [103] Sun, 2015, Self-assembled DNA nanoclews for the efficient delivery of CRISPR-Cas9 for genome editing, Angew Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Additionally, unlike viral delivery systems, the synthetic nature of LNP-INT01 allowed for multi-dosing regimens to obtain cumulative editing efficacy without significant changes in cytokine levels or body weight.”
§ Non-viral delivery systems for CRISPR/Cas9-based genome editing: challenges and opportunities > 4. Current non-viral delivery vectors for CRISPR/Cas9 delivery > 4.2 Non-viral vectors in vivo
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [116] Jonathan, 2018, A single administration of CRISPR/Cas9 lipid nanoparticles achieves robust and persistent in vivo genome editing, Cell Rep. source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“With this approach, they edited AAVS1 gene and PTEN gene and achieved effective gene editing efficiency up to 30% in HeLa, HEK-293T and Raw 264.7 cell lines (Fig. 2A) [97].”
§ Non-viral delivery systems for CRISPR/Cas9-based genome editing: challenges and opportunities > 4. Current non-viral delivery vectors for CRISPR/Cas9 delivery > 4.1 Non-viral vectors in vitro and ex vivo
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [97] Mout, 2017, Direct cytosolic delivery of CRISPR/Cas9-ribonucleoprotein for efficient gene editing, ACS Nano source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“After loading with CRISPR/Cas9 targeting polo-like kinase 1 (plk1) gene, LHNPs effectively inhibited U87MG tumor growth [119].”
§ Non-viral delivery systems for CRISPR/Cas9-based genome editing: challenges and opportunities > 4. Current non-viral delivery vectors for CRISPR/Cas9 delivery > 4.2 Non-viral vectors in vivo
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [119] Chen, 2017, Targeted delivery of CRISPR/Cas9-mediated cancer gene therapy via liposome-templated hydrogel nanoparticlesaptation repertoires, Adv. Funct. Mater. source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“In a recent study, graphene oxide-poly(ethylene glycol)-polyethylenimine (GO-PEG-PEI) nanocarrier mediated efficient CRISPR RNPs delivery via physisorption and π-stacking interaction. This strategy induced efficient genome editing in AGS cells with an efficiency of ~39% (Fig. 2D) [102].”
§ Non-viral delivery systems for CRISPR/Cas9-based genome editing: challenges and opportunities > 4. Current non-viral delivery vectors for CRISPR/Cas9 delivery > 4.1 Non-viral vectors in vitro and ex vivo
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [102] Yue, 2018, Graphene oxide-mediated Cas9/sgRNA delivery for efficient genome editing, Nanoscale source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“However, due to the large size of Cas9 protein (~ 160 kD), the positive charge of Cas9 protein and the strong negative charge of sgRNA, the effective delivery of Cas9/sgRNA ribonucleoprotein complexes (RNPs) can be difficult [88–91].”
§ Non-viral delivery systems for CRISPR/Cas9-based genome editing: challenges and opportunities > 3. Modes of CRISPR/Cas9 delivery
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [88] Zuris, 2015, Cationic lipid-mediated delivery of proteins enables efficient protein-based genome editing in vitro and in vivo, Nat. Biotechnol. source
- Not checked yetcites [89] Subburaj, 2016, Site-directed mutagenesis in Petunia x hybrida protoplast system using direct delivery of purified recombinant Cas9 ribonucleoproteins, Plant Cell Rep. source
- Not checked yetcites [90] Woo, 2015, DNA-free genome editing in plants with preassembled CRISPR-Cas9 ribonucleoproteins, Nat. Biotechnol. source
- Not checked yetcites [91] Schumann, 2015, Generation of knock-in primary human T cells using Cas9 ribonucleoproteins, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In principle, this format enables the swiftest genome editing as there is no need for transcription and/or translation.”
§ Non-viral delivery systems for CRISPR/Cas9-based genome editing: challenges and opportunities > 3. Modes of CRISPR/Cas9 delivery
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“With the rapid development of non-viral vectors, lipid- or polymer-based nanocarriers have shown great potential for CRISPR/Cas9 delivery.”
§ Non-viral delivery systems for CRISPR/Cas9-based genome editing: challenges and opportunities > Abstract
boostedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: unclear — It is unclear why the paper says it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Especially, AAV can be flexibly constructed to target specific organs or tissues based on the diverse tissue tropism of AAV serotypes [66, 67].”
§ Non-viral delivery systems for CRISPR/Cas9-based genome editing: challenges and opportunities > 1. Introduction
What the sources say
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“So far, relatively low gene delivery efficiency and transgene expression have been the major barriers in non-viral vectors-based gene therapy [76, 77].”
§ Non-viral delivery systems for CRISPR/Cas9-based genome editing: challenges and opportunities > 1. Introduction
What the sources say
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“To date, efficient in vivo delivery of the CRISPR/Cas9 system to the targeted cells remains a challenge.”
- Also stated in: § 1. Introduction · hedged
“Despite the aforementioned merits, efficient delivery may likely become the main hurdle in the eventual application and clinical translation of CRISPR/Cas9 system.”
- Also stated in: § 2. Limitations and challenges of CRISPR/Cas9-based genome editing · plain
“Meanwhile, achieving efficient delivery of CRISPR system into particular cell types, tissues or organs for therapeutic benefit is another main ongoing challenge.”
§ Non-viral delivery systems for CRISPR/Cas9-based genome editing: challenges and opportunities > Abstract
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Also stated in: § 1. Introduction · hedged
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“In recent years, viral vectors have been extensively applied to deliver CRISPR cassettes in vitro and in vivo largely owing to their high efficiency in gene delivery and long-term stable transgene expression [34, 58, 65].”
§ Non-viral delivery systems for CRISPR/Cas9-based genome editing: challenges and opportunities > 1. Introduction
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [34] Heckl, 2014, Generation of mouse models of myeloid malignancy with combinatorial genetic lesions using CRISPR-Cas9 genome editing, Nat. Biotechnol. source
- Not checked yetcites [58] Yu, 2017, Nrl knockdown by AAV-delivered CRISPR/Cas9 prevents retinal degeneration in mice, Nat. Commun. source
- Not checked yetcites [65] Shalem, 2014, Genome-scale CRISPR-Cas9 knockout screening in human cells, Science source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“In addition, CRISPR/Cas9 system has shown potentials in polygenetic diseases, such as cancer, by inhibiting oncogene expression or deactivating oncogenic virus [52–55].”
§ Non-viral delivery systems for CRISPR/Cas9-based genome editing: challenges and opportunities > 1. Introduction
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [52] Xiao-Jie, 2015, CRISPR-Cas9: a new and promising player in gene therapy, J. Med. Genet. source
- Not checked yetcites [53] Sanchez-Rivera, 2015, Applications of the CRISPR-Cas9 system in cancer biology, Nat. Rev. Cancer source
- Not checked yetcites [54] Castillo, 2016, Gene editing using CRISPR-Cas9 for the treatment of lung cancer, Colomb. Med. (Cali.) source
- Not checked yetcites [55] Maddalo, 2014, In vivo engineering of oncogenic chromosomal rearrangements with the CRISPR/Cas9 system, Nature source
plainconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Unfortunately, although physical approaches are often successful in the laboratory, these methods are not very amenable for clinical translation.”
§ Non-viral delivery systems for CRISPR/Cas9-based genome editing: challenges and opportunities > 1. Introduction
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Overexpression of drug resistance-associated genes, such as P-gp and Bcl-2, is one of the most consistent alterations in multidrug resistant cells [131–134].”
§ Non-viral delivery systems for CRISPR/Cas9-based genome editing: challenges and opportunities > 4. Current non-viral delivery vectors for CRISPR/Cas9 delivery > 4.2 Non-viral vectors in vivo
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [131] Borst, 2000, A family of drug transporters: the multidrug resistance-associated proteins, J. Natl. Cancer Inst. source
- Not checked yetcites [132] Thomas, 2003, Overcoming multidrug resistance in cancer: an update on the clinical strategy of inhibiting p-glycoprotein, Cancer Control source
- Not checked yetcites [133] Czabotar, 2014, Control of apoptosis by the BCL-2 protein family: implications for physiology and therapy, Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. source
- Not checked yetcites [134] Delbridge, 2016, Thirty years of BCL-2: translating cell death discoveries into novel cancer therapies, Nat. Rev. Cancer source
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Additionally, due to the instability of the genome of cancer cells, they have evolved many mechanisms to escape CRISPR/Cas9-mediated genome editing, such as mutation of the PAM sequence and the recognition site etc. [120–122].”
§ Non-viral delivery systems for CRISPR/Cas9-based genome editing: challenges and opportunities > 4. Current non-viral delivery vectors for CRISPR/Cas9 delivery > 4.2 Non-viral vectors in vivo
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [120] Negrini, 2010, Genomic instability–an evolving hallmark of cancer, Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. source
- Not checked yetcites [121] Shen, 2011, Genomic instability and cancer: an introduction, J. Mol. Cell Biol. source
- Not checked yetcites [122] Tubbs, 2017, Endogenous DNA damage as a source of genomic instability in cancer, Cell source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Most recently, dCas9 fusion proteins-mediated CRISPRi, such as dCas9-KRAB (Krüppel-associated box) and dCas9-LSD1 (lysine-specific histone demethylase 1) system, has been introduced [125–127].”
§ Non-viral delivery systems for CRISPR/Cas9-based genome editing: challenges and opportunities > 4. Current non-viral delivery vectors for CRISPR/Cas9 delivery > 4.2 Non-viral vectors in vivo
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [125] Thakore, 2015, Highly specific epigenome editing by CRISPR-Cas9 repressors for silencing of distal regulatory elements, Nat. Methods source
- Not checked yetcites [126] Mandegar, 2016, CRISPR interference efficiently induces specific and reversible gene silencing in human iPSCs, Cell Stem Cell source
- Not checked yetcites [127] Kearns, 2015, Functional annotation of native enhancers with a Cas9-histone demethylase fusion, Nat. Methods source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Even more problematic is that the genome editing efficiency of CRISPR/Cas9 system is not high enough under the current conditions.”
§ Non-viral delivery systems for CRISPR/Cas9-based genome editing: challenges and opportunities > 4. Current non-viral delivery vectors for CRISPR/Cas9 delivery > 4.2 Non-viral vectors in vivo
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Collectively, using non-viral vectors for in vivo delivery of CRISPR/Cas9 system has shown great potential for monogenic disorders treatment.”
§ Non-viral delivery systems for CRISPR/Cas9-based genome editing: challenges and opportunities > 4. Current non-viral delivery vectors for CRISPR/Cas9 delivery > 4.2 Non-viral vectors in vivo
plainconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“However, the large genetic size of Cas9 (~ 4.5 kb) and the total plasmid size (> 7 kb) significantly increase the difficulty of delivery and expression of CRISPR/Cas9 systems [94].”
§ Non-viral delivery systems for CRISPR/Cas9-based genome editing: challenges and opportunities > 3. Modes of CRISPR/Cas9 delivery
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [94] Ran, 2015, In vivo genome editing using Staphylococcus aureus Cas9, Nature source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“However, the efficient in vivo delivery of CRISPR/Cas9 systems is nontrivial due to the increased number of barriers under physiological conditions.”
§ Non-viral delivery systems for CRISPR/Cas9-based genome editing: challenges and opportunities > 4. Current non-viral delivery vectors for CRISPR/Cas9 delivery > 4.1 Non-viral vectors in vitro and ex vivo
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Acquired drug resistance is the major cause of chemotherapy-based cancer treatment failure [129, 130].”
§ Non-viral delivery systems for CRISPR/Cas9-based genome editing: challenges and opportunities > 4. Current non-viral delivery vectors for CRISPR/Cas9 delivery > 4.2 Non-viral vectors in vivo
What the sources say
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In the meantime, many non-viral vectors have also been rapidly developed for this purpose.”
§ Non-viral delivery systems for CRISPR/Cas9-based genome editing: challenges and opportunities > 4. Current non-viral delivery vectors for CRISPR/Cas9 delivery > 4.1 Non-viral vectors in vitro and ex vivo
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Additionally, the relatively poor stability of Cas9 mRNA is also an important obstacle for this type of delivery strategy.”
§ Non-viral delivery systems for CRISPR/Cas9-based genome editing: challenges and opportunities > 3. Modes of CRISPR/Cas9 delivery
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Moreover, the integration of plasmid into the host genome can be another risk.”
§ Non-viral delivery systems for CRISPR/Cas9-based genome editing: challenges and opportunities > 3. Modes of CRISPR/Cas9 delivery
plainconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“The third option is the plasmid-based CRISPR/Cas9 system [93]. This is an appealing delivery approach owing to the simplicity and low cost of manipulation.”
§ Non-viral delivery systems for CRISPR/Cas9-based genome editing: challenges and opportunities > 3. Modes of CRISPR/Cas9 delivery
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [93] Ran, 2013, Genome engineering using the CRISPR-Cas9 system, Nat. Protoc. source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Non-viral vectors-mediated transient expression of CRISPR/Cas9 system may be an effective approach to alleviate this problem.”
§ Non-viral delivery systems for CRISPR/Cas9-based genome editing: challenges and opportunities > 4. Current non-viral delivery vectors for CRISPR/Cas9 delivery > 4.2 Non-viral vectors in vivo
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: unclear — It is unclear why the paper says it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Many reports have demonstrated that epigenetic alterations play important roles in driving cancer initiation and progression [123, 124].”
§ Non-viral delivery systems for CRISPR/Cas9-based genome editing: challenges and opportunities > 4. Current non-viral delivery vectors for CRISPR/Cas9 delivery > 4.2 Non-viral vectors in vivo
What the sources say
boosteddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Thus, the cationic lipids or polymers widely used to encapsulate negatively charged proteins based on electrostatic interaction cannot be applied to deliver the native form of Cas9 protein.”
§ Non-viral delivery systems for CRISPR/Cas9-based genome editing: challenges and opportunities > 5. Critical obstacles for non-viral delivery of CRISPR/Cas9 system
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“On the other hand, cationic non-viral vectors used to condense negatively charged CRISPR RNPs and plasmids are prone to interact with plasma proteins and the physiological salt in physiological conditions, resulting in the recognition and clearance by the reticuloendothelial system (RES) [141–143].”
§ Non-viral delivery systems for CRISPR/Cas9-based genome editing: challenges and opportunities > 5. Critical obstacles for non-viral delivery of CRISPR/Cas9 system
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [141] Li, 2015, Polymeric nanocarriers for non-viral gene delivery, J. Biomed. Nanotechnol. source
- Not checked yetcites [142] Dash, 1999, Factors affecting blood clearance and in vivo distribution of polyelectrolyte complexes for gene delivery, Gene Ther. source
- Not checked yetcites [143] Xu, 2011, Drug delivery trends in clinical trials and translational medicine: challenges and opportunities in the delivery of nucleic acid-based therapeutics, J. Pharmacol. Sci. source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“However, the accompanying decreased cellular uptake after PEGylation cannot be neglected.”
§ Non-viral delivery systems for CRISPR/Cas9-based genome editing: challenges and opportunities > 5. Critical obstacles for non-viral delivery of CRISPR/Cas9 system
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“For example, as a unique feature of solid tumors, the enhanced permeability and retention (EPR) effect can be exploited to promote particles accumulation into tumors.”
§ Non-viral delivery systems for CRISPR/Cas9-based genome editing: challenges and opportunities > 5. Critical obstacles for non-viral delivery of CRISPR/Cas9 system
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- The authors state this as an assumption: Strategies for facilitating particle accumulation in targeted tissues for non-viral delivery vectors-mediated gene therapy can also be applied to non-viral vectors-mediated CRISPR/Cas9 genome editing.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Encapsulating these elements in the interior of the vectors would significantly prevent this recognition and subsequent clearance.”
§ Non-viral delivery systems for CRISPR/Cas9-based genome editing: challenges and opportunities > 5. Critical obstacles for non-viral delivery of CRISPR/Cas9 system
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“However, some reports also demonstrated the generation of PEG-specific antibodies after administration of PEG-coated liposomes [153, 154].”
§ Non-viral delivery systems for CRISPR/Cas9-based genome editing: challenges and opportunities > 5. Critical obstacles for non-viral delivery of CRISPR/Cas9 system
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [153] Ishida, 2007, PEGylated liposomes elicit an anti-PEG IgM response in a T cell-independent manner, J. Control Release source
- Not checked yetcites [154] Wang, 2007, Anti-PEG IgM elicited by injection of liposomes is involved in the enhanced blood clearance of a subsequent dose of PEGylated liposomes, J. Control Release source
boosteddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Generally, after being sheltered by non-viral vectors, the recognition by the host immune system would be reduced to some extent.”
§ Non-viral delivery systems for CRISPR/Cas9-based genome editing: challenges and opportunities > 5. Critical obstacles for non-viral delivery of CRISPR/Cas9 system
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The fourth obstacle is the insufficient accumulation of non-viral vector-mediated CRISPR/Cas9 systems in the targeted tissues.”
§ Non-viral delivery systems for CRISPR/Cas9-based genome editing: challenges and opportunities > 5. Critical obstacles for non-viral delivery of CRISPR/Cas9 system
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Like other gene therapy strategies, environmental stimuli-triggered detachment may be a feasible solution to this problem [146].”
§ Non-viral delivery systems for CRISPR/Cas9-based genome editing: challenges and opportunities > 5. Critical obstacles for non-viral delivery of CRISPR/Cas9 system
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [146] Kuai, 2011, Targeted delivery of cargoes into a murine solid tumor by a cell-penetrating peptide and cleavable poly(ethylene glycol) comodified liposomal delivery system via systemic administration, Mol. Pharm. source
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Due to the permanent gene editing effect of CRISPR/Cas9 systems in chromosome, the daughter cells will inherit the edited gene sequences of the mother cells.”
§ Non-viral delivery systems for CRISPR/Cas9-based genome editing: challenges and opportunities > 4. Current non-viral delivery vectors for CRISPR/Cas9 delivery > 4.2 Non-viral vectors in vivo
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Similar to the protein form, Cas9 mRNA and DNA (~ 4.5 kb) also exhibit large size, which increases the difficulty of efficient encapsulation.”
§ Non-viral delivery systems for CRISPR/Cas9-based genome editing: challenges and opportunities > 5. Critical obstacles for non-viral delivery of CRISPR/Cas9 system
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“The first obstacle is effective encapsulation of the editing tools in delivery vectors due to the large size and different charge properties of Cas9 protein, mRNA and donor DNA.”
§ Non-viral delivery systems for CRISPR/Cas9-based genome editing: challenges and opportunities > 5. Critical obstacles for non-viral delivery of CRISPR/Cas9 system
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [89] Subburaj, 2016, Site-directed mutagenesis in Petunia x hybrida protoplast system using direct delivery of purified recombinant Cas9 ribonucleoproteins, Plant Cell Rep. source
- Not checked yetcites [88] Zuris, 2015, Cationic lipid-mediated delivery of proteins enables efficient protein-based genome editing in vitro and in vivo, Nat. Biotechnol. source
- Not checked yetcites [97] Mout, 2017, Direct cytosolic delivery of CRISPR/Cas9-ribonucleoprotein for efficient gene editing, ACS Nano source
- Not checked yetcites [103] Sun, 2015, Self-assembled DNA nanoclews for the efficient delivery of CRISPR-Cas9 for genome editing, Angew Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. source
- Not checked yetcites [139] Jinek, 2014, Structures of Cas9 endonucleases reveal RNA-mediated conformational activation, Science source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Some reports have demonstrated that EPR effect can provide 20–30% increase in delivery compared with critical normal organs [157].”
§ Non-viral delivery systems for CRISPR/Cas9-based genome editing: challenges and opportunities > 5. Critical obstacles for non-viral delivery of CRISPR/Cas9 system
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [157] Kobayashi, 2013, Improving conventional enhanced permeability and retention (EPR) effects; what is the appropriate target?, Theranostics source
boosteddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Besides, in contrast with viral vectors, cumulative editing efficacy can be obtained after multiple administrations of non-viral vectors-mediated CRISPR/Cas9 delivery owing to limited immune responses [73, 74, 116, 138].”
§ Non-viral delivery systems for CRISPR/Cas9-based genome editing: challenges and opportunities > 4. Current non-viral delivery vectors for CRISPR/Cas9 delivery > 4.2 Non-viral vectors in vivo
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [73] Pack, 2005, Design and development of polymers for gene delivery, Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. source
- Not checked yetcites [74] Li, 2007, Non-viral is superior to viral gene delivery, J. Control Release source
- Not checked yetcites [116] Jonathan, 2018, A single administration of CRISPR/Cas9 lipid nanoparticles achieves robust and persistent in vivo genome editing, Cell Rep. source
- Not checked yetcites [138] Yin, 2014, Non-viral vectors for gene-based therapy, Nat. Rev. Genet. source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The third obstacle is the host immune responses triggered by the elements of CRISPR/Cas9 system, which is derived from bacteria.”
§ Non-viral delivery systems for CRISPR/Cas9-based genome editing: challenges and opportunities > 5. Critical obstacles for non-viral delivery of CRISPR/Cas9 system
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Despite all these, the immunogenicity of non-viral vectors is still considered to be much lower than that of viral vectors [74].”
§ Non-viral delivery systems for CRISPR/Cas9-based genome editing: challenges and opportunities > 5. Critical obstacles for non-viral delivery of CRISPR/Cas9 system
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [74] Li, 2007, Non-viral is superior to viral gene delivery, J. Control Release source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Manipulating drug resistance-associated genes using CRISPR/Cas9 systems together with chemotherapy may be a preferable approach to cancer treatment over conventional combination therapy.”
§ Non-viral delivery systems for CRISPR/Cas9-based genome editing: challenges and opportunities > 4. Current non-viral delivery vectors for CRISPR/Cas9 delivery > 4.2 Non-viral vectors in vivo
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: unclear — It is unclear whether it could be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Attaching PEG or other hydrophilic polymers to the surface of the nanoparticles can partially shield them from immune recognition [151, 152].”
§ Non-viral delivery systems for CRISPR/Cas9-based genome editing: challenges and opportunities > 5. Critical obstacles for non-viral delivery of CRISPR/Cas9 system
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [151] Moghimi, 2002, Chemical camouflage of nanospheres with a poorly reactive surface: towards development of stealth and target-specific nanocarriers, Biochim. Biophys. Acta source
- Not checked yetcites [152] Haque, 2016, Combination strategy of multi-layered surface camouflage using hyperbranched polyethylene glycol and immunosuppressive drugs for the prevention of immune reactions against transplanted porcine islets, Biomaterials source
plainconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“However, it is also worth noting that partial shielding via simple electrostatic interaction may not be effective enough to eliminate the recognition by host immune cells owing to the exposure of neutral domains of these elements.”
§ Non-viral delivery systems for CRISPR/Cas9-based genome editing: challenges and opportunities > 5. Critical obstacles for non-viral delivery of CRISPR/Cas9 system
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“The conventional strategy is to inhibit the expression or activity of these genes through small interfering RNA (siRNA) or chemical inhibitors [135–137].”
§ Non-viral delivery systems for CRISPR/Cas9-based genome editing: challenges and opportunities > 4. Current non-viral delivery vectors for CRISPR/Cas9 delivery > 4.2 Non-viral vectors in vivo
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [135] He, 2014, Nanoscale metal-organic frameworks for the co-delivery of cisplatin and pooled siRNAs to enhance therapeutic efficacy in drug-resistant ovarian cancer cells, J. Am. Chem. Soc. source
- Not checked yetcites [136] Li, 2014, Co-delivery of siRNAs and anti-cancer drugs using layered double hydroxide nanoparticles, Biomaterials source
- Not checked yetcites [137] Huang, 2017, Nanomedicine-based combination anticancer therapy between nucleic acids and small-molecular drugs, Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Additionally, the properties such as size, surface charge, hydrophobicity/hydrophilicity, and the steric effects of particle coating have influence on the compatibility of nanoparticles with the immune system [147–150].”
§ Non-viral delivery systems for CRISPR/Cas9-based genome editing: challenges and opportunities > 5. Critical obstacles for non-viral delivery of CRISPR/Cas9 system
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [147] Zolnik, 2010, Nanoparticles and the immune system, Endocrinology source
- Not checked yetcites [148] Dobrovolskaia, 2008, Preclinical studies to understand nanoparticle interaction with the immune system and its potential effects on nanoparticle biodistribution, Mol. Pharm. source
- Not checked yetcites [149] Dobrovolskaia, 2007, Immunological properties of engineered nanomaterials, Nat. Nanotechnol. source
- Not checked yetcites [150] Aggarwal, 2009, Nanoparticle interaction with plasma proteins as it relates to particle biodistribution, biocompatibility and therapeutic efficacy, Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The second obstacle is the stability of complex under physiological conditions.”
§ Non-viral delivery systems for CRISPR/Cas9-based genome editing: challenges and opportunities > 5. Critical obstacles for non-viral delivery of CRISPR/Cas9 system
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“It is worth noting that formation of specific antibodies against nanoparticles may affect the efficacy and the safety of nanoparticle-based therapeutics [149, 150].”
§ Non-viral delivery systems for CRISPR/Cas9-based genome editing: challenges and opportunities > 5. Critical obstacles for non-viral delivery of CRISPR/Cas9 system
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [149] Dobrovolskaia, 2007, Immunological properties of engineered nanomaterials, Nat. Nanotechnol. source
- Not checked yetcites [150] Aggarwal, 2009, Nanoparticle interaction with plasma proteins as it relates to particle biodistribution, biocompatibility and therapeutic efficacy, Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. source
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Inspired by the active transportation process of proteins to nucleus, nuclear localization sequences (NLSs) have been introduced into the vectors to facilitate transportation to nucleus [195–197].”
§ Non-viral delivery systems for CRISPR/Cas9-based genome editing: challenges and opportunities > 5. Critical obstacles for non-viral delivery of CRISPR/Cas9 system
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [195] Haberland, 2005, Nuclear proteins as gene-transfer vectors, Biotechnol. Appl. Biochem. source
- Not checked yetcites [196] Chen, 2017, A gene delivery system containing nuclear localization signal: increased nucleus import and transfection efficiency with the assistance of RanGAP1, Acta Biomater. source
- Not checked yetcites [197] Maity, 2016, Efficient subcellular targeting to the cell nucleus of Quantum Dots densely decorated with a nuclear localization sequence peptide, ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Briefly, 2° and 3° amines on polymer chains can be protonated inside endo-lysosomes and then counterbalance chloride ions flow into the vesicles. This process creates an osmotic gradient between the exterior and interior of the endo-lysosomes, leading to swelling and bursting of these vesicles and releasing the polyplex into the cytosol [178].”
§ Non-viral delivery systems for CRISPR/Cas9-based genome editing: challenges and opportunities > 5. Critical obstacles for non-viral delivery of CRISPR/Cas9 system
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [178] Behr, 1997, The proton sponge: a trick to enter cells the viruses did not exploit, Chim. Int. J. Chem. source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Smaller-sized nanoparticles may be preferred to enhance permeability and penetration over large-sized ones [166, 167].”
§ Non-viral delivery systems for CRISPR/Cas9-based genome editing: challenges and opportunities > 5. Critical obstacles for non-viral delivery of CRISPR/Cas9 system
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [166] Dong, 2017, Microfluidic preparation of drug-loaded PEGylated liposomes, and the impact of liposome size on tumour retention and penetration, J. Liposome Res.
- Not checked yetcites [167] Sun, 2017, Enhancing tumor penetration of nanomedicines, Biomacromolecules source
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“CRISPR/Cas9 system must be delivered to the nucleus to initiate genome editing effect.”
§ Non-viral delivery systems for CRISPR/Cas9-based genome editing: challenges and opportunities > 5. Critical obstacles for non-viral delivery of CRISPR/Cas9 system
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Cytoplasmic mobility and nuclear import is another big obstacle in the intracellular environment.”
§ Non-viral delivery systems for CRISPR/Cas9-based genome editing: challenges and opportunities > 5. Critical obstacles for non-viral delivery of CRISPR/Cas9 system
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In addition to cellular uptake, endosomal and lysosomal degradation is also a critical challenge for efficient CRISPR/Cas9 delivery due to the acidic environment (pH 5.0–6.2) and hydrolases.”
§ Non-viral delivery systems for CRISPR/Cas9-based genome editing: challenges and opportunities > 5. Critical obstacles for non-viral delivery of CRISPR/Cas9 system
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In principle, naked CRISPR plasmid and sgRNA cannot directly transport through the lipid bilayer of the cell membrane due to the hydrophilic and anionic properties.”
§ Non-viral delivery systems for CRISPR/Cas9-based genome editing: challenges and opportunities > 5. Critical obstacles for non-viral delivery of CRISPR/Cas9 system
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“However, smaller-sized nanoparticles can also be rapidly cleared from the systemic circulation through the kidneys.”
§ Non-viral delivery systems for CRISPR/Cas9-based genome editing: challenges and opportunities > 5. Critical obstacles for non-viral delivery of CRISPR/Cas9 system
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“A variety of non-viral vectors, including but not limited to polyethylenimine (PEI), poly[2-(dimethylamino) ethyl methacrylate] (PDMAEMA), have “proton-sponge effect”.”
§ Non-viral delivery systems for CRISPR/Cas9-based genome editing: challenges and opportunities > 5. Critical obstacles for non-viral delivery of CRISPR/Cas9 system
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“In fact, direct transmembrane delivery of the particles into the cytosol bypassing the endo-lysosomes may be an alternative way [187, 188].”
§ Non-viral delivery systems for CRISPR/Cas9-based genome editing: challenges and opportunities > 5. Critical obstacles for non-viral delivery of CRISPR/Cas9 system
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [187] Deng, 2016, One-step gene delivery into the cytoplasm in a fusion-dependent manner based on a new membrane fusogenic lipid, Chem. Commun. (Camb) source
- Not checked yetcites [188] Tang, 2013, Direct delivery of functional proteins and enzymes to the cytosol using nanoparticle-stabilized nanocapsules, ACS Nano source
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Non-viral vectors that compact plasmid into small particles may aid the movement to the nucleus.”
§ Non-viral delivery systems for CRISPR/Cas9-based genome editing: challenges and opportunities > 5. Critical obstacles for non-viral delivery of CRISPR/Cas9 system
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Virus such as herpes simplex virus and some serotypes of adenovirus could travel through the cytoplasm via microtubule-mediated transport [76, 193, 194].”
§ Non-viral delivery systems for CRISPR/Cas9-based genome editing: challenges and opportunities > 5. Critical obstacles for non-viral delivery of CRISPR/Cas9 system
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [76] Mintzer, 2009, Nonviral vectors for gene delivery, Chem. Rev. source
- Not checked yetcites [193] Sodeik, 1997, Microtubule-mediated transport of incoming herpes simplex virus 1 capsids to the nucleus, J. Cell Biol. source
- Not checked yetcites [194] Leopold, 2000, Dynein- and microtubule-mediated translocation of adenovirus serotype 5 occurs after endosomal lysis, Hum. Gene Ther. source
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Recently, gas-generating nanoparticles have also been designed to boost endo-lysosomal escape in some studies.”
§ Non-viral delivery systems for CRISPR/Cas9-based genome editing: challenges and opportunities > 5. Critical obstacles for non-viral delivery of CRISPR/Cas9 system
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Meanwhile, some compounds, such as chloroquine, imidazole, and zinc chloride, have also been combined with cationic vectors to further enhance endosomal escape [179–182].”
§ Non-viral delivery systems for CRISPR/Cas9-based genome editing: challenges and opportunities > 5. Critical obstacles for non-viral delivery of CRISPR/Cas9 system
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [179] Hughes, 1996, Evaluation of adjuvants that enhance the effectiveness of antisense oligodeoxynucleotides, Pharm. Res. source
- Not checked yetcites [180] Varkouhi, 2011, Endosomal escape pathways for delivery of biologicals, J. Control Release source
- Not checked yetcites [181] Pichon, 2002, Zinc improves gene transfer mediated by DNA/cationic polymer complexes, J. Gene Med. source
- Not checked yetcites [182] Cho, 2003, Polycation gene delivery systems: escape from endosomes to cytosol, J. Pharm. Pharmacol. source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“In addition, inspired by the mechanism of viral infection, some membrane fusion peptides, such as GALA peptides and acid-activatable melittin, have been introduced into non-viral vectors to facilitate endosomal escape [184–186].”
§ Non-viral delivery systems for CRISPR/Cas9-based genome editing: challenges and opportunities > 5. Critical obstacles for non-viral delivery of CRISPR/Cas9 system
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [184] Li, 2004, GALA: a designed synthetic pH-responsive amphipathic peptide with applications in drug and gene delivery, Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. source
- Not checked yetcites [185] Hou, 2013, Mechanisms of nanoparticle-mediated siRNA transfection by melittin-derived peptides, ACS Nano source
- Not checked yetcites [186] Moore, 2008, The effect of endosomal escape peptides on in vitro gene delivery of polyethylene glycol-based vehicles, J. Gene Med. source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Cellular uptake is the next obstacle owing to the selective transmission of the hydrophobic and negatively charged plasma membrane.”
§ Non-viral delivery systems for CRISPR/Cas9-based genome editing: challenges and opportunities > 5. Critical obstacles for non-viral delivery of CRISPR/Cas9 system
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Disruption or reorganization of the actin cytoskeleton, or depletion of keratin and vimentin in cells, significantly increases the diffusion of gene payloads [190–192].”
§ Non-viral delivery systems for CRISPR/Cas9-based genome editing: challenges and opportunities > 5. Critical obstacles for non-viral delivery of CRISPR/Cas9 system
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [190] Lechardeur, 2006, Nucleocytoplasmic transport of plasmid DNA: a perilous journey from the cytoplasm to the nucleus, Hum. Gene Ther. source
- Not checked yetcites [191] Dauty, 2005, Actin cytoskeleton as the principal determinant of size-dependent DNA mobility in cytoplasm: a new barrier for non-viral gene delivery, J. Biol. Chem. source
- Not checked yetcites [192] Geiger, 2006, Cyclic stretch-induced reorganization of the cytoskeleton and its role in enhanced gene transfer, Gene Ther. source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Cationic polyplexes could move along microtubules by non-specifically interacting with anionic microtubules or motor proteins [76].”
§ Non-viral delivery systems for CRISPR/Cas9-based genome editing: challenges and opportunities > 5. Critical obstacles for non-viral delivery of CRISPR/Cas9 system
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [76] Mintzer, 2009, Nonviral vectors for gene delivery, Chem. Rev. source
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Additionally, ultrasound has also been implicated as a potential approach to promote cell entry owing to ultrasound-induced mild hyperthermia and cell membrane deformation [176, 177].”
§ Non-viral delivery systems for CRISPR/Cas9-based genome editing: challenges and opportunities > 5. Critical obstacles for non-viral delivery of CRISPR/Cas9 system
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [176] Cho, 2002, Ultrasound-induced mild hyperthermia as a novel approach to increase drug uptake in brain microvessel endothelial cells, Pharm. Res. source
- Not checked yetcites [177] Wang, 2010, Low-intensity pulsed ultrasound increases cellular uptake of superparamagnetic iron oxide nanomaterial: results from human osteosarcoma cell line U2OS, J. Magn. Reson. Imag. source
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The “proton-sponge effect” of polymers with proton buffer capacity can be exploited to promote endo-lysosomal escape.”
§ Non-viral delivery systems for CRISPR/Cas9-based genome editing: challenges and opportunities > 5. Critical obstacles for non-viral delivery of CRISPR/Cas9 system
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Some auxiliary means, such as topical hyperthermia, radiotherapy and high intensity focused ultrasound, etc., can also be used to enhance this effect [158–160].”
§ Non-viral delivery systems for CRISPR/Cas9-based genome editing: challenges and opportunities > 5. Critical obstacles for non-viral delivery of CRISPR/Cas9 system
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [158] Kong, 2000, Hyperthermia enables tumor-specific nanoparticle delivery: effect of particle size, Cancer Res.
- Not checked yetcites [159] Lammers, 2007, Effect of radiotherapy and hyperthermia on the tumor accumulation of HPMA copolymer-based drug delivery systems, J. Control Release source
- Not checked yetcites [160] Ranjan, 2012, Image-guided drug delivery with magnetic resonance guided high intensity focused ultrasound and temperature sensitive liposomes in a rabbit Vx2 tumor model, J. Control Release source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- The authors state this as an assumption: Strategies for facilitating particle accumulation in targeted tissues for non-viral delivery vectors-mediated gene therapy can also be applied to non-viral vectors-mediated CRISPR/Cas9 genome editing.
In the paper
“Once released into the cytosol, non-viral vectors loaded with CRISPR/Cas9 system need to overcome additional barriers in the cytosol, including the mesh-like cytoskeleton and nucleolytic enzymes within the cytosolic milieu [190].”
§ Non-viral delivery systems for CRISPR/Cas9-based genome editing: challenges and opportunities > 5. Critical obstacles for non-viral delivery of CRISPR/Cas9 system
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [190] Lechardeur, 2006, Nucleocytoplasmic transport of plasmid DNA: a perilous journey from the cytoplasm to the nucleus, Hum. Gene Ther. source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Besides, for the fibrotic lesion, degradation of the extracellular matrix using collagenase or hyaluronidase can be effective strategies to enhance accumulation [161, 162].”
§ Non-viral delivery systems for CRISPR/Cas9-based genome editing: challenges and opportunities > 5. Critical obstacles for non-viral delivery of CRISPR/Cas9 system
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [161] Eikenes, 2004, Collagenase increases the transcapillary pressure gradient and improves the uptake and distribution of monoclonal antibodies in human osteosarcoma xenografts, Cancer Res. source
- Not checked yetcites [162] Eikenes, 2005, Hyaluronidase induces a transcapillary pressure gradient and improves the distribution and uptake of liposomal doxorubicin (Caelyx) in human osteosarcoma xenografts, Br. J. Cancer source
plainconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- The authors state this as an assumption: Strategies for facilitating particle accumulation in targeted tissues for non-viral delivery vectors-mediated gene therapy can also be applied to non-viral vectors-mediated CRISPR/Cas9 genome editing.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Besides, cell penetrating peptides (CPP), such as TAT and R8 peptide, have also been extensively used to facilitate cell entry based on the positive charge and amphipathic in nature [174, 175].”
§ Non-viral delivery systems for CRISPR/Cas9-based genome editing: challenges and opportunities > 5. Critical obstacles for non-viral delivery of CRISPR/Cas9 system
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [174] Torchilin, 2008, Tat peptide-mediated intracellular delivery of pharmaceutical nanocarriers, Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. source
- Not checked yetcites [175] Torchilin, 2008, Cell penetrating peptide-modified pharmaceutical nanocarriers for intracellular drug and gene delivery, Biopolymers source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“For cationic complexes, cellular uptake is partly induced through electrostatic interaction between the positive charge of the complexes and the negative charge of the cell membrane.”
§ Non-viral delivery systems for CRISPR/Cas9-based genome editing: challenges and opportunities > 5. Critical obstacles for non-viral delivery of CRISPR/Cas9 system
plainconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“For example, due to the overexpression of αvβ3 integrin receptors on tumor vasculature, the nanoparticles decorated with arginine-glycine-glutamic acid (RGD) peptide, a ligand for αvβ3 integrin receptors, have more access to the targeted tumor tissues [163–165].”
§ Non-viral delivery systems for CRISPR/Cas9-based genome editing: challenges and opportunities > 5. Critical obstacles for non-viral delivery of CRISPR/Cas9 system
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [163] Zhang, 2018, 68Ga-BBN-RGD PET/CT for GRPR and integrin αvβ3 imaging in patients with breast cancer, Theranostics source
- Not checked yetcites [164] Li, 2016, Multifunctional "core-shell" nanoparticles-based gene delivery for treatment of aggressive melanoma, Biomaterials source
- Not checked yetcites [165] Amin, 2015, Development of a novel cyclic RGD peptide for multiple targeting approaches of liposomes to tumor region, J. Control Release source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- The authors state this as an assumption: Strategies for facilitating particle accumulation in targeted tissues for non-viral delivery vectors-mediated gene therapy can also be applied to non-viral vectors-mediated CRISPR/Cas9 genome editing.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Meanwhile, many types of ligands, such as folate, transferrin, antibody and aptamer, etc., can also be incorporated into the non-viral vectors to boost cellular uptake via receptor-mediated endocytosis [171–173].”
§ Non-viral delivery systems for CRISPR/Cas9-based genome editing: challenges and opportunities > 5. Critical obstacles for non-viral delivery of CRISPR/Cas9 system
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [171] Molas, 2003, Receptor-mediated gene transfer vectors: progress towards genetic pharmaceuticals, Curr. Gene Ther. source
- Not checked yetcites [172] Peer, 2007, Nanocarriers as an emerging platform for cancer therapy, Nat. Nanotechnol. source
- Not checked yetcites [173] Steichen, 2013, A review of current nanoparticle and targeting moieties for the delivery of cancer therapeutics, Eur. J. Pharmaceut. Sci. source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Generally, after complexation with non-viral vectors to form nanoparticles, the cellular uptake would be promoted.”
§ Non-viral delivery systems for CRISPR/Cas9-based genome editing: challenges and opportunities > 5. Critical obstacles for non-viral delivery of CRISPR/Cas9 system
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“The recently developed HITI strategy exhibits much higher knock-in efficiency than HDR both in vitro and in vivo [86, 87].”
§ Non-viral delivery systems for CRISPR/Cas9-based genome editing: challenges and opportunities > 6. Perspectives
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [86] He, 2016, Knock-in of large reporter genes in human cells via CRISPR/Cas9-induced homology-dependent and independent DNA repair, Nucleic Acids Res. source
- Not checked yetcites [87] Suzuki, 2016, In vivo genome editing via CRISPR/Cas9 mediated homology-independent targeted integration, Nature source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Since the corrected cells have no selection advantages in most genetic disorders, the correction efficiency will undoubtedly need to improve.”
§ Non-viral delivery systems for CRISPR/Cas9-based genome editing: challenges and opportunities > 6. Perspectives
boosteddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Besides, due to the recognition preference of some specific bases of CRISPR/Cas9 system and the diverse epigenetic landscape, different targeted gene loci may exhibit distinctive different gene editing efficiencies [140, 201–203].”
§ Non-viral delivery systems for CRISPR/Cas9-based genome editing: challenges and opportunities > 6. Perspectives
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [140] Kleinstiver, 2015, Broadening the targeting range of Staphylococcus aureus CRISPR-Cas9 by modifying PAM recognition, Nat. Biotechnol. source
- Not checked yetcites [201] Nishimasu, 2017, Structural basis for the altered PAM recognition by engineered CRISPR-Cpf1, Mol. Cell source
- Not checked yetcites [202] Chylinski, 2014, Classification and evolution of type II CRISPR-Cas systems, Nucleic Acids Res. source
- Not checked yetcites [203] Wang, 2008, Combinatorial patterns of histone acetylations and methylations in the human genome, Nat. Genet. source
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Novel effective non-viral vector for CRISPR/Cas9 delivery is still one of the bottlenecks for the successful clinical translation of CRISPR/Cas9-based genome editing to date.”
§ Non-viral delivery systems for CRISPR/Cas9-based genome editing: challenges and opportunities > 6. Perspectives
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In addition, delivery alternatives are another main challenge for the application of CRISPR/Cas9 gene editing system both in vitro and in vivo.”
§ Non-viral delivery systems for CRISPR/Cas9-based genome editing: challenges and opportunities > 6. Perspectives
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Although numerous non-viral vectors have been developed and exploited in the field of gene therapy over the past decades, the non-viral vectors applied in CRISPR/Cas9 delivery are still very few so far.”
§ Non-viral delivery systems for CRISPR/Cas9-based genome editing: challenges and opportunities > 6. Perspectives
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“One possible reason is that the large-sized Cas9 protein or plasmid is difficult to be efficiently encapsulated and delivered.”
§ Non-viral delivery systems for CRISPR/Cas9-based genome editing: challenges and opportunities > 6. Perspectives
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The mitotic state of the targeted cells is another major concern.”
§ Non-viral delivery systems for CRISPR/Cas9-based genome editing: challenges and opportunities > 6. Perspectives
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“More importantly, HITI keeps its high efficiency in the non-mitotic cells, which are present in most adult tissues [87].”
§ Non-viral delivery systems for CRISPR/Cas9-based genome editing: challenges and opportunities > 6. Perspectives
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [87] Suzuki, 2016, In vivo genome editing via CRISPR/Cas9 mediated homology-independent targeted integration, Nature source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Non-mitotic cells are very inefficient for HDR-based repair, which is the main pathway to correct genetic disorders to date [87, 200].”
§ Non-viral delivery systems for CRISPR/Cas9-based genome editing: challenges and opportunities > 6. Perspectives
What the sources say
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- It may state two separate claims as one. 39
- The quote only partly states this claim. 1
- Probably not a substantial claim. 19
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“However, the desired recombination efficacy often occurs infrequently, which presents enormous challenges for robust applications [61, 82–84].”
§ Non-viral delivery systems for CRISPR/Cas9-based genome editing: challenges and opportunities > 2. Limitations and challenges of CRISPR/Cas9-based genome editing
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [61] Wang, 2013, One-step generation of mice carrying mutations in multiple genes by CRISPR/Cas-mediated genome engineering, Cell source
- Not checked yetcites [82] Chu, 2015, Increasing the efficiency of homology-directed repair for CRISPR-Cas9-induced precise gene editing in mammalian cells, Nat. Biotechnol. source
- Not checked yetcites [83] Yu, 2015, Small molecules enhance CRISPR genome editing in pluripotent stem cells, Cell Stem Cell source
- Not checked yetcites [84] Yang, 2013, One-step generation of mice carrying reporter and conditional alleles by CRISPR/Cas-mediated genome engineering, Cell source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Although inhibiting the NHEJ pathway with gene silencing or chemical inhibitors can partially increase the efficiency of HDR pathway, the gene repair efficacy still needs to be further improved for disease therapy [82, 85].”
§ Non-viral delivery systems for CRISPR/Cas9-based genome editing: challenges and opportunities > 2. Limitations and challenges of CRISPR/Cas9-based genome editing
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [82] Chu, 2015, Increasing the efficiency of homology-directed repair for CRISPR-Cas9-induced precise gene editing in mammalian cells, Nat. Biotechnol. source
- Not checked yetcites [85] Maruyama, 2015, Increasing the efficiency of precise genome editing with CRISPR-Cas9 by inhibition of nonhomologous end joining, Nat. Biotechnol. source
plainconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“This system induced higher targeted gene disruption efficacy than that of Lipofectamine 3000 in vitro. After intraperitoneal administration, they also showed effective disruption of targeted MTH1 gene and significantly inhibited the progression of ovarian tumor in vivo (Fig. 4A) [117].”
§ Non-viral delivery systems for CRISPR/Cas9-based genome editing: challenges and opportunities > 4. Current non-viral delivery vectors for CRISPR/Cas9 delivery > 4.2 Non-viral vectors in vivo
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [117] Li, 2017, Artificial vrus delivers CRISPR-Cas9 system for genome editing of cells in mice, ACS Nano source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“This delivery system enabled effective knock-outs of target gene (Plk-1) and inhibited the growth of melanoma both in vitro and in vivo (Fig. 4B) [118].”
§ Non-viral delivery systems for CRISPR/Cas9-based genome editing: challenges and opportunities > 4. Current non-viral delivery vectors for CRISPR/Cas9 delivery > 4.2 Non-viral vectors in vivo
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [118] Wang, 2018, Thermo-triggered release of CRISPR-Cas9 system by lipid-encapsulated gold nanoparticles for tumor therapy, Angew Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“All these results demonstrated that this system substantially reduced progressive hearing loss in Beethoven mouse model (Fig. 3B) [113].”
§ Non-viral delivery systems for CRISPR/Cas9-based genome editing: challenges and opportunities > 4. Current non-viral delivery vectors for CRISPR/Cas9 delivery > 4.2 Non-viral vectors in vivo
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [113] Gao, 2018, Treatment of autosomal dominant hearing loss by in vivo delivery of genome editing agents, Nature source
boosteddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
The quote only partly states this claim.
In the paper
“After being injected into the hindlimb muscle of mdx mice simultaneously with cardiotoxin (CTX), this system efficiently corrected the DNA mutation that causes DMD in mice with reduced off-target effect and reduced muscle fibrosis in mdx mice (Fig. 3A) [110].”
§ Non-viral delivery systems for CRISPR/Cas9-based genome editing: challenges and opportunities > 4. Current non-viral delivery vectors for CRISPR/Cas9 delivery > 4.2 Non-viral vectors in vivo
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [110] Lee, 2017, Nanoparticle delivery of Cas9 ribonucleoprotein and donor DNA in vivo induces homology-directed DNA repair, Nat. Biomed. Eng. source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Ramakrishna et al. developed cell-penetrating peptide (CPP)-conjugated recombinant Cas9 protein and CPP-complexed guide RNAs for gene disruptions of CCR5 locus in human cell lines, including HEK293T, HeLa, NCCIT (a human pluripotent embryonal carcinoma cell line), human dermal fibroblasts and human embryonic stem cells.”
- Also stated in: § 4.1 Non-viral vectors in vitro and ex vivo · plain
“This system led to efficient disruptions of CCR5 gene with minimal off-target mutations [96].”
§ Non-viral delivery systems for CRISPR/Cas9-based genome editing: challenges and opportunities > 4. Current non-viral delivery vectors for CRISPR/Cas9 delivery > 4.1 Non-viral vectors in vitro and ex vivo
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [96] Ramakrishna, 2014, Gene disruption by cell-penetrating peptide-mediated delivery of Cas9 protein and guide RNA, Genome Res. source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Also stated in: § 4.1 Non-viral vectors in vitro and ex vivo · plain
In the paper
“With a single intravenous administration, this system enabled significant editing of the TTR gene in the liver of mice or rats, and resulted in a dramatic reduction (>97% for mice, >90% for rats) in serum TTR protein levels.”
§ Non-viral delivery systems for CRISPR/Cas9-based genome editing: challenges and opportunities > 4. Current non-viral delivery vectors for CRISPR/Cas9 delivery > 4.2 Non-viral vectors in vivo
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [116] Jonathan, 2018, A single administration of CRISPR/Cas9 lipid nanoparticles achieves robust and persistent in vivo genome editing, Cell Rep. source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Yin et al. combined lipid nanoparticle-mediated delivery of Cas9 mRNA with AAV encoding sgRNAs and donor templates to repair FAH gene in a mouse model of human hereditary tyrosinemia. The efficiency of correction was >6% of hepatocytes after a single application and the treatment rescued disease symptoms such as weight loss and liver damage [112].”
§ Non-viral delivery systems for CRISPR/Cas9-based genome editing: challenges and opportunities > 4. Current non-viral delivery vectors for CRISPR/Cas9 delivery > 4.2 Non-viral vectors in vivo
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [112] Yin, 2016, Therapeutic genome editing by combined viral and non-viral delivery of CRISPR system components in vivo, Nat. Biotechnol. source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“However, with the rapid development of novel biomaterials in recent years, efficient delivery of gene payloads to pass the multiple barriers under physiological conditions and promote transgene expression can be achieved.”
§ Non-viral delivery systems for CRISPR/Cas9-based genome editing: challenges and opportunities > 1. Introduction
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Nevertheless, with the rapid development of various synthetic vectors, non-viral vectors are very likely to provide unique advantages over viral vectors in these fields.”
§ Non-viral delivery systems for CRISPR/Cas9-based genome editing: challenges and opportunities > 4. Current non-viral delivery vectors for CRISPR/Cas9 delivery > 4.2 Non-viral vectors in vivo
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“It also offers the most transient functionality of genome editing cassette with reduced off-target effects and toxicity.”
§ Non-viral delivery systems for CRISPR/Cas9-based genome editing: challenges and opportunities > 3. Modes of CRISPR/Cas9 delivery
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“As an alternative, non-viral vectors may offer tantalizing possibility in CRISPR/Cas9 delivery with respect to their low immunogenicity, absence of endogenous virus recombination, less limitation in delivering larger genetic payloads and ease of large-scale production [73–75].”
§ Non-viral delivery systems for CRISPR/Cas9-based genome editing: challenges and opportunities > 1. Introduction
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [73] Pack, 2005, Design and development of polymers for gene delivery, Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. source
- Not checked yetcites [74] Li, 2007, Non-viral is superior to viral gene delivery, J. Control Release source
- Not checked yetcites [75] Li, 2015, Challenges in CRISPR/CAS9 delivery: potential roles of nonviral vectors, Hum. Gene Ther. source
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Although viral vectors have been widely used in the delivery of the CRISPR/Cas9 system in vitro and in vivo, their fundamental shortcomings, such as the risk of carcinogenesis, limited insertion size, immune responses and difficulty in large-scale production, severely limit their further applications.”
- Also stated in: § 1. Introduction · plain
“Similarly, although highly efficient, the intrinsic drawbacks associated with viral vectors, including the risk of carcinogenesis, limitation of insertion size, immune responses and difficulty in large-scale production, severely limited their applications [69–72].”
§ Non-viral delivery systems for CRISPR/Cas9-based genome editing: challenges and opportunities > Abstract
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [69] Lehrman, 1999, Virus treatment questioned after gene therapy death, Nature source
- Not checked yetcites [70] Gore, 2003, Adverse effects of gene therapy: gene therapy can cause leukaemia: no shock, mild horror but a probe, Gene Ther. source
- Not checked yetcites [71] Donahue, 1992, Helper virus induced T cell lymphoma in nonhuman primates after retroviral mediated gene transfer, J. Exp. Med. source
- Not checked yetcites [72] Sun, 2003, Immune responses to adeno-associated virus and its recombinant vectors, Gene Ther. source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Also stated in: § 1. Introduction · plain
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Furthermore, CRISPR/Cas9 system holds tremendous promise for gene therapy [46–51]. It can correct causal mutations in the original genome and rescue the disease phenotypes of monogenic disorders permanently, which currently represents the most translatable field in CRISPR/Cas9-mediated disease therapy.”
§ Non-viral delivery systems for CRISPR/Cas9-based genome editing: challenges and opportunities > 1. Introduction
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [46] Yin, 2014, Genome editing with Cas9 in adult mice corrects a disease mutation and phenotype, Nat. Biotechnol. source
- Not checked yetcites [47] Wu, 2013, Correction of a genetic disease in mouse via use of CRISPR-Cas9, Cell Stem Cell source
- Not checked yetcites [48] Lin, 2014, The CRISPR/Cas9 system facilitates clearance of the intrahepatic HBV templates in vivo, Mol. Ther. Nucleic Acids source
- Not checked yetcites [49] Dever, 2016, CRISPR/Cas9 β-globin gene targeting in human haematopoietic stem cells, Nature source
- Not checked yetcites [50] Gaj, 2017, In vivo genome editing improves motor function and extends survival in a mouse model of ALS, Sci. Adv. source
- Not checked yetcites [51] Bengtsson, 2017, Muscle-specific CRISPR/Cas9 dystrophin gene editing ameliorates pathophysiology in a mouse model for Duchenne muscular dystrophy, Nat. Commun. source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“However, due to the multiple functions of epigenetics, safety is a big concern that needs special attention when applying these strategies.”
§ Non-viral delivery systems for CRISPR/Cas9-based genome editing: challenges and opportunities > 4. Current non-viral delivery vectors for CRISPR/Cas9 delivery > 4.2 Non-viral vectors in vivo
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The second obstacle for plasmid-based expression is the requirement of nuclear entry for DNA transcription, which partially decreases the genome editing efficiency and also induces the delay in therapeutic efficacy.”
§ Non-viral delivery systems for CRISPR/Cas9-based genome editing: challenges and opportunities > 3. Modes of CRISPR/Cas9 delivery
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Furthermore, Cas9 mRNA delivery provides transient expression of Cas9 protein, which may be helpful for decreasing the off-target editing events.”
§ Non-viral delivery systems for CRISPR/Cas9-based genome editing: challenges and opportunities > 3. Modes of CRISPR/Cas9 delivery
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Like RNPs, Cas9 mRNA administration results in quick onset of genome editing, as Cas9 mRNA bypasses the requirement of nuclear entry for transcription.”
§ Non-viral delivery systems for CRISPR/Cas9-based genome editing: challenges and opportunities > 3. Modes of CRISPR/Cas9 delivery
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Monogenic diseases can tolerate a low initial gene editing efficiency due to the selective advantages of the corrected cells, while cancer treatment requires relatively high editing efficiency to ensure effective therapy, because the unedited cancer cells possess selective advantages and proliferate quickly.”
§ Non-viral delivery systems for CRISPR/Cas9-based genome editing: challenges and opportunities > 4. Current non-viral delivery vectors for CRISPR/Cas9 delivery > 4.2 Non-viral vectors in vivo
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“In addition, the plasmid-based expression often leads to a longer duration of Cas9 protein, which may result in higher off-target effects and strong immune responses [95].”
§ Non-viral delivery systems for CRISPR/Cas9-based genome editing: challenges and opportunities > 3. Modes of CRISPR/Cas9 delivery
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [95] Hughes, 2009, Immunogenicity of intrathecal plasmid gene delivery: cytokine release and effects on transgene expression, J. Gene Med. source
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Generally, CRISPR/Cas9 systems delivered by viral or no-viral vectors are more likely to work well in vitro and ex vivo owing to the direct interaction with cells.”
§ Non-viral delivery systems for CRISPR/Cas9-based genome editing: challenges and opportunities > 4. Current non-viral delivery vectors for CRISPR/Cas9 delivery > 4.1 Non-viral vectors in vitro and ex vivo
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“dCas9-KRAB system, recruiting a diverse array of histone modifiers that reversibly suppresses gene expression through the formation of heterochromatin, significantly reduced the expression of a series of endogenous genes in the genome [125, 128].”
§ Non-viral delivery systems for CRISPR/Cas9-based genome editing: challenges and opportunities > 4. Current non-viral delivery vectors for CRISPR/Cas9 delivery > 4.2 Non-viral vectors in vivo
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [125] Thakore, 2015, Highly specific epigenome editing by CRISPR-Cas9 repressors for silencing of distal regulatory elements, Nat. Methods source
- Not checked yetcites [128] Thakore, 2016, Editing the epigenome: technologies for programmable transcription and epigenetic modulation, Nat. Methods source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In recent years, CRISPR/Cas9 systems have been widely applied in manipulating mouse zygotes and cultured cells ex vivo and in vitro.”
§ Non-viral delivery systems for CRISPR/Cas9-based genome editing: challenges and opportunities > 4. Current non-viral delivery vectors for CRISPR/Cas9 delivery > 4.1 Non-viral vectors in vitro and ex vivo
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Generally, the particles should be nano-sized and the junction of endothelial cells has a great influence on the extravasation of these particles.”
§ Non-viral delivery systems for CRISPR/Cas9-based genome editing: challenges and opportunities > 5. Critical obstacles for non-viral delivery of CRISPR/Cas9 system
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“The molecular weight of the commonly used Cas9 protein from streptococcus pyogenes is about 160 KD, larger than that of the most proteins [89].”
§ Non-viral delivery systems for CRISPR/Cas9-based genome editing: challenges and opportunities > 5. Critical obstacles for non-viral delivery of CRISPR/Cas9 system
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [89] Subburaj, 2016, Site-directed mutagenesis in Petunia x hybrida protoplast system using direct delivery of purified recombinant Cas9 ribonucleoproteins, Plant Cell Rep. source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Following systemic administration, the elements of CRISPR/Cas9 system should remain stable before reaching its target site. Then the elements need to be effectively taken up by the targeted cell types and escape from endo-lysosome system to avoid degradation.”
§ Non-viral delivery systems for CRISPR/Cas9-based genome editing: challenges and opportunities > 5. Critical obstacles for non-viral delivery of CRISPR/Cas9 system
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“This issue is very important for targeted gene editing efficacy as well as the off-target probability in other tissues.”
§ Non-viral delivery systems for CRISPR/Cas9-based genome editing: challenges and opportunities > 5. Critical obstacles for non-viral delivery of CRISPR/Cas9 system
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“There are two main limitations of non-viral vectors-mediated CRISPR/Cas9 delivery in vivo. The first one is the serum stability of polyplexes after systemic administration [73]. The second one is the relatively low transfection efficiency in the targeted tissues after administration in vivo [76, 77].”
§ Non-viral delivery systems for CRISPR/Cas9-based genome editing: challenges and opportunities > 4. Current non-viral delivery vectors for CRISPR/Cas9 delivery > 4.2 Non-viral vectors in vivo
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [73] Pack, 2005, Design and development of polymers for gene delivery, Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. source
- Not checked yetcites [76] Mintzer, 2009, Nonviral vectors for gene delivery, Chem. Rev. source
- Not checked yetcites [77] Davis, 2002, Non-viral gene delivery systems, Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Meanwhile, native Cas9 protein is positively charged, while the conventional proteins are negatively charged [88, 97, 103, 139].”
§ Non-viral delivery systems for CRISPR/Cas9-based genome editing: challenges and opportunities > 5. Critical obstacles for non-viral delivery of CRISPR/Cas9 system
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [88] Zuris, 2015, Cationic lipid-mediated delivery of proteins enables efficient protein-based genome editing in vitro and in vivo, Nat. Biotechnol. source
- Not checked yetcites [97] Mout, 2017, Direct cytosolic delivery of CRISPR/Cas9-ribonucleoprotein for efficient gene editing, ACS Nano source
- Not checked yetcites [103] Sun, 2015, Self-assembled DNA nanoclews for the efficient delivery of CRISPR-Cas9 for genome editing, Angew Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. source
- Not checked yetcites [139] Jinek, 2014, Structures of Cas9 endonucleases reveal RNA-mediated conformational activation, Science source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“However, the effects of either siRNA or chemical inhibitor are transient and are limited to the mother cell that takes the drug. If the cell divides, these drugs will lose activity in the daughter cells.”
§ Non-viral delivery systems for CRISPR/Cas9-based genome editing: challenges and opportunities > 4. Current non-viral delivery vectors for CRISPR/Cas9 delivery > 4.2 Non-viral vectors in vivo
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“These issues are not just for non-viral vectors-mediated CRISPR/Cas9 delivery, but for non-viral vectors-mediated gene delivery in general.”
§ Non-viral delivery systems for CRISPR/Cas9-based genome editing: challenges and opportunities > 4. Current non-viral delivery vectors for CRISPR/Cas9 delivery > 4.2 Non-viral vectors in vivo
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“On the one hand, protein, plasmid and RNA are vulnerable to proteases and nucleases in the blood. They can degrade quickly in naked form in systemic circulation.”
§ Non-viral delivery systems for CRISPR/Cas9-based genome editing: challenges and opportunities > 5. Critical obstacles for non-viral delivery of CRISPR/Cas9 system
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Although the newly discovered Cas9 form from Staphylococcus aureus strain (SaCas9) is about 1 kb shorter than SpCas9, the overall genetic size is still too large for application [94, 140].”
§ Non-viral delivery systems for CRISPR/Cas9-based genome editing: challenges and opportunities > 5. Critical obstacles for non-viral delivery of CRISPR/Cas9 system
What the sources say
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“PEGylation, the most commonly used strategy to reduce the opsonization and minimize the clearance by RES, may also be applicable for non-viral vectors-mediated CRISPR/Cas9 delivery [144, 145].”
§ Non-viral delivery systems for CRISPR/Cas9-based genome editing: challenges and opportunities > 5. Critical obstacles for non-viral delivery of CRISPR/Cas9 system
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [144] Ogris, 1999, PEGylated DNA/transferrin-PEI complexes: reduced interaction with blood components, extended circulation in blood and potential for systemic gene delivery, Gene Ther. source
- Not checked yetcites [145] Malam, 2011, Current trends in the application of nanoparticles in drug delivery, Curr. Med. Chem. source
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“In the past decades, there have been extensive efforts on facilitating particles accumulation in the targeted tissues for non-viral delivery vectors-mediated gene therapy [155, 156].”
§ Non-viral delivery systems for CRISPR/Cas9-based genome editing: challenges and opportunities > 5. Critical obstacles for non-viral delivery of CRISPR/Cas9 system
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [155] Liu, 2017, Tumor associated macrophage-targeted microRNA delivery with dual-responsive polypeptide nanovectors for anti-cancer therapy, Biomaterials source
- Not checked yetcites [156] Li, 2017, Targeted Co-delivery of PTX and TR3 siRNA by PTP peptide modified dendrimer for the treatment of pancreatic cancer, Small
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Additionally, surface decorating active targeting ligands on the vectors should be another effective method to promote targeted accumulation via receptor-mediated recognition.”
§ Non-viral delivery systems for CRISPR/Cas9-based genome editing: challenges and opportunities > 5. Critical obstacles for non-viral delivery of CRISPR/Cas9 system
plainconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
- The authors state this as an assumption: Strategies for facilitating particle accumulation in targeted tissues for non-viral delivery vectors-mediated gene therapy can also be applied to non-viral vectors-mediated CRISPR/Cas9 genome editing.
In the paper
“Liu et al. fabricated pH-responsive poly(D,L-lactic-co-glycolic acid) (PLGA) nanoparticles encapsulating ammonium bicarbonate (NH4HCO3) to trigger antigen release from endo-lysosomes. NH4HCO3 interacted with protons in endo-lysosomes, then produced CO2 and NH3 to disrupt the endo-lysosomes and promote antigen release into the cytosol [183].”
§ Non-viral delivery systems for CRISPR/Cas9-based genome editing: challenges and opportunities > 5. Critical obstacles for non-viral delivery of CRISPR/Cas9 system
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [183] Liu, 2015, pH-responsive poly(D,L-lactic-co-glycolic acid) nanoparticles with rapid antigen release behavior promote immune response, ACS Nano source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“One underlying mechanism is these peptides undergo a structural transformation from a random coil to an α-helical conformation in lower pH environments, thus promoting endosomal fusion.”
§ Non-viral delivery systems for CRISPR/Cas9-based genome editing: challenges and opportunities > 5. Critical obstacles for non-viral delivery of CRISPR/Cas9 system
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“For CRISPR/Cas9-based plasmids, they need to overcome more barriers than that of CRISPR RNPs and mRNA. They have to enter the nucleus for transcription and traffic back to the cytosol for translation.”
§ Non-viral delivery systems for CRISPR/Cas9-based genome editing: challenges and opportunities > 5. Critical obstacles for non-viral delivery of CRISPR/Cas9 system
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Due to the threshold for rapid renal excretion being about 5.5 nm, the hydrodynamic diameters of the prepared nanoparticles need to be larger than this size [168–170].”
§ Non-viral delivery systems for CRISPR/Cas9-based genome editing: challenges and opportunities > 5. Critical obstacles for non-viral delivery of CRISPR/Cas9 system
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [168] Choi, 2007, Renal clearance of quantum dots, Nat. Biotechnol. source
- Not checked yetcites [169] Longmire, 2008, Clearance properties of nano-sized particles and molecules as imaging agents: considerations and caveats, Nanomedicine (Lond) source
- Not checked yetcites [170] Choi, 2010, Design considerations for tumour-targeted nanoparticles, Nat. Nanotechnol. source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The fifth encountered obstacle is the phagocytic clearance, blockage of RES in targeted tissues especially in liver and spleen, and the negatively charged components of extracellular matrix.”
§ Non-viral delivery systems for CRISPR/Cas9-based genome editing: challenges and opportunities > 5. Critical obstacles for non-viral delivery of CRISPR/Cas9 system
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Nanoparticles smaller than 9 nm can passively diffuse through nuclear pore complexes (NPCs), while larger ones requiring the assistance of import proteins (e.g., importins) to actively shuttle them into the nucleus [73].”
§ Non-viral delivery systems for CRISPR/Cas9-based genome editing: challenges and opportunities > 5. Critical obstacles for non-viral delivery of CRISPR/Cas9 system
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [73] Pack, 2005, Design and development of polymers for gene delivery, Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Some studies have shown that hyperthermia can increase the membrane permeability of compounds and enhance cellular uptake. But the temperature and duration of this approach need to be carefully controlled.”
§ Non-viral delivery systems for CRISPR/Cas9-based genome editing: challenges and opportunities > 5. Critical obstacles for non-viral delivery of CRISPR/Cas9 system
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“To balance the effect of penetration and renal excretion, environmental stimuli-responsive size changeable tactics would be a possible compromising solution.”
§ Non-viral delivery systems for CRISPR/Cas9-based genome editing: challenges and opportunities > 5. Critical obstacles for non-viral delivery of CRISPR/Cas9 system
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“It seems like that the cationic lipid-based vectors were one of the most effective delivery approaches for CRISPR/Cas9 system to date. But it is mainly limited to local administration.”
§ Non-viral delivery systems for CRISPR/Cas9-based genome editing: challenges and opportunities > 6. Perspectives
hedgedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: unclear — It is unclear why the paper says it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Meanwhile, different cell types or targeted genes can also affect the efficiency of the CRISPR/Cas9 system [93, 199].”
§ Non-viral delivery systems for CRISPR/Cas9-based genome editing: challenges and opportunities > 6. Perspectives
What the sources say
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“NLSs can be recognized by importin α, the nuclear import receptor, and trigger the subsequent transportation from the cytosol to the nucleus [198].”
§ Non-viral delivery systems for CRISPR/Cas9-based genome editing: challenges and opportunities > 5. Critical obstacles for non-viral delivery of CRISPR/Cas9 system
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [198] Fontes, 2000, Structural basis of recognition of monopartite and bipartite nuclear localization sequences by mammalian importin-α, J. Mol. Biol. source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Next, the efficiency will also need to be improved for in vivo application, especially in correcting majority of genetic disorders.”
§ Non-viral delivery systems for CRISPR/Cas9-based genome editing: challenges and opportunities > 6. Perspectives
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Moreover, unlike commonly delivery approaches for siRNA or protein, whose action site is in the cytosol, CRISPR/Cas9 systems must be delivered to the nucleus to initiate genome editing in the chromosome.”
§ Non-viral delivery systems for CRISPR/Cas9-based genome editing: challenges and opportunities > 6. Perspectives
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“For the former off-target effects, tissue-specific promoters in CRISPR/Cas9-based plasmid have been introduced into the system to partially solve this problem.”
§ Non-viral delivery systems for CRISPR/Cas9-based genome editing: challenges and opportunities > 6. Perspectives
plainconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Most NLSs are characterized by short basic and cationic peptide sequences.”
§ Non-viral delivery systems for CRISPR/Cas9-based genome editing: challenges and opportunities > 5. Critical obstacles for non-viral delivery of CRISPR/Cas9 system
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“However, the specificity of this technology will need to be further improved to decrease the potential off-target probability for increasing safety.”
§ Non-viral delivery systems for CRISPR/Cas9-based genome editing: challenges and opportunities > 6. Perspectives
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Meanwhile, targeted delivery of CRISPR/Cas9 system by tissue-specific AAV type or non-viral vectors could be another effective solution to this issue.”
§ Non-viral delivery systems for CRISPR/Cas9-based genome editing: challenges and opportunities > 6. Perspectives
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The latter would particularly benefit from non-viral vectors.”
§ Non-viral delivery systems for CRISPR/Cas9-based genome editing: challenges and opportunities > 6. Perspectives
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In addition, proper selection of the targeting site, rational design of sgRNA and using paired Cas9 nickases could be effective approaches to alleviate the latter off-target effects.”
§ Non-viral delivery systems for CRISPR/Cas9-based genome editing: challenges and opportunities > 6. Perspectives
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“These issues may be resolved by enhancing activity and delivery efficiency of the CRISPR-Cas9 system.”
§ Non-viral delivery systems for CRISPR/Cas9-based genome editing: challenges and opportunities > 6. Perspectives
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence.
The authors state this as an assumption.
Strategies for facilitating particle accumulation in targeted tissues for non-viral delivery vectors-mediated gene therapy can also be applied to non-viral vectors-mediated CRISPR/Cas9 genome editing.
“We assume that these strategies can also be applied to non-viral vectors-mediated CRISPR/Cas9 genome editing.”
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Firstly, genome editing components must reach the cell nucleus to achieve therapeutic effects. Thus, extracellular and intracellular barriers need to be overcome, including avoiding enzymatic degradation in the blood, circumventing clearance by the reticuloendothelial system (RES), penetrating cell membranes, escaping endosome entrapment, and infiltrating nuclear membranes.”
From RNA delivery biomaterials for the treatment of genetic and rare diseases (2019) · cites this paper as [208]
In the citing paper
“Secondly, the complexity and large molecular weight of these components are significant challenges for delivery materials.”
From RNA delivery biomaterials for the treatment of genetic and rare diseases (2019) · cites this paper as [208]
In the citing paper
“Thirdly, genome editing components should be delivered to target tissues and edit specific sequences in a controllable manner to prevent off-target events and immune responses.”
From RNA delivery biomaterials for the treatment of genetic and rare diseases (2019) · cites this paper as [208]
In the citing paper
“These materials are similar to those used for mRNA delivery.[202, 205, 207–211]”
From RNA delivery biomaterials for the treatment of genetic and rare diseases (2019) · cites this paper as [208]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.
Rated minor: it would not touch a result — a value no result rests on, a p-value that stays on the same side of the significance level, or a conflict that is clerical, resolved elsewhere in the paper, or outside its own findings.
In the paper
§ Non-viral delivery systems for CRISPR/Cas9-based genome editing: challenges and opportunities > 4. Current non-viral delivery vectors for CRISPR/Cas9 delivery > 4.2 Non-viral vectors in vivo
“Zuris et al. injected Cas9:sgRNA complexes targeting GFP gene into the cochlea of transgenic Atoh1-GFP mice. This system resulted in ~20% Cas9-mediated genome modification in hair cells [69].”
§ Non-viral delivery systems for CRISPR/Cas9-based genome editing: challenges and opportunities > References
“69. Lehrman S Virus treatment questioned after gene therapy death Nature 401 1999 517 518 10524611”
Citations
Cites
1 retracted
RETRACTED ARTICLE: A mechanism for the suppression of homologous recombination in G1 cells
Orthwein, A., Noordermeer, S. M., Wilson, M. D., Landry, S., Enchev, R. I., Sherker, A., Munro, M., Pinder, J., Salsman, J., Dellaire, G., et al. (2015) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature16142 · Cited by 471
RetractedA Programmable Dual-RNA–Guided DNA Endonuclease in Adaptive Bacterial Immunity
Jinek, M., Chylinski, K., Fonfara, I., Hauer, M., Doudna, J. A., & Charpentier, E. (2012) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1225829 · Cited by 17,116
Multiplex Genome Engineering Using CRISPR/Cas Systems
Cong, L., Ran, F. A., Cox, D., Lin, S., Barretto, R., Habib, N., Hsu, P. D., Wu, X., Jiang, W., Marraffini, L. A., et al. (2013) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1231143 · Cited by 15,339
Genome engineering using the CRISPR-Cas9 system
Ran, F. A., Hsu, P. D., Wright, J., Agarwala, V., Scott, D. A., & Zhang, F. (2013) · Nature Protocols · doi:10.1038/nprot.2013.143 · Cited by 11,133
RNA-Guided Human Genome Engineering via Cas9
Mali, P., Yang, L., Esvelt, K. M., Aach, J., Guell, M., DiCarlo, J. E., Norville, J. E., & Church, G. M. (2013) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1232033 · Cited by 9,210
Nanocarriers as an emerging platform for cancer therapy
Peer, D., Karp, J. M., Hong, S., Farokhzad, O. C., Margalit, R., & Langer, R. (2007) · Nature Nanotechnology · doi:10.1038/nnano.2007.387 · Cited by 8,710
CRISPR Provides Acquired Resistance Against Viruses in Prokaryotes
Barrangou, R., Fremaux, C., Deveau, H., Richards, M., Boyaval, P., Moineau, S., Romero, D. A., & Horvath, P. (2007) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1138140 · Cited by 5,947
Development and Applications of CRISPR-Cas9 for Genome Engineering
Hsu, P. D., Lander, E. S., & Zhang, F. (2014) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2014.05.010 · Cited by 5,762
Genome-scale CRISPR-Cas9 knockout screening in human cells
Shalem, O., Sanjana, N. E., Hartenian, E., Shi, X., Scott, D. A., Mikkelsen, T. S., Heckl, D., Ebert, B. L., Root, D. E., Doench, J. G., et al. (2014) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1247005 · Cited by 5,234
Repurposing CRISPR as an RNA-Guided Platform for Sequence-Specific Control of Gene Expression
Qi, L. S., Larson, M. H., Gilbert, L. A., Doudna, J. A., Weissman, J. S., Arkin, A. P., & Lim, W. A. (2013) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2013.02.022 · Cited by 5,016
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Fang, J., Islam, W., & Maeda, H. (2020) · Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.addr.2020.06.005 · Cited by 757
Emerging blood–brain-barrier-crossing nanotechnology for brain cancer theranostics
Tang, W., Fan, W., Lau, J., Deng, L., Shen, Z., & Chen, X. S. (2019) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/c8cs00805a · Cited by 610
Self-citationRecent advancements in liposome technology
Filipczak, N., Pan, J., Yalamarty, S. S. K., & Torchilin, V. P. (2020) · Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.addr.2020.06.022 · Cited by 611
Wei, T., Cheng, Q., Min, Y.-L., Olson, E. N., & Siegwart, D. J. (2020) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-020-17029-3 · Cited by 615
Base editing: advances and therapeutic opportunities
Porto, E. M., Komor, A. C., Slaymaker, I. M., & Yeo, G. W.-M. (2020) · Nature Reviews Drug Discovery · doi:10.1038/s41573-020-0084-6 · Cited by 495
Metadata
- Authors
- Li, L., Hu, S., & Chen, X.
- Affiliations
- National Institutes of Health (US)
- Central South University (CN)
- Corresponding author
- Hu, Shuo
- Chen, Xiaoyuan
- Venue
- Biomaterials
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2018-07
- Volume
- 171
- Pages
- 207-218
- ISSN
- 0142-9612 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC5944364
- OpenAlex
- W2802060782
- Cited by
- 415
- References
- 206
- Citations by year
- 2026: 31 · 2025: 48 · 2024: 59 · 2023: 64 · 2022: 57 · 2021: 71 · 2020: 43 · 2019: 34 · 2018: 8
- FWCI
- 3.83
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Biomaterials (acceptedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- Funders
- National Natural Science Foundation of China (81771873)
- National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering
- National Institutes of Health
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA Interference and Gene Delivery
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › CRISPR and Genetic Engineering
- Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Biomaterials › Nanoparticle-Based Drug Delivery
- Keywords
- CRISPR/Cas9, genome editing, non-viral delivery, gene delivery vectors, lipid nanoparticles, polymeric nanoparticles, plasmid DNA delivery, mRNA delivery, protein delivery, in vivo delivery, CRISPR therapeutics
- MeSH terms
- Gene Editing, CRISPR-Associated Protein 9, Disease, Viruses, Gene Transfer Techniques, CRISPR-Cas Systems
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-10-10, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).
A second model labelled each claim on 2026-10-10 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review