The DOI matches its Crossref record; 205 of the 206 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; 3 of the 167 sources its claims cite were checked for support.
Non-viral delivery systems for CRISPR/Cas9-based genome editing: Challenges and opportunities
Open accessAbstract
In recent years, CRISPR (clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeat)/Cas (CRISPR-associated) genome editing systems have become one of the most robust platforms in basic biomedical research and therapeutic applications. To date, efficient in vivo delivery of the CRISPR/Cas9 system to the targeted cells remains a challenge. Although viral vectors have been widely used in the delivery of the CRISPR/Cas9 system in vitro and in vivo, their fundamental shortcomings, such as the risk of carcinogenesis, limited insertion size, immune responses and difficulty in large-scale production, severely limit their further applications. Alternative non-viral delivery systems for CRISPR/Cas9 are urgently needed. With the rapid development of non-viral vectors, lipid- or polymer-based nanocarriers have shown great potential for CRISPR/Cas9 delivery. In this review, we analyze the pros and cons of delivering CRISPR/Cas9 systems in the form of plasmid, mRNA, or protein and then discuss the limitations and challenges of CRISPR/Cas9-based genome editing. Furthermore, current non-viral vectors that have been applied for CRISPR/Cas9 delivery in vitro and in vivo are outlined in details. Finally, critical obstacles for non-viral delivery of CRISPR/Cas9 system are highlighted and promising strategies to overcome these barriers are proposed.
Overview
AI snapshot
Written from the paper’s full text.
TL;DR
This review argues that efficient in vivo delivery remains a major hurdle for CRISPR/Cas9 genome editing and that non-viral vectors are promising alternatives to viral vectors despite lower delivery efficiency. It surveys plasmid, mRNA, and protein delivery formats, then outlines non-viral vector examples and extracellular/intracellular barriers to clinical translation.
Key findings
- Non-viral vectors may offer low immunogenicity, absence of endogenous virus recombination, less limitation on large genetic payloads, and ease of large-scale production, but relatively low gene delivery efficiency and transgene expression remain major barriers.
- The review compares three CRISPR/Cas9 delivery formats: plasmid DNA is simple and stable but large (>7 kb total plasmid) and requires nuclear entry; mRNA gives quick, transient expression but has poor stability and possible low efficiency; Cas9/sgRNA ribonucleoprotein gives the swiftest, most transient editing but is difficult to deliver due to Cas9 size (~160 kD) and charge.
- Reported non-viral delivery examples include up to 30% editing in HeLa, HEK-293T, and Raw 264.7 cells with arginine-modified gold nanoparticles; 37% reduction in EGFP expression in CHO cells over 4 days with ZIFs; ~39% editing in AGS cells with GO-PEG-PEI; ~20% Cas9-mediated genome modification in cochlear hair cells after Cas9:sgRNA injection; >6% hepatocyte correction in a hereditary tyrosinemia mouse model; and >97% (mice) or >90% (rats) reduction in serum TTR protein levels with LNP-INT01, with editing persisting at least 12 months.
- The paper highlights barriers including encapsulation difficulty, physiological instability, host immune responses, insufficient targeted accumulation, phagocytic/RES clearance, cellular uptake, endosomal/lysosomal degradation, cytoplasmic mobility, and nuclear import.
Methods
- Design: narrative review of non-viral delivery systems for CRISPR/Cas9-based genome editing, focusing on challenges and opportunities rather than presenting new primary data.
- Data/sample: published literature and selected in vitro and in vivo studies on CRISPR/Cas9 delivery using plasmid, mRNA, or protein formats and non-viral vectors.
- Main analysis: thematic synthesis of delivery formats, non-viral vector examples, disease applications, and extracellular/intracellular delivery barriers, with proposed strategies to overcome them.
Limitations
- The paper states that non-viral vectors face two main in vivo limitations: serum stability of polyplexes after systemic administration and relatively low transfection efficiency in targeted tissues. It also states that non-viral vectors applied in CRISPR/Cas9 delivery remain very few and that cationic lipid-based vectors, though among the most effective to date, are mainly limited to local administration.
- The paper states multiple delivery obstacles: effective encapsulation due to large size and charge properties of Cas9 protein, mRNA, and donor DNA; instability under physiological conditions; host immune responses; insufficient accumulation in target tissues; phagocytic clearance and RES blockage; cellular uptake; endosomal/lysosomal degradation; and cytoplasmic mobility/nuclear import.
- Evident from the text: this is a narrative review with selected examples rather than a systematic review or meta-analysis, so it does not provide quantitative pooled estimates or comprehensive comparative efficacy across all non-viral systems.
Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
80 Not checked yet · 43 Own interpretation · 26 No basis given · 2 Partly supported · accuracy not yet measured
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“Once released into the cytosol, non-viral vectors loaded with CRISPR/Cas9 system need to overcome additional barriers in the cytosol, including the mesh-like cytoskeleton and nucleolytic enzymes within the cytosolic milieu [190].”
§ Non-viral delivery systems for CRISPR/Cas9-based genome editing: challenges and opportunities > 5. Critical obstacles for non-viral delivery of CRISPR/Cas9 system
What the sources say
- Partly supportedcites [190] Lechardeur, 2006, Nucleocytoplasmic transport of plasmid DNA: a perilous journey from the cytoplasm to the nucleus, Hum. Gene Ther. sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The sections “Restricted diffusional mobility of pDNA” and “AU2” describe the mesh-like cytoskeleton as a barrier to plasmid DNA movement and cytosolic nucleases as a cause of plasmid DNA degradation after nonviral delivery (page numbers unavailable). The paper addresses plasmid DNA, not CRISPR/Cas9-loaded vectors, so it does not establish those barriers for the specific system named in the claim. (LLM, conf=0.88)
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Partly supported
In the paper
“This approach allows for robust DNA knock-in in both dividing and non-dividing cells in vitro and in vivo [87].”
§ Non-viral delivery systems for CRISPR/Cas9-based genome editing: challenges and opportunities > 2. Limitations and challenges of CRISPR/Cas9-based genome editing
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [87] Suzuki, 2016, In vivo genome editing via CRISPR/Cas9 mediated homology-independent targeted integration, Nature source
boosteddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“More importantly, the editing levels can persist for at least 12 months, despite the transient nature of the delivery system and the editing components.”
§ Non-viral delivery systems for CRISPR/Cas9-based genome editing: challenges and opportunities > 4. Current non-viral delivery vectors for CRISPR/Cas9 delivery > 4.2 Non-viral vectors in vivo
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [116] Jonathan, 2018, A single administration of CRISPR/Cas9 lipid nanoparticles achieves robust and persistent in vivo genome editing, Cell Rep. source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“In another study, Miller et al. reported a non-viral vector based on zwitterionic amino lipids to deliver Cas9 mRNA and sgRNAs. In contrast to transient therapies, they showed permanent editing of LoxP gene in genetically engineered mice containing a homozygous Rosa26 promoter Lox-Stop-Lox tdTomato (tdTO) cassette after intravenous administration [105].”
§ Non-viral delivery systems for CRISPR/Cas9-based genome editing: challenges and opportunities > 4. Current non-viral delivery vectors for CRISPR/Cas9 delivery > 4.2 Non-viral vectors in vivo
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [105] Miller, 2017, Non-Viral CRISPR/Cas gene editing in vitro and in vivo enabled by synthetic nanoparticle co-delivery of Cas9 mRNA and sgRNA, Angew Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Jiang et al. developed lipid-like nanoparticles for targeted delivery of Cas9 mRNA and sgRNA to the liver. This system achieved disruption of HBV DNA and the proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (pcsk9) gene in vivo [104].”
§ Non-viral delivery systems for CRISPR/Cas9-based genome editing: challenges and opportunities > 4. Current non-viral delivery vectors for CRISPR/Cas9 delivery > 4.2 Non-viral vectors in vivo
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [104] Jiang, 2017, A non-viral CRISPR/Cas9 delivery system for therapeutically targeting HBV DNA and pcsk9 in vivo, Cell Res. source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Zuris et al. injected Cas9:sgRNA complexes targeting GFP gene into the cochlea of transgenic Atoh1-GFP mice. This system resulted in ~20% Cas9-mediated genome modification in hair cells [69].”
§ Non-viral delivery systems for CRISPR/Cas9-based genome editing: challenges and opportunities > 4. Current non-viral delivery vectors for CRISPR/Cas9 delivery > 4.2 Non-viral vectors in vivo
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [69] Lehrman, 1999, Virus treatment questioned after gene therapy death, Nature source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Self-assembled DNA nanoclews were constructed for CRISPR/Cas9-based genome editing system delivery. After being loaded with CRISPR RNPs, these nanoclews enabled efficient target disruption of EGFP gene in vitro and in U2OS.EGFP xenograft tumor models in vivo after intratumoral injection [103].”
§ Non-viral delivery systems for CRISPR/Cas9-based genome editing: challenges and opportunities > 4. Current non-viral delivery vectors for CRISPR/Cas9 delivery > 4.2 Non-viral vectors in vivo
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [103] Sun, 2015, Self-assembled DNA nanoclews for the efficient delivery of CRISPR-Cas9 for genome editing, Angew Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Additionally, unlike viral delivery systems, the synthetic nature of LNP-INT01 allowed for multi-dosing regimens to obtain cumulative editing efficacy without significant changes in cytokine levels or body weight.”
§ Non-viral delivery systems for CRISPR/Cas9-based genome editing: challenges and opportunities > 4. Current non-viral delivery vectors for CRISPR/Cas9 delivery > 4.2 Non-viral vectors in vivo
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [116] Jonathan, 2018, A single administration of CRISPR/Cas9 lipid nanoparticles achieves robust and persistent in vivo genome editing, Cell Rep. source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“With this approach, they edited AAVS1 gene and PTEN gene and achieved effective gene editing efficiency up to 30% in HeLa, HEK-293T and Raw 264.7 cell lines (Fig. 2A) [97].”
§ Non-viral delivery systems for CRISPR/Cas9-based genome editing: challenges and opportunities > 4. Current non-viral delivery vectors for CRISPR/Cas9 delivery > 4.1 Non-viral vectors in vitro and ex vivo
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [97] Mout, 2017, Direct cytosolic delivery of CRISPR/Cas9-ribonucleoprotein for efficient gene editing, ACS Nano source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“After loading with CRISPR/Cas9 targeting polo-like kinase 1 (plk1) gene, LHNPs effectively inhibited U87MG tumor growth [119].”
§ Non-viral delivery systems for CRISPR/Cas9-based genome editing: challenges and opportunities > 4. Current non-viral delivery vectors for CRISPR/Cas9 delivery > 4.2 Non-viral vectors in vivo
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [119] Chen, 2017, Targeted delivery of CRISPR/Cas9-mediated cancer gene therapy via liposome-templated hydrogel nanoparticlesaptation repertoires, Adv. Funct. Mater. source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- It may state two separate claims as one. 39
- The quote only partly states this claim. 1
- Probably not a substantial claim. 19
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“Although viral vectors have been widely used in the delivery of the CRISPR/Cas9 system in vitro and in vivo, their fundamental shortcomings, such as the risk of carcinogenesis, limited insertion size, immune responses and difficulty in large-scale production, severely limit their further applications.”
- Also stated in: § 1. Introduction · plain
“Similarly, although highly efficient, the intrinsic drawbacks associated with viral vectors, including the risk of carcinogenesis, limitation of insertion size, immune responses and difficulty in large-scale production, severely limited their applications [69–72].”
§ Non-viral delivery systems for CRISPR/Cas9-based genome editing: challenges and opportunities > Abstract
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [69] Lehrman, 1999, Virus treatment questioned after gene therapy death, Nature source
- Partly supportedcites [70] Gore, 2003, Adverse effects of gene therapy: gene therapy can cause leukaemia: no shock, mild horror but a probe, Gene Ther. sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The article’s discussion of the Fischer trial and UK gene-therapy trials supports a risk of insertional mutagenesis leading to cancer from retroviral vectors. It does not address limited insertion size, immune responses, large-scale production, or CRISPR/Cas9 delivery, so it does not support the full list of shortcomings or their stated effect on further applications. The indexed copy provides no section or page labels. (LLM, conf=0.88)
- Partly supportedcites [71] Donahue, 1992, Helper virus induced T cell lymphoma in nonhuman primates after retroviral mediated gene transfer, J. Exp. Med. sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Summary (p. 1125) reports T-cell lymphomas in monkeys exposed to a retroviral preparation contaminated with replication-competent helper virus, supporting a specific carcinogenesis risk. The paper does not establish limited insertion size, adverse immune responses, or difficulty with large-scale production. Its concluding discussion says the findings should not deter future use of retroviral vectors, so it does not support the claim that these shortcomings severely limit further applications. (LLM, conf=0.90)
- Not checked yetcites [72] Sun, 2003, Immune responses to adeno-associated virus and its recombinant vectors, Gene Ther. source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Also stated in: § 1. Introduction · plain
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“However, the desired recombination efficacy often occurs infrequently, which presents enormous challenges for robust applications [61, 82–84].”
§ Non-viral delivery systems for CRISPR/Cas9-based genome editing: challenges and opportunities > 2. Limitations and challenges of CRISPR/Cas9-based genome editing
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [61] Wang, 2013, One-step generation of mice carrying mutations in multiple genes by CRISPR/Cas-mediated genome engineering, Cell source
- Not checked yetcites [82] Chu, 2015, Increasing the efficiency of homology-directed repair for CRISPR-Cas9-induced precise gene editing in mammalian cells, Nat. Biotechnol. source
- Not checked yetcites [83] Yu, 2015, Small molecules enhance CRISPR genome editing in pluripotent stem cells, Cell Stem Cell source
- Not checked yetcites [84] Yang, 2013, One-step generation of mice carrying reporter and conditional alleles by CRISPR/Cas-mediated genome engineering, Cell source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Although inhibiting the NHEJ pathway with gene silencing or chemical inhibitors can partially increase the efficiency of HDR pathway, the gene repair efficacy still needs to be further improved for disease therapy [82, 85].”
§ Non-viral delivery systems for CRISPR/Cas9-based genome editing: challenges and opportunities > 2. Limitations and challenges of CRISPR/Cas9-based genome editing
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [82] Chu, 2015, Increasing the efficiency of homology-directed repair for CRISPR-Cas9-induced precise gene editing in mammalian cells, Nat. Biotechnol. source
- Not checked yetcites [85] Maruyama, 2015, Increasing the efficiency of precise genome editing with CRISPR-Cas9 by inhibition of nonhomologous end joining, Nat. Biotechnol. source
plainconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“This system induced higher targeted gene disruption efficacy than that of Lipofectamine 3000 in vitro. After intraperitoneal administration, they also showed effective disruption of targeted MTH1 gene and significantly inhibited the progression of ovarian tumor in vivo (Fig. 4A) [117].”
§ Non-viral delivery systems for CRISPR/Cas9-based genome editing: challenges and opportunities > 4. Current non-viral delivery vectors for CRISPR/Cas9 delivery > 4.2 Non-viral vectors in vivo
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [117] Li, 2017, Artificial vrus delivers CRISPR-Cas9 system for genome editing of cells in mice, ACS Nano source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“This delivery system enabled effective knock-outs of target gene (Plk-1) and inhibited the growth of melanoma both in vitro and in vivo (Fig. 4B) [118].”
§ Non-viral delivery systems for CRISPR/Cas9-based genome editing: challenges and opportunities > 4. Current non-viral delivery vectors for CRISPR/Cas9 delivery > 4.2 Non-viral vectors in vivo
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [118] Wang, 2018, Thermo-triggered release of CRISPR-Cas9 system by lipid-encapsulated gold nanoparticles for tumor therapy, Angew Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“All these results demonstrated that this system substantially reduced progressive hearing loss in Beethoven mouse model (Fig. 3B) [113].”
§ Non-viral delivery systems for CRISPR/Cas9-based genome editing: challenges and opportunities > 4. Current non-viral delivery vectors for CRISPR/Cas9 delivery > 4.2 Non-viral vectors in vivo
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [113] Gao, 2018, Treatment of autosomal dominant hearing loss by in vivo delivery of genome editing agents, Nature source
boosteddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
The quote only partly states this claim.
In the paper
“After being injected into the hindlimb muscle of mdx mice simultaneously with cardiotoxin (CTX), this system efficiently corrected the DNA mutation that causes DMD in mice with reduced off-target effect and reduced muscle fibrosis in mdx mice (Fig. 3A) [110].”
§ Non-viral delivery systems for CRISPR/Cas9-based genome editing: challenges and opportunities > 4. Current non-viral delivery vectors for CRISPR/Cas9 delivery > 4.2 Non-viral vectors in vivo
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [110] Lee, 2017, Nanoparticle delivery of Cas9 ribonucleoprotein and donor DNA in vivo induces homology-directed DNA repair, Nat. Biomed. Eng. source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Ramakrishna et al. developed cell-penetrating peptide (CPP)-conjugated recombinant Cas9 protein and CPP-complexed guide RNAs for gene disruptions of CCR5 locus in human cell lines, including HEK293T, HeLa, NCCIT (a human pluripotent embryonal carcinoma cell line), human dermal fibroblasts and human embryonic stem cells.”
- Also stated in: § 4.1 Non-viral vectors in vitro and ex vivo · plain
“This system led to efficient disruptions of CCR5 gene with minimal off-target mutations [96].”
§ Non-viral delivery systems for CRISPR/Cas9-based genome editing: challenges and opportunities > 4. Current non-viral delivery vectors for CRISPR/Cas9 delivery > 4.1 Non-viral vectors in vitro and ex vivo
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [96] Ramakrishna, 2014, Gene disruption by cell-penetrating peptide-mediated delivery of Cas9 protein and guide RNA, Genome Res. source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Also stated in: § 4.1 Non-viral vectors in vitro and ex vivo · plain
In the paper
“With a single intravenous administration, this system enabled significant editing of the TTR gene in the liver of mice or rats, and resulted in a dramatic reduction (>97% for mice, >90% for rats) in serum TTR protein levels.”
§ Non-viral delivery systems for CRISPR/Cas9-based genome editing: challenges and opportunities > 4. Current non-viral delivery vectors for CRISPR/Cas9 delivery > 4.2 Non-viral vectors in vivo
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [116] Jonathan, 2018, A single administration of CRISPR/Cas9 lipid nanoparticles achieves robust and persistent in vivo genome editing, Cell Rep. source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Yin et al. combined lipid nanoparticle-mediated delivery of Cas9 mRNA with AAV encoding sgRNAs and donor templates to repair FAH gene in a mouse model of human hereditary tyrosinemia. The efficiency of correction was >6% of hepatocytes after a single application and the treatment rescued disease symptoms such as weight loss and liver damage [112].”
§ Non-viral delivery systems for CRISPR/Cas9-based genome editing: challenges and opportunities > 4. Current non-viral delivery vectors for CRISPR/Cas9 delivery > 4.2 Non-viral vectors in vivo
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [112] Yin, 2016, Therapeutic genome editing by combined viral and non-viral delivery of CRISPR system components in vivo, Nat. Biotechnol. source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“However, with the rapid development of novel biomaterials in recent years, efficient delivery of gene payloads to pass the multiple barriers under physiological conditions and promote transgene expression can be achieved.”
§ Non-viral delivery systems for CRISPR/Cas9-based genome editing: challenges and opportunities > 1. Introduction
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Nevertheless, with the rapid development of various synthetic vectors, non-viral vectors are very likely to provide unique advantages over viral vectors in these fields.”
§ Non-viral delivery systems for CRISPR/Cas9-based genome editing: challenges and opportunities > 4. Current non-viral delivery vectors for CRISPR/Cas9 delivery > 4.2 Non-viral vectors in vivo
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“It also offers the most transient functionality of genome editing cassette with reduced off-target effects and toxicity.”
§ Non-viral delivery systems for CRISPR/Cas9-based genome editing: challenges and opportunities > 3. Modes of CRISPR/Cas9 delivery
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“As an alternative, non-viral vectors may offer tantalizing possibility in CRISPR/Cas9 delivery with respect to their low immunogenicity, absence of endogenous virus recombination, less limitation in delivering larger genetic payloads and ease of large-scale production [73–75].”
§ Non-viral delivery systems for CRISPR/Cas9-based genome editing: challenges and opportunities > 1. Introduction
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [73] Pack, 2005, Design and development of polymers for gene delivery, Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. source
- Not checked yetcites [74] Li, 2007, Non-viral is superior to viral gene delivery, J. Control Release source
- Not checked yetcites [75] Li, 2015, Challenges in CRISPR/CAS9 delivery: potential roles of nonviral vectors, Hum. Gene Ther. source
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Furthermore, CRISPR/Cas9 system holds tremendous promise for gene therapy [46–51]. It can correct causal mutations in the original genome and rescue the disease phenotypes of monogenic disorders permanently, which currently represents the most translatable field in CRISPR/Cas9-mediated disease therapy.”
§ Non-viral delivery systems for CRISPR/Cas9-based genome editing: challenges and opportunities > 1. Introduction
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [46] Yin, 2014, Genome editing with Cas9 in adult mice corrects a disease mutation and phenotype, Nat. Biotechnol. source
- Not checked yetcites [47] Wu, 2013, Correction of a genetic disease in mouse via use of CRISPR-Cas9, Cell Stem Cell source
- Not checked yetcites [48] Lin, 2014, The CRISPR/Cas9 system facilitates clearance of the intrahepatic HBV templates in vivo, Mol. Ther. Nucleic Acids source
- Not checked yetcites [49] Dever, 2016, CRISPR/Cas9 β-globin gene targeting in human haematopoietic stem cells, Nature source
- Not checked yetcites [50] Gaj, 2017, In vivo genome editing improves motor function and extends survival in a mouse model of ALS, Sci. Adv. source
- Not checked yetcites [51] Bengtsson, 2017, Muscle-specific CRISPR/Cas9 dystrophin gene editing ameliorates pathophysiology in a mouse model for Duchenne muscular dystrophy, Nat. Commun. source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“However, due to the multiple functions of epigenetics, safety is a big concern that needs special attention when applying these strategies.”
§ Non-viral delivery systems for CRISPR/Cas9-based genome editing: challenges and opportunities > 4. Current non-viral delivery vectors for CRISPR/Cas9 delivery > 4.2 Non-viral vectors in vivo
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The second obstacle for plasmid-based expression is the requirement of nuclear entry for DNA transcription, which partially decreases the genome editing efficiency and also induces the delay in therapeutic efficacy.”
§ Non-viral delivery systems for CRISPR/Cas9-based genome editing: challenges and opportunities > 3. Modes of CRISPR/Cas9 delivery
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Furthermore, Cas9 mRNA delivery provides transient expression of Cas9 protein, which may be helpful for decreasing the off-target editing events.”
§ Non-viral delivery systems for CRISPR/Cas9-based genome editing: challenges and opportunities > 3. Modes of CRISPR/Cas9 delivery
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Like RNPs, Cas9 mRNA administration results in quick onset of genome editing, as Cas9 mRNA bypasses the requirement of nuclear entry for transcription.”
§ Non-viral delivery systems for CRISPR/Cas9-based genome editing: challenges and opportunities > 3. Modes of CRISPR/Cas9 delivery
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Monogenic diseases can tolerate a low initial gene editing efficiency due to the selective advantages of the corrected cells, while cancer treatment requires relatively high editing efficiency to ensure effective therapy, because the unedited cancer cells possess selective advantages and proliferate quickly.”
§ Non-viral delivery systems for CRISPR/Cas9-based genome editing: challenges and opportunities > 4. Current non-viral delivery vectors for CRISPR/Cas9 delivery > 4.2 Non-viral vectors in vivo
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“In addition, the plasmid-based expression often leads to a longer duration of Cas9 protein, which may result in higher off-target effects and strong immune responses [95].”
§ Non-viral delivery systems for CRISPR/Cas9-based genome editing: challenges and opportunities > 3. Modes of CRISPR/Cas9 delivery
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [95] Hughes, 2009, Immunogenicity of intrathecal plasmid gene delivery: cytokine release and effects on transgene expression, J. Gene Med. source
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Generally, CRISPR/Cas9 systems delivered by viral or no-viral vectors are more likely to work well in vitro and ex vivo owing to the direct interaction with cells.”
§ Non-viral delivery systems for CRISPR/Cas9-based genome editing: challenges and opportunities > 4. Current non-viral delivery vectors for CRISPR/Cas9 delivery > 4.1 Non-viral vectors in vitro and ex vivo
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“dCas9-KRAB system, recruiting a diverse array of histone modifiers that reversibly suppresses gene expression through the formation of heterochromatin, significantly reduced the expression of a series of endogenous genes in the genome [125, 128].”
§ Non-viral delivery systems for CRISPR/Cas9-based genome editing: challenges and opportunities > 4. Current non-viral delivery vectors for CRISPR/Cas9 delivery > 4.2 Non-viral vectors in vivo
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [125] Thakore, 2015, Highly specific epigenome editing by CRISPR-Cas9 repressors for silencing of distal regulatory elements, Nat. Methods source
- Not checked yetcites [128] Thakore, 2016, Editing the epigenome: technologies for programmable transcription and epigenetic modulation, Nat. Methods source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In recent years, CRISPR/Cas9 systems have been widely applied in manipulating mouse zygotes and cultured cells ex vivo and in vitro.”
§ Non-viral delivery systems for CRISPR/Cas9-based genome editing: challenges and opportunities > 4. Current non-viral delivery vectors for CRISPR/Cas9 delivery > 4.1 Non-viral vectors in vitro and ex vivo
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Generally, the particles should be nano-sized and the junction of endothelial cells has a great influence on the extravasation of these particles.”
§ Non-viral delivery systems for CRISPR/Cas9-based genome editing: challenges and opportunities > 5. Critical obstacles for non-viral delivery of CRISPR/Cas9 system
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“The molecular weight of the commonly used Cas9 protein from streptococcus pyogenes is about 160 KD, larger than that of the most proteins [89].”
§ Non-viral delivery systems for CRISPR/Cas9-based genome editing: challenges and opportunities > 5. Critical obstacles for non-viral delivery of CRISPR/Cas9 system
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [89] Subburaj, 2016, Site-directed mutagenesis in Petunia x hybrida protoplast system using direct delivery of purified recombinant Cas9 ribonucleoproteins, Plant Cell Rep. source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Following systemic administration, the elements of CRISPR/Cas9 system should remain stable before reaching its target site. Then the elements need to be effectively taken up by the targeted cell types and escape from endo-lysosome system to avoid degradation.”
§ Non-viral delivery systems for CRISPR/Cas9-based genome editing: challenges and opportunities > 5. Critical obstacles for non-viral delivery of CRISPR/Cas9 system
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“This issue is very important for targeted gene editing efficacy as well as the off-target probability in other tissues.”
§ Non-viral delivery systems for CRISPR/Cas9-based genome editing: challenges and opportunities > 5. Critical obstacles for non-viral delivery of CRISPR/Cas9 system
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“There are two main limitations of non-viral vectors-mediated CRISPR/Cas9 delivery in vivo. The first one is the serum stability of polyplexes after systemic administration [73]. The second one is the relatively low transfection efficiency in the targeted tissues after administration in vivo [76, 77].”
§ Non-viral delivery systems for CRISPR/Cas9-based genome editing: challenges and opportunities > 4. Current non-viral delivery vectors for CRISPR/Cas9 delivery > 4.2 Non-viral vectors in vivo
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [73] Pack, 2005, Design and development of polymers for gene delivery, Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. source
- Not checked yetcites [76] Mintzer, 2009, Nonviral vectors for gene delivery, Chem. Rev. source
- Not checked yetcites [77] Davis, 2002, Non-viral gene delivery systems, Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Meanwhile, native Cas9 protein is positively charged, while the conventional proteins are negatively charged [88, 97, 103, 139].”
§ Non-viral delivery systems for CRISPR/Cas9-based genome editing: challenges and opportunities > 5. Critical obstacles for non-viral delivery of CRISPR/Cas9 system
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [88] Zuris, 2015, Cationic lipid-mediated delivery of proteins enables efficient protein-based genome editing in vitro and in vivo, Nat. Biotechnol. source
- Not checked yetcites [97] Mout, 2017, Direct cytosolic delivery of CRISPR/Cas9-ribonucleoprotein for efficient gene editing, ACS Nano source
- Not checked yetcites [103] Sun, 2015, Self-assembled DNA nanoclews for the efficient delivery of CRISPR-Cas9 for genome editing, Angew Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. source
- Not checked yetcites [139] Jinek, 2014, Structures of Cas9 endonucleases reveal RNA-mediated conformational activation, Science source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“However, the effects of either siRNA or chemical inhibitor are transient and are limited to the mother cell that takes the drug. If the cell divides, these drugs will lose activity in the daughter cells.”
§ Non-viral delivery systems for CRISPR/Cas9-based genome editing: challenges and opportunities > 4. Current non-viral delivery vectors for CRISPR/Cas9 delivery > 4.2 Non-viral vectors in vivo
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“These issues are not just for non-viral vectors-mediated CRISPR/Cas9 delivery, but for non-viral vectors-mediated gene delivery in general.”
§ Non-viral delivery systems for CRISPR/Cas9-based genome editing: challenges and opportunities > 4. Current non-viral delivery vectors for CRISPR/Cas9 delivery > 4.2 Non-viral vectors in vivo
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“On the one hand, protein, plasmid and RNA are vulnerable to proteases and nucleases in the blood. They can degrade quickly in naked form in systemic circulation.”
§ Non-viral delivery systems for CRISPR/Cas9-based genome editing: challenges and opportunities > 5. Critical obstacles for non-viral delivery of CRISPR/Cas9 system
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Although the newly discovered Cas9 form from Staphylococcus aureus strain (SaCas9) is about 1 kb shorter than SpCas9, the overall genetic size is still too large for application [94, 140].”
§ Non-viral delivery systems for CRISPR/Cas9-based genome editing: challenges and opportunities > 5. Critical obstacles for non-viral delivery of CRISPR/Cas9 system
What the sources say
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“PEGylation, the most commonly used strategy to reduce the opsonization and minimize the clearance by RES, may also be applicable for non-viral vectors-mediated CRISPR/Cas9 delivery [144, 145].”
§ Non-viral delivery systems for CRISPR/Cas9-based genome editing: challenges and opportunities > 5. Critical obstacles for non-viral delivery of CRISPR/Cas9 system
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [144] Ogris, 1999, PEGylated DNA/transferrin-PEI complexes: reduced interaction with blood components, extended circulation in blood and potential for systemic gene delivery, Gene Ther. source
- Not checked yetcites [145] Malam, 2011, Current trends in the application of nanoparticles in drug delivery, Curr. Med. Chem. source
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“In the past decades, there have been extensive efforts on facilitating particles accumulation in the targeted tissues for non-viral delivery vectors-mediated gene therapy [155, 156].”
§ Non-viral delivery systems for CRISPR/Cas9-based genome editing: challenges and opportunities > 5. Critical obstacles for non-viral delivery of CRISPR/Cas9 system
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [155] Liu, 2017, Tumor associated macrophage-targeted microRNA delivery with dual-responsive polypeptide nanovectors for anti-cancer therapy, Biomaterials source
- Not checked yetcites [156] Li, 2017, Targeted Co-delivery of PTX and TR3 siRNA by PTP peptide modified dendrimer for the treatment of pancreatic cancer, Small
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Additionally, surface decorating active targeting ligands on the vectors should be another effective method to promote targeted accumulation via receptor-mediated recognition.”
§ Non-viral delivery systems for CRISPR/Cas9-based genome editing: challenges and opportunities > 5. Critical obstacles for non-viral delivery of CRISPR/Cas9 system
plainconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
- The authors state this as an assumption: Strategies for facilitating particle accumulation in targeted tissues for non-viral delivery vectors-mediated gene therapy can also be applied to non-viral vectors-mediated CRISPR/Cas9 genome editing.
In the paper
“Liu et al. fabricated pH-responsive poly(D,L-lactic-co-glycolic acid) (PLGA) nanoparticles encapsulating ammonium bicarbonate (NH4HCO3) to trigger antigen release from endo-lysosomes. NH4HCO3 interacted with protons in endo-lysosomes, then produced CO2 and NH3 to disrupt the endo-lysosomes and promote antigen release into the cytosol [183].”
§ Non-viral delivery systems for CRISPR/Cas9-based genome editing: challenges and opportunities > 5. Critical obstacles for non-viral delivery of CRISPR/Cas9 system
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [183] Liu, 2015, pH-responsive poly(D,L-lactic-co-glycolic acid) nanoparticles with rapid antigen release behavior promote immune response, ACS Nano source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“One underlying mechanism is these peptides undergo a structural transformation from a random coil to an α-helical conformation in lower pH environments, thus promoting endosomal fusion.”
§ Non-viral delivery systems for CRISPR/Cas9-based genome editing: challenges and opportunities > 5. Critical obstacles for non-viral delivery of CRISPR/Cas9 system
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“For CRISPR/Cas9-based plasmids, they need to overcome more barriers than that of CRISPR RNPs and mRNA. They have to enter the nucleus for transcription and traffic back to the cytosol for translation.”
§ Non-viral delivery systems for CRISPR/Cas9-based genome editing: challenges and opportunities > 5. Critical obstacles for non-viral delivery of CRISPR/Cas9 system
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Due to the threshold for rapid renal excretion being about 5.5 nm, the hydrodynamic diameters of the prepared nanoparticles need to be larger than this size [168–170].”
§ Non-viral delivery systems for CRISPR/Cas9-based genome editing: challenges and opportunities > 5. Critical obstacles for non-viral delivery of CRISPR/Cas9 system
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [168] Choi, 2007, Renal clearance of quantum dots, Nat. Biotechnol. source
- Not checked yetcites [169] Longmire, 2008, Clearance properties of nano-sized particles and molecules as imaging agents: considerations and caveats, Nanomedicine (Lond) source
- Not checked yetcites [170] Choi, 2010, Design considerations for tumour-targeted nanoparticles, Nat. Nanotechnol. source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The fifth encountered obstacle is the phagocytic clearance, blockage of RES in targeted tissues especially in liver and spleen, and the negatively charged components of extracellular matrix.”
§ Non-viral delivery systems for CRISPR/Cas9-based genome editing: challenges and opportunities > 5. Critical obstacles for non-viral delivery of CRISPR/Cas9 system
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Nanoparticles smaller than 9 nm can passively diffuse through nuclear pore complexes (NPCs), while larger ones requiring the assistance of import proteins (e.g., importins) to actively shuttle them into the nucleus [73].”
§ Non-viral delivery systems for CRISPR/Cas9-based genome editing: challenges and opportunities > 5. Critical obstacles for non-viral delivery of CRISPR/Cas9 system
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [73] Pack, 2005, Design and development of polymers for gene delivery, Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Some studies have shown that hyperthermia can increase the membrane permeability of compounds and enhance cellular uptake. But the temperature and duration of this approach need to be carefully controlled.”
§ Non-viral delivery systems for CRISPR/Cas9-based genome editing: challenges and opportunities > 5. Critical obstacles for non-viral delivery of CRISPR/Cas9 system
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“To balance the effect of penetration and renal excretion, environmental stimuli-responsive size changeable tactics would be a possible compromising solution.”
§ Non-viral delivery systems for CRISPR/Cas9-based genome editing: challenges and opportunities > 5. Critical obstacles for non-viral delivery of CRISPR/Cas9 system
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“It seems like that the cationic lipid-based vectors were one of the most effective delivery approaches for CRISPR/Cas9 system to date. But it is mainly limited to local administration.”
§ Non-viral delivery systems for CRISPR/Cas9-based genome editing: challenges and opportunities > 6. Perspectives
hedgedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: unclear — It is unclear why the paper says it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Meanwhile, different cell types or targeted genes can also affect the efficiency of the CRISPR/Cas9 system [93, 199].”
§ Non-viral delivery systems for CRISPR/Cas9-based genome editing: challenges and opportunities > 6. Perspectives
What the sources say
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“NLSs can be recognized by importin α, the nuclear import receptor, and trigger the subsequent transportation from the cytosol to the nucleus [198].”
§ Non-viral delivery systems for CRISPR/Cas9-based genome editing: challenges and opportunities > 5. Critical obstacles for non-viral delivery of CRISPR/Cas9 system
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [198] Fontes, 2000, Structural basis of recognition of monopartite and bipartite nuclear localization sequences by mammalian importin-α, J. Mol. Biol. source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Next, the efficiency will also need to be improved for in vivo application, especially in correcting majority of genetic disorders.”
§ Non-viral delivery systems for CRISPR/Cas9-based genome editing: challenges and opportunities > 6. Perspectives
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Moreover, unlike commonly delivery approaches for siRNA or protein, whose action site is in the cytosol, CRISPR/Cas9 systems must be delivered to the nucleus to initiate genome editing in the chromosome.”
§ Non-viral delivery systems for CRISPR/Cas9-based genome editing: challenges and opportunities > 6. Perspectives
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“For the former off-target effects, tissue-specific promoters in CRISPR/Cas9-based plasmid have been introduced into the system to partially solve this problem.”
§ Non-viral delivery systems for CRISPR/Cas9-based genome editing: challenges and opportunities > 6. Perspectives
plainconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Most NLSs are characterized by short basic and cationic peptide sequences.”
§ Non-viral delivery systems for CRISPR/Cas9-based genome editing: challenges and opportunities > 5. Critical obstacles for non-viral delivery of CRISPR/Cas9 system
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“However, the specificity of this technology will need to be further improved to decrease the potential off-target probability for increasing safety.”
§ Non-viral delivery systems for CRISPR/Cas9-based genome editing: challenges and opportunities > 6. Perspectives
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Meanwhile, targeted delivery of CRISPR/Cas9 system by tissue-specific AAV type or non-viral vectors could be another effective solution to this issue.”
§ Non-viral delivery systems for CRISPR/Cas9-based genome editing: challenges and opportunities > 6. Perspectives
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The latter would particularly benefit from non-viral vectors.”
§ Non-viral delivery systems for CRISPR/Cas9-based genome editing: challenges and opportunities > 6. Perspectives
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In addition, proper selection of the targeting site, rational design of sgRNA and using paired Cas9 nickases could be effective approaches to alleviate the latter off-target effects.”
§ Non-viral delivery systems for CRISPR/Cas9-based genome editing: challenges and opportunities > 6. Perspectives
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“These issues may be resolved by enhancing activity and delivery efficiency of the CRISPR-Cas9 system.”
§ Non-viral delivery systems for CRISPR/Cas9-based genome editing: challenges and opportunities > 6. Perspectives
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence.
The authors state this as an assumption.
Strategies for facilitating particle accumulation in targeted tissues for non-viral delivery vectors-mediated gene therapy can also be applied to non-viral vectors-mediated CRISPR/Cas9 genome editing.
“We assume that these strategies can also be applied to non-viral vectors-mediated CRISPR/Cas9 genome editing.”
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Firstly, genome editing components must reach the cell nucleus to achieve therapeutic effects. Thus, extracellular and intracellular barriers need to be overcome, including avoiding enzymatic degradation in the blood, circumventing clearance by the reticuloendothelial system (RES), penetrating cell membranes, escaping endosome entrapment, and infiltrating nuclear membranes.”
From RNA delivery biomaterials for the treatment of genetic and rare diseases (2019) · cites this paper as [208]
In the citing paper
“Secondly, the complexity and large molecular weight of these components are significant challenges for delivery materials.”
From RNA delivery biomaterials for the treatment of genetic and rare diseases (2019) · cites this paper as [208]
In the citing paper
“Thirdly, genome editing components should be delivered to target tissues and edit specific sequences in a controllable manner to prevent off-target events and immune responses.”
From RNA delivery biomaterials for the treatment of genetic and rare diseases (2019) · cites this paper as [208]
In the citing paper
“These materials are similar to those used for mRNA delivery.[202, 205, 207–211]”
From RNA delivery biomaterials for the treatment of genetic and rare diseases (2019) · cites this paper as [208]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.
Rated minor: it would not touch a result — a value no result rests on, a p-value that stays on the same side of the significance level, or a conflict that is clerical, resolved elsewhere in the paper, or outside its own findings.
In the paper
§ Non-viral delivery systems for CRISPR/Cas9-based genome editing: challenges and opportunities > 4. Current non-viral delivery vectors for CRISPR/Cas9 delivery > 4.2 Non-viral vectors in vivo
“Zuris et al. injected Cas9:sgRNA complexes targeting GFP gene into the cochlea of transgenic Atoh1-GFP mice. This system resulted in ~20% Cas9-mediated genome modification in hair cells [69].”
§ Non-viral delivery systems for CRISPR/Cas9-based genome editing: challenges and opportunities > References
“69. Lehrman S Virus treatment questioned after gene therapy death Nature 401 1999 517 518 10524611”
Citations
Cites
1 retracted
RETRACTED ARTICLE: A mechanism for the suppression of homologous recombination in G1 cells
Orthwein, A., Noordermeer, S. M., Wilson, M. D., Landry, S., Enchev, R. I., Sherker, A., Munro, M., Pinder, J., Salsman, J., Dellaire, G., et al. (2015) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature16142 · Cited by 471
RetractedA Programmable Dual-RNA–Guided DNA Endonuclease in Adaptive Bacterial Immunity
Jinek, M., Chylinski, K., Fonfara, I., Hauer, M., Doudna, J. A., & Charpentier, E. (2012) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1225829 · Cited by 17,116
Multiplex Genome Engineering Using CRISPR/Cas Systems
Cong, L., Ran, F. A., Cox, D., Lin, S., Barretto, R., Habib, N., Hsu, P. D., Wu, X., Jiang, W., Marraffini, L. A., et al. (2013) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1231143 · Cited by 15,339
Genome engineering using the CRISPR-Cas9 system
Ran, F. A., Hsu, P. D., Wright, J., Agarwala, V., Scott, D. A., & Zhang, F. (2013) · Nature Protocols · doi:10.1038/nprot.2013.143 · Cited by 11,133
RNA-Guided Human Genome Engineering via Cas9
Mali, P., Yang, L., Esvelt, K. M., Aach, J., Guell, M., DiCarlo, J. E., Norville, J. E., & Church, G. M. (2013) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1232033 · Cited by 9,210
Nanocarriers as an emerging platform for cancer therapy
Peer, D., Karp, J. M., Hong, S., Farokhzad, O. C., Margalit, R., & Langer, R. (2007) · Nature Nanotechnology · doi:10.1038/nnano.2007.387 · Cited by 8,710
CRISPR Provides Acquired Resistance Against Viruses in Prokaryotes
Barrangou, R., Fremaux, C., Deveau, H., Richards, M., Boyaval, P., Moineau, S., Romero, D. A., & Horvath, P. (2007) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1138140 · Cited by 5,947
Development and Applications of CRISPR-Cas9 for Genome Engineering
Hsu, P. D., Lander, E. S., & Zhang, F. (2014) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2014.05.010 · Cited by 5,762
Genome-scale CRISPR-Cas9 knockout screening in human cells
Shalem, O., Sanjana, N. E., Hartenian, E., Shi, X., Scott, D. A., Mikkelsen, T. S., Heckl, D., Ebert, B. L., Root, D. E., Doench, J. G., et al. (2014) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1247005 · Cited by 5,234
Repurposing CRISPR as an RNA-Guided Platform for Sequence-Specific Control of Gene Expression
Qi, L. S., Larson, M. H., Gilbert, L. A., Doudna, J. A., Weissman, J. S., Arkin, A. P., & Lim, W. A. (2013) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2013.02.022 · Cited by 5,016
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Fang, J., Islam, W., & Maeda, H. (2020) · Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.addr.2020.06.005 · Cited by 757
Emerging blood–brain-barrier-crossing nanotechnology for brain cancer theranostics
Tang, W., Fan, W., Lau, J., Deng, L., Shen, Z., & Chen, X. S. (2019) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/c8cs00805a · Cited by 610
Self-citationRecent advancements in liposome technology
Filipczak, N., Pan, J., Yalamarty, S. S. K., & Torchilin, V. P. (2020) · Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.addr.2020.06.022 · Cited by 611
Wei, T., Cheng, Q., Min, Y.-L., Olson, E. N., & Siegwart, D. J. (2020) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-020-17029-3 · Cited by 615
Base editing: advances and therapeutic opportunities
Porto, E. M., Komor, A. C., Slaymaker, I. M., & Yeo, G. W.-M. (2020) · Nature Reviews Drug Discovery · doi:10.1038/s41573-020-0084-6 · Cited by 499
Strategies in the delivery of Cas9 ribonucleoprotein for CRISPR/Cas9 genome editing
Zhang, S., Shen, J., Li, D., & Cheng, Y. (2021) · Theranostics · doi:10.7150/thno.47007 · Cited by 430
Polymeric Delivery of Therapeutic Nucleic Acids
Kumar, R., Chalarca, C. F. S., Bockman, M. R., Bruggen, C. V., Grimme, C. J., Dalal, R. J., Hanson, M. G., Hexum, J. K., & Reineke, T. M. (2021) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.0c00997 · Cited by 379
A biodegradable nanocapsule delivers a Cas9 ribonucleoprotein complex for in vivo genome editing
Chen, G., Abdeen, A. A., Wang, Y., Shahi, P. K., Robertson, S., Xie, R., Suzuki, M., Pattnaik, B. R., Saha, K., & Gong, S. (2019) · Nature Nanotechnology · doi:10.1038/s41565-019-0539-2 · Cited by 361
Andra, V. V. S. N. L., Pammi, S. V. N., Bhatraju, L. V. K. P., & Ruddaraju, L. K. (2022) · BioNanoScience · doi:10.1007/s12668-022-00941-x · Cited by 327
Nanotechnology-based delivery of CRISPR/Cas9 for cancer treatment
Xu, X., Liu, C., Wang, Y., Koivisto, O., Zhou, J., Shu, Y., & Zhang, H. (2021) · Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.addr.2021.113891 · Cited by 300
The delivery challenge: fulfilling the promise of therapeutic genome editing
van Haasteren, J., Li, J., Scheideler, O. J., Murthy, N., & Schaffer, D. V. (2020) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/s41587-020-0565-5 · Cited by 285
Mustafa, M. I., & Makhawi, A. M. (2020) · Journal of Clinical Microbiology · doi:10.1128/jcm.00745-20 · Cited by 246
RetractedZou, Y., Sun, X., Yang, Q., Zheng, M., Shimoni, O., Ruan, W., Wang, Y., Zhang, D., Yin, J., Huang, X., et al. (2022) · Science Advances · doi:10.1126/sciadv.abm8011 · Cited by 227
Gene Therapy in Cancer Treatment: Why Go Nano?
Roma‐Rodrigues, C., Rivas‐García, L., Baptista, P. V., & Fernandes, A. R. (2020) · Pharmaceutics · doi:10.3390/pharmaceutics12030233 · Cited by 228
Exosome-mediated delivery of CRISPR/Cas9 for targeting of oncogenic Kras G12D in pancreatic cancer
McAndrews, K. M., Xiao, F., Chronopoulos, A., LeBleu, V. S., Kugeratski, F. G., & Kalluri, R. (2021) · Life Science Alliance · doi:10.26508/lsa.202000875 · Cited by 216
Advances in Universal CAR-T Cell Therapy
Lin, H., Cheng, J., Mu, W., Zhou, J., & Zhu, L. (2021) · Frontiers in Immunology · doi:10.3389/fimmu.2021.744823 · Cited by 215
Rational designs of in vivo CRISPR-Cas delivery systems
Xu, C., Chen, G., Luo, Y., Zhang, Y., Zhao, G., Lu, Z.-D., Czarna, A., Gu, Z., & Wang, J. (2019) · Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.addr.2019.11.005 · Cited by 187
Advantage of Nanotechnology-Based Genome Editing System and Its Application in Crop Improvement
Ahmar, S., Mahmood, T., Fiaz, S., Mora, F., Shafique, M. S., Chattha, M. S., & Jung, K.-H. (2021) · Frontiers in Plant Science · doi:10.3389/fpls.2021.663849 · Cited by 186
Wei, T., Sun, Y., Cheng, Q., Chatterjee, S., Traylor, Z., Johnson, L. T., Coquelin, M. L., Wang, J., Torres, M. J., Lian, X., et al. (2023) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-023-42948-2 · Cited by 207
Functionalized lipid-like nanoparticles for in vivo mRNA delivery and base editing
Zhang, X., Zhao, W., Nguyen, G. N., Zhang, C., Zeng, C., Yan, J., Du, S., Hou, X., Li, W., Jiang, J., et al. (2020) · Science Advances · doi:10.1126/sciadv.abc2315 · Cited by 184
Applications and challenges of CRISPR-Cas gene-editing to disease treatment in clinics
Liu, W., Li, L., Jiang, J., Wu, M., & Lin, P. (2021) · Precision Clinical Medicine · doi:10.1093/pcmedi/pbab014 · Cited by 196
Self-citationHan, X., Alu, A., Liu, H., Shi, Y., Wei, X., Cai, L., & Wei, Y. (2022) · Bioactive Materials · doi:10.1016/j.bioactmat.2022.01.011 · Cited by 165
CRISPR/Cas: Advances, Limitations, and Applications for Precision Cancer Research
Yang, Y., Xu, J., Ge, S., & Lai, L. (2021) · Frontiers in Medicine · doi:10.3389/fmed.2021.649896 · Cited by 167
Li, L., Yáng, Z., Zhu, S., He, L., Fan, W., Tang, W., Zou, J., Shen, Z., Zhang, M., Tang, L., et al. (2019) · Advanced Materials · doi:10.1002/adma.201901187 · Cited by 146
Self-citationDelivery of CRISPR/Cas9 for therapeutic genome editing
Xu, X., Wan, T., Xin, H., Li, D., Pan, H., Wu, J., & Ping, Y. (2019) · The Journal of Gene Medicine · doi:10.1002/jgm.3107 · Cited by 134
Wei, T., Cheng, Q., Farbiak, L., Anderson, D. G., Langer, R., & Siegwart, D. J. (2020) · ACS Nano · doi:10.1021/acsnano.0c04707 · Cited by 143
Guo, J., Wan, T. Y., Li, B., Pan, Q., Xin, H., Qiu, Y., & Yuan, P. (2021) · ACS Central Science · doi:10.1021/acscentsci.0c01648 · Cited by 134
Nanoparticle-Based Delivery of CRISPR/Cas9 Genome-Editing Therapeutics
Givens, B. E., Naguib, Y. W., Geary, S. M., Devor, E. J., & Salem, A. K. (2018) · The AAPS Journal · doi:10.1208/s12248-018-0267-9 · Cited by 133
CRISPR/Cas9 systems: Delivery technologies and biomedical applications
Du, Y., Liu, Y., Hu, J., Peng, X., & Liu, Z. (2023) · Asian Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.ajps.2023.100854 · Cited by 140
Rohiwal, S. S., Dvořáková, N., Klı́ma, J., Vaškovičová, M., Šenigl, F., Šlouf, M., Pavlová, E., Štěpánek, P., Babuka, D., Beneš, H., et al. (2020) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-020-61465-6 · Cited by 124
A new age of precision gene therapy
Schambach, A., Buchholz, C. J., Torres-Ruiz, R., Cichutek, K., Morgan, M. A., Trapani, I., & Büning, H. (2023) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(23)01952-9 · Cited by 135
Guo, P., Yang, J., Huang, J., Auguste, D. T., & Moses, M. A. (2019) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1904697116 · Cited by 112
Sharpening the Molecular Scissors: Advances in Gene-Editing Technology
Broeders, M., Herrero-Hernandez, P., Ernst, M. P. T., van der Ploeg, A. T., & Pijnappel, W. W. M. P. (2019) · iScience · doi:10.1016/j.isci.2019.100789 · Cited by 114
CRISPR technologies for stem cell engineering and regenerative medicine
Hsu, M., Chang, Y., Truong, V. A., Lai, P., Nguyen, T. K. N., & Hu, Y. (2019) · Biotechnology Advances · doi:10.1016/j.biotechadv.2019.107447 · Cited by 106
All‐In‐One Dendrimer‐Based Lipid Nanoparticles Enable Precise HDR‐Mediated Gene Editing In Vivo
Farbiak, L., Cheng, Q., Wei, T., Álvarez‐Benedicto, E., Johnson, L. T., Lee, S. M., & Siegwart, D. J. (2021) · Advanced Materials · doi:10.1002/adma.202006619 · Cited by 103
Permanent Inactivation of HBV Genomes by CRISPR/Cas9-Mediated Non-cleavage Base Editing
Yang, Y.-C., Chen, Y., Kao, J., Ching, C., Liu, I.-J., Wang, C.-C., Tsai, C.-H., Wu, F., Liu, C., Chen, P., et al. (2020) · Molecular Therapy — Nucleic Acids · doi:10.1016/j.omtn.2020.03.005 · Cited by 101
CRISPR/Cas9 Delivery System Engineering for Genome Editing in Therapeutic Applications
Cheng, H., Zhang, F., & Ding, Y. (2021) · Pharmaceutics · doi:10.3390/pharmaceutics13101649 · Cited by 100
Biomaterials as vectors for the delivery of CRISPR–Cas9
Eoh, J. H., & Gu, L. (2019) · Biomaterials Science · doi:10.1039/c8bm01310a · Cited by 92
Non-viral gene therapy using multifunctional nanoparticles: Status, challenges, and opportunities
Lin, G., Li, L., Panwar, N., Wang, J., Tjin, S. C., Wang, X., & Yong, K. (2018) · Coordination Chemistry Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.ccr.2018.07.001 · Cited by 88
Self-citationBiomaterials-mediated CRISPR/Cas9 delivery: recent challenges and opportunities in gene therapy
Dubey, A. K., & Mostafavi, E. (2023) · Frontiers in Chemistry · doi:10.3389/fchem.2023.1259435 · Cited by 96
A DNA Origami‐Based Gene Editing System for Efficient Gene Therapy in Vivo
Tang, W., Tong, T., Wang, H., Lu, X., Yang, C., Wu, Y., Wang, Y., Liu, J., & Ding, B. (2023) · Angewandte Chemie International Edition · doi:10.1002/anie.202315093 · Cited by 89
Zhao, M., Cheng, X., Shao, P., Yao, D., Wu, Y., Xiao, L., Cui, Z., Sun, X., Gao, C., Chen, J., et al. (2024) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-024-44941-9 · Cited by 92
RNA delivery biomaterials for the treatment of genetic and rare diseases
Zhao, W., Hou, X., Vick, O. G., & Dong, Y. (2019) · Biomaterials · doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2019.119291 · Cited by 82
Harnessing nanoparticles for the efficient delivery of the CRISPR/Cas9 system
Rahimi, H., Salehiabar, M., Charmi, J., Barsbay, M., Ghaffarlou, M., Razlighi, M. R., Davaran, S., Khalilov, R. I., Sugiyama, M., Nosrati, H., et al. (2020) · Nano Today · doi:10.1016/j.nantod.2020.100895 · Cited by 83
Recent advances in the delivery and applications of nonviral CRISPR/Cas9 gene editing
Sinclair, F., Begum, A. A., Dai, C. C., Tóth, I., & Moyle, P. M. (2023) · Drug Delivery and Translational Research · doi:10.1007/s13346-023-01320-z · Cited by 91
Soltanmohammadi, F., Gharehbaba, A. M., Zangi, A. R., Adibkia, K., & Javadzadeh, Y. (2024) · Biomedicine & Pharmacotherapy · doi:10.1016/j.biopha.2024.117248 · Cited by 87
Exosomes as Targeted Delivery Platform of CRISPR/Cas9 for Therapeutic Genome Editing
Duan, L., Ouyang, K., Wang, J., Xu, L., Xu, X., Wen, C., Xie, Y., Liang, Y., & Xia, J. (2021) · ChemBioChem · doi:10.1002/cbic.202100359 · Cited by 82
Recent advances in liposome formulations for breast cancer therapeutics
Yang, B., Song, B.-P., Shankar, S., Guller, A., & Deng, W. (2021) · Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences · doi:10.1007/s00018-021-03850-6 · Cited by 82
Controlled CRISPR‐Cas9 Ribonucleoprotein Delivery for Sensitized Photothermal Therapy
Chen, C., Ma, Y., Du, S., Wu, Y., Shen, P., Yan, T., Li, X., Song, Y., Zha, Z., & Han, X. (2021) · Small · doi:10.1002/smll.202101155 · Cited by 80
Qiao, J., Sun, W., Lin, S., Jin, R., Ma, L., & Liu, Y. (2019) · Chemical Communications · doi:10.1039/c9cc00010k · Cited by 80
Sahel, D. K., Vora, L. K., Saraswat, A. L., Sharma, S., Monpara, J. D., D’souza, A. A., Mishra, D., Tryphena, K. P., Kawakita, S., Khan, S. U., et al. (2023) · Advanced Science · doi:10.1002/advs.202207512 · Cited by 79
Synthetic multi-layer nanoparticles for CRISPR-Cas9 genome editing
Tang, H., Zhao, X., & Jiang, X. (2020) · Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.addr.2020.03.001 · Cited by 80
Yan, T., Yang, K., Chen, C., Zhou, Z., Shen, P., Jia, Y., Yu, X. M., Zhang, Z., Shen, X., & Han, X. (2021) · Biomaterials · doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2021.121233 · Cited by 77
Precise genome-editing in human diseases: mechanisms, strategies and applications
Zheng, Y., Li, Y., Zhou, K., Li, T., VanDusen, N. J., & Hua, Y. (2024) · Signal Transduction and Targeted Therapy · doi:10.1038/s41392-024-01750-2 · Cited by 91
Gene Editing by Extracellular Vesicles
Kostyushev, D. S., Kostyusheva, A., Brezgin, S., Vv, S., Volchkova, E. V., Lukashev, A. N., & Chulanov, V. (2020) · International Journal of Molecular Sciences · doi:10.3390/ijms21197362 · Cited by 75
Han, X., Alameh, M., Xu, Y., Palanki, R., El-Mayta, R. D., Dwivedi, G., Swingle, K. L., Xu, J., Gong, N., Xue, L., et al. (2024) · Nature Biomedical Engineering · doi:10.1038/s41551-024-01267-7 · Cited by 78
RNA Therapeutics - Research and Clinical Advancements
Feng, R., Patil, S., Zhao, X., Miao, Z., & Qian, A. (2021) · Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences · doi:10.3389/fmolb.2021.710738 · Cited by 75
Advancing CRISPR genome editing into gene therapy clinical trials: progress and future prospects
Cetin, B., Erendor, F., Ekşi, Y. E., Şanlioğlu, A. D., & Şanlıoğlu, S. (2025) · Expert Reviews in Molecular Medicine · doi:10.1017/erm.2025.10 · Cited by 80
Nanotechnology based CRISPR/Cas9 system delivery for genome editing: Progress and prospect
Deng, H., Huang, W., & Zhang, Z. (2019) · Nano Research · doi:10.1007/s12274-019-2465-x · Cited by 70
Harnessing lipid nanoparticles for efficient CRISPR delivery
Yan, J., Kang, D. D., & Dong, Y. (2021) · Biomaterials Science · doi:10.1039/d1bm00537e · Cited by 69
Therapeutic potentials of CRISPR-Cas genome editing technology in human viral infections
Najafi, S., Tan, S. C., Aghamiri, S., Raee, P., Ebrahimi, Z., Jahromi, Z. K., Rahmati, Y., Nahand, J. S., Piroozmand, A., Jajarmi, V., et al. (2022) · Biomedicine & Pharmacotherapy · doi:10.1016/j.biopha.2022.112743 · Cited by 69
Allemailem, K. S., Alsahli, M. A., Almatroudi, A., Alrumaihi, F., Alkhaleefah, F. K., Rahmani, A. H., & Khan, A. A. (2022) · 癌症:英文版 · doi:10.1002/cac2.12366 · Cited by 69
Improved Delivery of CRISPR/Cas9 System Using Magnetic Nanoparticles into Porcine Fibroblast
Hryhorowicz, M., Grześkowiak, B. F., Ryczek, N., Śledziński, P., Lipiński, D., & Słomski, R. (2018) · Molecular Biotechnology · doi:10.1007/s12033-018-0145-9 · Cited by 67
Hsu, M., Huang, K.-L., Yu, F.-J., Lai, P., Truong, V. A., Lin, M., Nguyen, N. T. K., Shen, C., Hwang, S., Chang, Y., et al. (2019) · Molecular Therapy · doi:10.1016/j.ymthe.2019.11.029 · Cited by 67
Application of Non-Viral Vectors in Drug Delivery and Gene Therapy
Ren, S., Wang, M., Wang, C., Wang, Y., Sun, C., Zeng, Z., Cui, H., & Zhao, X. (2021) · Polymers · doi:10.3390/polym13193307 · Cited by 69
Engineered Nanomaterials to Potentiate CRISPR/Cas9 Gene Editing for Cancer Therapy
Yi, K., Kong, H., Lao, Y., Li, D., Mintz, R. L., Fang, T., Chen, G., Tao, Y., Li, M., & Ding, J. (2023) · Advanced Materials · doi:10.1002/adma.202300665 · Cited by 66
Xu, W., Zhang, S., Qin, H., & Yao, K. (2024) · Journal of Translational Medicine · doi:10.1186/s12967-024-05957-3 · Cited by 74
Engineered exosomes: a promising drug delivery platform with therapeutic potential
Schwarz, G., Ren, X., Xie, W., Guo, H., Jiang, Y. H., & Zhang, J. (2025) · Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences · doi:10.3389/fmolb.2025.1583992 · Cited by 74
Nanovehicles for Plant Modifications towards Pest- and Disease-Resistance Traits
Kumar, S., Nehra, M., Dilbaghi, N., Marrazza, G., Tuteja, S. K., & Kim, K. (2019) · Trends in Plant Science · doi:10.1016/j.tplants.2019.10.007 · Cited by 66
CRISPR-Cas9-Based Technology and Its Relevance to Gene Editing in Parkinson’s Disease
Rahman, M. U., Bilal, M., Shah, J. A., Kaushik, A. K., Teissèdre, P., & Kujawska, M. (2022) · Pharmaceutics · doi:10.3390/pharmaceutics14061252 · Cited by 65
Encapsulating Cas9 into extracellular vesicles by protein myristoylation
Whitley, J. A., Kim, S., Lou, L., Ye, C., Alsaidan, O. A., Sulejmani, E., Cai, J., Desrochers, E., Beharry, Z. M., Rickman, C. B., et al. (2022) · Journal of Extracellular Vesicles · doi:10.1002/jev2.12196 · Cited by 61
Li, Y., & Champion, J. A. (2022) · Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.addr.2022.114462 · Cited by 65
Shen, Y., Cohen, J. L., Nicoloro, S. M. C., Kelly, M., Yenilmez, B., Henriques, F. D. S., Tsagkaraki, E., Edwards, Y. J. K., Hu, X., Friedline, R. H., et al. (2018) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1074/jbc.ra118.004554 · Cited by 61
Kostyushev, D. S., Kostyusheva, A., Brezgin, S., Zarifyan, D., Utkina, A., Goptar, I. A., & Chulanov, V. (2019) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-019-38526-6 · Cited by 62
Engineering Biomaterials with Micro/Nanotechnologies for Cell Reprogramming
Fang, J., Hsueh, Y., Soto, J., Sun, W., Wang, J., Gu, Z., Khademhosseini, A., & Li, S. (2020) · ACS Nano · doi:10.1021/acsnano.9b04837 · Cited by 61
Chou, S., Yang, P., Ban, Q., Yang, Y. P., Wang, M., Chien, C., Chen, S. J., Sun, N., Zhu, Y., Liu, H., et al. (2020) · Advanced Science · doi:10.1002/advs.201903432 · Cited by 62
CRISPR/Cas9-Based Antiviral Strategy: Current Status and the Potential Challenge
Lee, C.-H. (2019) · Molecules · doi:10.3390/molecules24071349 · Cited by 64
How Far Are Non-Viral Vectors to Come of Age and Reach Clinical Translation in Gene Therapy?
Sainz-Ramos, M., Gallego, I., Villate-Beitia, I., Sesma, J. Z., Maldonado, I., Puras, G., & Pedraz, J. L. (2021) · International Journal of Molecular Sciences · doi:10.3390/ijms22147545 · Cited by 67
CRISPR/Cas9 system: a reliable and facile genome editing tool in modern biology
Javaid, D., Ganie, S. Y., Hajam, Y. A., & Reshi, M. S. (2022) · Molecular Biology Reports · doi:10.1007/s11033-022-07880-6 · Cited by 65
The CRISPR/Cas9 System Delivered by Extracellular Vesicles
Zhu, X., Gao, M., Yang, Y., Li, W., Bao, J., & Li, Y. (2023) · Pharmaceutics · doi:10.3390/pharmaceutics15030984 · Cited by 61
Nanobiomaterial vectors for improving gene editing and gene therapy
Hu, S. W., Ding, T., Tang, H., Guo, H., Cui, W., & Shu, Y. (2023) · Materials Today · doi:10.1016/j.mattod.2023.04.011 · Cited by 58
Self-citationProgress and challenges towards CRISPR/Cas clinical translation
Rosenblum, D., Gutkin, A., Dammes, N., & Peer, D. (2020) · Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.addr.2020.07.004 · Cited by 61
Non-Viral Vector-Mediated Gene Therapy for ALS: Challenges and Future Perspectives
Ediriweera, G. R., Chen, L., Yerbury, J. J., Thurecht, K. J., & Vine, K. L. (2021) · Molecular Pharmaceutics · doi:10.1021/acs.molpharmaceut.1c00297 · Cited by 59
Stimuli-responsive nanoformulations for CRISPR-Cas9 genome editing
Fang, T., Cao, X., Ibnat, M., & Chen, G. (2022) · Journal of Nanobiotechnology · doi:10.1186/s12951-022-01570-y · Cited by 63
Hosseini, E. S., Nikkhah, M., & Hosseinkhani, S. (2019) · International Journal of Nanomedicine · doi:10.2147/ijn.s199104 · Cited by 57
AL Qtaish, N., Gallego, I., Villate-Beitia, I., Sainz-Ramos, M., López-Méndez, T. B., Grijalvo, S., Eritja, R., Soto-Sánchez, C., Martínez-Navarrete, G., Fernández, E., et al. (2020) · Pharmaceutics · doi:10.3390/pharmaceutics12030198 · Cited by 57
Opportunity and challenges for nanotechnology application for genome editing in plants
Vats, S., Kumawat, S., Brar, J., Kaur, S., Yadav, K., Magar, S., Jadhav, P. V., Salvi, P., Sonah, H., Sharma, S. B., et al. (2022) · Plant Nano Biology · doi:10.1016/j.plana.2022.100001 · Cited by 57
Foley, R. A., Sims, R. A., Duggan, E. C., Olmedo, J. K., Ma, R., & Jonas, S. J. (2022) · Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology · doi:10.3389/fbioe.2022.973326 · Cited by 60
CRISPR/Cas9 Delivery Systems to Enhance Gene Editing Efficiency
Seijas, A., Cora, D., Novo, M., Al‐Soufi, W., Sanchez, L. E., & Arana, Á. J. (2025) · International Journal of Molecular Sciences · doi:10.3390/ijms26094420 · Cited by 68
CRISPR/Cas mediated epigenome editing for cancer therapy
Ansari, I., Chaturvedi, A., Chitkara, D., & Singh, S. P. (2021) · Seminars in Cancer Biology · doi:10.1016/j.semcancer.2020.12.018 · Cited by 58
In vivo delivery of CRISPR-Cas9 genome editing components for therapeutic applications
Huang, K. L., Zapata, D. A., Tang, Y., Teng, Y., & Li, Y. (2022) · Biomaterials · doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2022.121876 · Cited by 61
Intelligent nanotherapeutic strategies for the delivery of CRISPR system
Chen, C., Zhong, W., Du, S., Li, Y., Zeng, Y., Liu, K., Yang, J., Guan, X., & Han, X. (2022) · Acta Pharmaceutica Sinica B · doi:10.1016/j.apsb.2022.12.013 · Cited by 56
Feng, S., Xie, X., Liu, J., Li, A., Wang, Q., Guo, D., Li, S., Li, Y., Wang, Z., Guo, T., et al. (2023) · Journal of Nanobiotechnology · doi:10.1186/s12951-023-02139-z · Cited by 59
Inhalation delivery technology for genome-editing of respiratory diseases
Chow, M. Y. T., Chang, R. Y. K., & Chan, H. (2020) · Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.addr.2020.06.001 · Cited by 54
Zhang, K., Chooi, W. H., Liu, S., Chin, J. S., Murray, A., Nižetić, D., Cheng, D., & Chew, S. Y. (2020) · Biomaterials · doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2020.120225 · Cited by 55
Tao, W., Cheng, X., Sun, D., Guo, Y., Wang, N., Ruan, J., Hu, Y., Zhao, M., Zhao, T. T., Feng, H., et al. (2022) · Biomaterials · doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2022.121621 · Cited by 53
Emerging Concepts of Nanobiotechnology in mRNA Delivery
Wang, Y., & Yu, C. (2020) · Angewandte Chemie International Edition · doi:10.1002/anie.202003545 · Cited by 54
Targeting cancer epigenetics with CRISPR-dCAS9: Principles and prospects
Rahman, M. M., & Tollefsbol, T. O. (2020) · Methods · doi:10.1016/j.ymeth.2020.04.006 · Cited by 51
Allemailem, K. S., Almatroodi, S. A., Almatroudi, A., Alrumaihi, F., Abdulmonem, W. A., Al‐Megrin, W. A. I., Aljamaan, A. N., Rahmani, A. H., & Khan, A. A. (2023) · International Journal of Molecular Sciences · doi:10.3390/ijms24087052 · Cited by 53
A review of chitosan in gene therapy: Developments and challenges
Dong, L., Li, Y., Cong, H., Yu, B., & Shen, Y. (2023) · Carbohydrate Polymers · doi:10.1016/j.carbpol.2023.121562 · Cited by 53
Metadata
- Authors
- Li, L., Hu, S., & Chen, X.
- Affiliations
- National Institutes of Health (US)
- Central South University (CN)
- Corresponding author
- Hu, Shuo
- Chen, Xiaoyuan
- Venue
- Biomaterials
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2018-07
- Volume
- 171
- Pages
- 207-218
- ISSN
- 0142-9612 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC5944364
- OpenAlex
- W2802060782
- Cited by
- 415
- References
- 206
- Citations by year
- 2026: 31 · 2025: 48 · 2024: 59 · 2023: 64 · 2022: 57 · 2021: 71 · 2020: 43 · 2019: 34 · 2018: 8
- FWCI
- 3.83
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Biomaterials (acceptedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- Funders
- National Natural Science Foundation of China (81771873)
- National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering
- National Institutes of Health
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA Interference and Gene Delivery
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › CRISPR and Genetic Engineering
- Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Biomaterials › Nanoparticle-Based Drug Delivery
- Keywords
- CRISPR/Cas9, genome editing, non-viral delivery, gene delivery vectors, lipid nanoparticles, polymeric nanoparticles, plasmid DNA delivery, mRNA delivery, protein delivery, in vivo delivery, CRISPR therapeutics
- MeSH terms
- Gene Editing, CRISPR-Associated Protein 9, Disease, Viruses, Gene Transfer Techniques, CRISPR-Cas Systems
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-10-10, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).
A second model labelled each claim on 2026-10-10 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).
Cited sources are checked with a language model’s help (gpt-6-sol).
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review