Cited by 185MicroRNA in disease regulationAlzheimer's disease research and treatmentsCholesterol and Lipid Metabolism

miR-106b impairs cholesterol efflux and increases Aβ levels by repressing ABCA1 expression

Open access
Kim, Jaekwang, Yoon, Hyejin, Ramírez, Cristina M., Lee, Sang-Mi, Hoe, Hyang-Sook, Fernández-Hernando, Carlos, Kim, Jungsu·2012·Experimental Neurology

Abstract

ATP-binding cassette transporter A1 (ABCA1) is a cholesterol transporter that transfers excess cellular cholesterol onto lipid-poor apolipoproteins. Given its critical role in cholesterol homeostasis, ABCA1 has been studied as a therapeutic target for Alzheimer's disease. Transcriptional regulation of ABCA1 by liver X receptor has been well characterized. However, whether ABCA1 expression is regulated at the posttranscriptional level is largely unknown. Identification of a novel pathway that regulates ABCA1 expression may provide new strategy for regulating cholesterol metabolism and amyloid β (Aβ) levels. Since ABCA1 has an unusually long 3' untranslated region, we investigated whether microRNAs could regulate ABCA1 expression. We identified miR-106b as a novel regulator of ABCA1 expression and Aβ metabolism. miR-106b significantly decreased ABCA1 levels and impaired cellular cholesterol efflux in neuronal cells. Furthermore, miR-106b dramatically increased levels of secreted Aβ by increasing Aβ production and preventing Aβ clearance. Alterations in Aβ production and clearance were rescued by expression of miR-106b-resistant ABCA1. Taken together, our data suggest that miR-106b affects Aβ metabolism by suppressing ABCA1 expression.

AI snapshot

Written from the paper’s full text.

TL;DR

miR-106b directly represses ABCA1 translation via the ABCA1 3′ UTR, reducing cholesterol efflux and increasing secreted Aβ in neuronal cells. The Aβ increase reflects both enhanced APP processing toward Aβ production and impaired Aβ clearance, and both are rescued by miR-106b-resistant ABCA1.

Key findings

  • miR-106b significantly decreased ABCA1 protein levels by approximately 45% in Neuro2a cells, 40% in HepG2 cells, and 60% in rat primary hippocampal neurons, without affecting ABCA1 mRNA levels; it also reduced luciferase activity from a full-length human ABCA1 3′ UTR reporter.
  • miR-106b impaired apoA-I-mediated cholesterol efflux under basal conditions and with LXR agonist T0901317, and reduced FBS-mediated efflux without T0901317 but not with T0901317.
  • miR-106b significantly increased secreted Aβ and CTFβ without changing cellular APP or BACE1 levels; miR-106b-resistant ABCA1 ORF rescued the increases in Aβ and CTFβ.
  • miR-106b significantly reduced Aβ clearance in the presence of FBS, and this was rescued by miR-106b-resistant ABCA1 ORF; without FBS, miR-106b did not affect Aβ clearance. Separately, miR-106b decreased endogenous APP by ~40% (control 100±4.285% vs miR-106b 59.92±7.252%, p=0.0031, n=4).

Methods

  • Cell models: mouse neuroblastoma Neuro2a cells, human hepatocyte HepG2 cells, and E18–E19 rat primary hippocampal neurons; transient transfections with synthetic miR-106b, scrambled control, miR-106b inhibitor, APPsw, and ABCA1 ORF constructs.
  • Assays: qRT-PCR for ABCA1 mRNA; dual-luciferase reporter containing the full-length human ABCA1 3′ UTR; immunocytochemistry and MetaMorph quantification in primary neurons; 3H-cholesterol efflux to apoA-I or FBS; Western blot for ABCA1, APP, BACE1, CTFβ, and Aβ; Aβ secretion and Aβ40 clearance assays.
  • Statistics: normality and equal variance tests followed by two-tailed Student’s t-test; data shown as mean ± SEM; significance thresholds *p<0.05, p<0.01, *p<0.001.

Limitations

  • The paper states that it cannot address whether the reduction of miR-106b observed in AD cases is detrimental or beneficial, and that in vivo significance will need further study using animal models.
  • The paper states that the mechanism underlying altered Aβ clearance by miR-106b remains unclear and that further studies are warranted.
  • Evident from the text: the main findings are from cultured cells, with no in vivo manipulation of miR-106b; Aβ production experiments used an APP construct lacking its 3′ UTR to avoid APP-targeting confounds, and Aβ clearance impairment was FBS-dependent.

Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.expneurol.2011.11.010

Cites

62 of 62 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Claims the paper makes

25 of 53 cited sources checked · 11 supported · 0 flagged · accuracy not yet measured

  • Premisecitation

    ABCA1 has a critical role in Aβ metabolism and accumulation.

    “Several lines of data strongly support that ABCA1 has a critical role in Aβ metabolism and accumulation.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Kim et al., 2007 source
    • cites Hirsch-Reinshagen et al., 2004 source
    • cites Donkin et al., 2010 source
  • Premisecitation

    Most studies demonstrated that ABCA1 induction decreases the levels of Aβ and CTFβ.

    “Most of studies demonstrated that ABCA1 induction decreases the levels of Aβ and CTFβ (Kim et al., 2007; Koldamova et al., 2003; Sun et al., 2003).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim2 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Kim et al., 2007 source

      In “Regulation of Aβ Peptide Generation by ABCG1” (page unavailable), the paper reports that ABCA1 expression reduced Aβ generation by 55% in CHO-APP cells. It does not report a decrease in CTFβ, so it supports only the Aβ portion of the claim. (LLM, conf=0.88)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites Koldamova et al., 2003 source

      In the Results section on APP processing (page unavailable), 22R and RA increased ABCA1 expression and reduced Aβ secretion and total APP C-terminal fragments in APPsw-expressing cells. The paper measures total CTF, not CTFβ specifically, and its Discussion says the effects on APP processing may involve factors beyond ABCA1-mediated cholesterol efflux. It therefore does not establish that ABCA1 induction itself decreases both Aβ and CTFβ. (LLM, conf=0.88)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites Sun et al., 2003 source
  • Premisecitation

    Overexpression of ABCA1 reduces Aβ deposition in AD mouse models.

    “Genetic studies with AD mouse models have demonstrated that the deletion of ABCA1 increases Aβ deposition, while overexpression of ABCA1 dramatically reduces Aβ deposition (Hirsch-Reinshagen et al., 2004; Koldamova et al., 2005; Wahrle et al., 2005; Wahrle et al., 2008; Wahrle et al., 2004).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Hirsch-Reinshagen et al., 2004 source
    • cites Koldamova et al., 2005 source
    • cites Wahrle et al., 2005 source

      The Discussion (page unavailable) predicts that increasing ABCA1 might decrease amyloid deposition, but explicitly says this hypothesis needs to be tested directly. The paper studies ABCA1 deletion, not overexpression, so it does not establish the claimed reduction or its magnitude. (LLM, conf=0.88)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Premisecitation

    ABCA1 overexpression ameliorated Aβ accumulation.

    “whereas ABCA1 overexpression ameliorated Aβ accumulation (Donkin et al., 2010; Wahrle et al., 2008).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Donkin et al., 2010 source
    • cites Wahrle et al., 2008 source
  • Premisecitation

    Deletion of ABCA1 increases Aβ deposition in AD mouse models.

    “Genetic studies with AD mouse models have demonstrated that the deletion of ABCA1 increases Aβ deposition, while overexpression of ABCA1 dramatically reduces Aβ deposition (Hirsch-Reinshagen et al., 2004; Koldamova et al., 2005; Wahrle et al., 2005; Wahrle et al., 2008; Wahrle et al., 2004).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Hirsch-Reinshagen et al., 2004 source
    • cites Koldamova et al., 2005 source
    • cites Wahrle et al., 2005 source
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 15
  • May combine two claims. 6
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation

    Most previous studies suggested that the main mechanism by which ABCA1 affects extracellular Aβ level is through regulation of Aβ production, not through Aβ clearance.

    “Most previous studies suggested that the main mechanism by which ABCA1 affects extracellular Aβ level is through regulation of Aβ production, not through Aβ clearance (Di Paolo and Kim, 2011; Hirsch-Reinshagen and Wellington, 2007).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Di Paolo and Kim, 2011 source

      In “Role of cholesterol metabolism and transport in amyloidogenesis” (page unavailable), the review says cholesterol efflux controls Aβ generation and that increased ABCA1 lowers Aβ levels in cultured cells. It also discusses ApoE lipidation and intracellular cholesterol as possible explanations for findings in mice. It does not say that most previous studies identified production, rather than clearance, as the main mechanism by which ABCA1 affects extracellular Aβ. (LLM, conf=0.83)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites Hirsch-Reinshagen and Wellington, 2007 source
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation

    A recent in vitro study demonstrated that the presence of fully lipidated apoE is required for effective degradation of Aβ in microglia.

    “A recent in vitro study demonstrated that the presence of fully lipidated apoE is required for effective degradation of Aβ in microglia (Jiang et al., 2008; Terwel et al., 2011).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Jiang et al., 2008 source
    • cites Terwel et al., 2011 source

      In the section on ApoE-dependent microglial phagocytosis (page not supplied), Terwel et al. report their in vitro finding that ApoE supports microglial uptake of fibrillar Aβ. The same section recounts Jiang et al.’s finding that degradation of soluble Aβ in cell cultures depends on ApoE and its lipidation status. It does not demonstrate that fully lipidated ApoE is required for microglial degradation of Aβ. (LLM, conf=0.85)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    ABCA1 expression was increased in the hippocampus of AD cases as well as an AD mouse model.

    “Recent studies reported that ABCA1 expression was increased in the hippocampus of AD cases as well as an AD mouse model (Akram et al., 2010; Kim et al., 2010).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Akram et al., 2010 source
    • cites Kim et al., 2010 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    The miR-106b cluster is known to regulate stem cell proliferation and neuronal differentiation.

    “In addition, the miR-106b cluster is known to regulate stem cell proliferation and neuronal differentiation (Brett et al., 2011; Li et al., 2011; Peck and Schulze, 2011).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim2 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Brett et al., 2011 source
    • cites Li et al., 2011

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites Peck and Schulze, 2011 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Uptake of Aβ through apolipoprotein receptors may be another Aβ clearance pathway.

    “In addition, uptake of Aβ through apolipoprotein receptors may be another Aβ clearance pathway (Bu, 2009; Fuentealba et al., 2010; Kanekiyo et al., 2011).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim2 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Bu, 2009

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites Fuentealba et al., 2010 source
    • cites Kanekiyo et al., 2011 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    miR-106b targets several genes implicated in cell cycles, such as p21, E2F, TAF5-like RNA polymerase II, and PTEN.

    “Previous studies have shown that miR-106b targets several genes implicated in cell cycles, such as cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor 1A (p21), E2F transcription factor, TAF5-like RNA polymerase II, and phosphatase and tensin homolog (Ivanovska et al., 2008; Pichiorri et al., 2008; Poliseno et al., 2010; Trompeter et al., 2011).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim3 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Ivanovska et al., 2008 source

      The Results identify p21/CDKN1A as a direct miR-106b target and report other likely cell-cycle-related targets. They do not identify TAF5-like RNA polymerase II or PTEN as targets; E2F appears in the references, but the Results say previously identified single targets were not regulated in this experimental system. Because the citations are not assigned to individual genes, this source supports only part of the cited list. (LLM, conf=0.87)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites Pichiorri et al., 2008 source

      The Discussion (page unavailable) reports that the miR-106b–25 cluster targets p21, supporting that part of the claim, though it does not establish the effect for miR-106b individually. It identifies E2F1 and PTEN as targets of the different miR-17–92 cluster, and the passages do not identify TAF5-like RNA polymerase II as a miR-106b target. (LLM, conf=0.88)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites Poliseno et al., 2010 source

      The Results section ('Two potentially oncogenic elements—miR-106b∼25 and MCM7—are present in the same locus'; page unavailable) states that all three members of the cluster, including miR-106b, target PTEN. The cited paper does not establish the sentence’s other listed targets—p21, E2F, or TAF5-like RNA polymerase II—so it supports only the PTEN portion of the claim. (LLM, conf=0.86)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Levels of ABCA1 highly correlated with severity of cognitive impairment.

    “levels of ABCA1 highly correlated with severity of cognitive impairment (Akram et al., 2010).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Akram et al., 2010 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingcitation

    FBS functions as a very efficient cholesterol acceptor.

    “As reported previously (Marquart et al., 2010), FBS functioned as a very efficient cholesterol acceptor.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Marquart et al., 2010 source
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    miR-106b decreases ABCA1 protein levels in Neuro2a mouse neuronal cells and HepG2 human hepatocytes, by approximately 45% and 40%, respectively.

    “miR-106b significantly decreased ABCA1 protein levels in both mouse and human cell types (Fig. 1B).”
    • Also stated in: § Identification of miR-106b as a regulator of ABCA1 expression · plain
      “Approximately 45% and 40 % reductions in ABCA1 protein levels were observed in Neuro2a and HepG2 cells, respectively (Fig. 1C).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    miR-106b did not noticeably change the levels of cellular APP and BACE1 proteins.

    “While there were no noticeable changes in the levels of cellular APP and BACE1 proteins”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation

    ABCA1 is a cholesterol transporter that transfers excess cellular cholesterol onto lipid-poor apolipoproteins.

    “ATP-binding cassette transporter A1 (ABCA1) is a cholesterol transporter that transfers excess cellular cholesterol onto lipid-poor apolipoproteins.”
    • Also stated in: § Introduction · plain
      “ATP-binding cassette transporter A1 (ABCA1), a member of the ABC transmembrane transporter family, plays an important role in cholesterol transport by transferring cholesterol and phospholipid onto lipid-poor apolipoprotein A1 (apoA-I) and apolipoprotein E (apoE) to form high-density lipoprotein (HDL) particles (Hirsch-Reinshagen et al., 2009).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Hirsch-Reinshagen et al., 2009 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    ABCA1 is required for the beneficial effect of LXR agonist in AD mouse model.

    “Recently, Donkin et al. also indicated that ABCA1 is required for the beneficial effect of LXR agonist in AD mouse model (Donkin et al., 2010).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Donkin et al., 2010 source
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    miR-106b directly regulates ABCA1 expression by binding to the 3' UTR of ABCA1 and repressing its translation.

    “Collectively, our data suggest that miR-106b directly regulates ABCA1 expression by binding to the 3′ UTR of ABCA1 and repressing its translation.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Study design and conductown data

    The data did not violate the assumptions of parametric testing (equal variance and normality).

    “After confirmation that the data did not violate the assumptions of parametric testing, a two-tailed Student’s t-test was used (GraphPad Prism 5, La Jolla, CA).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation

    miRNAs repress translation or degrade target mRNAs by binding to target mRNAs.

    “By binding to their target messenger RNAs (mRNAs), miRNAs repress translation or degrade target mRNAs (Huntzinger and Izaurralde, 2011).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Huntzinger and Izaurralde, 2011

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    Reduction of ABCA1 level below a certain endogenous level leads to an impairment of Aβ clearance, whereas an increase of ABCA1 level above endogenous level does not affect Aβ clearance in neuronal cells.

    “It appears that reduction of ABCA1 level below a certain endogenous level leads to an impairment of Aβ clearance, whereas an increase of ABCA1 level above endogenous level does not affect Aβ clearance in neuronal cells.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Induction of ABCA1 in AD brains was mainly due to increased neuronal expression.

    “Induction of ABCA1 in AD brains was mainly due to increased neuronal expression (Kim et al., 2010)”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Kim et al., 2010 source
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation

    In previous study, miR-106b significantly decreased APP levels in HeLa cervical cancer cell line.

    “In previous study, miR-106b significantly decreased APP levels in HeLa cervical cancer cell line (Hebert et al., 2009).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Hebert et al., 2009 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationreasoning

    The study cannot address whether the reduction of miR-106b observed in AD cases is detrimental or beneficial for AD pathogenesis.

    “our study cannot address whether the reduction of miR-106b observed in AD cases is detrimental or beneficial for AD pathogenesis.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
19 of 19
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Posttranscriptional regulation of ABCA1 is largely unknown.

    “However, whether ABCA1 expression is regulated at the posttranscriptional level is largely unknown.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The exact mechanisms underlying the regulation of Aβ metabolism by ABCA1 have not been clearly described.

    “However, the exact mechanisms underlying the regulation of Aβ metabolism by ABCA1 have not been clearly described.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    ABCA1 gene has an unusually long 3' UTR (>3.3 kilobases).

    “ABCA1 (ABCA1) gene has an unusually long 3′ UTR (> 3.3 kilobases), raising a possibility that it might be regulated by post-transcriptional regulations, such as miRNA-mediated gene repression.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Aβ peptides are generated by sequential cleavages of APP by BACE1 and γ-secretases.

    “Aβ peptides are generated by sequential cleavages of amyloid precursor protein (APP) by β-site APP-cleaving enzyme1 (BACE1) and γ-secretases.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Expression of miR-106b-resistant ABCA1 ORF does not affect other miR-106b target genes that could influence Aβ levels.

    “These results suggest that the increase of Aβ by miR-106b is likely due to a repression of ABCA1, rather than other targets.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The APP construct without 3′ UTR is not regulated by miR-106b or other miRNAs.

    “we used an APP construct without potential miRNA target sites (3′ UTR). Therefore, we were able to exclude a potentially confounding contribution by miRNA-mediated APP downregulation.”
6 of 6

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • ABCA1 decreases Aβ levels by promoting extracellular Aβ clearance in both neurons and glial cells.

    “In addition to its role in A␤ secretion, ABCA1 has been also shown to decrease A␤ levels by promoting extracellular A␤ clearance in both neurons and glial cells (Jiang et al., 2008;Kim et al., 2012).”

    From microRNA-33 Regulates ApoE Lipidation and Amyloid-β Metabolism in the Brain (2015) · cites this paper as Kim et al., 2012

    The Results section ('Impairment of Aβ clearance by miR-106b is rescued by ABCA1 ORF expression'; page unavailable) reports that restoring ABCA1 rescued impaired extracellular Aβ clearance in neuronal cells. The Discussion says ABCA1 overexpression did not increase clearance above baseline in those cells and only suggests a possible clearance mechanism in microglia. The claim therefore overstates the evidence for promoted clearance in both neurons and glial cells. (LLM, conf=0.89)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • ABCA1 is required for the effective clearance of Aβ by neuronal and glial cells.

    “we and others have shown that ABCA1 is required for the effective clearance of A␤ by neuronal and glial cells”

    From microRNA-33 Regulates ApoE Lipidation and Amyloid-β Metabolism in the Brain (2015) · cites this paper as Kim et al., 2012

    The Results section ('Impairment of Aβ clearance by miR-106b is rescued by ABCA1 ORF expression'; page not provided) shows that restoring ABCA1 rescued impaired Aβ clearance in neuronal cells, but only when the medium contained FBS. The Discussion (page not provided) describes ABCA1's possible role in microglial clearance as a suggestion, not an established requirement. The claim therefore extends the neuronal-cell finding to glial cells and omits the experimental condition. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • ApoE lipidation by ABCA1 is critical for Aβ clearance.

    “ApoE lipidation by ABCA1 is critical for A␤ clearance (Jiang et al., 2008;Kim et al., 2012).”

    From microRNA-33 Regulates ApoE Lipidation and Amyloid-β Metabolism in the Brain (2015) · cites this paper as Kim et al., 2012

    The Discussion reports that fully lipidated apoE is required for effective Aβ degradation in microglia and that reducing ABCA1 impaired extracellular Aβ clearance. But it says ABCA1 *may* affect clearance by facilitating apoE lipidation and that the mechanism remains unclear; it does not establish that this route is critical. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Increase of Aβ levels by miR-106b-5p is completely rescued by a miR-106b-5p-resistant ABCA1 construct lacking the 3' UTR.

    “Increase of Aβ levels by miR-106b-5p was completely rescued by the miR-106b-5p-resistant ABCA1 construct that lacks the 3’ UTR.”

    From MicroRNAs in brain cholesterol metabolism and their implications for Alzheimer's disease (2016) · cites this paper as [116]

    The Results section, “Alteration in APP processing by miR-106b is rescued by ABCA1 ORF expression” (page unavailable), reports that a miR-106b-resistant ABCA1 construct lacking the 3′ UTR rescued the increase in Aβ. It does not state that the rescue was complete, so that degree of rescue is unsupported. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • ABCA1 is redundantly targeted by miR-106b, miR-758, and miR-33 in the brain.

    “ABCA1 is redundantly targeted by miR-106b, miR-758, and miR-33 in the brain.”

    From MicroRNAs in brain cholesterol metabolism and their implications for Alzheimer's disease (2016) · cites this paper as [116]

    The Results section reports that miR-106b suppresses ABCA1 in rat primary hippocampal neurons and supports direct regulation through ABCA1’s 3′ UTR (page not available in our copy). The passages found do not establish that miR-758 or miR-33 also target ABCA1 in the brain, or that the three act redundantly. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.

  • Cholesterol-efflux methods name a different miRNA

    Minor

    The cholesterol-efflux methods say cells were transfected with miR-106, while the corresponding results attribute the effect to miR-106b. The text does not clarify whether "miR-106" is shorthand or a different reagent.

  • Aβ-clearance results use inconsistent miRNA names

    Minor

    The clearance methods identify miR-106b as the transfected reagent, but the results describe the same clearance experiment as using miR-106.

2 of 2

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 63 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kim, J., Yoon, H., Ramírez, C. M., Lee, S.-M., Hoe, H.-S., Fernández-Hernando, C., & Kim, J.
Affiliations
  • Washington University in St. Louis (US)
  • Georgetown University Medical Center (US)
Venue
Experimental Neurology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2012-06
Volume
235
Issue
2
Pages
476-483
ISSN
0014-4886 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2065691532
Cited by
173
References
63
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 24 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 21 · 2013: 22 · 2012: 13
FWCI
5.48
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Experimental Neurology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (submittedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (submittedVersion)
Funders
NIH
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cancer Research › MicroRNA in disease regulation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Cholesterol and Lipid Metabolism
Keywords
miR-106b, ABCA1, cholesterol efflux, amyloid-beta, Alzheimer's disease, microRNA regulation, post-transcriptional regulation, 3' untranslated region, cholesterol homeostasis, amyloid-beta clearance, neurons
MeSH terms
Animals, Biological Transport, Active, Cells, Cultured, Cholesterol, Humans, Signal Transduction, Down-Regulation, Up-Regulation, Amyloid beta-Peptides, Rats, Sprague-Dawley, ATP-Binding Cassette Transporters, MicroRNAs, Mice, Rats, Hep G2 Cells, ATP Binding Cassette Transporter 1

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-17.

Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-17.

Cited sources are checked by gpt-6-sol.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review