Cited by 561

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 20 of the 20 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Metabolic adaptations through the PGC‐1α and SIRT1 pathways

Rodgers, Joseph T., Lerin, Carles, Gerhart-Hines, Zachary, Puigserver, Pere·2008·FEBS Letters

Abstract

Energy homeostasis in mammals is achieved through tight regulation of tissue‐specific metabolic pathways that become dysregulated in metabolic diseases including diabetes and obesity. At the molecular level, main nutrient and hormonal signaling pathways impinge on expression of genes encoding for metabolic enzymes. Among the major components of this transcriptional circuitry are the PGC‐1α transcriptional complexes. An important regulatory mechanism of this complex is through acetylation and SIRT1‐mediated lysine de‐acetylation under low nutrient conditions. Activation of SIRT1 can mimic several metabolic aspects of calorie restriction that target selective nutrient utilization and mitochondrial oxidative function to regulate energy balance. Thus, understanding the PGC‐1α and SIRT1 pathways might have important implications for comprehending metabolic and age‐associated diseases.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.febslet.2007.11.034

Cites

20 of 20 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In liver cells, AMPK suppresses autophagy at the level of cargo sequestration.

    “In liver cells, AMPK suppresses autophagy at the level of cargo sequestration, as indicated by the rapid sequestration-inhibitory effects of a variety of AMPK activators”
  • AMPK appears to stimulate autophagy in many other cell types, including fibroblasts, colon carcinoma cells and skeletal muscle.

    “whereas it appears to stimulate autophagy in many other cell types, including fibroblasts, colon carcinoma cells and skeletal muscle [656-665]”
  • Under glucose starvation, AMPK apparently promotes autophagy by directly activating ULK1 through phosphorylation, although the exact AMPK-mediated ULK1 phosphorylation site(s) remains controversial.

    “Under glucose starvation, AMPK apparently promotes autophagy by directly activating ULK1 through phosphorylation, although the exact AMPK-mediated ULK1 phosphorylation site(s) remains controversial (Table 2) [665, 669-671].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 33

  1. 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)81410-5 · DOI · Paper page
  2. 10.1016/S1097-2765(03)00391-5 · DOI
  3. 10.1016/j.cmet.2006.04.013 · DOI · Paper page
  4. 10.1038/sj.emboj.7601633 · DOI · Paper page
  5. 10.1101/gad.1295005 · DOI
  6. 10.1101/gad.1483906 · DOI
  7. 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)81671-2 · DOI
  8. 10.1038/35065638 · DOI · Paper page
  9. 10.1073/pnas.0404184101 · DOI · Paper page
  10. 10.1073/pnas.0409875102 · DOI
  11. 10.1038/nature02583 · DOI
  12. 10.1016/S0092-8674(01)00527-X · DOI
  13. 10.1371/journal.pbio.0030041 · DOI
  14. 10.1073/pnas.0702509104 · DOI · Paper page
  15. 10.1073/pnas.0604392103 · DOI · Paper page
  16. 10.1126/science.1077650 · DOI · Paper page
  17. 10.1016/j.cell.2004.09.013 · DOI · Paper page
  18. 10.1038/nature06128 · DOI
  19. 10.1016/j.cmet.2007.08.006 · DOI
  20. 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)80595-4 · DOI · Paper page
  21. 10.1016/j.cmet.2006.08.005 · DOI
  22. 10.1042/bj1190525 · DOI
  23. 10.1074/jbc.M600050200 · DOI
  24. 10.1016/j.cmet.2007.08.014 · DOI · Paper page
  25. 10.1016/S1097-2765(03)00226-0 · DOI
  26. 10.1111/j.1474-9726.2007.00335.x · DOI · Paper page
  27. 10.1161/01.RES.0000267723.65696.4a · DOI · Paper page
  28. 10.1016/j.cell.2006.09.024 · DOI · Paper page
  29. 10.1016/j.cmet.2006.04.002 · DOI
  30. 10.1016/j.cmet.2007.06.001 · DOI · Paper page
  31. 10.2337/db06-1465 · DOI · Paper page
  32. 10.1073/pnas.0610615104 · DOI · Paper page
  33. 10.1152/ajpendo.00691.2006 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Rodgers, J. T., Lerin, C., Gerhart-Hines, Z., & Puigserver, P.
Venue
FEBS Letters
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2007-11-26
Volume
582
Issue
1
Pages
46-53
ISSN
  • 0014-5793
  • 1873-3468
Cited by
561
References
20
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review