Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 3,221

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 16 of the 16 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Consumer engagement in a virtual brand community: An exploratory analysis

Brodie, Roderick J., Ilic, Ana, Juric, Biljana, Hollebeek, Linda·2013·Journal of Business Research
DOI 10.1016/j.jbusres.2011.07.029
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jbusres.2011.07.029

Cites

16 of 16 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 16 references

Research works printed but not linked: 44

  1. Algesheimer, 2005, The social influence of brand community: evidence from European car clubs, Journal of Marketing, 69, 19, 10.1509/jmkg.69.3.19.66363 · DOI · Paper page
  2. Andersen, 2005, Relationship marketing and brand involvement of professionals through web-enhanced brand communities: the case of Coloplast, Industrial Marketing Management, 34, 39, 10.1016/j.indmarman.2004.07.002 · DOI · Paper page
  3. Appelbaum, 2001, The constant consumer, Gallup Management Journal
  4. Ashley, 2011, Why customers won't relate: obstacles to relationship marketing engagement, Journal of Business Research, 64, 749, 10.1016/j.jbusres.2010.07.006 · DOI · Paper page
  5. Bijmolt, 2010, Analytics for customer engagement, Journal of Service Research, 13, 341, 10.1177/1094670510375603 · DOI · Paper page
  6. Bowden, 2009, Customer engagement: a framework for assessing customer–brand relationships: the case of the restaurant industry, Journal of Hospitality Marketing and Management, 18, 574, 10.1080/19368620903024983 · DOI
  7. Brodie, 2011, Customer engagement: conceptual domain, fundamental propositions and implications for research, Journal of Service Research, 14, 1, 10.1177/1094670511411703 · DOI · Paper page
  8. Casalo, 2007, The impact of participation in virtual brand communities on consumer trust and loyalty: the case of free software, Online Information Review, 34, 775, 10.1108/14684520710841766 · DOI · Paper page
  9. Chan, 2010, Understanding consumer-to-consumer interactions in virtual communities: the salience of reciprocity, Journal of Business Research, 63, 1033, 10.1016/j.jbusres.2008.08.009 · DOI · Paper page
  10. Cova, 2006, Brand community of convenience products: new forms of customer empowerment — the case “My Nutella” community, European Journal of Marketing, 40, 1087, 10.1108/03090560610681023 · DOI · Paper page
  11. Cova, 2008, Marketing solutions in accordance with the S–D logic: co-creating value with customer network actors, Industrial Marketing Management, 37, 270, 10.1016/j.indmarman.2007.07.005 · DOI · Paper page
  12. de Chernatony, 2004, Taking the brand promise online: challenges and opportunities, Interactive Marketing, 5, 238, 10.1057/palgrave.im.4340241 · doi:10.1057/palgrave.im.4340241
  13. De Valck, 2009, Virtual communities: a marketing perspective, Decision Support Systems, 47, 185, 10.1016/j.dss.2009.02.008 · DOI · Paper page
  14. Füller, 2009, Consumer empowerment through Internet-based co-creation, Journal of Management Information Systems, 26, 71, 10.2753/MIS0742-1222260303 · DOI · Paper page
  15. Gruen, 2006, EWOM: the impact of customer-to-customer online know-how exchange on customer value and loyalty, Journal of Business Research, 59, 449, 10.1016/j.jbusres.2005.10.004 · DOI · Paper page
  16. Hoffman, 1996, Marketing in hypermedia computer-mediated environments: conceptual foundations, Journal of Marketing, 60, 50, 10.2307/1251841 · doi:10.2307/1251841 · Paper page
  17. Hollebeek, 2011, Demystifying customer brand engagement: exploring the loyalty nexus, Journal of Marketing Management, 27, 785, 10.1080/0267257X.2010.500132 · DOI · Paper page
  18. Keller, 1993, Conceptualizing, measuring, and managing customer-based brand equity, Journal of Marketing, 57, 1, 10.2307/1252054 · doi:10.2307/1252054 · Paper page
  19. Kothandaraman, 2001, The future of competition value-creating networks, Industrial Marketing Management, 30, 379, 10.1016/S0019-8501(00)00152-8 · DOI · Paper page
  20. Kozinets, 1997, I want to believe: a netnography of the X-Files subculture of consumption, Advances in Consumer Research
  21. Kozinets, 1999, E-tribalized marketing? The strategic implications of virtual communities of consumption, European Management Journal, 17, 252, 10.1016/S0263-2373(99)00004-3 · DOI · Paper page
  22. Kozinets, 2002, The field behind the screen: using netnography for marketing research in online communities, Journal of Marketing Research, 39, 61, 10.1509/jmkr.39.1.61.18935 · DOI · Paper page
  23. Longmore, 1998, Symbolic interactionism and the study of sexuality, Journal of Sex Research, 35, 44, 10.1080/00224499809551916 · DOI
  24. Lusch, 2006, The service-dominant logic of marketing: reactions, reflections, and refinements, Marketing Theory, 6, 281, 10.1177/1470593106066781 · DOI · Paper page
  25. Mathwick, 2008, Social capital production in a virtual P3 community, Journal of Consumer Research, 34, 832, 10.1086/523291 · DOI · Paper page
  26. Mertz, 2009, The evolving brand logic: a service-dominant perspective, Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 37, 328, 10.1007/s11747-009-0143-3 · DOI · Paper page
  27. Mollen, 2010, Engagement, telepresence and interactivity in online consumer experience: reconciling scholastic and managerial perspectives, Journal of Business Research, 63, 919, 10.1016/j.jbusres.2009.05.014 · DOI · Paper page
  28. Muñiz, 2005, Religiosity in the abandoned Apple Newton brand community, Journal of Consumer Research, 31, 737, 10.1086/426607 · DOI · Paper page
  29. Muñiz, 2006, A tale of tales: the Apple Newton narratives, Journal of Strategic Marketing, 14, 19
  30. Neff, 2007, OMD proves the power of engagement, Advertising age, 78
  31. Nolan, 2007, Individual trust and development of online business communities, Information Technology & People, 20, 53, 10.1108/09593840710730554 · DOI
  32. Payne, 2009, Co-creation: diagnosing the brand relationship experience, Journal of Business Research, 62, 379, 10.1016/j.jbusres.2008.05.013 · DOI · Paper page
  33. Pham, 2009, Rethinking regulatory engagement theory, Journal of Consumer Psychology, 19, 115, 10.1016/j.jcps.2009.02.003 · DOI · Paper page
  34. Porter, 2008, Cultivating trust and harvesting value in virtual communities, Management Science, 54, 113, 10.1287/mnsc.1070.0765 · DOI · Paper page
  35. Prahalad, 2004, Co-creation experiences: the next practice in value creation, Journal of Interactive Marketing, 18, 5, 10.1002/dir.20015 · DOI · Paper page
  36. Ramaswamy, 2009, Leading the transformation to co-creation of value, Strategy & Leadership, 37, 32, 10.1108/10878570910941208 · DOI · Paper page
  37. Resnick, 2001, Defining engagement, Journal of International Affairs, 54, 551
  38. Richins, 1991, Post-purchase satisfaction: incorporating the effects of involvement and time, Journal of Business Research, 23, 145, 10.1016/0148-2963(91)90025-S · DOI
  39. Schouten, 2007, Transcendent customer experience and brand community, Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 35, 357, 10.1007/s11747-007-0034-4 · DOI · Paper page
  40. Thomsen, 1998, Ethnomethodology and the study of online communities: exploring the cyber streets, Information Research, 4
  41. Vargo, 2009, Toward a transcending conceptualization of relationship: a service-dominant logic perspective, The Journal of Business and Industrial Marketing, 24, 373, 10.1108/08858620910966255 · DOI · Paper page
  42. Ward, 1999, The cyber-ethnographic (re)construction of two feminist online communities, Sociological Research Online, 4, 10.5153/sro.222 · DOI
  43. Wiertz, 2007, Beyond the call of duty: why consumers contribute to firm-hosted commercial online communities, Organization Studies, 28, 347, 10.1177/0170840607076003 · DOI · Paper page
  44. Zimmerman, 1998, Empowerment theory for rehabilitation research: conceptual and methodological issues, Rehabilitation Psychology, 43, 3, 10.1037/0090-5550.43.1.3 · doi:10.1037/0090-5550.43.1.3 · Paper page

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Brodie, R. J., Ilic, A., Juric, B., & Hollebeek, L.
Venue
Journal of Business Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2013-01
Volume
66
Issue
1
Pages
105-114
ISSN
0148-2963 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/j.jbusres.2011.07.029
OpenAlex
W2086157089
Cited by
3,221
References
16
FWCI
139.31
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.