Cited by 523Functional Brain Connectivity StudiesNeural dynamics and brain functionMind wandering and attention

Unrest at rest: Default activity and spontaneous network correlations

Buckner, Randy L., Vincent, Justin L.·2007·NeuroImage

Abstract

A series of recent empirical observations demonstrate structured activity patterns that exist during passive task states. One observation is that a network of regions, referred to as the default network, shows preferentially greater activity during passive task states as compared to a wide range of active tasks. The second observation is that distributed regions spontaneously increase and decrease their activity together within functional-anatomic networks, even under anesthesia. We believe these rest activity patterns may reflect neural functions that consolidate the past, stabilize brain ensembles, and prepare us for the future. Accumulating data further suggest that differences in rest activity may be relevant to understanding clinical conditions such as Alzheimer's disease and autism. Maps of spontaneous network correlations also provide tools for functional localization and study of comparative anatomy between primate species. For all of these reasons, we advocate the systematic exploration of rest activity.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.01.010

Cites

14 of 14 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The default network is important for constructing representations of emotion experience and perception in the moment.

    “the “default network” that is active when a person is not probed by an external stimulus in fMRI experiments (Buckner & Vincent 2007; Raichle et al. 2001) is not only important to constructing representations of the past and the future, but also for constructing representations of emotion experience and perception in the moment.”

    From The brain basis of emotion: a meta-analytic review (2012) · cites this paper as Buckner & Vincent 2007

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Buckner, R. L., & Vincent, J. L.
Affiliations
  • Howard Hughes Medical Institute (US)
  • Harvard University (US)
Corresponding author
Buckner, Randy L.
Venue
NeuroImage
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2007-10
Volume
37
Issue
4
Pages
1091-1096
ISSN
1053-8119 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1984804736
Cited by
523
References
14
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 21 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 24 · 2020: 20 · 2019: 22 · 2018: 29 · 2017: 26 · 2016: 44 · 2015: 31 · 2014: 32 · 2013: 43 · 2012: 34
FWCI
2.80
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • NeuroImage (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Howard Hughes Medical Institute
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural dynamics and brain function
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Mind wandering and attention
Keywords
default mode network, spontaneous neuronal activity, resting state, network correlation, anesthesia, memory consolidation, Alzheimer's disease, autism spectrum disorder, functional localization
MeSH terms
Alzheimer Disease, Animals, Brain, Brain Mapping, Electroencephalography, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Mental Processes, Nerve Net, Primates, Rest, Species Specificity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review