The DOI matches its Crossref record; 54 of the 55 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; none of the 91 sources its claims cite is checked for support yet.
The visual word form area: expertise for reading in the fusiform gyrus
Abstract
Brain imaging studies reliably localize a region of visual cortex that is especially responsive to visual words. This brain specialization is essential to rapid reading ability because it enhances perception of words by becoming specifically tuned to recurring properties of a writing system. The origin of this specialization poses a challenge for evolutionary accounts involving innate mechanisms for functional brain organization. We propose an alternative account, based on studies of other forms of visual expertise (i.e. bird and car experts) that lead to functional reorganization. We argue that the interplay between the unique demands of word reading and the structural constraints of the visual system lead to the emergence of the Visual Word Form Area.
Overview
AI snapshot
Written from the paper’s full text.
TL;DR
The paper reviews evidence that a left fusiform region, the Visual Word Form Area (VWFA), is reliably activated by visual words and shows abstract, prelexical tuning to orthographic structure. It proposes that this specialization arises through reading-driven perceptual expertise rather than an innate word-recognition module.
Key findings
- The VWFA localizes to the left occipitotemporal sulcus bordering the fusiform gyrus, with a group peak at approximately x = −43, y = −54, z = −12 mm; this peak is found in over 90% of individual subject scans, with a standard deviation of <5 mm.
- The region responds to visual words and pseudowords more than control stimuli, shows case/font/size and left–right visual-field invariance, is activated even without awareness, and is sensitive to orthographic regularity but generally not to lexical frequency or real-versus-pseudoword contrasts.
- The authors argue the VWFA is a case of perceptual expertise: writing is only ~5400 years old, too recent for dedicated evolutionary selection, and VWFA activity correlates with grapheme–phoneme decoding ability even when age is controlled.
- Neuropsychological evidence links pure alexia and left-visual-field word-reading deficits to damage or disconnection around the VWFA; adults with developmental dyslexia show reduced VWFA activation to words and pseudowords.
Methods
- Review and synthesis of prior neuroimaging studies (fMRI, PET, ERP, MEG, intracranial recordings), neuropsychological lesion evidence, developmental studies, and visual-expertise research; no new empirical data are presented.
- Localization claims draw on reviews of over 25 group experiments; developmental evidence includes children aged 7–18 years and behavioral/ERP studies in first-graders and older children.
- Main analysis is qualitative convergence across experimental contrasts and populations, leading to a proposed functional-anatomical model of visual word reading.
Limitations
- The paper does not include a formal limitations section. It states caveats: the term VWFA need not imply sole dedication to word recognition, object and face recognition can also activate this region, other regions can be modulated by visual word forms, and projections from the VWFA to lexical, semantic, and phonological systems are less clearly defined.
- Evident from the text: this is a review rather than a new experiment, some cited findings are “in press,” and the functional-anatomical model is described as tentative.
Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
54 Not checked yet · 24 Own interpretation
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The origin of this specialization poses a challenge for evolutionary accounts involving innate mechanisms for functional brain organization.”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: unclear — It is unclear whether it could be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: unclear — It is unclear why the paper says it holds.
- Rests on an assumption: Writing was invented about 5400 years ago.
- Rests on an assumption: 5400 years is insufficient time for selective pressures to engineer a specialized module for visual word recognition.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“We argue that the interplay between the unique demands of word reading and the structural constraints of the visual system lead to the emergence of the Visual Word Form Area.”
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Several lines of cognitive evidence indicate that the perceptual mechanisms that support word recognition rest on a critical process that groups the letters of a word together into an integrated perceptual unit (i.e. a 'visual word form').”
What the sources say
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Brain imaging studies reliably localize a region of visual cortex that is especially responsive to visual words.”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [8] Cohen, 2002, Language-specific tuning of visual cortex? Functional properties of the visual word form area, Brain source
- Not checked yetcites [9] Cohen, 2000, The visual word form area: spatial and temporal characterization of an initial stage of reading in normal subjects and posterior split-brain patients, Brain source
- Not checked yetcites [10] Polk, 2002, Functional MRI evidence for an abstract, not perceptual, word-form area, J. Exp. Psychol. Gen. source
- Not checked yetcites [11] Dehaene, 2002, The visual word form area: a prelexical representation of visual words in the fusiform gyrus, Neuroreport source
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Within less than 250 ms of viewing a written word, the visual system extracts the information needed to identify its linguistic significance, despite wide variations in print, script, font, size and retinal position.”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [1] Rayner, 1989
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Literate adults possess a special form of visual expertise that allows their visual system to process words efficiently.”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [1] Rayner, 1989
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“This brain specialization is essential to rapid reading ability because it enhances perception of words by becoming specifically tuned to recurring properties of a writing system.”
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: unclear — It is unclear why the paper says it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“The response properties of the VWFA demonstrate a form of tuning to learned letter stimuli, which produce greater activity than well-controlled pseudoletters, that can be measured by blocks of PET data [19], as well by the first 200 ms of activity in MEG and intracranial electrical recordings [16].”
What the sources say
boostedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Nevertheless, we argue that this region of the visual system must contain a population of neurons that, as an ensemble, is tuned to invariant stimulus properties and structural regularities characteristic of written words.”
boostedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Consistent with the rapid time course of visual word recognition, event-related potentials (ERPs) recorded over left posterior visual regions within 150-200 ms demonstrate sensitivity to words relative to other stimuli that control for visual features [12,13].”
What the sources say
boostedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- It may state two separate claims as one. 16
- Probably not a substantial claim. 6
In the paper
“Chronometric studies show that the speed of word recognition is remarkably uninfluenced by the number of letters present in a 3-6-letter word, indicating a form of parallel processing of the letters [2].”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [2] Nazir, 1998, Letter legibility and visual word recognition, Mem. Cogn. source
hedged- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Finally, converging neuropsychological evidence indicates that selective damage to the left fusiform region impairs visual but not auditory word recognition (Box 1).”
What the sources say
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“This finding is robust enough to identify a significant peak of activation in over 90% of individual subject scans, with a standard deviation of , 5 mm [8-11] (Fig. 1).”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [8] Cohen, 2002, Language-specific tuning of visual cortex? Functional properties of the visual word form area, Brain source
- Not checked yetcites [9] Cohen, 2000, The visual word form area: spatial and temporal characterization of an initial stage of reading in normal subjects and posterior split-brain patients, Brain source
- Not checked yetcites [10] Polk, 2002, Functional MRI evidence for an abstract, not perceptual, word-form area, J. Exp. Psychol. Gen. source
- Not checked yetcites [11] Dehaene, 2002, The visual word form area: a prelexical representation of visual words in the fusiform gyrus, Neuroreport source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“This process is highly sensitive to the abstract structural properties of the writing system, but largely insensitive to non-essential variations in visual features such as case and font [1].”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [1] Rayner, 1989
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Finally, these perceptual operations adapt well to large variations in surface features of word stimuli, such as changes in size, case, and font, and demonstrate significant transfer of priming benefits across such variations [1].”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [1] Rayner, 1989
boostedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“IT neurons have vast receptive fields and respond selectively to certain objects or parts of objects across large changes in size, position and illumination [39,40].”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [39] Tanaka, 2003, Columns for complex visual object features in inferotemporal cortex: clustering of cells with similar but slightly different stimulus selectivities, Cereb. Cortex source
- Not checked yetcites [40] Einhauser, 2002, Learning the invariance properties of complex cells from their responses to natural stimuli, Eur. J. Neurosci. source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“For example, inferotemporal (IT) cortex is well known for its role in invariant object recognition.”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [39] Tanaka, 2003, Columns for complex visual object features in inferotemporal cortex: clustering of cells with similar but slightly different stimulus selectivities, Cereb. Cortex source
- Not checked yetcites [40] Einhauser, 2002, Learning the invariance properties of complex cells from their responses to natural stimuli, Eur. J. Neurosci. source
boostedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The hypothesis of a progressive specialization of the left VWFA over the course of reading acquisition avoids problems inherent to the notion of a ready-made 'word recognition module'.”
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
- Rests on an assumption: Writing was invented about 5400 years ago.
- Rests on an assumption: 5400 years is insufficient time for selective pressures to engineer a specialized module for visual word recognition.
In the paper
“Although enhanced abilities to perceive well-structured letter strings appear early in the reading process, such effects are restricted to high-frequency words and do not generalize to novel strings until 10-13 years of age [4] (although see [35]).”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [4] Gibson, 1962, The role of grapheme–phoneme correspondence in the perception of words, Am. J. Psychol. source
hedged- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Sensitivity to increasingly larger visual units varies along a posterior-toanterior gradient, whereas sensitivity to increasingly eccentric sectors of the retina varies along a lateral-tomesialgradient.”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [43] Malach, 2002, The topography of high-order human object areas, Trends Cogn. Sci. source
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Much of the ventral processing stream is already well adapted to the invariant recognition of fine basic shapes in the fovea.”
boosted- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Unlike adults, 6- to 7-year-old children (American first-graders) demonstrate robust word-length effects, which gradually diminish over the following years but are still detectable as late as grade 5 (11-12 years old) [34].”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [34] Aghababian, 2000, Developing normal reading skills: aspects of the visual processes underlying word recognition, J. Exp. Child Psychol. source
boostedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“In contrast to global alexia, PA patients are able to identify single letters, and develop letter-by-letter reading strategies resulting in reading latencies that increase by hundreds of milliseconds for each additional letter [49].”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [49] Cohen, L. et al. (2003) Visual word recognition in the left and right hemispheres: anatomical and functional correlates of peripheral alexias. Cereb. Cortex (in press). source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Developmental studies of the N200 ERP responses to letter strings demonstrate a similar pattern, suggesting that 10-year-olds produce adult-like responses to highfrequency words but fail to generalize such responses to pseudowords [21].”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [21] Posner, 1999, Brain circuitry during reading
hedgedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Such differences have not yet been associated with neuropathology in this region, but mayinstead reflect the absence of a specialization that accrues over the course of years of successful reading experience [55].”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [55] McCandliss, B.D. and Noble, K. (2003) The development of reading impairment: a cognitive neuroscience model. Mental Retard. Dev. Disab. Res. Rev. (in press). source
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“This view on the origin of the VWFA implies that the specialization process should be protracted over a long period of experience and that the response properties of the VWFA should evolve in parallel with the rise of cognitive hallmarks of expertise.”
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Although the precise projections from VWFA to systems involved in lexical, semantic and phonological processes are currently less clearly defined, functional areas probably include the left angular gyrus [52], left inferior frontal cortex [53], and temporal regions anterior to the VWFA [54].”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [52] Horwitz, 1998, Functional connectivity of the angular gyrus in normal reading and dyslexia, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. source
- Not checked yetcites [53] Bokde, 2001, Functional interactions of the inferior frontal cortex during the processing of words and word-like stimuli, Neuron source
- Not checked yetcites [54] Giraud, 2001, The constraints functional neuroanatomy places on classical models of auditory word processing, J. Cogn. Neurosci. source
hedgedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Separate pathways in left and right hemispheres are integrated in the left lateralized Visual Word Form Area (VWFA), which mediates between visually specific input, and moreabstract linguistic areas responsible for lexical, semantic and phonological processes.”
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: unclear — It is unclear why the paper says it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Finally, ventral visual regions receive top-down attentional influences associated with left and right parietal regions that are likely to affect all processing levels, and whose impairment might therefore lead to various forms of neglect dyslexia.”
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper relies on this without support.
Writing was invented about 5400 years ago.
“given that the cultural invention of writing upon which this specialization is predicated did not exist until , 5400 years ago”
The paper relies on this without support.
5400 years is insufficient time for selective pressures to engineer a specialized module for visual word recognition.
“which is insufficient time for selective pressures to engineer a specialized 'module' for visual word recognition.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The VWFA is left lateralized in most subjects.
“Although the VWFA is left lateralized in most subjects”
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“we used NeuroSynth to replicate previous findings of visual category-specific activation in regions such as the fusiform face area (FFA12) and visual word form area (VWFA13”
From Large-scale automated synthesis of human functional neuroimaging data. (2011) · cites this paper as [13]
In the citing paper
“Interestingly, the region of posterior temporal cortex more active for the letter than category fluency conditions overlaps with an area implicated by previous studies as being involved in the visual processing of word forms (i.e., the visual word form areas, VWFA; McCandliss et al., 2003), as well as with other word processing sites that appears to have a multimodal function; i.e., for combining”
From Neural systems supporting lexical search guided by letter and semantic category cues: a self-paced overt response fMRI study of verbal fluency (2010) · cites this paper as McCandliss et al., 2003
In the citing paper
“This cortex is partially plastic and can, during ontogenesis, become progressively attuned to the requirements of reading (McCandliss et al., 2003).”
From Specialization within the ventral stream: the case for the visual word form area (2004) · cites this paper as McCandliss et al., 2003
In the citing paper
“Finally, it should be remembered that it takes years for children to develop expert word recognition (Aghababian and Nazir, 2000), and that the emergence of this expertise correlates with the amount of activation of the VWFA by letter strings in normal and dyslexic children (McCandliss et al., 2003; Shaywitz et al., 2002; Temple, 2002).”
From Specialization within the ventral stream: the case for the visual word form area (2004) · cites this paper as McCandliss et al., 2003
In the citing paper
“The left-FFG was found to be involved in letter identification and reading (McCandliss et al., 2003; Dehaene and Cohen, 2011; McNorgan et al., 2013).”
From Functional neuroimaging of visuospatial working memory tasks enables accurate detection of attention deficit and hyperactivity disorder (2015) · cites this paper as McCandliss et al., 2003
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.
Rated minor: it would not touch a result — a value no result rests on, a p-value that stays on the same side of the significance level, or a conflict that is clerical, resolved elsewhere in the paper, or outside its own findings.
In the paper
§ The perceptual expertise account · p. 4
“Subjects were engaged in a semantic classification task on target words and were not unaware of the presence of primes.”
§ The perceptual expertise account · p. 4
“This suggests that this area holds a case-invariant neural code for visual words and that this code can be activated automatically without awareness.”
Citations
Cites
The distributed human neural system for face perception
Haxby, J. V., Hoffman, E. A., & Gobbini, M. I. (2000) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/s1364-6613(00)01482-0 · Cited by 4,891
Cohen, L., Dehaene, S., Naccache, L., Lehéricy, S., Dehaene-Lambertz, G., Hénaff, M.-A., & Michel, F. (2000) · Brain · doi:10.1093/brain/123.2.291 · Cited by 1,954
Self-citationExpertise for cars and birds recruits brain areas involved in face recognition
Gauthier, I., Skudlarski, P., Gore, J. C., & Anderson, A. W. (2000) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/72140 · Cited by 1,418 · cited 1×
“These processing benefits are linked to functional reorganizations in the response properties of a region of the right fusiform gyrus [ 32 ], which are also associated with changes in the response properties of ERPs recorded within the first 200 ms of processing stimuli [33].”
BackgroundCerebral mechanisms of word masking and unconscious repetition priming
Dehaene, S., Naccache, L., Cohen, L., Bihan, D. L., Mangin, J.-F., Poline, J.-B., & Rivière, D. (2001) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/89551 · Cited by 1,305
Self-citationLanguage‐specific tuning of visual cortex? Functional properties of the Visual Word Form Area
Cohen, L., Lehéricy, S., Chochon, F., Lemer, C., Rivaud, S., & Dehaene, S. (2002) · Brain · doi:10.1093/brain/awf094 · Cited by 1,254 · cited 4×
“pseudowords), produce more robust fMRI responses than novel but poorly structured letter strings [ 8 ].”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialSelf-citationPerceptual recognition as a function of meaningfulness of stimulus material
Reicher, G. M. (1969) · Journal of Experimental Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0027768 · Cited by 1,252
Dyslexia: Cultural Diversity and Biological Unity
Paulesu, E., Démonet, J.-F., Fazio, F., McCrory, E., Chanoine, V., Brunswick, N., Cappa, S. F., Cossu, G., Habib, M., Frith, C. D., et al. (2001) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1057179 · Cited by 1,173
Disruption of posterior brain systems for reading in children with developmental dyslexia
Shaywitz, B. A., Shaywitz, S. E., Pugh, K. R., Mencl, W. E., Fulbright, R. K., Skudlarski, P., Constable, R. T., Marchione, K. E., Fletcher, J. M., Lyon, G. R., et al. (2002) · Biological Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/s0006-3223(02)01365-3 · Cited by 993
Functional disruption in the organization of the brain for reading in dyslexia
Shaywitz, S. E., Shaywitz, B. A., Pugh, K. R., Fulbright, R. K., Constable, R. T., Mencl, W. E., Shankweiler, D. P., Liberman, A. M., Skudlarski, P., Fletcher, J. M., et al. (1998) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.95.5.2636 · Cited by 872
Temple, E., Deutsch, G. K., Poldrack, R. A., Miller, S. L., Tallal, P., Merzenich, M. M., & Gabrieli, J. D. E. (2003) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0030098100 · Cited by 796
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- McCandliss, 2000, Habituating cognitive codes for individual words within the visual word form area: an event related fMRI study, J. Cogn. Neurosci. Suppl., 118
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 901–1,000 of 1,001
Neurocognitive signatures of phonemic sequencing in expert backward speakers
Torres‐Prioris, M. J., López-Barroso, D., Càmara, E., Fittipaldi, S., Sedeño, L., Ibáñez, A. M., Berthier, M. L., & García, A. M. (2020) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-020-67551-z · Cited by 12
Neural Representation in Visual Word Form Area during Word Reading
Lu, C., Li, H., Fu, R., Qu, J., Yue, Q., & Mei, L. (2020) · Neuroscience · doi:10.1016/j.neuroscience.2020.10.040 · Cited by 12
Word Processing differences between dyslexic and control children
Paul, I., Bott, C., Wienbruch, C., & Elbert, T. R. (2006) · BMC Psychiatry · doi:10.1186/1471-244x-6-5 · Cited by 12
Visual Binding of English and Chinese Word Parts is Limited to Low Temporal Frequencies
Holcombe, A. O., & Judson, J. (2007) · Perception · doi:10.1068/p5582 · Cited by 13
A neural marker of medical visual expertise: implications for training
Rourke, L., Cruikshank, L. C., Shapke, L., & Singhal, A. (2016) · Advances in Health Sciences Education · doi:10.1007/s10459-016-9712-7 · Cited by 12
Wang, F., Kaneshiro, B., Toomarian, E. Y., Gosavi, R. S., Hasak, L. R., Moron, S., Nguyen, Q. T. H., Norcia, A. M., & McCandliss, B. D. (2023) · Developmental Science · doi:10.1111/desc.13435 · Cited by 11
Self-citationOrigins of food selectivity in human visual cortex
Henderson, M. M., Tarr, M. J., & Wehbe, L. (2025) · Trends in Neurosciences · doi:10.1016/j.tins.2024.12.001 · Cited by 11
Ünal, Z. E., Park, Y., Şimşek, E., Menon, V., & Geary, D. C. (2025) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-025-63259-8 · Cited by 13
Neurokognitive Korrelate der Dyslexie
Linkersdörfer, J. (2010) · Kindheit und Entwicklung · doi:10.1026/0942-5403/a000035 · Cited by 11
Horwitz, B., & WISE, R. J. S. (2008) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-08-045352-1.00007-0 · Cited by 11
Little, D., Snyder, J. S., & Elhilali, M. (2020) · PLoS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1007746 · Cited by 12
Neural pattern similarity across concept exemplars predicts memory after a long delay
Bruett, H., Calloway, R. C., Tokowicz, N., & Coutanche, M. N. (2020) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2020.117030 · Cited by 11
Bonandrini, R., Veronelli, L., Licciardo, D., Caporali, A., Judica, E., Corbo, M., & Luzzatti, C. (2020) · Neurocase · doi:10.1080/13554794.2020.1830118 · Cited by 11
The Effects of Word Identity, Case, and SOA on Word Priming in a Subliminal Context
Peel, H. J., Royals, K. A., & Chouinard, P. A. (2021) · Journal of Psycholinguistic Research · doi:10.1007/s10936-021-09783-2 · Cited by 11
Difference Between Children and Adults in the Print-speech Coactivated Network
He, Y., Liu, X., Hu, J., Nichols, E. S., Lu, C.-M., & Liu, L. (2021) · Scientific Studies of Reading · doi:10.1080/10888438.2021.1965607 · Cited by 10
Dyslexia: Causes and Concomitant Impairments
Werth, R. (2023) · Brain Sciences · doi:10.3390/brainsci13030472 · Cited by 11
Music literacy improves reading skills via bilateral orthographic development
Pantaleo, M. M., Arcuri, G., Manfredi, M., & Proverbio, A. M. (2024) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-024-54204-8 · Cited by 11
Rezaie, R., Simos, P. G., Fletcher, J. M., Juranek, J. J., Cirino, P. T., Li, Z., Passaro, A. D., & Papanicolaou, A. C. (2011) · Frontiers in Human Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnhum.2011.00045 · Cited by 11
Glezer, L. S., Jiang, X., Luetje, M. M., Napoliello, E. M., Kim, J. S., Riesenhuber, M., & Eden, G. F. (2019) · Brain and Language · doi:10.1016/j.bandl.2019.01.002 · Cited by 13
Ma, X., Kang, J., Li, X., Maurer, U., Cao, X., & Sommer, W. (2022) · Psychophysiology · doi:10.1111/psyp.14006 · Cited by 10
Marinelli, C. V., Martelli, M., Praphamontripong, P., Zoccolotti, P., & Abadzi, H. (2013) · World Bank, Washington, DC eBooks · doi:10.1596/16244 · Cited by 11
Learning From Examples Versus Verbal Directions in Mathematical Problem Solving
Lee, H. S., Fincham, J. M., & Anderson, J. R. (2015) · Mind Brain and Education · doi:10.1111/mbe.12096 · Cited by 11
Reading faces: Investigating the use of a novel face-based orthography in acquired alexia
Moore, M. W., Brendel, P. C., & Fiez, J. A. (2014) · Brain and Language · doi:10.1016/j.bandl.2013.11.005 · Cited by 11
Hiwa, S., Katayama, T., & Hiroyasu, T. (2018) · Brain and Behavior · doi:10.1002/brb3.1104 · Cited by 13
Acha, J., & Carreiras, M. (2014) · The Mental Lexicon · doi:10.1075/ml.9.2.03ach · Cited by 11
ERP Correlates of Altered Orthographic-Phonological Processing in Dyslexia
Varga, V., Tóth, D., Amora, K. K., Czikora, D., & Csépe, V. (2021) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2021.723404 · Cited by 10
Reading Reshapes Stimulus Selectivity in the Visual Word Form Area
Chauhan, V. S., McCook, K. C., & White, A. L. (2024) · eNeuro · doi:10.1523/eneuro.0228-24.2024 · Cited by 10
Allaman, L., Mottaz, A., & Guggisberg, A. G. (2021) · Clinical Neurophysiology · doi:10.1016/j.clinph.2021.05.029 · Cited by 10
Zhou, H., Yao, Y., Geng, F., Chen, F., & Hu, Y. (2022) · Neuroscience · doi:10.1016/j.neuroscience.2022.11.006 · Cited by 10
Bonandrini, R., Paulesu, E., Traficante, D., Capelli, E., Marelli, M., & Luzzatti, C. (2023) · Neuropsychologia · doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2023.108468 · Cited by 10
Ramezani, M. H., Behzadipour, S., Fawcett, A. J., & Joghataei, M. T. (2023) · Dyslexia · doi:10.1002/dys.1747 · Cited by 10
Sarch, G. H., Tarr, M. J., Fragkiadaki, K., & Wehbe, L. (2023) · neural information processing systems · doi:10.52202/075280-2006 · Cited by 14
Krefta, M., Michałowski, B., Kowalczyk, J., & Króliczak, G. (2015) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01159 · Cited by 10
Reading and coherent motion perception in school age children
Kassaliete, E., Lācis, I., Fomins, S., & Krūmiņa, G. (2015) · Annals of Dyslexia · doi:10.1007/s11881-015-0099-6 · Cited by 10
Luo, B., Shan, C., Zhu, R., Weng, X., & He, S. (2011) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0023997 · Cited by 10
Embodying the Mind by Extending It
Jacob, P. (2012) · Review of Philosophy and Psychology · doi:10.1007/s13164-012-0087-2 · Cited by 10
How is dysfluent reading reflected in the ERP?
Bergmann, J., Hutzler, F., Klimesch, W., & Wimmer, H. (2005) · Journal of Neurolinguistics · doi:10.1016/j.jneuroling.2004.11.004 · Cited by 10
Burgund, E. D., Guo, Y., & Aurbach, E. L. (2008) · Experimental Brain Research · doi:10.1007/s00221-008-1661-9 · Cited by 10
Reading in Devanagari: Insights from functional neuroimaging
Singh, N. C., & Rao, C. (2014) · Indian journal of radiology and imaging - new series/Indian journal of radiology and imaging/Indian Journal of Radiology & Imaging · doi:10.4103/0971-3026.130691 · Cited by 10
Facing a Regular World: How Spatial Object Structure Shapes Visual Processing
KAISER, D. H., & Haselhuhn, T. (2017) · Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.3441-16.2017 · Cited by 10
Francisco, A. A., Takashima, A., McQueen, J. M., van den Bunt, M. R., Jesse, A., & Groen, M. A. (2018) · Neuropsychologia · doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2018.07.009 · Cited by 10
Is holistic processing of written words modulated by phonology?
Ventura, P., Fernandes, T., Leite, I., Pereira, A., & Wong, A. C. ‐. (2019) · Acta Psychologica · doi:10.1016/j.actpsy.2019.102944 · Cited by 10
You, Y., Correas, Á., Keehn, R. J. J., Wagner, L. C., Rosen, B. Q., Beaton, L. E., Gao, Y., Brocklehurst, W. T., Fishman, I., Müller, R., et al. (2020) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/bhaa279 · Cited by 11
Validation of The Reading House and Association With Cortical Thickness
Hutton, J., Dudley, J. A., Huang, G., Horowitz‐Kraus, T., DeWitt, T. G., Ittenbach, R. F., & Holland, S. K. (2021) · PEDIATRICS · doi:10.1542/peds.2020-1641 · Cited by 10
Khosla, M., & Wehbe, L. (2026) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-026-73938-9 · Cited by 11
Spatiotemporal dynamics of single-letter reading: a combined ERP-FMRI study.
Casarotto, S., Bianchi, A. M., Ricciardi, E., Gentili, C., Vanello, N., Guazzelli, M., Pietrini, P., Chiarenza, G. A., & Cerutti, S. (2008) · PubMed · Cited by 10
Neurokognitive Korrelate der Dyskalkulie
Lonnemann, J., Linkersdörfer, J., Hasselhorn, M., & Lindberg, S. I. (2010) · Kindheit und Entwicklung · doi:10.1026/0942-5403/a000036 · Cited by 10
Research in Visual Pattern Recognition: The Enduring Legacy of Studies From the 1960s
Goolkasian, P. A. (2012) · The American Journal of Psychology · doi:10.5406/amerjpsyc.125.2.0155 · Cited by 10
Veronica, C., Amiruddin, A., Clunies‐Ross, K. L., French, N., & Fox, A. M. (2017) · Journal of Neuroscience Methods · doi:10.1016/j.jneumeth.2017.03.010 · Cited by 10
Ridder, W. H. (2019) · Documenta Ophthalmologica · doi:10.1007/s10633-019-09712-8 · Cited by 10
Objects and scenes classification with selective use of central and peripheral image content
Alameer, A., Degenaar, P. A., & Nazarpour, K. (2019) · Journal of Visual Communication and Image Representation · doi:10.1016/j.jvcir.2019.102698 · Cited by 10
Integrating functional connectivity and MVPA through a multiple constraint network analysis
McNorgan, C., Smith, G. J., & Edwards, E. S. (2019) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2019.116412 · Cited by 10
Early signatures of and developmental change in brain regions for theory of mind
Richardson, H., & Saxe, R. R. (2020) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-814411-4.00021-4 · Cited by 13
Word Detection in Individual Subjects Is Difficult to Probe With Fast Periodic Visual Stimulation
Barnes, L., Petit, S., Badcock, N. A., Whyte, C. J., & Woolgar, A. (2021) · Frontiers in Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnins.2021.602798 · Cited by 10
Coolidge, F. L. (2020) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780190940942.001.0001 · Cited by 11
Wortformgedächtnis als intuitive Statistik in Sprachen mit unterschiedlicher Konsistenz
Jacobs, A. M., & Graf, R. (2005) · Zeitschrift für Psychologie · doi:10.1026/0044-3409.213.3.133 · Cited by 10
The Content and Acquisition of Lexical Concepts
Horsey, R. (2006) · CogPrints (University of Southampton) · Cited by 10
Basic Level Categorization Facilitates Visual Object RecognitionPreprint
Wang, P., & Cottrell, G. W. (2015) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1511.04103 · Cited by 15
Writing system transmission and change: A neurofunctional perspectivePreprint
Overmann, K. A. (2023) · doi:10.31235/osf.io/esmkw · Cited by 10
Adrián‐Ventura, J., Ferrer, M. S., Fuentes‐Claramonte, P., Morte-Soriano, M. R., Parcet, M. A., & Ávila, C. (2019) · Journal of Neurolinguistics · doi:10.1016/j.jneuroling.2019.100873 · Cited by 9
The Neural Signature of Statistical Learning of Orthography
Tong, X., Wang, Y., & Tong, S. X. (2020) · Frontiers in Human Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnhum.2020.00026 · Cited by 9
Optimal Word Reading Rate as Evidenced by Frequency-tagging Electrophysiology
Marchive, M., Rossion, B., & Lochy, A. (2025) · Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1162/jocn_a_02286 · Cited by 9
The homophone effect during visual word recognition in children: an fMRI study
Newman, S. D. (2011) · Psychological Research · doi:10.1007/s00426-011-0347-2 · Cited by 9
Park, J., Park, D. C., & Polk, T. A. (2012) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0031512 · Cited by 9
Peters, J. C., Reithler, J., & Goebel, R. (2012) · Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fncom.2012.00012 · Cited by 9
Electroencephalographic Asymmetries in Human Cognition
Mazza, V., & Pagano, S. (2017) · Neuromethods · doi:10.1007/978-1-4939-6725-4_13 · Cited by 9
Dissociating frequency and animacy effects in visual word processing: An fMRI study
Rundle, M. M., Coch, D., Connolly, A. C., & Granger, R. (2018) · Brain and Language · doi:10.1016/j.bandl.2018.05.005 · Cited by 9
Twait, E. L., & Horowitz‐Kraus, T. (2019) · Brain Connectivity · doi:10.1089/brain.2018.0655 · Cited by 9
Improving Orthographic Awareness and Reading Fluency in Chinese Children with Dyslexia: A Case Study
Zhang, W., Zhang, L., Liu, L., & Zhang, S. (2020) · Reading & Writing Quarterly · doi:10.1080/10573569.2019.1707731 · Cited by 9
Functional connectivity of the left inferior frontal gyrus during semantic priming
Roelke, A., & Hofmann, M. (2020) · Neuroscience Letters · doi:10.1016/j.neulet.2020.135236 · Cited by 9
Animal models of developmental dyslexia: Where we are and what we are missing
Lampis, V., Ventura, R., Segni, M. D., Marino, C., D'Amato, F. R., & Mascheretti, S. (2021) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2021.10.022 · Cited by 9
Proverbio, A. M., Arcuri, G., Pantaleo, M. M., Zani, A., & Manfredi, M. (2024) · Frontiers in Cognition · doi:10.3389/fcogn.2024.1323220 · Cited by 10
Locating the cortical bottleneck for slow reading in peripheral vision
Yu, D., Jiang, Y., Legge, G. E., & He, S. (2015) · Journal of Vision · doi:10.1167/15.11.3 · Cited by 9
Early perception of written syllables in French: An event-related potential study
Doignon‐Camus, N., Bonnefond, A., Touzalin-Chretien, P., & Dufour, A. (2009) · Brain and Language · doi:10.1016/j.bandl.2009.06.002 · Cited by 9
A possible functional localiser for identifying brain regions sensitive to sentence-level prosody
Fedorenko, E. G., Hsieh, P., & Balewski, Z. Z. (2013) · Language Cognition and Neuroscience · doi:10.1080/01690965.2013.861917 · Cited by 9
Berthier, M. L., Friedemann Pulvermüller, A., Green, C., & Higueras, C. (2006) · Aphasiology · doi:10.1080/02687030500484004 · Cited by 9
Decoding Language from the Brain
Murphy, B., Wehbe, L., & Fyshe, A. (2017) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781316676974.003 · Cited by 10
The role of memory in language and communication
Dyke, J. A. V. (2012) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-323-07201-4.00014-3 · Cited by 9
Henderson, M. M., Tarr, M. J., & Wehbe, L. (2023) · Journal of Vision · doi:10.1167/jov.23.4.8 · Cited by 11
Examining the Construct of Reading among Dysfluent Urban Children: A Factor Analysis Approach
Pierce, M. E., Katzir, T., Wolf, M., & Noam, G. G. (2010) · Journal of Literacy Research · doi:10.1080/10862961003796140 · Cited by 9
The Unnoticed Contributions of the Cerebellum to Language
Walter, N., & Joanette, Y. (2007) · Folia Phoniatrica et Logopaedica · doi:10.1159/000102928 · Cited by 10
Jones, N. (2017) · A Peer-Reviewed Journal About · doi:10.7146/aprja.v6i1.116009 · Cited by 8
Yao, J. N., Wang, Q., Geng, L., Zhao, Z., Zhao, Y., Teng, Y., He, Y., Zhang, Y., Li, Q., Qiu, S., et al. (2025) · Advanced Materials · doi:10.1002/adma.202506367 · Cited by 8
Structural and functional connectivity of the inferior temporal numeral area
Conrad, B. N., Pollack, C., Yeo, D. J. S., & Price, G. R. (2022) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/bhac492 · Cited by 9
Contribution of the language network to the comprehension of Python programming code.
Liu, Y.-F., Wilson, C., & Bedny, M. (2024) · Brain and Language · doi:10.1016/j.bandl.2024.105392 · Cited by 5
Dynamic functional connectivity in verbal cognitive control and word reading
Sakakura, K., Brennan, M., Sonoda, M., Mitsuhashi, T., Luat, A. F., Marupudi, N. I., Sood, S., & Asano, E. (2024) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2024.120863 · Cited by 8
Hypnotic ability and baseline attention: fMRI findings from Stroop interference.
Lifshitz, M., & Raz, A. (2015) · Psychology of Consciousness Theory Research and Practice · doi:10.1037/cns0000050 · Cited by 9
The White Matter Module-Hub Network of Semantics Revealed by Semantic Dementia
Sundqvist, M., Routier, A., Dubois, B., Olivier Colliot, A., & Teichmann, M. (2020) · Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1162/jocn_a_01549 · Cited by 9
Moret‐Tatay, C., Baixauli, I., Sevilla, M. D. G., & Irigaray, T. Q. (2020) · Mathematics · doi:10.3390/math8050699 · Cited by 8
Wong, Y. K., Tong, C. K.-Y., Lui, M. A., & Wong, A. C. ‐. (2021) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0243440 · Cited by 8
Case Report: Cognitive Conversion in a Non-brazilian VAPB Mutation Carrier (ALS8)
Temp, A. G. M., Dyrba, M., Kasper, E., Teipel, S. J., & Prudlo, J. (2021) · Frontiers in Neurology · doi:10.3389/fneur.2021.668772 · Cited by 8
Level of Orthographic Knowledge Helps to Reveal Automatic Predictions in Visual Word Processing
Huang, Z., Yang, S., Xue, L., Yang, H., Lv, Y., & Zhao, J. (2022) · Frontiers in Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnins.2021.809574 · Cited by 8
Lateralization of orthographic processing in fixed-gaze and natural reading conditions
Nárai, Á., Nemecz, Z., Vidnyánszky, Z., & Weiss, B. (2022) · Cortex · doi:10.1016/j.cortex.2022.07.017 · Cited by 8
Brain, Behavior, and Culture: Insights from Cognition, Perception, and Emotion
Rule, N. O., Freeman, J. B., & Ambady, N. (2010) · On thinking · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-15423-2_7 · Cited by 8
What does rapid naming tell us about dyslexia
Araújo, S., Faísca, L., Petersson, K. M., & Reis, A. (2011) · Max Planck Digital Library · Cited by 8
Lopes, R., Nunes, R. G., Simões, M. R., Secca, M. F., & Leal, A. (2015) · Epilepsy & Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.yebeh.2015.04.019 · Cited by 8
Mórocz, I. Á., Janoos, F., van Gelderen, P., Manor, D., Karni, A., Breznitz, Z., von Aster, M., Kushnir, T., & Shalev, R. S. (2012) · International Journal of Imaging Systems and Technology · doi:10.1002/ima.22009 · Cited by 8
Event-related potential (ERP) correlates of memory blocking and priming during a word fragment test
Rass, O., Landau, J. D., Curran, T., & Leynes, P. A. (2010) · International Journal of Psychophysiology · doi:10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2010.07.001 · Cited by 8
Liu, J., Li, J., Rieth, C. A., Huber, D. E., Tian, J., & Lee, K. (2011) · Neuropsychologia · doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2011.01.011 · Cited by 8
Metadata
- Authors
- McCandliss, B. D., Cohen, L., & Dehaene, S.
- Affiliations
- Cornell University (US)
- Inserm (FR)
- Corresponding author
- McCandliss, Bruce D.
- Venue
- Trends in Cognitive Sciences
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2003-07
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 293-299
- ISSN
- 1364-6613 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2143709903
- Semantic Scholar
- efc50447601a00424b368385d84c969f5e00395f
- Cited by
- 1,489
- References
- 55
- Citations by year
- 2026: 41 · 2025: 43 · 2024: 63 · 2023: 56 · 2022: 52 · 2021: 69 · 2020: 84 · 2019: 84 · 2018: 65 · 2017: 61 · 2016: 71 · 2015: 79 · 2014: 85 · 2013: 66 · 2012: 78
- FWCI
- 8.67
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Trends in Cognitive Sciences (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Reading and Literacy Development
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Visual perception and processing mechanisms
- Keywords
- visual word form area, fusiform gyrus, reading, visual word recognition, visual expertise, functional reorganization, brain specialization, writing systems, visual cortex
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-10-08, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).
A second model labelled each claim on 2026-10-08 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
