Cited by 330Neural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesCognitive Abilities and TestingDevelopmental and Educational Neuropsychology

Working memory performance in typically developing children and adolescents: Behavioral evidence of protracted frontal lobe development

Conklin, Heather M., Luciana, Monica, Hooper, Catalina J., Yarger, Rebecca S.·2007·Developmental Neuropsychology

Abstract

Post-mortem histological and in vivo neuroimaging findings both reveal frontal lobe development that extends beyond the adolescent years. Few studies have examined whether this protracted neurodevelopment coincides with improvements in adolescent performance on putative frontal lobe tasks. An instrumental function supported by the frontal lobes is working memory, the ability to maintain and manipulate information online. This study investigated the performance of typically developing children and adolescents on a battery of working memory tasks. Findings revealed an improvement in performance on most working memory tasks across the adolescent years. In contrast, no improvement was observed on tasks largely supported by more posterior neural substrates. Current findings indicate a similar unfolding of the executive aspects of verbal working memory as previously demonstrated with spatial working memory. Factor analysis revealed a grouping of working memory tasks based largely on task demands, irrespective of working memory domain, adding support for process-specific models of prefrontal organization. Important implications for typical and atypical frontal lobe development are discussed.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1207/s15326942dn3101_6

Cites

60 of 60 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Conklin, H. M., Luciana, M., Hooper, C. J., & Yarger, R. S.
Affiliations
University of Minnesota (US)
Venue
Developmental Neuropsychology
Published
2007-01
Volume
31
Issue
1
Pages
103-128
ISSN
  • 1532-6942 (ISSN-L)
  • 8756-5641
OpenAlex
W1994158758
Cited by
330
References
60
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 23 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 21 · 2016: 20 · 2015: 28 · 2014: 20 · 2013: 23 · 2012: 21
FWCI
9.15
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Developmental Neuropsychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Abilities and Testing
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology › Developmental and Educational Neuropsychology
Keywords
working memory, frontal lobe development, adolescents, children, verbal working memory, spatial working memory, executive function, task demands, typically developing children
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Age Factors, Attention, Child, Child Development, Depth Perception, Female, Frontal Lobe, Humans, Male, Memory, Short-Term, Orientation, Pattern Recognition, Visual, Problem Solving, Psychomotor Performance, Reference Values, Serial Learning, Verbal Learning, Prefrontal Cortex

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review