Cited by 579Face Recognition and PerceptionChild and Animal Learning DevelopmentChild and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development

Effects of early experience on children's recognition of facial displays of emotion.

Pollak, Seth D., Sinha, Pawan·2002·Developmental Psychology

Abstract

The present research examines visual perception of emotion in both typical and atypical development. To examine the processes by which perceptual mechanisms become attuned to the contingencies of affective signals in the environment, the authors measured the sequential, content-based properties of feature detection in emotion recognition processes. To evaluate the role of experience, they compared typically developing children with physically abused children, who were presumed to have experienced high levels of threat and hostility. As predicted, physically abused children accurately identified facial displays of anger on the basis of less sensory input than did controls, which suggests that physically abused children have facilitated access to representations of anger. The findings are discussed in terms of experiential processes in perceptual learning.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/0012-1649.38.5.784

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • School-aged physically abused children have been shown to be highly sensitive to degraded threat signals, which may reduce constant vigilance in an abusive home.

    “School-aged physically abused children, on the other hand, have been shown to be highly sensitive to even very degraded signals of threat, which although potentially maladaptive in some contexts, may provide some relief from constant vigilance in the abusive home (Pollak, Cicchetti, & Klorman, 1998; Pollak & Sinha, 2002; Shackman, Shackman, & Pollak, 2007).”
  • Children who have been physically abused have a lower threshold to detect angry facial expression than children who were not abused.

    “Children who have been physically abused have a lower threshold to detect angry facial expression than children who were not abused (Pollak and Sinha, 2002), indicating a potential bias to threatening stimuli, presumably due to the salience of anger in the environment for abused children.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Pollak, S. D., & Sinha, P.
Affiliations
University of Wisconsin–Madison (US)
Venue
Developmental Psychology
Published
2002
Volume
38
Issue
5
Pages
784-791
ISSN
  • 0012-1649 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-0599
OpenAlex
W4249514754
Cited by
579
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 19 · 2025: 21 · 2024: 23 · 2023: 31 · 2022: 40 · 2021: 41 · 2020: 27 · 2019: 43 · 2018: 28 · 2017: 28 · 2016: 31 · 2015: 36 · 2014: 23 · 2013: 26 · 2012: 23
FWCI
3.85
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Developmental Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Mental Health (MH61285, R01MH061285)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Face Recognition and Perception
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Child and Animal Learning Development
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
Keywords
early life experience, facial emotion recognition, emotional expression, children, social experience
MeSH terms
Child, Child Abuse, Emotions, Facial Expression, Female, Humans, Identification, Psychological, Life Change Events, Male, Personality Development, Social Perception, Recognition, Psychology

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review