The DOI matches its Crossref record; 242 of the 242 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Intelligence, personality, and interests: Evidence for overlapping traits
Abstract
The authors review the development of the modern paradigm for intelligence assessment and application and consider the differentiation between intelligence-as-maximal performance and intelligence-as-typical performance. They review theories of intelligence, personality, and interest as a means to establish potential overlap. Consideration of intelligence-as-typical performance provides a basis for evaluation of intelligence-personality and intelligence-interest relations. Evaluation of relations among personality constructs, vocational interests, and intellectual abilities provides evidence for communality across the domains of personality of J. L. Holland's (1959) model of vocational interests. The authors provide an extensive meta-analysis of personality-intellectual ability correlations, and a review of interest-intellectual ability associations. They identify 4 trait complexes: social, clerical/conventional, science/math, and intellectual/cultural.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Openness-related traits are widely acknowledged correlates of cognitive abilities (17).”
From Meta-analytic relations between personality and cognitive ability (2023) · cites this paper as [17]
In the citing paper
“Second, investment of intelligence into acquired knowledge (i.e., invested abilities) was found to require a hungry mind (i.e., openness traits) and interest in the domain of knowledge to be acquired (17, 19).”
From Meta-analytic relations between personality and cognitive ability (2023) · cites this paper as [17]
In the citing paper
“A few meta-analyses have summarized available research (e.g., refs. 17–21).”
From Meta-analytic relations between personality and cognitive ability (2023) · cites this paper as [17]
In the citing paper
“Although considerable research has examined the correlates and consequences of cognitive abilities and personality traits independently, much less is known about their connections.”
From Meta-analytic relations between personality and cognitive ability (2023) · cites this paper as [17]
In the citing paper
“This investment process underpins the emergence of knowledge acquisition trait complexes (17) and intellectual engagement (19).”
From Meta-analytic relations between personality and cognitive ability (2023) · cites this paper as [17]
In the citing paper
“Thus, invested abilities displayed larger relations with openness traits, especially its intellect, non traditional,* need for cognition, and openness to ideas facets.”
From Meta-analytic relations between personality and cognitive ability (2023) · cites this paper as [17]
In the citing paper
“First, cognitive abilities were moderately associated with a variety of openness-related traits (17, 19) but appeared to have weak relations with other personality characteristics (18).”
From Meta-analytic relations between personality and cognitive ability (2023) · cites this paper as [17]
In the citing paper
“In contrast to previous meta-analyses that reported mostly null effects for extraversion–abilities relations (17, 18), our larger dataset and more nuanced construct structures revealed previously unacknowledged relations.”
From Meta-analytic relations between personality and cognitive ability (2023) · cites this paper as [17]
In the citing paper
“Overall, these intellect-related traits’ relations were in line with previous meta-analytic estimates (17, 19) (mean ρ^ = .21, mean 95% CI [.13, .29])”
From Meta-analytic relations between personality and cognitive ability (2023) · cites this paper as [17]
In the citing paper
“Openness to Experience, however, is the only Big Five factor with moderate associations with general intelligence ( 0.33 r in a meta-analysis by Ackerman and Heggestad [1997])”
From Personality Psychology and Economics (2011) · cites this paper as Ackerman and Heggestad [1997]
In the citing paper
“A meta-analysis conducted by Ackerman and Heggestad (1997) found generally positive relationships with extraversion across ten intelligence traits.”
From Extraversion and intelligence: A meta-analytic investigation (2005) · cites this paper as Ackerman & Heggestad, 1997
In the citing paper
“Results from a meta-analysis between personality and intelligence conducted by Ackerman and Heggestad (1997), however, found relatively consistent modest positive relations between extraversion and intelligence.”
From Extraversion and intelligence: A meta-analytic investigation (2005) · cites this paper as Ackerman & Heggestad, 1997
In the citing paper
“Their findings, shown in Table 2, indicate a positive relationship of the estimated effect sizes for extraversion across the ability categories ranging from 0.05 to 0.14 (Ackerman & Heggestad, 1997).”
From Extraversion and intelligence: A meta-analytic investigation (2005) · cites this paper as Ackerman & Heggestad, 1997
In the citing paper
“The pervasive decrease in the estimated effect sizes in the current study compared to the Ackerman and Heggestad (1997) results provides initial support for this hypothesis.”
From Extraversion and intelligence: A meta-analytic investigation (2005) · cites this paper as Ackerman and Heggestad (1997)
In the citing paper
“Consistent with past research (Ackerman and Heggestad, 1997; Zeidner and Matthews, 2000; Zeidner, 1995), all of the estimated effect sizes were close to zero.”
From Extraversion and intelligence: A meta-analytic investigation (2005) · cites this paper as Ackerman and Heggestad, 1997
In the citing paper
“A closer comparison with the Ackerman and Heggestad (1997) results reveals that most of the estimated effect sizes from the current study are slightly smaller (compare Table 2 and Table 9).”
From Extraversion and intelligence: A meta-analytic investigation (2005) · cites this paper as Ackerman and Heggestad, 1997
In the citing paper
“Exclusion criteria were designed to retain studies useful in the present meta-analysis and consistent with the studies used in the Ackerman and Heggestad (1997) meta-analysis to avoid a selection confound.”
From Extraversion and intelligence: A meta-analytic investigation (2005) · cites this paper as Ackerman & Heggestad, 1997
In the citing paper
“For example, about 27 additional studies (an average increase of 60%) were located beyond those located in the Ackerman and Heggestad (1997) meta-analysis for the three most studied ability-personality combinations (extraversion crossed with crystallized intelligence, general intelligence, and fluid intelligence).”
From Extraversion and intelligence: A meta-analytic investigation (2005) · cites this paper as Ackerman and Heggestad, 1997
In the citing paper
“Similar to the Ackerman and Heggestad (1997) meta-analysis, the extraversion-intelligence relationship was slightly positive, and different patterns of relationships were found for social closeness and social potency.”
From Extraversion and intelligence: A meta-analytic investigation (2005) · cites this paper as Ackerman and Heggestad (1997)
In the citing paper
“Almost universally, the estimated effects sizes in the current study were less than the estimated effect sizes in the Ackerman and Heggestad (1997) meta-analysis, and almost universally, the correlations of the extraversion-intelligence association and date of publication for the ability-personality categories were negative.”
From Extraversion and intelligence: A meta-analytic investigation (2005) · cites this paper as Ackerman and Heggestad (1997)
In the citing paper
“Also, vocational interests are related to cognitive abilities (Ackerman & Heggestad, 1997), self-efficacy beliefs (Rottinghaus et al., 2003), values and goals (Stoll et al., 2020).”
From The German O*NET Interest Profiler Short Form (2023) · cites this paper as Ackerman & Heggestad, 1997
In the citing paper
“All tests of intelligence or cognitive aptitude are optimal performance assessments, whereas measures of thinking dispositions are often assessed under typical performance conditions (Ackerman & Heggestad, 1997;Cacioppo, Petty, Feinstein, & Jarvis, 1996;Norris & Ennis, 1989;Perkins, 1995;Sternberg, 2003;Zeidner & Matthews, 2000).”
From The Cognitive Reflection Test as a predictor of performance on heuristics-and-biases tasks (2011) · cites this paper as Ackerman & Heggestad, 1997
In the citing paper
“Moreover, because Openness is positively correlated with a broad range of cognitive abilities, including vocabulary (Ackerman & Heggestad, 1997; Gignac, Stough, & Loukomitis, 2004), it is reasonable to suppose that highly Open individuals use “big words” more often, effectively resulting in strong positive correlations for many individual words (but conversely, producing negative correlations for”
From Personality in 100,000 Words: A large-scale analysis of personality and word use among bloggers (2010) · cites this paper as Ackerman & Heggestad, 1997
Citations
Cites
The Structure of Scientific Revolutions
Kuhn, T. S., & Schlegel, R. (1963) · Physics Today · doi:10.1063/1.3050879 · Cited by 35,538
Wasserman, S. S., Hedges, L. V., & Olkin, I. (1988) · Journal of Educational Statistics · doi:10.2307/1164953 · Cited by 10,377
Personality Structure: Emergence Of The 5-Factor Model
Digman, J. M. (1990) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.ps.41.020190.002221 · Cited by 6,731
An alternative "description of personality": The Big-Five factor structure.
Goldberg, L. R. (1990) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037//0022-3514.59.6.1216 · Cited by 6,652
Essentials of Psychological Testing
Rosner, B., & Cronbach, L. J. (1960) · The American Journal of Psychology · doi:10.2307/1419921 · Cited by 4,524
The Handbook of Research Synthesis.
Howel, D., Cooper, H., & Hedges, L. V. (1995) · Biometrics · doi:10.2307/2533295 · Cited by 3,657
Four ways five factors are basic
Costa, P. T., & McCrae, R. R. (1992) · Personality and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/0191-8869(92)90236-i · Cited by 3,594
Human cognitive abilities a survey of factor-analytic studies
Carroll, J. B. (2004) · Cited by 3,395
Handbook of Educational Psychology
Berliner, D. C., & Calfee, R. C. (2013) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9780203053874 · Cited by 3,212
Mbti Manual: A Guide to the Development and Use of the Myers-briggs Type Indicator
Myers, I. B., McCaulley, M. H., & Most, R. B. (1985) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 2,783
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 101–200 of 1,720
Li, W., Fay, D., Fresé, M., Harms, P. D., & Gao, X. Y. (2014) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0036169 · Cited by 281
“Personality changes may follow because people come to see themselves differently (Ackerman & Heggestad, 1997) and develop a tendency to seek more difficult tasks in the future (Locke & Latham, 2006).”
BackgroundTop 1 in 10,000: A 10-year follow-up of the profoundly gifted.
Lubinski, D., Webb, R. M., Morelock, M. J., & Benbow, C. P. (2001) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.86.4.718 · Cited by 308
Shute, V. J., & Towle, B. (2003) · Educational Psychologist · doi:10.1207/s15326985ep3802_5 · Cited by 286
Jackson, J. J., Hill, P. L., Payne, B. R., Roberts, B. W., & Stine-Morrow, E. A. L. (2012) · Psychology and Aging · doi:10.1037/a0025918 · Cited by 265
Furnham, A., Forde, L., & Cotter, T. (1998) · Personality and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/s0191-8869(97)00169-4 · Cited by 264
Zuffianò, A., Alessandri, G., Gerbino, M., Kanacri, B. P. L., Giunta, L. D., Milioni, M., & Caprara, G. V. (2012) · Learning and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2012.07.010 · Cited by 296
Reconsidering forced-choice item formats for applicant personality assessment
Christiansen, N. D., Burns, G. N., & Montgomery, G. E. (2005) · Human Performance · doi:10.1207/s15327043hup1803_4 · Cited by 250
“One of the advantages to personality tests is that they are relatively uncorrelated with cognitive tests (Ackerman & Heggestad, 1997) and therefore have potential to explain additional criterion variance (e.g., Schmidt & Hunter, 1998).”
BackgroundThe Big Five and tertiary academic performance: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Vedel, A. (2014) · Personality and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/j.paid.2014.07.011 · Cited by 263
“The integrative trait-complex approach by Ackerman and Heggestad (1997) encompassing cognitive, affective, and motivational variables is very inclusive and has indeed proven useful in predicting both grades and attrition rates in tertiary education (Ackerman, Kanfer, & Beier, 2013).”
BackgroundSex differences in the right tail of cognitive abilities: A 30 year examination
Wai, J., Cacchio, M., Putallaz, M., & Makel, M. C. (2010) · Intelligence · doi:10.1016/j.intell.2010.04.006 · Cited by 252
“…found to covary with different motivational propensities in both education and the world of work, which may in turn have implications for commitment to developing expertise in high level STEM arenas (Ackerman, 1996; Ackerman & Heggestad, 1997; Schmidt, Lubinski, & Benbow, 1998; Webb et al., 2007).”
BackgroundFostering and Measuring Skills: Interventions that Improve Character and CognitionPreprint
Heckman, J. J., & Kautz, T. (2013) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.2363237 · Cited by 255
Intellect as distinct from openness: Differences revealed by fMRI of working memory.
DeYoung, C. G., Shamosh, N. A., Green, A. E., Braver, T. S., & Gray, J. R. (2009) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0016615 · Cited by 261
Iddekinge, C. H. V., Roth, P. L., Putka, D. J., & Lanivich, S. E. (2011) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0024343 · Cited by 284
Cognitive Ability and Variation in Selection Task Performance
Stanovich, K. E., & West, R. F. (1998) · Thinking & Reasoning · doi:10.1080/135467898394139 · Cited by 249
“This assumption is supported by the empirically demonstrated connection between cognitive ability and the tendency to engage in analytic processing ( Ackerman & Heggestad, 1997; Cacioppo, Petty, Feinstein, & Jarvis, 1996).”
BackgroundBeyond g: Putting multiple intelligences theory to the test
Visser, B. A., Ashton, M. C., & Vernon, P. A. (2006) · Intelligence · doi:10.1016/j.intell.2006.02.004 · Cited by 243
Tett, R. P., & Christiansen, N. D. (2007) · Personnel Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.2007.00098.x · Cited by 264
Caprara, G. V., & Cervone, D. (2000) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511812767.006 · Cited by 244
Ployhart, R. E., Iddekinge, C. H. V., & MacKenzie, W. I. (2011) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.5465/amj.2011.60263097 · Cited by 250
Chen, G., Casper, W. J., & Cortina, J. M. (2001) · Human Performance · doi:10.1207/s15327043hup1403_1 · Cited by 245
“Values below the diagonal are from tasks of low complexity; values above the diagonal are from tasks of high complexity. bReported in Ackerman & Heggestad (1997). cReported in this study. dReported in Schmidt & Hunter (1998). eReported in Mount & Barrick (1995). fReported in Stajkovic & Luthans…”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialMeasured intelligence, achievement, openness to experience, and creativity
Harris, J. A. (2003) · Personality and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/s0191-8869(03)00161-2 · Cited by 246
“Based on a meta-analysis of over 100 studies, Ackerman and Heggestad (1997) reported that achievement was positively related to spatial ability, verbal fluency, and mathematical ability.”
BackgroundKaufman, S. B. (2013) · The Journal of Creative Behavior · doi:10.1002/jocb.33 · Cited by 229
“Although scores on traditional measures of intelligence correlate with openness to experience around .3 (Ackerman & Heggestad, 1997; DeYoung, 2011), psychometric intelligence and working memory are more strongly related to Intellect than Openness (DeYoung, Quilty, Peterson, & Gray, 2013; DeYoung et…”
BackgroundThe Nature and Power of Interests
Rounds, J., & Su, R. (2014) · Current Directions in Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/0963721414522812 · Cited by 229
“This is the primary reason why interests are predictive of human behaviors in particular environments, and why interest categories have been proposed as a framework for organizing and integrating individual-difference variables (Ackerman & Heggestad, 1997; Armstrong, Day, McVay, & Rounds, 2008).”
MethodIndividual Differences in Framing and Conjunction Effects
Stanovich, K. E., & West, R. F. (1998) · Thinking & Reasoning · doi:10.1080/135467898394094 · Cited by 235
“…need for cognition (see Smith & Levin, 1996), are more likely to deeply comprehend the problem (an assumption for which there is some evidence, see Ackerman & Heggestad, 1997; Baron, 1985; Carroll, 1993) then according to Slovic and Tversky’s (1974) understanding/acceptance principle, we might…”
BackgroundPredicting academic success in higher education: what’s more important than being smart?
Kappe, R. F., & der Flier, H. V. (2012) · European Journal of Psychology of Education · doi:10.1007/s10212-011-0099-9 · Cited by 224
“As might be expected, anxiety is also correlated with other predictors of academic achievement such as intelligence, r0−0.33 (Ackerman and Heggestad 1997), and neuroticism, r00.”
BackgroundInfluentialAndrei, F., Siegling, A. B., Aloe, A. M., Baldaro, B., & Petrides, K. V. (2016) · Journal of Personality Assessment · doi:10.1080/00223891.2015.1084630 · Cited by 235
“…EI (or cognitive-emotional ability) takes into consideration the psychometric distinction between measures of typical and maximal performance (e.g., Ackerman & Heggestad, 1997; Cronbach, 1949), with particular emphasis on its implications for the conceptualization of emotion-related individual…”
BackgroundBig Five and HEXACO Personality Traits, Proenvironmental Attitudes, and Behaviors: A Meta-Analysis
Soutter, A. R. B., Bates, T. C., & Mõttus, R. (2020) · Perspectives on Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/1745691620903019 · Cited by 261
Personality development from 12 to 18 years of age: changes in mean levels and structure of traits
Allïk, J., Laidra, K., Realo, A., & Pullmann, H. (2004) · European Journal of Personality · doi:10.1002/per.524 · Cited by 219
“Empirical studies, however, have typically found only a modest correlation between measures of personality and intelligence (Eysenck, 1994; Goff & Ackerman, 1992; Zeidner, 1995; for a metareview see Ackerman & Heggestad, 1997).”
BackgroundIntellectual Competence and the Intelligent Personality: A Third Way in Differential Psychology
Chamorro‐Premuzic, T., & Furnham, A. F. (2006) · Review of General Psychology · doi:10.1037/1089-2680.10.3.251 · Cited by 238
“…differences in personality, an increasing number of studies reported significant correlations between personality and intelligence measures (Ackerman & Heggestad, 1997; Austin et al., 2002; Austin, Hofer, Deary, & Eber, 2000; Brand, 1994; Chamorro-Premuzic, Moutafi, & Furnham, 2005;…”
BackgroundThe Cattell-Horn-Carroll Theory of Cognitive Abilities
Flanagan, D. P., & Dixon, S. G. (2014) · Encyclopedia of Special Education · doi:10.1002/9781118660584.ese0431 · Cited by 225
Stanovich, K. E., & West, R. F. (1999) · Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1006/cogp.1998.0700 · Cited by 228
“…reasoning is need for cognition—a dispositional construct encompassing the tendency toward thoughtful analysis, intellectual engagement, the desire for understanding, and the tendency toward thorough information processing (Ackerman & Heggestad, 1997; Cacioppo, Petty, Feinstein, & Jarvis, 1996).”
BackgroundLubinski, D., & Benbow, C. P. (2000) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037//0003-066x.55.1.137 · Cited by 297
“Perhaps we also come to understand how it should be nurtured. o4 51 Intellectual Development: TWA Informed by PPIK Theory Ackerman (1996; Ackerman & Heggestad, 1997) has proposedan intriguing modelof adult intellectual developmentthat is relevant to our discussion.”
BackgroundMethodLilienfeld, S. O., Watts, A. L., Smith, S. F., Berg, J. M., & Latzman, R. D. (2014) · Journal of Personality · doi:10.1111/jopy.12118 · Cited by 216
Openness, fluid intelligence, and crystallized intelligence: Toward an integrative model
Ziegler, M. D., Danay, E., Heene, M., Asendorpf, J. B., & Bühner, M. (2012) · Journal of Research in Personality · doi:10.1016/j.jrp.2012.01.002 · Cited by 230
“In particular, the relationship between Openness to Experience and intelligence has been the focus of much research (Ackerman & Heggestad, 1997; DeYoung, Peterson, & Higgins, 2005).”
BackgroundInfluentialDeterminants and validity of self-estimates of abilities and self-concept measures.
Ackerman, P. L., & Wolman, S. D. (2007) · Journal of Experimental Psychology Applied · doi:10.1037/1076-898x.13.2.57 · Cited by 208
Self-citationSternberg, R. J., & Kaufman, J. C. (1998) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.49.1.479 · Cited by 213
A possible model for understanding the personality‐intelligence interface
Chamorro‐Premuzic, T., & Furnham, A. F. (2004) · British Journal of Psychology · doi:10.1348/000712604773952458 · Cited by 222
Austin, E. J., Deary, I. J., Whiteman, M. C., Fowkes, F. G. R., Pedersen, N. L., Rabbitt, P., Bent, N., & McInnes, L. (2002) · Personality and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/s0191-8869(01)00129-5 · Cited by 215
“(Ackerman & Heggestad, 1997).”
Moutafi, J., Furnham, A. F., & Crump, J. (2003) · European Journal of Personality · doi:10.1002/per.471 · Cited by 217
“Ackerman and Heggestad (1997) conducted a meta-analysis, based on 135 separate studies, in order to investigate the relationship between cognitive ability (i.”
BackgroundMethodResultInfluentialAckerman, P. L. (2000) · The Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences · doi:10.1093/geronb/55.2.p69 · Cited by 206
“…traits, personality traits, and both knowledge and abilities, consistent with the PPIK theory (Ackerman, 1996) and the recent meta-analysis by Ackerman and Heggestad (1997), as follows: a. Artistic interests were predicted to have the highest correlations with knowledge in arts and…”
BackgroundMethodResultInfluentialSelf-citationSpatial ability: A neglected dimension in talent searches for intellectually precocious youth.
Webb, R. M., Lubinski, D., & Benbow, C. P. (2007) · Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-0663.99.2.397 · Cited by 215
“That is, following Ackerman (1996; Ackerman & Heggestad, 1997) or R. E. Snow (1994; R. E. Snow, Corno, & Jackson, 1996), respectively, what “trait clusters” or “aptitude complexes” are formed by the salient weights derived from these DFAs in the prediction of these criteria?”
BackgroundInfluentialPersonality and Creativity: The Dual Pathway to Creativity Model and a Research Agenda
Baas, M., Roskes, M., Sligte, D. J., Nijstad, B. A., & Dreu, C. K. W. D. (2013) · Social and Personality Psychology Compass · doi:10.1111/spc3.12062 · Cited by 218
Beier, M. E., & Ackerman, P. L. (2003) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.84.2.439 · Cited by 210
Self-citationOn the Relationship between Cognitive Ability and Risk Preference
Dohmen, T., Falk, A., Huffman, D., & Sunde, U. (2018) · The Journal of Economic Perspectives · doi:10.1257/jep.32.2.115 · Cited by 209
Why Liberals and Atheists Are More Intelligent
Satoshi Kanazawa, A. (2010) · Social Psychology Quarterly · doi:10.1177/0190272510361602 · Cited by 208
“GENERAL INTELLIGENCE AND OPENNESS TO EXPERIENCE Research in personality psychology has shown that one of the Five-Factor Model personality factors — openness to experience — is significantly positively correlated with intelligence (Ackerman and Heggestad 1997).”
BackgroundMüller, K. W., Beutel, M. E., Egloff, B., & Wölfling, K. (2013) · European Addiction Research · doi:10.1159/000355832 · Cited by 221
Big Five personality group differences across academic majors: A systematic review
Vedel, A. (2015) · Personality and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/j.paid.2015.12.011 · Cited by 197
Advances in personality psychology.
Hampson, S. E., Eliasz, A., & Raad, B. D. (2000) · University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology) · Cited by 197
When does anxiety help or hinder cognitive test performance? The role of working memory capacity
Owens, M., Stevenson, J., Hadwin, J. A., & Norgate, R. (2012) · British Journal of Psychology · doi:10.1111/bjop.12009 · Cited by 232
Brown, S. D., Lent, R. W., Telander, K. J., & Tramayne, S. R. (2010) · Journal of Vocational Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.jvb.2010.11.009 · Cited by 216
Innovations in Educational Psychology: Perspectives on Learning, Teaching, and Human Development
Preiss, D., & Sternberg, R. J. (2010) · Cited by 194
Chamorro‐Premuzic, T., Reimers, S. J., Hsu, A., & Ahmetoglu, G. (2008) · British Journal of Psychology · doi:10.1348/000712608x366867 · Cited by 191
“In line, Ackerman and Heggestad (1997) conducted an extensive metaanalysis of the correlations among personality traits and vocational interests, obtaining separated clusters or trait complexes for science/math on one hand, and intellectual/cultural on the other.”
BackgroundAssessing individual differences in knowledge: Knowledge, intelligence, and related traits.
Rolfhus, E. L., & Ackerman, P. L. (1999) · Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-0663.91.3.511 · Cited by 195
Self-citationRabbitt, P., Osman, P., Moore, B., & Stollery, B. T. (2001) · The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A · doi:10.1080/713756013 · Cited by 189
“Broadbent concludes that there are advantages for introverts, whereas a meta-analysis by Ackerman and Heggestad (1997) concludes advantages for extroverts.”
BackgroundPersonality and intelligence as predictors of statistics examination grades
Furnham, A. F., & Chamorro‐Premuzic, T. (2003) · Personality and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/j.paid.2003.10.016 · Cited by 209
“This may, at first, seem surprising given that Openness has often been found to be significantly correlated with intelligence ( Ackerman & Heggestad, 1997; Zeidner & Matthews, 2000).”
BackgroundKarwowski, M. (2016) · Creativity Research Journal · doi:10.1080/10400419.2016.1125254 · Cited by 188
“In some theories (i.e., Ackerman & Heggestad, 1997) it is argued that interests―which derive from self-concept―bring about investment of effort and lead to achievement.”
BackgroundThe complexity of developmental predictions from dual process models
Stanovich, K. E., West, R. F., & Toplak, M. E. (2011) · Developmental Review · doi:10.1016/j.dr.2011.07.003 · Cited by 202
“This third cognitive requirement—the tendency of the reflective mind to override the autonomous mind—is only mildly correlated with algorithmic-level cognitive capacity (Ackerman & Heggestad, 1997; Bates & Shieles, 2003; Cacioppo et al., 1996; Fleischhauer et al., 2010; Noftle & Robins, 2007).”
BackgroundRethinking expertise: a multifactorial gene–environment interaction model of expert performance.
Ullén, F., Hambrick, D. Z., & Mosing, M. A. (2016) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/bul0000033 · Cited by 182
“…vocational interests, personality, and abilities form different “trait complexes,” with different personality profiles of individuals active in different domains (social, scientific, clerical, cultural; Ackerman, 1996; Ackerman, Chamorro-Premuzic, & Furnham, 2011; Ackerman & Heggestad, 1997).”
BackgroundDeterminants of individual differences and gender differences in knowledge
Ackerman, P. L., Bowen, K. R., Beier, M. E., & Kanfer, R. (2001) · Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-0663.93.4.797 · Cited by 189
Self-citationRIASEC TYPES AND BIG FIVE TRAITS AS PREDICTORS OF EMPLOYMENT STATUS AND NATURE OF EMPLOYMENT
Fruyt, F. D., & Mervielde, I. (1999) · Personnel Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.1999.tb00177.x · Cited by 201
Nonsense, common sense, and science of expert performance: Talent and individual differences
Ackerman, P. L. (2013) · Intelligence · doi:10.1016/j.intell.2013.04.009 · Cited by 207
“In addition, through examination of the relations among ability traits, personality traits, and interests (Ackerman & Heggestad, 1997), the concept of “trait complexes” was introduced, to account for combinations of traits that appear to be facilitative or impeding factors in the development of…”
BackgroundSelf-citationIndividual differences in response to automation: The five factor model of personality.
Szalma, J. L., & Taylor, G. S. (2011) · Journal of Experimental Psychology Applied · doi:10.1037/a0024170 · Cited by 188
“Indeed, Openness correlates positively with an individual’s typical level of intellectual engagement in activities and with cognitive ability measures (Ackerman & Heggestad, 1997).”
BackgroundBig five personality traits and performance: A quantitative synthesis of 50+ meta‐analyses
Zell, E., & Lesick, T. L. (2021) · Journal of Personality · doi:10.1111/jopy.12683 · Cited by 262
“…settings for extraversion and agreeableness (Mount et al., 1998; Salgado & Táuriz, 2014) and intellectual or creative settings for openness (Ackerman & Heggestad, 1997; Puryear et al., 2017)— we anticipated that each would exert a smaller overall association with performance than…”
BackgroundWhy is Conscientiousness negatively correlated with intelligence?
Moutafi, J., Furnham, A., & Paltiel, L. (2004) · Personality and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/j.paid.2003.11.010 · Cited by 177
“…findings concerning the relationship between intelligence and personality are that intelligence is negatively correlated with Neuroticism (Ackerman & Heggestad, 1997; Furnham et al., 1998a; Moutafi et al., 2003; Zeidner & Matthews, 2000) and positively correlated with Openness to…”
BackgroundInfluentialPersonality development and organizational behavior.
Roberts, B. W. (2006) · Research in Organizational Behavior · doi:10.1016/s0191-3085(06)27001-1 · Cited by 177
“For example, Ackerman’s PPIK theory, integrates intelligence-asprocess (e.g., g), personality, interest, and intelligence-as-knowledge (Ackerman & Heggestad, 1997).”
Resource allocation and fluid intelligence: Insights from pupillometry
van der Meer, E. E., Beyer, R., Horn, J., Foth, M., Bornemann, B., Ries, J., Kramer, J., Warmüth, E., Heekeren, H. R., & Wartenburger, I. (2009) · Psychophysiology · doi:10.1111/j.1469-8986.2009.00884.x · Cited by 187
Chmielewski, M. S., Bagby, R. M., Markon, K. E., Ring, A. J., & Ryder, A. G. (2014) · Journal of Personality Disorders · doi:10.1521/pedi_2014_28_128 · Cited by 175
DeYoung, C. G., Cicchetti, D., Rogosch, F. A., Gray, J. R., Eastman, M., & Grigorenko, E. L. (2011) · Journal of Research in Personality · doi:10.1016/j.jrp.2011.04.002 · Cited by 180
“Despite the fact that Openness/Intellect is the one Big Five trait positively associated with intelligence (Ackerman & Heggestad, 1997; DeYoung, 2011), the exploratory tendency that Openness/ Intellect shares with Extraversion appears to be independent of intelligence (DeYoung et al., 2005, 2008).”
BackgroundNovice Programmers and Introductory Programming
Robins, A. V. (2019) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108654555.013 · Cited by 191
Big five personality factors, hardiness, and social judgment as predictors of leader performance
Bartone, P. T., Eid, J., Johnsen, B. H., Laberg, J. C., & Snook, S. A. (2009) · Leadership & Organization Development Journal · doi:10.1108/01437730910981908 · Cited by 174
“…performance: academic periods LODJ 30,6 510 While mental abilities factors have usually been treated as distinct from personality factors (Chamorro-Premuzic and Furnham, 2006), there is recent evidence that the two are more closely related than previously thought (Ackerman and Heggestad, 1997).”
BackgroundInvestigation of the construct of trait emotional intelligence in children
Mavroveli, S., Petrides, K. V., Shove, C., & Whitehead, A. (2008) · European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry · doi:10.1007/s00787-008-0696-6 · Cited by 172
“This study is based on the distinction between trait emotional intelligence (trait EI or ‘‘trait emotional self-efficacy’’) and ability EI (or ‘‘cognitive-emotional ability’’), proposed by Petrides and colleagues and reflecting the fundamental distinction in differential psychology between typical and maximal performa…”
BackgroundThe associations between personality, diet and body mass index in older people.
Mõttus, R., McNeill, G., Jia, X., Craig, L. C. A., Starr, J. M., & Deary, I. J. (2013) · Health Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0025537 · Cited by 171
An Empirical Examination of the Construct Validity of Two Alternative Self-Control Measures
Marcus, B. (2003) · Educational and Psychological Measurement · doi:10.1177/0013164403251329 · Cited by 170
“…to be largely independent of mental abilities, because most of the traits in Grasmick et al.’s scale are at best loosely related to intelligence (Ackerman & Heggestad, 1997) and, for behavioral measures, the typical intelligence decrement found for criminals appears to be mainly due to…”
BackgroundIddekinge, C. H. V., Putka, D. J., & Campbell, J. P. (2010) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0021193 · Cited by 184
Personality Testing and Industrial–Organizational Psychology: Reflections, Progress, and Prospects
Hough, L. M., & Oswald, F. L. (2008) · Industrial and Organizational Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.1754-9434.2008.00048.x · Cited by 181
“Personality variables correlate at low levels with cognitive ability (see Ackerman & Heggestad, 1997; McHenry et al., 1990; and Ones, Viswesvaran, & Reiss, 1996, for estimates of these correlations), affording the possibility for incremental validity.”
BackgroundIntroducing the construct curiosity for predicting job performance
Mussel, P. (2012) · Journal of Organizational Behavior · doi:10.1002/job.1809 · Cited by 181
“…intelligence, has been reported for openness to ideas (Moutafi et al., 2006), need for cognition (Cacioppo, Petty, Kao, & Rodriguez, 1986), and typical intellectual engagement (Ackerman & Heggestad, 1997), and similar hypothesis regarding the development of these constructs have been proposed.”
BackgroundFerrer, E., & McArdle, J. J. (2004) · Developmental Psychology · doi:10.1037/0012-1649.40.6.935 · Cited by 160
Construct validity and age sensitivity of prospective memory
Salthouse, T. A., Berish, D. E., & Siedlecki, K. L. (2004) · Memory & Cognition · doi:10.3758/bf03196887 · Cited by 162
“Relations between cognitive ability and the personality characteristic of openness have been reported before (e.g., Ackerman & Heggestad, 1997; Ashton, Lee, & Vernon, 2000) and appear to reflect a tendency for higher functioning individuals to be more intellectually curious and flexible.”
BackgroundAllen, J., & Robbins, S. (2010) · Journal of Counseling Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0017267 · Cited by 166
“Other work might suggest reciprocal development of vocational interests and motivation (e.g., interests affect motivation to attempt a task, and unsuccessful attempts may decrease interest in the task; Ackerman & Heggestad, 1997).”
BackgroundNg, T. W. H., & Feldman, D. C. (2009) · Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology · doi:10.1348/096317909x414584 · Cited by 184
Competency and Individual Performance: Modelling the World of Work
Kurz, R. H., & Bartram, D. (2002) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9780470696736.ch10 · Cited by 167
Steinmayr, R., Weidinger, A. F., & Wigfield, A. (2018) · Contemporary Educational Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.cedpsych.2018.02.004 · Cited by 163
Stanovich, K. E. (2012) · The Oxford Handbook of Thinking and Reasoning · doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199734689.013.0022 · Cited by 169
“Many diff erent studies involving thousands of subjects (e.g., Ackerman & Heggestad, 1997; Austin & Deary, 2002; Baron, 1982; Bates & Shieles, 2003; Cacioppo et al., 1996; Eysenck, 1994; Goff & Ackerman, 1992; Kanazawa, 2004; Kokis et al., 2002; Zeidner & Matthews, 2000) have indicated that…”
BackgroundPerceived fit with an academic environment: Attitudinal and behavioral outcomes
Schmitt, N., Oswald, F. L., Friede, A., Imus, A. L., & Merritt, S. M. (2007) · Journal of Vocational Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.jvb.2007.10.007 · Cited by 162
“Of the six vocational interests, Realistic and Investigative interests show the highest positive correlations with measures of cognitive ability ( Ackerman & Heggestad, 1997 ), which suggests that both would lead to attract individuals to the college setting; however our sense is that with regard to fit in college, th…”
BackgroundNewman, D. A., & Lyon, J. S. (2009) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0013472 · Cited by 171
“We believed that potential applicants with this trait would possess higher creativity (Kuncel, Hezlett, & Ones, 2004) and higher openness to experience (Ackerman & Heggestad, 1997) and thus be more attracted to an innovative company.”
BackgroundA model for personality at three levels
Revelle, W., & Condon, D. M. (2015) · Journal of Research in Personality · doi:10.1016/j.jrp.2014.12.006 · Cited by 166
“Exceptions to this general rule include Ackerman (1997), Ackerman and Heggestad (1997), Deary, Whiteman, Starr, Whalley, and Fox (2004), Deary (2008), Deary et al. (2013), DeYoung (2014), Ferriman, Lubinski, and Benbow (2009), Gottfredson (1997), Lubinski and Benbow (2000), Lubinski, Webb,…”
BackgroundCafri, G., Kromrey, J. D., & Brannick, M. T. (2010) · Multivariate Behavioral Research · doi:10.1080/00273171003680187 · Cited by 156
Assessing adult leisure activities: An extension of a self-report activity questionnaire.
Jopp, D. S., & Hertzog, C. K. (2010) · Psychological Assessment · doi:10.1037/a0017662 · Cited by 157
“Cognitively demanding activities such as technology use were most strongly related to cognitive functioning (Ackerman & Heggestad, 1997; Hultsch et al., 1999).”
BackgroundStoll, G., Rieger, S., Lüdtke, O., Nagengast, B., Trautwein, U., & Roberts, B. W. (2017) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/pspp0000117 · Cited by 97
“…Day, McVay, & Rounds, 2008), but associations (Realistic/Investigative—quantitative, Artistic—verbal, Conventional—clerical/perceptual speed) are modest and vary by gender, while some interests show overall weak associations with abilities (Ackerman & Heggestad, 1997; Pä ler & Hell, 2012).”
On the failure of cognitive ability to predict myside and one-sided thinking biases
Stanovich, K. E., & West, R. F. (2008) · Thinking & Reasoning · doi:10.1080/13546780701679764 · Cited by 168
“Psychometricians have long distinguished typical performance situations from optimal (sometimes termed maximal) performance situations (Ackerman, 1994, 1996; Ackerman & Heggestad, 1997; Ackerman & Kanfer, 2004; Cronbach, 1949; Matthews, Zeidner, & Roberts, 2002).”
BackgroundOnraet, E., Hiel, A. V., Dhont, K., Hodson, G., Schittekatte, M., & Pauw, S. S. W. D. (2015) · European Journal of Personality · doi:10.1002/per.2027 · Cited by 156
Advances in vocational psychology theory and research.
Swanson, J. L., & Gore, P. A. (2000) · Cited by 152
Relationships between ability and personality: Three hypotheses tested
Austin, E. J., Deary, I. J., & Gibson, G. J. (1997) · Intelligence · doi:10.1016/s0160-2896(97)90007-6 · Cited by 151
Personality stability from age 14 to age 77 years.
Harris, M. A., Brett, C. E., Johnson, W., & Deary, I. J. (2016) · Psychology and Aging · doi:10.1037/pag0000133 · Cited by 175
“…such as Conscientiousness and Openness, are associated with higher cognitive performance, whereas traits such as Neuroticism and Psychoticism are negatively associated with intelligence (Ackerman & Heggestad, 1997; Chamorro-Premuzic, Furnham, & Ackerman, 2006; Schaie, Willis, & Caskie, 2004).”
BackgroundPersonality and school performance: Incremental validity of self- and peer-ratings over intelligence
Bratko, D., Chamorro‐Premuzic, T., & Saks, Z. (2006) · Personality and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/j.paid.2005.12.015 · Cited by 160
“…failure to account for individual differences in ability may be justified by the fact that, Openness aside, there is only a modest overlap between personality and intelligence measures (Ackerman & Heggestad, 1997; Chamorro-Premuzic & Furnham, 2005; Eysenck, 1994; McCrae & Costa, 1997a).”
BackgroundA meta-analytic review and future research agenda of charismatic leadership
Banks, G. C., Engemann, K. N., Williams, C., Gooty, J., McCauley, K. D., & Medaugh, M. R. (2017) · The Leadership Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2016.12.003 · Cited by 187
Creative Self-Beliefs: Their Nature, Development, and Correlates
Karwowski, M., & Barbot, B. (2016) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139941969.016 · Cited by 176
Personnel Selection and Employee Performance
Schmitt, N., Cortina, J. M., Ingerick, M. J., & Wiechmann, D. (2003) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/0471264385.wei1205 · Cited by 157
Inductive reasoning: The promise of big data
McAbee, S. T., Landis, R. S., & Burke, M. I. (2016) · Human Resource Management Review · doi:10.1016/j.hrmr.2016.08.005 · Cited by 166
Extending the nomological network of computational thinking with non-cognitive factors
Román-González, ., Pérez-González, J. C., Moreno-León, J., & Robles, G. (2017) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2017.09.030 · Cited by 158
Personality–cognition relations across adulthood.
Soubelet, A., & Salthouse, T. A. (2010) · Developmental Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0021816 · Cited by 146
Educational Aspirations: The Contribution of Personality, Self-Efficacy, and Interests
Rottinghaus, P. J., Lindley, L. D., Green, M. A., & Borgen, F. H. (2002) · Journal of Vocational Behavior · doi:10.1006/jvbe.2001.1843 · Cited by 146
Metadata
- Authors
- Ackerman, P. L., & Heggestad, E. D.
- Affiliations
- University of Minnesota (US)
- Venue
- Psychological Bulletin
- Published
- 1997-03
- Volume
- 121
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 219-245
- ISSN
- 0033-2909 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-1455
- OpenAlex
- W2093371949
- Semantic Scholar
- de9d16d02fc6cd75679a94f29181ba274bc8e3c5
- Cited by
- 1,829
- References
- 241
- Citations by year
- 2026: 39 · 2025: 37 · 2024: 48 · 2023: 79 · 2022: 66 · 2021: 60 · 2020: 118 · 2019: 110 · 2018: 79 · 2017: 83 · 2016: 92 · 2015: 79 · 2014: 84 · 2013: 96 · 2012: 93
- FWCI
- 27.18
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Psychological Bulletin (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Abilities and Testing
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Traits and Psychology
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Psychological Testing and Assessment
- Keywords
- intelligence, personality, career interest, social characteristics
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Aspirations, Psychological, Career Choice, Child, Female, Humans, Intelligence, Male, Motivation, Personality, Personality Development
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review