Cited by 394Optical Imaging and Spectroscopy TechniquesAdvanced Fluorescence Microscopy TechniquesSpectroscopy Techniques in Biomedical and Chemical Research

Perfecting and extending the near-infrared imaging window

Open access
Feng, Zhe, Tang, Tao, Wu, Tianxiang, Yu, Xiaoming, Zhang, Yuhuang, Wang, Meng, Zheng, Junyan, Ying, Yanyun +7 more·2021·Light: Science & Applications

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

In vivo fluorescence imaging in the second near-infrared window (NIR-II) has been considered as a promising technique for visualizing mammals. However, the definition of the NIR-II region and the mechanism accounting for the excellent performance still need to be perfected. Herein, we simulate the photon propagation in the NIR region (to 2340 nm), confirm the positive contribution of moderate light absorption by water in intravital imaging and perfect the NIR-II window as 900–1880 nm, where 1400–1500 and 1700–1880 nm are defined as NIR-IIx and NIR-IIc regions, respectively. Moreover, 2080–2340 nm is newly proposed as the third near-infrared (NIR-III) window, which is believed to provide the best imaging quality. The wide-field fluorescence microscopy in the brain is performed around the NIR-IIx region, with excellent optical sectioning strength and the largest imaging depth of intravital NIR-II fluorescence microscopy to date. We also propose 1400 nm long-pass detection in off-peak NIR-II imaging whose performance exceeds that of NIR-IIb imaging, using bright fluorophores with short emission wavelength.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41377-021-00628-0

Cites

58 of 58 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • NIR-II light experiences significantly reduced absorption and scattering upon interaction with biological tissues.

    “Crucially, upon interaction with biological tissues, NIR-II light experiences significantly reduced absorption and scattering38.”

    From Organic small-molecule NIR-II fluorophores for tumor phototheranostics (2026) · cites this paper as [38]

    The Introduction and Discussion describe reduced photon scattering at NIR-II wavelengths. But the Results and Discussion show that absorption varies across the window, including substantial water-absorption peaks; they do not support a general claim that NIR-II light also experiences significantly reduced absorption in biological tissue. Page numbers were not available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • NIR-II fluorophores have deep-tissue penetration, reduced tissue autofluorescence, and low phototoxicity.

    “Near-infrared II (NIR-II) fluorophores possess transformative potential for biomedical applications, owing to their deep-tissue penetration, reduced tissue autofluorescence, and low phototoxicity.”

    From Organic small-molecule NIR-II fluorophores for tumor phototheranostics (2026) · cites this paper as [38]

    The Introduction and Results section on large-depth tomography describe NIR-II imaging of deep tissue, including brain imaging to approximately 800 μm. The Introduction identifies tissue autofluorescence as background but does not say NIR-II reduces it. The Discussion warns that excitation light can cause photothermal damage, so the copy does not establish low phototoxicity as a general property of NIR-II fluorophores. Page numbers were not available in the indexed passages. (LLM, conf=0.87)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Feng, Z., Tang, T., Wu, T., Yu, X., Zhang, Y., Wang, M., Zheng, J., Ying, Y., Chen, S., Zhou, J., Fan, X., Zhang, D., Li, S., Zhang, M., & Qian, J.
Affiliations
  • State Key Laboratory of Modern Optical Instruments (CN)
  • Wuhan University of Technology (CN)
  • Women's Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University (CN)
  • Soochow University (CN)
Corresponding author
  • Zhang, Mingxi
  • Qian, Jun
Venue
Light: Science & Applications
Published
2021-09-24
Volume
10
Issue
1
Pages
197-197
ISSN
2047-7538 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3198921063
Cited by
394
References
58
Citations by year
2026: 79 · 2025: 110 · 2024: 91 · 2023: 55 · 2022: 57 · 2021: 2
FWCI
27.05
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Light Science & Applications (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (82001874, 21974104)
  • Natural Science Foundation of Zhejiang Province (LR17F050001)
  • Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Optical Imaging and Spectroscopy Techniques
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Biophysics › Advanced Fluorescence Microscopy Techniques
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Biophysics › Spectroscopy Techniques in Biomedical and Chemical Research
Keywords
NIR-II fluorescence imaging, water absorption, intravital imaging, wide-field fluorescence microscopy, neuroimaging, optical sectioning, imaging depth

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review