The DOI matches its Crossref record; 109 of the 112 references it cites were found in a registry or an index, and 1 are not checked yet; 3 of the 132 sources its claims cite were checked for support.
The power and pitfalls of AlphaFold2 for structure prediction beyond rigid globular proteins
Open accessAbstract
Artificial intelligence-driven advances in protein structure prediction in recent years have raised the question: has the protein structure-prediction problem been solved? Here, with a focus on nonglobular proteins, we highlight the many strengths and potential weaknesses of DeepMind's AlphaFold2 in the context of its biological and therapeutic applications. We summarize the subtleties associated with evaluation of AlphaFold2 model quality and reliability using the predicted local distance difference test (pLDDT) and predicted aligned error (PAE) values. We highlight various classes of proteins that AlphaFold2 can be applied to and the caveats involved. Concrete examples of how AlphaFold2 models can be integrated with experimental data in the form of small-angle X-ray scattering (SAXS), solution NMR, cryo-electron microscopy (cryo-EM) and X-ray diffraction are discussed. Finally, we highlight the need to move beyond structure prediction of rigid, static structural snapshots toward conformational ensembles and alternate biologically relevant states. The overarching theme is that careful consideration is due when using AlphaFold2-generated models to generate testable hypotheses and structural models, rather than treating predicted models as de facto ground truth structures.
Verified 2026-10-07 · 1 reference not checked yet
Overview
AI snapshot
Written from the paper’s full text.
TL;DR
This review examines AlphaFold2’s strengths and failure modes for proteins beyond rigid globular folds, stressing that confidence scores do not guarantee agreement with experimental structures. It argues AF2 is best used as a hypothesis-generating complement to experimental data rather than as definitive structural truth.
Key findings
- AF2 has broad coverage—modeling 98.5% of the human proteome, with over 200 million precomputed predictions in the AlphaFold Protein Structure Database—but accuracy varies by target class.
- pLDDT and PAE are useful but imperfect: low pLDDT (<70) or high PAE (>5 Å) signal caution, yet high-confidence models can still deviate from experiments. On average, AF2 predicts about 50% of residues with high confidence, and one cited estimate suggests ~10% of high-confidence residues differ from native backbone by more than 2 Å.
- Non-globular and dynamic systems are especially challenging: peptides were excluded from training, IDPs/IDRs are often conformational ensembles, membrane proteins are underrepresented in the PDB (<3%), and AF2 struggles with alternative conformations, ligand/cofactor effects, and domain placement. Heterodimeric complex success rates were reported at 51% and 63% in two benchmarks, with antibody complexes particularly difficult.
- Integrating AF2 with SAXS, NMR, X-ray, and cryo-EM can improve models; AF-guided molecular replacement solved 187 of 215 structures in one benchmark, though cryo-EM maps worse than 6 Å are not recommended for fitting.
Methods
- Narrative review/perspective, not a primary research study; no new experimental data or systematic meta-analysis are presented.
- Synthesizes published benchmarks, case examples, and prior literature on AF2 workflow, pLDDT/PAE interpretation, protein classes, experimental integration, and conformational ensembles.
- Uses selected examples—such as OSBP1, insulin, ChRmine, SecA, and beta-endorphin amyloid—to illustrate strengths and failure modes.
Limitations
- Stated AF2 limitations include no training or validation for mutation effects, training bias toward soluble/PDB folds, peptide exclusion, membrane-protein underrepresentation, poor handling of IDPs/IDRs and alternative conformations, and cases where high pLDDT/PAE still mislead; inter-domain PAE accuracy is less benchmarked.
- Evident from the text, not stated by the authors: as a narrative review, the selection of examples and benchmarks is not systematic, and the conclusions depend on the cited literature rather than new quantitative assessment.
Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
77 Not checked yet · 15 Own interpretation · 8 No basis given · 4 Own result · 1 Supported · 1 Partly supported · accuracy not yet measured
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“Several groups have reported cases of AF2 models with low PAE values (< 5 Å) that deviated from experimental data62,63”
§ The power and pitfalls of AlphaFold2 for structure prediction beyond rigid globular proteins > Evaluation metrics and model reliability
What the sources say
- Partly supportedcites [62] McCafferty, C. L., Pennington, E. L., Papoulas, O., Taylor, D. W. & Marcotte, E. M. Does AlphaFold2 model proteins’ intracellular conformations? An experimental test using cross-linking mass spectrometry of endogenous ciliary proteins. Commun. Biol. 6, 421 (2023). sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Results and discussion report AF2 models that violated experimental cross-link constraints despite high pLDDT scores, supporting the point that confident predictions can disagree with experimental data. But pLDDT is not PAE: the paper does not identify a violating model with PAE <5 Å, and it reports no violations in the PAE range 0–3.5. Its findings therefore do not establish the cited threshold. (LLM, conf=0.84)
- Partly supportedcites [63] Motmaen, A. et al. Peptide-binding specificity prediction using fine-tuned protein structure prediction networks. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 120, e2216697120 (2023). sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Results (page unavailable) report that PAE only partly distinguished binding from non-binding peptides and that AlphaFold tended to dock non-binding peptides in the MHC binding groove. This supports the broader point that AlphaFold models can conflict with experimental binding evidence, but the paper does not identify models with PAE <5 Å or report those models deviating from experimental structures. (LLM, conf=0.76)
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Partly supported
Every source the paper cites for this claim was checked and supports it.
In the paper
“Moreover, in the absence of NMR resonance assignments, AF2 models can be used as structural templates towards automated assignment90.”
§ The power and pitfalls of AlphaFold2 for structure prediction beyond rigid globular proteins > Integration of AF2 models with experimental data
What the sources say
- Supportedcites [90] Klukowski, P., Riek, R. & Güntert, P. Time-optimized protein NMR assignment with an integrative deep learning approach using AlphaFold and chemical shift prediction. Sci. Adv. 9, eadi9323 (2023). source
The Results section reports automated NMR assignment using AlphaFold structures as input, including structure-based backbone amide assignment. It recommends predicted structures for automated chemical shift assignment with ARTINA; prior resonance assignments are not required as input. (LLM, conf=0.93)
plainconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Supported
In the paper
“modeling of 98.5% of the human proteome5”
§ The power and pitfalls of AlphaFold2 for structure prediction beyond rigid globular proteins > Main
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [5] Tunyasuvunakool, K. et al. Highly accurate protein structure prediction for the human proteome. Nature 596, 590–596 (2021). source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“are the best and most accurate answer to the structure prediction problem to date”
§ The power and pitfalls of AlphaFold2 for structure prediction beyond rigid globular proteins > Main
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [1] Jumper, J. et al. Highly accurate protein structure prediction with AlphaFold. Nature 596, 583–589 (2021). source
- Not checked yetcites [17] Akdel, M. et al. A structural biology community assessment of AlphaFold2 applications. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 29, 1056–1067 (2022). source
- Not checked yetcites [18] Baek, M. et al. Accurate prediction of protein structures and interactions using a three-track neural network. Science 373, 871–876 (2021). source
- Not checked yetcites [19] Lin, Z. et al. Evolutionary-scale prediction of atomic-level protein structure with a language model. Science 379, 1123–1130 (2023). source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“whether the modeled structure resembles the apo or holo form of the protein is not immediately clear from analysis of pLDDT scores or PAE graphs32”
§ The power and pitfalls of AlphaFold2 for structure prediction beyond rigid globular proteins > A critical evaluation of AlphaFold2’s applications
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [32] Saldaño, T. et al. Impact of protein conformational diversity on AlphaFold predictions. Bioinformatics 38, 2742–2748 (2022). source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Benchmarking AF2 against membrane proteins represents a challenge since the membrane environment, which includes lipids and other proteins, is not directly considered by current versions of AlphaFold38”
§ The power and pitfalls of AlphaFold2 for structure prediction beyond rigid globular proteins > A critical evaluation of AlphaFold2’s applications
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [38] Hegedűs, T., Geisler, M., Lukács, G. L. & Farkas, B. Ins and outs of AlphaFold2 transmembrane protein structure predictions. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 79, 73 (2022). source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“NMR structural ensembles offer a unique validation metric to assess the accuracy of predicted AlphaFold2 models since AlphaFold2 was trained on a subset of the PDB that excluded NMR data1,27–30”
§ The power and pitfalls of AlphaFold2 for structure prediction beyond rigid globular proteins > A critical evaluation of AlphaFold2’s applications
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [1] Jumper, J. et al. Highly accurate protein structure prediction with AlphaFold. Nature 596, 583–589 (2021). source
- Not checked yetcites [27] Alderson, T. R., Pritišanac, I., Kolarić, Đ., Moses, A. M. & Forman-Kay, J. D. Systematic identification of conditionally folded intrinsically disordered regions by AlphaFold2. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 120, e2304302120 (2023). source
- Not checked yetcites [28] Fowler, N. J. & Williamson, M. P. The accuracy of protein structures in solution determined by AlphaFold and NMR. Structure 30, 925–933 (2022). source
- Not checked yetcites [29] Zweckstetter, M. NMR hawk‐eyed view of AlphaFold2 structures. Protein Sci. 30, 2333–2337 (2021). source
- Not checked yetcites [30] Tejero, R., Huang, Y. J., Ramelot, T. A. & Montelione, G. T. AlphaFold models of small proteins rival the accuracy of solution NMR Structures. Front. Mol. Biosci. 9, 877000 (2022). source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Azzaz et al have shown the difficulty in AF2 in modeling membrane proteins due to “epigenetic” factors (i.e., lipid environment, co-receptor induced structural changes, post-translational modifications) that control protein structure beyond the amino acid sequence40”
§ The power and pitfalls of AlphaFold2 for structure prediction beyond rigid globular proteins > A critical evaluation of AlphaFold2’s applications
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [40] Azzaz, F., Yahi, N., Chahinian, H. & Fantini, J. The epigenetic dimension of protein structure is an intrinsic weakness of the AlphaFold program. Biomolecules 12, 1527 (2022). source
boosteddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“deviations of AF2 models from experimental structures also occur when co-factors, prosthetic groups, or ligands induce structural changes, either locally or allosterically”
§ The power and pitfalls of AlphaFold2 for structure prediction beyond rigid globular proteins > A critical evaluation of AlphaFold2’s applications
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Fowler et al revealed that NMR ensembles can be more accurate than static AF2 models for dynamic proteins28”
§ The power and pitfalls of AlphaFold2 for structure prediction beyond rigid globular proteins > A critical evaluation of AlphaFold2’s applications
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [28] Fowler, N. J. & Williamson, M. P. The accuracy of protein structures in solution determined by AlphaFold and NMR. Structure 30, 925–933 (2022). source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- It may state two separate claims as one. 28
- The quote only partly states this claim. 1
- Probably not a substantial claim. 15
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“the PH, CC, and ORD domain structure are assigned very high to high predicted confidence, while the FFAT domain is predicted with very low confidence”
§ The power and pitfalls of AlphaFold2 for structure prediction beyond rigid globular proteins > AlphaFold2’s AI-driven revolution
plainSingle case- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one. The quote only partly states this claim.
In the paper
“current versions of AF2 do not use energy functions that seek to identify native-like protein conformations, unlike its competitor Rosetta13”
§ The power and pitfalls of AlphaFold2 for structure prediction beyond rigid globular proteins > Main
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [13] Alford, R. F. et al. The Rosetta all-atom energy function for macromolecular modeling and design. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 13, 3031–3048 (2017). source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“allow users to run a modified AF2 protocol on open access servers in minutes”
§ The power and pitfalls of AlphaFold2 for structure prediction beyond rigid globular proteins > Main
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [8] Mirdita, M. et al. ColabFold: making protein folding accessible to all. Nat. Methods 19, 679–682 (2022). source
- Not checked yetcites [9] Ahdritz, G. et al. OpenFold: retraining AlphaFold2 yields new insights into its learning mechanisms and capacity for generalization. Nat. Methods https://doi.org/10.1038/s41592-024-02272-z (2024). source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“requires significant computational resources to run the software locally (up to 3 terabytes of disk space and a modern NVIDIA GPUs with gigabytes of memory)”
§ The power and pitfalls of AlphaFold2 for structure prediction beyond rigid globular proteins > Main
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“houses over 200 million pre-run AF2 predictions”
§ The power and pitfalls of AlphaFold2 for structure prediction beyond rigid globular proteins > Main
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [6] Varadi, M. et al. AlphaFold Protein Structure Database: massively expanding the structural coverage of protein-sequence space with high-accuracy models. Nucleic Acids Res. 50, D439–D444 (2022). source
- Not checked yetcites [7] Varadi, M. et al. AlphaFold Protein Structure Database in 2024: providing structure coverage for over 214 million protein sequences. Nucleic Acids Res. 52, D368–D375 (2024). source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“enables accurate prediction of three-dimensional protein structures from only the target amino acid sequence”
§ The power and pitfalls of AlphaFold2 for structure prediction beyond rigid globular proteins > Main
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [1] Jumper, J. et al. Highly accurate protein structure prediction with AlphaFold. Nature 596, 583–589 (2021). source
- Not checked yetcites [2] Bertoline, L. M. F., Lima, A. N., Krieger, J. E. & Teixeira, S. K. Before and after AlphaFold2: an overview of protein structure prediction. Front. Bioinform. 3, 1120370 (2023).
- Not checked yetcites [3] Perrakis, A. & Sixma, T. K. AI revolutions in biology. EMBO Rep. 22, e54046 (2021). source
- Not checked yetcites [4] Bouatta, N., Sorger, P. & AlQuraishi, M. Protein structure prediction by AlphaFold2: are attention and symmetries all you need? Acta Crystallogr. D 77, 982–991 (2021). source
plainconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Tsaban et al showed that AF2 can be adapted to accurately model peptide/protein complexes irrespective of peptide length, although the results seemed biased towards helical structures and peptides that do not undergo large structural rearrangements upon binding24”
§ The power and pitfalls of AlphaFold2 for structure prediction beyond rigid globular proteins > A critical evaluation of AlphaFold2’s applications
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [24] Tsaban, T. et al. Harnessing protein folding neural networks for peptide–protein docking. Nat. Commun. 13, 176 (2022). source
hedgedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“the predicted Local Distance Difference Test (pLDDT) score, which ranges from 0 to 100 with higher values assigned higher confidence in the model”
§ The power and pitfalls of AlphaFold2 for structure prediction beyond rigid globular proteins > AlphaFold2’s AI-driven revolution
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [1] Jumper, J. et al. Highly accurate protein structure prediction with AlphaFold. Nature 596, 583–589 (2021). source
- Not checked yetcites [22] Mariani, V., Biasini, M., Barbato, A. & Schwede, T. lDDT: a local superposition-free score for comparing protein structures and models using distance difference tests. Bioinformatics 29, 2722–2728 (2013). source
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“For cases i and iv, low confidence in pLDDT scores and PAE graphs alerts users to interpret structures with caution, which is not immediately clear in cases ii and iii.”
§ The power and pitfalls of AlphaFold2 for structure prediction beyond rigid globular proteins > A critical evaluation of AlphaFold2’s applications
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“membrane proteins represent less than 3% of total structures in the PDB15, meaning that the training set used by AF2 was highly biased towards soluble proteins39”
§ The power and pitfalls of AlphaFold2 for structure prediction beyond rigid globular proteins > A critical evaluation of AlphaFold2’s applications
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [15] Laurents, D. V. AlphaFold 2 and NMR spectroscopy: partners to understand protein structure, dynamics and function. Front. Mol. Biosci. 9, 906437 (2022). source
- Not checked yetcites [39] Topitsch, A., Schwede, T. & Pereira, J. Outer membrane β-barrel structure prediction through the lens of AlphaFold2. Proteins 92, 3–14 (2024). source
boosteddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“the best ranked AF2 models (selected on the basis of high pLDDT score) often did not exhibit the lowest Cα root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) relative to the experimental structure, suggesting the pLDDT metric used by AF2 to assess protein models is not optimal for classification of peptide conformations25”
§ The power and pitfalls of AlphaFold2 for structure prediction beyond rigid globular proteins > A critical evaluation of AlphaFold2’s applications
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [25] McDonald, E. F., Jones, T., Plate, L., Meiler, J. & Gulsevin, A. Benchmarking AlphaFold2 on peptide structure prediction. Structure 31, 111–119 (2023). source
hedged- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“AF2 predicts the structure of individual domains well but deviates in placement of domains relative to each other (Fig. 2e)”
§ The power and pitfalls of AlphaFold2 for structure prediction beyond rigid globular proteins > A critical evaluation of AlphaFold2’s applications
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Peptide structure prediction poses additional challenges given that the benchmark set used to train AF2 excluded peptides, the difficulty in generating robust MSAs for short sequences, and observations that many peptides exist in solution as conformational ensembles rather than a single static conformation1,24,25”
§ The power and pitfalls of AlphaFold2 for structure prediction beyond rigid globular proteins > A critical evaluation of AlphaFold2’s applications
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [1] Jumper, J. et al. Highly accurate protein structure prediction with AlphaFold. Nature 596, 583–589 (2021). source
- Not checked yetcites [24] Tsaban, T. et al. Harnessing protein folding neural networks for peptide–protein docking. Nat. Commun. 13, 176 (2022). source
- Not checked yetcites [25] McDonald, E. F., Jones, T., Plate, L., Meiler, J. & Gulsevin, A. Benchmarking AlphaFold2 on peptide structure prediction. Structure 31, 111–119 (2023). source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Several groups have suggested that the default AF2 pipeline has difficulty in modeling alternative conformations45”
§ The power and pitfalls of AlphaFold2 for structure prediction beyond rigid globular proteins > A critical evaluation of AlphaFold2’s applications
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [45] Lane, T. J. Protein structure prediction has reached the single-structure frontier. Nat. Methods 20, 170–173 (2023). source
hedged- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
In the paper
“AF2 also generates a Predicted Aligned Error (PAE) matrix, which evaluates the relative orientation and position of different parts (i.e., domains) of the model6”
§ The power and pitfalls of AlphaFold2 for structure prediction beyond rigid globular proteins > AlphaFold2’s AI-driven revolution
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [6] Varadi, M. et al. AlphaFold Protein Structure Database: massively expanding the structural coverage of protein-sequence space with high-accuracy models. Nucleic Acids Res. 50, D439–D444 (2022). source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“AF2 performs poorly for targets embedded in membrane thickness outside the 15–35 Å range as well as targets with novel features not commonly present in the PDB”
§ The power and pitfalls of AlphaFold2 for structure prediction beyond rigid globular proteins > A critical evaluation of AlphaFold2’s applications
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [38] Hegedűs, T., Geisler, M., Lukács, G. L. & Farkas, B. Ins and outs of AlphaFold2 transmembrane protein structure predictions. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 79, 73 (2022). source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“while the AF2 model of the channelrhodopsin ChRmine captures its overall fold, the modeled N-terminal region and extracellular loops deviate from its experimental high-resolution cryogenic electron microscopy (cryo-EM) structure (Fig. 2f), likely due to ChRmine’s unique covalent Schiff base feature41”
§ The power and pitfalls of AlphaFold2 for structure prediction beyond rigid globular proteins > A critical evaluation of AlphaFold2’s applications
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [41] Kishi, K. E. et al. Structural basis for channel conduction in the pump-like channelrhodopsin ChRmine. Cell 185, 672–689 (2022). source
hedgedconditionalSingle case- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“AF2 models with trans-membrane region lengths corresponding to non-physiological membrane thickness values can exhibit very high pLDDT scores (high model confidence), suggesting pLDDT scores alone are not sufficient to select native membrane protein conformations”
§ The power and pitfalls of AlphaFold2 for structure prediction beyond rigid globular proteins > A critical evaluation of AlphaFold2’s applications
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [38] Hegedűs, T., Geisler, M., Lukács, G. L. & Farkas, B. Ins and outs of AlphaFold2 transmembrane protein structure predictions. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 79, 73 (2022). source
hedgedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“the NMR structure of Ca2+ bound polycystin 2 deviates from the AF2 model, potentially due to conformational changes upon calcium binding (Fig. 2c)”
§ The power and pitfalls of AlphaFold2 for structure prediction beyond rigid globular proteins > A critical evaluation of AlphaFold2’s applications
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Hegedűs et al benchmarked several membrane proteins not included in the original AF2 training set and concluded that on average AF2 predicts transmembrane proteins as well as soluble proteins38”
§ The power and pitfalls of AlphaFold2 for structure prediction beyond rigid globular proteins > A critical evaluation of AlphaFold2’s applications
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [38] Hegedűs, T., Geisler, M., Lukács, G. L. & Farkas, B. Ins and outs of AlphaFold2 transmembrane protein structure predictions. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 79, 73 (2022). source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“it is important to remember that the PAE values are only confidence estimates. Furthermore, the accuracy of PAE graphs for inter-domain prediction has not been as extensively benchmarked as for intra-domain contacts36”
§ The power and pitfalls of AlphaFold2 for structure prediction beyond rigid globular proteins > A critical evaluation of AlphaFold2’s applications
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [36] David, A., Islam, S., Tankhilevich, E. & Sternberg, M. J. E. The AlphaFold database of protein structures: a biologist’s guide. J. Mol. Biol. 434, 167336 (2022). source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“the AF2 model of insulin deviates significantly from its experimental NMR structure (Fig. 2b), potentially due to the inability of AF2 to orient cysteine pairs for disulfide bond formation31”
§ The power and pitfalls of AlphaFold2 for structure prediction beyond rigid globular proteins > A critical evaluation of AlphaFold2’s applications
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [31] Thornton, J. M., Laskowski, R. A. & Borkakoti, N. AlphaFold heralds a data-driven revolution in biology and medicine. Nat. Med. 27, 1666–1669 (2021). source
hedgedconditionalSingle case- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“high pLDDT or low PAE metrics, indicating high confidence in the prediction, do not promise agreement with native protein conformations, but instead estimate a likelihood for local and global coordinate positions and/or orientations”
§ The power and pitfalls of AlphaFold2 for structure prediction beyond rigid globular proteins > AlphaFold2’s AI-driven revolution
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“These deviations can be broadly categorized into cases with i) inaccurate secondary, tertiary, and/or quaternary structure in regions where AF2 predicts low to moderate confidence, ii) inaccurate structure in regions where AF2 predicts high model confidence, iii) correct backbone structure but incorrect fine details (i.e., side chain rotamer placements), and iv) correct backbone”
§ The power and pitfalls of AlphaFold2 for structure prediction beyond rigid globular proteins > A critical evaluation of AlphaFold2’s applications
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Bryant et al reported a 63% success rate for heterodimeric complexes56”
§ The power and pitfalls of AlphaFold2 for structure prediction beyond rigid globular proteins > A critical evaluation of AlphaFold2’s applications
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [56] Bryant, P., Pozzati, G. & Elofsson, A. Improved prediction of protein–protein interactions using AlphaFold2. Nat. Commun. 13, 1265 (2022).
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“several groups have shown that modifications of AF2 have the potential to generate models that significantly deviate from each other, allowing for sampling of conformational landscapes”
§ The power and pitfalls of AlphaFold2 for structure prediction beyond rigid globular proteins > A critical evaluation of AlphaFold2’s applications
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“other reports have compared pLDDT scores with crystallographic B-factors to suggest AF2 confidence metrics are unable to provide direct information on local flexibility66”
§ The power and pitfalls of AlphaFold2 for structure prediction beyond rigid globular proteins > Evaluation metrics and model reliability
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [66] Carugo, O. pLDDT values in AlphaFold2 protein models are unrelated to globular protein local flexibility. Crystals 13, 1560 (2023). source
hedged- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“if the “best” AF2 model exhibits many residues with low pLDDT (< 70) or high PAE values (> 5 Å), the likelihood that the backbone structure matches the native conformation is very low and the model cannot be reliably interpreted”
§ The power and pitfalls of AlphaFold2 for structure prediction beyond rigid globular proteins > Evaluation metrics and model reliability
hedgedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“additional strategies such as the combination of Vc, Qr, X2free, and Rsas metrics have been proposed as more robust evaluation metrics75.”
§ The power and pitfalls of AlphaFold2 for structure prediction beyond rigid globular proteins > Integration of AF2 models with experimental data
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [75] Rambo, R. P. & Tainer, J. A. Accurate assessment of mass, models and resolution by small-angle scattering. Nature 496, 477–481 (2013). source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“AlphaMissense, does not explicitly determine the structural effects of a mutation on a protein but provides the probability of a missense variant being pathogenic51”
§ The power and pitfalls of AlphaFold2 for structure prediction beyond rigid globular proteins > A critical evaluation of AlphaFold2’s applications
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [51] Cheng, J. et al. Accurate proteome-wide missense variant effect prediction with AlphaMissense. Science 381, eadg7492 (2023). source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Standard molecular replacement strategies require 3D coordinates of a template/homologous structure and work best when the template is < 2 Å Cα RMSD from the target structure80.”
§ The power and pitfalls of AlphaFold2 for structure prediction beyond rigid globular proteins > Integration of AF2 models with experimental data
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [80] Abergel, C. Molecular replacement: tricks and treats. Acta Crystallogr. D 69, 2167–2173 (2013). source
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“which may be due to a training bias on stable structures or an inability to extract signal from small mutations through MSAs”
§ The power and pitfalls of AlphaFold2 for structure prediction beyond rigid globular proteins > A critical evaluation of AlphaFold2’s applications
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Some groups have used MD simulations to suggest that pLDDT and PAE metrics provide information on dynamics and disorder42,65”
§ The power and pitfalls of AlphaFold2 for structure prediction beyond rigid globular proteins > Evaluation metrics and model reliability
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [42] Ruff, K. M. & Pappu, R. V. AlphaFold and implications for intrinsically disordered proteins. J. Mol. Biol. 433, 167208 (2021). source
- Not checked yetcites [65] Guo, H.-B. et al. AlphaFold2 models indicate that protein sequence determines both structure and dynamics. Sci. Rep. 12, 10696 (2022).
hedgedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Preliminary reports also suggest that AF2 may also be able to predict oligomeric states of proteins and amyloids17,57”
§ The power and pitfalls of AlphaFold2 for structure prediction beyond rigid globular proteins > A critical evaluation of AlphaFold2’s applications
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [17] Akdel, M. et al. A structural biology community assessment of AlphaFold2 applications. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 29, 1056–1067 (2022). source
- Not checked yetcites [57] Jeppesen, M. & André, I. Accurate prediction of protein assembly structure by combining AlphaFold and symmetrical docking. Nat. Commun. 14, 8283 (2023). source
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Slight deviations in tertiary structure are noted, such as for the nuclear transport factor 2 derived de novo designed protein NT-9, but the overall structure is well described (Fig. 2j)”
§ The power and pitfalls of AlphaFold2 for structure prediction beyond rigid globular proteins > A critical evaluation of AlphaFold2’s applications
plainSingle case- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“The standard implementation of AlphaFold performs well only in detecting a single structural snapshot (the “ground state” structure), likely due to the lack of a large set of redundant protein conformers in the training set16,32.”
§ The power and pitfalls of AlphaFold2 for structure prediction beyond rigid globular proteins > Beyond static snapshots: ensembles and conformational landscapes
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [16] Chakravarty, D. & Porter, L. L. AlphaFold2 fails to predict protein fold switching. Protein Sci. 31, e4353 (2022). source
- Not checked yetcites [32] Saldaño, T. et al. Impact of protein conformational diversity on AlphaFold predictions. Bioinformatics 38, 2742–2748 (2022). source
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“This is especially helpful for large biological assemblies where methyl side-chain labeling affords an increase in signal and resolution91,92.”
§ The power and pitfalls of AlphaFold2 for structure prediction beyond rigid globular proteins > Integration of AF2 models with experimental data
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [91] McShan, A. C. Utility of methyl side chain probes for solution NMR studies of large proteins. J. Magn. Reson. Open 14–15, 100087 (2023).
- Not checked yetcites [92] Ruschak, A. M. & Kay, L. E. Methyl groups as probes of supra-molecular structure, dynamics and function. J. Biomol. NMR 46, 75–87 (2009).
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Current implementations of AF2 can provide highly accurate working models for most rigid, well-folded globular proteins, but may have issues predicting other classes of proteins.”
§ The power and pitfalls of AlphaFold2 for structure prediction beyond rigid globular proteins > Conclusions and outlook
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Reports suggest AF2 models should not be fit into cryo-EM maps with resolution greater than 6Å98,99.”
§ The power and pitfalls of AlphaFold2 for structure prediction beyond rigid globular proteins > Integration of AF2 models with experimental data
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [98] Dai, X., Wu, L., Yoo, S. & Liu, Q. Integrating AlphaFold and deep learning for atomistic interpretation of cryo-EM maps. Brief. Bioinform. 24, bbad405 (2023).
- Not checked yetcites [99] Alshammari, M., He, J. & Wriggers, W. Appraisal of AlphaFold2-predicted models in cryo-EM map interpretation. Microsc. Microanal. 29, 977–978 (2023). source
hedged- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“The use of experimental data, especially SAXS, NMR, and cryo-EM, has also been described to guide modeling of ensembles and alternative conformations71,82,108.”
§ The power and pitfalls of AlphaFold2 for structure prediction beyond rigid globular proteins > Beyond static snapshots: ensembles and conformational landscapes
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [71] Brookes, E., Rocco, M., Vachette, P. & Trewhella, J. AlphaFold-predicted protein structures and small-angle X-ray scattering: insights from an extended examination of selected data in the Small-Angle Scattering Biological Data Bank. J. Appl. Crystallogr. 56, 910–926 (2023). source
- Not checked yetcites [82] Abdollahi, H., Prestegard, J. H. & Valafar, H. Computational modeling multiple conformational states of proteins with residual dipolar coupling data. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 82, 102655 (2023). source
- Not checked yetcites [108] Ramelot, T. A., Tejero, R. & Montelione, G. T. Representing structures of the multiple conformational states of proteins. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 83, 102703 (2023). source
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Investigators built an AlphaFold2 model of WSB1, refined it with molecular simulation, and conducted virtual screening across millions of compounds.”
From Artificial Intelligence in Clinical Oncology: From Productivity Enhancement to Creative Discovery (2025) · cites this paper as [104]
In the citing paper
“Approximately 20 candidates were selected for synthesis and testing, yielding four lead molecules.”
From Artificial Intelligence in Clinical Oncology: From Productivity Enhancement to Creative Discovery (2025) · cites this paper as [104]
In the citing paper
“A second example concerns WSB1, a protein linked to metastasis through hypoxia-response pathways in lung and pancreatic cancers but historically underexplored as a drug target [104].”
From Artificial Intelligence in Clinical Oncology: From Productivity Enhancement to Creative Discovery (2025) · cites this paper as [104]
Citations
Cites
Highly accurate protein structure prediction with AlphaFold
Jumper, J., Evans, R., Pritzel, A., Green, T., Figurnov, M., Ronneberger, O., Tunyasuvunakool, K., Bates, R., Žídek, A., Potapenko, A., et al. (2021) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03819-2 · Cited by 43,764 · cited 7×
“…with its deep learning algorithm that enables accurate prediction of three-dimensional (3D) protein structures from only the target amino acid sequence, potentially solving the half-a-century-old protein structure-prediction problem: how to predict 3D structures from only sequence information 1–4 .”
BackgroundResultInfluentialColabFold - Making protein folding accessible to all
Mirdita, M., Schütze, K., Moriwaki, Y., Heo, L., Ovchinnikov, S., & Steinegger, M. (2021) · doi:10.1101/2021.08.15.456425 · Cited by 9,391 · cited 2×
“For targets without known homologs, such as computationally designed proteins, increasing the Perspective https://doi.org/10.1038/s41589-024-01638-w number of recycling iterations can improve the quality of the prediction 8 .”
BackgroundInfluentialVaradi, M., Anyango, S., Deshpande, M., Nair, S., Natassia, C., Yordanova, G., Yuan, D., Stroe, O., Wood, G., Laydon, A., et al. (2022) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkab1061 · Cited by 7,850 · cited 1×
“Several efforts have alleviated these limitations, including the Alpha-Fold Protein Structure Database 6,7 , which houses over 200 million pre-run AF2 predictions, as well as ColabFold 8 and OpenFold 9 , which allow users to run a modified AF2 protocol on open-access servers in minutes.”
BackgroundEvolutionary-scale prediction of atomic level protein structure with a language model
Lin, Z., Akin, H., Rao, R., Hie, B., Zhu, Z., Lu, W., Smetanin, N., Verkuil, R., Kabeli, O., Shmueli, Y., et al. (2022) · doi:10.1101/2022.07.20.500902 · Cited by 5,990
Accurate prediction of protein structures and interactions using a 3-track network
Baek, M., DiMaio, F., Anishchenko, I., Dauparas, J., Ovchinnikov, S., Lee, G. R., Wang, J., Cong, Q., Kinch, L. N., Schaeffer, R. D., et al. (2021) · doi:10.1101/2021.06.14.448402 · Cited by 5,549
Protein complex prediction with AlphaFold-Multimer
Evans, R., O’Neill, M., Pritzel, A., Antropova, N., Senior, A., Green, T., Žídek, A., Bates, R., Blackwell, S., Yim, J., et al. (2021) · doi:10.1101/2021.10.04.463034 · Cited by 3,808 · cited 1×
“When more than one input sequence is provided, AlphaFold-Multimer or AF2Complex is used 20,21 .”
Highly accurate protein structure prediction for the human proteome
Tunyasuvunakool, K., Adler, J., Wu, Z., Green, T., Zielinski, M., Žídek, A., Bridgland, A., Cowie, A., Meyer, C., Laydon, A., et al. (2021) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03828-1 · Cited by 3,025 · cited 6×
“The authors of AF2 note that, because it is trained on both apo and holo structures from the PDB, models may still be consistent with the expected structure in the presence of ligands or cofactors despite their absence in the AF2 workflow 1,5 .”
BackgroundInfluentialAccurate proteome-wide missense variant effect prediction with AlphaMissense
Cheng, J., Novati, G., Pan, J., Bycroft, C., Žemgulytė, A., Applebaum, T., Pritzel, A., Wong, L. H., Zielinski, M., Sargeant, T., et al. (2023) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.adg7492 · Cited by 2,163 · cited 2×
“A recent adaption of AlphaFold, AlphaMissense, does not explicitly determine the structural effects of a mutation on a protein but provides the probability of a missense variant being pathogenic 51 .”
BackgroundMethodVaradi, M., Bertoni, D., Magana, P., Paramval, U., Pidruchna, I., Radhakrishnan, M., Tsenkov, M., Nair, S., Mirdita, M., Yeo, J., et al. (2024) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkad1011 · Cited by 2,052 · cited 1×
“Several efforts have alleviated these limitations, including the Alpha-Fold Protein Structure Database 6,7 , which houses over 200 million pre-run AF2 predictions, as well as ColabFold 8 and OpenFold 9 , which allow users to run a modified AF2 protocol on open-access servers in minutes.”
BackgroundThe Rosetta All-Atom Energy Function for Macromolecular Modeling and Design
Alford, R. F., Leaver-Fay, A., Jeliazkov, J. R., O’Meara, M. J., DiMaio, F. P., Park, H., Shapovalov, M. V., Renfrew, P. D., Mulligan, V. K., Kappel, K., et al. (2017) · Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation · doi:10.1021/acs.jctc.7b00125 · Cited by 1,532
Harnessing protein folding neural networks for peptide–protein docking
Tsaban, T., Varga, J. K., Avraham, O., Ben-Aharon, Z., Khramushin, A., & Schueler-Furman, O. (2022) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-021-27838-9 · Cited by 1,205
Mariani, V., Biasini, M., Barbato, A., & Schwede, T. (2013) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btt473 · Cited by 1,138
Improved prediction of protein-protein interactions using AlphaFold2
Bryant, P., Pozzati, G., & Elofsson, A. (2021) · doi:10.1101/2021.09.15.460468 · Cited by 1,022 · cited 1×
“A separate study by Bryant et al. 56 reported a 63% success rate for heterodimeric complexes.”
ResultAccurate assessment of mass, models and resolution by small-angle scattering
Rambo, R. P., & Tainer, J. A. (2013) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature12070 · Cited by 750 · cited 1×
“Typically, χ 2 values of less than one are indicative of overfitting, and additional strategies such as the combination of V c , Qr , X 2 free and R sas metrics have been proposed as more robust evaluation metrics 75 .”
MethodA structural biology community assessment of AlphaFold2 applications
Akdel, M., Pires, D. E. V., Pardo, E. P., Jänes, J., Zalevsky, A. O., Mészáros, B., Bryant, P., Good, L. L., Laskowski, R. A., Pozzati, G., et al. (2022) · Nature Structural & Molecular Biology · doi:10.1038/s41594-022-00849-w · Cited by 675 · cited 7×
“Evaluation of protein–protein interactions, including oligomerization, is another major potential application of AF2 that continues to be explored 17 .”
BackgroundInfluentialAlphaFold and Implications for Intrinsically Disordered Proteins
Ruff, K. M., & Pappu, R. V. (2021) · Journal of Molecular Biology · doi:10.1016/j.jmb.2021.167208 · Cited by 635 · cited 6×
“Some groups have used MD simulations to suggest that pLDDT and PAE metrics provide information on dynamics and disorder 42,65 .”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialPredicting multiple conformations via sequence clustering and AlphaFold2
Wayment-Steele, H. K., Ojoawo, A., Otten, R., Apitz, J. M., Pitsawong, W., Hömberger, M., Ovchinnikov, S., Colwell, L., & Kern, D. (2024) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-023-06832-9 · Cited by 545 · cited 3×
“Initial efforts to enhance sampling of different conformations have involved altering the number of sequences used to generate shallower MSA representations, masking coevolution-ary information provided by MSAs and splitting conflicting coevolutionary signals by clustering MSAs 46,47,105 .”
BackgroundSampling alternative conformational states of transporters and receptors with AlphaFold2
del Alamo, D., Sala, D., Mchaourab, H. S., & Meiler, J. (2022) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.75751 · Cited by 511
AlphaFill: enriching AlphaFold models with ligands and cofactors
Hekkelman, M. L., de Vries, I., Joosten, R. P., & Perrakis, A. (2023) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/s41592-022-01685-y · Cited by 511 · cited 2×
“New algorithms, such as AlphaFill, are actively being developed that could improve AF2 structure prediction and refinement for cofactor, prosthetic group-or ligand-bound proteins 33 .”
BackgroundMethodAhdritz, G., Bouatta, N., Floristean, C., Kadyan, S., Xia, Q., Gerecke, W., O’Donnell, T. J., Berenberg, D., Fisk, I., Zanichelli, N., et al. (2024) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/s41592-024-02272-z · Cited by 439
Wei, G., Xi, W., Nussinov, R., & Ma, B. (2016) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.5b00562 · Cited by 436 · cited 1×
“Native conformations of proteins are often described as time-averaged ensembles of conformations with Boltzmann-type distributions, especially IDPs and proteins with IDRs 100,101 .”
BackgroundGeometric deep learning of RNA structure
Townshend, R. J. L., Eismann, S., Watkins, A. M., Rangan, R., Karelina, M., Das, R., & Dror, R. O. (2021) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.abe5650 · Cited by 424
Terwilliger, T. C., Liebschner, D., Croll, T. I., Williams, C. J., McCoy, A. J., Poon, B. K., Afonine, P. V., Oeffner, R. D., Richardson, J. S., Read, R. J., et al. (2024) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/s41592-023-02087-4 · Cited by 411 · cited 1×
“Terwilliger et al. 61 estimate that ~10% of residues predicted by AF2 with high confidence deviate from the backbone by more than 2 Å from native conformations observed in experimental structures.”
BackgroundBenchmarking AlphaFold for protein complex modeling reveals accuracy determinants
Yin, R., Feng, B. Y., Varshney, A., & Pierce, B. G. (2022) · Protein Science · doi:10.1002/pro.4379 · Cited by 335 · cited 1×
“Yin et al. 55,54 benchmarked 152 heterodimeric protein complexes, revealing that AF2 and AlphaFold2-Multimer had a 51% success rate.”
BackgroundBenchmarking AlphaFold for protein complex modeling reveals accuracy determinants
Yin, R., Feng, B. Y., Varshney, A., & Pierce, B. G. (2021) · doi:10.1101/2021.10.23.465575 · Cited by 335
Can AlphaFold2 predict the impact of missense mutations on structure?
Buel, G. R., & Walters, K. J. (2022) · Nature Structural & Molecular Biology · doi:10.1038/s41594-021-00714-2 · Cited by 332 · cited 1×
“In support of this, studies have reported an inability of AF2 to predict the effects of mutations on protein structure and stability 14,49,50 , which may be due to a training bias on stable structures or an inability to extract signal from small mutations through MSAs.”
ResultUsing AlphaFold to predict the impact of single mutations on protein stability and function
Pak, M. A., Markhieva, K. A., Novikova, M. S., Petrov, D. S., Vorobyev, I. S., Maksimova, E. S., Kondrashov, F. A., & Ivankov, D. N. (2023) · PLOS One · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0282689 · Cited by 322 · cited 1×
“In support of this, studies have reported an inability of AF2 to predict the effects of mutations on protein structure and stability 14,49,50 , which may be due to a training bias on stable structures or an inability to extract signal from small mutations through MSAs.”
ResultState-of-the-Art Estimation of Protein Model Accuracy Using AlphaFold
Roney, J. P., & Ovchinnikov, S. (2022) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.129.238101 · Cited by 281
The AlphaFold Database of Protein Structures: A Biologist’s Guide
David, A., Islam, S., Tankhilevich, E., & Sternberg, M. J. E. (2022) · Journal of Molecular Biology · doi:10.1016/j.jmb.2021.167336 · Cited by 268 · cited 1×
“Furthermore, the accuracy of PAE graphs for interdomain prediction has not been as extensively benchmarked as for intradomain contacts 36 .”
BackgroundStereoselective amino acid synthesis by synergistic photoredox-pyridoxal radical biocatalysis
Cheng, L., Li, D., Mai, B. K., Bo, Z., Cheng, L., Liu, P., & Yang, Y. (2023) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.adg2420 · Cited by 253
AF2Complex predicts direct physical interactions in multimeric proteins with deep learning
Gao, M., Nakajima An, D., Parks, J. M., & Skolnick, J. (2022) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-022-29394-2 · Cited by 252 · cited 1×
“When more than one input sequence is provided, AlphaFold-Multimer or AF2Complex is used 20,21 .”
MethodSkolnick, J., Gao, M., Zhou, H., & Singh, S. (2021) · Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling · doi:10.1021/acs.jcim.1c01114 · Cited by 251
AlphaFold2 models indicate that protein sequence determines both structure and dynamics
Guo, H.-B., Perminov, A., Bekele, S., Kedziora, G., Farajollahi, S., Varaljay, V., Hinkle, K., Molinero, V., Meister, K., Hung, C., et al. (2022) · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-1666858/v1 · Cited by 248
AlphaFold2 models indicate that protein sequence determines both structure and dynamics
Guo, H.-B., Perminov, A., Bekele, S., Kedziora, G., Farajollahi, S., Varaljay, V., Hinkle, K., Molinero, V., Meister, K., Hung, C., et al. (2022) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-022-14382-9 · Cited by 248 · cited 3×
“Some groups have used MD simulations to suggest that pLDDT and PAE metrics provide information on dynamics and disorder 42,65 .”
BackgroundMethodSystematic identification of conditionally folded intrinsically disordered regions by AlphaFold2
Alderson, T. R., Pritišanac, I., Kolarić, Đ., Moses, A. M., & Forman-Kay, J. D. (2023) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.2304302120 · Cited by 240 · cited 4×
“…use of AlphaFold models in molecular replacement can be further enhanced by downweighting or removing low-confidence regions 23 . https://doi.org/10.1038/s41589-024-01638-w Another burgeoning area where AlphaFold models are integrated with experimental data is solution-state NMR 15,27,28,30,81–85 .”
BackgroundInfluentialMulti‐state modeling of G‐protein coupled receptors at experimental accuracy
Heo, L., & Feig, M. (2022) · Proteins: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics · doi:10.1002/prot.26382 · Cited by 215 · cited 1×
“Apart from IDPs, well-folded globular proteins, such as G-protein-coupled receptors and kinases, also sample a wide range of conformations to carry out their biological function 102,103 .”
BackgroundEvaluation of AlphaFold-Multimer prediction on multi-chain protein complexes
Zhu, W., Shenoy, A., Kundrotas, P., & Elofsson, A. (2023) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btad424 · Cited by 202 · cited 1×
“Updated and refined approaches for error categorization may provide better methods for model quality assessment relative to pLDDT and PAE metrics 14,67 .”
MethodImpact of protein conformational diversity on AlphaFold predictions
Saldaño, T., Escobedo, N., Marchetti, J., Zea, D. J., Mac Donagh, J., Velez Rueda, A. J., Gonik, E., García Melani, A., Novomisky Nechcoff, J., Salas, M. N., et al. (2022) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btac202 · Cited by 196
Impact of protein conformational diversity on AlphaFold predictions
Saldaño, T., Escobedo, N., Marchetti, J., Zea, D. J., Mac Donagh, J., Velez Rueda, A. J., Gonik, E., Melani, A. G., Novomisky Nechcoff, J., Salas, M. N., et al. (2021) · doi:10.1101/2021.10.27.466189 · Cited by 196 · cited 2×
“The standard implementation of AlphaFold performs well only in detecting a single structural snapshot (the ‘ground state’ structure), likely due to the lack of a large set of redundant protein conformers in the training set 16,32 .”
BackgroundStructure of cytoplasmic ring of nuclear pore complex by integrative cryo-EM and AlphaFold
Fontana, P., Dong, Y., Pi, X., Tong, A. B., Hecksel, C. W., Wang, L., Fu, T.-M., Bustamante, C., & Wu, H. (2022) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.abm9326 · Cited by 195 · cited 1×
“The use of AlphaFold models in structure-determination protocols has been shown to reduce the time and effort required relative to ab initio model building 68–70 .”
MethodAlphaFold2 fails to predict protein fold switching
Chakravarty, D., & Porter, L. L. (2022) · Protein Science · doi:10.1002/pro.4353 · Cited by 193 · cited 2×
“These deviations can be broadly categorized into cases with (1) inaccurate secondary, tertiary and/or quaternary the accuracy of the standard implementation of AF2 against different types of nonglobular molecular targets, which could limit its potential applications 15,16 .”
BackgroundAI revolutions in biology: The joys and perils of AlphaFold
Perrakis, A., & Sixma, T. K. (2021) · The EMBO Reports · doi:10.15252/embr.202154046 · Cited by 190
AlphaFold heralds a data-driven revolution in biology and medicine
Thornton, J. M., Laskowski, R. A., & Borkakoti, N. (2021) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41591-021-01533-0 · Cited by 185 · cited 1×
“2b), potentially due to the https://doi.org/10.1038/s41589-024-01638-w inability of AF2 to orient cysteine pairs for disulfide bond formation 31 .”
BackgroundInfluentialModeling conformational states of proteins with AlphaFold
Sala, D., Engelberger, F., Mchaourab, H. S., & Meiler, J. (2023) · Current Opinion in Structural Biology · doi:10.1016/j.sbi.2023.102645 · Cited by 182 · cited 1×
“Thus, several groups have worked to extend AlphaFold to include predictions of structural ensembles and excited state structures 102,104 .”
BackgroundAlphaFold2: A Role for Disordered Protein/Region Prediction?
Wilson, C. J., Choy, W.-Y., & Karttunen, M. (2022) · International Journal of Molecular Sciences · doi:10.3390/ijms23094591 · Cited by 173 · cited 1×
“Further benchmarking of modified AF2 protocols against IDPs, IDR-containing proteins and alternative conformation is required to establish protein prediction strengths and limitations for those of systems 43,48 .”
AFsample: improving multimer prediction with AlphaFold using massive sampling
Wallner, B. (2023) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btad573 · Cited by 164 · cited 1×
“Another approach is to enable dropout layers in the neural network, which are usually commonly used only during neural network training 8,106,107 .”
BackgroundIntrinsic protein disorder and conditional folding in AlphaFoldDB
Piovesan, D., Monzon, A. M., & Tosatto, S. C. E. (2022) · Protein Science · doi:10.1002/pro.4466 · Cited by 160 · cited 2×
“Future benchmarks should continue to evaluate AF2 against panels of IDPs and IDR-containing proteins using novel critical assessment of protein intrinsic disorder targets 44 .”
BackgroundBenchmarking AlphaFold2 on peptide structure prediction
McDonald, E. F., Jones, T., Plate, L., Meiler, J., & Gulsevin, A. (2023) · Structure · doi:10.1016/j.str.2022.11.012 · Cited by 152 · cited 4×
“McDonald et al. 25 performed a benchmark of 588 peptides, revealing that AF2 predicts many α-helical and β-hairpin peptide structures with surprising accuracy.”
BackgroundInfluentialStructural basis for channel conduction in the pump-like channelrhodopsin ChRmine
Kishi, K. E., Kim, Y. S., Fukuda, M., Inoue, M., Kusakizako, T., Wang, P. Y., Ramakrishnan, C., Byrne, E. F. X., Thadhani, E., Paggi, J. M., et al. (2022) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2022.01.007 · Cited by 149
Yin, R., & Pierce, B. G. (2024) · Protein Science · doi:10.1002/pro.4865 · Cited by 145 · cited 1×
“Yin et al. 55,54 benchmarked 152 heterodimeric protein complexes, revealing that AF2 and AlphaFold2-Multimer had a 51% success rate.”
BackgroundImproved AlphaFold modeling with implicit experimental information
Terwilliger, T. C., Poon, B. K., Afonine, P. V., Schlicksup, C. J., Croll, T. I., Millán, C., Richardson, J. S., Read, R. J., & Adams, P. D. (2022) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/s41592-022-01645-6 · Cited by 140 · cited 5×
“Recently, an AF2-integrated iterative procedure for molecular replacement has been developed in which AlphaFold models are used during the initial structure-solution cycle, followed by data-guided cycles of AlphaFold structure prediction and model rebuilding 60,69 .”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialIns and outs of AlphaFold2 transmembrane protein structure predictions
Hegedűs, T., Geisler, M., Lukács, G. L., & Farkas, B. (2022) · Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences · doi:10.1007/s00018-021-04112-1 · Cited by 127 · cited 2×
“Benchmarking AF2 against membrane proteins represents a challenge, as the membrane environment, which includes lipids and other proteins, is not directly considered by current versions of AlphaFold 38 .”
BackgroundProtein structure prediction has reached the single-structure frontier
Lane, T. J. (2023) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/s41592-022-01760-4 · Cited by 125
Peptide-binding specificity prediction using fine-tuned protein structure prediction networks
Motmaen, A., Dauparas, J., Baek, M., Abedi, M. H., Baker, D., & Bradley, P. (2023) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.2216697120 · Cited by 124 · cited 1×
“Several groups have reported cases of AF2 models with low PAE values ( 5 Å) that deviated from experimental data 62,63 .”
BackgroundVela, S. D., & Svergun, D. I. (2020) · Current Research in Structural Biology · doi:10.1016/j.crstbi.2020.08.004 · Cited by 108 · cited 1×
“An important caveat is that one must be wary of overfitting AF2 models to SAXS envelopes, especially for lower-resolution data 74 .”
BackgroundThe accuracy of protein structures in solution determined by AlphaFold and NMR
Fowler, N. J., & Williamson, M. P. (2022) · Structure · doi:10.1016/j.str.2022.04.005 · Cited by 104
Implications of AlphaFold 2 for crystallographic phasing by molecular replacement
McCoy, A. J., Sammito, M. D., & Read, R. J. (2022) · Acta Crystallographica Section D Structural Biology · doi:10.1107/s2059798321012122 · Cited by 104
Glycoinformatics in the Artificial Intelligence Era
Bojar, D., & Lisacek, F. (2022) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.2c00110 · Cited by 103
De novo protein design by inversion of the AlphaFold structure prediction network
Goverde, C. A., Wolf, B., Khakzad, H., Rosset, S., & Correia, B. E. (2023) · Protein Science · doi:10.1002/pro.4653 · Cited by 103 · cited 1×
“An inverted version of AlphaFold, called AlphaDesign, has been used for de novo protein design with some success 53 .”
MethodProtein folds vs. protein folding: Differing questions, different challenges
Chen, S., Hassan, M., Jernigan, R. L., Jia, K., Kihara, D., Kloczkowski, A., Kotelnikov, S., Kozakov, D., Liang, J., Liwo, A., et al. (2022) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.2214423119 · Cited by 100 · cited 1×
“Several groups have proposed that AF2 has only learned how to estimate 3D structures using patterns extracted from known folds in the Protein Data Bank (PDB) and coevolutionary information between residues rather than the underlying physical and chemical basis of protein folding 3,10–12 .”
BackgroundHow accurately can one predict drug binding modes using AlphaFold models?
(2023) · doi:10.7554/elife.89386.2 · Cited by 98 · cited 1×
“The most dramatic case is when AF2 provides excellent evaluation metrics despite complete disagreement of the model’s backbone structure with an experimental structure.”
AlphaFold 2 and NMR Spectroscopy: Partners to Understand Protein Structure, Dynamics and Function
Laurents, D. V. (2022) · Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences · doi:10.3389/fmolb.2022.906437 · Cited by 95 · cited 5×
“Refinement of AF2-derived models with NMR-derived restraints, such as chemical shift values, torsion angles, residual dipolar couplings (RDCs) and nuclear Overhauser effect (NOE) data, could help improve accuracy of peptide modeling 15 .”
BackgroundInfluentialAlphaFold and the amyloid landscape
Pinheiro, F., Santos, J., & Ventura, S. (2021) · Journal of Molecular Biology · doi:10.1016/j.jmb.2021.167059 · Cited by 88 · cited 1×
“However, care must be taken when interpreting predictions, as highlighted by the incorrect AF2 model of the β-endorphin amyloid fiber relative to its experimental solid-state NMR structure 58 (Fig.”
MethodLindorff-Larsen, K., & Kragelund, B. B. (2021) · Journal of Molecular Biology · doi:10.1016/j.jmb.2021.167196 · Cited by 85 · cited 5×
“Preliminary studies suggest that the majority of targets with very low confidence score (pLDDT 50) assigned by AF2 are likely to be IDPs or IDRs rather than well-folded structures that AF2 fails to predict 42–44 .”
BackgroundInfluentialCurrent structure predictors are not learning the physics of protein folding
Outeiral, C., Nissley, D. A., & Deane, C. M. (2022) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btab881 · Cited by 82 · cited 1×
“Several groups have proposed that AF2 has only learned how to estimate 3D structures using patterns extracted from known folds in the Protein Data Bank (PDB) and coevolutionary information between residues rather than the underlying physical and chemical basis of protein folding 3,10–12 .”
BackgroundAlphaFold illuminates half of the dark human proteins
Binder, J. L., Berendzen, J., Stevens, A. O., He, Y., Wang, J., Dokholyan, N. V., & Oprea, T. I. (2022) · Current Opinion in Structural Biology · doi:10.1016/j.sbi.2022.102372 · Cited by 81 · cited 2×
“Previous analysis suggests that AF2 predicts on average ~50% of residues across all proteins with high confidence 17,59 .”
BackgroundSala, D., Hildebrand, P. W., & Meiler, J. (2023) · Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences · doi:10.3389/fmolb.2023.1121962 · Cited by 80 · cited 2×
“Thus, several groups have worked to extend AlphaFold to include predictions of structural ensembles and excited state structures 102,104 .”
BackgroundPredicting protein flexibility with AlphaFold
Ma, P., Li, D., & Brüschweiler, R. (2023) · Proteins Structure Function and Bioinformatics · doi:10.1002/prot.26471 · Cited by 72 · cited 1×
“…use of AlphaFold models in molecular replacement can be further enhanced by downweighting or removing low-confidence regions 23 . https://doi.org/10.1038/s41589-024-01638-w Another burgeoning area where AlphaFold models are integrated with experimental data is solution-state NMR 15,27,28,30,81–85 .”
BackgroundInfluentialAccurate modeling of peptide-MHC structures with AlphaFold
Mikhaylov, V., Brambley, C. A., Keller, G. L. J., Arbuiso, A. G., Weiss, L. I., Baker, B. M., & Levine, A. J. (2024) · Structure · doi:10.1016/j.str.2023.11.011 · Cited by 72 · cited 1×
“New methods are fine-tuning AF2-based pipelines for specific types of peptide–protein complexes (that is, peptide–major histocompatibility complex) 26 .”
MethodProtein structure prediction by AlphaFold 2: are attention and symmetries all you need?
Bouatta, N., Sorger, P., & AlQuraishi, M. (2021) · Acta Crystallographica Section D Structural Biology · doi:10.1107/s2059798321007531 · Cited by 69 · cited 1×
“…with its deep learning algorithm that enables accurate prediction of three-dimensional (3D) protein structures from only the target amino acid sequence, potentially solving the half-a-century-old protein structure-prediction problem: how to predict 3D structures from only sequence information 1–4 .”
Putting AlphaFold models to work with phenix.process_predicted_model and ISOLDE
Oeffner, R. D., Croll, T. I., Millán, C., Poon, B. K., Schlicksup, C. J., Read, R. J., & Terwilliger, T. C. (2022) · Acta Crystallographica Section D Structural Biology · doi:10.1107/s2059798322010026 · Cited by 63 · cited 4×
“Recent methods have shown that fitting of SAXS data substantially improves when an ensemble of AlphaFold-predicted structures is used rather than a static AlphaFold model 71 , highlighting the importance of integrating AlphaFold models with experimental data.”
InfluentialAccelerating crystal structure determination with iterative AlphaFold prediction
Terwilliger, T. C., Afonine, P. V., Liebschner, D., Croll, T. I., McCoy, A. J., Oeffner, R. D., Williams, C. J., Poon, B. K., Richardson, J. S., Read, R. J., et al. (2023) · Acta Crystallographica Section D Structural Biology · doi:10.1107/s205979832300102x · Cited by 62 · cited 1×
“The use of experimental data, especially SAXS, NMR and cryo-EM, has also been described to guide modeling of ensembles and alternative conformations 71,82,108 .”
Robertson, A. J., Courtney, J. M., Shen, Y., Ying, J., & Bax, A. (2021) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/jacs.1c10588 · Cited by 59 · cited 1×
“A series of AF2 models can be compared with experimental NMR data in the form of distance-and conformation-sensitive structural restraints obtained from NOEs 81 , RDCs 29,86 , paramagnetic relaxation enhancements 87,88 and/or pseudocontact shifts 89 (Fig.”
BackgroundGiri, N., Roy, R. S., & Cheng, J. (2023) · Current Opinion in Structural Biology · doi:10.1016/j.sbi.2023.102536 · Cited by 59 · cited 1×
“AlphaFold models have also been used extensively together with single-particle cryo-EM data 60,76,95,96 (Fig.”
MethodAlphaFold Models of Small Proteins Rival the Accuracy of Solution NMR Structures
Tejero, R., Huang, Y. J., Ramelot, T. A., & Montelione, G. T. (2022) · Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences · doi:10.3389/fmolb.2022.877000 · Cited by 56 · cited 2×
“…use of AlphaFold models in molecular replacement can be further enhanced by downweighting or removing low-confidence regions 23 . https://doi.org/10.1038/s41589-024-01638-w Another burgeoning area where AlphaFold models are integrated with experimental data is solution-state NMR 15,27,28,30,81–85 .”
BackgroundInfluentialThe Epigenetic Dimension of Protein Structure Is an Intrinsic Weakness of the AlphaFold Program
Azzaz, F., Yahi, N., Chahinian, H., & Fantini, J. (2022) · Biomolecules · doi:10.3390/biom12101527 · Cited by 53 · cited 2×
“In agreement with these findings, Azzaz et al. 40 have shown the difficulty of AF2 in modeling membrane proteins owing to ‘epigenetic’ factors (that is, lipid environment, co-receptor-induced structural changes, post-translational modifications) that control protein structure beyond the amino acid sequence.”
ResultBarbarin-Bocahu, I., & Graille, M. (2022) · Acta Crystallographica Section D Structural Biology · doi:10.1107/s2059798322002157 · Cited by 52 · cited 1×
“The use of experimental data, especially SAXS, NMR and cryo-EM, has also been described to guide modeling of ensembles and alternative conformations 71,82,108 .”
NMR hawk‐eyed view of AlphaFold2 structures
Zweckstetter, M. (2021) · Protein Science · doi:10.1002/pro.4175 · Cited by 47 · cited 2×
“Refinement of AF2-derived models with NMR-derived restraints, such as chemical shift values, torsion angles, residual dipolar couplings (RDCs) and nuclear Overhauser effect (NOE) data, could help improve accuracy of peptide modeling 15 .”
BackgroundAutomatic structure-based NMR methyl resonance assignment in large proteins
Pritišanac, I., Würz, J. M., Alderson, T. R., & Güntert, P. (2019) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-019-12837-8 · Cited by 46 · cited 1×
“Here, NMR assignments for methyl side chain groups can be obtained using only methyl–methyl NOEs obtained from 3D NMR experiments and the atomic coordinates of a structure (or AF2-predicted structure) as input with software such as MAUS, MAGIC and methylFLYA 91,93,94 .”
MethodpLDDT Values in AlphaFold2 Protein Models Are Unrelated to Globular Protein Local Flexibility
Carugo, O. (2023) · Crystals · doi:10.3390/cryst13111560 · Cited by 46 · cited 1×
“However, other reports have compared pLDDT scores with crystallographic B factors to suggest that AF2 confidence metrics are unable to provide direct information on local flexibility 66 .”
BackgroundComputational models in the service of X‐ray and cryo‐ electron microscopy structure determination
Kryshtafovych, A., Moult, J., Albrecht, R., Chang, G. A., Chao, K., Fraser, A., Greenfield, J., Hartmann, M. D., Herzberg, O., Josts, I., et al. (2021) · Proteins: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics · doi:10.1002/prot.26223 · Cited by 45
Accurate prediction of protein assembly structure by combining AlphaFold and symmetrical docking
Jeppesen, M., & André, I. (2023) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-023-43681-6 · Cited by 44 · cited 1×
“Preliminary reports also suggest that AF2 may also be able to predict oligomeric states of proteins and amyloids 17,57 .”
BackgroundEffective Molecular Dynamics from Neural Network-Based Structure Prediction Models
Jussupow, A., & Kaila, V. R. I. (2023) · Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation · doi:10.1021/acs.jctc.2c01027 · Cited by 42 · cited 2×
“…are available (that is, in vitro recombinant protein production or in situ characterization is not possible), insights into the structure and function of proteins may be primarily guided by AF2 predictions supplemented with molecular dynamics simulations to further evaluate model stability 64,65 .”
BackgroundRecent Advances in NMR Protein Structure Prediction with ROSETTA
Leman, J. K., & Künze, G. (2023) · International Journal of Molecular Sciences · doi:10.3390/ijms24097835 · Cited by 38 · cited 1×
“A series of AF2 models can be compared with experimental NMR data in the form of distance-and conformation-sensitive structural restraints obtained from NOEs 81 , RDCs 29,86 , paramagnetic relaxation enhancements 87,88 and/or pseudocontact shifts 89 (Fig.”
BackgroundKlukowski, P., Riek, R., & Güntert, P. (2023) · Science Advances · doi:10.1126/sciadv.adi9323 · Cited by 38 · cited 2×
“Moreover, in the absence of NMR resonance assignments, AF2 models can be used as structural templates toward automated assignment 90 .”
MethodResultMolecular replacement: tricks and treats
Abergel, C. (2013) · Acta Crystallographica Section D Biological Crystallography · doi:10.1107/s0907444913015291 · Cited by 36 · cited 1×
“The use of experimental data, especially SAXS, NMR and cryo-EM, has also been described to guide modeling of ensembles and alternative conformations 71,82,108 .”
Lenard, A. J., Mulder, F. A. A., & Madl, T. (2022) · Progress in Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy · doi:10.1016/j.pnmrs.2022.09.001 · Cited by 36
McCafferty, C. L., Pennington, E. L., Papoulas, O., Taylor, D. W., & Marcotte, E. M. (2023) · Communications Biology · doi:10.1038/s42003-023-04773-7 · Cited by 35 · cited 1×
“Several groups have reported cases of AF2 models with low PAE values ( 5 Å) that deviated from experimental data 62,63 .”
BackgroundBlind assessment of monomeric AlphaFold2 protein structure models with experimental NMR data
Li, E. H., Spaman, L. E., Tejero, R., Huang, Y. J., Ramelot, T. A., Fraga, K. J., Prestegard, J. H., Kennedy, M. A., & Montelione, G. T. (2023) · Journal of Magnetic Resonance · doi:10.1016/j.jmr.2023.107481 · Cited by 34
Using AlphaFold for Rapid and Accurate Fixed Backbone Protein Design
Moffat, L., Greener, J. G., & Jones, D. T. (2021) · doi:10.1101/2021.08.24.457549 · Cited by 33 · cited 1×
“Updated and refined approaches for error categorization may provide better methods for model quality assessment relative to pLDDT and PAE metrics 14,67 .”
Next Generation Protein Structure Predictions and Genetic Variant Interpretation
Diwan, G. D., Gonzalez-Sanchez, J. C., Apic, G., & Russell, R. B. (2021) · Journal of Molecular Biology · doi:10.1016/j.jmb.2021.167180 · Cited by 30 · cited 2×
“Second, AF2 performs poorly for targets embedded in membrane thickness outside the range of 15–35 Å as well as targets with novel features not commonly present in the PDB.”
BackgroundHow AlphaFold2 shaped the structural coverage of the human transmembrane proteome
Jambrich, M. A., Tusnády, G., & Dobson, L. (2023) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-023-47204-7 · Cited by 27 · cited 2×
“5,37).”
BackgroundRepresenting structures of the multiple conformational states of proteins
Ramelot, T. A., Tejero, R., & Montelione, G. T. (2023) · Current Opinion in Structural Biology · doi:10.1016/j.sbi.2023.102703 · Cited by 26 · cited 1×
“The use of experimental data, especially SAXS, NMR and cryo-EM, has also been described to guide modeling of ensembles and alternative conformations 71,82,108 .”
MethodAlphaFold2 and CryoEM: Revisiting CryoEM modeling in near-atomic resolution density maps
Hryc, C. F., & Baker, M. L. (2022) · iScience · doi:10.1016/j.isci.2022.104496 · Cited by 25 · cited 2×
“A series of AF2 models are fitted into the 3D cryo-EM density maps, and each is evaluated for goodness of fit 96 and can be refined to generate a final structure 97 .”
MethodBrookes, E., Rocco, M., Vachette, P., & Trewhella, J. (2023) · Journal of Applied Crystallography · doi:10.1107/s1600576723005344 · Cited by 21
Chinnam, N. B., Syed, A., Hura, G. L., Hammel, M., Tainer, J. A., & Tsutakawa, S. E. (2022) · Methods in enzymology on CD-ROM/Methods in enzymology · doi:10.1016/bs.mie.2022.09.023 · Cited by 19 · cited 1×
“The use of experimental data, especially SAXS, NMR and cryo-EM, has also been described to guide modeling of ensembles and alternative conformations 71,82,108 .”
Ligand-Capped Cobalt(II) Multiplies the Value of the Double-Histidine Motif for PCS NMR Studies
Zhu, W., Yang, D. T., & Gronenborn, A. M. (2023) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/jacs.2c12021 · Cited by 18 · cited 1×
“A series of AF2 models can be compared with experimental NMR data in the form of distance-and conformation-sensitive structural restraints obtained from NOEs 81 , RDCs 29,86 , paramagnetic relaxation enhancements 87,88 and/or pseudocontact shifts 89 (Fig.”
BackgroundA database of calculated solution parameters for the AlphaFold predicted protein structures
(2022) · doi:10.1038/s41598-022-10607-z · Cited by 17 · cited 1×
“Preliminary comparison of SAXS-derived versus AlphaFold calculated P ( r ) curves revealed that, for many cases, a static AF2 model does not adequately describe solution-state structures 42,72 .”
AlphaFold Protein Structure Database for Sequence-Independent Molecular Replacement
Chai, L., Zhu, P., Chai, J., Pang, C., Andi, B., McSweeney, S., Shanklin, J., & Liu, Q. (2021) · Crystals · doi:10.3390/cryst11101227 · Cited by 15
Residue-level error detection in cryoelectron microscopy models
Reggiano, G., Lugmayr, W., Farrell, D. P., Marlovits, T. C., & DiMaio, F. (2023) · Structure · doi:10.1016/j.str.2023.05.002 · Cited by 14
Chiliveri, S. C., Shen, Y., Baber, J. L., Ying, J., Sagar, V., Wistow, G. J., Anfinrud, P., & Bax, A. (2023) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/jacs.3c05710 · Cited by 13 · cited 3×
“…use of AlphaFold models in molecular replacement can be further enhanced by downweighting or removing low-confidence regions 23 . https://doi.org/10.1038/s41589-024-01638-w Another burgeoning area where AlphaFold models are integrated with experimental data is solution-state NMR 15,27,28,30,81–85 .”
BackgroundInfluentialSedinkin, S. L., Burns, D., Shukla, D., Potoyan, D. A., & Venditti, V. (2023) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/jacs.3c03425 · Cited by 12
Progress toward automated methyl assignments for methyl-TROSY applications
Clay, M. C., Saleh, T., Kamatham, S., Rossi, P., & Kalodimos, C. G. (2022) · Structure · doi:10.1016/j.str.2021.11.009 · Cited by 9 · cited 1×
“Here, NMR assignments for methyl side chain groups can be obtained using only methyl–methyl NOEs obtained from 3D NMR experiments and the atomic coordinates of a structure (or AF2-predicted structure) as input with software such as MAUS, MAGIC and methylFLYA 91,93,94 .”
MethodBlanc, M., Lettl, C., Guérin, J., Vieille, A., Furler, S., Briand-Schumacher, S., Dreier, B., Bergé, C., Plückthun, A., Vadon-Le Goff, S., et al. (2023) · PLOS Pathogens · doi:10.1371/journal.ppat.1011368 · Cited by 9 · cited 1×
“The use of AlphaFold models in structure-determination protocols has been shown to reduce the time and effort required relative to ab initio model building 68–70 .”
MethodOuter membrane β‐barrel structure prediction through the lens of AlphaFold2
Topitsch, A., Schwede, T., & Pereira, J. (2024) · Proteins: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics · doi:10.1002/prot.26552 · Cited by 9 · cited 1×
“Furthermore, membrane proteins represent less than 3% of total structures in the PDB 15 , meaning that the training set used by AF2 was highly biased toward soluble proteins 39 .”
BackgroundAbdollahi, H., Prestegard, J. H., & Valafar, H. (2023) · Current Opinion in Structural Biology · doi:10.1016/j.sbi.2023.102655 · Cited by 8 · cited 1×
“The use of experimental data, especially SAXS, NMR and cryo-EM, has also been described to guide modeling of ensembles and alternative conformations 71,82,108 .”
MethodBlind Assessment of Monomeric AlphaFold2 Protein Structure Models with Experimental NMR DataPreprint
Li, E. H., Spaman, L. E., Tejero, R., Huang, Y. J., Ramelot, T. A., Fraga, K. J., Prestegard, J. H., Kennedy, M. A., & Montelione, G. T. (2023) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/2023.01.22.525096 · Cited by 8
de la Torre, A., & Pérez-Martín, J. (2022) · PLOS Genetics · doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1010483 · Cited by 5
Appraisal of AlphaFold2-Predicted Models in Cryo-EM Map Interpretation
Alshammari, M., He, J., & Wriggers, W. (2023) · Microscopy and Microanalysis · doi:10.1093/micmic/ozad067.489 · Cited by 1 · cited 1×
“Reports suggest that AF2 models should not be fit into cryo-EM maps with resolution greater than 6 Å 98,99 .”
Background
Research works printed but not linked: 6
- Bertoline, L. M. F., Lima, A. N., Krieger, J. E. & Teixeira, S. K. Before and after AlphaFold2: an overview of protein structure prediction. Front. Bioinform. 3, 1120370 (2023).
- Zhao, B., Ghadermarzi, S. & Kurgan, L. Comparative evaluation of AlphaFold2 and disorder predictors for prediction of intrinsic disorder, disorder content and fully disordered proteins. Comput. Struct. Biotechnol. J. 21, 3248–3258 (2023).
- McShan, A. C. Utility of methyl side chain probes for solution NMR studies of large proteins. J. Magn. Reson. Open 14–15, 100087 (2023).
- Ruschak, A. M. & Kay, L. E. Methyl groups as probes of supra-molecular structure, dynamics and function. J. Biomol. NMR 46, 75–87 (2009).
- Dai, X., Wu, L., Yoo, S. & Liu, Q. Integrating AlphaFold and deep learning for atomistic interpretation of cryo-EM maps. Brief. Bioinform. 24, bbad405 (2023).
- Johansson-Åkhe, I. & Wallner, B. Improving peptide–protein docking with AlphaFold-Multimer using forced sampling. Front. Bioinform. 2, 959160 (2022).
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Protein structure prediction via deep learning: an in-depth review
Meng, Y., Zhang, Z., Zhou, C., Tang, X., Hu, X., Tian, G., Yang, J., & Yao, Y. (2025) · Frontiers in Pharmacology · doi:10.3389/fphar.2025.1498662 · Cited by 52
Lee, M., Schafer, J. W., Prabakaran, J., Chakravarty, D., Clore, M. F., & Porter, L. L. (2025) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-025-60759-5 · Cited by 38
“I believe the revised manuscript is now well-positioned for publication.”
Integrating AlphaFold pLDDT Scores into CABS-flex for enhanced protein flexibility simulations
Wróblewski, K., & Kmiecik, S. (2024) · Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal · doi:10.1016/j.csbj.2024.11.047 · Cited by 30
“By using pLDDT scores to identify regions of low confidence, these regions can be targeted in MD simulations to explore potential alternative conformations or to better understand the dynamic behavior of flexible regions [2,8].”
AlphaFold and what is next: bridging functional, systems and structural biology
Szczepski, K., & Jaremko, Ł. (2025) · Expert Review of Proteomics · doi:10.1080/14789450.2025.2456046 · Cited by 25
“…regions display incorrect secondary, tertiary, or quaternary structures; (2) examples of backbone structure side chain rotamer or individual domain structures are accurate but misaligned relative to each other; and (3) instances where even high-confidence regions are still inaccurate [37].”
Structural basis for the dynamic regulation of mTORC1 by amino acids
Valenstein, M. L., Wranik, M., Lalgudi, P. V., Linde-Garelli, K. Y., Choi, Y., Chivukula, R. R., Sabatini, D. M., & Rogala, K. B. (2025) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-025-09428-7 · Cited by 24
Metadata
- Authors
- Agarwal, V., & McShan, A. C.
- Affiliations
- Georgia Institute of Technology (US)
- Corresponding author
- Agarwal, Vinayak
- McShan, Andrew C.
- Venue
- Nature Chemical Biology
- Published
- 2024-06-21
- Volume
- 20
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 950-959
- ISSN
- 1552-4450 (ISSN-L)
- 1552-4469
- PMC
- PMC11956457
- OpenAlex
- W4399893066
- Cited by
- 155
- References
- 112
- Citations by year
- 2026: 79 · 2025: 63 · 2024: 13
- FWCI
- 6.31
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Licence
- Locations
- Nature Chemical Biology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion, other-oa)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- Funders
- U.S. Department of Health & Human Services | NIH | National Institute of General Medical Sciences (R35GM142882)
- National Science Foundation (CHE-2238650)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Structural Biology › Enzyme Structure and Function
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Machine Learning in Bioinformatics
- Keywords
- AlphaFold2, protein structure prediction, intrinsically disordered proteins, conformational ensembles, model reliability, pLDDT, small-angle X-ray scattering, solution NMR, cryo-electron microscopy, X-ray diffraction
- MeSH terms
- Artificial Intelligence, Humans, Models, Molecular, Protein Conformation, Proteins, X-Ray Diffraction, Protein Folding, Cryoelectron Microscopy, Scattering, Small Angle
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-10-07, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).
A second model labelled each claim on 2026-10-07 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).
Cited sources are checked with a language model’s help (gpt-6-sol).
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review