Cited by 818

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 15 of the 15 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Sirt1 protects against high-fat diet-induced metabolic damage

Pfluger, Paul T., Herranz, Daniel, Velasco-Miguel, Susana, Serrano, Manuel, Tschöp, Matthias H.·2008·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

The identification of new pharmacological approaches to effectively prevent, treat, and cure the metabolic syndrome is of crucial importance. Excessive exposure to dietary lipids causes inflammatory responses, deranges the homeostasis of cellular metabolism, and is believed to constitute a key initiator of the metabolic syndrome. Mammalian Sirt1 is a protein deacetylase that has been involved in resveratrol-mediated protection from high-fat diet-induced metabolic damage, but direct proof for the implication of Sirt1 has remained elusive. Here, we report that mice with moderate overexpression of Sirt1 under the control of its natural promoter exhibit fat mass gain similar to wild-type controls when exposed to a high-fat diet. Higher energy expenditure appears to be compensated by a parallel increase in food intake. Interestingly, transgenic Sirt1 mice under a high-fat diet show lower lipid-induced inflammation along with better glucose tolerance, and are almost entirely protected from hepatic steatosis. We present data indicating that such beneficial effects of Sirt1 are due to at least two mechanisms: induction of antioxidant proteins MnSOD and Nrf1, possibly via stimulation of PGC1α, and lower activation of proinflammatory cytokines, such as TNFα and IL-6, via down-modulation of NFκB activity. Together, these results provide direct proof of the protective potential of Sirt1 against the metabolic consequences of chronic exposure to a high-fat diet.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.0802917105

Cites

15 of 15 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Knockdown or knockout of SIRT1 in the mouse liver or transgenic overexpression of SIRT1 in mice results in altered lipid/cholesterol levels in serum and the liver.

    “knockdown or knockout of SIRT1 in the mouse liver or transgenic overexpression of SIRT1 in mice results in altered lipid/cholesterol levels in serum and the liver (Li et al. 2007;Rodgers and Puigserver 2007;Pfluger et al. 2008;Erion et al. 2009;Purushotham et al. 2009).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 28

  1. 10.1210/er.2006-0041 · DOI
  2. 10.1038/nrd2136 · DOI
  3. 10.1016/j.cell.2007.04.001 · DOI
  4. 10.1161/01.ATV.0000251608.09329.9a · DOI
  5. 10.2337/db06-1595 · DOI · Paper page
  6. 10.1038/nm1206-1359 · DOI
  7. 10.1038/nature02583 · DOI
  8. 10.1016/j.febslet.2007.11.034 · DOI · Paper page
  9. 10.1023/A:1008918913249 · DOI
  10. 10.1007/s00018-006-6192-6 · DOI
  11. 10.1073/pnas.1934713100 · DOI · Paper page
  12. 10.1038/ncpendmet0505 · DOI
  13. 10.1016/j.drudis.2007.07.009 · DOI
  14. 10.2337/diacare.27.8.2057 · DOI
  15. 10.1038/ncb1483 · DOI
  16. 10.4049/jimmunol.173.9.5786 · DOI
  17. 10.1172/JCI27392 · DOI
  18. 10.1016/j.cell.2006.09.024 · DOI · Paper page
  19. 10.1038/nrd2060 · DOI · Paper page
  20. 10.1016/j.cmet.2005.07.001 · DOI
  21. 10.1161/01.RES.0000267723.65696.4a · DOI · Paper page
  22. 10.1111/j.1474-9726.2007.00335.x · DOI · Paper page
  23. 10.1002/hep.21874 · DOI
  24. 10.1073/pnas.0500660102 · DOI
  25. 10.1053/j.gastro.2007.03.059 · DOI · Paper page
  26. 10.1053/j.gastro.2006.10.014 · DOI
  27. 10.1073/pnas.0702509104 · DOI · Paper page
  28. 10.1016/j.cmet.2007.08.014 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Pfluger, P. T., Herranz, D., Velasco-Miguel, S., Serrano, M., & Tschöp, M. H.
Affiliations
  • *Department of Psychiatry, Obesity Research Center, Genome Research Institute, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, OH 45237; and
  • Spanish National Cancer Research Center (CNIO), 28029 Madrid, Spain
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2008-07-15
Volume
105
Issue
28
Pages
9793-9798
ISSN
  • 0027-8424
  • 1091-6490
Cited by
818
References
15
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review