Cited by 1,415Substance Abuse Treatment and OutcomesNeurotransmitter Receptor Influence on BehaviorNeural and Behavioral Psychology Studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 70 of the 70 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Impulsivity as a determinant and consequence of drug use: a review of underlying processes

Open access
de Wit, Harriet·2009·Addiction Biology

Abstract

Impulsive behaviors are closely linked to drug use and abuse, both as contributors to use and as consequences of use. Trait impulsivity is an important determinant of drug use during development, and in adults momentary ‘state’ increases in impulsive behavior may increase the likelihood of drug use, especially in individuals attempting to abstain. Conversely, acute and chronic effects of drug use may increase impulsive behaviors, which may in turn facilitate further drug use. However, these effects depend on the behavioral measure used to assess impulsivity. This article reviews data from controlled studies investigating different measures of impulsive behaviors, including delay discounting, behavioral inhibition and a newly proposed measure of inattention. Our findings support the hypothesis that drugs of abuse alter performance across independent behavioral measures of impulsivity. The findings lay the groundwork for studying the cognitive and neurobiological substrates of impulsivity, and for future studies on the role of impulsive behavior as both facilitator and a result of drug use.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1369-1600.2008.00129.x

Cites

70 of 70 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 67 references

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. de Wit H, Impulsivity: Theory, Science, and Neuroscience of Discounting

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
de Wit, H.
Venue
Addiction Biology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2008-12-04
Volume
14
Issue
1
Pages
22-31
ISSN
  • 1355-6215 (ISSN-L)
  • 1369-1600
OpenAlex
W2118475046
Cited by
1,415
References
67
Citations by year
2026: 43 · 2025: 57 · 2024: 54 · 2023: 59 · 2022: 54 · 2021: 70 · 2020: 96 · 2019: 100 · 2018: 120 · 2017: 94 · 2016: 125 · 2015: 100 · 2014: 105 · 2013: 118 · 2012: 80
FWCI
4.98
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Addiction Biology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institute on Drug Abuse (R01DA009133, DA09133)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
Keywords
impulsivity, drug use, drug abuse, trait impulsivity, state impulsivity, delay discounting, behavioral inhibition, inattention, addiction
MeSH terms
Adult, Attention, Brain, Character, Cognition, Humans, Impulsive Behavior, Inhibition, Psychological, Motivation, Reward, Illicit Drugs, Controlled Clinical Trials as Topic, Substance-Related Disorders

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review