Cited by 386Stress Responses and CortisolChild and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional DevelopmentChild Abuse and Trauma

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 101 of the 101 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; none of the 91 sources its claims cite is checked for support yet.

Stress and the Development of Self-Regulation in Context

Open access
Blair, Clancy·2010·Child Development Perspectives

Abstract

This article considers the effects of psychosocial stress on child development and describes mechanisms through which early stress in the context of poverty affects the functioning of neural networks that underlie executive functions and self-regulation. It examines the effects of early experience on glucocorticoid and catecholamine levels that influence neural activity in areas of the brain associated with executive functions, primarily as studied in animal models. Finally, it considers the strengths and limitations of this research, its relevance to understanding stress reactivity from the perspective of biological sensitivity to context, and the implications for the study of risk and resilience processes and early intervention to prevent developmental delays.

Overview

AI snapshot

Written from the paper’s full text.

TL;DR

This review argues that early psychosocial stress, especially in poverty, can shape stress-response systems and prefrontal-limbic circuitry underlying executive function and self-regulation. It emphasizes that stress reactivity is not inherently harmful; outcomes depend on the quality of caregiving and context.

Key findings

  • Animal models show that chronic prenatal or early neonatal stress increases stress reactivity and disrupts regulation of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis, with effects on limbic structures and prefrontal cortex areas important for executive functions and self-regulation.
  • Glucocorticoid and catecholamine levels follow an inverted-U relationship with executive functions: moderate increases support executive function, while very high or very low levels are linked to deficits; this parallels the Yerkes-Dodson arousal-performance principle for complex tasks.
  • Context determines whether high reactivity is beneficial or risky: supportive, resource-rich caregiving is associated with better-regulated stress physiology and reflective self-regulation, whereas low-support, unpredictable environments are associated with reactive behavior and poorer self-regulation.
  • In a predominantly low-income longitudinal sample, infants whose mothers were highly sensitive had lower baseline cortisol and lower cortisol reactivity at 7 months, and reduced overall cortisol at 15 months; animal enrichment studies show behavioral and cognitive reversal of early stress effects, though not always matching neural changes.

Methods

  • This is a conceptual review, not a new empirical study; it synthesizes animal-model and human research on stress, caregiving, poverty, brain development, and self-regulation.
  • The main analysis is narrative integration of findings on HPA-axis function, glucocorticoid and catecholamine effects on prefrontal cortex, executive function, differential susceptibility, biological sensitivity to context, and early intervention.
  • Human evidence discussed includes studies of children in poverty and a longitudinal low-income sample with cortisol measures at 7 and 15 months.

Limitations

  • The author states that although animal models are compelling because of their specificity and control, the extent to which their neural and physiological mechanisms operate in human populations remains uncertain, and human development involves broader and more diverse influences.
  • The author notes additional influences on neural plasticity beyond early care, including enriched-environment activity and genetic background, and calls for gene-environment and epigenetic research.
  • Evident from the text: catecholamine–executive function relations in children have not been demonstrated because noninvasive assessment is difficult; whether chronic early stress affects children’s stress-response systems to the same degree as in animal models is not yet established.

Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1750-8606.2010.00145.x

Cites

101 of 101 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

54 Not checked yet · 22 Own interpretation · 4 No basis given · 2 Sources not found

Verify all 89 references — free account

Show all 57 claims

  • It may state two separate claims as one. 23
  • Probably not a substantial claim. 2
25 of 25
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Findings from animal models about early stress, prefrontal connectivity, and executive functions can be generalized to human children.

    “Relations among early experience, PFC connectivity, and EFs demonstrated in animal models are important for child development research in that EFs describe information processing abilities that allow for actively maintaining and processing task-relevant information in working memory”
    “Although early rearing environments for children differ in many ways from those of rats, the caregiving environment for children facing low SES is more likely than typical home environments to be disorganized and lacking in appropriate stimulation and support”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Early life stress is more frequent in poverty.

    “early life stress, which is more frequent in the context of poverty”
2 of 2

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.

1 of 1

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Barnard, 1997, The effectiveness of early intervention, 249
  2. Bryant, 1997, The effectiveness of early intervention, 23
  3. Ramey, 1991, Children in poverty, 190
  4. Zelazo, 2002, Handbook of childhood cognitive development, 445

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 386

Metadata

Authors
Blair, C.
Affiliations
New York University (US)
Corresponding author
Blair, Clancy
Venue
Child Development Perspectives
Published
2010-11-15
Volume
4
Issue
3
Pages
181-188
ISSN
  • 1750-8592 (ISSN-L)
  • 1750-8606
OpenAlex
W1509600221
Cited by
379
References
101
Citations by year
2026: 14 · 2025: 23 · 2024: 23 · 2023: 27 · 2022: 33 · 2021: 22 · 2020: 36 · 2019: 28 · 2018: 18 · 2017: 33 · 2016: 25 · 2015: 26 · 2014: 19 · 2013: 15 · 2012: 24
FWCI
6.89
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Child Development Perspectives (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (P01HD039667, R03HD039750, R01HD051502)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Behavioral Neuroscience › Stress Responses and Cortisol
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child Abuse and Trauma
Keywords
psychosocial stress, child development, self-regulation, executive function, poverty, glucocorticoids, catecholamines, artificial neural networks, stress reactivity, risk and resilience, developmental delay prevention, early intervention

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-10-06, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).

A second model labelled each claim on 2026-10-06 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review