Cited by 262Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration MechanismsNeurological Disease Mechanisms and TreatmentsAlzheimer's disease research and treatments

Microglia and the aging brain: are senescent microglia the key to neurodegeneration?

Open access
Angelova, Dafina M., Brown, David R.·2019·Journal of Neurochemistry

Abstract

The single largest risk factor for etiology of neurodegenerative diseases like Alzheimer’s disease is increased age. Therefore, understanding the changes that occur as a result of aging is central to any possible prevention or cure for such conditions. Microglia, the resident brain glial population most associated with both protection of neurons in health and their destruction is disease, could be a significant player in age related changes. Microglia can adopt an aberrant phenotype sometimes referred to either as dystrophic or senescent. While aged microglia have been frequently identified in neurodegenerative diseases such as Alzheimer’s disease, there is no conclusive evidence that proves a causal role. This has been hampered by a lack of models of aged microglia. We have recently generated a model of senescent microglia based on the observation that all dystrophic microglia show iron overload. Iron‐overloading cultured microglia causes them to take on a senescent phenotype and can cause changes in models of neurodegeneration similar to those observed in patients. This review considers how this model could be used to determine the role of senescent microglia in neurodegenerative diseases. image

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/jnc.14860

Cites

142 of 142 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Angelova, D. M., & Brown, D. R.
Affiliations
University of Bath (GB)
Corresponding author
Brown, David R.
Venue
Journal of Neurochemistry
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2019-10-20
Volume
151
Issue
6
Pages
676-688
ISSN
  • 0022-3042 (ISSN-L)
  • 1471-4159
OpenAlex
W2971440202
Cited by
262
References
142
Citations by year
2026: 24 · 2025: 34 · 2024: 39 · 2023: 49 · 2022: 54 · 2021: 41 · 2020: 20 · 2019: 1
FWCI
3.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Neurochemistry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Pure (University of Bath) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
BRACE
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Neurological Disease Mechanisms and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
Keywords
microglia, microglial senescence, brain aging, neurodegeneration, Alzheimer's disease, iron overload, age-related risk factors
MeSH terms
Aging, Animals, Brain, Humans, Neurons, Cellular Senescence, Microglia, Neurodegenerative Diseases

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review