Cited by 797TGF-β signaling in diseasesDevelopmental Biology and Gene RegulationSignaling Pathways in Disease

Specificity, versatility, and control of TGF-β family signaling

Open access
Derynck, Rik, Budi, Erine H.·2019·Science Signaling

Abstract

Molecular function and pathway cross-talk in TGF-β signaling reveal its complexity and open questions.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1126/scisignal.aav5183

Cites

346 of 346 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Neutralizing TGF-β antibodies need to effectively interfere with the very high binding affinity (10−11 M range) of TGF-β to cell surface receptor complexes.

    “they need to effectively interfere with the very high binding affinity (10−11 M range) of TGF-β to cell surface receptor complexes65.”

    From TGFβ biology in cancer progression and immunotherapy (2021) · cites this paper as [65]

  • By design, TβRII ligand trap-based chimeras should sequester TGF-β1 and TGF-β3 only, similarly to dimerized TβRII receptor.

    “By design, these chimeras, based on the TβRII ligand trap, should sequester TGF-β1 and -β3 only, similarly to dimerized TβRII receptor65.”

    From TGFβ biology in cancer progression and immunotherapy (2021) · cites this paper as [65]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 347 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [1]Derynck R, Miyazono K, The Biology of the TGF-β Family. (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, New York, ed. Derynck Rik, Miyazono Kohei 2016), pp. 1164.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Derynck, R., & Budi, E. H.
Affiliations
University of California, San Francisco (US)
Corresponding author
Derynck, Rik
Venue
Science Signaling
Published
2019-02-26
Volume
12
Issue
570
ISSN
  • 1937-9145 (ISSN-L)
  • 1945-0877
OpenAlex
W2917714624
Cited by
785
References
347
Citations by year
2026: 83 · 2025: 85 · 2024: 129 · 2023: 118 · 2022: 102 · 2021: 152 · 2020: 77 · 2019: 35 · 2018: 1
FWCI
8.08
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Science Signaling (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Cancer Institute (RO1-CA63101, RO1-CA136690)
  • JDRF (3-APF-2017-392-A-N)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › TGF-β signaling in diseases
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Developmental Biology and Gene Regulation
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Signaling Pathways in Disease
Keywords
Smad proteins, TGF-beta receptor, dual-specificity kinase, signaling crosstalk, non-Smad signaling, cancer, fibrosis, developmental anomalies
MeSH terms
Animals, Cell Differentiation, Gene Expression Regulation, Humans, Ligands, Neoplasms, Protein Binding, Signal Transduction, Transforming Growth Factor beta, Receptors, Transforming Growth Factor beta

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review