Cited by 342

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 21 of the 21 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Estrogen Shapes Dopamine-Dependent Cognitive Processes: Implications for Women's Health

Jacobs, Emily, D'Esposito, Mark·2011·The Journal of Neuroscience

Abstract

The prefrontal cortex (PFC) is exquisitely sensitive to its neurochemical environment. Minor fluctuations in cortical dopamine (DA) can profoundly alter working memory, a PFC-dependent cognitive function that supports an array of essential human behaviors. Dopamine's action in the PFC follows an inverted U-shaped curve, where an optimal DA level results in maximal function and insufficient or excessive DA impairs PFC function. In animals, 17β-estradiol (the major estrogen in most mammals, referred to henceforth as estradiol) has been shown to enhance DA activity, yet no human study has adequately addressed whether estradiol's impact on cognition occurs by way of modulating specific neurochemical systems. Here we examined the effects of endogenous fluctuations in estradiol on working memory in healthy young women as a function of baseline PFC DA [indexed by catechol-O-methyltransferase (COMT) Val 158 Met genotype and, at a finer scale, COMT enzyme activity]. The results demonstrate that estradiol status impacts working memory function and, crucially, the direction of the effect depends on indices of baseline DA. Moreover, consistent with a DA cortical efficiency hypothesis, functional MRI revealed that inferred optimal DA was associated with reduced PFC activity sustained across task blocks and selectively enhanced PFC activity on trials with the greatest demand for cognitive control. The magnitude of PFC activity during high control trials was predictive of an individual's performance. These findings show that although estrogen, considered in isolation, may have unpredictable effects on cognitive performance, its influence is clarified when considered within a larger neuromodulatory framework. Given the clinical prevalence of dopaminergic drugs, understanding the relationship between estrogen and DA is essential for advancing women's health.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1523/jneurosci.6394-10.2011

Cites

21 of 21 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 21 references

Research works printed but not linked: 63

  1. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2097-04.2005 · DOI
  2. 10.1038/sj.npp.1301227 · DOI · Paper page
  3. 10.1093/cercor/bhq083 · DOI
  4. 10.1037/0033-2909.130.4.553 · DOI · Paper page
  5. 10.1016/0304-3940(90)90618-J · DOI
  6. Becker JB (2000) in Neuronal and cognitive effects of oestrogens, Oestrogen effects on dopaminergic function in striatum, eds Chadwick DJ Goode JA (Wiley, West Sussex, England), pp 134–145. · DOI
  7. 10.1016/j.yfrne.2007.07.003 · DOI · Paper page
  8. 10.1016/0028-3932(68)90038-9 · DOI
  9. 10.1016/0960-0760(95)00179-4 · DOI
  10. 10.1006/nimg.1996.0247 · DOI · Paper page
  11. Cai, 1997, Dose-dependent effects of the dopamine D1 receptor agonists A77636 or SKF81297 on spatial working memory in aged monkeys, J Pharmacol Exp Ther, 283, 183, 10.1016/S0022-3565(24)36983-6 · DOI · Paper page
  12. 10.1016/j.tips.2004.03.011 · DOI
  13. 10.1086/425589 · DOI · Paper page
  14. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0601-07.2007 · DOI
  15. 10.1016/j.biopsych.2007.03.001 · DOI · Paper page
  16. 10.1002/cne.10207 · DOI
  17. 10.1016/j.biopsych.2006.03.004 · DOI
  18. 10.1016/S0022-5371(80)90312-6 · DOI · Paper page
  19. 10.1006/hbeh.2000.1625 · DOI
  20. 10.1016/S0893-6080(02)00049-7 · DOI
  21. 10.1073/pnas.111134598 · DOI
  22. 10.1001/archpsyc.59.9.851 · DOI
  23. 10.1007/s00213-001-0944-7 · DOI
  24. 10.1016/j.psyneuen.2008.04.007 · DOI
  25. 10.3758/CABN.5.2.212 · DOI · Paper page
  26. Gibbs, 2005, A functional MRI study of the effects of bromocriptine, a dopamine receptor agonist, on component processes of working memory, Psychopharmacology, 180, 644, 10.1007/s00213-005-0077-5 · DOI · Paper page
  27. 10.1016/S0165-1781(02)00028-8 · DOI
  28. Granon, 2000, Enhanced and impaired attentional performance after infusion of D1 dopaminergic receptor agents into rat prefrontal cortex, J Neurosci, 20, 1208, 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.20-03-01208.2000 · DOI · Paper page
  29. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3440-05.2006 · DOI
  30. 10.1046/j.0953-816x.2001.01856.x · DOI
  31. 10.1007/s002130051033 · DOI · Paper page
  32. 10.1016/S0091-3057(00)00218-5 · DOI
  33. 10.1097/00001756-199711100-00032 · DOI · Paper page
  34. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2637-08.2008 · DOI
  35. 10.1002/(SICI)1096-9861(19980525)395:1<1::AID-CNE1>3.0.CO;2-4 · DOI
  36. Laruelle, 2000, Imaging synaptic neurotransmission with in vivo binding competition techniques: a critical review, J Cereb Blood Flow Metab, 20, 423, 10.1097/00004647-200003000-00001 · DOI · Paper page
  37. 10.1016/S0893-133X(99)00070-6 · DOI · Paper page
  38. 10.1007/BF02246017 · DOI
  39. 10.1007/s00213-002-1183-2 · DOI
  40. Männistö, 1999, Catechol-O-methyltransferase (COMT): biochemistry, molecular biology, pharmacology and clinical efficacy of the new selective COMT inhibitors, Pharmacol Rev, 51, 593, 10.1016/S0031-6997(24)01423-6 · DOI · Paper page
  41. 10.1016/S0166-2236(02)02182-3 · DOI
  42. 10.1046/j.1471-4159.1995.65041651.x · DOI
  43. 10.1002/1097-4679(199511)51:6<768::AID-JCLP2270510607>3.0.CO;2-1 · DOI · Paper page
  44. 10.1176/appi.ajp.158.7.1105 · DOI
  45. 10.1017/S1355617704105110 · DOI
  46. 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2005.03.055 · DOI
  47. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4653-03.2004 · DOI
  48. Rapp, 2003, Cyclic estrogen replacement improves cognitive function in aged ovariectomized rhesus monkeys, J Neurosci, 23, 5708, 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.23-13-05708.2003 · DOI
  49. 10.1016/S0306-4530(01)00083-X · DOI · Paper page
  50. 10.1037/0012-1649.27.5.763 · DOI · Paper page
  51. 10.1037/a0014685 · DOI
  52. 10.1016/j.yhbeh.2004.12.002 · DOI
  53. 10.1046/j.1471-4159.1994.62051750.x · DOI · Paper page
  54. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1124-04.2004 · DOI
  55. 10.1016/j.biopsych.2005.10.024 · DOI
  56. 10.3758/BF03192720 · DOI · Paper page
  57. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3192-10.2010 · DOI
  58. Watanabe, 1997, Increase of extracellular dopamine in primate prefrontal cortex during a working memory task, J Neurophysiol, 78, 2795, 10.1152/jn.1997.78.5.2795 · DOI
  59. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0774-07.2007 · DOI
  60. 10.1016/j.tins.2004.08.002 · DOI
  61. 10.1006/nimg.1995.1023 · DOI
  62. 10.1016/0304-3940(94)90510-X · DOI
  63. Zahrt, 1997, Supranormal stimulation of D1 dopamine receptors in the rodent prefrontal cortex impairs spatial working memory performance, J Neurosci, 17, 8528, 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.17-21-08528.1997 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Jacobs, E., & D'Esposito, M.
Venue
The Journal of Neuroscience
Published
2011-04-06
Volume
31
Issue
14
Pages
5286-5293
ISSN
  • 0270-6474
  • 1529-2401
Cited by
342
References
21
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review