Cited by 4,688Education, Achievement, and GiftednessInnovative Teaching and Learning MethodsCareer Development and Diversity

Self-Efficacy Beliefs in Academic Settings

Pajares, Frank·1996·Review of Educational Research

Abstract

The purpose of this article is to examine the contribution made by the self-efficacy component of Bandura’s (1986) social cognitive theory to the study of self-regulation and motivation in academic settings. The difference between self-efficacy beliefs and other expectancy constructs is first explained, followed by a brief overview of problems in self-efficacy research. Findings on the relationship between self-efficacy, motivation constructs, and academic performances are then summarized. These findings demonstrate that particularized measures of self-efficacy that correspond to the criterial tasks with which they are compared surpass global measures in the explanation and prediction of related outcomes. The conceptual difference between the definition and use of expectancy beliefs in social cognitive theory and in expectancy value and self-concept theory is then clarified. Last, strategies to guide future research are offered.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/1170653

Cites

155 of 155 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

7 of the 162 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Pajares, F.
Affiliations
Emory University (US)
Corresponding author
Pajares, Frank
Venue
Review of Educational Research
Published
1996
Volume
66
Issue
4
Pages
543
ISSN
0034-6543 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2103080710
Cited by
4,688
References
162
Citations by year
2026: 182 · 2025: 195 · 2024: 195 · 2023: 233 · 2022: 246 · 2021: 215 · 2020: 284 · 2019: 273 · 2018: 235 · 2017: 243 · 2016: 247 · 2015: 228 · 2014: 221 · 2013: 261 · 2012: 226
FWCI
40.69
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Review of Educational Research (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Education, Achievement, and Giftedness
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Career Development and Diversity
Keywords
self-efficacy, social cognitive theory, self-regulation, academic motivation, academic performance, expectancy beliefs, self-concept theory, expectancy value

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review