Cited by 1,418Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on BehaviorNeural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesNeuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research

The mysterious motivational functions of mesolimbic dopamine

Open access
Salamone, John D., Correa, Mercè·2012·Neuron

Abstract

Nucleus accumbens dopamine is known to play a role in motivational processes, and dysfunctions of mesolimbic dopamine may contribute to motivational symptoms of depression and other disorders, as well as features of substance abuse. Although it has become traditional to label dopamine neurons as "reward" neurons, this is an overgeneralization, and it is important to distinguish between aspects of motivation that are differentially affected by dopaminergic manipulations. For example, accumbens dopamine does not mediate primary food motivation or appetite, but is involved in appetitive and aversive motivational processes including behavioral activation, exertion of effort, approach behavior, sustained task engagement, Pavlovian processes, and instrumental learning. In this review, we discuss the complex roles of dopamine in behavioral functions related to motivation.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.neuron.2012.10.021

Cites

207 of 207 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • VTA-DA neurons play a central role in governing processes related to learning and the formation of memories associated with hedonic and motivational rewards.

    “VTA-DA neurons play a central role in governing processes related to learning and the formation of memories associated with hedonic and motivational rewards (Rossato et al., 2009; Salamone and Correa, 2012; Wise, 2004).”

    From Convergence of oxytocin and dopamine signalling in neuronal circuits: Insights into the neurobiology of social interactions across species (2024) · cites this paper as Salamone and Correa, 2012

    The Summary and Conclusions (page unavailable) supports a role for mesolimbic dopamine in specific motivational and learning processes, and the Appetitive Instrumental Learning section reports that VTA dopamine-neuron stimulation can promote acquisition of food-reinforced responding. But the paper does not establish a central role in forming reward-related memories; it also cautions against equating dopamine with hedonia and says accumbens dopamine does not directly mediate hedonic reactions. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Incentive motivation for rewards depends on dopaminergic neurotransmission in the nucleus accumbens.

    “It is well-known that incentive motivation for rewards depends on dopaminergic neurotransmission in the nucleus accumbens (Salamone et al. 2012).”

    From Neurexin1α knockout in rats causes aberrant social behaviour: relevance for autism and schizophrenia (2025) · cites this paper as Salamone et al. 2012

    The Summary and Conclusions (page not provided) says nucleus accumbens dopamine is important for aspects of appetitive motivation, including effort and cue-instigated approach. But the paper stresses that dopamine is critical for some motivational functions and not others; it does not support the unqualified claim that incentive motivation for rewards depends on it. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Amygdala and ACC inactivations caused changes to behaviour during a cognitive effort task that were different from those in physical effort tasks.

    “Specifically, amygdala and ACC inactivations caused changes to behaviour during a cognitive effort task [27] that were different to those in physical effort tasks [2, 25, 26].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Salamone, J. D., & Correa, M.
Affiliations
  • University of Connecticut (US)
  • Universitat Jaume I (ES)
Corresponding author
Salamone, John D.
Venue
Neuron
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2012-11
Volume
76
Issue
3
Pages
470-485
ISSN
0896-6273 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2114520249
Cited by
1,418
References
207
Citations by year
2026: 99 · 2025: 85 · 2024: 95 · 2023: 93 · 2022: 93 · 2021: 100 · 2020: 125 · 2019: 105 · 2018: 131 · 2017: 91 · 2016: 112 · 2015: 117 · 2014: 109 · 2013: 63
FWCI
9.74
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Neuron (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • Repositori UJI (Universitat Jaume I) (submittedVersion, public-domain)
Funders
National Institute of Mental Health (R03MH094966, R01MH078023)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
Keywords
mesolimbic dopamine system, nucleus accumbens, motivation, reward, depression, substance abuse, effort, classical conditioning, operant conditioning, behavioral activation, approach behavior, aversive motivation, food motivation
MeSH terms
Animals, Appetitive Behavior, Dopamine, Humans, Limbic System, Motivation, Nucleus Accumbens

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review