Cited by 2,135Circadian rhythm and melatoninStress Responses and CortisolHypothalamic control of reproductive hormones

Loss of a circadian adrenal corticosterone rhythm following suprachiasmatic lesions in the rat

Moore, Robert Y., Eichler, Victor B.·1972·Brain Research

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/0006-8993(72)90054-6

Cites

10 of 10 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Moore, R. Y., & Eichler, V. B.
Affiliations
University of Chicago (US)
Venue
Brain Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1972-07
Volume
42
Issue
1
Pages
201-206
ISSN
0006-8993 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2078689239
Cited by
2,135
References
10
Citations by year
2026: 35 · 2025: 46 · 2024: 49 · 2023: 59 · 2022: 58 · 2021: 74 · 2020: 60 · 2019: 64 · 2018: 63 · 2017: 69 · 2016: 58 · 2015: 66 · 2014: 79 · 2013: 62 · 2012: 75
FWCI
4.12
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Brain Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Endocrine and Autonomic Systems › Circadian rhythm and melatonin
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Behavioral Neuroscience › Stress Responses and Cortisol
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Hypothalamic control of reproductive hormones
Keywords
circadian rhythm, circadian gene expression, basal ganglia, mammillary bodies, hypothalamic nuclei
MeSH terms
Adrenal Glands, Animals, Circadian Rhythm, Corticosterone, Female, Hypothalamus, Lighting, Optic Chiasm, Optic Nerve, Visual Pathways, Rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review