Cited by 157Circadian rhythm and melatoninSleep and Work-Related FatigueSleep and Wakefulness Research

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 85 of the 85 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Can light make us bright? Effects of light on cognition and sleep

Open access

Abstract

Light elicits robust nonvisual effects on numerous physiological and behavioral variables, such as the human sleep-wake cycle and cognitive performance. Light effects crucially rely on properties such as dose, duration, timing, and wavelength. Recently, the use of methods such as fMRI to assess light effects on nonvisual brain responses has revealed how light can optimize brain function during specific cognitive tasks, especially in tasks of sustained attention. In this chapter, we address two main issues: how light impinges on cognition via consolidation of human sleep-wake cycles; and how light directly impacts on sleep and cognition, in particular in tasks of sustained attention. A thorough understanding of how light affects sleep and cognitive performance may help to improve light settings at home and at the workplace in order to improve well-being.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/b978-0-444-53817-8.00007-4

Cites

85 of 85 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The text we found for this paper looks like another document, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The text we found for this paper looks like another document, so the self-check wasn’t run.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Cajochen, 1999, Dose-response relationship for light intensity and alertness and its ocular and EEG correlates, Sleep Research Online, 2, 517
  2. Sack, 1992, Oral melatonin reverses the alerting effects of nocturnal bright light exposure in humans, Sleep Research, 21, 49

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Chellappa, S. L., Gordijn, M. C. M., & Cajochen, C.
Affiliations
  • Ministry of Education (BR)
  • University of Groningen (NL)
  • University of Basel (CH)
Corresponding author
Gordijn, Marijke C.M.
Venue
Progress in brain research
Publisher
Elsevier
Published
2011
Volume
190
Pages
119-133
ISSN
0079-6123 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2158444499
Cited by
157
References
85
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 1
FWCI
10.69
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
Licence
other-oa
Locations
  • Progress in brain research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • ePrints Soton (University of Southampton) (submittedVersion)
  • Open Repository and Bibliography (University of Liège) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Endocrine and Autonomic Systems › Circadian rhythm and melatonin
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and Work-Related Fatigue
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Sleep and Wakefulness Research
Keywords
sleep-wake cycle, sleep consolidation, sustained attention, cognitive performance, light wavelength, workplace lighting, home lighting, well-being
MeSH terms
Animals, Biological Clocks, Circadian Rhythm, Cognition, Humans, Light, Sleep, Visual Perception, Wakefulness

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review