Cited by 1,790SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 ResearchCOVID-19 Clinical Research StudiesImmune responses and vaccinations

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 77 of the 77 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Antigen-Specific Adaptive Immunity to SARS-CoV-2 in Acute COVID-19 and Associations with Age and Disease Severity

Open access

Abstract

Limited knowledge is available on the relationship between antigen-specific immune responses and COVID-19 disease severity. We completed a combined examination of all three branches of adaptive immunity at the level of SARS-CoV-2-specific CD4 + and CD8 + T cell and neutralizing antibody responses in acute and convalescent subjects. SARS-CoV-2-specific CD4 + and CD8 + T cells were each associated with milder disease. Coordinated SARS-CoV-2-specific adaptive immune responses were associated with milder disease, suggesting roles for both CD4 + and CD8 + T cells in protective immunity in COVID-19. Notably, coordination of SARS-CoV-2 antigen-specific responses was disrupted in individuals ≥ 65 years old. Scarcity of naive T cells was also associated with aging and poor disease outcomes. A parsimonious explanation is that coordinated CD4 + T cell, CD8 + T cell, and antibody responses are protective, but uncoordinated responses frequently fail to control disease, with a connection between aging and impaired adaptive immune responses to SARS-CoV-2.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.cell.2020.09.038

Cites

77 of 77 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Figures

Graphical abstract
Graphical abstract CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure S1 SARS-CoV-2 Antibody Responses, Related to Figure 1 (A) Frequency of Peak Disease Severity (1-10) for acute and convalescent COVID-19. (B-J) Plasma ELISA curves for SARS-CoV-2 spike RBD (B) IgG, (C) IgA, (D) IgM; SARS-CoV-2 Spike (E) IgG, (F) IgA, (G) IgM; and SARS-CoV-2 Nucleocapsid (N) protein (H) IgG, (I) IgA, and (J) IgM. C92 and C98 are representative acute donors. Grey lines = all other COVID-19 samples. The dotted line indicates LOD. (K) Correlation of Spike IgA with RBD IgA. (L) Correlation of N IgA with Spike IgA. (M) Correlation of PSV neutralizing titer with live neutralizing titer. (N) PSV titration curves. C92 and C98 are representative acute COVID-19 donors. Grey lines = all other COVID-19 samples. (O, P) PSV neutralizing titer correlates with RBD IgA (O) and RBD IgG+IgA (P). In (K-M) and (O-P), white dots = all COVID-19 (acute and convalescent). Statistics reported for all COVID-19 cases.
Figure S1 SARS-CoV-2 Antibody Responses, Related to Figure 1 (A) Frequency of Peak Disease Severity (1-10) for acute and convalescent COVID-19. (B-J) Plasma ELISA curves for SARS-CoV-2 spike RBD (B) IgG, (C) IgA, (D) IgM; SARS-CoV-2 Spike (E) IgG, (F) IgA, (G) IgM; and SARS-CoV-2 Nucleocapsid (N) protein (H) IgG, (I) IgA, and (J) IgM. C92 and C98 are representative acute donors. Grey lines = all other COVID-19 samples. The dotted line indicates LOD. (K) Correlation of Spike IgA with RBD IgA. (L) Correlation of N IgA with Spike IgA. (M) Correlation of PSV neutralizing titer with live neutralizing titer. (N) PSV titration curves. C92 and C98 are representative acute COVID-19 donors. Grey lines = all other COVID-19 samples. (O, P) PSV neutralizing titer correlates with RBD IgA (O) and RBD IgG+IgA (P). In (K-M) and (O-P), white dots = all COVID-19 (acute and convalescent). Statistics reported for all COVID-19 cases.CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 1 SARS-CoV-2 Antibody Responses in COVID-19 Subjects (A–C) Plasma antibody titers to SARS-CoV-2 S RBD (A) IgG, (B) IgA, and (C) IgM, divided into unexposed n = 15, acute (Ac) n = 28, and convalescent (Co) n = 15. (D) SARS-CoV-2 RBD IgG correlates with RBD IgA. (E–G) Plasma ELISA titers to SARS-CoV-2 S (E) IgG, (F) IgA, and (G) IgM. (H) S IgG correlation with RBD IgG. (I–K) Plasma ELISA titers to SARS-CoV-2 Nucleocapsid (N) protein (I) IgG, (J) IgA, and (K) IgM. (L) N IgG correlation with S IgG. (M) Pseudovirus (PSV) neutralizing antibody titers in unexposed, acute, and convalescent COVID-19 samples. (N) PSV neutralizing antibody titers correlated with RBD IgG titers. (O and P) Both (O) RBD IgG and (P) PSV neutralizing Ab titers were detectable in most acute and all convalescent COVID-19 cases at all time points tested. The dotted line indicates LOD. Geometric mean titers with geometric SDs are indicated. Acute (Ac) = Red, Convalescent (Co) = black, Unexposed = gray. White = all COVID-19 (acute and convalescent). ∗p < 0.05, ∗∗p < 0.01, ∗∗∗p < 0.001, ∗∗∗∗p < 0.0001, NS = not significant. See also Figure S1.
Figure 1 SARS-CoV-2 Antibody Responses in COVID-19 Subjects (A–C) Plasma antibody titers to SARS-CoV-2 S RBD (A) IgG, (B) IgA, and (C) IgM, divided into unexposed n = 15, acute (Ac) n = 28, and convalescent (Co) n = 15. (D) SARS-CoV-2 RBD IgG correlates with RBD IgA. (E–G) Plasma ELISA titers to SARS-CoV-2 S (E) IgG, (F) IgA, and (G) IgM. (H) S IgG correlation with RBD IgG. (I–K) Plasma ELISA titers to SARS-CoV-2 Nucleocapsid (N) protein (I) IgG, (J) IgA, and (K) IgM. (L) N IgG correlation with S IgG. (M) Pseudovirus (PSV) neutralizing antibody titers in unexposed, acute, and convalescent COVID-19 samples. (N) PSV neutralizing antibody titers correlated with RBD IgG titers. (O and P) Both (O) RBD IgG and (P) PSV neutralizing Ab titers were detectable in most acute and all convalescent COVID-19 cases at all time points tested. The dotted line indicates LOD. Geometric mean titers with geometric SDs are indicated. Acute (Ac) = Red, Convalescent (Co) = black, Unexposed = gray. White = all COVID-19 (acute and convalescent). ∗p < 0.05, ∗∗p < 0.01, ∗∗∗p < 0.001, ∗∗∗∗p < 0.0001, NS = not significant. See also Figure S1.CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 2 SARS-CoV-2-Specific CD4+ T Cell Responses (A) Representative flow cytometry gating of AIM+ (OX40+surfaceCD40L+) CD4+ T cells. (B) Percentage of background subtracted SARS-CoV-2-specific total CD4+ T cells quantified by AIM after stimulation with MP_R (Non-Spike), S (Spike), M (Membrane), or N (Nucleocapsid) peptide pools in unexposed (n = 15), acute COVID-19 (n = 30) and convalescent COVID-19 (n = 15). (C and D) Percentage of background subtracted combined MP_R, S, M, and N SARS-CoV-2-specific CD4+ T cells by AIM assay by (C) cohort and (D) by days PSO. Combined AIM responses were calculated as the sum of the CD4+ AIM response to background-subtracted individual peptide megapools. Statistics in (D) are reported for unexposed, convalescent, and acute samples. (E and F) ICS of SARS-CoV-2-specific CD4+ T cells quantified by co-expression of (E) CD40L+IFNγ+ or (F) CD40L+IL-2+ after stimulation with SARS-CoV-2 peptide pools in unexposed (n = 8), acute COVID-19 (n = 14) and convalescent COVID-19 samples (n = 11). (G and H) Cytokines IFNγ (G) and IL-2 (H) in the supernatants after stimulation with SARS-CoV-2 or CMV peptide pools in unexposed (n = 15), acute COVID-19 (n = 22), convalescent COVID-19 (n = 15), and CMV+ controls (n = 23). The black dotted line delineates background signal as determined by the unexposed controls. (I) Representative flow cytometry of SARS-CoV-2-specific (OX40+CD40L+) CD4+ T cells (blue dots) overlaid on total CD4+T cells (black dots). (J) Percentage of SARS-CoV-2-specific cTFH cells in acute COVID-19 (n = 22) or convalescent COVID-19 (n = 15) samples that had a positive total CD4+ AIM response (> 0.04%) following stimulation with the SARS-CoV-2 S megapool (MP), or the total non-antigen-specific CXCR5+ CD4+ T cells in unexposed controls (n = 15, gray dots) (median displayed). (K) Representative fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS) plots of CXCR3 and CCR6 staining in total cTFH (CXCR5+CD4+ cells) in unexposed donors or S-specific AIM+ (OX40+CD40L+) CD4+ T cells in acute and convalescent donors. (L and M) Frequency of (L) CXCR3 and/or CCR6 expressing S-specific AIM+ cells out of total CD4+ T cells in acute or convalescent samples or non-antigen-specific CXCR5+CD4+ cTFH in unexposed samples (n = 15) and (M) CXCR5+ S-reactive AIM+ cells out of total CD4+ T cells in acute donors (n = 26 samples) or convalescent donors (n = 15 samples). Unless otherwise stated, the black dotted line indicates LOD; the green dotted line demarcates marginal responses as determined by unexposed donor responses. Pink dots denote samples where two or more peptide pools were not run due to cell numbers. ∗p < 0.05, ∗∗p < 0.01, ∗∗∗p < 0.001, ∗∗∗∗p < 0.0001, NS = not significant. See also Figure S2, Table S4, and Table S5.
Figure 2 SARS-CoV-2-Specific CD4+ T Cell Responses (A) Representative flow cytometry gating of AIM+ (OX40+surfaceCD40L+) CD4+ T cells. (B) Percentage of background subtracted SARS-CoV-2-specific total CD4+ T cells quantified by AIM after stimulation with MP_R (Non-Spike), S (Spike), M (Membrane), or N (Nucleocapsid) peptide pools in unexposed (n = 15), acute COVID-19 (n = 30) and convalescent COVID-19 (n = 15). (C and D) Percentage of background subtracted combined MP_R, S, M, and N SARS-CoV-2-specific CD4+ T cells by AIM assay by (C) cohort and (D) by days PSO. Combined AIM responses were calculated as the sum of the CD4+ AIM response to background-subtracted individual peptide megapools. Statistics in (D) are reported for unexposed, convalescent, and acute samples. (E and F) ICS of SARS-CoV-2-specific CD4+ T cells quantified by co-expression of (E) CD40L+IFNγ+ or (F) CD40L+IL-2+ after stimulation with SARS-CoV-2 peptide pools in unexposed (n = 8), acute COVID-19 (n = 14) and convalescent COVID-19 samples (n = 11). (G and H) Cytokines IFNγ (G) and IL-2 (H) in the supernatants after stimulation with SARS-CoV-2 or CMV peptide pools in unexposed (n = 15), acute COVID-19 (n = 22), convalescent COVID-19 (n = 15), and CMV+ controls (n = 23). The black dotted line delineates background signal as determined by the unexposed controls. (I) Representative flow cytometry of SARS-CoV-2-specific (OX40+CD40L+) CD4+ T cells (blue dots) overlaid on total CD4+T cells (black dots). (J) Percentage of SARS-CoV-2-specific cTFH cells in acute COVID-19 (n = 22) or convalescent COVID-19 (n = 15) samples that had a positive total CD4+ AIM response (> 0.04%) following stimulation with the SARS-CoV-2 S megapool (MP), or the total non-antigen-specific CXCR5+ CD4+ T cells in unexposed controls (n = 15, gray dots) (median displayed). (K) Representative fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS) plots of CXCR3 and CCR6 staining in total cTFH (CXCR5+CD4+ cells) in unexposed donors or S-specific AIM+ (OX40+CD40L+) CD4+ T cells in acute and convalescent donors. (L and M) Frequency of (L) CXCR3 and/or CCR6 expressing S-specific AIM+ cells out of total CD4+ T cells in acute or convalescent samples or non-antigen-specific CXCR5+CD4+ cTFH in unexposed samples (n = 15) and (M) CXCR5+ S-reactive AIM+ cells out of total CD4+ T cells in acute donors (n = 26 samples) or convalescent donors (n = 15 samples). Unless otherwise stated, the black dotted line indicates LOD; the green dotted line demarcates marginal responses as determined by unexposed donor responses. Pink dots denote samples where two or more peptide pools were not run due to cell numbers. ∗p < 0.05, ∗∗p < 0.01, ∗∗∗p < 0.001, ∗∗∗∗p < 0.0001, NS = not significant. See also Figure S2, Table S4, and Table S5.CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure S2 SARS-CoV-2-Specific CD4+ T Cell Responses, Related to Figure 2 (A) Gating strategy for identification of SARS-CoV-2-antigen-specific CD4+ T cells. (B) % of OX40+4-1BB+ CD4+ T cells specific for SARS-CoV-2 MP_R, S, M, N peptide megapools by AIM (C) Combined % Ox40+4-1-BB+ CD4+ T cells across all SARS-CoV-2 peptide megapools by AIM. The black dotted line indicates LOD; the green dotted line demarcates marginal responses as determined by unexposed donor responses. Pink dots denote samples where two or more peptide pools were not run due to cell numbers. (D-F) Amount (pg/mL) of (D) IL-5 (E), IL-13 (F), and IL-17 in the AIM supernatants after stimulation with MP_R, S, M, N, and CMV peptide pools. The black dotted line delineates background signal as determined by the unexposed controls. Acute (Ac) = Red, Convalescent (Co) = black, Unexposed (Unexp) = gray. ∗p < 0.05, ∗∗p < 0.01, NS = not significant.
Figure S2 SARS-CoV-2-Specific CD4+ T Cell Responses, Related to Figure 2 (A) Gating strategy for identification of SARS-CoV-2-antigen-specific CD4+ T cells. (B) % of OX40+4-1BB+ CD4+ T cells specific for SARS-CoV-2 MP_R, S, M, N peptide megapools by AIM (C) Combined % Ox40+4-1-BB+ CD4+ T cells across all SARS-CoV-2 peptide megapools by AIM. The black dotted line indicates LOD; the green dotted line demarcates marginal responses as determined by unexposed donor responses. Pink dots denote samples where two or more peptide pools were not run due to cell numbers. (D-F) Amount (pg/mL) of (D) IL-5 (E), IL-13 (F), and IL-17 in the AIM supernatants after stimulation with MP_R, S, M, N, and CMV peptide pools. The black dotted line delineates background signal as determined by the unexposed controls. Acute (Ac) = Red, Convalescent (Co) = black, Unexposed (Unexp) = gray. ∗p < 0.05, ∗∗p < 0.01, NS = not significant.CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 3 SARS-CoV-2-Specific CD8+ T Cell Responses (A) Sample flow cytometry gating of AIM (CD69+4-1BB+) CD8+ T cells. (B) Percentage of background subtracted SARS-CoV-2-specific total CD8+ T cells via AIM assay after stimulation with CD8_A/B, MP_R (Non-Spike), S (Spike), M (Membrane), N (Nucleocapsid) peptide pools in unexposed (n = 15), acute COVID-19 (n = 30) and convalescent COVID-19 (n = 15). (C and D) Percentage of background subtracted combined CD8-A/B, R, S, M, and N SARS-CoV-2-specific total CD4+ T cells by AIM assay (C) by cohort and (D) by days PSO. Combined AIM responses were calculated as the sum of the CD8+ AIM response to background-subtracted individual peptide megapools. Statistics in (D) are reported for unexposed, acute, and convalescent samples. (E) Quantitation of IFNγ in supernatants after stimulation with peptide pools unexposed (n = 15), acute COVID-19 (n = 21), and convalescent COVID-19 (n = 15). The black dotted line delineates background signal as determined by the unexposed controls. (F) Percentage of background subtracted SARS-CoV-2-specific total CD8+ T cells quantified by expression of IFNγ+ by ICS. (G) Representative flow cytometry gating of IFNγ+GzmB+ CD8+ T cells in acute and convalescent COVID-19 samples. (H) Percentage of IFNγ+ CD8+ T cells expressing granzyme B (GzmB), TNFα, or IL10 by ICS in unexposed (n = 8), acute COVID-19 (n = 14) and convalescent COVID-19 (n = 11). Unless otherwise stated, the black dotted line indicates LOD; the green dotted line demarcates marginal responses as determined by unexposed donor responses. Pink dots denote samples where two or more peptide pools were not run due to cell numbers. ∗p < 0.05, ∗∗p < 0.01, ∗∗∗p < 0.001, ∗∗∗∗p < 0.0001, NS = not significant. See also Figure S3, Table S4, and Table S5.
Figure 3 SARS-CoV-2-Specific CD8+ T Cell Responses (A) Sample flow cytometry gating of AIM (CD69+4-1BB+) CD8+ T cells. (B) Percentage of background subtracted SARS-CoV-2-specific total CD8+ T cells via AIM assay after stimulation with CD8_A/B, MP_R (Non-Spike), S (Spike), M (Membrane), N (Nucleocapsid) peptide pools in unexposed (n = 15), acute COVID-19 (n = 30) and convalescent COVID-19 (n = 15). (C and D) Percentage of background subtracted combined CD8-A/B, R, S, M, and N SARS-CoV-2-specific total CD4+ T cells by AIM assay (C) by cohort and (D) by days PSO. Combined AIM responses were calculated as the sum of the CD8+ AIM response to background-subtracted individual peptide megapools. Statistics in (D) are reported for unexposed, acute, and convalescent samples. (E) Quantitation of IFNγ in supernatants after stimulation with peptide pools unexposed (n = 15), acute COVID-19 (n = 21), and convalescent COVID-19 (n = 15). The black dotted line delineates background signal as determined by the unexposed controls. (F) Percentage of background subtracted SARS-CoV-2-specific total CD8+ T cells quantified by expression of IFNγ+ by ICS. (G) Representative flow cytometry gating of IFNγ+GzmB+ CD8+ T cells in acute and convalescent COVID-19 samples. (H) Percentage of IFNγ+ CD8+ T cells expressing granzyme B (GzmB), TNFα, or IL10 by ICS in unexposed (n = 8), acute COVID-19 (n = 14) and convalescent COVID-19 (n = 11). Unless otherwise stated, the black dotted line indicates LOD; the green dotted line demarcates marginal responses as determined by unexposed donor responses. Pink dots denote samples where two or more peptide pools were not run due to cell numbers. ∗p < 0.05, ∗∗p < 0.01, ∗∗∗p < 0.001, ∗∗∗∗p < 0.0001, NS = not significant. See also Figure S3, Table S4, and Table S5.CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure S3 SARS-CoV-2-Specific CD8+ T Cell Responses, Related to Figure 3 (A) Gating strategy for identification of SARS-CoV-2-antigen-specific CD8+ T cells. (B) Percentage of background subtracted SARS-CoV-2-specific total CD8+ T cells quantified by co-expression of IFNg and granzyme B (GzmB) by ICS in unexposed (n = 8), acute COVID-19 (n = 11) and convalescent COVID-19 (n = 11). The black dotted line indicates LOD. Acute (Ac) = Red, Convalescent (Co) = black, Unexposed (Unexp) = gray. ∗p < 0.05, ∗∗p < 0.01. NS = not significant.
Figure S3 SARS-CoV-2-Specific CD8+ T Cell Responses, Related to Figure 3 (A) Gating strategy for identification of SARS-CoV-2-antigen-specific CD8+ T cells. (B) Percentage of background subtracted SARS-CoV-2-specific total CD8+ T cells quantified by co-expression of IFNg and granzyme B (GzmB) by ICS in unexposed (n = 8), acute COVID-19 (n = 11) and convalescent COVID-19 (n = 11). The black dotted line indicates LOD. Acute (Ac) = Red, Convalescent (Co) = black, Unexposed (Unexp) = gray. ∗p < 0.05, ∗∗p < 0.01. NS = not significant.CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 4 Coordinated Adaptive Immune Responses to SARS-CoV-2 (A) Correlation of SARS-CoV-2-specific CD4+ T cells and RBD IgG. (B) Correlation of SARS-CoV-2-specific CD8+ T cells and RBD IgG. (C) Correlation of SARS-CoV-2-specific CD4+ and CD8+ T cells. (D) PSV neutralizing antibody titers over time for acute COVID-19 subjects with paired blood samples. Open circles denote other acute COVID-19 samples. Unexposed controls (n = 15), acute COVID-19 (n = 26), and convalescent COVID-19 (n = 15). The black dotted line indicates LOD; the green dotted line demarcates marginal responses as determined by unexposed donor responses. Pink dots denote samples where two or more peptide pools were not run due to cell numbers. (E) Association between SARS-CoV-2 PSV-neutralizing antibodies and peak disease severity. (F and G) Association between (F) SARS-CoV-2-specific CD4+ T cells and (G) SARS-CoV-2-specific CD8+ T cells (“Low” < 0.1%, “High” > 0.1% combined AIM+) and COVID-19 peak disease severity. (H) Association between ADIM score and COVID-19 peak disease severity. Acute COVID-19 samples (n = 26) and convalescent COVID-19 samples (n = 26). Statistics for (A–C) are reported for unexposed, convalescent, and acute samples. ∗p < 0.05, ∗∗p < 0.01, NS = not significant. See also Figure S4 and Data S1.
Figure 4 Coordinated Adaptive Immune Responses to SARS-CoV-2 (A) Correlation of SARS-CoV-2-specific CD4+ T cells and RBD IgG. (B) Correlation of SARS-CoV-2-specific CD8+ T cells and RBD IgG. (C) Correlation of SARS-CoV-2-specific CD4+ and CD8+ T cells. (D) PSV neutralizing antibody titers over time for acute COVID-19 subjects with paired blood samples. Open circles denote other acute COVID-19 samples. Unexposed controls (n = 15), acute COVID-19 (n = 26), and convalescent COVID-19 (n = 15). The black dotted line indicates LOD; the green dotted line demarcates marginal responses as determined by unexposed donor responses. Pink dots denote samples where two or more peptide pools were not run due to cell numbers. (E) Association between SARS-CoV-2 PSV-neutralizing antibodies and peak disease severity. (F and G) Association between (F) SARS-CoV-2-specific CD4+ T cells and (G) SARS-CoV-2-specific CD8+ T cells (“Low” < 0.1%, “High” > 0.1% combined AIM+) and COVID-19 peak disease severity. (H) Association between ADIM score and COVID-19 peak disease severity. Acute COVID-19 samples (n = 26) and convalescent COVID-19 samples (n = 26). Statistics for (A–C) are reported for unexposed, convalescent, and acute samples. ∗p < 0.05, ∗∗p < 0.01, NS = not significant. See also Figure S4 and Data S1.CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure S4 Coordinated Adaptive Immune Responses, Related to Figure 4 (A-B) PSV neutralizing titer (A) and (B) percentage of SARS-CoV-2-specific TFH cells in samples that had a positive total CD4+ AIM response (> 0.04%) following stimulation with the SARS-CoV-2 S MP, or the total CXCR5+ CD4+ T cells in unexposed controls in additional unexposed donors (n = 12) and convalescent COVID-19 donors (n = 11). (C-D) Flow cytometry of AIM+ CD4+ T cell response (C) and AIM+ CD8+ T cells response (D) in donor C4844. (E) Frequency of ADIM observed in the cohort. (F) Correlation of SARS-CoV-2-specific total CD4+ T cells by OX40+CD40L+ AIM assay and days PSO, stratified into Immunotypes. Statistics are reported for unexposed, convalescent and acute samples. (G) Frequency of ADIM by gender. (H-I) Combined CD4+ AIM data based on day PSO from Fig. 2D and 3D with responses labeled for specific donors of interest. Statistics in (H-I) are reported for unexposed, convalescent and acute samples. The black dotted line indicates LOD; the green dotted line demarcates marginal responses as determined by unexposed donor responses. Pink dots denote samples where two or more peptide pools were not run due to cell numbers. NS = not significant, ∗∗∗p < 0.001, geometric mean with geometric SD displayed in S4A, median displayed in S4B.
Figure S4 Coordinated Adaptive Immune Responses, Related to Figure 4 (A-B) PSV neutralizing titer (A) and (B) percentage of SARS-CoV-2-specific TFH cells in samples that had a positive total CD4+ AIM response (> 0.04%) following stimulation with the SARS-CoV-2 S MP, or the total CXCR5+ CD4+ T cells in unexposed controls in additional unexposed donors (n = 12) and convalescent COVID-19 donors (n = 11). (C-D) Flow cytometry of AIM+ CD4+ T cell response (C) and AIM+ CD8+ T cells response (D) in donor C4844. (E) Frequency of ADIM observed in the cohort. (F) Correlation of SARS-CoV-2-specific total CD4+ T cells by OX40+CD40L+ AIM assay and days PSO, stratified into Immunotypes. Statistics are reported for unexposed, convalescent and acute samples. (G) Frequency of ADIM by gender. (H-I) Combined CD4+ AIM data based on day PSO from Fig. 2D and 3D with responses labeled for specific donors of interest. Statistics in (H-I) are reported for unexposed, convalescent and acute samples. The black dotted line indicates LOD; the green dotted line demarcates marginal responses as determined by unexposed donor responses. Pink dots denote samples where two or more peptide pools were not run due to cell numbers. NS = not significant, ∗∗∗p < 0.001, geometric mean with geometric SD displayed in S4A, median displayed in S4B.CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure S5 Plasma Cytokines and Immunophenotyping, Related to Figure 5 (A-M) Quantitation of plasma cytokine levels from acute (n = 24) and unexposed (n = 15) donors: (A) CXCL10, (B) IL-8, and (C) IL-6. (D) IL-1b, (E) TNFa, (F) IFNl1, (G) IL12p70, (H) IFNa2, (I) IFNl2, (J) GM-CSF, (K) IFNb, (L) IL-10, (M) IFNg. (N) Correlation of CD3-CD19- PBMCs and peak disease severity. Statistics are reported for convalescent and acute samples. (O-P) Correlation of (O) activated CD4 T cells with combined AIM+ CD4 T cells and (P) activated CD8 T cells with combined AIM+ CD8 T cells across all donors. Statistics are reported for unexposed, convalescent and acute samples. (Q) Correlation of (CD38hiCD20-CD19+) plasmablasts with RBD IgG titers. Statistics are reported for unexposed and acute samples. (R) Gating strategies for plasmablasts and T cell subtypes. The black dotted line indicates LOD; the green dotted line demarcates marginal responses as determined by unexposed donor responses. Pink dots denote samples where two or more peptide pools were not run due to cell numbers. Acute (Ac) = Red, Convalescent = black, Unexposed (Unexp) = gray. ∗∗∗p < 0.001, ∗∗∗∗p < 0.0001, NS = not significant.
Figure S5 Plasma Cytokines and Immunophenotyping, Related to Figure 5 (A-M) Quantitation of plasma cytokine levels from acute (n = 24) and unexposed (n = 15) donors: (A) CXCL10, (B) IL-8, and (C) IL-6. (D) IL-1b, (E) TNFa, (F) IFNl1, (G) IL12p70, (H) IFNa2, (I) IFNl2, (J) GM-CSF, (K) IFNb, (L) IL-10, (M) IFNg. (N) Correlation of CD3-CD19- PBMCs and peak disease severity. Statistics are reported for convalescent and acute samples. (O-P) Correlation of (O) activated CD4 T cells with combined AIM+ CD4 T cells and (P) activated CD8 T cells with combined AIM+ CD8 T cells across all donors. Statistics are reported for unexposed, convalescent and acute samples. (Q) Correlation of (CD38hiCD20-CD19+) plasmablasts with RBD IgG titers. Statistics are reported for unexposed and acute samples. (R) Gating strategies for plasmablasts and T cell subtypes. The black dotted line indicates LOD; the green dotted line demarcates marginal responses as determined by unexposed donor responses. Pink dots denote samples where two or more peptide pools were not run due to cell numbers. Acute (Ac) = Red, Convalescent = black, Unexposed (Unexp) = gray. ∗∗∗p < 0.001, ∗∗∗∗p < 0.0001, NS = not significant.CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure S6 Correlations of the Immune Response with Disease Severity in COVID-19 Donors, Related to Figure 6 Correlogram of all COVID-19 cases. Spearman R values are shown from red (−1.0) to blue (1.0); r values are indicated by color and square size. Peak COVID-19 disease severity (“Peak disease”) is the bottom row. Additional information on feature names are described in the STAR Methods. Blank fields with dots indicate lack of signal. p values are indicated by white asterisks. ∗p < 0.05, ∗∗p < 0.01, ∗∗∗p < 0.001.
Figure S6 Correlations of the Immune Response with Disease Severity in COVID-19 Donors, Related to Figure 6 Correlogram of all COVID-19 cases. Spearman R values are shown from red (−1.0) to blue (1.0); r values are indicated by color and square size. Peak COVID-19 disease severity (“Peak disease”) is the bottom row. Additional information on feature names are described in the STAR Methods. Blank fields with dots indicate lack of signal. p values are indicated by white asterisks. ∗p < 0.05, ∗∗p < 0.01, ∗∗∗p < 0.001.CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 5 Associations of Adaptive Immune Response Features with COVID-19 Severity (A) Correlogram of acute COVID-19 donors. Spearman rank order correlation values (r) are shown from red (−1.0) to blue (1.0); r values are indicated by color and square size. Blank fields with black dots indicate lack of signal. p values are indicated by white asterisks. The teal triangle denotes SARS-CoV-2 antibody features, magenta triangle denotes SARS-CoV-2-specific CD4+ T cells features, and orange triangle denotes SARS-CoV-2-specific CD8+ T cell features. Purple rectangles denote coordinated adaptive immune response features. The dark green line denotes select inflammatory cytokines. Peak COVID-19 disease severity (“Peak disease”) is the bottom row. Additional information on feature names are described in the STAR Methods. (B) Correlation of Ki67+CD38+HLA-DR+ CD4+ T cells (as percentage of total CD4+ T cells) with SARS-CoV-2-specific (combined AIM+) CD4+ T cells. (C) Correlation of Ki67+CD38+HLA-DR+ CD8+ T cells (as percentage of total CD8+ T cells) with SARS-CoV-2-specific (combined AIM+) CD8+ T cells. (D) Correlation of activated (ICOS+PD-1hi) TFH cells (as percentage of total CD4+ T cells) with SARS-CoV-2-specific (combined AIM+) TFH (CXCR5+CD4+) cells. (E) Correlation of SARS-CoV-2 PSV-neutralizing antibody titer and percentage plasmablasts (CD38hiCD20- of CD19+ B cells). Unexposed controls (n = 15), acute COVID-19 (n = 26) displayed. Statistics reported for (B–E) are reported for unexposed and acute donors. The black dotted line indicates LOD; the green dotted line demarcates marginal responses as determined by unexposed donor responses. ∗p < 0.05, ∗∗p < 0.01, ∗∗∗p < 0.001. See also Figure S5, Table S3, and Data S1.
Figure 5 Associations of Adaptive Immune Response Features with COVID-19 Severity (A) Correlogram of acute COVID-19 donors. Spearman rank order correlation values (r) are shown from red (−1.0) to blue (1.0); r values are indicated by color and square size. Blank fields with black dots indicate lack of signal. p values are indicated by white asterisks. The teal triangle denotes SARS-CoV-2 antibody features, magenta triangle denotes SARS-CoV-2-specific CD4+ T cells features, and orange triangle denotes SARS-CoV-2-specific CD8+ T cell features. Purple rectangles denote coordinated adaptive immune response features. The dark green line denotes select inflammatory cytokines. Peak COVID-19 disease severity (“Peak disease”) is the bottom row. Additional information on feature names are described in the STAR Methods. (B) Correlation of Ki67+CD38+HLA-DR+ CD4+ T cells (as percentage of total CD4+ T cells) with SARS-CoV-2-specific (combined AIM+) CD4+ T cells. (C) Correlation of Ki67+CD38+HLA-DR+ CD8+ T cells (as percentage of total CD8+ T cells) with SARS-CoV-2-specific (combined AIM+) CD8+ T cells. (D) Correlation of activated (ICOS+PD-1hi) TFH cells (as percentage of total CD4+ T cells) with SARS-CoV-2-specific (combined AIM+) TFH (CXCR5+CD4+) cells. (E) Correlation of SARS-CoV-2 PSV-neutralizing antibody titer and percentage plasmablasts (CD38hiCD20- of CD19+ B cells). Unexposed controls (n = 15), acute COVID-19 (n = 26) displayed. Statistics reported for (B–E) are reported for unexposed and acute donors. The black dotted line indicates LOD; the green dotted line demarcates marginal responses as determined by unexposed donor responses. ∗p < 0.05, ∗∗p < 0.01, ∗∗∗p < 0.001. See also Figure S5, Table S3, and Data S1.CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 6 Association of Age and Naive T Cells with COVID-19 Severity (A and B) Correlograms of acute donors < 65 years (A) and ≥ 65 years (B). As in Figure 5, Spearman r correlation values are shown from red (−1.0) to blue (1.0); r values are indicated by color and square size. Blank fields with dots indicate lack of signal. p values are indicated by white asterisks. Also, as in Figure 5, the teal triangle denotes SARS-CoV-2 antibody features, magenta triangle denotes SARS-CoV-2-specific CD4+ T cells features, and orange triangle denotes SARS-CoV-2-specific CD8+ T cell features. Purple rectangles denote coordinated adaptive immune response features. Peak COVID-19 disease severity (“Peak disease”) is the bottom row. Select inflammatory cytokines are labeled with a dark green line. (C) Correlation of age and peak disease severity. Statistics for full dataset shown are in black; statistics for acute COVID-19 cases are in red. (D) Correlation of naive CD4+ T cells (as percentage of total CD4+ T cells) with age. Statistics for full dataset are shown in black; statistics for all COVID-19 cases (convalescent and acute) are in blue; statistics for acute COVID-19 cases are in red. (E) Correlation of naive CD4+ T cells (as percentage of total CD4+ T cells) and peak disease severity. Statistics for all COVID-19 cases (convalescent and acute) are in blue; statistics for acute COVID-19 cases are in red. (F) Correlation of naive CD8+ T cells (as percentage of total CD8+ T cells) with age. Statistics for full dataset are shown in black; statistics for all COVID-19 cases (convalescent and acute) are in blue; statistics for acute COVID-19 cases are in red. (G) Correlation of naive CD8+ T cells (as percentage of total CD8+ T cells) and peak disease severity. Statistics for all COVID-19 cases (convalescent and acute) are in blue; statistics for acute COVID-19 cases are in red. Unexposed controls in gray (n = 67), convalescent COVID-19 in black (n = 15), acute COVID-19 in red (n = 26) displayed. ∗p < 0.05, ∗∗p < 0.01, ∗∗∗p < 0.001. See also Figures S6 and S7, Table S3, and Data S1.
Figure 6 Association of Age and Naive T Cells with COVID-19 Severity (A and B) Correlograms of acute donors < 65 years (A) and ≥ 65 years (B). As in Figure 5, Spearman r correlation values are shown from red (−1.0) to blue (1.0); r values are indicated by color and square size. Blank fields with dots indicate lack of signal. p values are indicated by white asterisks. Also, as in Figure 5, the teal triangle denotes SARS-CoV-2 antibody features, magenta triangle denotes SARS-CoV-2-specific CD4+ T cells features, and orange triangle denotes SARS-CoV-2-specific CD8+ T cell features. Purple rectangles denote coordinated adaptive immune response features. Peak COVID-19 disease severity (“Peak disease”) is the bottom row. Select inflammatory cytokines are labeled with a dark green line. (C) Correlation of age and peak disease severity. Statistics for full dataset shown are in black; statistics for acute COVID-19 cases are in red. (D) Correlation of naive CD4+ T cells (as percentage of total CD4+ T cells) with age. Statistics for full dataset are shown in black; statistics for all COVID-19 cases (convalescent and acute) are in blue; statistics for acute COVID-19 cases are in red. (E) Correlation of naive CD4+ T cells (as percentage of total CD4+ T cells) and peak disease severity. Statistics for all COVID-19 cases (convalescent and acute) are in blue; statistics for acute COVID-19 cases are in red. (F) Correlation of naive CD8+ T cells (as percentage of total CD8+ T cells) with age. Statistics for full dataset are shown in black; statistics for all COVID-19 cases (convalescent and acute) are in blue; statistics for acute COVID-19 cases are in red. (G) Correlation of naive CD8+ T cells (as percentage of total CD8+ T cells) and peak disease severity. Statistics for all COVID-19 cases (convalescent and acute) are in blue; statistics for acute COVID-19 cases are in red. Unexposed controls in gray (n = 67), convalescent COVID-19 in black (n = 15), acute COVID-19 in red (n = 26) displayed. ∗p < 0.05, ∗∗p < 0.01, ∗∗∗p < 0.001. See also Figures S6 and S7, Table S3, and Data S1.CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure S7 Uncoordinated Adaptive Immunity in the Elderly, Related to Figures 6 and 7 (A-B) Correlograms of all acute COVID-19 cases age < 75 (A) and ≥ 75 (B). Spearman R values are shown from red (−1.0) to blue (1.0). Blank fields with dots indicate lack of signal. (C) Correlogram of curated markers of adaptive immune responses in acute COVID-19 subjects (top) and all COVID-19 subjects (bottom). Spearman r correlation values are shown from red (−1.0) to blue (1.0). ∗p < 0.05, ∗∗p < 0.001, ∗∗∗p < 0.0001. Thick black squares outlining a field indicate adjusted FDR < 0.05. (D-E) Gating strategies for (D) naive CD8+ and (E) CD4+ T cells for acute and donors < 75 years old and ≥75 years old, and convalescent donors. (F) Secreted IFNg (pg/mL) after SARS-CoV-2 CD8A/B MP stimulation, versus peak COVID-19 disease severity, acute samples (n = 21). Statistics in (F) are reported for acute samples (shown in red). ∗p < 0.05, ∗∗p < 0.001, ∗∗∗p < 0.0001.
Figure S7 Uncoordinated Adaptive Immunity in the Elderly, Related to Figures 6 and 7 (A-B) Correlograms of all acute COVID-19 cases age < 75 (A) and ≥ 75 (B). Spearman R values are shown from red (−1.0) to blue (1.0). Blank fields with dots indicate lack of signal. (C) Correlogram of curated markers of adaptive immune responses in acute COVID-19 subjects (top) and all COVID-19 subjects (bottom). Spearman r correlation values are shown from red (−1.0) to blue (1.0). ∗p < 0.05, ∗∗p < 0.001, ∗∗∗p < 0.0001. Thick black squares outlining a field indicate adjusted FDR < 0.05. (D-E) Gating strategies for (D) naive CD8+ and (E) CD4+ T cells for acute and donors < 75 years old and ≥75 years old, and convalescent donors. (F) Secreted IFNg (pg/mL) after SARS-CoV-2 CD8A/B MP stimulation, versus peak COVID-19 disease severity, acute samples (n = 21). Statistics in (F) are reported for acute samples (shown in red). ∗p < 0.05, ∗∗p < 0.001, ∗∗∗p < 0.0001.CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 7 Associations of COVID-19-Specific CD4 and CD8 T Cell Responses and Disease Severity (A) Frequency of IFNγ+ CD8+ T cells in response to CD8A/B MP ICS, versus peak COVID-19 disease severity, acute donors (n = 11 samples). Dotted line indicates LOD. (B–D) Associations between peak COVID-19 disease severity and number per million PBMC of (B) AIM+ CD8+ T cells (CD69+4-1BB+CD8+), (C) AIM+ CD4+ T cells (OX40+surfaceCD40L+), or (D) AIM+ cTFH cells (OX40+CD40L+CXCR5+CD4+) across all SARS-CoV-2 peptide-specific MPs, acute samples (n = 26), and convalescent samples (n = 15). (E and F) Frequency of (E) CXCR3-CCR6+ S-specific (AIM+) CD4+ T cells and (F) CXCR5+CXCR3-CCR6+ S-specific (AIM+) cTFH CD4+ T cells versus peak disease severity, acute samples (n = 26), and convalescent samples (n = 15). Dotted line denotes LOD. Statistics for acute COVID-19 cases are in red; statistics for all COVID-19 cases (convalescent and acute) are in black. See also Figure S7 and Data S1.
Figure 7 Associations of COVID-19-Specific CD4 and CD8 T Cell Responses and Disease Severity (A) Frequency of IFNγ+ CD8+ T cells in response to CD8A/B MP ICS, versus peak COVID-19 disease severity, acute donors (n = 11 samples). Dotted line indicates LOD. (B–D) Associations between peak COVID-19 disease severity and number per million PBMC of (B) AIM+ CD8+ T cells (CD69+4-1BB+CD8+), (C) AIM+ CD4+ T cells (OX40+surfaceCD40L+), or (D) AIM+ cTFH cells (OX40+CD40L+CXCR5+CD4+) across all SARS-CoV-2 peptide-specific MPs, acute samples (n = 26), and convalescent samples (n = 15). (E and F) Frequency of (E) CXCR3-CCR6+ S-specific (AIM+) CD4+ T cells and (F) CXCR5+CXCR3-CCR6+ S-specific (AIM+) cTFH CD4+ T cells versus peak disease severity, acute samples (n = 26), and convalescent samples (n = 15). Dotted line denotes LOD. Statistics for acute COVID-19 cases are in red; statistics for all COVID-19 cases (convalescent and acute) are in black. See also Figure S7 and Data S1.CC BY · PubMed Central

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 1,790

Metadata

Authors
Rydyznski Moderbacher, C., Ramirez, S. I., Dan, J. M., Grifoni, A., Hastie, K. M., Weiskopf, D., Belanger, S., Abbott, R. K., Kim, C., Choi, J., Kato, Y., Crotty, E. G., Kim, C., Rawlings, S. A., Mateus, J., Tse, L. P. V., Frazier, A., Baric, R., Peters, B., Greenbaum, J., Saphire, E. O., Smith, D. M., Sette, A., & Crotty, S.
Affiliations
  • La Jolla Institute for Immunology (US)
  • University of California San Diego (US)
  • University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
Corresponding author
  • Sette, Alessandro
  • Crotty, Shane
Venue
Cell
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-11
Volume
183
Issue
4
Pages
996-1012.e19
ISSN
0092-8674 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3084879098
Cited by
1,790
References
77
Citations by year
2026: 54 · 2025: 144 · 2024: 180 · 2023: 288 · 2022: 543 · 2021: 517 · 2020: 62
FWCI
46.45
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Cell (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation (INV-006133)
  • National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (U19 AI118626, AI100625, 75N9301900065, AI142742, AI145762, AI135078)
  • National Institutes of Health
  • Pontificia Universidad Javeriana
  • University of California, San Diego
  • Departamento Administrativo de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación
  • Wellcome
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › COVID-19 Clinical Research Studies
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Immune responses and vaccinations
Keywords
SARS-CoV-2, COVID-19 pandemic, CD4+ T cells, CD8+ T cells, neutralizing antibodies, disease severity, age, naive T cells, immunosenescence
MeSH terms
Betacoronavirus, COVID-19, SARS-CoV-2, Acute Disease, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Antibodies, Viral, Antigens, Viral, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Pneumonia, Viral, Severity of Illness Index, CD4-Positive T-Lymphocytes, Cytokines, Coronavirus Infections, CD8-Positive T-Lymphocytes, Young Adult, Adaptive Immunity, Antibodies, Neutralizing, Pandemics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review