Cited by 301Multisensory perception and integrationVirtual Reality Applications and ImpactsTactile and Sensory Interactions

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 64 of the 64 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

From Part- to Whole-Body Ownership in the Multisensory Brain

Open access

Abstract

The question of how we experience ownership of an entire body distinct from the external world is a fundamental problem in psychology and neuroscience [1-6]. Earlier studies suggest that integration of visual, tactile, and proprioceptive information in multisensory areas [7-11] mediates self-attribution of single limbs. However, it is still unknown how ownership of individual body parts translates into the unitary experience of owning a whole body. Here, we used a "body-swap" illusion [12], in which people experienced an artificial body to be their own, in combination with functional magnetic resonance imaging to reveal a coupling between the experience of full-body ownership and neural responses in bilateral ventral premotor and left intraparietal cortices, and left putamen. Importantly, activity in the ventral premotor cortex reflected the construction of ownership of a whole body from the parts, because it was stronger when the stimulated body part was attached to a body, was present irrespective of whether the illusion was triggered by stimulation of the hand or the abdomen, and displayed multivoxel patterns carrying information about full-body ownership. These findings suggest that the unitary experience of owning an entire body is produced by neuronal populations that integrate multisensory information across body segments.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.cub.2011.05.022

Cites

64 of 64 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 301

Metadata

Authors
Petkova, V. I., Björnsdotter, M., Gentile, G., Jonsson, T., Li, T.-Q., & Ehrsson, H. H.
Affiliations
  • Karolinska Institutet (SE)
  • Karolinska University Hospital (SE)
Corresponding author
Petkova, Valeria I.
Venue
Current Biology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2011-07
Volume
21
Issue
13
Pages
1118-1122
ISSN
0960-9822 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2079763587
Cited by
301
References
64
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 28 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 25 · 2020: 23 · 2019: 24 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 20 · 2016: 16 · 2015: 30 · 2014: 24 · 2013: 19 · 2012: 15
FWCI
25.53
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Current Biology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • European Research Council
  • Stiftelsen för Strategisk Forskning
  • James S. McDonnell Foundation
  • Human Frontier Science Program
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Multisensory perception and integration
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Virtual Reality Applications and Impacts
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Tactile and Sensory Interactions
Keywords
body ownership, multisensory integration, ventral premotor cortex, intraparietal cortex, putamen, self-attribution
MeSH terms
Body Image, Brain, Brain Mapping, Humans, Illusions, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Motor Cortex, Neurons, Ownership, Proprioception, Touch, Visual Perception, Touch Perception

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review