The DOI matches its Crossref record; 119 of the 119 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; 66 of the 145 sources its claims cite were checked for support.
Airway Management in Trauma
Open accessAbstract
Airway management in the trauma patient presents numerous unique challenges beyond placement of an endotracheal tube and outcomes are dependent on the provider's ability to anticipate difficulty. Airway management strategies for the care of the polytrauma patient are reviewed, with specific considerations for those presenting with traumatic brain injury, suspected c-spine injury, the contaminated airway, the agitated trauma patient, maxillofacial trauma, and the traumatized airway. An approach to airway management that considers the potential anatomic and physiologic challenges in caring for these complicated trauma patients is presented.
Overview
AI snapshot
Written from the paper’s full text.
TL;DR
This review outlines a physiology-first approach to trauma airway management, emphasizing resuscitation before intubation and anticipating anatomic and physiologic difficulty. It covers TBI, suspected cervical spine injury, contaminated airway, agitation, maxillofacial trauma, laryngotracheal injury, awake intubation, RSI, preoxygenation, and front-of-neck airway access.
Key findings
- Trauma accounts for 20% to 30% of emergency department intubations; 90% of difficult intubations are unanticipated. Cervical spine injuries occur in approximately 2% of the general trauma population and 6% to 8% of patients with head and facial trauma, while secondary neurologic deterioration is rare at 0.03%.
- Physiologic derangements are common and consequential: postintubation hypotension occurs in 23% to 46% of emergency airway cases, shock index greater than 0.8 identifies particular risk, and combined hypoxemia plus hypotension has an adjusted odds of death double that of either alone. Preintubation oxygen saturation less than 95% risks abrupt desaturation within 90 seconds of apnea.
- Airway contamination decreases first-attempt intubation success regardless of GlideScope or direct laryngoscopy in a retrospective review of more than 4600 intubations. In 1078 trauma patients intubated for discretionary indications, 62% had a significant head injury on investigation.
- Primary airway trauma is uncommon, with reported incidence less than 1% (0.4% blunt, 4.5% penetrating), and front-of-neck airway is rare at 0.05% to 1.7% of ED-based intubations. For RSI, induction agent dose should be reduced by at least 50% in hypotension or shock index greater than 0.8, rocuronium less than 1.0 mg/kg is inadequate with 1.2 to 1.6 mg/kg recommended, and ketamine 1 to 1.5 mg/kg may facilitate cooperation.
Methods
- Narrative clinical review/guidance; no primary study design, dataset, or formal analysis is reported.
- Synthesizes cited literature and expert opinion into scenario-based management pearls and algorithms for TBI, suspected cervical spine injury, contaminated airway, agitated patient, maxillofacial injuries, traumatized airway, awake intubation, RSI, preoxygenation, and FONA.
- Main analysis is qualitative synthesis; no quantitative meta-analysis or statistical testing is reported.
Limitations
- The paper states that prehospital endotracheal intubation data are conflicting, and the Eastern Association for the Surgery of Trauma could reach no conclusion regarding prehospital intubation for traumatic brain injury with or without RSI because of diversity in patient population, airway algorithms, EMS experience, and reporting.
- The paper states limited published evidence that cervical spine collars and immobilization prevent secondary spinal cord injury, inconsistent literature comparing intubation devices in cervical spine immobilization with no consensus on optimal approach, and limited evidence for FONA that will likely remain limited.
- Evident from the text: this is a narrative review without a systematic search or formal quality appraisal, and many recommendations are expert- or physiology-based, with some cited evidence from simulation or cadaveric studies.
Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
66 of 145 cited sources checked · 20 supported · 4 flagged · accuracy not yet measured
At least one cited source doesn’t support this claim or points to a different paper, and none confirmed it — see the verdicts below.
In the paper
“even in patients with known cervical spine injuries, secondary neurologic deterioration is rare, with a reported incidence of 0.03%.33,[37][38][39]”
§ Airway Management in Traum a > Kovacs & Sowers
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [33] Manoach, 2007, Manual in-line stabilization for acute airway management of suspected cervical spine injury: historical review and current questions, Ann Emerg Med source
- Disputedcites [37] Durga, 2014, Neurological deterioration during intubation in cervical spine disorders, Indian J Anaesth sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
In “Evidence of Cervical Injury Following Intubation” (page not available), the paper says approximately 5% of patients admitted with traumatic cervical injury deteriorate neurologically, not 0.03%. It separately describes published reports of deterioration associated with intubation as few, but gives no 0.03% incidence for patients with known cervical spine injuries. (LLM, conf=0.88)
Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [38] Crosby, 2006, Airway management in adults after cervical spine trauma, Anesthesiology source
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [39] Farmer, 1998, Neurologic deterioration after cervical spinal cord injury, J Spinal Disord source
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesAt least one cited source doesn’t support this claim or points to a different paper, and none confirmed it — see the verdicts below.
In the paper
“Although patients with mandibular fractures in 2 or more locations may be easier to intubate due to increased mobility of the mandible and attached soft tissues”
§ Airway Management in Traum a > Maxillofacial Injuries
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [64] Bowman-Howard, 2000, Management of the traumatized airway
- Disputedcites [66] Krausz, 2009, Maxillofacial trauma patient: coping with the difficult airway, World J Emerg Surg sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
In “Maxillofacial Trauma and Airway Injuries” (page unavailable), the paper says a bilateral anterior mandibular fracture may displace the tongue backward and block the airway. “The Complexity of the situation” describes maxillofacial trauma as often making intubation difficult. The paper does not describe increased mandibular mobility as making these patients easier to intubate. (LLM, conf=0.78)
Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:conditional· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesAt least one cited source doesn’t support this claim or points to a different paper, and none confirmed it — see the verdicts below.
In the paper
“However, recent reviews have shown that complications associated with jet ventilation are unacceptably high and wire-guided approaches are not as easy or successful as once believed.[114][115][116][117]”
§ Airway Management in Traum a > FRONT OF NECK AIRWAY TO SECURE THE AIRWAY
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [114] Duggan, 2016, Transtracheal jet ventilation in the “can’t intubate can’t oxygenate” emergency: a systematic review, Br J Anaesth source
- Disputedcites [115] Marshall, 2016, Evidence is important: safety considerations for emergency catheter cricothyroidotomy, Acad Emerg Med sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The opening section acknowledges that catheter oxygenation is inherently risky but says refinements have made complication rates significantly lower. “Evidence of Safety and Need for Ongoing Training” reports few complications when the prescribed technique was used. The paper discusses how to mitigate barotrauma, rather than concluding that complications are unacceptably high. (LLM, conf=0.85)
Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.
- Could not verifycites [116] Cook, 2011, Major complications of airway management in the UK: results of the Fourth National Audit Project of the Royal College of Anaesthetists and the Difficult Airway Society. Part 1: anaesthesia, Br J Anaesth sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Emergency surgical airway and Discussion sections report a high failure rate for cannula cricothyroidotomy, but do not identify those attempts as jet ventilation or assess jet-ventilation complications. Searches for “jet ventilation” and “trans-tracheal jet ventilation” found no passage addressing the attributed claim. (LLM, conf=0.70)
- Could not verifycites [117] Langvad, 2013, Emergency cricothyrotomy—a systematic review, Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Methods (Types of interventions; page unavailable) describe how a transtracheal catheter can be used with a jet ventilator, but do not assess complications from jet ventilation. A search for jet-ventilation complications, barotrauma, and adverse events found no passage in our copy calling their rate unacceptably high. (LLM, conf=0.76)
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesThe sources with a verdict support this claim; the rest weren’t checked yet, have no full text we could read, or their verdicts aren’t rated yet.
In the paper
“there is very limited published evidence to support the notion that cervical spine collars and immobilization prevent secondary spinal cord injury.28,29”
§ Airway Management in Traum a > Airway Management in Patients with Suspected Cervical Spine Injuries
What the sources say
- Supportedcites [28] Kwan, 2001, Spinal immobilisation for trauma patients, Cochrane Database Syst Rev source
The Results section reports that no randomised controlled trials of spinal immobilisation strategies in trauma patients were found. The Discussion says their effect on neurological injury remains uncertain, supporting the claim that evidence for preventing secondary spinal cord injury is very limited. The review includes collars among the immobilisation devices considered; it does not establish that they prevent such injury. (LLM, conf=0.91)
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [29] Oteir, 2014, Should suspected cervical spinal cord injuries be immobilised? A systematic review protocol, Inj Prev source
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passes- Supported
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“with 90% of difficult intubations unanticipated”
§ Airway Management in Traum a > TRAUMA AND THE DIFFICULT AIRWAY
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [18] Yentis, 2002, Predicting difficult intubation–worthwhile exercise or pointless ritual?, Anaesthesia source
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [19] Nørskov, 2016, Effects of using the simplified airway risk index vs usual airway assessment on unanticipated difficult tracheal intubation—a cluster randomized trial with 64,273 participants, Br J Anaesth source
- Partly supportedcites [20] Teoh, 2016, Prediction in airway management: what is worthwhile, what is a waste of time and what about the future?, Br J Anaesth sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The article (pp. 3–5) reports that 89–91% of difficult intubations were unanticipated in an analysis that excluded patients initially assigned an alternative intubation method. It then says that exclusion is inappropriate and favors an analysis in which approximately half of difficult intubations were predicted. The unqualified 90% claim omits that condition and the authors’ preferred interpretation. (LLM, conf=0.88)
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [21] Vannucci, 2016, Bedside predictors of difficult intubation: a systematic review, Minerva Anestesiol
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesThe sources with a verdict support this claim; the rest weren’t checked yet, have no full text we could read, or their verdicts aren’t rated yet.
In the paper
“there is a growing body of evidence that prehospital advanced airway management may increase mortality for trauma patients in some circumstances.8,[12][13][14]”
§ Airway Management in Traum a > DOES EARLY DEFINITIVE TRAUMA AIRWAY MANAGEMENT SAVE LIVES?
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [8] Eckstein, 2000, Effect of prehospital advanced life support on outcomes of major trauma patients, J Trauma source
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [12] Stockinger, 2004, Prehospital endotracheal intubation for trauma does not improve survival over bag-valve-mask ventilation, J Trauma source
- Supportedcites [13] Stiell, 2008, The OPALS Major Trauma Study: impact of advanced life-support on survival and morbidity, CMAJ source
The Results (passage 6) report that field intubation was associated with increased mortality among major trauma patients (adjusted OR 2.8, 95% CI 1.6–5.0). The Interpretation (passage 2) likewise reports higher mortality among patients undergoing prehospital endotracheal intubation after adjustment. The claim’s cautious wording reflects an association rather than asserting causation. (LLM, conf=0.93)
- Supportedcites [14] Lecky, 2008, Emergency intubation for acutely ill and injured patients, Cochrane Database Syst Rev source
The Background reports lower 30-day survival among seriously injured patients intubated before or upon hospital arrival, while cautioning that uncontrolled data may reflect other factors. The paper’s study summaries also report higher hospital mortality with paramedic prehospital intubation in some trauma cohorts. These findings support the claim’s qualified wording, not a definitive causal conclusion. (LLM, conf=0.90)
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesThe cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“Given the relatively high incidence of peri-intubation desaturation, hypocapnea, and hypotension in emergency intubations”
§ Airway Management in Traum a > AIRWAY MANAGEMENT TRAUMA SCENARIOS The Head-Injured Patient
What the sources say
- Partly supportedcites [23] Spaite, 2017, The effect of combined out-of-hospital hypotension and hypoxia on mortality in major traumatic brain injury, Ann Emerg Med sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Introduction (Background and Significance; page unavailable) says hypoxia occurs frequently and hypotension is very common during prehospital care of patients with traumatic brain injury. It does not establish their incidence specifically around emergency intubation, and the passages do not address hypocapnea. (LLM, conf=0.86)
- Partly supportedcites [24] Bodily, 2015, Incidence and duration of continuously measured oxygen desaturation during emergency department intubation, Ann Emerg Med sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Main Results report oxygen desaturation in 59 of 166 emergency department rapid sequence intubations (35.5%). The paper does not report incidence rates for peri-intubation hypocapnea or hypotension; its discussion of hemodynamic instability does not establish their incidence. (LLM, conf=0.90)
- Partly supportedcites [25] Gebremedhn, 2014, The incidence of oxygen desaturation during rapid sequence induction and intubation, World J Emerg Med sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Discussion reports a high oxygen-desaturation incidence during rapid sequence induction and intubation (55/153, 35.9%), and the techniques section reports hypotension in 23 patients (15%). The study involved patients undergoing operations under general anesthesia with rapid sequence induction, rather than emergency intubations generally. Our copy does not report an incidence of hypocapnea. (LLM, conf=0.89)
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [26] Heffner, 2012, Predictors of the complication of postintubation hypotension during emergency airway management, J Crit Care source
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passes- Partly supported
The cited sources that could be checked couldn’t confirm or dispute this claim.
In the paper
“Despite significant advances in prehospital care, injury prevention, and the development of trauma systems, early mortality from trauma has essentially remained unchanged.3”
§ Airway Management in Traum a > DOES EARLY DEFINITIVE TRAUMA AIRWAY MANAGEMENT SAVE LIVES?
What the sources say
- Could not verifycites [3] Pieters, 2016, Comparison of seven videolaryngoscopes with the Macintosh laryngoscope in manikins by experienced and novice personnel, Anaesthesia sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The available copy contains bibliographic information identifying a study of laryngoscopes in manikins, but no passage addressing early trauma mortality. Searches for the mortality statement and for prehospital care, injury prevention, and trauma systems found no matching passage; the claim cannot be verified from this copy. (LLM, conf=0.75)
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passes- Could not verify
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“Anatomic markers are in general poor predictors of difficulty with airway management”
§ Airway Management in Traum a > TRAUMA AND THE DIFFICULT AIRWAY
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [18] Yentis, 2002, Predicting difficult intubation–worthwhile exercise or pointless ritual?, Anaesthesia source
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [19] Nørskov, 2016, Effects of using the simplified airway risk index vs usual airway assessment on unanticipated difficult tracheal intubation—a cluster randomized trial with 64,273 participants, Br J Anaesth source
- Partly supportedcites [20] Teoh, 2016, Prediction in airway management: what is worthwhile, what is a waste of time and what about the future?, Br J Anaesth sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
In the main text (page unavailable), the authors report that usual assessment predicted about half of difficult direct-laryngoscopy intubations and that systematically recording seven airway parameters did not improve prediction. This supports limited predictive performance, but the claim generalizes from difficult intubation to airway management overall; the paper also identifies some markers useful for predicting difficulty with other techniques. (LLM, conf=0.84)
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [21] Vannucci, 2016, Bedside predictors of difficult intubation: a systematic review, Minerva Anestesiol
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesEvery source the paper cites for this claim was checked and supports it.
In the paper
“there was no statistically significant difference in first-attempt success between the more commonly used VL devices (GlideScope, C-MAC) and DL. 45”
§ Airway Management in Traum a > Trauma Airway
What the sources say
- Supportedcites [45] Suppan, 2016, Alternative intubation techniques vs Macintosh laryngoscopy in patients with cervical spine immobilization: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials, Br J Anaesth source
The Results section (“Intubation failure at first attempt”) states that first-attempt failure was not significantly different with C-Mac or Glidescope compared with Macintosh laryngoscopy. The finding applies to patients with cervical spine immobilization. (LLM, conf=0.94)
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passes- Supported
- Probably not a substantial claim. 39
- It may state two separate claims as one. 35
- The quote only partly states this claim. 1
Some cited sources support this claim and some don’t — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“administering too small a dose (<1.0 mg/kg) of rocuronium, particularly in low-flow states, will result in inadequate intubating conditions and a larger dose is recommended (1.2-1.6 mg/kg).101,102”
§ Airway Management in Traum a > Optimizing Hemodynamics
What the sources say
- Disputedcites [101] Tran, 2015, Rocuronium versus succinylcholine for rapid sequence induction intubation, Cochrane Database Syst Rev sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Subgroup analysis reports fewer excellent conditions with 0.6–0.7 mg/kg rocuronium than with succinylcholine, but it does not establish that every dose below 1.0 mg/kg produces inadequate conditions. It finds no conclusive evidence that increasing rocuronium doses improves conditions, and the Authors’ conclusions recommend 1 mg/kg when rocuronium is needed—not 1.2–1.6 mg/kg. The cited passages do not address low-flow states. (LLM, conf=0.88)
Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.
- Partly supportedcites [102] Welch, 2016, Update: does rocuronium create better intubating conditions than succinylcholine for rapid sequence intubation?, Ann Emerg Med sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Commentary (page not provided) says rocuronium dose may affect intubating conditions and reports that succinylcholine produced better conditions at rocuronium doses of 0.6–0.7 mg/kg. It does not say that every dose below 1.0 mg/kg causes inadequate conditions: it found no difference at 0.9–1.0 mg/kg. It does not address low-flow states or recommend 1.2–1.6 mg/kg. (LLM, conf=0.88)
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
- Disputed
The sources with a verdict support this claim; the rest weren’t checked yet, have no full text we could read, or their verdicts aren’t rated yet.
In the paper
“Another theoretic concern is that application of MILS results in the need for an increased applied force during laryngoscopy, which paradoxically may lead to more movement during intubation than occurs without MILS.40,41”
§ Airway Management in Traum a > Kovacs & Sowers
What the sources say
- Supportedcites [40] Thiboutot, 2009, Effect of manual in-line stabilization of the cervical spine in adults on the rate of difficult orotracheal intubation by direct laryngoscopy: a randomized controlled trial, Can J Anaesth source
The Discussion reports that laryngoscope-blade pressure doubled with MILS compared with control in a study it cites. It also says that this pressure may be transmitted to the cervical spine and increase the movement MILS is intended to prevent. The citing sentence presents that movement risk as a theoretical concern, consistent with the source. (LLM, conf=0.90)
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [41] LeGrand, 2007, Craniocervical motion during direct laryngoscopy and orotracheal intubation with the Macintosh and Miller blades: an in vivo cinefluoroscopic study, Anesthesiology source
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:conditional· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
- Supported
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“the incidence of c-spine injuries is relatively low (occurring in approximately 2% in the general trauma population”
§ Airway Management in Traum a > Airway Management in Patients with Suspected Cervical Spine Injuries
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [30] Mulligan, 2010, A nationwide review of the associations among cervical spine injuries, head injuries, and facial fractures, J Trauma source
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [31] Dupanovic, 2010, Management of the airway in multitrauma, Curr Opin Anaesthesiol source
- Partly supportedcites [32] Thompson, 2009, Association of injury mechanism with the risk of cervical spine fractures, CJEM sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Characteristics of study subjects section reports that 320 of 17,208 patients (2%) had a clinically important cervical spine injury. The Abstract specifies that these were patients presenting to nine tertiary-care emergency departments after acute blunt trauma to the head or neck, not the general trauma population. The 2% figure is supported, but the claimed population is broader than the study's. (LLM, conf=0.88)
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [33] Manoach, 2007, Manual in-line stabilization for acute airway management of suspected cervical spine injury: historical review and current questions, Ann Emerg Med source
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
The cited sources that could be checked couldn’t confirm or dispute this claim.
In the paper
“and 6%-8% in patients with head and facial trauma)”
§ Airway Management in Traum a > Airway Management in Patients with Suspected Cervical Spine Injuries
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [30] Mulligan, 2010, A nationwide review of the associations among cervical spine injuries, head injuries, and facial fractures, J Trauma source
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [31] Dupanovic, 2010, Management of the airway in multitrauma, Curr Opin Anaesthesiol source
- Could not verifycites [32] Thompson, 2009, Association of injury mechanism with the risk of cervical spine fractures, CJEM sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Characteristics of study subjects section reports cervical spine injury in 320 of 17,208 patients (2%) enrolled after blunt head or neck trauma. Our copy does not report an incidence for patients with head and facial trauma, so it cannot verify the claimed 6%–8% for that group. (LLM, conf=0.72)
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [33] Manoach, 2007, Manual in-line stabilization for acute airway management of suspected cervical spine injury: historical review and current questions, Ann Emerg Med source
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“Although not studied in a clinical setting, the Ducanto suction-assisted laryngoscopy airway decontamination (SALAD) approach has gained acceptance as a method to manage the soiled airway.57,58”
§ Airway Management in Traum a > The Contaminated Airway
What the sources say
- Partly supportedcites [57] DuCanto, 2017, Novel airway training tool that simulates vomiting: suction-assisted laryngoscopy assisted decontamination (SALAD) system, West J Emerg Med sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Introduction describes SALAD as a simulation-based suction approach for managing vomit or blood in the airway, and the Discussion says the study did not evaluate real-world clinical outcomes. The Results report favorable ratings from 40 learners, but do not establish that the approach had gained acceptance as a clinical method for managing soiled airways. Page numbers were not available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.85)
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [58] Brainard, 2015, The art of SUCTIONING, JEMS
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
- Partly supported
The sources with a verdict support this claim; the rest weren’t checked yet, have no full text we could read, or their verdicts aren’t rated yet.
In the paper
“Posterior displacement from fractured maxillofacial segments may cause soft tissue collapse and occlude the airway, which may be worsened by the presence of c-spine collar.64,65”
§ Airway Management in Traum a > Maxillofacial Injuries
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [64] Bowman-Howard, 2000, Management of the traumatized airway
- Supportedcites [65] Jose, 2016, Management of maxillofacial trauma in emergency: an update of challenges and controversies, J Emerg Trauma Shock source
The AIRWAY section says posterior displacement of the maxilla or mandible in multiple facial fractures can decrease airway patency. MANAGEMENT > Initial assessment warns that a spinal collar can inadvertently displace the mandible posteriorly, complicating the airway, and notes that displaced tissue can cause delayed airway compromise. (LLM, conf=0.91)
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:conditional· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“Success with awake intubation is dependent on meticulous airway topicalization, and in general requires an awake and cooperative patient.72,73”
§ Airway Management in Traum a > Management pearls for the patient with a primary airway injury
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [72] Higgs, 2016, Airway management in the critically ill: the same, but different, Br J Anaesth source
- Partly supportedcites [73] Lapinsky, 2015, Endotracheal intubation in the ICU, Crit Care sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The paper’s Abstract says some agitated patients cannot undergo awake intubation and describes using topical anesthetic or a local anesthetic spray in an awake, breathing patient. It does not say success depends on meticulous topicalization or generally requires a fully awake and cooperative patient; it explicitly describes successful awake intubation in ICU patients whose consciousness may be reduced by illness. (LLM, conf=0.85)
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“Most of the literature comparing DL with VL in the bloody or vomitus-filled airway is simulation-based, and concern exists about the vulnerability of VL camera lens in the contaminated airway.55,56”
§ Airway Management in Traum a > The Contaminated Airway
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [55] Ohchi, 2016, Evaluation of gum-elastic bougie combined with direct and indirect laryngoscopes in vomitus setting: a randomized simulation trial, Am J Emerg Med source
- Partly supportedcites [56] Mihara, 2015, Comparison of direct and indirect laryngoscopes in vomitus and hematemesis settings: a randomized simulation trial, Biomed Res Int sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Methods describe a manikin simulation using simulated vomitus and blood, and the Discussion reports that the AWS video monitor was severely disturbed by both contaminants. The Conclusion calls for trials in actual patients. These passages support the simulation example and the concern about a contaminated video view, but do not establish that most of the literature is simulation-based or specifically identify the camera lens as the vulnerable component. Page numbers are unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.87)
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“Literature comparing intubation devices in c-spine immobilized patients has yielded inconsistent findings, and no consensus as to the optimal approach.38,44,45,48,49”
§ Airway Management in Traum a > Trauma Airway
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [38] Crosby, 2006, Airway management in adults after cervical spine trauma, Anesthesiology source
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [44] Michailidou, 2015, A comparison of video laryngoscopy to direct laryngoscopy for the emergency intubation of trauma patients, World J Surg source
- Supportedcites [45] Suppan, 2016, Alternative intubation techniques vs Macintosh laryngoscopy in patients with cervical spine immobilization: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials, Br J Anaesth source
The Results (Intubation failure at first attempt; page unavailable) report a significant reduction with Airtraq but not with four other devices, supporting the description of differing findings across devices. The Discussion (page unavailable) says it remains unclear whether Airtraq should be recommended first and that evidence is insufficient to recommend other devices, supporting the absence of a settled optimal approach. (LLM, conf=0.87)
- Partly supportedcites [48] Kleine-Brueggeney, 2016, Evaluation of six videolaryngoscopes in 720 patients with a simulated difficult airway: a multicentre randomized controlled trial, Br J Anaesth sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Discussion (page unavailable) says the optimal videolaryngoscope may differ with the circumstances of the difficult airway, supporting the absence of one universally optimal device. But it also says prior studies agree that videolaryngoscopes have higher success rates than the Macintosh laryngoscope, so it does not support a blanket characterization of the findings as inconsistent. This trial used simulated cervical-spine immobilization with reduced mouth opening, rather than studying all immobilized patients. (LLM, conf=0.84)
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [49] Norris, 2016, Limitations of videolaryngoscopy, Br J Anaesth source
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
The cited sources that could be checked couldn’t confirm or dispute this claim.
In the paper
“The use of sedation is not routine, and has been associated with increased awake intubation failures.74”
§ Airway Management in Traum a > Management pearls for the patient with a primary airway injury
What the sources say
- Could not verifycites [74] Cook, 2011, Major complications of airway management in the UK: results of the Fourth National Audit Project of the Royal College of Anaesthetists and the Difficult Airway Society. Part 2: intensive care and emergency departments, Br J Anaesth sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Primary airway problem and What do we learn from these observations? sections discuss failed intubation in ICU and emergency departments, but do not identify awake intubation failures or link them to sedation. Searches for awake intubation and sedation found references to sedation holds and tube displacement, not evidence that sedation is non-routine or associated with increased awake intubation failures. Page numbers were unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.76)
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
- Could not verify
Every source the paper cites for this claim was checked and supports it.
In the paper
“and that the scalpel-bougie technique is the technique of choice.89”
§ Airway Management in Traum a > Trauma Airway
What the sources say
- Supportedcites [89] Frerk, 2015, Difficult Airway Society 2015 guidelines for management of unanticipated difficult intubation in adults, Br J Anaesth source
In Plan D, the guidelines recommend adopting a scalpel cricothyroidotomy technique using a bougie for emergency front-of-neck access. The Discussion also recommends that all anaesthetists learn scalpel cricothyroidotomy, while acknowledging that other techniques remain valid. (LLM, conf=0.90)
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim.
- Supported
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“Numerous preparatory airway acronyms and checklists have been proposed to reduce errors and adverse events associated with RSI.85,86”
§ Airway Management in Traum a > RAPID SEQUENCE INTUBATION
What the sources say
- Partly supportedcites [85] Hardy, 2016, BET 2: should real resuscitationists use airway checklists?, Emerg Med J sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Comments section (page not specified) says airway checklists are increasingly adopted in initiatives designed to reduce adverse events and discusses their use to reduce errors. The paper does not describe preparatory airway acronyms, so it supports the checklist portion but not the full claim. (LLM, conf=0.85)
- Partly supportedcites [86] Brindley, 2017, Airway management outside the operating room: how to better prepare, Can J Anaesth sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Background (page not provided) proposes a mnemonic-based checklist for airway interventions outside the operating room, and the Conclusion says the authors believe it is likely to improve performance. The paper does not establish that numerous such tools have been proposed specifically for RSI or that they reduce errors and adverse events; it notes that supporting data for its checklist may be lacking. (LLM, conf=0.85)
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Partly supported
Every source the paper cites for this claim was checked and supports it.
In the paper
“Although rare (0.05%-1.7% of ED-based intubations)”
§ Airway Management in Traum a > FRONT OF NECK AIRWAY TO SECURE THE AIRWAY
What the sources say
- Supportedcites [111] Law, 2013, The difficult airway with recommendations for management—Part 1-Intubation encountered in an unconscious/induced patient, Can J Anaesth source
The Incidence and scope of the problem section, Table 1, lists the approximate incidence of surgical airway in the emergency department as 0.05–1.7%. This supports the cited range for front-of-neck airway; the paper cautions that incidence estimates across studies are difficult to compare directly. (LLM, conf=0.93)
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Supported
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“both succinylcholine and rocuronium may be safely used and can provide good intubating conditions.101”
§ Airway Management in Traum a > Optimizing Hemodynamics
What the sources say
- Partly supportedcites [101] Tran, 2015, Rocuronium versus succinylcholine for rapid sequence induction intubation, Cochrane Database Syst Rev sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Authors’ Conclusions say succinylcholine reliably creates excellent intubating conditions and rocuronium 1 mg/kg can create acceptable conditions as a second-line option. But the Overall completeness and applicability of evidence section explicitly says the review cannot draw conclusions about safety, so it does not support the claim that both may be safely used. (LLM, conf=0.92)
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
- Partly supported
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“Numerous studies have evaluated to effectiveness of HFNO as an adjunct to preoxygenation for RSI, and the balance of evidence suggest the procedure as both safe and effective.104”
§ Airway Management in Traum a > Trauma Airway
What the sources say
- Partly supportedcites [104] Wong, 2017, The effectiveness of apneic oxygenation during tracheal intubation in various clinical settings: a narrative review, Can J Anaesth sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The section on apneic oxygenation in clinical settings reports reduced desaturation in some intubation studies, including one using high-flow nasal oxygen and one involving rapid sequence intubation. But the Conclusion (page unavailable) says most studies were too small to assess serious adverse events and warns that prolonged apneic oxygenation may be risky. The review therefore supports possible effectiveness, not the unqualified claim that HFNO is both safe and effective as an adjunct for RSI. (LLM, conf=0.89)
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
- Partly supported
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“However, recent reviews have shown that complications associated with jet ventilation are unacceptably high and wire-guided approaches are not as easy or successful as once believed.[114][115][116][117]”
§ Airway Management in Traum a > FRONT OF NECK AIRWAY TO SECURE THE AIRWAY
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [114] Duggan, 2016, Transtracheal jet ventilation in the “can’t intubate can’t oxygenate” emergency: a systematic review, Br J Anaesth source
- Could not verifycites [115] Marshall, 2016, Evidence is important: safety considerations for emergency catheter cricothyroidotomy, Acad Emerg Med sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Type and Size of Catheter section reports failures with narrow-gauge catheter puncture, but does not identify those attempts as wire-guided. Searches for wire-guided, guidewire, and Seldinger approaches found no passage assessing their ease or success. The copy therefore does not establish the attributed claim. (LLM, conf=0.76)
- Partly supportedcites [116] Cook, 2011, Major complications of airway management in the UK: results of the Fourth National Audit Project of the Royal College of Anaesthetists and the Difficult Airway Society. Part 1: anaesthesia, Br J Anaesth sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Emergency surgical airway section (page unavailable) reports that 12 of 19 narrow-bore and 3 of 7 wide-bore cannula cricothyroidotomy attempts failed. The Discussion (page unavailable) calls the high failure rate concerning, but the paper does not identify those attempts as wire-guided or assess whether wire-guided approaches were once thought easier or more successful. (LLM, conf=0.78)
- Partly supportedcites [117] Langvad, 2013, Emergency cricothyrotomy—a systematic review, Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Discussion reports that surgical techniques were generally faster than Seldinger-based wire-guided kits, which supports the claim that wire-guided approaches may be less easy than assumed. But it also says both approaches had high success rates and found no statistically significant difference between them; it does not support the claim that wire-guided approaches were less successful than once believed. (LLM, conf=0.86)
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A claim is checked only against the cited paper’s full text, never its abstract, and none is available for its sources.
In the paper
“in the emergency department, 20% to 30% intubations are for trauma.1,2”
§ Airway Management in Traum a > INTRODUCTION
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [1] Brown, 2015, NEAR III Investigators. Techniques, success, and adverse events of emergency department adult intubations, Ann Emerg Med source
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [2] Kerslake, 2015, Tracheal intubation in an urban emergency department in Scotland: a prospective, observational study of 3738 intubations, Resuscitation source
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In contrast to patients with head injury with functional airway obstruction, patients with IBA do not respond to simple airway opening maneuvers alone, and may require brief ventilation support to prevent secondary hypoxic insult.”
§ Airway Management in Traum a > AIRWAY MANAGEMENT TRAUMA SCENARIOS The Head-Injured Patient
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“A proportion of these patients will respond to basic maneuvers, and those who do not usually have more severe, less survivable injuries.”
§ Airway Management in Traum a > AIRWAY MANAGEMENT TRAUMA SCENARIOS The Head-Injured Patient
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A claim is checked only against the cited paper’s full text, never its abstract, and none is available for its sources.
In the paper
“For patients with known or suspected airway injury, the safest way to facilitate ETI is placement of the ETT under direct visualization, ideally from the oropharynx to the carina using an FIE.68,70”
§ Airway Management in Traum a > The Traumatized Airway
What the sources say
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“ventilatory pressures of 20 cm H2O or more are likely to ventilate the stomach, increasing the risk of regurgitation and aspiration.”
§ Airway Management in Traum a > The Contaminated Airway
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“The EAST guidelines recommend that aggressive behavior refractory to initial pharmacologic intervention is a discretionary indication for intubation”
§ Airway Management in Traum a > Consider esophageal ETT diversion connected to suction.
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [15] Mayglothling, 2012, Emergency tracheal intubation immediately following traumatic injury: an Eastern Association for the Surgery of Trauma practice management guideline, J Trauma Acute Care Surg source
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Agitation can be multifactorial and may be the result of head injury, hypoperfusion, hypoxemia, or intoxication.”
§ Airway Management in Traum a > The Uncooperative or Agitated Patient
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:conditional· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Distortion of facial structures may make obtaining a seal with a BVM device difficult and patients may poorly tolerate PPV, as disruption of tissues may result in worsening bleeding and in cases of associated lower airway trauma, significant subcutaneous emphysema.”
§ Airway Management in Traum a > Trauma Airway
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Clinical findings suggestive of significant laryngotracheal airway injury include dysphagia, hoarseness, stridor, bleeding in the upper airway, subcutaneous emphysema, expanding hematoma, or in open penetrating injuries, obvious disruption of the larynx or trachea.”
§ Airway Management in Traum a > The Traumatized Airway
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“practitioners have infrequent or limited experience in managing these patients and existing management guidelines for care of these patients are mostly based on expert opinion.68”
§ Airway Management in Traum a > The Traumatized Airway
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [68] Mercer, 2016, Systematic review of the anaesthetic management of non-iatrogenic acute adult airway trauma, Br J Anaesth source
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Adherence to protocols requiring rigid spinal immobilization and supine positioning may result in catastrophe.”
§ Airway Management in Traum a > Maxillofacial Injuries
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Recently, Sakles and colleagues 54 retrospectively reviewed more than 4600 intubations and demonstrated that, although airway contamination was associated with a decreased first-attempt success rate, this was irrespective of the choice of GlideScope or DL as the first-attempt device used.”
§ Airway Management in Traum a > The Contaminated Airway
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [54] Sakles, 2017, The impact of a soiled airway on intubation success in the Emergency Department when using the GlideScope or the direct laryngoscope, Acad Emerg Med source
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Airway management for the patient with a primary injury to the larynx or trachea is a high-stakes scenario, in which the loss of a stable airway can happen rapidly and with little warning.”
§ Airway Management in Traum a > The Traumatized Airway
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Historically, the application of cricoid pressure (CP) to prevent passive aspiration has been considered an essential component of an RSI.”
§ Airway Management in Traum a > RAPID SEQUENCE INTUBATION
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Uncooperative, violent, or agitated patients can encumber adequate assessment, leading to missed injuries and inadequate resuscitation.”
§ Airway Management in Traum a > The Uncooperative or Agitated Patient
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
In the paper
“One option to improve visual navigation past the airway injury is to use a VL-assisted flexible endoscopic intubation.71”
§ Airway Management in Traum a > The Traumatized Airway
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [71] Sowers, 2016, Use of a flexible intubating scope in combination with a channeled video laryngoscope for managing a difficult airway in the emergency department, J Emerg Med source
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:conditional· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“However, the use of any sedative, particularly in the presence of other intoxicating ingestions, may inhibit airway reflexes.”
§ Airway Management in Traum a > Consider esophageal ETT diversion connected to suction.
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:conditional· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“A successful awake intubation is dependent on careful patient selection, and, in particular, identifying anatomic, pathologic, or physiologic features that would make RSI problematic.”
§ Airway Management in Traum a > THE AWAKE INTUBATION
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“A difficult airway paradox exists here: patients identified as difficult are selected to undergo a technically more challenging awake approach, a procedure that is performed infrequently by most emergency physicians.”
§ Airway Management in Traum a > Management pearls for the patient with a primary airway injury
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In the supine position, the pooling of blood in the oropharynx may stimulate a gag response or vomiting, which in turn may worsen bleeding.”
§ Airway Management in Traum a > Maxillofacial Injuries
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:conditional· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“swelling and tenderness at the temporomandibular joints suggests the presence of condylar factures and the possibility of mechanical trismus.”
§ Airway Management in Traum a > Trauma Airway
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Use of an FIE allows both a diagnostic and therapeutic advantage: visualizing the specific pattern of injury, and facilitating careful ETT placement, while avoiding conversion to a complete transection.”
§ Airway Management in Traum a > The Traumatized Airway
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Maxillofacial fractures may also cause trismus that may resolve with the neuromuscular blockade; however, differentiating this from a mechanical obstruction before intubation is required and is often difficult.”
§ Airway Management in Traum a > Maxillofacial Injuries
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:conditional· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In the uncommon circumstance in which blood or vomit is overwhelming these management strategies, intubation is not possible and the patient is critically desaturating, rescue oxygenation with a BVM (bag-valvemask) or SGA (supraglottic airway) is unlikely to work and an FONA approach is indicated.”
§ Airway Management in Traum a > The Contaminated Airway
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Safely managing both the anticipated and unanticipated difficult airway requires technical expertise; however, decisions of when and how to intervene are equally important determinants of outcome.”
§ Airway Management in Traum a > SUMMARY
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✗ Checkable: fails✓ Load-bearing: passes✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“However, its routine use remains controversial, with some evidence suggesting it may make various aspects of airway management more challenging.”
§ Airway Management in Traum a > RAPID SEQUENCE INTUBATION
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:conditional· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Inadequate resuscitation of hemorrhagic shock, transition to PPV, loss of sympathetic drive associated with general anesthesia, and the hemodynamic effect of many induction drugs are all contributing factors.”
§ Airway Management in Traum a > Optimizing Hemodynamics
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Then, securing the airway will have the best chance of making a positive difference in trauma patient outcomes.”
§ Airway Management in Traum a > SUMMARY
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The quote only partly states this claim.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Airway management in trauma begins as soon as patient contact is made and rarely starts with placement of an ETT.”
§ Airway Management in Traum a > SUMMARY
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Hemodynamic instability in trauma is most commonly caused by hypovolemia due to hemorrhage.”
§ Airway Management in Traum a > Optimizing Hemodynamics
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Paralysis should have no direct effect on the patient's hemodynamic status”
§ Airway Management in Traum a > Optimizing Hemodynamics
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Whether the team is a doctor, nurse, and transporting paramedics or a group of 10, success is dependent on a shared understanding of the importance of resuscitation before intubation and clear communication of what and when various airway interventions will be performed.”
§ Airway Management in Traum a > SUMMARY
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Vasopressors have traditionally been avoided in trauma based on concerns that they may worsen bleeding.”
§ Airway Management in Traum a > Optimizing Hemodynamics
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:conditional· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Effective trauma care requires a team approach, with resuscitation priorities clearly communicated and interventions guided by the physiologic priorities that ensure adequate oxygen delivery.”
§ Airway Management in Traum a > SUMMARY
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✗ Checkable: fails✓ Load-bearing: passes✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The scalpel-bougie technique has several advantages for the emergency clinician: it relies on gross motor skills (which are more likely to be preserved during periods of acute stress), uses familiar equipment (scalpel, bougie, and a #6 ETT), and has a minimal number of steps.”
§ Airway Management in Traum a > Trauma Airway
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Providing advanced airway management is part of the A and B and C parallel resuscitative priorities of trauma care.”
§ Airway Management in Traum a > SUMMARY
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Having the sick trauma patient wake up to a state that he or she will be able rescue his or her own airway is simply not realistic, and will make efforts to secure the airway even more difficult.”
§ Airway Management in Traum a > Optimizing Hemodynamics
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✗ Checkable: fails✓ Load-bearing: passes✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“extended, deep paralysis is in fact desirable in this circumstance, as it helps to create optimal conditions for laryngoscopy, BVM and SGA ventilation, and FONA.”
§ Airway Management in Traum a > Optimizing Hemodynamics
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Intravascular depletion shifts the gradient between right atrial pressure Trauma Airway and mean systemic pressure, reducing preload and subsequently mean arterial pressure.”
§ Airway Management in Traum a > Optimizing Hemodynamics
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Gaining intravenous access, beginning fluid resuscitation, and applying oxygen may be lifesaving and/or bridging interventions that allow for the safe execution of downstream more definitive procedures.”
§ Airway Management in Traum a > SUMMARY
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
The paper relies on this without support.
Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is the most common cause of mortality in trauma patients.
“Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is the most common cause of mortality in trauma patients.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Airway management in TBI patients is often performed for airway protection.
“Airway management in this cohort of patients is often performed for airway protection.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Severe or catastrophic brain injury is usually nonsurvivable, and associated with early death.
“Severe or catastrophic brain injury is usually nonsurvivable, and associated with early death.”
The authors state this as an assumption.
Structural collapse of the airway may occur during an RSI.
“Practitioners must proceed with the assumption that structural collapse of the airway may occur during an RSI.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Proceeding with an RSI in a patient who is already hypoxemic can result in catastrophic complications.
“Proceeding with an RSI in a patient who is already hypoxemic can result in catastrophic complications.”
The paper relies on this without support.
High oxygen saturation is not a true measurement of oxygen reserve.
“Although high oxygen saturation is reassuring, it is not a true measurement of oxygen reserve.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Increasing the oxygen reserve has three components: denitrogenation of the lungs, recruitment of alveoli with PEEP, and apneic oxygenation.
“Increasing the oxygen reserve has 3 components: denitrogenation of the lungs, recruitment of alveoli with PEEP, and apneic oxygenation.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Denitrogenation is the primary physiologic mechanism of preoxygenation and is dependent on delivery of a high concentration of oxygen, resulting in a 10-fold increase in available oxygen.
“Denitrogenation is the primary physiologic mechanism of preoxygenation and is dependent on delivery of a high concentration of oxygen, resulting in a 10-fold increase available oxygen.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Increased functional residual capacity provides an ongoing reservoir to keep hemoglobin saturated.
“Increased functional residual capacity (FRC) provides an ongoing reservoir to keep hemoglobin saturated.”
The paper relies on this without support.
A PEEP valve attached to a bag-valve-mask and applied over conventional nasal prongs at high flow (15 LPM) in a spontaneously breathing patient will produce continuous positive airway pressure-like conditions.
“A PEEP valve attached to a BVM and applied over conventional nasal prongs at high flow (15 LPM) in a spontaneously breathing patient will produce continuous positive airway pressure-like conditions.”
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.
Shock index is defined in opposite ways
MinorThe main text defines shock index as heart rate divided by systolic blood pressure, but the Figure 5 caption reverses the ratio. This affects interpretation of the stated risk threshold of greater than 0.8.
“Patients with a shock index (defined as heart rate divided by SBP) of greater than 0.8 are at particular risk of developing significant hypotension in the postintubation period.”
“SI: shock index (SBP/HR)”
Citations
Cites
Cook, T. M., Woodall, N., & Frerk, C. (2011) · British Journal of Anaesthesia · doi:10.1093/bja/aer058 · Cited by 2,415
Frerk, C., Mitchell, V. S., McNarry, A. F., Mendonca, C., Bhagrath, R., Patel, A., O’Sullivan, E. P., Woodall, N. M., & Ahmad, I. (2015) · British Journal of Anaesthesia · doi:10.1093/bja/aev371 · Cited by 2,214
Cook, T. M., Woodall, N., Harper, J., & Benger, J. (2011) · British Journal of Anaesthesia · doi:10.1093/bja/aer059 · Cited by 1,065
Preoxygenation and prevention of desaturation during emergency airway management
Weingart, S. D., & Levitan, R. M. (2012) · Annals of Emergency Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.annemergmed.2011.10.002 · Cited by 554
Techniques, Success, and Adverse Events of Emergency Department Adult Intubations
Brown, C. A., Bair, A. E., Pallin, D. J., & Walls, R. M. (2015) · Annals of Emergency Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.annemergmed.2014.10.036 · Cited by 431
Preoxygenation: physiologic basis, benefits, and potential risks
Nimmagadda, U., Salem, M. R., & Crystal, G. J. (2017) · Anesthesia & Analgesia · doi:10.1213/ane.0000000000001589 · Cited by 404
Airway management in adults after cervical spine trauma
Crosby, E. T., & Warltier, D. C. (2006) · Anesthesiology · doi:10.1097/00000542-200606000-00026 · Cited by 401
Rocuronium versus succinylcholine for rapid sequence induction intubation
Tran, D. T., Newton, E. K., Mount, V. A., Lee, J. S., Wells, G. A., & Perry, J. J. (2015) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd002788.pub3 · Cited by 391
for the Canadian Airway Focus Group, Law, J. A., Broemling, N., Cooper, R. M., Drolet, P., Duggan, L. V., Griesdale, D. E., Hung, O. R., Jones, P. M., Kovacs, G., et al. (2013) · Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d'anesthésie · doi:10.1007/s12630-013-0019-3 · Cited by 358
Self-citationPredicting difficult intubation–worthwhile exercise or pointless ritual?
(2002) · Anaesthesia · doi:10.1046/j.0003-2409.2001.02515.x · Cited by 280
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 3
- Levitan, 2015, Tips for using a hyperangulated video laryngoscope, ACEP Now
- Levitan, 2015, Timing resuscitation sequence intubation for critically ill patients, ACEP Now
- Levitan, 2013, Levitan, the laryngeal handshake and the cartilaginous cage, PHARM Prehospital Retr Med
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Advancing emergency airway management practice and research
Goto, T., Goto, Y., Hagiwara, Y., Okamoto, H., Watase, H., & Hasegawa, K. (2019) · Acute Medicine & Surgery · doi:10.1002/ams2.428 · Cited by 70
Managing and securing the bleeding upper airway: a narrative review
Kristensen, M. S., & McGuire, B. E. (2019) · Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d anesthésie · doi:10.1007/s12630-019-01479-5 · Cited by 51
Gómez‐Ríos, M. Á., Sastre, J. A., Onrubia-Fuertes, X., López, T., Gurumeta, A. A., Casans‐Francés, R., Gómez-Ríos, D., Garzón, J. C., Martínez-Pons, V., Casalderrey-Rivas, M., et al. (2024) · Revista Española de Anestesiología y Reanimación (English Edition) · doi:10.1016/j.redare.2024.02.002 · Cited by 49
Gómez‐Ríos, M. Á., Sastre, J. A., Onrubia-Fuertes, X., López, T., Gurumeta, A. A., Casans‐Francés, R., Gómez-Ríos, D., Garzón, J. C., Martínez-Pons, V., Casalderrey-Rivas, M., et al. (2023) · Revista Española de Anestesiología y Reanimación · doi:10.1016/j.redar.2023.08.001 · Cited by 47
High-Risk Airway Management in the Emergency Department. Part I: Diseases and Approaches
Lentz, S. A., Grossman, A., Koyfman, A., & Long, B. (2020) · Journal of Emergency Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.jemermed.2020.05.008 · Cited by 38
Bandyopadhyay, A., Kumar, P., Jafra, A., Thakur, H., Yaddanapudi, L. N., & Jain, K. (2023) · Anesthesia & Analgesia · doi:10.1213/ane.0000000000006171 · Cited by 31
Petrosoniak, A., Lu, M., Gray, S. H., Hicks, C. M., Sherbino, J., McGowan, M., & Monteiro, S. (2019) · BMC Medical Education · doi:10.1186/s12909-019-1537-7 · Cited by 30
Sunde, G. A., Bjerkvig, C. K., Bekkevold, M., Kristoffersen, E. K., Strandenes, G., Bruserud, Ø., Apelseth, T. O., & Heltne, J.-K. (2022) · Scandinavian Journal of Trauma Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine · doi:10.1186/s13049-022-01051-z · Cited by 27
Chan, M., Fehlmann, C. A., Pasquier, M., Suppan, L., & Savoldelli, G. L. (2020) · Journal of Clinical Medicine · doi:10.3390/jcm9010238 · Cited by 27
Lin, L.-W., Huang, C., Ong, J. R., Chong, C., Wu, N.-Y., & Hung, S.-W. (2019) · Medicine · doi:10.1097/md.0000000000017898 · Cited by 18
Trauma in the Aging Population
Lau, L. W., Ajzenberg, H., Haas, B., & Wong, C. L. (2022) · Emergency Medicine Clinics of North America · doi:10.1016/j.emc.2022.09.006 · Cited by 14
CT findings of non-neoplastic central airways diseases
Moroni, C., Bindi, A., Cavigli, E., Cozzi, D., Luvarà, S., Smorchkova, O., Zantonelli, G., Miele, V., & Bartolucci, M. (2021) · Japanese Journal of Radiology · doi:10.1007/s11604-021-01190-w · Cited by 15
Traumatic brain injury and RSI is rocuronium or succinylcholine preferred?
Dao, A. Q., Mohapatra, S. G., Kuza, C. M., & Moon, T. S. (2022) · Current Opinion in Anaesthesiology · doi:10.1097/aco.0000000000001225 · Cited by 14
Securing the Airway in Maxillofacial Trauma Patients: A Systematic Review of Techniques
Patel, A., Saadi, R. A., & Lighthall, J. G. (2020) · Craniomaxillofacial Trauma & Reconstruction · doi:10.1177/1943387520950096 · Cited by 12
Pan, Y., Zhu, H., & Hou, L. (2022) · Annals of Palliative Medicine · doi:10.21037/apm-21-2995 · Cited by 12
High-Risk Airway Management in the Emergency Department: Diseases and Approaches, Part II
Lentz, S. A., Grossman, A., Koyfman, A., & Long, B. (2020) · Journal of Emergency Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.jemermed.2020.05.009 · Cited by 12
Estimé, S. R., & Kuza, C. M. (2018) · Anesthesiology Clinics · doi:10.1016/j.anclin.2018.09.002 · Cited by 11
Current Approaches to the Treatment of Traumatic Shock (Review)
Остапченко, Д. А., Gutnikov, A. I., & Davydova, L. A. (2021) · General Reanimatology · doi:10.15360/1813-9779-2021-4-65-76 · Cited by 11
Recent Advances in Prehospital and In-Hospital Management of Patients with Severe Trauma
Kim, J.-Y., & Kim, O. H. (2025) · Journal of Clinical Medicine · doi:10.3390/jcm14072208 · Cited by 10
Cailleau, L., Geeraerts, T., Minville, V., Fourcade, O. A., Fernandez, T. V., Bazin, J. E., Baxter, L. S., Athanassoglou, V., Jefferson, H., Sud, A., et al. (2023) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0281016 · Cited by 10
Okada, Y., Hashimoto, K., Ishii, W., Iiduka, R., & Koike, K. (2019) · Anaesthesia · doi:10.1111/anae.14895 · Cited by 10
Urdiales, A. I. A., Struck, G. T., Guetter, C. R., Yaegashi, C. H., Temperly, K. S., Abreu, P., Tomasich, F. D. S., & Campos, A. C. L. (2020) · Revista do Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgiões · doi:10.1590/0100-6991e-20202522 · Cited by 10
Emergency trauma laparotomy and/or thoracotomy in the emergency department: risks and benefits
Ito, K., Nakazawa, K., Nagao, T., Chiba, H., Miyake, Y., Sakamoto, T., & Fujita, T. (2019) · Trauma Surgery & Acute Care Open · doi:10.1136/tsaco-2018-000269 · Cited by 9
Emerling, A. D., Bianchi, W., Krzyżaniak, M., Deaton, T. G., Via, D. K., Archer, B. H., Sutherland, J., Shannon, K. B., Dye, J. L., Clouser, M. C., et al. (2021) · Military Medicine · doi:10.1093/milmed/usaa356 · Cited by 8
Emergency airway management in a Singapore centre: A registry study
Chan, G. W. H., Chai, C. Y., Teo, J. S.-Y., Tjio, C. K. E., Chua, M. T., & Brown, C. A. (2021) · Annals of the Academy of Medicine Singapore · doi:10.47102/annals-acadmedsg.2020331 · Cited by 7
Giraldo, D. G., Largo-Pineda, C. E., & Zamudio, M. (2020) · Colombian Journal of Anesthesiology · doi:10.1097/cj9.0000000000000139 · Cited by 7
Einfach und praktisch: „Suction-Assisted Laryngoscopy and Airway Decontamination“ (SALAD)
Glatz, C., Althaus, S., Grundgeiger, J., Damjanović, D., & Thiemann, S. (2020) · Notfall + Rettungsmedizin · doi:10.1007/s10049-020-00740-5 · Cited by 6
Wend, C. M., Fransman, R. B., & Haut, E. R. (2023) · Surgical Clinics of North America · doi:10.1016/j.suc.2023.10.005 · Cited by 5
Trauma Bay Evaluation and Resuscitative Decision-Making
Leeper, W. R., & James, N. (2024) · Surgical Clinics of North America · doi:10.1016/j.suc.2024.01.002 · Cited by 4
The Initial Approach to the Multisystem Pediatric Trauma Patient
Hannon, M., Middelberg, L. K., & Lee, L. K. (2022) · Pediatric Emergency Care · doi:10.1097/pec.0000000000002722 · Cited by 4
Vlatten, A., Dumbarton, T. C., Vlatten, D., & Law, J. A. (2022) · The American Journal of Emergency Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.ajem.2022.06.059 · Cited by 4
Mauro, G. J., Armando, G., Cabillón, L. N., Benitez, S. T., Mogliani, S., Roldan, A., Vilca, M., Rollie, R., & Martins, G. (2024) · Medicina Intensiva · doi:10.1016/j.medin.2023.06.003 · Cited by 4
Primary Assessment and Care in Maxillofacial Trauma
Saigal, S., & Khan, M. M. (2021) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-981-15-1346-6_48 · Cited by 4
Airway management in trauma patients: A seven-year review of emergency department intubations
Lin, L. C., April, M. D., Douin, D. J., Winkle, J. M., Jenson, W. R., Rizzo, J. A., & Schauer, S. G. (2025) · The American Journal of Emergency Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.ajem.2025.10.023 · Cited by 3
Key strategies in trauma anesthesia for severe hemorrhage: a narrative review
Kang, B. H., & Sohn, H.-M. (2025) · Korean Journal of Anesthesiology · doi:10.4097/kja.25734 · Cited by 3
Blunt and Penetrating Airway Trauma
Duggan, L. V., Doyle, L., Zunder, J. S., & Hanna, M. (2023) · Emergency Medicine Clinics of North America · doi:10.1016/j.emc.2022.10.001 · Cited by 3
Londoño, M. E., Nahmias, J. T., Dolich, M. O., Lekawa, M. E., Kong, A. P., Schubl, S. D., Inaba, K., & Grigorian, A. (2023) · Surgery Open Science · doi:10.1016/j.sopen.2023.09.017 · Cited by 3
Steffensen, T. L., Bartnes, B., Fuglstad, M. L., Auflem, M., & Steinert, M. (2023) · Frontiers in Robotics and AI · doi:10.3389/frobt.2023.1218174 · Cited by 5
Enjeux de la prise en charge préhospitalière des polytraumatismes
Dupont, A., & Pinsson, J. (2025) · Oxymag · doi:10.1016/j.oxy.2024.12.003 · Cited by 3
Bola, S., Osuji, J., Rivero-Bosch, M., & Corbridge, R. (2025) · Journal of Clinical Medicine · doi:10.3390/jcm14134717 · Cited by 3
Secuencia rápida de intubación en el servicio de urgencias: revisión actualizada de la literatura.
Pérez, J. A. P., Mahecha, F. E. N., Hernandez, N., Granda, C., Moreno, A., Camargo, J. F., & Tovar, C. A. (2021) · Universitas Médica · doi:10.11144/javeriana.umed62-4.sris · Cited by 3
High-Frequency Ventilation in the Treatment of Acute Respiratory Failure
Перепелица, С. А., & Kuzovlev, A. N. (2021) · Physical and rehabilitation medicine medical rehabilitation · doi:10.36425/rehab63248 · Cited by 2
Tracheal Penetrating Injury and Airway Management: A Review of Two Cases
Pan, P., Liu, T., Li, W., & Bo, Y. (2024) · Journal of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia · doi:10.1053/j.jvca.2024.05.017 · Cited by 2
Atassi, G., Louro, J., Hneiny, L., & Dudaryk, R. (2025) · Anesthesia & Analgesia · doi:10.1213/ane.0000000000007804 · Cited by 2
What's new in critical illness and injury science? A look into trauma airway management
Stahl, J., & Miller, A. (2020) · International Journal of Critical Illness and Injury Science · doi:10.4103/ijciis.ijciis_14_20 · Cited by 2
Ferrer, J. C. M. J., Chavira, A. L., Ramírez, M. A. P., Barragán, G. D. R. P. D. L. R., & Magdaleno, J. A. R. (2022) · Anales Médicos de la Asociación Médica del Centro Médico ABC · doi:10.35366/106026 · Cited by 2
Catastrophic pulmonary haemorrhage after endobronchial biopsy of necrotic lung mass
Partridge, D., Eilert, R., & Newton, F. A. (2022) · Respirology Case Reports · doi:10.1002/rcr2.1015 · Cited by 2
Tracheal Intubation Difficulties: Systematic Literature Review
da Costa, V. F. D. D., Barauna, M. R., Leite, C. D. S., & Pires, O. C. (2022) · Journal of Biosciences and Medicines · doi:10.4236/jbm.2022.105009 · Cited by 2
Clinical Approach to Massive Hemoptysis: Perioperative Focus on Causes and Management
Toh, T. W., Goh, J. H. F., Lie, S. A., Leong, C. K., & Hwang, N. C. (2024) · Journal of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia · doi:10.1053/j.jvca.2024.06.002 · Cited by 2
Vomit, Blood, and Secretions: Dealing with the Contaminated Airway in Trauma
Root, C. W., Pirotte, A. P., & DuCanto, J. (2024) · Current anesthesiology reports · doi:10.1007/s40140-024-00652-x · Cited by 2
Aramvanitch, K., Leela-Amornsin, S., Tienpratarn, W., Nuanprom, P., Aussavanodom, S., Yuksen, C., Boonsri, S., Boonjarus, N., & Sanepim, S. (2025) · Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management · doi:10.2147/tcrm.s486978 · Cited by 2
Acil Operasyonlar ve Anestezi Dağılım Analizi: Retrospektif Çalışma
Çelik, F., Dağlı, R., & Cantürk, M. (2019) · Selçuk Tıp Dergisi · doi:10.30733/std.2019.01145 · Cited by 2
Devendra Prasad, K. J., & Shekar, B. (2021) · Journal of Evidence Based Medicine and Healthcare · doi:10.18410/jebmh/2021/55 · Cited by 2
Current status of point of care ultrasonography for the perioperative care of trauma patients
Heinz, E. R., Keneally, R. J., d’Empaire, P. P., & Vincent, A. (2022) · Current Opinion in Anaesthesiology · doi:10.1097/aco.0000000000001229 · Cited by 1
Clinical Diagnosis and Management of Traumatic Acute Intracranial Subdural Hematoma: Review Article
Darah, O. M. O., Elzohiery, M. A., Rashed, M. E.-S. H., & Elmesallamy, W. A. E. A. (2023) · The Egyptian Journal of Hospital Medicine · doi:10.21608/ejhm.2023.294352 · Cited by 1
Uzun, D. D., Schneider, N. R. E., Liao, S., Schmitt, F. C. F., Weigand, M. A., Kreinest, M., Popp, E., & Weilbacher, F. (2025) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-025-09724-2 · Cited by 1
Perioperative and Anesthetic Considerations in Maxillofacial Trauma
Sahu, S., Verma, N., & Jain, D. (2021) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-981-33-6338-0_7 · Cited by 1
Heister mouth gag aided endotracheal intubation in patients with maxillofacial trauma
Singla, K., Samra, T., & Jain, K. (2022) · International Journal of Critical Illness and Injury Science · doi:10.4103/ijciis.ijciis_15_22 · Cited by 1
Airway Management in Trauma Patients
Villegas, W., & Lawson, T. (2023) · Critical Care Nursing Clinics of North America · doi:10.1016/j.cnc.2023.02.003 · Cited by 1
Mauro, G. J., Armando, G., Cabillón, L. N., Benitez, S. T., Mogliani, S., Roldan, A., Vilca, M., Rollie, R., & Martins, G. (2023) · Medicina Intensiva (English Edition) · doi:10.1016/j.medine.2023.06.007 · Cited by 1
Anaesthesia for maxillofacial trauma
Harper, K., Niciu, C., & Fitzpatrick, K. (2023) · Anaesthesia & intensive care medicine · doi:10.1016/j.mpaic.2023.05.006 · Cited by 1
Ramakkannu, K., Theagrajan, A., Prabhu, M., & Ramkumar, V. (2024) · Cureus · doi:10.7759/cureus.53791 · Cited by 1
Kim, O. H. (2024) · Journal of Korean Medical Association · doi:10.5124/jkma.2024.67.12.723 · Cited by 1
Airway Management in Accident and Emergency
Saraçoğlu, K. T., Çakmak, G., & Saraçoğlu, A. (2021) · IntechOpen eBooks · doi:10.5772/intechopen.96477 · Cited by 1
Manobras de desobstrução e acesso as vias aéreas nas emergências odontológicas
de Lima, L. M. A. C., de Lima, M. A. C., de Lima, R. C. C., Pinheiro, M. M. V. A. D. M., de Melo, R. H. M. V. A., Rhoden, D. L. B., de Melo, V. L. M. V. A., de Melo, F. M. V. A., de Melo, B. H. C. V. A., Beck, J. D. S., et al. (2022) · Research Society and Development · doi:10.33448/rsd-v11i1.25272 · Cited by 1
Management of traumatic brain injury from the aspect of emergency department and case studies
Sönmez, B. M. (2022) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-823347-4.00034-8 · Cited by 1
Li, C., Chuang, C., Chen, C., Tu, P., Hsu, T., Kuo, Y., Liao, C., Hsieh, C., & Fu, C. (2022) · World Journal of Surgery · doi:10.1007/s00268-022-06747-y · Cited by 1
Sport‐Related Traumatic Brain Injury
Ahluwalia, R., Mummareddy, N., Bonfield, C. M., & Yengo-Kahn, A. M. (2020) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9780470015902.a0025799 · Cited by 1
Adam's apple and airway obstruction
Hwang, K. (2021) · Journal of Trauma and Injury · doi:10.20408/jti.2021.0040 · Cited by 1
Niciu, C., Cunningham, V., & Fitzpatrick, K. (2017) · Anaesthesia & intensive care medicine · doi:10.1016/j.mpaic.2017.06.003
An air powered gunshot wound to the chest, pellet missing with a trace
Slagt, C. (2018) · Science Repository OÜ eBooks · doi:10.31487/j.scr.2018.03.017
Tatalaksana Jalan Napas pada Pasien dengan Fraktur Listesis Servikal Tidak Stabil
Rahmatisa, D., Sudadi, S., & Bambang Suryono, S. (2019) · Jurnal Neuroanestesi Indonesia · doi:10.24244/jni.vol8i1.210
Bılge, S., Tezel, O., Acar, Y. A., Aydin, G., Aydın, A., & Özkan, G. (2019) · Emergency Medicine International · doi:10.1155/2019/5804260
Intubation concerns in maxillofacial trauma patients
Khan, K. Z., Bibi, J., & Qayyum, M. U. (2020) · Anaesthesia Pain & Intensive Care · doi:10.35975/apic.v22i1.1199
A year in review in Minerva Anestesiologica 2019. Anesthesia, analgesia, and perioperative medicine
Cavaliere, F., Allegri, M., Apan, A., Calderini, E., Carassiti, M., Cohen, E., Coluzzi, F., Marco, P. D., Langeron, O., Rossi, M., et al. (2020) · Minerva Anestesiologica · doi:10.23736/s0375-9393.20.14424-9
Eshetie, D., Getinet, H., Abdissa, Z. D., & Temesgen, M. M. (2020) · International Journal of Surgery Open · doi:10.1016/j.ijso.2020.09.002
Pre-hospital and Trauma Airway Management
Rognås, L. K., & Lockey, D. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108303477.032
Turkstra, T. P., & Regan, W. D. (2021) · Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d anesthésie · doi:10.1007/s12630-021-02115-x
2021 CAS VIRTUAL ANNUAL MEETING Abstracts and Case Report/Series
(2021) · Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d anesthésie · doi:10.1007/s12630-021-02074-3
Lewis, G., Niciu, C., & Fitzpatrick, K. (2020) · Anaesthesia & intensive care medicine · doi:10.1016/j.mpaic.2020.06.005
Pre‐hospital video‐assisted flexible bronchoscope rapid sequence intubation
Gowen, E., Harris, D., Teubner, D. J., & Lacquiere, D. A. (2022) · Emergency Medicine Australasia · doi:10.1111/1742-6723.14030
Intubating Special Populations
Somwaru, B., & Grossman, D. (2022) · Emergency Medicine Clinics of North America · doi:10.1016/j.emc.2022.05.001
MKG-Notfälle erkennen und behandeln – Teil 2: Trauma & Atemwegsverlegungen
Wilkat, M., & Rana, M. (2022) · Notaufnahme up2date · doi:10.1055/a-1703-2218
Maksillofasiyal Travma ve Zor Havayolu Yönetimi: İki Olgu Sunumu
Çelik, E., Bıçak, M., & Akelma, H. (2022) · Artuklu International Journal of Health Sciences · doi:10.58252/artukluder.1185425
Darshini, S., Vyshnavi, S., & Ubaradka, R. S. (2023) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-981-19-4747-6_29
Pérez, D. A., Gallardo, Á. J. L., & Galvez, J. A. (2023) · Medicina Clínica y Social · doi:10.52379/mcs.v7i3.296
Jurišić, I. (2023) · Acta Clinica Croatica · doi:10.20471/acc.2023.62.s1.19
Soleimani, M. A., Fattahi, Z., Yekefallah, L., & Ranjbaran, M. (2023) · Avicenna Journal of Nursing and Midwifery Care · doi:10.32592/ajnmc.31.3.165
OS AGRAVOS EM PACIENTES SUBMETIDOS À CRICOTIREOIDOSTOMIA CIRÚRGICA.
Costa, M. F. B. R. D. M., cortez, V., Trigueiro, L. S., Escossio, E. F., Cohen, J. C. D. C., MARQUES, E. P., & Leite, M. B. (2023) · Congresso Amazonense de Medicina de Emergência (COAMME) · doi:10.29327/1292343.1-22
Lima, P. M., Adams, M., Pinto, S. G., & Mexêdo, C. (2023) · Cureus · doi:10.7759/cureus.50735
Edgar, M. C., Zabawa, L., Jiang, S. H., Mumuni, S., & Hutchinson, M. R. (2023) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-33867-0_15
Deprem nedenli çoklu travma hastalarına ilk yaklaşım
DEVECİ, M. A., & Şenköylü, K. (2023) · Türk Ortopedi ve Travmatoloji Birliği Derneği · doi:10.5578/totbid.dergisi.2023.83
Yadav, M., Ahuja, N., & Singh, A. (2024) · Journal of Cellular & Molecular Anesthesia · doi:10.5812/jcma-146538
Anatomist’s View of Artistic Works
Hwang, K. (2024) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-981-97-1864-1_1
Risk factors for early death in severe non-brain-injured trauma patients
Feng, H., Shao, R., Fan, Z., Ma, L., Gao, J., Liu, L., Fang, L., & Zhu, J. (2024) · World Journal of Emergency Medicine · doi:10.5847/wjem.j.1920-8642.2024.061
Surgical damage control: How I do a surgical cricothyroidotomy (with video)
de Ponthaud, C., Gaujoux, S., & Boddaert, G. (2024) · Surgery Open Digestive Advance · doi:10.1016/j.soda.2024.100160
Airway Management in the Neurointensive Care Unit
Urdaneta, F., Tsai, Y.-C. M., & Parotto, M. (2024) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-62224-3_4
Vocal Cords Detection Using Edge Detection and Machine Learning Filtration
Alshoweky, M., Amira, A., Kurugöllü, F., Soudan, B., & Oulefki, A. (2024) · Global Digital Health Knowledge Exchange & Empowerment Conference (gDigiHealth.KEE) · doi:10.1109/gdigihealth.kee62309.2024.10761292
General Anaesthesia in the Context of Haemorrhagic Shock and Trauma
Bonanno, F. (2025) · IntechOpen eBooks · doi:10.5772/intechopen.1008299
Metadata
- Authors
- Kovacs, G., & Sowers, N.
- Affiliations
- Dalhousie University (CA)
- Corresponding author
- Kovacs, George
- Venue
- Emergency Medicine Clinics of North America
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2018-02
- Volume
- 36
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 61-84
- ISSN
- 0733-8627 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2767387972
- Cited by
- 115
- References
- 116
- Citations by year
- 2026: 9 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 2
- FWCI
- 1.57
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Emergency Medicine Clinics of North America (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine › Airway Management and Intubation Techniques
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Tracheal and airway disorders
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Emergency Medicine › Trauma and Emergency Care Studies
- Keywords
- airway management, trauma patients, polytrauma, difficult airway, endotracheal intubation, traumatic brain injury, cervical spine injury, maxillofacial trauma, airway injury
- MeSH terms
- Airway Obstruction, Craniocerebral Trauma, Humans, Intubation, Intratracheal, Wounds and Injuries, Airway Management
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-11-02, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).
A second model labelled each claim on 2026-11-02 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).
Cited sources are checked with a language model’s help (gpt-6-sol).
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review