Cited by 114Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic ControlVagus Nerve Stimulation ResearchCardiac Health and Mental Health

From psychological moments to mortality: a multidisciplinary synthesis on heart rate variability spanning the continuum of time

Kemp, Andrew H., Koenig, Julian, Thayer, Julian F.·2017·Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews

Abstract

Heart rate variability (HRV) indexes functioning of the vagus nerve, arguably the most important nerve in the human body. The Neurovisceral Integration Model has provided a structural framework for understanding brain-body integration, highlighting the role of the vagus in adaptation to the environment. In the present paper, we emphasise a temporal framework in which HRV may be considered a missing, structural link between psychological moments and mortality, a proposal we label as Neurovisceral Integration Across a Continuum of Time (or NIACT). This new framework places neurovisceral integration on a dimension of time, highlighting implications for lifespan development and healthy aging, and helping to bridge the gap between clearly demarcated disciplines such as psychology and epidemiology. The NIACT provides a novel framework, which conceptualizes how everyday psychological moments both affect and are affected by the vagus in ways that have long-term effects on mortality risk. We further emphasize that a longitudinal approach to understanding change in vagal function over time may yield novel scientific insights and important public health outcomes.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2017.09.006

Cites

220 of 220 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

5 of the 225 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kemp, A. H., Koenig, J., & Thayer, J. F.
Affiliations
  • The University of Sydney (AU)
  • Heidelberg University (DE)
  • The Ohio State University (US)
Corresponding author
  • Kemp, Andrew H.
  • Thayer, Julian F.
Venue
Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2017-12
Volume
83
Pages
547-567
ISSN
0149-7634 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2752326235
Cited by
114
References
225
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 19 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 13
FWCI
1.90
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • FAPESP (#2013/50327-6)
  • Brazilian research funding institution
  • Medical School of Heidelberg University
  • Post-Doctoral Fellowship provided by the Daimler and Benz Foundation
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Vagus Nerve Stimulation Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac Health and Mental Health
Keywords
heart rate variability, vagus nerve, neurovisceral integration, mortality risk, lifespan development, healthy aging, temporal framework
MeSH terms
Aging, Animals, Heart Rate, Humans, Psychophysiology, Vagus Nerve, Health Behavior, Visceral Afferents

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review