Cited by 616Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on BehaviorSubstance Abuse Treatment and OutcomesNeural and Behavioral Psychology Studies

The addicted human brain viewed in the light of imaging studies: brain circuits and treatment strategies

Volkow, Nora D., Fowler, Joanna S., Wang, Gene-Jack·2004·Neuropharmacology

Abstract

Imaging studies have provided evidence of how the human brain changes as an individual becomes addicted. Here, we integrate the findings from imaging studies to propose a model of drug addiction. The process of addiction is initiated in part by the fast and high increases in DA induced by drugs of abuse. We hypothesize that this supraphysiological effect of drugs trigger a series of adaptations in neuronal circuits involved in saliency/reward, motivation/drive, memory/conditioning, and control/disinhibition, resulting in an enhanced (and long lasting) saliency value for the drug and its associated cues at the expense of decreased sensitivity for salient events of everyday life (including natural reinforcers). Although acute drug intake increases DA neurotransmission, chronic drug consumption results in a marked decrease in DA activity, associated with, among others, dysregulation of the orbitofrontal cortex (region involved with salience attribution) and cingulate gyrus (region involved with inhibitory control). The ensuing increase in motivational drive for the drug, strengthened by conditioned responses and the decrease in inhibitory control favors emergence of compulsive drug taking. This view of how drugs of abuse affect the brain suggests strategies for intervention, which might include: (a) those that will decrease the reward value of the drug of choice; (b) interventions to increase the saliency value of non-drug reinforcers; (c) approaches to weaken conditioned drug behaviors; and (d) methods to strengthen frontal inhibitory and executive control. Though this model focuses mostly on findings from PET studies of the brain DA system it is evident that other neurotransmitters are involved and that a better understanding of their roles in addiction would expand the options for therapeutic targets.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.neuropharm.2004.07.019

Cites

10 of 10 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Volkow, N. D., Fowler, J. S., & Wang, G.-J.
Affiliations
  • National Institute on Drug Abuse (US)
  • Brookhaven National Laboratory (US)
Corresponding author
Volkow, Nora D.
Venue
Neuropharmacology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2004-01
Volume
47
Pages
3-13
ISSN
0028-3908 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2098288561
Cited by
616
References
10
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 36 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 23 · 2017: 26 · 2016: 22 · 2015: 32 · 2014: 42 · 2013: 46 · 2012: 46
FWCI
2.40
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Neuropharmacology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
Keywords
drug addiction, dopamine, brain circuits, salience attribution, reward, motivation, inhibitory control, orbitofrontal cortex, cingulate gyrus, compulsive drug taking, addiction treatment, executive function
MeSH terms
Brain, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Receptors, Drug, Illicit Drugs, Substance-Related Disorders

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review