Cited by 5,902Neural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesVisual Attention and Saliency DetectionVisual perception and processing mechanisms

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 52 of the 52 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Controlled and automatic human information processing: I. Detection, search, and attention.

Schneider, Walter, Shiffrin, Richard M.·1977·Psychological Review

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/0033-295x.84.1.1

Cites

52 of 52 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 52 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Schneider, W., & Shiffrin, R. M.
Affiliations
University of California, Berkeley (US)
Venue
Psychological Review
Published
1977-01
Volume
84
Issue
1
Pages
1-66
ISSN
  • 0033-295X (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-1471
OpenAlex
W2013068849
Cited by
5,902
References
52
Citations by year
2026: 98 · 2025: 99 · 2024: 108 · 2023: 120 · 2022: 134 · 2021: 139 · 2020: 196 · 2019: 200 · 2018: 151 · 2017: 180 · 2016: 164 · 2015: 207 · 2014: 181 · 2013: 170 · 2012: 173
FWCI
39.31
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Psychological Review (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Visual Attention and Saliency Detection
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Visual perception and processing mechanisms
Keywords
information processing, detection, search, attention, controlled processing, automatic processing, selective attention

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review