Cited by 595Memory and Neural MechanismsNeurotransmitter Receptor Influence on BehaviorMotor Control and Adaptation

Activity of striatal neurons reflects dynamic encoding and recoding of procedural memories

Barnes, Terra D., Kubota, Yasuo, Hu, Dan, Jin, Dezhe Z., Graybiel, Ann M.·2005·Nature

Abstract

Learning to perform a behavioural procedure as a well-ingrained habit requires extensive repetition of the behavioural sequence, and learning not to perform such behaviours is notoriously difficult. Yet regaining a habit can occur quickly, with even one or a few exposures to cues previously triggering the behaviour. To identify neural mechanisms that might underlie such learning dynamics, we made long-term recordings from multiple neurons in the sensorimotor striatum, a basal ganglia structure implicated in habit formation, in rats successively trained on a reward-based procedural task, given extinction training and then given reacquisition training. The spike activity of striatal output neurons, nodal points in cortico-basal ganglia circuits, changed markedly across multiple dimensions during each of these phases of learning. First, new patterns of task-related ensemble firing successively formed, reversed and then re-emerged. Second, task-irrelevant firing was suppressed, then rebounded, and then was suppressed again. These changing spike activity patterns were highly correlated with changes in behavioural performance. We propose that these changes in task representation in cortico-basal ganglia circuits represent neural equivalents of the explore-exploit behaviour characteristic of habit learning.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/nature04053

Cites

35 of 35 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • There is a modulation in the firing rate of putamen neurons during the acquisition, extinction, and re-emergence of procedural learning.

    “and there is a modulation in the firing rate of its neurons during the acquisition, extinction, and re-emergence of procedural learning (Barnes et al., 2005).”

    From Neural Correlates of Long-Term Memory Enhancement Following Retrieval Practice (2021) · cites this paper as Barnes et al., 2005

  • Other studies reported a decrease in the number of sensorimotor striatal neurons showing task-relevant phasic activations over the course of training.

    “Other studies also reported a decrease in the number of sensorimotor striatal neurons showing task-relevant phasic activations over the course of training, but in addition, reported that a small group of neurons within the sensorimotor striatum continued to show task-related activations and that the magnitude of the phasic neuronal responses in this restricted population of neurons increased over”
  • In tasks with a single motor response, extended training leads to a decrease in the number of neurons within the sensorimotor striatum showing task-related activation.

    “These studies have reported that extended training leads to a decrease in the number of neurons within the sensorimotor striatum showing task-related activation.”
  • The response of the sensorimotor striatum to extended training depends on the type of task used.

    “On the other hand, there is evidence that the response of the sensorimotor striatum to extended training may depend on the type of task that is used.”
  • The magnitude of phasic neuronal responses in this restricted population of sensorimotor striatal neurons increased over the course of extended training.

    “Other studies also reported a decrease in the number of sensorimotor striatal neurons showing task-relevant phasic activations over the course of training, but in addition, reported that a small group of neurons within the sensorimotor striatum continued to show task-related activations and that the magnitude of the phasic neuronal responses in this restricted population of neurons increased over”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Barnes, T. D., Kubota, Y., Hu, D., Jin, D. Z., & Graybiel, A. M.
Affiliations
  • McGovern Institute for Brain Research (US)
  • Pennsylvania State University (US)
Corresponding author
Graybiel, Ann M.
Venue
Nature
Published
2005-10
Volume
437
Issue
7062
Pages
1158-1161
ISSN
  • 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-4687
OpenAlex
W1979441832
Cited by
595
References
35
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 25 · 2023: 22 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 30 · 2020: 29 · 2019: 24 · 2018: 37 · 2017: 35 · 2016: 33 · 2015: 33 · 2014: 33 · 2013: 32 · 2012: 38
FWCI
14.66
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Nature (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (5p50ns038372-10)
  • National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (P50-NS-038372)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Motor Control and Adaptation
Keywords
habit formation, procedural memory, basal ganglia, sensorimotor striatum, memory reconsolidation, cortico-basal ganglia circuits, reward learning
MeSH terms
Acoustic Stimulation, Action Potentials, Animals, Basal Ganglia, Behavior, Animal, Cues, Extinction, Psychological, Habits, Memory, Neuronal Plasticity, Neurons, Reward, Maze Learning, Rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review