The DOI matches its Crossref record; 130 of the 130 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; 97 of the 109 sources its claims cite were checked for support.
Genetic analysis of the human microglial transcriptome across brain regions, aging and disease pathologies
Open accessPublished version of a preprint
Abstract
Microglia have emerged as important players in brain aging and pathology. To understand how genetic risk for neurological and psychiatric disorders is related to microglial function, large transcriptome studies are essential. Here we describe the transcriptome analysis of 255 primary human microglial samples isolated at autopsy from multiple brain regions of 100 individuals. We performed systematic analyses to investigate various aspects of microglial heterogeneities, including brain region and aging. We mapped expression and splicing quantitative trait loci and showed that many neurological disease susceptibility loci are mediated through gene expression or splicing in microglia. Fine-mapping of these loci nominated candidate causal variants that are within microglia-specific enhancers, finding associations with microglial expression of USP6NL for Alzheimer's disease and P2RY12 for Parkinson's disease. We have built the most comprehensive catalog to date of genetic effects on the microglial transcriptome and propose candidate functional variants in neurological and psychiatric disorders.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
73 Own result · 18 Supported · 18 Partly supported · 17 Own method · 17 Own interpretation · 11 Couldn’t confirm · 3 No full text of the sources · 2 No basis given · 1 Supported so far · accuracy not yet measured
Every source the paper cites for this claim was checked and supports it.
In the paper
“Cluster 2 genes were significantly enriched for genes upregulated following in vitro culture34 and in AD-derived microglia33.”
§ Genetic analysis of the human microglia transcriptome across brain regions, aging and disease pathologies > Results > Biological factors driving the microglia transcriptome
What the sources say
- Supportedcites [34] Gosselin, D. et al. An environment-dependent transcriptional network specifies human microglia identity. Science 356, eaal3222 (2017). source
The cited paper’s “Alterations of the human microglia transcriptome in vitro” section reports 2,263 genes upregulated after transfer to culture, supporting its use as the source for that gene set. The Cluster 2 enrichment is the citing authors’ analysis; the AD-derived microglia comparison is attached to a different citation. (LLM, conf=0.90)
- Supportedcites [33] Srinivasan, K. et al. Alzheimer’s patient microglia exhibit enhanced aging and unique transcriptional activation. Cell Rep. 31, 107843 (2020). source
The Results section, “HAM, DAM, and Aging Comparisons in Human AD, Xenograft AD, and Human MS Tissues” (page not provided), reports increased expression of the HAM-Up gene set in microglia from tissues with high AD pathology. Citation 33 supports the AD-microglia gene set used in the citing authors’ enrichment analysis; the in vitro culture gene set is attributed to citation 34. (LLM, conf=0.90)
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Supported
Every source the paper cites for this claim was checked and supports it.
In the paper
“Using a linear mixed model to estimate the variance explained for a set of factors per gene30, we found that donor identity explained the most variance per gene (mean 13.5%) (Fig. 2a).”
§ Genetic analysis of the human microglia transcriptome across brain regions, aging and disease pathologies > Results > Biological factors driving the microglia transcriptome
What the sources say
- Supportedcites [30] Hoffman, G. E. & Schadt, E. E. variancePartition: interpreting drivers of variation in complex gene expression studies. BMC Bioinformatics 17, 483 (2016). source
The citation is attached to the linear mixed-model method, not to the citing authors’ finding that donor identity explained a mean of 13.5%. The cited paper’s Implementation section (Linear mixed model framework) says it analyzes each gene separately with a linear mixed model and calculates the fraction of variance explained by each effect. (LLM, conf=0.93)
plaincorrelationaln = 115- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Supported
Every source the paper cites for this claim was checked and supports it.
In the paper
“We compared our findings in a published dataset of white and grey matter microglia5 and found small, but significant overlaps with our MFG vs SVZ comparison (upregulated OR = 18.4; P < 1 × 10−16, downregulated OR = 4.83; P = 9 × 10−6; Fisher’s exact test; Fig. 2c).”
§ Genetic analysis of the human microglia transcriptome across brain regions, aging and disease pathologies > Results > Biological factors driving the microglia transcriptome
What the sources say
- Supportedcites [5] van der Poel, M. et al. Transcriptional profiling of human microglia reveals grey–white matter heterogeneity and multiple sclerosis-associated changes. Nat. Commun. 10, 1139 (2019). source
The Results section (“A common core signature for GM and WM microglia”) states that the paper isolated and profiled human microglia from grey-matter occipital cortex and white-matter corpus callosum. This supports the citation’s identification of a published grey- and white-matter microglia dataset. The overlap statistics are results of the citing authors’ comparison, not findings attributed to this source. (LLM, conf=0.93)
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Supported
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“However, recent evidence from genome-wide association studies (GWAS) and other follow-up analyses has suggested that a proportion of the genetic risk of neurological and psychiatric diseases acts through myeloid cells22–25.”
§ Genetic analysis of the human microglia transcriptome across brain regions, aging and disease pathologies > Introduction
What the sources say
- Partly supportedcites [22] Raj, T. et al. Polarization of the effects of autoimmune and neurodegenerative risk alleles in leukocytes. Science 344, 519–523 (2014). sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Abstract reports that Alzheimer’s and Parkinson’s disease risk variants are enriched for monocyte-specific effects and suggests a role for the myeloid compartment in neurodegenerative susceptibility. It does not establish the same point for psychiatric diseases or neurological diseases generally; it also cautions that blood-derived monocytes may be proxies for other myeloid cells. (LLM, conf=0.88)
- Partly supportedcites [23] Kunkle, B. W. et al. Genetic meta-analysis of diagnosed Alzheimer’s disease identifies new risk loci and implicates Aβ, tau, immunity and lipid processing. Nat. Genet. 51, 414–430 (2019). sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Results (Candidate gene prioritization at genome-wide loci; page unavailable) link Alzheimer’s disease risk genes to microglial expression, and the Methods (Regulatory variant and eQTL analysis; page unavailable) identify myeloid cells as relevant to Alzheimer’s disease and neurodegeneration. These passages support the suggestion for Alzheimer’s disease, but do not establish it for psychiatric diseases or neurological diseases broadly. (LLM, conf=0.86)
- Partly supportedcites [24] McCauley, M. E. & Baloh, R. H. Inflammation in ALS/FTD pathogenesis. Acta Neuropathol. 137, 715–730 (2019). sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Introduction section on ALS/FTD-associated genes says mutations in these genes could directly influence immune-cell function, and the Conclusion identifies myeloid cells as a possible route by which genetic variants contribute to ALS/FTD pathogenesis. Our copy does not establish the broader claim about neurological and psychiatric diseases or attribute that claim to GWAS and follow-up analyses. No page numbers were provided for these passages. (LLM, conf=0.85)
- Partly supportedcites [25] Gandal, M. J. et al. Transcriptome-wide isoform-level dysregulation in ASD, schizophrenia, and bipolar disorder. Science 362, eaat8127 (2018). sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The ‘Distinct Trajectories of Neural-Immune Dysregulation’ section says complement-mediated synaptic pruning may contribute to schizophrenia pathophysiology, presumably through microglia. The paper also analyzes psychiatric GWAS enrichment, but the passages do not establish what proportion of genetic risk acts through myeloid cells or extend that finding to neurological diseases. (LLM, conf=0.74)
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Partly supported
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“In addition, we found age-related changes in genes involved in a wide range of inflammatory responses, in line with previous results in aging in microglia16,26,62 and peripheral blood39.”
§ Genetic analysis of the human microglia transcriptome across brain regions, aging and disease pathologies > Discussion
What the sources say
- Supportedcites [16] Galatro, T. F. et al. Transcriptomic analysis of purified human cortical microglia reveals age-associated changes. Nat. Neurosci. 20, 1162–1171 (2017). source
The age-associated gene-expression section (p. 9) reports changes in human microglial genes, including immune-related receptors, and identifies ‘immune response’ among the enriched categories. This supports citing the paper as a previous finding of age-related changes in genes involved in inflammatory responses. (LLM, conf=0.87)
- Supportedcites [26] Young, A. M. H. et al. A map of transcriptional heterogeneity and regulatory variation in human microglia. Nat. Genet. 53, 861–868 (2021). source
The Biological determinants of microglial expression section reports 260 genes whose expression varied with age, including upregulation of inflammation-related genes. The Discussion characterizes the age effects on individual genes as relatively subtle but consistent with increased inflammatory senescence, supporting the citing sentence’s comparison with earlier microglial findings. (LLM, conf=0.88)
- Partly supportedcites [62] Stevens, B. et al. The classical complement cascade mediates CNS synapse elimination. Cell 131, 1164–1178 (2007). sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Results (page unavailable) report that C1q mRNA in retinal ganglion cells is highest during postnatal development and declines by P30. This supports an age-related change in a complement gene, but not a wide range of inflammatory-response genes or findings about normal aging in microglia. (LLM, conf=0.78)
- Supportedcites [39] Peters, M. J. et al. The transcriptional landscape of age in human peripheral blood. Nat. Commun. 6, 8570 (2015). source
The Results section (“Novel and known age-associated genes and pathways”; page not available) identifies age-correlated gene clusters involved in innate and adaptive immunity, including T- and B-cell signalling. The Discussion also reports age-related changes in immune-associated genes across multiple blood cell types. These findings support the cited comparison to age-related changes in genes involved in inflammatory responses in peripheral blood. (LLM, conf=0.85)
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Supported
The cited sources that could be checked couldn’t confirm or dispute this claim.
In the paper
“The MED12L locus was identified in the latest PD GWAS50.”
§ Genetic analysis of the human microglia transcriptome across brain regions, aging and disease pathologies > Results > Neurological disease loci regulate microglia gene expression
What the sources say
- Could not verifycites [50] Nalls, M. A. et al. Identification of novel risk loci, causal insights, and heritable risk for Parkinson’s disease: a meta-analysis of genome-wide association studies. Lancet Neurol. 18, 1091–1102 (2019). sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Results report 90 Parkinson’s disease GWAS signals, including 38 new signals, but do not identify a MED12L locus. Searches of our copy for “MED12L” and a paraphrase of the locus claim found no passage establishing that this study identified it. (LLM, conf=0.72)
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Could not verify
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“The comparison of m-values between microglia (MiGA) and monocytes (MyND42, and Fairfax41) showed that a large number of eQTLs in AD loci have shared effects between these two cell types, for example, MS4A6A, RABEP1, CD33, FCER1G, and ABCA7.”
§ Genetic analysis of the human microglia transcriptome across brain regions, aging and disease pathologies > Results > Genetic regulatory effects in microglia
What the sources say
- Partly supportedcites [23] Kunkle, B. W. et al. Genetic meta-analysis of diagnosed Alzheimer’s disease identifies new risk loci and implicates Aβ, tau, immunity and lipid processing. Nat. Genet. 51, 414–430 (2019). sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Results section (‘Candidate gene prioritization at genome-wide loci’; page unavailable) reports eQTL analyses in Alzheimer’s disease–relevant tissues and implicates ABCA7 and MS4A6A. It does not report an m-value comparison between microglia and monocytes or establish shared eQTL effects across those cell types for the five listed genes. (LLM, conf=0.85)
- Could not verifycites [46] Marioni, R. E. et al. GWAS on family history of Alzheimer’s disease. Transl. Psychiatry 8, 99 (2018). sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Results section on summary data-based Mendelian randomisation reports eQTL analyses using brain tissue, not a comparison of microglia and monocytes. The Discussion suggests that monocytes may be relevant for future analysis but does not report shared eQTL effects. Searches for the named cell-type datasets and genes found no passage addressing the claimed comparison; page numbers are unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.75)
- Could not verifycites [42] Navarro, E. et al. Dysregulation of mitochondrial and proteolysosomal genes in Parkinson’s disease myeloid cells. Nat. Aging 1, 850–863 (2021). sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Results section, “PD common variants alter gene expression in monocytes” (page unavailable), analyzes Parkinson’s disease loci, while the Methods section, “Quantitative Trait Loci Analysis” (page unavailable), describes MyND monocyte eQTL analysis and replication with Fairfax data. Searches for m-values, shared effects at Alzheimer’s disease loci, and the named genes found no passage establishing the claimed microglia–monocyte comparison. (LLM, conf=0.73)
- Supportedcites [41] Fairfax, B. P. et al. Innate immune activity conditions the effect of regulatory variants upon monocyte gene expression. Science 343, 1246949 (2014). source
Fairfax is cited as a monocyte eQTL dataset used in the citing authors’ comparison, not as the source of the microglia–monocyte comparison itself. The Results (‘Innate Immune Stimuli–Induced Transcriptomes’; page unavailable) describe gene-expression profiling and genotyping of primary human monocytes, supporting that identification. (LLM, conf=0.91)
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Partly supported
Every source the paper cites for this claim was checked and supports it.
In the paper
“Disease-associated eQTLs results were partly shared between MiGA and the microglia eQTL study by Young et al26.”
§ Genetic analysis of the human microglia transcriptome across brain regions, aging and disease pathologies > Discussion
What the sources say
- Supportedcites [26] Young, A. M. H. et al. A map of transcriptional heterogeneity and regulatory variation in human microglia. Nat. Genet. 53, 861–868 (2021). source
The citation identifies Young et al. as the microglia eQTL study used for comparison. The ‘eQTL mapping in human microglia’ section reports microglia eQTLs and their colocalization with disease-risk loci. The statement that some results were shared with MiGA is the citing authors’ comparison, not a finding attributed to Young et al. (LLM, conf=0.88)
plaincorrelationaln = 93- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Supported
The cited sources that could be checked couldn’t confirm or dispute this claim.
In the paper
“The lead QTL SNP rs3732765-A decreases PD risk (β = −0.06; P = 2.4×10−10; 58), and we propose that it acts through downregulating P2RY12 expression in microglia.”
§ Genetic analysis of the human microglia transcriptome across brain regions, aging and disease pathologies > Results > Neurological disease loci regulate microglia gene expression
What the sources say
- Could not verifycites [58] Hollingworth, P. et al. Common variants at ABCA7, MS4A6A/MS4A4E, EPHA1, CD33 and CD2AP are associated with Alzheimer’s disease. Nat. Genet. 43, 429–435 (2011). sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The paper’s association results (Abstract; page unavailable) concern Alzheimer’s disease and report SNPs at ABCA7 and the MS4A gene cluster. Searches for rs3732765, P2RY12, microglia, and Parkinson’s disease found no passage addressing the cited PD-risk result. The proposed expression mechanism is the citing authors’ own proposal, not a finding established by this source. (LLM, conf=0.78)
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Could not verify
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“The number of genes that overlapped between the datasets was small, but significant (upregulated genes OR = 23.4; P < 1 × 10−16, downregulated genes OR = 5.97; P < 1 × 10−16; Fisher’s Exact test; Fig. 3e).”
§ Genetic analysis of the human microglia transcriptome across brain regions, aging and disease pathologies > Results > Biological factors driving the microglia transcriptome
What the sources say
- Partly supportedcites [16] Galatro, T. F. et al. Transcriptomic analysis of purified human cortical microglia reveals age-associated changes. Nat. Neurosci. 20, 1162–1171 (2017). sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The paper profiles aging-related gene expression in human microglia from the parietal cortex (p. 2) and reports a small, significant overlap with an aging mouse microglia dataset (Age-associated changes in microglial gene expression, p. 9). It does not report the claimed overlap with the citing authors’ dataset or the stated odds ratios and P values, and its aging analysis does not include peripheral blood. (LLM, conf=0.84)
- Supportedcites [39] Peters, M. J. et al. The transcriptional landscape of age in human peripheral blood. Nat. Commun. 6, 8570 (2015). source
The Results section (‘1,497 genes differentially expressed with chronological age’; page unavailable) identifies the cited work as a peripheral-blood aging gene dataset, with 600 genes positively and 897 negatively associated with age. The overlap, odds ratios and P-values in Fig. 3e are the citing authors’ own comparison, not findings attributed to this source. (LLM, conf=0.87)
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Partly supported
- Probably not a substantial claim. 36
- It may state two separate claims as one. 60
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“In addition, microglial functions vary across different ages, disease pathologies, and between sexes10–16.”
§ Genetic analysis of the human microglia transcriptome across brain regions, aging and disease pathologies > Introduction
What the sources say
- Partly supportedcites [10] Olah, M. et al. A transcriptomic atlas of aged human microglia. Nat. Commun. 9, 539 (2018). sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Results section ('Identification of human microglia genes affected by aging'; page unavailable) reports age-associated changes in microglial transcriptional programs and their inferred functions. The Methods ('Identification of microglia enriched genes'; page unavailable) suggests that variation may reflect responses to differing amyloid and tau pathology, but does not establish functional differences across disease pathologies. The passages found do not show that microglial functions differ between sexes. (LLM, conf=0.84)
- Partly supportedcites [11] Mathys, H. et al. Single-cell transcriptomic analysis of Alzheimer’s disease. Nature 570, 332–337 (2019). sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
In “Identification of AD-associated cellular subpopulations” (page unavailable), the paper reports an AD-associated microglial state with markers distinct from those of non-AD aged microglia. “Sex-specific differential response to AD pathology” (page unavailable) reports that this microglial subpopulation was enriched with cells from female individuals. These findings support variation in microglial transcriptional states with AD pathology and sex, but the paper does not establish variation in microglial functions across different ages or directly measure the claimed functional differences. (LLM, conf=0.84)
- Partly supportedcites [12] Mrdjen, D. et al. High-dimensional single-cell mapping of central nervous system immune cells reveals distinct myeloid subsets in health, aging, and disease. Immunity 48, 599 (2018). sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The ‘Aging and Neurodegenerative Disease Change the CNS Immune Cell Landscape’ section and Figure 5 (p. 389) report age- and Alzheimer’s-associated microglial changes; the Discussion also distinguishes the microglial phenotype in EAE from those in aging and Alzheimer’s disease. These passages support variation across ages and disease conditions, but our copy does not establish variation between sexes. The paper primarily measures phenotypic markers rather than directly comparing microglial functions. (LLM, conf=0.86)
- Supportedcites [13] Hammond, T. R. et al. Single-cell RNA sequencing of microglia throughout the mouse lifespan and in the injured brain reveals complex cell-state changes. Immunity 50, 253–271.e6 (2019). source
The Introduction describes different microglial roles during development and responses to injury, pathology, and aging. The Results report age- and injury-related changes in microglial states and cite evidence of sex differences in microglial function. This paper found little difference in microglial diversity between sexes, but that does not contradict the broader claim about function. (LLM, conf=0.85)
- Partly supportedcites [14] Keren-Shaul, H. et al. A unique microglia type associated with restricting development of Alzheimer’s disease. Cell 169, 1276–1290.e17 (2017). sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Results report distinct microglial states in Alzheimer’s disease and ALS models, and a larger disease-associated microglia population in aged than young mice. Those findings support variation with age and disease, but the paper does not establish that microglial functions differ between sexes; its mention of male and female mice is not a sex comparison. The cited passages have section labels but no page numbers in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.88)
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [15] Masuda, T. et al. Author correction: spatial and temporal heterogeneity of mouse and human microglia at single-cell resolution. Nature 568, E4 (2019). source
- Partly supportedcites [16] Galatro, T. F. et al. Transcriptomic analysis of purified human cortical microglia reveals age-associated changes. Nat. Neurosci. 20, 1162–1171 (2017). sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The age-associated changes section (p. 9) reports changes in microglial gene expression across donor ages, including genes linked to immune response and motility. The Discussion (p. 10) reports sex differences in microglial function in the developing brain, but finds only X- and Y-chromosome gene-expression differences in its human samples. It does not establish that microglial functions vary across disease pathologies; donors with overt CNS pathologies were excluded (Discussion, p. 9). (LLM, conf=0.85)
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
- Partly supported
Every source the paper cites for this claim was checked and supports it.
In the paper
“In addition, it is becoming increasingly clear that genetic risk can also be mediated through mRNA splicing28,29.”
§ Genetic analysis of the human microglia transcriptome across brain regions, aging and disease pathologies > Introduction
What the sources say
- Supportedcites [28] Li, Y. I. et al. RNA splicing is a primary link between genetic variation and disease. Science 352, 600–604 (2016). source
The Abstract (page not provided) reports that splicing QTLs are major contributors to complex traits. The paper’s conclusion also identifies RNA splicing as a pathway through which genetic variation has phenotypic and pathogenic consequences, supporting the claim that genetic risk can be mediated through splicing. (LLM, conf=0.93)
- Supportedcites [29] Raj, T. et al. CD33: increased inclusion of exon 2 implicates the Ig V-set domain in Alzheimer’s disease susceptibility. Hum. Mol. Genet. 23, 2729–2736 (2014). source
The Results link the Alzheimer’s disease risk allele to increased CD33 exon 2 inclusion and suggest that altered splicing may be the locus’s primary effect on susceptibility. The Discussion likewise identifies altered CD33 splicing as a possible mechanism connecting the genetic variant to disease risk. Page numbers are not provided in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.91)
plainconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
- Supported
Every source the paper cites for this claim was checked and supports it.
In the paper
“For instance, the CD33 locus in AD influences CD33 splicing, resulting in isoforms with different biological and likely pathological functions29.”
§ Genetic analysis of the human microglia transcriptome across brain regions, aging and disease pathologies > Introduction
What the sources say
- Supportedcites [29] Raj, T. et al. CD33: increased inclusion of exon 2 implicates the Ig V-set domain in Alzheimer’s disease susceptibility. Hum. Mol. Genet. 23, 2729–2736 (2014). source
The Discussion reports that AD-associated CD33 variants alter exon 2 splicing and increase the full-length CD33M isoform. It also states that CD33M inhibits amyloid-beta uptake whereas the truncated CD33m isoform does not, linking the splicing difference to a possible mechanism of AD susceptibility. (LLM, conf=0.93)
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
- Supported
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“Microglia are highly dynamic cells that are strongly influenced by different environmental signals which result in distinct phenotypes and functions across brain regions4–9.”
§ Genetic analysis of the human microglia transcriptome across brain regions, aging and disease pathologies > Introduction
What the sources say
- Partly supportedcites [4] Tan, Y.-L., Yuan, Y. & Tian, L. Microglial regional heterogeneity and its role in the brain. Mol. Psychiatry 25, 351–367 (2020). sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
In “What may contribute to regional heterogeneity of microglia: nature versus nurture?” (page unavailable), the review describes microglia as highly sensitive to environmental changes and says local cues shape region-specific phenotypes. It treats the environment as a likely contributor, however, and allows for intrinsic mechanisms. In “Heterogeneity in microglial functions across CNS regions” (page unavailable), it reports regional functional differences but says direct evidence linking region-specific features to functions remains insufficient; the claim presents that environmental cause more definitively than the source does. (LLM, conf=0.85)
- Supportedcites [5] van der Poel, M. et al. Transcriptional profiling of human microglia reveals grey–white matter heterogeneity and multiple sclerosis-associated changes. Nat. Commun. 10, 1139 (2019). source
The Introduction says microglia respond quickly to environmental changes, which can alter their states and functions. The Discussion reports distinct transcriptomic profiles in grey- and white-matter microglia and emphasizes regional differences in their responses to stimuli. Together, these passages support the paraphrase. (LLM, conf=0.91)
- Partly supportedcites [6] Grabert, K. et al. Microglial brain region-dependent diversity and selective regional sensitivities to aging. Nat. Neurosci. 19, 504–516 (2016). sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Introduction describes the local environment as a key influence on microglial phenotype, and the Results report regional differences in immune alertness and energy-metabolism gene expression. The Discussion, however, says local environmental differences *may* be important; it does not establish that environmental signals cause the regional differences or directly demonstrate distinct functions across regions. (LLM, conf=0.84)
- Supportedcites [7] De Biase, L. M. et al. Local cues establish and maintain region-specific phenotypes of basal ganglia microglia. Neuron 95, 341–356.e6 (2017). source
The Introduction describes rapid changes in microglial morphology and activity in response to CNS insults. The Discussion (‘Maintenance of diverse microglial phenotypes’; page unavailable) reports that distinct phenotypes across basal ganglia nuclei reemerge after ablation and repopulation, indicating an ongoing role for local cues. This supports the claim, with the paper’s direct regional evidence coming from basal ganglia nuclei. (LLM, conf=0.91)
- Partly supportedcites [8] Soreq, L. et al. Major shifts in glial regional identity are a transcriptional hallmark of human brain aging. Cell Rep. 18, 557–570 (2017). sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Results section reports substantial age-related changes in microglia-specific gene expression and a distinct profile in the cerebellum. It also says that most regions were not strongly separated by those genes and that expression was more defined by age than by region. The paper does not establish that different environmental signals cause distinct microglial phenotypes and functions across brain regions. (LLM, conf=0.85)
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [9] Masuda, T. et al. Spatial and temporal heterogeneity of mouse and human microglia at single-cell resolution. Nature 566, 388–392 (2019). source
boosteddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Partly supported
Every source the paper cites for this claim was checked and supports it.
In the paper
“Cluster 1 contained genes that were upregulated in the cortical regions compared to subcortical regions, such as P2RY12, CD36, and MRC1, and was enriched in genes that were downregulated in AD brain33 and in response to in vitro culture34.”
§ Genetic analysis of the human microglia transcriptome across brain regions, aging and disease pathologies > Results > Biological factors driving the microglia transcriptome
What the sources say
- Supportedcites [33] Srinivasan, K. et al. Alzheimer’s patient microglia exhibit enhanced aging and unique transcriptional activation. Cell Rep. 31, 107843 (2020). source
Citation 33 is attached to the description of genes downregulated in AD brain, not to the citing paper’s Cluster 1 analysis or the in vitro culture claim attributed to citation 34. In Results, “Defining the HAM Gene Expression Profile Using Frozen Tissues” reports 21 genes decreased in AD microglia; “Validation of the HAM Profile in Multiple Cortical Regions and Datasets” also reports decreased expression of the HAM-Down gene set in later-stage AD brain tissue. (LLM, conf=0.91)
- Supportedcites [34] Gosselin, D. et al. An environment-dependent transcriptional network specifies human microglia identity. Science 356, eaal3222 (2017). source
Citation 34 is attached to the claim about downregulation in response to in vitro culture, not the cortical–subcortical comparison or the AD-brain finding. In “An environment-dependent transcriptional network,” the paper reports that 117 of 291 disorder-associated microglial transcripts were downregulated in vitro; the “Alterations of the human microglia transcriptome in vitro” section also reports reductions among AD-risk-associated genes. (LLM, conf=0.90)
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Supported
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“For decades, changes in microglial density, morphology, and transcriptional state have been observed in postmortem brain tissue of patients with neurological and psychiatric disorders17–21.”
§ Genetic analysis of the human microglia transcriptome across brain regions, aging and disease pathologies > Introduction
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [17] McGeer, P. L. et al. Microglia in degenerative neurological disease. Glia 7, 84–92 (1993). source
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [18] Kreutzberg, G. W. Microglia: a sensor for pathological events in the CNS. Trends Neurosci. 19, 312–318 (1996). source
- Partly supportedcites [19] Trépanier, M. O., Hopperton, K. E., Mizrahi, R., Mechawar, N. & Bazinet, R. P. Postmortem evidence of cerebral inflammation in schizophrenia: a systematic review. Mol. Psychiatry 21, 1009–1026 (2016). sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Microglia section (page not provided) reports changes in microglial labeling and morphology in postmortem schizophrenia brains, and discusses differences in microglial-marker mRNA expression. But this review focuses on schizophrenia, not neurological and psychiatric disorders generally, and it reports many studies with no change. The broader scope of the citing sentence is therefore not supported by this source alone. (LLM, conf=0.86)
- Partly supportedcites [20] Hopperton, K. E., Mohammad, D., Trépanier, M. O., Giuliano, V. & Bazinet, R. P. Markers of microglia in post-mortem brain samples from patients with Alzheimer’s disease: a systematic review. Mol. Psychiatry 23, 177–198 (2018). sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Abstract reports altered activation-associated microglial markers in postmortem Alzheimer’s disease tissue, and the Results (High-throughput techniques: microarray and proteomics) report changes in microglia-associated gene-expression patterns. The Results (Microglia identified by morphology) report mixed findings on cell counts; they use morphology to identify cells, rather than establish a consistent morphological change. The review focuses on Alzheimer’s disease and does not substantiate the full claim across neurological and psychiatric disorders. (LLM, conf=0.85)
- Partly supportedcites [21] Parikshak, N. N. et al. Genome-wide changes in lncRNA, splicing, and regional gene expression patterns in autism. Nature 540, 423–427 (2016). sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The paper’s transcriptome analysis of postmortem ASD cortex reports increased expression of genes enriched in microglia (Abstract; page not provided), supporting the transcriptional-change part of the claim. Our copy does not report changes in microglial density or morphology, or establish the claim across neurological and psychiatric disorders over decades. (LLM, conf=0.87)
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“Cluster 1 genes were enriched in genes that were downregulated in AD brain and in response to in vitro culture.”
§ Genetic analysis of the human microglia transcriptome across brain regions, aging and disease pathologies > Results > Biological factors driving the microglia transcriptome
What the sources say
- Could not verifycites [33] Srinivasan, K. et al. Alzheimer’s patient microglia exhibit enhanced aging and unique transcriptional activation. Cell Rep. 31, 107843 (2020). sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Results section on the HAM profile reports genes decreased in AD microglia, but does not identify a ‘Cluster 1’ or test its enrichment. Searches for ‘Cluster 1’ and in vitro culture found no passage establishing the claimed relationship; the cited paper’s copy therefore does not verify this specific claim. (LLM, conf=0.72)
- Partly supportedcites [34] Gosselin, D. et al. An environment-dependent transcriptional network specifies human microglia identity. Science 356, eaal3222 (2017). sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The ‘An environment-dependent transcriptional network’ section reports that some microglia transcripts associated with differential expression in AD and other disorders were downregulated in vitro. The ‘Human microglia transcriptomes’ section reports overlap with AD-related gene sets, but the cited passages do not identify a ‘Cluster 1’ or establish that its genes were enriched among genes downregulated in AD brain. (LLM, conf=0.82)
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Could not verify
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“Recently, Young et al. constructed expression QTLs (eQTLs) in primary human microglia (n = 93 individuals/samples), and detected 401 eQTLs, some of which colocalized with AD loci, including BIN126.”
§ Genetic analysis of the human microglia transcriptome across brain regions, aging and disease pathologies > Introduction
What the sources say
- Partly supportedcites [26] Young, A. M. H. et al. A map of transcriptional heterogeneity and regulatory variation in human microglia. Nat. Genet. 53, 861–868 (2021). sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The ‘eQTL mapping in human microglia’ section reports data from 93 individuals, but says the study detected 585 eQTLs at 5% FDR, not 401. The ‘Fine-mapping primary microglia eQTLs using an in-vitro model’ section confirms that some primary-microglia eQTLs colocalized with Alzheimer’s disease risk loci, including BIN1. (LLM, conf=0.92)
plaincorrelationaln = 93- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
- Partly supported
Every source the paper cites for this claim was checked and supports it.
In the paper
“We found that eQTL sharing was both cell type- and region-dependent (Fig. 4d), with the highest sharing between MiGA and the Young et al. microglia (π1 = 0.81–0.86), but with a lower sharing in the SVZ (π1 = 0.51).”
§ Genetic analysis of the human microglia transcriptome across brain regions, aging and disease pathologies > Results > Genetic regulatory effects in microglia
What the sources say
- Supportedcites [26] Young, A. M. H. et al. A map of transcriptional heterogeneity and regulatory variation in human microglia. Nat. Genet. 53, 861–868 (2021). source
The citation identifies the Young et al. microglia dataset used in the citing authors’ comparison. The source’s “eQTL mapping in human microglia” section reports mapping eQTLs in primary human microglia. The π1 sharing estimates are presented as the citing authors’ own findings, not results attributed to Young et al. (LLM, conf=0.90)
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Supported
The cited sources that could be checked couldn’t confirm or dispute this claim.
In the paper
“No colocalization was observed in any other QTL dataset, though we note that USP6NL is expressed five-fold higher in microglia than in monocytes (MiGA median TPM = 15.77; MyND42 monocyte median TPM = 3.13).”
§ Genetic analysis of the human microglia transcriptome across brain regions, aging and disease pathologies > Results > Neurological disease loci regulate microglia gene expression
What the sources say
- Could not verifycites [42] Navarro, E. et al. Dysregulation of mitochondrial and proteolysosomal genes in Parkinson’s disease myeloid cells. Nat. Aging 1, 850–863 (2021). sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Results section reports colocalization at 15 of 78 Parkinson’s disease loci, but does not address whether USP6NL colocalized in other QTL datasets. Searches for USP6NL and the stated MiGA/MyND42 median TPM values found no passage supporting the five-fold microglia–monocyte expression comparison. The retrieved passages have no page numbers. (LLM, conf=0.72)
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Could not verify
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“Together, these results highlight shared genetic regulation between microglia and monocytes, which is only partly captured in whole-tissue brain data22.”
§ Genetic analysis of the human microglia transcriptome across brain regions, aging and disease pathologies > Results > Genetic regulatory effects in microglia
What the sources say
- Partly supportedcites [22] Raj, T. et al. Polarization of the effects of autoimmune and neurodegenerative risk alleles in leukocytes. Science 344, 519–523 (2014). sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The discussion passage (indexed under Abstract; page unavailable) suggests that monocytes may be proxies for resident microglia and says the two share many transcriptome patterns. But the study measured genetic effects in monocytes and T cells, not microglia, and our copy does not establish shared genetic regulation between microglia and monocytes or compare those effects with whole-tissue brain data. (LLM, conf=0.82)
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Partly supported
Every source the paper cites for this claim was checked and supports it.
In the paper
“The meta-analyzed eQTL colocalizes with the ECHDC3 locus in all 4 AD GWAS used in this study, with the highest PP4 (0.95) seen in 46 (Fig. 6c; Extended Data Fig. 3–4).”
§ Genetic analysis of the human microglia transcriptome across brain regions, aging and disease pathologies > Results > Neurological disease loci regulate microglia gene expression
What the sources say
- Supportedcites [46] Marioni, R. E. et al. GWAS on family history of Alzheimer’s disease. Transl. Psychiatry 8, 99 (2018). source
The citation numbered 46 identifies the AD GWAS in which the citing authors observed their highest PP4; it does not attribute their colocalization analysis to this paper. The Results section, “UK Biobank parental and IGAP meta-analysis” (page unavailable), confirms that the source reports an AD GWAS meta-analysis. (LLM, conf=0.85)
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Supported
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“The upregulated genes in chronological aging showed overrepresentation for genes in AD (e.g. MS4A6A, FCER1G, and CR1) or PD (e.g. BST1, PTPN22, and TNFSF13) GWAS loci, but not for genes in schizophrenia (SCZ) or bipolar disorder (BD) (Fig. 3d).”
§ Genetic analysis of the human microglia transcriptome across brain regions, aging and disease pathologies > Results > Biological factors driving the microglia transcriptome
What the sources say
- Partly supportedcites [35] Stahl, E. A. et al. Genome-wide association study identifies 30 loci associated with bipolar disorder. Nat. Genet. 51, 793–803 (2019). sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Results section (‘Follow-up of suggestive loci in additional samples’; page unavailable) identifies 30 bipolar-disorder GWAS loci, supporting use of this paper as a source for BD loci. It does not test whether genes upregulated in chronological aging are overrepresented in AD or PD loci but not SCZ or BD loci; that comparison is not supported by this source. (LLM, conf=0.83)
- Could not verifycites [36] Gusev, A. et al. Transcriptome-wide association study of schizophrenia and chromatin activity yields mechanistic disease insights. Nat. Genet. 50, 538–548 (2018). sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Results section (“TWAS for SCZ identifies new susceptibility genes”; page unavailable) reports schizophrenia-associated genes, but not an enrichment analysis of genes upregulated in chronological aging. Searches for chronological aging, AD/PD enrichment, and the named example genes found no passage addressing the claimed comparison with SCZ or BD. (LLM, conf=0.76)
- Could not verifycites [37] Raj, T. et al. Integrative transcriptome analyses of the aging brain implicate altered splicing in Alzheimer’s disease susceptibility. Nat. Genet. 50, 1584–1592 (2018). sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Results section on TWAS identifies CR1 in a known Alzheimer’s disease locus, but does not say that genes upregulated with chronological aging are overrepresented in AD or PD GWAS loci. Searches for aging-related upregulation and for the PD, schizophrenia, and bipolar comparisons found no passage addressing the claimed enrichment pattern. No page numbers are available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.72)
- Could not verifycites [38] Li, Y. I., Wong, G., Humphrey, J. & Raj, T. Prioritizing Parkinson’s disease genes using population-scale transcriptomic data. Nat. Commun. 10, 994 (2019). sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Results section reports enrichment of PD GWAS signals near genes expressed in particular tissues and among molecular QTLs, not among genes upregulated with chronological aging. Searches for chronological aging, the named genes, and SCZ/BD comparisons found no passage in our copy addressing the claimed four-disorder comparison; page numbers were not available. (LLM, conf=0.73)
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Partly supported
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“The ECHDC3 locus has been associated with AD risk in several GWAS23,46,49.”
§ Genetic analysis of the human microglia transcriptome across brain regions, aging and disease pathologies > Results > Neurological disease loci regulate microglia gene expression
What the sources say
- Supportedcites [23] Kunkle, B. W. et al. Genetic meta-analysis of diagnosed Alzheimer’s disease identifies new risk loci and implicates Aβ, tau, immunity and lipid processing. Nat. Genet. 51, 414–430 (2019). source
The Results section (‘Meta-analysis of Alzheimer’s disease GWAS’) says ECHDC3 was identified as a potential Alzheimer’s disease risk locus in several studies. It also reports a genome-wide-significant association for ECHDC3 in this meta-analysis, supporting the citing sentence’s broader wording. (LLM, conf=0.92)
- Could not verifycites [46] Marioni, R. E. et al. GWAS on family history of Alzheimer’s disease. Transl. Psychiatry 8, 99 (2018). sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Results sections on established and novel AD risk loci list other loci but do not mention ECHDC3. Searches for “ECHDC3” and its association with AD risk found no passage addressing the claimed locus or its appearance in several GWAS; page numbers are not available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.72)
- Supportedcites [49] Jansen, I. E. et al. Genome-wide meta-analysis identifies new loci and functional pathways influencing Alzheimer’s disease risk. Nat. Genet. 51, 404–413 (2019). source
The Results section (“Genome-wide meta-analysis for AD status”; page not specified) identifies ECHDC3 among loci associated in this meta-analysis and says it had been discovered in earlier genetic studies of AD. This supports the claim that the locus has been associated with AD risk in several GWAS. (LLM, conf=0.91)
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Supported
Every source the paper cites for this claim was checked and supports it.
In the paper
“PLAC-seq56 revealed long-range connections between the enhancer and the P2RY12 promoter but not to MED12L (Fig. 6g).”
§ Genetic analysis of the human microglia transcriptome across brain regions, aging and disease pathologies > Results > Neurological disease loci regulate microglia gene expression
What the sources say
- Supportedcites [56] Nott, A. et al. Brain cell type-specific enhancer-promoter interactome maps and disease-risk association. Science 366, 1134–1139 (2019). source
The citation is attached to “PLAC-seq,” identifying the source of the interactome data used in the citing paper’s Fig. 6g. In the supplied passage (section labelled Abstract; page unavailable), Nott et al. report using PLAC-seq to identify long-range enhancer–promoter loops in brain cell types. (LLM, conf=0.88)
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Supported
Every source the paper cites for this claim was checked and supports it.
In the paper
“The downregulated genes were significantly enriched for cell motility, polarity, IL-6 cytokine signaling (Fig. 3b), and for genes also downregulated following in vitro culture34 and in AD-derived microglia33 (Fig. 3c).”
§ Genetic analysis of the human microglia transcriptome across brain regions, aging and disease pathologies > Results > Biological factors driving the microglia transcriptome
What the sources say
- Supportedcites [34] Gosselin, D. et al. An environment-dependent transcriptional network specifies human microglia identity. Science 356, eaal3222 (2017). source
Citation 34 is attached to the in vitro culture comparison, not the cell-motility, polarity, IL-6, or AD-derived microglia findings. In “Alterations of the human microglia transcriptome in vitro,” the source reports thousands of genes downregulated after human microglia were transferred to culture. The citing paper’s enrichment analysis is its own finding. (LLM, conf=0.91)
- Supportedcites [33] Srinivasan, K. et al. Alzheimer’s patient microglia exhibit enhanced aging and unique transcriptional activation. Cell Rep. 31, 107843 (2020). source
Citation 33 is attached to the comparison with genes downregulated in AD-derived microglia, not to the citing authors’ enrichment analysis. In Results, “Defining the HAM Gene Expression Profile Using Frozen Tissues” (page unavailable), the source reports 21 genes decreased in AD microglia relative to controls. (LLM, conf=0.91)
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Supported
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“P2RY12 expression is lost upon microglia activation74, culture34”
§ Genetic analysis of the human microglia transcriptome across brain regions, aging and disease pathologies > Discussion
What the sources say
- Supportedcites [74] Haynes, S. E. et al. The P2Y12 receptor regulates microglial activation by extracellular nucleotides. Nat. Neurosci. 9, 1512–1519 (2006). source
The source supports the activation portion of the sentence: the Results (p. 15) report virtually undetectable P2Y12 immunoreactivity in microglia after LPS-induced activation, with reduced transcript levels. The Discussion (p. 21) likewise states that P2Y12 is down-regulated upon microglial activation. The culture portion has a separate citation and is not attributed to this source here. (LLM, conf=0.93)
- Partly supportedcites [34] Gosselin, D. et al. An environment-dependent transcriptional network specifies human microglia identity. Science 356, eaal3222 (2017). sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The ‘An environment-dependent transcriptional network’ section identifies mouse P2ry12 among genes downregulated in culture, supporting reduced expression upon culture. It does not establish that expression is completely lost, or specifically show P2RY12 loss in cultured human microglia. The activation claim is attached to a different citation and is not assessed here. (LLM, conf=0.87)
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
- Supported
Every source the paper cites for this claim was checked and supports it.
In the paper
“Overall, 11% of MiGA eQTL colocalizations could be reproduced in the Young et al. data, and 15% of the Young et al. colocalizations could be found in the MiGA data, at a relaxed PP4 > 0.5, whereas sharing between the two monocyte datasets41,42 was 17–24% with the same parameters (Supplementary Fig. 13).”
§ Genetic analysis of the human microglia transcriptome across brain regions, aging and disease pathologies > Results > Genetic effects in microglia mediate neurological disease
What the sources say
- Supportedcites [41] Fairfax, B. P. et al. Innate immune activity conditions the effect of regulatory variants upon monocyte gene expression. Science 343, 1246949 (2014). source
The citation identifies one of the monocyte eQTL datasets used in the citing authors’ comparison. The source’s Results section, “Identifying Context-Specific Local Genetic Regulatory Variants” (page not provided), reports monocyte expression data and cis-eQTL associations. The 17–24% sharing figure is presented as the citing authors’ comparison in their Supplementary Fig. 13, not as a result attributed to this source. (LLM, conf=0.90)
- Supportedcites [42] Navarro, E. et al. Dysregulation of mitochondrial and proteolysosomal genes in Parkinson’s disease myeloid cells. Nat. Aging 1, 850–863 (2021). source
The Results section (‘PD common variants alter gene expression in monocytes’) describes cis-eQTL analysis of monocytes from 180 subjects, and the Methods (‘Quantitative Trait Loci Analysis’) describes the eQTL mapping. The citation attached to ‘two monocyte datasets’ identifies this paper as one of the datasets; the sharing percentages are presented as the citing authors’ comparison in their Supplementary Fig. 13, not as results attributed to this source. (LLM, conf=0.87)
hedgedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Supported
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“Regional and age-related differences in microglial density, morphology, gene, and protein expression have previously been described for both animals and humans5,6,9,60,61.”
§ Genetic analysis of the human microglia transcriptome across brain regions, aging and disease pathologies > Discussion
What the sources say
- Partly supportedcites [5] van der Poel, M. et al. Transcriptional profiling of human microglia reveals grey–white matter heterogeneity and multiple sclerosis-associated changes. Nat. Commun. 10, 1139 (2019). sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Discussion reports regional differences in human microglial gene expression and density, and the Introduction reports age-related gene-expression changes in humans. The cited paper does not establish the full combination of regional and age-related differences in density, morphology, and gene and protein expression for both animals and humans. The indexed passages provide section labels but no page numbers. (LLM, conf=0.86)
- Partly supportedcites [6] Grabert, K. et al. Microglial brain region-dependent diversity and selective regional sensitivities to aging. Nat. Neurosci. 19, 504–516 (2016). sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Introduction and Results (‘Ageing of microglia occurs in a region-dependent manner’; pages unavailable) describe regional differences and age-related changes in microglial gene expression in adult mice. The Discussion also reports regional variation in mouse microglial morphology and density. These passages do not establish the claimed differences in human microglia, so the ‘both animals and humans’ scope is not supported by this source. (LLM, conf=0.87)
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [9] Masuda, T. et al. Spatial and temporal heterogeneity of mouse and human microglia at single-cell resolution. Nature 566, 388–392 (2019). source
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [60] Mittelbronn, M., Dietz, K., Schluesener, H. J. & Meyermann, R. Local distribution of microglia in the normal adult human central nervous system differs by up to one order of magnitude. Acta Neuropathol. 101, 249–255 (2001). source
- Partly supportedcites [61] Olah, M. et al. Identification of a microglia phenotype supportive of remyelination. Glia 60, 306–321 (2012). sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Discussion (page not specified) compares microglial gene-expression patterns in the subventricular zone and corpus callosum and suggests regional differences in microglial phenotype. Its reported changes in microglial number, morphology, and protein expression concern demyelination and remyelination in animals, not age-related differences. The passages do not establish the claimed differences across both animals and humans. (LLM, conf=0.86)
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Partly supported
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“Of interest also are a downregulation of C2, P2RY12, and P2RY13, key players in microglia-neuron interactions63,64, as well as genes related to age-related disorders: MS4A4A, MS4A6A, BST1 and P2RY12.”
§ Genetic analysis of the human microglia transcriptome across brain regions, aging and disease pathologies > Discussion
What the sources say
- Partly supportedcites [63] Badimon, A. et al. Negative feedback control of neuronal activity by microglia. Nature 586, 417–423 (2020). sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The paper’s Abstract (page unavailable) shows that microglial P2RY12 helps recruit microglial processes to active synapses, supporting its role in microglia–neuron interactions. Extended Data Figure 10 reports reduced P2ry12 expression in mouse models of neurodegenerative disease, but it does not establish age-related downregulation of the listed genes or identify C2 and P2RY13 as key players in those interactions. (LLM, conf=0.88)
- Could not verifycites [64] Savage, J. C. et al. Nuclear receptors license phagocytosis by TREM2+ myeloid cells in mouse models of Alzheimer’s disease. J. Neurosci. 35, 6532–6543 (2015). sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The citation is attached to the description of C2, P2RY12, and P2RY13 as key players in microglia–neuron interactions. The Discussion addresses myeloid-cell activity in Alzheimer’s disease, but our copy does not connect those three genes to microglia–neuron interactions. Searches for the gene names and related terms also found no passage establishing that point; the age-related downregulation appears to be the citing authors’ own observation. (LLM, conf=0.74)
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Partly supported
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“Previous analyses have prioritized ECHDC3, as it is upregulated in AD post-mortem brains53,54, and an eQTL for ECHDC3 was seen in whole blood55, though it did not colocalize with the GWAS SNP23.”
§ Genetic analysis of the human microglia transcriptome across brain regions, aging and disease pathologies > Results > Neurological disease loci regulate microglia gene expression
What the sources say
- Could not verifycites [53] Zhang, B. et al. Integrated systems approach identifies genetic nodes and networks in late-onset Alzheimer’s disease. Cell 153, 707–720 (2013). sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The citation to this paper is attached to the claim that the ECHDC3 eQTL did not colocalize with the GWAS SNP. The Results section discusses brain cis eSNPs, but our copy does not report that ECHDC3-specific colocalization result (searched for ECHDC3, colocalization, and the whole-blood eQTL). (LLM, conf=0.75)
- Supportedcites [54] Desikan, R. S. et al. Polygenic overlap between C-reactive protein, plasma lipids, and Alzheimer disease. Circulation 131, 2061–2069 (2015). source
The citation to this paper is attached to the statement that ECHDC3 is upregulated in AD post-mortem brains, not to the separately cited eQTL or colocalization statements. The Results report significantly increased ECHDC3 transcript expression in AD brains compared with control brains. (LLM, conf=0.93)
- Could not verifycites [55] Zhernakova, D. V. et al. Identification of context-dependent expression quantitative trait loci in whole blood. Nat. Genet. 49, 139–145 (2017). sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The source reports whole-blood eQTLs generally (Abstract), but the passages in our copy do not identify an eQTL for ECHDC3. Searches for ECHDC3 and for an ECHDC3 whole-blood eQTL found no matching passage. The other parts of the sentence have different citations and are not judged here. (LLM, conf=0.72)
- Could not verifycites [23] Kunkle, B. W. et al. Genetic meta-analysis of diagnosed Alzheimer’s disease identifies new risk loci and implicates Aβ, tau, immunity and lipid processing. Nat. Genet. 51, 414–430 (2019). sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The citation is attached to the claim that the ECHDC3 eQTL did not colocalize with the GWAS SNP. The Results (Meta-analysis of Alzheimer’s disease GWAS) identify an ECHDC3 risk signal, and the Methods (Regulatory variant and eQTL analysis) describe colocalization testing, but neither reports a colocalization result for ECHDC3. Searches for ECHDC3 with eQTL and colocalization terms did not locate that result in our copy; page numbers were unavailable. (LLM, conf=0.72)
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
- Could not verify
Every source the paper cites for this claim was checked and supports it.
In the paper
“The sharing between our microglia and previously published microglia26 was low (Fig. 5b), with only a few known loci in AD and PD (BIN1, PICALM, CHRNB1), presumably due to lower power in the Young et al. data compared to our multi-tissue meta-analysis.”
§ Genetic analysis of the human microglia transcriptome across brain regions, aging and disease pathologies > Results > Genetic effects in microglia mediate neurological disease
What the sources say
- Supportedcites [26] Young, A. M. H. et al. A map of transcriptional heterogeneity and regulatory variation in human microglia. Nat. Genet. 53, 861–868 (2021). source
The citation identifies the previously published microglia dataset used for comparison. The Discussion describes this study as creating an eQTL map in primary human microglia. The low sharing and proposed power difference are conclusions of the citing paper, not findings attributed to Young et al. (LLM, conf=0.91)
hedged- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Supported
Every source the paper cites for this claim was checked and supports it.
In the paper
“A previous study prioritized P2RY12 at this locus due to an overlap with eQTLs in blood and brain57.”
§ Genetic analysis of the human microglia transcriptome across brain regions, aging and disease pathologies > Results > Neurological disease loci regulate microglia gene expression
What the sources say
- Supportedcites [57] Grenn, F. P. et al. The Parkinson’s disease genome-wide association study locus browser. Mov. Disord. 35, 2056–2067 (2020). source
In Results, Use Case Scenario 1 (Locus 16, rs11707416; page unavailable), the paper identifies P2RY12 as the primary candidate nominated by its browser data and reports overlap between GWAS and eQTL data in both brain and blood. This supports the citing sentence’s account of why the study prioritized P2RY12. (LLM, conf=0.92)
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Supported
The cited sources that could be checked couldn’t confirm or dispute this claim.
In the paper
“Duplicated and up to third-degree related samples were removed based on pairwise kinship coefficients estimated using KING97 (Supplementary Fig. 10a).”
§ Genetic analysis of the human microglia transcriptome across brain regions, aging and disease pathologies > Methods > Genotype Quality Control and Imputation
What the sources say
- Could not verifycites [97] Chang, C. C. et al. Second-generation PLINK: rising to the challenge of larger and richer datasets. Gigascience 4, 7 (2015). sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Findings > Performance comparisons passages describe PLINK runtimes and marker pruning, not removal of duplicated or related samples. Searches for KING, pairwise kinship coefficients, and third-degree relatedness found no passage in our copy addressing the claimed procedure. (LLM, conf=0.75)
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
- Could not verify
The cited sources that could be checked couldn’t confirm or dispute this claim.
In the paper
“P2RY12 has been shown to play a role in microglia migration, activation, and neuronal activity64,75.”
§ Genetic analysis of the human microglia transcriptome across brain regions, aging and disease pathologies > Discussion
What the sources say
- Could not verifycites [64] Savage, J. C. et al. Nuclear receptors license phagocytosis by TREM2+ myeloid cells in mouse models of Alzheimer’s disease. J. Neurosci. 35, 6532–6543 (2015). sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Discussion addresses TREM2-positive myeloid cells and their inflammatory phenotype, not a role for P2RY12 in microglial migration, activation, or neuronal activity. Searches of our copy for P2RY12, P2Y12, and those functions found no passage addressing the claimed P2RY12 role. (LLM, conf=0.76)
- Could not verifycites [75] Marsh, S. E. et al. Single cell sequencing reveals glial specific responses to tissue processing & enzymatic dissociation in mice and humans. Preprint at bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.12.03.408542 (2020). sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Abstract and results passages discuss microglial gene-expression changes caused by tissue processing and enzymatic dissociation. Searches for P2RY12 and for purinergic-receptor involvement in migration or neuronal activity found no passage in our copy addressing the claimed roles. (LLM, conf=0.75)
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
- Could not verify
The cited sources that could be checked couldn’t confirm or dispute this claim.
In the paper
“DNA samples were matched to the RNA-seq data to confirm the same donor origin using the MBV tool from QTLtools98 (Supplementary Fig. 10b) and sex mismatching samples were removed by comparing DNA inferred sex from PLINK to RNA gene expression of the UTY and XIST genes (Supplementary Fig. 10c).”
§ Genetic analysis of the human microglia transcriptome across brain regions, aging and disease pathologies > Methods > Genotype Quality Control and Imputation
What the sources say
- Could not verifycites [98] Das, S. et al. Next-generation genotype imputation service and methods. Nat. Genet. 48, 1284–1287 (2016). sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Abstract describes a genotype-imputation service and its quality checks, while the Online Methods describe comparisons of imputation tools; neither addresses matching DNA samples to RNA-seq data or removing sex-mismatched samples. Searches for donor matching and for PLINK, UTY, and XIST found no passage supporting the claim. (LLM, conf=0.76)
plainn = 98- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
- Could not verify
Every source the paper cites for this claim was checked and supports it.
In the paper
“We could not control for all these potential confounders, even though these factors could contribute to gene expression changes76,77.”
§ Genetic analysis of the human microglia transcriptome across brain regions, aging and disease pathologies > Discussion
What the sources say
- Supportedcites [76] Mattei, D. et al. Enzymatic dissociation induces transcriptional and proteotype bias in brain cell populations. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 21, 7944 (2020). source
The Introduction identifies enzymatic dissociation as a source of artifacts in transcriptomic analyses. The Discussion reports that dissociation deregulated gene expression in brain cells, supporting the cited point that a potential confounding factor could contribute to gene-expression changes. The citing authors’ inability to control for their confounders is their own statement, not a finding attributed to this paper. (LLM, conf=0.85)
- Supportedcites [77] Lee, M. N. et al. Common genetic variants modulate pathogen-sensing responses in human dendritic cells. Science 343, 1246980 (2014). source
The Introduction says genetic variants contribute to variation in gene expression and that responses can differ with environmental stimuli. The Results section on reQTLs also identifies population structure and expression heterogeneity as systematic confounders. The citing authors’ statement that they could not control for all such factors is their own limitation, not a finding attributed to this paper. (LLM, conf=0.84)
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Supported
The cited sources that could be checked couldn’t confirm or dispute this claim.
In the paper
“Genetic ancestry of samples was confirmed by principal components analysis using the PLINK program99 and MDS (multidimensional scaling) values of study subjects were compared to those of 1000 Genome Project samples (Phase 3) (Supplementary Fig. 10d).”
§ Genetic analysis of the human microglia transcriptome across brain regions, aging and disease pathologies > Methods > Genotype Quality Control and Imputation
What the sources say
- Could not verifycites [99] Loh, P.-R. et al. Reference-based phasing using the Haplotype Reference Consortium panel. Nat. Genet. 48, 1443–1448 (2016). sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Online Methods (UK Biobank data set) mention PLINK for sample exclusions, and the Results (Phasing accuracy using the 1000 Genomes and HRC panels) use 1000 Genomes Phase 3 samples for phasing benchmarks. Neither passage reports confirming study subjects’ ancestry by principal components analysis or comparing their MDS values with 1000 Genomes samples. Searches for PCA, MDS, ancestry comparison, and PLINK did not locate that procedure in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.76)
plainn = 98- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
- Could not verify
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Analysis of upstream regulators of the four clusters using Ingenuity Pathway Analysis (IPA) was inconclusive (Supplementary Table 9).”
§ Genetic analysis of the human microglia transcriptome across brain regions, aging and disease pathologies > Results > Biological factors driving the microglia transcriptome
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Cluster 3 contained genes specifically downregulated in the SVZ (e.g. CX3CL1, CCR2, FCGR3B) and cluster 4 contained genes upregulated in SVZ (e.g. IL10, CLU, CD83), compared to the other three regions (Fig. 2e).”
§ Genetic analysis of the human microglia transcriptome across brain regions, aging and disease pathologies > Results > Biological factors driving the microglia transcriptome
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“We found that genes implicated in inflammatory processes were highly expressed in cluster 2 (Fig. 2f), whereas genes related to homeostatic functions of microglial cells were mainly present in cluster 1.”
§ Genetic analysis of the human microglia transcriptome across brain regions, aging and disease pathologies > Results > Biological factors driving the microglia transcriptome
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“176 transcripts in 132 genes had evidence of DTU (log odds ratio > 1; empirical FDR < 0.1), with a majority of transcripts coming from comparisons with the SVZ (Extended Data Fig. 1a).”
§ Genetic analysis of the human microglia transcriptome across brain regions, aging and disease pathologies > Results > Biological factors driving the microglia transcriptome
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“eQTLs for CASS4 are significant in both MiGA and monocytes (MyND) but with opposite directions of effect (Fig. 4g), suggesting that the causal variant is located in a complex regulatory element where both enhancing and repressing mechanisms are at play.”
§ Genetic analysis of the human microglia transcriptome across brain regions, aging and disease pathologies > Results > Genetic regulatory effects in microglia
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“We observed colocalization with eQTLs and sQTLs in MS4A6A, as well as eQTLs in MS4A4A and MS4A4E (Fig. 5f).”
§ Genetic analysis of the human microglia transcriptome across brain regions, aging and disease pathologies > Results > Splicing QTLs identify additional disease-associated loci
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Sharing with monocyte eQTLs was generally slightly lower than with microglia and sharing with bulk DLPFC eQTLs was lowest.”
§ Genetic analysis of the human microglia transcriptome across brain regions, aging and disease pathologies > Results > Genetic regulatory effects in microglia
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“By mapping sQTLs we have shown that the known AD risk association with CD33 exon 2 splicing is also present in microglia, and added disease associations that may act through splicing, such as MS4A6A in AD, SIPA1L2 and FAM49B in PD, IRF3 in SCZ, STK4 and GMIP in BD, and CD37 and EFCAB13 in MS.”
§ Genetic analysis of the human microglia transcriptome across brain regions, aging and disease pathologies > Discussion
hedgedconditionaln = 93- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“We also observe multiple splicing QTLs, some previously reported (CD33, FAM49B), and some unreported (MS4A6A, BST1).”
§ Genetic analysis of the human microglia transcriptome across brain regions, aging and disease pathologies > Results > Genetic effects in microglia mediate neurological disease
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“We found that 10 out of 17 genes colocalizing in AD, 8 out of 18 in PD, 4 out of 9 in SCZ, and 3 out of 17 in MS include SNPs that overlap with microglial enhancers (Fig. 6a; Extended Data Fig. 7; Supplementary Fig. 20).”
§ Genetic analysis of the human microglia transcriptome across brain regions, aging and disease pathologies > Results > Neurological disease loci regulate microglia gene expression
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In the region-specific analysis, we observed between 67 and 199 genes with a cis-eQTL (eGenes) and 253 to 426 genes with a cis-sQTL (sGenes) per region (FDR < 0.05; Supplementary Table 17, Supplementary Fig. 11).”
§ Genetic analysis of the human microglia transcriptome across brain regions, aging and disease pathologies > Results > Genetic regulatory effects in microglia
plainn = 216- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Fine-mapping revealed that the lead GWAS SNP rs11707416 was suggested as a causal SNP by multiple fine-mapping tools (a consensus SNP) and is in perfect LD (r2 = 1) with the lead QTL SNP rs3732765 (Fig. 6g).”
§ Genetic analysis of the human microglia transcriptome across brain regions, aging and disease pathologies > Results > Neurological disease loci regulate microglia gene expression
plainconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The GWAS lead SNP and the QTL lead SNP are in moderate LD (r2 = 0.65), as are two of the three fine-mapped SNPs (Fig. 6d; Supplementary Table 22).”
§ Genetic analysis of the human microglia transcriptome across brain regions, aging and disease pathologies > Results > Neurological disease loci regulate microglia gene expression
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Microglia from SVZ exhibited lower pairwise sharing of eQTLs with other regions, with the lowest sharing by magnitude observed between SVZ and MFG (41%), consistent with observed transcriptomic differences between these two regions.”
§ Genetic analysis of the human microglia transcriptome across brain regions, aging and disease pathologies > Results > Genetic regulatory effects in microglia
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In each disease there are genes that appear to be microglia-specific (BIN1, PYCR2), shared between microglia and monocytes (CASS4, CTSB), and shared between microglia and brain (ZNF646, P2RY12).”
§ Genetic analysis of the human microglia transcriptome across brain regions, aging and disease pathologies > Results > Genetic effects in microglia mediate neurological disease
hedgedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“We overlaid all sQTL junctions that colocalized with the AD risk locus and found that the strongest colocalization signals highlighted a cluster of introns in the middle of the gene, with the 5’ intron in the cluster having the strongest colocalization.”
§ Genetic analysis of the human microglia transcriptome across brain regions, aging and disease pathologies > Results > Splicing QTLs identify additional disease-associated loci
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“P2RY12 is an eQTL (lead SNP rs3732765) identified in the METASOFT meta-analysis, with the lead QTL SNP rs3732765-A decreasing P2RY12 expression (Fig. 6e).”
§ Genetic analysis of the human microglia transcriptome across brain regions, aging and disease pathologies > Results > Neurological disease loci regulate microglia gene expression
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“AD and PD had the highest number of colocalizing loci in each QTL dataset, compared to the other diseases (Fig. 5a, Supplementary Table 21), with 10–30% of loci containing at least one colocalized gene, depending on the stringency of the H4 posterior probability (PP4), with lower proportions observed in BD, SCZ and MS.”
§ Genetic analysis of the human microglia transcriptome across brain regions, aging and disease pathologies > Results > Genetic effects in microglia mediate neurological disease
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Similarly, we found 225 transcripts from 150 genes exhibiting DTU with age (FDR < 0.1) (Extended Data Fig. 2a), where the balance between a long and short isoform shifts over age (Extended Data Fig. 2b).”
§ Genetic analysis of the human microglia transcriptome across brain regions, aging and disease pathologies > Results > Biological factors driving the microglia transcriptome
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“USP6NL harbors an expression QTL observed in all four microglial regions, with the lead QTL SNP rs7912495-G increasing USP6NL expression (Fig. 6b).”
§ Genetic analysis of the human microglia transcriptome across brain regions, aging and disease pathologies > Results > Neurological disease loci regulate microglia gene expression
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“For sQTLs, we found overall higher regional sharing effects compared to eQTLs, but still following the same trends as for eQTLs (Fig. 4b, lower triangle).”
§ Genetic analysis of the human microglia transcriptome across brain regions, aging and disease pathologies > Results > Genetic regulatory effects in microglia
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Transcription factor binding motif analysis was inconclusive, with three of the tested SNPs rs143807787, rs74347557, and rs7912495 predicted to disrupt multiple motifs in different directions (Supplementary Table 23).”
§ Genetic analysis of the human microglia transcriptome across brain regions, aging and disease pathologies > Results > Neurological disease loci regulate microglia gene expression
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In addition, there are 4 other SNPs prioritized by fine-mapping, 2 of which were in perfect or very high LD with the lead QTL SNP.”
§ Genetic analysis of the human microglia transcriptome across brain regions, aging and disease pathologies > Results > Neurological disease loci regulate microglia gene expression
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“We have identified specific disease colocalizations that may not be captured in monocytes or bulk brain tissue, like BIN1, USP6NL, and PICALM in AD, P2RY12 in PD, PLXNB2 in MS, and IFRD1 in SCZ.”
§ Genetic analysis of the human microglia transcriptome across brain regions, aging and disease pathologies > Discussion
hedgedcorrelationaln = 93- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“We mapped sQTLs with between 0 and 20 PEER factors as covariates in our QTL model and determined 5 to be optimal in MFG, STG and THA. 0 PEER factors were used for SVZ (Supplementary Fig. 11).”
§ Genetic analysis of the human microglia transcriptome across brain regions, aging and disease pathologies > Methods > Quantitative Trait Loci mapping
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Transcripts form 2 k-means clusters”
§ Genetic analysis of the human microglia transcriptome across brain regions, aging and disease pathologies > Extended Data
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“We tested numbers of PEER factors from 0 to 20 and found that between 5 and 10 factors produced the largest number of eGenes in each region (Supplementary Fig. 11).”
§ Genetic analysis of the human microglia transcriptome across brain regions, aging and disease pathologies > Methods > Quantitative Trait Loci mapping
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Heatmap of relative transcript usage between regions using all 176 transcripts from pairwise comparisons of differential transcript usage (DTU; empirical FDR < 0.1)”
§ Genetic analysis of the human microglia transcriptome across brain regions, aging and disease pathologies > Extended Data
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Notably, there was no colocalization of the upstream ECHDC3 gene in any tested cell type, suggesting that USP6NL is the AD risk gene at this locus.”
§ Genetic analysis of the human microglia transcriptome across brain regions, aging and disease pathologies > Results > Neurological disease loci regulate microglia gene expression
hedged- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“The CD33 risk locus has been implicated in AD susceptibility59.”
§ Genetic analysis of the human microglia transcriptome across brain regions, aging and disease pathologies > Results > Splicing QTLs identify additional disease-associated loci
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [59] Böttcher, C. et al. Human microglia regional heterogeneity and phenotypes determined by multiplexed single-cell mass cytometry. Nat. Neurosci. 22, 78–90 (2019). source
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Microglia from the SVZ had the most region-specific effects with 1,045, most likely because the transcriptomic profile of this region is most distinct (Supplementary Table 20).”
§ Genetic analysis of the human microglia transcriptome across brain regions, aging and disease pathologies > Results > Genetic regulatory effects in microglia
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“We demonstrate that transcriptional heterogeneity in human microglia varies between brain regions and across aging.”
§ Genetic analysis of the human microglia transcriptome across brain regions, aging and disease pathologies > Discussion
boostedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“This approach allowed us to identify candidate functional variants in multiple disease susceptibility loci that modulate microglia-specific enhancer activity and regulate causal gene expression, which in turn likely modify disease risk by altering the function of microglia (or other myeloid cells) in the brain.”
§ Genetic analysis of the human microglia transcriptome across brain regions, aging and disease pathologies > Discussion
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Together, our results indicate that the microglial phenotype ages in a generally uniform manner across brain regions, with a distinct aging trajectory observed in a minority of genes.”
§ Genetic analysis of the human microglia transcriptome across brain regions, aging and disease pathologies > Results > Biological factors driving the microglia transcriptome
hedgedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“This suggests that splicing QTLs are less cell type-specific, presumably due to the association with distinct types of regulatory elements.”
§ Genetic analysis of the human microglia transcriptome across brain regions, aging and disease pathologies > Results > Genetic effects in microglia mediate neurological disease
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“We generated a catalog of eQTLs and sQTLs in microglia and thereby validated and extended the list of disease genes and putative causal variants underlying risk for neurodegenerative and psychiatric diseases.”
§ Genetic analysis of the human microglia transcriptome across brain regions, aging and disease pathologies > Discussion
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Previous analyses in peripheral monocytes found association between lead GWAS SNP rs3865444 and the inclusion of CD33 exon 259.”
§ Genetic analysis of the human microglia transcriptome across brain regions, aging and disease pathologies > Results > Splicing QTLs identify additional disease-associated loci
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [59] Böttcher, C. et al. Human microglia regional heterogeneity and phenotypes determined by multiplexed single-cell mass cytometry. Nat. Neurosci. 22, 78–90 (2019). source
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“rs2162254-A is associated with an increased usage of this intron, which may result in increased production of the shorter isoforms, which could have a downstream consequence on MS4A6A protein function.”
§ Genetic analysis of the human microglia transcriptome across brain regions, aging and disease pathologies > Results > Splicing QTLs identify additional disease-associated loci
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“We have generated an atlas of genetic effects on the human microglia transcriptome, which allowed us to identify potential causal genes and variants underlying risk for neurodegenerative and psychiatric diseases.”
§ Genetic analysis of the human microglia transcriptome across brain regions, aging and disease pathologies > Discussion
plainconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The investigators were not blinded for group allocation (diagnosis, sex, age etc.) during data analysis since adjustment for these factors was necessary for the data analyses.”
§ Genetic analysis of the human microglia transcriptome across brain regions, aging and disease pathologies > Methods > Statistics and reproducibility
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“All autopsies were performed with written consent from the legal next-of-kin.”
§ Genetic analysis of the human microglia transcriptome across brain regions, aging and disease pathologies > Methods > Human brain tissue
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Furthermore, our ability to detect additional disease-associated eQTLs may be obscured due to the use of bulk RNA-sequencing data.”
§ Genetic analysis of the human microglia transcriptome across brain regions, aging and disease pathologies > Discussion
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Our findings represent mechanistic hypotheses that can now be tested with further experimental work at both the level of individual variants and the candidate genes.”
§ Genetic analysis of the human microglia transcriptome across brain regions, aging and disease pathologies > Discussion
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The age range of the 100 donors is between 21 and 103 years old”
§ Genetic analysis of the human microglia transcriptome across brain regions, aging and disease pathologies > Methods > Statistics and reproducibility
plainn = 100- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Besides neuroinflammation, hypoxia, and long postmortem intervals, technical artifacts (enzymatic digestion, temperature changes, sorting) may cause microglial activation.”
§ Genetic analysis of the human microglia transcriptome across brain regions, aging and disease pathologies > Discussion
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“58 of them were female”
§ Genetic analysis of the human microglia transcriptome across brain regions, aging and disease pathologies > Methods > Statistics and reproducibility
plainn = 100- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“We sorted the microglial cells with CD11b+ beads. This marker is not restricted to microglia and may capture small fractions of other myeloid cells.”
§ Genetic analysis of the human microglia transcriptome across brain regions, aging and disease pathologies > Discussion
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“We increased power by combining the four regions in a meta-analysis, with the caveat of not adjusting for shared donors, which will have increased our false discovery rate.”
§ Genetic analysis of the human microglia transcriptome across brain regions, aging and disease pathologies > Discussion
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The study was performed under IRB-approved guidance and regulations to keep all patient information strictly de-identified.”
§ Genetic analysis of the human microglia transcriptome across brain regions, aging and disease pathologies > Methods > Human brain tissue
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“RNA-seq quality control was performed applying filters to remove samples: 1) samples with less than 10M reads aligned from STAR; 2) samples with more than 20% of the reads aligned to ribosomal regions; 3) samples with less than 10% of the reads mapping to coding regions; 4) samples from brain regions with fewer than 20 donors.”
§ Genetic analysis of the human microglia transcriptome across brain regions, aging and disease pathologies > Methods > Microglial isolation and RNA sequencing
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The permission to collect human brain material was obtained from the Ethical Committee of the VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, and the Mount Sinai Institutional Review Board (IRB).”
§ Genetic analysis of the human microglia transcriptome across brain regions, aging and disease pathologies > Methods > Human brain tissue
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“All research conformed to the principles of the Helsinki Declaration.”
§ Genetic analysis of the human microglia transcriptome across brain regions, aging and disease pathologies > Methods > Human brain tissue
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“All analyses were adjusted for age, gender, and other covariates.”
§ Genetic analysis of the human microglia transcriptome across brain regions, aging and disease pathologies > Methods > Statistics and reproducibility
plainn = 100- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In total, 59 out of 314 samples were excluded due to insufficient RNA-seq quality or insufficient sample size by brain region.”
§ Genetic analysis of the human microglia transcriptome across brain regions, aging and disease pathologies > Methods > Statistics and reproducibility
plainn = 314- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Informed consent for autopsy, the use of brain tissue and accompanied clinical information for research purposes was obtained per donor ante-mortem.”
§ Genetic analysis of the human microglia transcriptome across brain regions, aging and disease pathologies > Methods > Human brain tissue
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“To select high-quality data, we applied an initial genotyping quality control using bcftools (v1.9) and vcftools (v0.1.15), keeping SNPs with call rate > 95%, minor allele frequency (MAF) > 5%, Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium (HWE) P-value > 1 × 10−6, and sample call rate > 95%.”
§ Genetic analysis of the human microglia transcriptome across brain regions, aging and disease pathologies > Methods > Genotype Quality Control and Imputation
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
The paper relies on this without support.
Investigations of QTLs in microglia have been limited by the availability of microglial samples from the number of subjects required to perform well-powered genomic analyses.
“Investigations of QTLs in microglia have been limited by the availability of microglial samples from the number of subjects required to perform well-powered genomic analyses.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Most of the common variants that have been identified are located outside protein-coding regions.
“This is a complicated task, as most of the common variants that have been identified are located outside protein-coding regions.”
The paper relies on this without support.
These variants influence gene expression through complex regulatory mechanisms, such as altering enhancer activity, which often affect a gene beyond the nearest gene.
“These variants influence gene expression through complex regulatory mechanisms, such as altering enhancer activity, which often affect a gene beyond the nearest gene.”
The paper relies on this without support.
P2RY12 is highly expressed in microglia in comparison to other brain and myeloid cell types.
“P2RY12 is one of the P2Y metabotropic G-protein-coupled purinergic receptors, which is highly expressed in microglia in comparison to other brain and myeloid cell types.”
The paper relies on this without support.
P2RY12 is one of the P2Y metabotropic G-protein-coupled purinergic receptors.
“P2RY12 is one of the P2Y metabotropic G-protein-coupled purinergic receptors, which is highly expressed in microglia in comparison to other brain and myeloid cell types.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The AD risk association with CD33 exon 2 splicing is known.
“By mapping sQTLs we have shown that the known AD risk association with CD33 exon 2 splicing is also present in microglia, and added disease associations that may act through splicing, such as MS4A6A in AD, SIPA1L2 and FAM49B in PD, IRF3 in SCZ, STK4 and GMIP in BD, and CD37 and EFCAB13 in MS.”
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Additionally, very few transcriptomic studies provide information on acute premortem variables or cause of death, which are particularly important as they may potentially have a much larger effect on RNA quality and gene expression71–76,78–80.”
From Dissection of artifactual and confounding glial signatures by single-cell sequencing of mouse and human brain (2022) · cites this paper as [80]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“The directional effect of the AD risk allele of rs10792832 on PICALM expression was consistent with other hMG eQTL findings8,9,25.”
From PICALM Alzheimer’s risk allele causes aberrant lipid droplets in microglia (2025) · cites this paper as [8]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Recent human genetic studies revealed that Alzheimer's disease risk loci are enriched in genes expressed in myeloid cells, including microglia, the brain's resident immune cells.”
From Targeting Microglial Transcriptional Reprogramming as a Therapy Strategy for Alzheimer's Disease (2026) · cites this paper as [6]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Most notably, these genetic studies implicate central roles for the innate immune system, with many AD risk genes being primarily expressed in microglia (Efthymiou and Goate, 2017; Karch and Goate, 2015; Lopes et al., 2022).”
From Alzheimer’s genetic risk factor CASS4 controls microglial focal adhesion biology and amyloidosis (2026) · cites this paper as Lopes et al., 2022
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe check wasn’t confident either way, so it gives no verdict — never disputed.
In the citing paper
“Previous studies suggest that lowering APOE levels may confer protection against AD56–59.”
From Deletion of SPI1 in microglia exacerbates amyloid pathology by impairing microglial response in Alzheimer’s disease models (2026) · cites this paper as [59]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
The check wasn’t confident either way, so it gives no verdict — never disputed.
In the citing paper
“Interestingly, a recent study demonstrated that SPI1 has a low correlation in gene expression between peripheral monocytes and brain microglia46.”
From Effects of SPI1-mediated transcriptome remodeling on Alzheimer's disease-related phenotypes in mouse models of Aβ amyloidosis (2024) · cites this paper as [46]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Citations
Cites
Moderated estimation of fold change and dispersion for RNA-seq data with DESeq2
Love, M. I., Huber, W., & Anders, S. (2014) · Genome Biology · doi:10.1186/s13059-014-0550-8 · Cited by 95,106
STAR: ultrafast universal RNA-seq aligner
Dobin, A., Davis, C. A., Schlesinger, F., Drenkow, J., Zaleski, C., Jha, S., Batut, P., Chaisson, M., & Gingeras, T. R. (2013) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/bts635 · Cited by 51,709
Robinson, M. D., McCarthy, D. J., & Smyth, G. K. (2010) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btp616 · Cited by 41,364
RSEM: accurate transcript quantification from RNA-Seq data with or without a reference genome
Li, B., & Dewey, C. N. (2011) · BMC Bioinformatics · doi:10.1186/1471-2105-12-323 · Cited by 22,179
A global reference for human genetic variation
The 1000 Genomes Project Consortium, authors, C., Auton, A., Abecasis, G. R., Steering committee, Altshuler, D. M., Durbin, R. M., Abecasis, G. R., Bentley, D. R., Chakravarti, A., et al. (2015) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature15393 · Cited by 18,247
Algorithm AS 136: A K-Means Clustering Algorithm
Hartigan, J. A., & Wong, M. A. (1979) · Applied Statistics · doi:10.2307/2346830 · Cited by 14,523
ggplot2: Elegant Graphics for Data Analysis
Wickham, H. (2009) · doi:10.1007/978-0-387-98141-3 · Cited by 14,447
Second-generation PLINK: rising to the challenge of larger and richer datasets
Chang, C. C., Chow, C. C., Tellier, L. C., Vattikuti, S., Purcell, S. M., & Lee, J. J. (2015) · Gigascience · doi:10.1186/s13742-015-0047-8 · Cited by 12,709
Cingolani, P., Platts, A., Wang, L. L., Coon, M., Nguyen, T., Wang, L., Land, S. J., Lu, X., & Ruden, D. M. (2012) · Fly · doi:10.4161/fly.19695 · Cited by 11,816
Biological insights from 108 schizophrenia-associated genetic loci
Schizophrenia Working Group of the Psychiatric Genomics Consortium (2014) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature13595 · Cited by 7,577
Self-citation
Cited by
Sorted by citations
New insights into the genetic etiology of Alzheimer’s disease and related dementias
Bellenguez, C., Küçükali, F., Jansen, I. E., Kleineidam, L., Moreno-Grau, S., Amin, N., Naj, A. C., Campos-Martin, R., Grenier-Boley, B., Andrade, V., et al. (2022) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/s41588-022-01024-z · Cited by 2,498
Self-citationFunctional roles of reactive astrocytes in neuroinflammation and neurodegeneration
Patani, R., Hardingham, G. E., & Liddelow, S. A. (2023) · Nature Reviews Neurology · doi:10.1038/s41582-023-00822-1 · Cited by 531
Genetics and Pathogenesis of Parkinson's Syndrome
Ye, H., Robak, L. A., Yu, M., Cykowski, M. D., & Shulman, J. M. (2022) · Annual Review of Pathology Mechanisms of Disease · doi:10.1146/annurev-pathmechdis-031521-034145 · Cited by 503
A compendium of uniformly processed human gene expression and splicing quantitative trait loci
Kerimov, N., Hayhurst, J. D., Peikova, K., Manning, J. R., Walter, P., Kolberg, L., Samoviča, M., Sakthivel, M. P., Kuzmin, I., Trevanion, S. J., et al. (2021) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/s41588-021-00924-w · Cited by 440
Marsh, S. E., Walker, A. J., Kamath, T., Dissing-Olesen, L., Hammond, T. R., de Soysa, T. Y., Young, A. M. H., Murphy, S., Abdulraouf, A., Nadaf, N., et al. (2022) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/s41593-022-01022-8 · Cited by 431
Marsh, S. E., Kamath, T., Walker, A. J., Dissing-Olesen, L., Hammond, T. R., Young, A. M. H., Abdulraouf, A., Nadaf, N., Dufort, C., Murphy, S., et al. (2020) · doi:10.1101/2020.12.03.408542 · Cited by 430
Cholesterol and matrisome pathways dysregulated in astrocytes and microglia
TCW, J., Qian, L., Pipalia, N. H., Chao, M. J., Liang, S. A., Shi, Y., Jain, B. R., Bertelsen, S. E., Kapoor, M., Marcora, E., et al. (2022) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2022.05.017 · Cited by 411
Transforming the understanding of brain immunity
Castellani, G., Croese, T., Peralta Ramos, J. M., & Schwartz, M. (2023) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.abo7649 · Cited by 386
The complex genetic architecture of Alzheimer's disease: novel insights and future directions
Andrews, S. J., Renton, A. E., Fulton-Howard, B., Podlesny-Drabiniok, A., Marcora, E., & Goate, A. M. (2023) · eBioMedicine · doi:10.1016/j.ebiom.2023.104511 · Cited by 377
Microglia Phenotypes in Aging and Neurodegenerative Diseases
Wendimu, M. Y., & Hooks, S. B. (2022) · Cells · doi:10.3390/cells11132091 · Cited by 336
Transcriptional and epigenetic decoding of the microglial aging process
Li, X., Li, Y., Jin, Y., Zhang, Y., Wu, J., Xu, Z., Huang, Y., Cai, L., Gao, S., Liu, T., et al. (2023) · Nature Aging · doi:10.1038/s43587-023-00479-x · Cited by 234
Early Alzheimer’s disease pathology in human cortex involves transient cell states
Gazestani, V., Kamath, T., Nadaf, N. M., Dougalis, A., Burris, S. J., Rooney, B., Junkkari, A., Vanderburg, C., Pelkonen, A., Gomez-Budia, M., et al. (2023) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2023.08.005 · Cited by 209
Advancing cell therapy for neurodegenerative diseases
Temple, S. (2023) · Cell stem cell · doi:10.1016/j.stem.2023.03.017 · Cited by 221
Ferroptosis in Parkinson's disease: Molecular mechanisms and therapeutic potential
Ding, X.-S., Gao, L., Han, Z., Eleuteri, S., Shi, W., Shen, Y., Song, Z.-Y., Su, M., Yang, Q., Qu, Y., et al. (2023) · Ageing Research Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.arr.2023.102077 · Cited by 211
Microglial Piezo1 senses Aβ fibril stiffness to restrict Alzheimer’s disease
Hu, J., Chen, Q., Zhu, H., Hou, L., Liu, W., Yang, Q., Shen, H., Chai, G., Zhang, B., Chen, S., et al. (2022) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2022.10.021 · Cited by 196
TREM2 dependent and independent functions of microglia in Alzheimer’s disease
Hou, J., Chen, Y., Grajales-Reyes, G., & Colonna, M. (2022) · Molecular Neurodegeneration · doi:10.1186/s13024-022-00588-y · Cited by 191
Cell subtype-specific effects of genetic variation in the Alzheimer’s disease brain
Fujita, M., Gao, Z., Zeng, L., Aubin, C., White, C. C., Ng, B., Green, G. S., Rozenblatt–Rosen, O., Phillips, D., Amir-Zilberstein, L., et al. (2024) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/s41588-024-01685-y · Cited by 196
Genetics of the human microglia regulome refines Alzheimer’s disease risk loci
Kosoy, R., Fullard, J. F., Zeng, B., Bendl, J., Dong, P., Rahman, S., Kleopoulos, S. P., Shao, Z., Girdhar, K., Humphrey, J., et al. (2022) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/s41588-022-01149-1 · Cited by 168
Self-citationTargeting synapse function and loss for treatment of neurodegenerative diseases
Dejanovic, B., Sheng, M., & Hanson, J. E. (2023) · Nature Reviews Drug Discovery · doi:10.1038/s41573-023-00823-1 · Cited by 177
Humphrey, J., Venkatesh, S., Hasan, R., Herb, J. T., de Paiva Lopes, K., Küçükali, F., Byrska-Bishop, M., Evani, U. S., Narzisi, G., Fagegaltier, D., et al. (2023) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/s41593-022-01205-3 · Cited by 138
Self-citationFunctional regulatory variants implicate distinct transcriptional networks in dementia
Cooper, Y. A., Teyssier, N., Dräger, N. M., Guo, Q., Davis, J. E., Sattler, S. M., Yang, Z., Patel, A. M., Wu, S. J., Kosuri, S., et al. (2022) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.abi8654 · Cited by 121
Antignano, I., Liu, Y., Offermann, N., & Capasso, M. (2023) · Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences · doi:10.1007/s00018-023-04775-y · Cited by 117
Western, D., Timsina, J., Wang, L., Wang, C., Yang, C., Phillips, B., Wang, Y., Liu, M., Ali, M., Beric, A., et al. (2024) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/s41588-024-01972-8 · Cited by 111
Microglial efferocytosis: Diving into the Alzheimer’s disease gene pool
Romero-Molina, C., Garretti, F., Andrews, S. J., Marcora, E., & Goate, A. M. (2022) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2022.10.015 · Cited by 111
PICALM and Alzheimer’s Disease: An Update and Perspectives
Ando, K., Nagaraj, S., Küçükali, F., de Fisenne, M.-A., Kosa, A.-C., Doeraene, E., Lopez Gutierrez, L., Brion, J.-P., & Leroy, K. (2022) · Cells · doi:10.3390/cells11243994 · Cited by 104
Microglia-mediated synaptic pruning as a key deficit in neurodevelopmental disorders: Hype or hope?
Mordelt, A., & de Witte, L. D. (2023) · Current Opinion in Neurobiology · doi:10.1016/j.conb.2022.102674 · Cited by 100
Current Understanding of the Neural Stem Cell Niches
Llorente, V., Velarde, P., Desco, M., & Gómez‐Gaviro, M. V. (2022) · Cells · doi:10.3390/cells11193002 · Cited by 106
Noteworthy perspectives on microglia in neuropsychiatric disorders
Zhu, H., Guan, A., Liu, J., Li, P., Zhang, Z., & Wang, S. (2023) · Journal of Neuroinflammation · doi:10.1186/s12974-023-02901-y · Cited by 91
Zeng, B., Bendl, J. M., Kosoy, R., Fullard, J. F., Hoffman, G. E., & Roussos, P. (2022) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/s41588-021-00987-9 · Cited by 92
Step by step: towards a better understanding of the genetic architecture of Alzheimer’s disease
Lambert, J.-C., Ramirez, A., Grenier-Boley, B., & Bellenguez, C. (2023) · Molecular Psychiatry · doi:10.1038/s41380-023-02076-1 · Cited by 87
From genetic associations to genes: methods, applications, and challenges
Qi, T., Song, L., Guo, Y., Chen, C., & Yang, J. (2024) · Trends in Genetics · doi:10.1016/j.tig.2024.04.008 · Cited by 85
Tuddenham, J. F., Taga, M. F., Haage, V. C., Marshe, V. S., Roostaei, T., White, C. C., Lee, A., Fujita, M., Khairallah, A., Zhang, Y., et al. (2024) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/s41593-024-01764-7 · Cited by 79
Diversity and function of brain-associated macrophages
Mildenberger, W., Stifter, S. A., & Greter, M. (2022) · Current Opinion in Immunology · doi:10.1016/j.coi.2022.102181 · Cited by 81
Dissecting the human leptomeninges at single-cell resolution
Kearns, N. A., Iatrou, A., Flood, D. J., De Tissera, S., Mullaney, Z. M., Xu, J., Gaiteri, C., Bennett, D. A., & Wang, Y. (2023) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-023-42825-y · Cited by 75
Lopes, C., Mota, S., Deus, C., Tavares, H., & Beatriz, M. (2022) · Cells · doi:10.3390/cells11152364 · Cited by 77
The Role of Osteopontin in Microglia Biology: Current Concepts and Future Perspectives
Rosmus, D.-D., Lange, C., Ludwig, F., Ajami, B., & Wieghofer, P. (2022) · Biomedicines · doi:10.3390/biomedicines10040840 · Cited by 70
The systemic immune response in Parkinson’s disease: focus on the peripheral immune component
Lauritsen, J., & Romero‐Ramos, M. (2023) · Trends in Neurosciences · doi:10.1016/j.tins.2023.07.005 · Cited by 66
Heritability Enrichment Implicates Microglia in Parkinson's Disease Pathogenesis
Andersen, M. S., Bandrés‐Ciga, S., Reynolds, R. H., Hardy, J., Ryten, M., Krohn, L., Gan‐Or, Z., Holtman, I. R., & Pihlstrøm, L. (2021) · Annals of Neurology · doi:10.1002/ana.26032 · Cited by 66
The ins and outs of microglial cells in brain health and disease
Pallarés-Moratalla, C., & Bergers, G. (2024) · Frontiers in Immunology · doi:10.3389/fimmu.2024.1305087 · Cited by 66
Wang, L., Nykänen, N.-P., Western, D., Gorijala, P., Timsina, J., Li, F., Wang, Z., Ali, M., Yang, C., Liu, M., et al. (2024) · Molecular Neurodegeneration · doi:10.1186/s13024-023-00687-4 · Cited by 58
Lang, H., Noble, K. V., Barth, J. L., Rumschlag, J. A., Jenkins, T. R., Storm, S., Eckert, M. A., Dubno, J. R., & Schulte, B. A. (2023) · Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.2234-22.2023 · Cited by 58
Suresh, H., Crow, M., Jorstad, N. L., Hodge, R. D., Lein, E. S., Dobin, A., Bakken, T. E., & Gillis, J. (2023) · Nature Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1038/s41559-023-02186-7 · Cited by 58
The role of glial autophagy in Alzheimer’s disease
Litwiniuk, A., Juszczak, G. R., Stankiewicz, A. M., & Urbańska, K. (2023) · Molecular Psychiatry · doi:10.1038/s41380-023-02242-5 · Cited by 54
Disease-associated microglia in neurodegenerative diseases: Friend or foe?
Cheng, Y.-H., & Ho, M. S.-C. (2025) · PLoS Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.3003426 · Cited by 57
PICALM Alzheimer’s risk allele causes aberrant lipid droplets in microglia
Kozlova, A., Zhang, S., Sudwarts, A., Zhang, H., Smirnou, S., Byeon, S. K., Thapa, C., Sun, X., Stephenson, K., Zhao, X., et al. (2025) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-025-09486-x · Cited by 53
Cai, W., Zhang, Y., Chang, T., Wang, Z., Zhu, B., Chen, Y., Gao, X., Xu, L., Zhang, L., Gao, H., et al. (2023) · Journal of Animal Science and Biotechnology/Journal of animal science and biotechnology · doi:10.1186/s40104-023-00876-7 · Cited by 53
Li, C., Ren, J., Zhang, M., Wang, H., Fang, Y., Wu, J., & Tang, Y. (2022) · Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences · doi:10.1007/s00018-022-04536-3 · Cited by 52
Microglia in Health and Diseases: Integrative Hubs of the Central Nervous System (CNS)
Sierra, A., Miron, V. E., Paolicelli, R. C., & Ransohoff, R. M. (2024) · Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Biology · doi:10.1101/cshperspect.a041366 · Cited by 47
echolocatoR : an automated end-to-end statistical and functional genomic fine-mapping pipeline
Schilder, B. M., Humphrey, J., & Raj, T. (2021) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btab658 · Cited by 44
Self-citationMulti-omic insights into Parkinson's Disease: From genetic associations to functional mechanisms
Schilder, B. M., Navarro, E., & Raj, T. (2021) · Neurobiology of Disease · doi:10.1016/j.nbd.2021.105580 · Cited by 45
Self-citationMultimodal Omics Approaches to Aging and Age-Related Diseases
Ji, Q., Jiang, X., Wang, M., Xin, Z., Zhang, W., Qu, J. T., & Liu, G. (2024) · Phenomics · doi:10.1007/s43657-023-00125-x · Cited by 39
Monocyte-derived macrophages act as reinforcements when microglia fall short in Alzheimer’s disease
Abellanas, M. A., Purnapatre, M., Burgaletto, C., & Schwartz, M. (2025) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/s41593-024-01847-5 · Cited by 40
Rajabli, F., Benchek, P. H., Tosto, G., Kushch, N. A., Sha, J., Bazemore, K., Zhu, C., Lee, W., Haut, J., Hamilton‐Nelson, K. L., et al. (2025) · Genome biology · doi:10.1186/s13059-025-03564-z · Cited by 44
Astrocytic Neuroimmunological Roles Interacting with Microglial Cells in Neurodegenerative Diseases
Gotoh, M., Miyamoto, Y., & Ikeshima‐Kataoka, H. (2023) · International Journal of Molecular Sciences · doi:10.3390/ijms24021599 · Cited by 40
Synapses, Microglia, and Lipids in Alzheimer’s Disease
Paasila, P. J., Aramideh, J. A., Sutherland, G. T., & Graeber, M. B. (2022) · Frontiers in Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnins.2021.778822 · Cited by 40
The Mechanism and Function of Glia in Parkinson's Disease
Zhang, X., Zhang, R., Awan, M. U. N., & Bai, J. (2022) · Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fncel.2022.903469 · Cited by 38
Associations of cortical SPP1 and ITGAX with cognition and common neuropathologies in older adults
Lopes, K. D. P., Yu, L., Shen, X., Qiu, Y., Tasaki, S., Iatrou, A., Beeri, M. S., Seyfried, N. T., Menon, V., Wang, Y., et al. (2023) · Alzheimer s & Dementia · doi:10.1002/alz.13474 · Cited by 37
Self-citationAged-Related Changes in Microglia and Neurodegenerative Diseases: Exploring the Connection
Borrajo, A. (2024) · Biomedicines · doi:10.3390/biomedicines12081737 · Cited by 38
Humphrey, J., Brophy, E., Kosoy, R., Zeng, B., Coccia, E., Mattei, D., Ravi, A., Naito, T., Efthymiou, A. G., Navarro, E., et al. (2025) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/s41588-025-02099-0 · Cited by 37
Self-citationNaggan, L., Robinson, E., Dinur, E., Goldenberg, H., Kozela, E., & Yirmiya, R. (2023) · Brain Behavior and Immunity · doi:10.1016/j.bbi.2023.02.021 · Cited by 36
Zhang, X., Zhong, R., Wu, J., Tan, Z., & Jiao, J. (2025) · Microbiome · doi:10.1186/s40168-025-02112-y · Cited by 35
Lee, J., Kim, S. W., & Kim, K.-T. (2022) · Cells · doi:10.3390/cells11121902 · Cited by 34
Immunophenotypes in psychosis: is it a premature inflamm-aging disorder?
Chen, S., Tan, Y., & Tian, L. (2024) · Molecular Psychiatry · doi:10.1038/s41380-024-02539-z · Cited by 36
Gumbs, S. B. H., Kübler, R., Gharu, L., Schipper, P. J., Borst, A. L., Snijders, G. J. L., Ormel, P. R., van Berlekom, A. B., Wensing, A. M. J., de Witte, L. D., et al. (2022) · Journal of NeuroVirology · doi:10.1007/s13365-021-01049-w · Cited by 34
Self-citationLin, Y., Liu, S., Sun, Y., Chen, C., Yang, S., Pei, G., Lin, M., Yu, J., Liu, X., Wang, H., et al. (2024) · Ageing Research Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.arr.2024.102286 · Cited by 33
Genetic insights into immune mechanisms of Alzheimer’s and Parkinson’s disease
Nott, A., & Holtman, I. R. (2023) · Frontiers in Immunology · doi:10.3389/fimmu.2023.1168539 · Cited by 33
Artificial intelligence for dementia genetics and omics
Bettencourt, C., Skene, N., Bandres‐Ciga, S., Anderson, E., Winchester, L. M., Foote, I. F., Schwartzentruber, J., Botia, J. A., Nalls, M., Singleton, A., et al. (2023) · Alzheimer's & Dementia · doi:10.1002/alz.13427 · Cited by 30
Self-citationCastaldi, P. J., Abood, A., Farber, C. R., & Sheynkman, G. (2022) · Human Molecular Genetics · doi:10.1093/hmg/ddac196 · Cited by 30
Kim, B., Dabin, L. C., Tate, M. D., Karahan, H., Sharify, A. D., Acri, D. J., Al-Amin, M. M., Philtjens, S., Smith, D. C., Wijeratne, H. R. S., et al. (2024) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-024-48484-x · Cited by 28
“Interestingly, a recent study demonstrated that SPI1 has a low correlation in gene expression between peripheral monocytes and brain microglia 46 .”
Anand, C., Abdelnour, F., Sipes, B. S., Ma, D., Maia, P. D., Torok, J., & Raj, A. (2025) · Brain · doi:10.1093/brain/awaf179 · Cited by 29
Tin, S. T., Smith‐Byrne, K., Ferrari, P., Rinaldi, S., McCullough, M. L., Teras, L. R., Manjer, J., Giles, G. G., Marchand, L. L., Haiman, C. A., et al. (2024) · Cancer · doi:10.1002/cncr.35391 · Cited by 27
Jang, B., Kailash, B. P., Tokolyi, A., Dredge, W. H., Ravi, A., Jung, S., Naito, T., Kim, B., Kim, M. S., Cho, M., et al. (2026) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/s41588-026-02541-x · Cited by 29
Self-citationŠkandík, M., Frieß, L., Vázquez-Cabrera, G., Keane, L., Grabert, K., Santos, M. C. D. L., Posada-Pérez, M., Balevičiūtė, A., Cheray, M., & Joseph, B. (2025) · Cell Death Discovery · doi:10.1038/s41420-025-02295-1 · Cited by 26
Pottier, C. P., Küçükali, F., Baker, M. C., Batzler, A. J., Jenkins, G. D., van Blitterswijk, M., Vicente, C. T., Coster, W. D., Wynants, S., de Walle, P. V., et al. (2025) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-025-59216-0 · Cited by 28
Unraveling Human Brain Development and Evolution Using Organoid Models
Fernandes, S., Klein, D., & Marchetto, M. C. (2021) · Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology · doi:10.3389/fcell.2021.737429 · Cited by 27
Microglia Exhibit a Unique Intact HIV Reservoir in Human Postmortem Brain Tissue
Nühn, M. M., Gumbs, S. B. H., Schipper, P. J., Drosou, I., Gharu, L., Buchholtz, N. V., Snijders, G. J. L., Gigase, F. A. J., Wensing, A. M. J., Symons, J., et al. (2025) · Viruses · doi:10.3390/v17040467 · Cited by 25
Self-citationde Witte, L. D., Wang, Z., Snijders, G. J. L., Mendelev, N., Liu, Q., Sneeboer, M. A. M., Boks, M. P., Ge, Y., & Haghighi, F. G. (2021) · Biological Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/j.biopsych.2021.10.020 · Cited by 28
Self-citationDang, X., Zhang, Z., & Luo, X. (2022) · Movement Disorders · doi:10.1002/mds.29239 · Cited by 25
Penha, R. C. C., Smith‐Byrne, K., Atkins, J., Haycock, P., Kar, S., Codd, V., Samani, N. J., Nelson, C. P., Milojevic, M., Gabriel, A. A., et al. (2023) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.83118 · Cited by 25
The Two Faces of HDAC3: Neuroinflammation in Disease and Neuroprotection in Recovery
Rosete, C., & Ciernia, A. V. (2024) · Epigenomics · doi:10.1080/17501911.2024.2419357 · Cited by 24
Methylation differences in Alzheimer’s disease neuropathologic change in the aged human brain
Lang, A.-L., Eulalio, T. Y., Fox, E., Yakabi, K., Bukhari, S. A., Kawas, C. H., Corrada, M. M., Montgomery, S. B., Heppner, F. L., Capper, D., et al. (2022) · Acta Neuropathologica Communications · doi:10.1186/s40478-022-01470-0 · Cited by 26
Early-stage idiopathic Parkinson’s disease is associated with reduced circular RNA expression
Whittle, B. J., Izuogu, O. G., Lowes, H., Deen, D., Pyle, A., Coxhead, J., Lawson, R. A., Yarnall, A. J., Jackson, M. S., Santibanez‐Koref, M., et al. (2024) · npj Parkinson s Disease · doi:10.1038/s41531-024-00636-y · Cited by 25
Guo, L., Ni, Z., Wei, G., Cheng, W., Huang, X., & Yue, W. (2022) · Translational Psychiatry · doi:10.1038/s41398-022-02236-x · Cited by 23
Güvenek, A., Parikshak, N., Zamolodchikov, D., Gelfman, S., Moscati, A., Dobbyn, L., Stahl, E. A., Shuldiner, A. R., & Coppola, G. (2024) · Communications Biology · doi:10.1038/s42003-024-06684-7 · Cited by 23
Alzheimer’s disease transcriptional landscape in ex vivo human microglia
Kosoy, R., Fullard, J. F., Bendl, J. M., Kleopoulos, S. P., Shao, Z., Argyriou, S., Mathur, D. D., Psychogyiou, K., Malakates, P., Vicari, J. M., et al. (2025) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/s41593-025-02020-2 · Cited by 22
Self-citationMechanisms of abnormal adult hippocampal neurogenesis in Alzheimer’s disease
Zhou, Y., Wang, X., Liu, Y., Gu, Y., Gu, R., Zhang, G., & Lin, Q. (2023) · Frontiers in Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnins.2023.1125376 · Cited by 22
Microglia in brain aging: An overview of recent basic science and clinical research developments
Fan, H., Zhang, M., Wen, J., Wang, S., Yuan, M., Sun, H., Shu, L., Xu, Y., Pu, Y., & Cai, Z. (2023) · Journal of Biomedical Research · doi:10.7555/jbr.37.20220220 · Cited by 23
ALZT-OP1: an experimental combination regimen for the treatment of Alzheimer’s disease
Lozupone, M., Berardino, G., Mollica, A., Sardone, R., Dibello, V., Zupo, R., Lampignano, L., Castellana, F., Bortone, I., Stallone, R., et al. (2022) · Expert Opinion on Investigational Drugs · doi:10.1080/13543784.2022.2095261 · Cited by 22
Chen, Z., Mao, Z., Tang, W., Shi, Y., Liu, J., & You, Y. (2025) · Translational Neurodegeneration · doi:10.1186/s40035-025-00517-1 · Cited by 27
Xu, M., Liu, Q., Bi, R., Li, Y., Li, H., Kang, W.-B., Yan, Z., Zheng, Q., Sun, C., Ye, M., et al. (2023) · Biological Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/j.biopsych.2023.05.020 · Cited by 21
Gamache, J., Gingerich, D., Shwab, E. K., Barrera, J., Garrett, M. E., Hume, C., Crawford, G. E., Ashley-Koch, A. E., & Chiba-Falek, O. (2023) · Cell & Bioscience · doi:10.1186/s13578-023-01120-5 · Cited by 20
Sun, X., Yao, Z., Chen, L., Huang, J., & Dong, S. (2023) · Fundamental and Clinical Pharmacology · doi:10.1111/fcp.12928 · Cited by 20
Circadian regulation of microglia function: Potential targets for treatment of Parkinson’s Disease
Kou, L., Chi, X., Sun, Y., Yin, S., Wu, J., Zou, W., Wang, Y., Jin, Z., Huang, J., Xiong, N., et al. (2024) · Ageing Research Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.arr.2024.102232 · Cited by 21
Zhang, S., Shu, H., Zhou, J., Rubin-Sigler, J., Yang, X. J., Liu, Y., Cooper‐Knock, J., Monte, E., Zhu, C., Tu, S., et al. (2025) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/s41587-025-02725-6 · Cited by 20
Shared genetic architecture of COVID-19 and Alzheimer’s disease
Matveeva, N. A., Сергеевич, К. И., Baulina, N., Semina, E. V., Kakotkin, V. V., Агапов, М. А., Кулакова, О. Г., & Favorova, O. O. (2023) · Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnagi.2023.1287322 · Cited by 20
Immunogenetic Determinants of Parkinson’s Disease Etiology
Kung, P., Elsayed, I., Reyes‐Pérez, P., & Bandrés‐Ciga, S. (2022) · Journal of Parkinson s Disease · doi:10.3233/jpd-223176 · Cited by 22
Shi, J., Song, C., Zhang, P., Wang, J., Huang, W., Yu, T., Wei, Z., Wang, L., Zhao, L., Zhang, R., et al. (2025) · Theranostics · doi:10.7150/thno.104709 · Cited by 18
Allogenic microglia replacement: A novel therapeutic strategy for neurological disorders
Rao, Y., & Peng, B. (2023) · Fundamental Research · doi:10.1016/j.fmre.2023.02.025 · Cited by 18
Xu, J., Song, W., Xu, Z., Danziger, M. M., Karavani, E., Zang, C., Chen, X., Li, Y., Paz, I. R., Gohel, D., et al. (2024) · Alzheimer s & Dementia · doi:10.1002/alz.14373 · Cited by 17
Powerful gene-based testing by integrating long-range chromatin interactions and knockoff genotypes
Ma, S., Dalgleish, J. L. T., Lee, J., Wang, C., Liu, L., Gill, R. J., Buxbaum, J. D., Chung, W. K., Aschard, H., Silverman, E. K., et al. (2021) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.2105191118 · Cited by 17
Metadata
- Authors
- Lopes, K. D. P., Snijders, G. J. L., Humphrey, J., Allan, A., Sneeboer, M. A. M., Navarro, E., Schilder, B. M., Vialle, R. A., Parks, M., Missall, R., van Zuiden, W., Gigase, F. A. J., Kübler, R., van Berlekom, A. B., Hicks, E. M., Bӧttcher, C., Priller, J., Kahn, R. S., de Witte, L. D., & Raj, T.
- Affiliations
- James J. Peters VA Medical Center (US)
- Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai (US)
- Utrecht University (NL)
- Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin (DE)
- Corresponding author
- Raj, Towfique
- ORCID
- Venue
- Nature Genetics
- Published
- 2022-01
- Volume
- 54
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 4-17
- ISSN
- 1061-4036 (ISSN-L)
- 1546-1718
- PMC
- PMC9245609
- OpenAlex
- W4205777871
- Cited by
- 273
- References
- 127
- Citations by year
- 2026: 57 · 2025: 58 · 2024: 68 · 2023: 46 · 2022: 37
- FWCI
- 5.89
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- doi.org
- Locations
- Nature Genetics (publishedVersion)
- bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- Utrecht University Repository (Utrecht University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Funders
- Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai (S10OD026880)
- Stichting de Drie Lichten
- ZonMw
- National Institutes of Health (1r21ag063130-01a1, 1s10od026880-01, 1rf1ag065926-01a1, 1r56ag055824-01a1)
- Medical Research Council (MC_PC_16031)
- National Institute on Aging (R21-AG063130, U01AG068880, NIA R21-AG063130, R01AG054005, R56- AG055824, RF1-AG065926)
- National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (U01NS107016, R01NS116006)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic Associations and Epidemiology
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Single-cell and spatial transcriptomics
- Keywords
- microglia, brain aging, splicing quantitative trait loci, expression quantitative trait loci, microglial heterogeneity, Alzheimer's disease, Parkinson's disease, P2Y12 receptor, mental illness, sex differences
- MeSH terms
- Aging, Alzheimer Disease, Atlases as Topic, Brain, Female, Humans, Male, Parkinson Disease, RNA Splicing, Microglia, Genetic Heterogeneity, Genetic Predisposition to Disease, Gene Expression Profiling, Quantitative Trait Loci, Transcriptome, Datasets as Topic
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-11-06, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).
A second model labelled each claim on 2026-11-06 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).
Cited sources are checked with a language model’s help (gpt-6-sol).
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review