Cited by 2,930AI in cancer detectionRadiomics and Machine Learning in Medical ImagingLung Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 71 of the 71 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Classification and mutation prediction from non–small cell lung cancer histopathology images using deep learning

Open access

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Visual inspection of histopathology slides is one of the main methods used by pathologists to assess the stage, type and subtype of lung tumors. Adenocarcinoma (LUAD) and squamous cell carcinoma (LUSC) are the most prevalent subtypes of lung cancer, and their distinction requires visual inspection by an experienced pathologist. In this study, we trained a deep convolutional neural network (inception v3) on whole-slide images obtained from The Cancer Genome Atlas to accurately and automatically classify them into LUAD, LUSC or normal lung tissue. The performance of our method is comparable to that of pathologists, with an average area under the curve (AUC) of 0.97. Our model was validated on independent datasets of frozen tissues, formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissues and biopsies. Furthermore, we trained the network to predict the ten most commonly mutated genes in LUAD. We found that six of them-STK11, EGFR, FAT1, SETBP1, KRAS and TP53-can be predicted from pathology images, with AUCs from 0.733 to 0.856 as measured on a held-out population. These findings suggest that deep-learning models can assist pathologists in the detection of cancer subtype or gene mutations. Our approach can be applied to any cancer type, and the code is available at https://github.com/ncoudray/DeepPATH .

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41591-018-0177-5

Cites

71 of 71 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 71 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Coudray, N., Ocampo, P. S., Sakellaropoulos, T., Narula, N., Snuderl, M., Fenyö, D., Moreira, A. L., Razavian, N., & Tsirigos, A.
Affiliations
  • New York University (US)
  • National Technical University of Athens (GR)
  • NYU Langone Health (US)
Corresponding author
  • Razavian, Narges
  • Tsirigos, Aristotelis
Venue
Nature Medicine
Published
2018-09-17
Volume
24
Issue
10
Pages
1559-1567
ISSN
  • 1078-8956 (ISSN-L)
  • 1546-170X
OpenAlex
W2760946358
Cited by
2,930
References
71
Citations by year
2026: 349 · 2025: 380 · 2024: 380 · 2023: 436 · 2022: 452 · 2021: 415 · 2020: 319 · 2019: 183 · 2018: 10
FWCI
130.74
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • NYU Langone Medical Center
  • School of Medicine, New York University
  • National Cancer Institute (P30CA016087)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › AI in cancer detection
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Lung Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
Keywords
non-small cell lung cancer, lung adenocarcinoma, squamous cell carcinoma, histopathological image classification, whole slide images, gene mutation prediction, STK11, EGFR, FAT1, SETBP1, KRAS, TP53, computer-aided diagnosis, frozen tissue, formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissue, biopsy
MeSH terms
Deep Learning, Adenocarcinoma, Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung, Carcinoma, Squamous Cell, Humans, Mutation, Neoplasm Proteins, Gene Expression Regulation, Neoplastic, Neural Networks, Computer

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review